List backup; show different a different size to backup pieces

Hi,
when I exec a "list backup;" with RMAN the show Size values of a backup piece are not equal to file size of backup pieces. Sometime there are differences up to 50%. I found no reason why that both values differ, as "Size" is sometomes smaller and otherwise bigger than the file size.
Does anyone has any idea ?
thanks in advance,
greets,
Rainer

I think You cannot restore 11.2.0.1 database to 11.2.0.2 .You can. See MOS Doc.ID 790559.1 - RMAN Restore of Backups as Part of a Database Upgrade
Said that I've never tried to restore an Enterprise or Standard edition to a XE one, I think the problem here is not the version, but the edition, due to XE limitations.

Similar Messages

Why does lun show different size on different rac nodes?

Hi all,
We are trying to increase ASM disk space and with respect to it when we are trying to allocate more space this question came across my mind. Now this was previously configured by my previous SA.
[root@oracledbtest1 ~]# /etc/init.d/oracleasm querydisk -d `/etc/init.d/oracl
cut -f2,10,11 -d" " | perl -pe 's/"(.*)".*\[(.*), *(.*)\]/$1 $2 $3/g;' |
while read v_asmdisk v_minor v_major
do
v_device=`ls -la /dev | grep " $v_minor, *$v_major " | awk '{print $10}'`
echo "ASM disk $v_asmdisk based on /dev/$v_device [$v_minor, $v_major]"
done
**ASM disk ASM01 based on /dev/dm-15 [253, 15]**
**ASM disk ASM02 based on /dev/dm-14 [253, 14]**
node 2:
[root@oracledbtest1 ~]# /etc/init.d/oracleasm querydisk -d `/etc/init.d/oracleasm listdisks -d` |
cut -f2,10,11 -d" " | perl -pe 's/"(.*)".*\[(.*), *(.*)\]/$1 $2 $3/g;' |
while read v_asmdisk v_minor v_major
do
v_device=`ls -la /dev | grep " $v_minor, *$v_major " | awk '{print $10}'`
echo "ASM disk $v_asmdisk based on /dev/$v_device [$v_minor, $v_major]"
done
**ASM disk ASM01 based on /dev/dm-13 [253, 13]**
**ASM disk ASM02 based on /dev/dm-14 [253, 14]**
Now, can any one help me in telling why are my LUN's showing different sizes on RAC and also the best way to allocate the space to the disks in the above scenario.
P.S I am fairly new in posting to the OTN. Please excuse if I am not clear with my question.
Edited by: 902932 on Apr 8, 2013 8:25 AM

why you think the space is different between the 2 nodes?
The devices are different, that's ok, dm- is the device mapper name, and several devices will create dm-* like entries, so it's ok to have them different.
When you add a disk, you should follow an approach like:
Present the disk on the storage
Refresh the luns on all the nodes
Create the oracleasm disk on one node
refresh the oracleasm disks on all the nodes
verify the new oracleasm disk is present on all nodes in /dev/oracleasm/disks/*
At this point, you can use asmca or sqlplus in the +ASMn instance to make your asm diskgroup to grow, or create a new disk group

How to show different size of custom fonts on different mobiles

I am currently working on a J2ME project on which we are using low level API. We want to display custom fonts on mobiles and we want to show different size of fonts according tot he resolution and screen density of mobile screen resolution is provide by J2ME but screen density is not provided is there any way to calculate screen density using WURLF, Or any other third party api or JSR.

See RAS samples [here|https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/BOBJ/NETRASSDK+Samples]. Look for "NET-CS2003_RAS-Managed_BE115_Add_Image" or "NET-VB2003_RAS-Managed_BE115_Add_Image-From-File".
Ludek

Two hard drives with exact same files showing different sizes

I have two WD external drives, one which I'm trying to dedicate solely to Time Machine backups. In transferring data from the one I intend to use for that purpose to the other, I'm finding that all the files transferred but that the folders register as having different sizes (e.g. one video folder has the same number in each, but on the original disk it was 4.43 GB in total and is only 4.26 GB on the new disk).
I've read that there could be hidden system files that didn't move, but if that's the case does it matter? Both drives are the same model but are differently formatted.
Thanks

but are differently formatted.
That could be the cause. Files are not written to a disk in bytes, they are written in blocks that are a minimum size. For instance, if the minimum block size is 1KB, the a 5 byte file will occupy 1KB on the disk. So, depending on the block size of the drive format, you may get different results.

