LMS 4.2.3 Query on Interface utilization report

Hi All,
Interface Utilization report displays the interface utilization data for each device polled for the Interface Utilization
template. The information is presented using the percentage specifier.
For eg its displayed % (Rx Max%,Rx Avg%,RxMin%,
Tx Max%,Tx Avg%,TxMin%)
I wants report should have the data(interface utilization In Bytes of data)
Can we display the data instead of the percentage?? is it possible ???
Regards,
Channa

Hi Channa,
log into dbreader using the following::
http://servername : 1741/dbreader/dbreader.html
or
https:// servername : 443/dbreader/dbreader.html
user Id is DBA
Database Name is upm
password :: user defined (by default password is c2ky2k)
1.       Here is the query to get the pollerwise managed MIBObjects:
"select count (*), PollerName from Poller_Details_Table a,Poller_Definition_Table b where a.PollerId = b.PollerId and b.Poller_State NOT IN (1) Group by b.PollerName;"
2.       Here is the query to get the total mibobject count for the active pollers
“select count (*) from Poller_Details_Table a,Poller_Definition_Table b where a.PollerId =
b.PollerId and b.Poller_State NOT IN (1);”
Hope it will help
Thanks-
Afroz
***Ratings Encourages Contributors ***

Similar Messages

  • LMS 4.2 specific interface utilization report

          Hi,
    is there a way to create a interface utilization report only for a specific port? Like switch1->interface fa0/10
    Right now i can only choose all ports from a device?
    Thank you.
    Chris

    So, the new weekly report does not show the high Utilizations anymore, but there is a new problem:
    In the "Report Details", there are 7 devices and 126 interfaces, but in the "Interface Utilization Summary", there are only 49 Interfaces.
    I have added a screenshot, so that you can see, what I mean.

  • HUM Interface utilization report error

    Hi Joe,
         I have LMS 3.1 installed at one of our client site.
    In HUM they are pulling the interface utilization repor
    t for routers. we are observing the utilization valu
    es comming in the reports are false. the values are in bytes/sec fomat. lets there is a link of 1 GbPS in one of my device. if i am converting the TX utilization in to Gbps it becames 4.04 Gbps. how it is possible that the tx load will reach to 4 Gbps on a 1 Gb link?
    Please help me.
    Regards,
    Satya

    You need to upgrade to 1.1.2 to get 64-bit support which is required for such high-speed interfaces.  This can be downloaded at http://www.cisco.com/cgi-bin/tablebuild.pl/cw2000-hum .

  • Interafce utilization report in lms 3.1

    Hi I have installed LMS 3.1 at ine of our customer. when we are extracting interface utilization report(HUM interface report) It gives me the graphs which are in format of packets/second or value in % . Customer want a simple report which will give him the graps in bite or Kb per second. even if when the operator will pull the report the report should be generated simplly port utilization for both RX and tx in Kb or Mb insted of octate/packets per second.
    Is it possible ? if it is possible please guide me how to configure the report template.

    Hi Joe,
    Can you clarify if this is correct
    ( Avg % Rx + Avg % TX ) x Total Bandwidth configured on interface/100 = Total Bandwidth Utilization 
    For eg:  Avg % Rx=11
                Avg % Tx=11
                Interface= Gigaethernet 1/1
                Bandwidth 465000
    Bandwidth= 465000= 46.5 Mbps
    Now Applying formula = (11+11) x 46.5/ 100 = 10.23 Mbps i.e actual interface utilization
    Regards
    Gautam

  • Generate Prime Interface Availability and Utilization Report for unified APs

    Hi,
    I´m trying to generate interface availability and interface utilization report for unified APs on Prime Infrastructure 2.0, but it doesn´t display any information. I have created device health and interface health templates under desing/Monitor configuration/My templates and deployed under Deploy/Monitoring deployment, but it still don´t show any information,
    thaks for your help.

    Hi Alejandro,
    Did you solve this problem? Or is it a bug?
    I face the some issue with you, I just run "Report/Report Launch Pad/Deivce/Interface Utilization"
    and then I create a report for interface utilization.
    But it display nothing when the report run finished.
    I ask some guys in this forum, they said maybe it's a PI2.1 bug.
    BR
    Frank

  • Prime Infrastructure (2.0) utilization report on port group possible?

