Loading freight cost to inventory at the time of GR

Dear All
When i am not using LE then i do have process where i will be having a condition type of freight at STO type , I shall do delivery(VL10D) against that PO number, PGI and at the time of GR at receiving plant that freight will get uploaded to material which is having price control " V ". Now as I am using LE my freight will be calculated at VI01(freight cost calculation) , there will not be any condition type of freight at PO level . Now I want that(VI01) freight to get uploaded on material .That means some how my VI01 document will be linked to PO and I guess this is possible by doing configuration at " Shipment Cost Item Categories " .Please provide me solution if this can be done or give me any other alternate . I am running late so please do help me.
Best Regards
Parveen Kr Thakur
9309460061

The issue is resoleved.
We can load freight cost using LE on inventory in inbound shipment as well as in STO.
Config steps are :
1. Settlement rel. = A relevant for settlement (delivery costs) in T_56
2. In pricing schema of PO : condition catagory shud be " delivery relevent "
3. check "accurals" check box and "copy shipment cost" check in condition type .
4. Make condition type manual at PO level .Important to note the value of this condition type at the time of PO creation should be blank.
5. After shipment cost calculation check the shipment status .it shud b " C ".
6. At MIGO check ur accounting doc
Best Regards
Parveen Kr Thakur

Similar Messages

Loading freight cost on inventory

Dear All
I am implementing LE .Our client want freight charges to get uploaded on inventory during STO. Will any-one please help me to get rid of this problem , I want urgent solution for this .
Best Regards
Parveen Kumar Thakur

Hi,
Apology, I am not clear what do you require from your reply message about those items you have listed. Did you want to understand what they are or did you want to know what configuration settings to maintain for those? Those settings are dependent on your requirements.
1) Cost Distribution - this settings explains the different method possible for apportionment of the cost during settlement (Transfer to CO) - which you can select from Shipment Cost Item, Delivery or Delivery Items.
2) Acct. Assignment Cat. - It allows you to settle the cost to various accounts - used in account determination in tcode OBYC (GBB - > VBR). Where those are setup, the desired account is determined in the shipment cost document.
3) Origin of CO - This is used to determine where the origin of the CO object should be determined from. The selection provides you various sequences, which you can possibly use. It is possible directly through a G/L Account, through the sequence of Delivery, then if not found, it will determine from Order and finally through the sequence of Delivery, Order and G/L Account.
4) Relevant for settlement - In this case, depending on your requirement you can consider the option of settling through a G/L account or through the delivery costs method (which is detailed in "a" and "b" below). Otherwise, the settings commonly used is "X".
And, I am not sure what is your real intention here, but definitely you can generate PO to forwarding agent simultaneously, and then perform MIRO against the forwarding agent/shipment cost document/PO. It depends on your requirement, and in some instances, a company can have an agreement with the customer or vendor that the transportation cost is to be borne by them along with the materials procured or sold.
Hence, there are three possible methods the shipment cost can be handled:
a) The cost is to be included in the PO for the material (which I have just explained above)
b) The cost is to be included in the Billing document for the customer (in the case of Sales scenario)
c) The cost is to be handled separately in a shipment cost document --> Freight PO --> Payment to Forwarding Agent (which is the common practice by many).
Hope the above helps.
Thanks.

How to Load Revalued Assets in FA at the time of Data Conversion

Dear Experts,
How to Load Revalued Assets in FA at the time of Data Conversion?? Please help me
Thanks & Regards
Laxman

Let me ask agagin to all experts.
I want to make A condition to be repriced at the time of billing.
For this, I have to set condition category as 'L' (Generally new when copying).
But I do not want to do in that way becauuse I am maintaining big operated system now.
In addition, though I migrate open orders after changing config. as 'L', it is almost impossible for use to migrate because we have more than a thound open orders per a DAY as Globalized system.
That is why I am asking.
Simply I can create new condition but as I mentioned, there are various recycling fee so we already created about 10 conditions. And this recycling conditions are linked to REA package of SAP. So creating another 10 more conditions can not be a way for us.
At last, what I want is not to be shown this condition only in billing doc.
'A' condition should be displayed in both Sales order and Billing doc.
And simultaneously, when the billing is created and if user changed 'A' condition master, then new value which is different from sales order have to be reflected in billing doc.
Thank you in advance.

Drop Shipments costing of Inventory using the average method.

