Line item Valuation F.05

Hi Experts,
We are facing piculiar issue, We have couple of GLs which are maintained on line item basis. These accounts are in KDF.
When I compare the FBL3N open item on a key date 31.01.2012 and F.05 valuation key date 31.01.2012, the Document currency values are not matching and the difference is wide.
FBL3N values are far more.
What could be the reason for not all the documents getting picked up for valuation f.05.
There has been no chnage in GL Master since the setup of account.
Best Regards
Rejesh

Hi,
First maybe you can go trough to one transaction and see the exchange rate on the document when the transaction executed,
check the Document Currency and Local Currency Field, is it same if we refer to the exchange rate on that transaction?
if it is different, maybe in the past some one using FBR2 tcode to post the same document and change the exchange rate manually but not change the local currency amount
it happen to me several times ago.
RNA

Similar Messages

Material document line item - inventory valuation affected ?

Hello
In the framework of building a stock report, I'm trying to know if a material document line item has affected inventory valuation that is to say if a corresponding accounting document line item has been posted.
Explored solutions :
- there is no link between MSEG and BSEG
- I tried to look at Quantity string (BUSTM) in MSEG and looked at Quantity strings parameters in T156M but couldn't find a parameter of the value string mentionning if it affects inventory valuation or not
Thanks a lot in advance for your inputs
Regards

Hi,
MKPF is for material document header table MSEG is for material document item table
Creation date will be at the header table, use document number to link both the tables.
Regards
Merwyn

Line item not appearing in PGI accounting document

Hi after complete sales process Sales order---Delivery -PGI-----Billing, when i chked the pgi & click on the Accountiong tab in pgi document only twoo line items appearing instead of three in the document
<< Moderator message - Everyone's problem is important. Please do not ask for help quickly. >>
thanks
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Dec 17, 2010 6:25 PM

Hi
That particular material is in split valuation class & for it three valuation types are defined out of three two valuation types defined with moving average price & the rest one is not defined for the same, by default system automatically picking up the blank valuation type so it is the job of the end user to fill the valuation type in the sales order in Item details tab so the system will pick up the cost & will post to PGI Accounting document

Logic of determining value for Inventory offsetting line item

Hi,
I want to know the following for the reversal of Process Order for materials for which the price control is 'S'.
How the value for GBB (Inventory offsetting) is determined. I have observed it taking the weighted rate of the (Summation of the Total Actual Cost / Sumation of Actual Qunatity) * Reversal Quantity. The BSX line item is determined by Standard Price * Reversal Quantity
The balance is posted in the Price difference.
I want to know why this difference is determining tge line items.
I have gone thru SAP Note 216080 in this regard but failed to understandard the basic resaon why this is happening.
Regards
Partha

Dear colleague,
you are right
>note 422606:
a) The manufactured material has price control 'S' (Standard price).
   Valuation is carried out for goods receipts using the standard
   price that is currently valid.
   For the reversal of goods receipts, the valuation of the debit of
   the order (offsetting entry to stock posting) is carried out
   using the price determined from the quotient of value of goods
   received and quantity of goods received. That is, all previous
   goods receipts are used for the valuation of the reversal of a
   goods receipt, but order settlements are not used.
It is the standard system behaviour that the reversal of goods receipt
for production order are not valuated with standard price. All previous
goods receipts are used for the valuation of the reversal of a
goods receipt.
Goods receipts are always reversed with an average of the prices of
all goods receipts in the order history. Therefore price differences
may occur. This behaviour is as well explained in the attached
note 49995 in the reasons and prerequisites step. As well you find
an explanation in note's 422606 symptoms. the system tries to avoid the reversal
with posted values no longer possible.
If this replies your question ,please mark it as answered,
best regards,
maria

How to enter line item in delivery document?