HD Get Info Showing Different Size After Using Disk Utility

I recently removed my second partition I used as a back up to free up some more space. I booted into the Leopard install CD and ran disk utility to delete the 2nd partition and resized my "home" partition to ~148GB and had no issues. I booted into Leopard and used "Get Info" on my "home" drive and noted it showing my HD size was only ~74GB. I used find to search for files on "This Mac" where size was greater than 500 MB and found nothing unusual. Does anyone have an idea what this issue could be?
Thanks in advance
Matt

Hi Tom,
Of course, that makes perfect sense! When I made my last disk image backup, my PowerBook had a serious, undiagnosed problem and I had booted from the startup disk to have a current backup of everything before I sent it off for repair.
Thanks for your help.
Rick

RAID Admin and Disk Utility show different sizes

Hello all,
I have tried searching through these forums for a resolution to this, but did not really find one. Here is my situation:
I have an XServe Dual G4 in a branch office. It has attached to it an XServe RAID. Last week, when I was down working in the office I added a new drive to the RAID. The lower channel on the RAID had 4 172GB drives in it, and I added a 5th and and told RAID admin to resize the RAID.
The next day, the RAID was finished resizing. RAID admin was reporting that the array was now 690GB. However, after rebooting the server and RAID multiple times, Disk Utility in OS X is still showing that the Volume on the RAID is only 517GB.
So, I have a couple of questions:
1. How is it possible that by adding a 172GB drive to a RAID 5 array that was about 520GB I ended up with an array that is 690 GB? That would imply that there is no parity (since 690 - 520 = 170 and the drive I added in was 172GB).
2. How do I get the server to see the additional space? The server is at the newest version of the OS and the RAID it as the newest version of the firmware.
Please help.
Mac OS X (10.4.8)

I've run into the same issue with a newer PPC XServe. However, after I tried to reformat, I still only show up with the orginal size, and not the new size, even after I restarted the server and XRAID.
Did you have any success with your reformat?

Transferring files from Mac to shared drive shows different sizes?

I'm currently using a router with DD-WRT to share out media files in my house. However, it requires NTFS or EXT2/3 which is more difficult to format and will not recognize native formats beyond that. The current external drive is NTFS.
The interesting thing is that many files that I've transferred below 4GB's appear fine when streaming them. However, files that I've transferred above 4GB's seem to either get compressed or truncated in some way.
Anyone know what's going on?

Why does the flash drive need to be formatted NTFS?
If you have no valid reason for it to be formatted NTFS then reformating might be a simpier solution.
Allan

Why is the text different sizes?

Hi,
The text with this browser shows different sizes of text on a web page? Some is normal, then some is tiny. I you pinch the page up to read the tiny text, the normal text goes very large. It ruins reading a web page. Why does this happen, and is there anything I can do about it? It is particularly difficult when on a forum.
Thankyou.

Hello,
Try change the minimum text size in your firefox:
*[https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/font-size-and-zoom-increase-size-of-web-pages#w_how-do-i-set-the-minimum-text-size-for-text-zoom How to select minimum text size]

RMAN Problem -- Crosscheck backup & list backup showing different results

Pls Help !!!
I'm using RMAN for backup policy is to recovery window of 7 days
but even on thired day after incremental 0 backup ... if run 'crosscheck backup'
it shows the previous as expired but when i issue 'list backup' it says available
what may be the problem.......
Backup volume is on RAID10 (ZFS on SOLARIS 10)
Thanks in advance !!
Regds
Gyanendra Singh

if run 'crosscheck backup'
it shows the previous as expired but when i issueHave u deleted the previous backup...........because according to my knowledge crosscheck command is used to validate any inconsistency between the logical and physical backup files.
'list backup' it says available
what may be the problem.......
List backup will show the previous backup because of the recovery window
Try this
crosscheck database
delete expired
list backup
and then see the result
Regards
Amit Raghuvanshi

Stock Posting List and Quantity in Warehouse show different quantities

Hi all,
I have an implementation running on 2007 Edition.
The case is that there is one item that shows different quantity on Stock Tab of Item Master Data and on Stock Posting List for a specific warehous*e. Specifically, on Stock Data of Item Master Data it shows 100 units and on Stock Posting List shows 254 as current Balance. So there is a difference of 154 units
I checked "Expanded" Menu of Stock Posting List in case any special selection was made but no transaction was excluded.
The only extra hint I have is that the difference of 154 is equal to a Stock Reconciliation Transaction that was made (without being sure that this is the cause).
From my point of view, Stock Posting List has the correct quantity and Onhand on Item Master Data shows 154 units less than the correct one
Has anyone faced this one before?
Thanks in advance
Gerasimos

Hi,
Please check Note No. : 1503919. A detect query is mentioned in the Note.
Kindly check the results obtained and if the Item detected is shown in the result obtained, you need to report the issue to SAP Support.
Kind Regards,
Jitin
SAP Business One Forum Team