How does the system handles the costing of inventory using the average method during dropshipments?
One of my prospects uses average costing method for the accounting of their inventory. The issue now is, how does the system compute s for the cost since the goods/inventory is delivered directly by the supplier to the customer? What is the basis for the amount to be posted in COGS? Thanks!
null

For Drop shipments two inventory movements are still performed. When the goods are initially received (albeit logically), Oracle Inventory immediately issues them out of stock again - just as if you had ship confirmed them. Therefore you inventory accounting is also the same, and will use the purchase price of the goods as the inventory value.

I have used fire fox for a long time but have nothing but problems loading web sites..i think the time has come to uninstall firefox and go with internet explore..im tired of wasting my time trying to load web pages.

Question
i have used fire fox for a long time but have nothing but problems loading web sites..i think the time has come to uninstall firefox and go with internet explore..im tired of wasting my time trying to load web pages.

does not solve problem..guess i'll have to get rid of firefox..never had problen before but to much hassle loading web sites.

Document missed in Inventory at the time of INIT

Hello,
In Inventory Cube 0IC_C03 we took INIT on 16.Oct.08 at approx 11:56 am.
After a long time today we saw that Closing amount for a particular material is not matching with that of R/3.
When analysed, we found that One material Document was posted on 16.oct.08 at 12:20 pm (the time when we were taking INIT).
Quantity against that document number was pulled into BW but anyhow Amount was left. That day it was first entry for that material also. Now due to absence of Amount againt that Document No., our closing Amount is not matching.
How can we pull the missed Amount without duplicationg other data against that Documnet no. which was already pulled at the time of INIT.
Thanks & Regards
Shilpi Gupta

Hi,
It will be based upon the standard cost at the date of return, if material master has been controlled with moving average price
If the material master has been controlled with standard price, the price doesn't change.
Regards,

CacheLoader load() method is getting invoked all the time

The cache.get() method invokes the CacheLoader load() method if the key is not present in the cache.
But the key is present in the cache already and when ever i invoke cache.get() it is invoking the load() method to get the data from DB.
The expiry delay is also not met but still it invokes load() method all the time when the cache.get() method is invoked.
Please let me know what is the issue with this?
because it is connecting to DB from the load() method all the time even the key is in the cache. This will be an over head.

Please find the contents of coherence cache config file below,
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE cache-config SYSTEM "cache-config.dtd">
<cache-config>
<caching-scheme-mapping>
<cache-mapping>
<cache-name>DBBackedAccessoryCache</cache-name>
<scheme-name>distributed-db-backed</scheme-name>
</cache-mapping>
</caching-scheme-mapping>
<caching-schemes>
<distributed-scheme>
<scheme-name>distributed-db-backed</scheme-name>
<service-name>DistributedCache</service-name>
<backing-map-scheme>
<read-write-backing-map-scheme>
<internal-cache-scheme>
     <local-scheme>
     <expiry-delay>10h</expiry-delay>
     <flush-delay>4h</flush-delay>
     <high-units>250M</high-units>
     </local-scheme>
</internal-cache-scheme>
<cachestore-scheme>
<class-scheme>
<class-name>DBAccessoryLoader</class-name>
</class-scheme>
</cachestore-scheme>
<read-only>true</read-only>
<refresh-ahead-factor>1.0</refresh-ahead-factor>
</read-write-backing-map-scheme>
</backing-map-scheme>
<listener/>
<autostart>true</autostart>
</distributed-scheme>
</caching-schemes>
</cache-config>

Query cost is low but the time taken is high

Hi,
I have tuned the queries which now are costing the CPU low. But the time taken is still higher (of order of 999,999,999.0)
What is scope of improvement ?
Regards,
Chitwanjit

Moderator message - Please ask a specific question - post locked
Rob

Applications loading and running in background all the time

Lately my Macbook Pro seems to be running apps in the background and installing. It makes the working noises the Macbook makes when the processors are working. Quite often when I shut it down it asks me if I want to abort installation. I keep having to manually remove 'com.wondershare.mobilegodaemon' from the Console, but it comes right back when I reboot. Mobile go is the phone android app to connect your phone to the laptop. I also recently purchased Adobe software on the cloud.
Is there anyway to prevent apps from updating or working in the background while I work? It is annoying when I am working on a project, the laptop begins to howl and will not stop.
Can I remove all the files from the Launch Daemon and Launch Folders in the Library folder?
Do I have some kind of virus or infection?
Please help! Thank you.