Dear All
I am confused is there any standard in SAP SD that we can enter one line item directly in delivery document?
I have a scenario for which i want to do this.
I am using material type DIEN and item category TAX for freigh billing. We want to create freight posting using dummy non valuated material DIEN. We will directly enter this material 9999 in delivery order.
I am doing this but system gives me error. I have assigned in T-Code 0184 delivery type LF item category group DIEN Item category for the higher level item TAN item category TAX. When i enter material 9999 in delivery document system gives me this error
*No item category exists (Table T184L LF DIEN )
Message no. VL320
Diagnosis
There is no item category available in item category determination in the delivery (table T184L) for the following entries: LF DIEN
System Response
The system does not allow further processing of this item.
Procedure
Specify the appropriate item category for the above mentioned entries or inform your system administrator.*
please suggest how to do this. Or if you have any better solution please suggest that. our requirement is that we want to post freight expense directly in freight expense GL and transporter GL. WE are not using transportation module instead we are using simple Sale order > Delivery order > Billing document process. Billing is created from delivery document.

Item category determination is working fine. Now i am getting this error while creating billing document with reference to delivery document.
6000054192 000020 Please check Customizing for cross-company
Diagnosis
The system checks whether this is a cross-company
situation, which means that it checks whether two different
company codes exist and whether billing status has been set
to intercompany billing.
Procedure
    Check in Customizing under Sales and Distribution->
    Billing-> Intercompany billing to make sure all necessary
    settings have been made.
But actually this is not cross company transaction. Please help me in this regard

In Capital P.O - Multiple asset number in a single line item

Hi friends,
My Client is using SAP 4.7. In capital P.O selecting account assignment as 'A' asset and entering in description as Laptop 5 Qtys in a single line item. in item details account assignment tab its asking to enter asset. I'm able to select only one asset number. But my client requirement is it should ask to enter 5 asset number....
Pls anyone give solution for the above scenario....
very urgent.... pls

Hi,
1st check in OME9 t.code for account assignment A, the selection of 2(Multiple account ***)in field ID: AcctAssgt Scrn and Distribution field as 1 and save.
Then during capital P.O. creation for single line item & in Item details TAB, in account assignment segment, you can enter qty with asset number (A1) with G/L account for 1st Line and for 2nd line keep qty. with asset number(A2) with G/L account ( different G/L Account) OR enter qty with asset number (A1) with G/L account for 1st Line and for 2nd line keep qty. with another asset number(A2) with G/L account (same G/L Account)
Option-1----> In account assignment segment , As you needed
G/L account----
Asset
12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A1
12346u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A2
12347u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A3
12348u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A4
12349u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A5
Having a concept that GR is non-valuated and accounting entries in invoice (without tax) are:
Vendor A/C: Cr
G/L account (12345): Dr
G/L account (12346): Dr
G/L account (12347): Dr
G/L account (12348 ):Dr
G/L account (12349 ):Dr
Option-2---> In account assignment segment , You can have also
G/L account----
Asset
12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A1
12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A2
12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A3
12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A4
12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A5
Having a concept that GR is non-valuated and accounting entries in invoice (without tax) are:
Vendor A/C: Cr
G/L account (12345): Dr
Regards,
Biju K

Badi ISU_PRODUCT_CHANGE and creation of a new contract line item

Hello Gurus;
I have this requirement: Once a contract gets close the ending date (30 days before) i need to automatically renew the contract. In order to do that i thought that an action in the Contract Item might get the job done and browsing i found that badi ISU_PRODUCT_CHANGE does almost what i need even if it creates a new contract line item with a new product and this is not good for me... Does anybody know if there is a better Badi matching with my requirements or i have to "modify" the ISU_PRODUCT_CHANGE? I hope my question was clear if you need more specifics please ask me...
Thank you very much.
Fabio

You can create a new costing variant with a valuation variant that points to inforecords for material prices. Go to OKKN t-code and create the required configuration and start using the new costing variant to measure the current cost of making vehicles.