    Hello
    I want to create an interface utilization report for a specific port group in PI, but can't see how to do that in the report setting. You only seem to be able to select a specific device or site rather than port group. Is it possible? Also, is it possible to put that on a dashlet?
    thanks for your help

    Thanks for that Mahavir
    Yes, I worked that out a little while ago, and can now see interface utilization by port group on the Performance > Network Interface page. I do have another question however (well two)....
    I wanted to add graph over time for the utilization to the detail dashboard, but nothing shows up, even though I see the utilization in the network interface page, so I'm sure the monitoring is deployed. Why is the data missing from the graphs?
    Also, I wanted to see interface packets per second graphs, but see that is not part of any default template, so I created a customer SNMP template from the IF-MIB to do this, but I can only deploy that against sites/devices or a list of interfaces, and not port groups. Why can't I deploy a customer SNMP template against a port group?
    thanks for your help

  • Customizing performance threshold for interface utilization in LMS 4.0

    Am running LMS 4.0, i want to customize performance threshold for interface utilization from the default 40% to x%, please help.

    Based on your other post, I think you're talking about Device Fault management.  You can go to Monitor > Fault Settings > Setup > Threshold Settings, and select the DFM > System Defined Groups > Interface and the interface type you want, then edit the thresholds for this group.  Change the default utilization threshold from 40% to your desired value.  Save your changes, then go to Monitor > Fault Settings > Setup > Apple Changes to apply them.

  • Query on interface

    I am getting "The parameter name [startDate] in the query's selection criteria does not match any parameter name defined in the query" error when querying on interface using TopLink 11g (11.1.3). The interface is implemented by many classes MyImplementationClass being one of them. The query works in TopLink 10g. Is this a bug in 11g? Thanks.
    Here is my code:
    +// subquery+
    ExpressionBuilder subqueryBuilder = new ExpressionBuilder();
    ReportQuery subQuery = new ReportQuery(MySubQueryClass.class, subqueryBuilder);
    +// Main read query+
    ReadAllQuery namedQuery1 = new ReadAllQuery(MyInterface.class);
    ExpressionBuilder expBuilder1 = namedQuery1.getExpressionBuilder();
    subQuery.addAttribute("primaryKey");
    subQuery.setSelectionCriteria(
    subqueryBuilder.get("operationDate").between(
    subqueryBuilder.getParameter("startDate"),
    subqueryBuilder.getParameter("endDate")).and(
    subqueryBuilder.get("primaryKey").equal(expBuilder1.get("primaryKey))));
    namedQuery1.setSelectionCriteria(expBuilder1.get("valueDate")
    +.between(expBuilder1.getParameter("startDate"),+
    expBuilder1.getParameter("endDate")).and(
    expBuilder1.get("primaryKey").notExists(subQuery)));
    namedQuery1.addArgument("startDate", java.sql.Date.class);+
    namedQuery1.addArgument("endDate", java.sql.Date.class);+
    // Stack trace
    DEBUG 15:52:54 - ClientSession(27122014)--Exception [TOPLINK-6094] (Oracle TopLink - 11g Release 1 (11.1.1.3.0) (Build 100323)): oracle.toplink.exceptions.QueryException
    Exception Description: The parameter name [startDate] in the query's selection criteria does not match any parameter name defined in the query.
    Query: ReadAllQuery(*myPackage.MyImplementationClass*)Local Exception Stack:
    Exception [TOPLINK-6094] (Oracle TopLink - 11g Release 1 (11.1.1.3.0) (Build 100323)): oracle.toplink.exceptions.QueryException
    Exception Description: The parameter name [startDate] in the query's selection criteria does not match any parameter name defined in the query.
    Query: ReadAllQuery(myPackage.MyImplementationClass)
    at oracle.toplink.exceptions.QueryException.parameterNameMismatch(QueryException.java:996)
    at oracle.toplink.internal.expressions.ParameterExpression.getValue(ParameterExpression.java:227)
    at oracle.toplink.internal.databaseaccess.DatabaseCall.translate(DatabaseCall.java:914)
    at oracle.toplink.internal.queryframework.DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.executeCall(DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.java:192)
    at oracle.toplink.internal.queryframework.DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.executeCall(DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.java:179)
    at oracle.toplink.internal.queryframework.DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.executeSelectCall(DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.java:250)
    at oracle.toplink.internal.queryframework.DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.selectAllRows(DatasourceCallQueryMechanism.java:583)
    at oracle.toplink.internal.queryframework.ExpressionQueryMechanism.selectAllRowsFromTable(ExpressionQueryMechanism.java:2483)
    at oracle.toplink.internal.queryframework.ExpressionQueryMechanism.selectAllRows(ExpressionQueryMechanism.java:2441)
    at oracle.toplink.queryframework.ReadAllQuery.executeObjectLevelReadQuery(ReadAllQuery.java:467)
    at oracle.toplink.queryframework.ObjectLevelReadQuery.executeDatabaseQuery(ObjectLevelReadQuery.java:874)
    at oracle.toplink.queryframework.DatabaseQuery.execute(DatabaseQuery.java:674)
    at oracle.toplink.queryframework.ObjectLevelReadQuery.execute(ObjectLevelReadQuery.java:835)
    at oracle.toplink.queryframework.ReadAllQuery.execute(ReadAllQuery.java:445)
    at oracle.toplink.internal.sessions.AbstractSession.internalExecuteQuery(AbstractSession.java:2265)
    at oracle.toplink.internal.sessions.AbstractSession.executeQuery(AbstractSession.java:1079)
    at oracle.toplink.internal.sessions.AbstractSession.executeQuery(AbstractSession.java:1063)
    at oracle.toplink.internal.sessions.AbstractSession.executeQuery(AbstractSession.java:1022)
    at oracle.toplink.descriptors.InterfacePolicy.selectAllObjectsUsingMultipleTableSubclassRead(InterfacePolicy.java:171)
    at oracle.toplink.queryframework.ReadAllQuery.executeObjectLevelReadQuery(ReadAllQuery.java:462)
    at oracle.toplink.queryframework.ObjectLevelReadQuery.executeDatabaseQuery(ObjectLevelReadQuery.java:874)
    at oracle.toplink.queryframework.DatabaseQuery.execute(DatabaseQuery.java:674)
    at oracle.toplink.queryframework.ObjectLevelReadQuery.execute(ObjectLevelReadQuery.java:835)
    at oracle.toplink.queryframework.ReadAllQuery.execute(ReadAllQuery.java:445)
    at oracle.toplink.internal.sessions.AbstractSession.internalExecuteQuery(AbstractSession.java:2265)
    at oracle.toplink.internal.sessions.AbstractSession.executeQuery(AbstractSession.java:1079)
    at oracle.toplink.internal.sessions.AbstractSession.executeQuery(AbstractSession.java:1063)
    at oracle.toplink.internal.sessions.AbstractSession.executeQuery(AbstractSession.java:1037)