FJLLORE wrote:
I deleted android wondershare a few weeks ago.
You didn't do it right, it seems. For the future, follow proper uninstall procedures:
How to uninstall software
As for where the remaining files that didn't get removed are located, I have no idea. The fact that you are able to temporarily disable it with launchctl says at least one of them will be in one of the LaunchAgents or LaunchDaemons folders on your computer, either in the root-level Library folder or the invisible one in your user folder (hold down option and choose Library from the Go menu in the Finder to open that one). However, for all I know there may be other files related to Wondershare located elsewhere as well.
Rather than randomly hunting around for these files, I'd recommend looking for the official Wondershare uninstaller and trying that. You may need to reinstall it in order to remove it at this point, since you only have a partial install left.
I have run Adwaremedic and I have run Mackeeper to no avail.
AdwareMedic will not remove Wondershare, because that's not adware. AdwareMedic only removes adware.
MacKeeper is garbage that should never be used. You need to remove that immediately! For more on why, see:
Ongoing MacKeeper fraud
(Fair disclosure: I may receive compensation from links to my sites, TheSafeMac.com and AdwareMedic.com.)

Inbound Logistics: What are the best options to capture freight costs?

We attempted to implement a freight payables solution which was built on Inbound Deliveries> Inbound Shipments> Inbound Shipment Cost Documents. The PO line items were flagged with a conf.control key which made the above inbound documents relevant.
Very long story short, we had to remove this functionality because of two major issues:
1.     The Inbound Deliveries were created with incorrect quantities some of the time. When the Inbound Deliveries were created with incorrect quantity those errors caused major problems (e.g., over accrual of freight cost to the tune of several millions of dollars!!!).
2.     Also, when the Inbound Deliveries were created with incorrect quantity MRP went berserk (e.g., when the IB delivery has the wrong quantity that shows up in MD04 and the planners are left scratching their heads wondering why the supplier is shipping so much or so little).
I wonu2019t get into the details of how the Inbound Deliveries were being created but suffice to say they were manually entered by the supplier without the benefit of an EDI transaction- it was more of a manual entry- hence the data accuracy problem.
The point of this post is to gain feedback from other customers who have implemented an inbound freight payables solution with success & understand what processes were used to make your project successful.
For example, if I had a u201Cwish listu201D Iu2019d request the following:
1.     The IB delivery document type Iu2019d like to use should be non-MRP relevant. This will eliminate the confusion that occurred when planners run MD04 and see all of the shipment notifications. Also, if the MIGO_GR transaction is used to receive the POu2019s, they will see the quantities on the PO, not on the IB delivery. This would be good for us from a business continuity stand point. However, if the IB delivery is not MRP relevant, than your GR does not accrue the freight cost defined on the SCD which short circuits the entire point of having these documents.
u2022     Q: Have you had any success implementing an IB freight solution with minimum impact to planning / inventory / operations?
2.     As mentioned above, the data accuracy of the IB delivery was problematic. Because of this issue we have changed our thinking so that we would require a EDI ASN to be sent from our supplier to our SAP system. Using EDI we feel that greater accuracy would be obtained since the quantities defined would map to what is being picked or at least aligned with what we would expect to be invoiced for. The problem is we donu2019t know how EDI capable our suppliers are.
u2022     Q: Has anyone had success implementing this with your suppliers on a large scale?
3.     Are there other inbound freight payment solutions that Iu2019m not thinking about u2013 custom or other that you have implemented & can share some of the specifics about? Iu2019d enjoy hearing about them. Since we are re-thinking what we implemented Iu2019m open to any suggestions.
Thanks so much for your time!
Rich Wortmann

Chandra,
Thank you for your reply. I'm aware of the freight condition approach you suggest & the ability to define the carrier in the freight condition.
We explored this functionality in the past. The problem/limitations we've experienced were as follows:
1. Essentially you have to know your freight cost & the carrier by PO line item at the time the PO is created. Both of these variables we typically cannot predict in our environment.
2. We have a lot of situations where the PO is considered a u201Cblanketu201D where it will remain open for a month up to a year. Knowing the entire freight cost for these PO's once they are created is impossible to predict so to support the freight conditions we would have to change our business process which would be a big effort for our organization.
3. Our suppliers ship product based on multiple PO's / PO lines, again it is impossible to predict what the per unit freight cost would be at the time a PO is generated.
These factors are what led us to the IB delivery solution which handles each one of these scenarios quite well provided you have good data when the IB delivery is created.
Regarding your second post: Thanks! This information is helpful.
Sincerely,
Rich Wortmann