In Purchase Order Line item Maintaining Serial Numbers for Material Codes

Dear Gurus,
We have a business process in legacy system for Purchase Order like in PO line item, Material code with description, Quantity, unit of Measurement, Serial Number Start and Serial Number End is maintained, for example for Material code when we enter the data AXMLN00001 in Serial Number Start column, if the Qty 500 is maintained, by default system will calculate AXMLN00500 in Serial Number End column.
We understand that in standard SAP we donu2019t have this option of maintaining Serial Number Start and End in Purchase order Line item. Please let us know how this can be mapped and is it advisable to create two Z fields in EKPO table or else can we make any development.
Suppose if this is not possible in SAP for PO then in Banks if we want to place a order for Cheque books how we can maintain Start and End Serial Numbers to print in cheque books.
Also client is not agreeing to maintain manually Serial numbers in item text.
regards,
Dhanu

Aamir,
When the PO Item was created say for example Material had Valuation category "Y" and latter you wanted to change the category to "Y". Now system would have check for all open PO's etc...based on this you must have set Deletion Indicator to this Line Item to allow valuation category change in material master. Now when this Item got created in the table level (EKPO), system updates the valuation category "Y". Currently this valuation category is not active so it would not allow you to perform removal of deletion indicator as program cannot automatically nor you have an option to manually update the valuation category to this Item.
Regards,
Prasobh

Defaulting profit center from sales order while doing delive COGS line item

HI All
In my company COGS account is a cost element.when PGI(post goods issue) was posted, sap will automatically create an accounting dcument
CR:stock account ( profit center from material master data or from sales order)
DT:Cost of goods sold ( profit center from cost center master data)Can we default profit center from material master data(or from sales order) in the COGS line item
Thanks in advance

What is your current Version? Is it ECC6 and New GL implemented? Document split configuration will help you.
If you are not using ECC6 and New GL, then try T.Code 3KEH and determine profit center based on Valuation area. OR
You may look into GL Line item level, Write a Validation Rule to select profit center.
Hope this will help you.
Thanks
VR

Goods Receipt Value line item wise

Hi Experts,
My client wants show Goods Receipt Value line item wise at the time of GR entries.
He wants show GR Value before saving the GR document.
Please advise me how it is possible.
Thanks in advance,
Chandhu

and what will be the benefit of such request? do you think a receiver (warehouse personell) can valuate whether the Po price is correct maintained by a buyer?
Maybe it is better to create check reports for the buyers instead.
you can certainly check in a user exit if price is far away from the price maintained in material master and can issue a warning or even an error.

How to make plant default on the line item along with the item category

Hi All,
I want to default Plant on the line item along with the item category.In order to meet the following scnario.
1. I have two plants,first plant is maintained for the valuated item and the second plant is maintained for the non valuated item (Free Goods).
Whenever user is entering an item in the sales order for which corresponding free goods item is maintained in the master record.System is proposing two lines items in the sales order.
First line item is the main item which appears along with the Plant 1 which contains valuated items
Second line item is for the Free of charge item which is being proposed from Plant 2, which contains the non valuated items.
I want that the system should always propose Plant 1 with main item and Plant 2 with the Free of Charge item by default. (Along with the item category TAN and TANN)
Rahul

Delivering Plant is determined in the following order
1. Customer material info record.
2. Customer master
3. Material master.
Use one of them an default your plant.
I think in your case you can use the materila master which will give an item level plant different. The other two will default the plant at the header level.
regards
jude

Unable to delete PO line item if GR qty is different from IV qty

Dear all,
Please help me to check this issue. The PO line item purchased with 10pcs (quantity), and the goods receipt (GR) is 10pcs as well as the invoice verification for 10pcs. However, weeks later, they performed a movement type of 102 to cancel 2pcs back to vendor, but no subsequent movements follow up.
Now, the user wanted to delete this line item in PO, but the system throw out an error message:
"Quantity delivered differs from qty. invoiced (Function not possible)"
Diagnosis: You have attempted to delete an item whose GR and IR quantities differ.
Is there any work-around or solution of how to delete this PO line item?
Thank you and appreciate for helps.
Warm Regards,
Edwin

Dear both,
Thanks for the prompt reply. This particular material is not applying the "GR-based IV" feature. This is why the user is able to cancel the goods receipt without the cancellation of invoice first.
The reason why the user needs to delete the PO line item for this material is because they need to change the valuation class of the material which they suspect this is the cause. They have clear all the stocks quantity, clear all the relevant open quantity but left this PO line item. They wanted to delete the line item so that they can change the valuation class.
Does it mean that it has to use credit memo to clear the quantity? This transaction was posted in 2007, what would be the impact to FI if I post credit memo in 2008?
Thank you very much for your helps.
Warm Regards,
Edwin