    Try using the outer query for the parameters,
    change,
    subqueryBuilder.getParameter("startDate"),
    to,
    expBuilder1.getParameter("startDate"),
    If that does not work, try the query without the sub-query to determine if the sub-query is the cause.
    It could be a bug with the sub-query, if you can recreate it on EclipseLink you could log a bug, or contact Oracle support.
    James : http://www.eclipse.org/eclipselink/

  • Querying on interface

    I noticed that Kodo 3.3 supports query on interface - is it part of JDO 2.0
    persistent interface support? What else is implemented? Can we associate
    Interface with Implementation to do the rest of the staff?

    >I noticed that Kodo 3.3 supports query on interface - is it part of JDO 2.0
    persistent interface support? What else is implemented? Can we associate
    Interface with Implementation to do the rest of the staff?We've had querying on interfaces for a long time!
    The Kodo implementation is currently different than JDO 2, in that JDO 2
    requires you to explicitly list your persistent interfaces in metadata, along
    with which classes implement them. Kodo currently just dynamically tracks which
    persistent classes implement which interfaces, and turns any query on an
    interface into a query on the set of the implementing classes.

  • Query on Interface Descriptor

    Hi
    I have a simple question about querying on Interfaces.
    I have an interface called Entity, and 2 implementing classes called Service and ServiceProvider (mapped to tables Services (pk serviceId) and ServiceProviders (pk serviceProviderId)). serviceId and serviceProviderId have independent sequences. In Workbench, both classes are specified as implementing the Entity interface. The Entity interface currently specifies an accessor method getEntityId(), and entityId is a common query key for both classes.
    I want to query against the Entity interface to obtain a single instance, by knowing the entityId and class name.
    How can I formulate a readObject query so that Toplink generates the appropriate SQL:
    select * from services where serviceId = ? or
    select * from serviceProviders where serviceProviderId = ?
    Sorry for the trivial nature of this question - I can't find any examples of querying against interface descriptors in a search of tutorials or the developers guide. The developers guide simply says "If there are multiple implementors of the interfaces, the query returns instances of all implementing classes." and this sounds like it would translate to a UNION ALL SQL query.
    I also have in a separate class a variable one to one mapping where I can specify a class indicator (entityTypeId values). Somehow I feel that I need something like this for the Entity interface descriptor.
    James