Reducing the Freight cost on material value for undelivered material

Hi Experts,
Summary : The material supplier vendor needs to be paid for full quantity of material. The freight transport is allowed an under tolearance of 0.5% on the material to be supplied. If the delivered material quantity breaches the 0.5% under tolerance then amount at 1.5 times the cost of material for the shortage is to be deducted from the transporter. A dummy GR will have to be prepared for the undelivered quantity for which we do not want the freight cost to be loaded. The details scenario is mentioned below :-
We have to make a Purchase Order with material code say ABC for procured of some material. Suppose we make a Purchase Order for 100 nos. at a Unit Price of Say Rs. 10/- for Material Code ABC on say Vendor M/s XYZ. A freight condition is maintained in the Conditions Tab and suppose the Freight is Rs. 10 per unit of the material.
While preparing the Goods Receipt through MIGO, in the Freight Tab we select say freight vendor say M/s PQR against the freight condition and post the goods receipt.
While doing Invoice Processing in MIRO, when we enter the combination of Purchase Order and Planned Delivery Cost the system will populate the vendor codes of both the supplier of material and the transporter. On selecting the transporter the freight amount will populate against which the invoice of the tranporter can be processed.
In the Vendor Master of M/s XYZ GR-Based Invoice Verification is activated.
The vendor is allowed an under tolerance of 0.5% (i.e. the vendor should deliver at least 99.50 nos. of the Purchase Order). If the vendor delivers 99.50 or more then there will be no deduction in the freight charges.
But suppose the vendor delivers only 99.4 nos. of the quantity. Then we will prepare the GRIR for 99.4 nos.only. But while processing the MIRO we need to deduct 1.5 times the value of the material from the freight amount for the shortshipped quantity, i.e.
0.1 no (99.5 u2013 99.4) X Rs. 10/- * 1.5 = Rs. 1.5 are to be deducted from the final payment from the freight amount of the transporter.
The material supplier will have to be paid in full 100 nos. of quantity and will raise an invoice for 100 nos. A dummy GRIR for the 0.6 nos. of undelivered material will have to be prepared for processing the invoice for the 100 nos. of the material supplier and a dummy issue for 0.6 nos. of undelivered material will be prepared to remove them from the system.
Hence the freight cost for this 0.6 nos. of undelivered material will also go into the cost of the material and increase the MAP by that amount. Also the goods issue Cost will also have the effect of the freight cost.
We do not want to load the freight cost for the undelivered material in the value of the material.
Can any one please suggest a solution for the same.
Thanks in advance.
AJ.

Hi
A PO Will be raised for full quantity of material say 100 nos.
The material supplier vendor needs to be paid for full quantity of material.
A freight vendor is maintained at the time of GR for material against the freight condition maintained in the Po.
The freight vendor facilitates the delivery of the material from the vendor to the purchaser for which he is given an under tolerance limit of 0.5%. Any delivery below this tolerance limit, freight amount to the effect of 1.5 times the per unit rate of material x short fall below 0.5% tolerance will be deducted from the freight amount.
A dummy grir will have to be prepared for the short delivered quantity for processing the invoice for the full quantity of the purchase order, as the vendor is going to raise the invoice for full purchase order quantity. The client does not want to load the freight cost of the undelivered quantity on the material value as it will wrongly show the MAP of the material. This shortshipped material will be issued to remove it from the system and the stock will remain for the delivered quantity only. The vendor is subject to gr based invoice verification.
Please suggest a solution.
Thanks in advance.
AJ
The freight transport is allowed an under tolearance of 0.5% on the material to be supplied. If the delivered material quantity breaches the 0.5% under tolerance then amount at 1.5 times the cost of material for the shortage is to be deducted from the transporter. A dummy GR will have to be prepared for the undelivered quantity for which we do not want the freight cost to be loaded.

Report on Shipment/Freight Costs

Dear Forum,
We are following the process whereby the Shipment/Freight costs are included in the POs as conditions. At the time of Goods Receipt, as per the standard procedure, the Shipment/Freight Costs are loaded on to the materal costs of the Inventories received. Now there is a requirement to monitor the Shipment/Freight Costs and a report is required to be generated which would give the material costs as well as the Shipment/Freight costs. How can we generate the same?
Your help would be highly appreciated.
Regards

>
raj n wrote:
> Dear Forum,
>
> We are following the process whereby the Shipment/Freight costs are included in the POs as conditions. At the time of Goods Receipt, as per the standard procedure, the Shipment/Freight Costs are loaded on to the materal costs of the Inventories received. Now there is a requirement to monitor the Shipment/Freight Costs and a report is required to be generated which would give the material costs as well as the Shipment/Freight costs. How can we generate the same?
>
> Your help would be highly appreciated.
>
> Regards
You can use MB51(Amount in LC,101 mvmt type) for material cost.
Find shipment / freight cost using FBL3N report for required g/l account.