Issue in Delivery Line Item through VL01N

Hi,
During Delivery creation through VL01N, in Line Item details under Financial Processing Tab, Cost Center is showing as non-changable... We cann't enter any value in this field..
We have two options--
1. By make the field as changable, so that we can enter the related cost center.
2. Automatic Cost center should should according to Profit center...
Please provide the best solution...
Thanks..

hi
cost center its comes from setting related , it related with business area , it delivery its not possible to enter cost center ,
it is totally related with fico ,
so first you maintain the cost element , it cost element you can check previous delivery document accounting , goto delivery goods issue document document( mb03), click on display document , ofter click on accounting document , her double click on accounting document , system sows , accounting for debit and credit here g/l account and cost element account you can find,
goto okb9 , and select your company and cost element ,click on valuation area/business area based , here you plant and business area ,cost center find,
in delivery no need direct enter the cost center , its automatic picking when you click on PGI,Updating at mb03,
please check this , and also you contact your fico consultant

ME22N line item issue

dear all,
I was done one ME22N, GR and Down payment validation BADI : ZMMGL_BI_POVALID. In that i raise some error messages based on the line item level. Error everything is getting fine.
But problem is suppose line item 2 having error, the error message is coming on pop up menu,but error traffic symbol is showing always last line item. How we will solve these issue.. Kindly give one valid solution for this.
Regards,
Sap_bab

rajanshah219,
Here's my take on how to fix:
*Manually change Config TCode OMT4 - change message MM 326 & 327 to type "W" (if open order exists...now you can enter through warning messages)
*If inventory exists, then issue out of stock to a cost center
*Change valuation class
*Put stock back into inventory (reverse to that same cost center) Note issue out and reverse back into inventory must happen in the same posting period.
**Valuation class should be changed as expected
**Manually change config TCode OMT4 - change message MM 326 & 327 back to type "E"
Thanks,
Jason