Database ID is showing different host name in live cache backup

Hello All ,
While triggering the live cache backup , the database id is showing different one.
i have build the system using cloning method from production. the server name is showing correct one but database id still showing the source system.
Please help me to fix the issue . Thanks in advance .
Backlog is pasted below.
>backup_start LCD_DB_Backup
OK
Returncode              0
Date                    20140804
Time                    00081900
Server                  *********(showing correct hostname)
Database                LCD
Kernel Version          Kernel    7.9.08   Build 008-123-247-140
Pages Transferred       913824
Pages Left              0
Volumes                 1
Medianame               TH_LCD_DB_Backup
Location                /sapdb/LCD/backup/LCD_DB_Backup
Errortext
Label                   DAT_000000820
Is Consistent           true
First LOG Page          4981
Last LOG Page
DB Stamp 1 Date         20140804
DB Stamp 1 Time         00081900
DB Stamp 2 Date
DB Stamp 2 Time
Page Count              913803
Devices Used            1
Database ID             xxxxxx:LCD_20140803_103951 ( wrong database ID: xxxxx)
Max Used Data Page      0
Converter Page Count    991
Regards,

Hello,
I recommend you to create the SAP message to BC-DB-LVC component and get SAP support.
- How have you build the system using cloning method from production?
- What note/documens did you follow?
Regards, Natalia Khlopina

Show different content after every 5th web app listing

I have a web app that list products. I would like to show different content after 5th item from the web app.
So, it might look something like this.
<div class="wrapper article-single-wrapper">
Web app product 1
Web app product 2
Web app product 3
Web app product 4
Web app product 5
</div>
<div class="wrapper sponsored-post-list-wrapper">
Advert
</div>
<div class="wrapper article-single-wrapper">
Web app product 6
Web app product 7
Web app product 8
Web app product 9
Web app product 10
</div>

You can only do that with javascript, Say you had a hidden contentholder with the add on it. You could use jQuery for example, store the .html() into a variable and then every nth-item (4th) you could .insertAfter()

Why do copied files show different file sizes than the original files?

When I copy files (to another drive, folder, etc.) some show the same file size as the original, but others don't.
I'm guessing this is not abnormal, but what causes it?
Thanks.

Hi dymar,
Copying to another Drive is understandable, they may have a differentnumber of Blocks allocated per file, for insnce a one Byte file might take up 512 bytes, 1024 Bytes, etc, but a Get info should show the actual size of the file within that/those blocks.
If copying to another Format, like MS-DOS, Forks may be lost also.
There are ways to actually Compare the files...
http://www.hutsby.net/2008/01/apple-mac-osx-compare-files-and-folders.html
http://www.deltopia.com/compare-merge-sync/macosx/
http://www.macworld.com/article/49584/2006/03/cmpfldr.html
http://www.araxis.com/merge_mac/index.html
Or the most expensive one & my favorite, but far more useful, Tri-Backup...
http://www.tri-edre.com/english/tribackup.html

Mac, iPad and iPhone show different iCloud Drive content

I'm getting mad about iCloud drive.
For hours I try to get all my devices in sync. But they all show different content. In Finder I can see only 4 app folders containing the documents (actually pages, keynote, numbers and pdfexpert). Browsing the iCloud drive on the iPad for example using the pages app I can also see a GoodReader folder and some more. Some of them are empty folders (maybe empty folders are hidden on mac by default?) but some of them contain folders and files which obviously won't download to my Mac.
There are also some folders related to apps I removed from all my devices. It's ok if these app's iCloud folders stay in the cloud if they contain any documents but they stay there even if they are empty and there seems to be no way to remove these folders manually (even the web interface of iCloud greys out the trash when such a folder is selected).
When I use OS X Preferences to remove some old app's iCloud content I can do this for some of them but then (all of a sudden - can be after two of ten removals) the list on the left side shows only "Backups" (or sometimes "Backups" and an unspecific "Documents") and you have to close the Preferences and reopen it a little later to see the complete list again. And showing the app icons seems to be a problem too (including the iPad / iPhone preferences -> iCloud) - some of them are shown, for some of them there are only placeholders.
Am I doing it wrong or are these common problems?

Same problem here – specifically, the CONTENTS of "iCloud Drive" are different when accessed:
A) in the Finder on Yosemite
B) on the web at iCloud.com
C) on an iOS device
The MAJOR problem for me is that my Goodreader folder only shows up on the iOS device, making it impossible for me to access my Goodreader files. This is a huge issue for me as my workflow depends on having access to those files.
In general, however, it's ridiculous that you can copy data to iCloud Drive on your iOS device and then you cannot read that data anywhere else.

How can I use the print module to print different size images on one large "canvas"?

How can I use the print module to print different size images on one large "canvas"? An example would be in Photoshop, go to file>new, and create the size paper I want, and move images of different sizes onto it.
I was thinking the print module would do this automatically for me.

You can't, at present. It's been a requested feature, so we'll see if it shows up in a future version, but it's not there at present.

List backup; show different a different size to backup pieces

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for