Add freight cost in a cross company code scenario using a costing sheet

Dear Forum,
I will like to add freight cost to a material using a costing sheet. The freight percentage is very easy to add and works fine when the cost is added in the company code costing. My problems start when I want to add the freight in the cross-company code costing. I want to setup a cross-company code costing where the freight cost is added to the material in the buying company code and not on the selling company code. The cross-company code costing is setup using special procurement costing keys.
In below costing (CK11N) the procurement costing key is not used.
From the itemization it is shown that purchase info.record 5300067643 is read and the price of 12,97 is determined. There is added 10% in freight coming from the costing sheet.
The freight is shown in the cost component structure as well.
The special procurement type is now changed from ‘20’ to ‘AT´ on the MRP2 screen in the material master. The procurement is now pointing to an internal plant called ‘DCN’.
The costing of material 105050 is now repeated. I get the expected result from changing the procurement key, as I can now see the material is sourced from plant ‘DCN’. DCN is sourcing the material from BJ07, but that is not relevant for the example.
If I now look at the itemization again on the costing in BGA1 I now see that the price is not coming from the info.record. It is the costing in DCN that is used.
I will still like to add the freight cost in BGA1.
How do I add freight cost in BGA1 when I at the same time want to have the costing to be taken from plant DCN?
Please let me know if you need additional information on the customizing setup of the system.
Best regards,
Kim Hjorth Poulsen

Hi Srinu,
Thank You for a prompt feedback.
I have tried to follow Your advise. The special procurement costing key is customized like below.
I have updated the special procurement costing key on the costing 1 view of the material master. When costing the material it is using the special procurement key. This can be seen from the qty. structure tab in CK11N.
It is also costing cross company as intended.
The itemization looks like below.
and the cost component structure looks like below.
Unfortunately the freight is not added in the costing in BGA1.
I noticed that when the costing is made without special procurement key the costing sheet used in the costing is for material components. If the costing is made with the special procurement keys the costing sheet used is for finished and semi-finished materials. The customizing in both of the costing sheets are the same, but only when costing is without the special procurement keys the freight is added.
So unfornutely Your suggestion did not solve the problem.
Best regards,
Kim

Re: Freight Cost during MIRO

Dear All,
Need help...I configured the following steps in order to capture freight cost during MIRO. but during MIRO,
the GL account captured/defaulted to freight cost is same as the expense accnt instead of the freight cost account..
eg. Expense -1111
      Freight   -2222
      Vendor - 3333
Created 1 PO and maintain the ff:
PO is 1 line item 1pc=1000
ZFR1 - Condition type for Freight cost = 200
At the time of MIRO ( we dont have GR processing),the screen display 2 line item for the expense and freight cost but the GL account defaulted in the freight cost is same as expense account instead of the freight account. then if do a simulate, the following are the entry (which is wrong)
Vendor   1111                 1200
Expense   3333              1000(-)
Expense   3333                200(-)          * supposed to charge to my freight accnt 2222
below step i configured.
created new condition type ZFR1 (copying std FR1B)
put B- Delivery cost and tick 'Accrual' in the settings
maintain transaction event ZFR and posting key
assigned GL acccount to ZFR
include the condition type ZFR1 in the calculation schema, put ZFR in the field 'accrual'
Appreciate all your advise. many thanks in advance.
Rgds,
She

Hi,
Check your OBYC settings whether you have assigned the correct GL for the new trans Key.
Regards,

PO-Freight cost (header, diff currency with items) not distributed when GR

Dear Gurus,
I've one PO with freight cost at header level (1000 VND). In the PO, this freight amount shown to be distributed successfully to line item (value base, line item 1 is 300 VND, line item 2 is 700 VND). But when doing GR, the freight cost of each line item is NOT distributed but equals the total freight amount (line item 1 is 1000 VND, line item 2 is 1000 VND).
In this PO, vendor is international vendor, goods in USD. Freight cost is in local currency (VND)
The configuration for this freight cost condition is at Header level, Group Condition ticked; Calculation type: Fixed Amount; Scale Basis: Value. When the currency of freight cost and goods are the same (all in USD), I have no error as above.
Please help to solve this issue.
Thanks.

Hi
I am facing the same problem in my client. It would be great if you can share how you resolved the issue of Freight Cost
Regards
Athar

Loading freight cost to inventory at the time of GR

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for