XML shows multiple po distributions account for each po line item

Hi, We have custome RDF created for Purchase Order Detail Report. Per the PO summary report, PO nubmer 30367 has two lines and each on has single distributions. Each line has different distributions. Line 1distribution account: 01.000.105.65020.00000.00 and Line 2 distribution account: 01.000.000.15020.00000.00. However when I run the XML for PO summary report, each line items contains the two account distributions. How do you make it sho it only show the account distribution pertain to the each line?
**Please see xml below.**
- <LIST_G_COMPANY>
- <G_COMPANY>
<C_COMPANY>CTI US Ledger</C_COMPANY>
<C_ORGANIZATION_ID>83</C_ORGANIZATION_ID>
<GL_CURRENCY>USD</GL_CURRENCY>
<STRUCTURE_ACC>101</STRUCTURE_ACC>
<STRUCTURE_CAT>101</STRUCTURE_CAT>
<C_YES>Yes</C_YES>
<C_NO>No</C_NO>
<C_CATEGORY_SET_ID>1</C_CATEGORY_SET_ID>
<BUSINESS_GROUP_ID>0</BUSINESS_GROUP_ID>
- <LIST_G_HEADERS>
- <G_HEADERS>
<POH_REMARKS />
<CREATION_DATE>01-SEP-10</CREATION_DATE>
<STATUS>Approved</STATUS>
<REV>0</REV>
<PRINTED_DATE />
<TYPE>Standard Purchase Order</TYPE>
<BUYER>BUNTING, DOUGLAS</BUYER>
<C_CURRENCY>USD</C_CURRENCY>
<VENDOR>Softchoice Corporation</VENDOR>
<ACCEPTANCE_DATE />
<ON_HOLD />
<VENDOR_SITE>SOFTCHOICE - PO</VENDOR_SITE>
<ACCEPTANCE_REQUIRED>No</ACCEPTANCE_REQUIRED>
<C_AMOUNT_AGR>2500</C_AMOUNT_AGR>
<PO_HEADER_ID1>2790</PO_HEADER_ID1>
<REVISED_DATE />
<PO_NUMBER>30367</PO_NUMBER>
<C_FND_PRECISION>2</C_FND_PRECISION>
- <LIST_G_BREAK_LINES>
- <G_BREAK_LINES>
<LINE>1</LINE>
<LINE_TYPE>GOODS</LINE_TYPE>
<REV1 />
<ITEM_DESCRIPTION>Test</ITEM_DESCRIPTION>
<UNIT>EACH</UNIT>
<PO_HEADER_ID>2790</PO_HEADER_ID>
<UNIT_PRICE>500</UNIT_PRICE>
- <LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
- <G_SHIPMENTS>
<CLOSED_CODE />
<LINE_CLOSED>N</LINE_CLOSED>
<LINE_CANCEL>N</LINE_CANCEL>
<NOTE_TO_VENDOR />
<NEED_BY_DATE />
<PROMISED_DATE />
<SHIP_TO_LOCATION>CELL THERAPEUTICS INC</SHIP_TO_LOCATION>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>1</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>1</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>
<C_FLEX_CAT>COMPUTER SUPPLIES</C_FLEX_CAT>
<C_FLEX_ITEM />
</G_SHIPMENTS>
</LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
- <LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
- <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
<PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
<CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.000.15020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<PLL_LOCATION_ID>3053</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
</G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
- <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
<PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
<CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.105.65020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<PLL_LOCATION_ID>3052</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
</G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
</LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>COMPUTER.SUPPLIES.</C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>
<C_FLEX_ITEM_DISP />
</G_BREAK_LINES>
- <G_BREAK_LINES>
<LINE>2</LINE>
<LINE_TYPE>GOODS</LINE_TYPE>
<REV1 />
<ITEM_DESCRIPTION>test</ITEM_DESCRIPTION>
<UNIT>EACH</UNIT>
<PO_HEADER_ID>2790</PO_HEADER_ID>
<UNIT_PRICE>1000</UNIT_PRICE>
- <LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
- <G_SHIPMENTS>
<CLOSED_CODE />
<LINE_CLOSED>N</LINE_CLOSED>
<LINE_CANCEL>N</LINE_CANCEL>
<NOTE_TO_VENDOR />
<NEED_BY_DATE />
<PROMISED_DATE />
<SHIP_TO_LOCATION>CELL THERAPEUTICS INC</SHIP_TO_LOCATION>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>2</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_ORDERED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_RECEIVED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_CANCELLED>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>2</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_DUE>
<QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>0</QUANTITY_AMOUNT_BILLED>
<C_FLEX_CAT>COMPUTER SUPPLIES</C_FLEX_CAT>
<C_FLEX_ITEM />
</G_SHIPMENTS>
</LIST_G_SHIPMENTS>
- <LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
- <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
<PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
<CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.000.15020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<PLL_LOCATION_ID>3053</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
</G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
- <G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>DOUGLAS BUNTING</DELIVER_TO_PERSON_NAME>
<PO_HEADER_ID2>2790</PO_HEADER_ID2>
<CONCAT_SEGMENTS>01.000.105.65020.00000.00</CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<PLL_LOCATION_ID>3052</PLL_LOCATION_ID>
</G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
</LIST_G_CONCAT_SEGMENTS>
<C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>COMPUTER.SUPPLIES.</C_FLEX_CAT_DISP>