    Frankly, this just isn't something that is done that often. In the past decade I can only think of a couple of customers who've asked me about this. I always feel a bit uncomfortable with how querying through interfaces really tends to break polymorphism -- it just doesn't seem very natural from an OO perspective. Now, if instead of an interface you had used a common superclass, that makes more sense. I guess the fact that interfaces don't have state makes this whole area a bit of an OOAD research topic. :)
    That being said, I don't expect TopLink would do an "or" query like you've shown, but would do a UNION.
    My recommendation is to experiement with the queries, perhaps take a look at query-keys (they may be of some help here), and contact support with any feature suggestions you have in this area.
    - Don

  • Cisco PI 2.1 can't display monitoring interface utilization result

    Hi Experts,
    Our company have a Cisco PI 2.1 system, I want to monitoring some router's interface utilization.
    I followed cisco prime training course to set up some config in cisco PI, but it's seemed to be not effective.
    There's no result can be displayed in PI,  I have no idea the root cause, can anyone help me with it?
    The config detail please refer to attachment.
    Thanks in advance,
    /Frank

    It's a VM.
    I chose the Express-Plus profile even though I could technically have used the Express profile for what they're managing. I always try to err on the side of more resources when building a management system. Getting a customer to adapt their workflow to properly leverage a NMS is hard enough without it also being a drag to use due to system sluggishness.
    We're also running it on a nice new shiny data center - UCS B240 series blade with fast storage on Netapp SAS disks and connected directly to the 7010 core (via the Fabric Interconnect of course).

  • ACE - Query VLAN Interfaces Status

    Hi,
    I am wondering what the status of the query vlan interface means in the command 'show ft peer detail':
    Query Vlan IF State          : UP, Manual validation - please ping peer
    I am pretty sure that I did not see this status when I configured query vlan last time. Current version is A2(2.3).
    Unfortunately this status does not seem to be documented anywhere on CCO.
    I appreciate any help!
    Thanks,
    Daniel

    Hi Daniel,
    The FT Query VLAN interface is an optional, yet very good, feature to be used when using redundant ACE modules or appliances. Without it, if the FT VLAN was to go down, the standby ACE will no longer receive FT heartbeats from the active ACE and therefore take the active role.  However, if the active ACE is still running fine in the active role, then you don't want the standby ACE to take over as active because that will put them into an active/active scenario, which may lead to connectivity issues.
    This is where the FT Query VLAN interface comes in.  If the FT VLAN goes down, the standby ACE will notice this, but before taking the active role, it will ping it's peer IP address configured on the interface that is designated as the FT Query VLAN.  If the ping is successful, then it will stay in the standby role, thereby saving you some headaches.
    The status that you are seeing is the ACE's way of telling you that the interface is UP, but if you want to know if it can successfully ping the peer IP address, then you would have to manually ping the peer IP address from the CLI.  The ACE does not periodically check the ping connectivity through any automatic mechanism.  The automatic mechanism is only triggered by the FT VLAN going down.
    Does this help?
    Sean

  • High VLAN Interface utilization (6500/sup720)

    Can anyone tell me why a VLAN interface would show 100% utilization for a givin VLAN? This is a sup720 we're talking about.
    I understand that the bandwidth of a virtual interface is 1Gig but I thought this was more related to routing metric.
    Users were actually seeing performance issues until we changed how the servers on this particular interface were replicating. Once we did this the VLAN interface utilization went down and performance went up.
    It doesn't make sense to me that the VLAN interface would limit the actual throughput of the various ports that are mapped to it. Throughput should be related to the switch module 61xx, 65xx, 67xx and how it interfaces to the backplan and the backplan speed itself.
    Any insights would be helpful......

    If the layer 3 SVI was showing 100% that means it had a lot of traffic that was being layer 3 processed switched instead of hardware switched . Normally most traffic is hardware switched within the ASICS and never even gets passed up to that layer . What would cause this I'm not sure .

  • Query/Read Interface for API

    Is there a query/read interface from the HRMS API's or from the TCA API's?
    We are using customers online to maintain data , but I want to have a custom application to view the data.
    Obvious choice would be through the TCA API's but I cannot find any Query/Read Interfaces there.
    Oracle's Docs seem to say it's possible so could somebody point me in the right direction please
    cheers
    Dominic

    Anyone have any idea of it ?

  • Interface VLAN Bandwidth Utilization Reporting

    I am currently evaluating a few products for Network Management and Monitoring. The question i have is, how is % utilization calculated for a virtual interface? Some tools have reported that one of our interface vlans is at 320% utilization. Obviously, this is not accurate. If anyone can give me advice on how to accurately report interface utilization percentage on a virtual interface, I would appreciate it.

    No, changing the vlan speed will not influence the physical interface's speed.
    So, no need for that.
    HTH

Maybe you are looking for