<C_FLEX_ITEM_DISP />
</G_BREAK_LINES>
</LIST_G_BREAK_LINES>
<C_AMOUNT_AGR_ROUND>2500</C_AMOUNT_AGR_ROUND>
<C_AMOUNT_AGR_DISP>2,500.00</C_AMOUNT_AGR_DISP>
</G_HEADERS>
</LIST_G_HEADERS>
</G_COMPANY>
</LIST_G_COMPANY>
<XCOMPANY_NAME>CTI US Ledger</XCOMPANY_NAME>
<YES>Yes</YES>
<NO>No</NO>
<ORG_ID>83</ORG_ID>
<CAT_ID>1</CAT_ID>
<COUNT_RECORDS>1</COUNT_RECORDS>
</XXCTI_POXPOSTD_1>
**Here is the Query for the RDF file...**
SELECT pol.line_num Line
, pol.closed_flag Line_Closed
, pol.cancel_flag Line_Cancel
, pol.closed_code
, plt.line_type Line_Type
, &P_FLEX_CAT C_FLEX_CAT
, &P_FLEX_ITEM C_FLEX_ITEM
, pol.item_revision Rev
, pol.item_description Item_Description
, pol.unit_meas_lookup_code Unit
, pol.note_to_vendor Note_to_Vendor
/* Bug: 141118 Take unit price from PO_LINES if there is no shipment */
, to_number(decode(plt.order_type_lookup_code,
'AMOUNT',null,
nvl(pll.price_override,pol.unit_price))) Unit_Price
, hrl.location_code Ship_To_Location
, pll.promised_date Promised_Date
, pll.need_by_date Need_By_Date
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount),
NVL(PLL.quantity, POL.quantity)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Ordered
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
NVL(PLL.quantity_received, 0)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Received
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0),
NVL(PLL.quantity_cancelled, 0)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Cancelled
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0)
- NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0)
- NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),
NVL (PLL.quantity, POL.quantity) - NVL(PLL.quantity_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.quantity_received, 0)),
:p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Due
, ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code, /* <SERVICES FPJ> */
'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),
'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),
NVL(PLL.quantity_billed, 0)), :p_qty_precision) Quantity_Amount_Billed
, pol.po_header_id
FROM po_line_locations pll
, mtl_system_items msi
, mtl_categories mca
, po_lines pol
, po_line_types plt
, hr_locations hrl
WHERE
ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code,'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount) - NVL(PLL.amount_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.amount_received, 0),NVL (PLL.quantity, POL.quantity) - NVL(PLL.quantity_cancelled, 0) - NVL(PLL.quantity_received, 0)), :p_qty_precision) > 0
AND (ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code,'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount),'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount, POL.amount), NVL(PLL.quantity, POL.quantity)),:p_qty_precision)) > (ROUND (DECODE (PLT.order_type_lookup_code,'RATE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),'FIXED PRICE', NVL(PLL.amount_billed, 0),NVL(PLL.quantity_billed, 0)), :p_qty_precision))
AND pol.item_id = msi.inventory_item_id(+)
AND nvl(msi.organization_id,:c_organization_id) = :c_organization_id
AND pol.line_type_id = plt.line_type_id
AND pol.category_id = mca.category_id
/* Bug No 141118
Added the outer join on po_line_id ,hrl.location_id and nvl on the shipment_type
Also added nvl on quantity and price so as to select quantity and price if the PO
has no shipments */
AND pol.po_line_id = pll.po_line_id(+)
AND pll.ship_to_location_id = hrl.location_id(+)
AND pll.shipment_type in ('STANDARD', 'PLANNED')
AND &P_WHERE_CAT
AND &P_WHERE_ITEM
ORDER BY pol.line_num

> I made a pr with single line item with 3 account assignment on percentage basis.I created a PO against .GR non valuated was automatically ticked so no account assignment was created at the time of GR posting.
When you are having the multiple account assignment, then the system will force you to have GR-non valuated indicator being flagged which results in the fact there is not any FI document at GR posting stage and this is the standard feature of SAP.
> Can I make a valuted GR against PO line item with multiple account assignment.
No, not at all. The disability of GR indicator can be set in OME9 with account assignment category
> I faced another problem .I displayed the GR and after ticking out put check box in the general data page of the GR doc. the output is being saved but the update is terminated immediately.and no output page is generated in this item level.This output problem is not there at the time of single account assignment at PO line item.
In fact, it is possible to maintain multiple account assignment for each and every PO line item by selecting the 'Multiple Account Assignment' button in the 'Account Assignment' View of the Item Detail of PO. However, for such multiple account assignment selection, no accounting document will be generated upon GR maintenance. This can only be done during IR via LIV process.

Line item Valuation F.05

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for