Long time buyer truly disappointed - My bad experience

On 10/28/2014 I bought a Sound bar, 75” TV and a 2 year warranty for roughly $7,100 at the Best Buy location in Arden-Fair, Sacramento, CA 95819. The sales rep who sold me the TV was named Jesse and was very helpful and professional, he made my decision easy after doing a lot of research shopping around at Costco, Fry’s, Amazon. I also scoured through social media review sites like Yelp determining the best place to purchase.
Having shopped with Best Buy since I was a kid I was already a bit biased and leaning towards Best Buy, I’ve purchased many products without issue. I’ve bought numerous laptops, multiple game consoles, many many games, CD’s, DVD’s over the years and just recently opened up a Best Buy credit card.
The $7,100 purchase went smoothly at first, I could have got an early delivery date but because of me and my wife’s busy work schedules the early dates would not work. I decide to have the TV delivered on Nov. 5th, 2014, a week from when the purchase was made. The night before the delivery was supposed to take place I received a confirmation email and a phone call saying the delivery was on schedule and that it would be delivered on time between 8am and 10am on Nov. 5th. Two hours later while we were sleeping and not tell the next morning did I see that an email was sent at 10pm on the 4th stating the delivery had been pushed back 3 days to the weekend which wouldn’t work with our work schedules.
The frustration began to set in after having waited a week for the delivery and knowing realistically it would need to be another week before receiving the product we paid for due to our schedules. To be honest, we felt Best Buy was very inconsiderate after having a week to make sure this sale was completed. I did not expect this lack of courtesy from a big reputable chain. We began to assume they sold the TV set aside for us because they had already made the sale, who cares about us right?
That morning when I read the delivery date change in my email we decided to call Best Buy to figure out why the delivery had been pushed back, the Store wasn’t open so we called the generic number for the Call Center. The first lady we spoke to said the TV was not in stock and transferred our call to the store which we knew was closed and therefore dumped our call. The second lady we spoke to said that instead of the Saturday delivery date she could change it to Thursday but that she could not guarantee the delivery date would be met and could be subject to change, which we assumed would happen and this was her way of getting rid of our call for the time being. She also stated that she would contact us back if the delivery date changed which later that night it was changed again at 10pm by email without previous notice.
Luckily, we didn’t fall for the gimmick, my wife and I decided to wait until the Arden store opened up to call and speak to a manager, we were able to get through at around 10:30am on the 5th and spoke to one, He told us that the TV that was supposed to be delivered was damaged and that they did not want to deliver us a bad TV. We assumed this was just a bad excuse and cover up for bad service and error which our thoughts were reaffirmed later. We told the manager that we were debating whether to just cancel the order and buy our TV somewhere else. The manager wanted some time to call us back and did so with a few options, one of which was to pick up a TV from another store and have it delivered to our house the following day. After much consideration we said yes and decided if they could get us the TV the next day then everything was settled. Later that day he called and gave us a time window on the delivery and we felt better about the situation.
Thursday Nov. 6th rolled around and the TV is delivered, the box the TV came in looked like it had been tossed around like a football. The bottom of the box had the TV falling out, the corner of the box was ripped open and the Styrofoam inside was smashed and torn in multiple places. Best Buy may make a lot of sales but for a big purchase like this for me and my wife, we expected better from Best Buy and were so disappointed. If what was true about the previous undelivered TV being damaged, how and or why would they attempt to deliver this TV to us when the outside of the box looked horrible, granted the TV may have been just fine but how do we know if the TV was even brand new and not used or a display? To add insult to injury, even the delivery guys felt bad and were apologetic saying sorry and that they just deliver as if they knew it wasn't right.
I called and talk with the store manager, took photos of the box, and after a lengthy decision with the store manager decided to cancel my order and have them come back up the product which I hadn’t moved or touched. I was so dissatisfied by the service I don’t think I’ll ever see Best Buy the same. They made no effort to right the wrong, but instead used sending an employee to pick up another TV at another store as if they were doing us a favor, it is Best Buy who didn’t honor the delivery time and the sale of a product with horrible reasoning.
The worst part is, is that my wife and I are good people, we understand that mistakes can happen, why at the last minute did this occur? Why we were not informed earlier? We didn’t treat their managers or employees bad, we didn’t yell, we didn’t throw a fit, we simply wanted the product that we purchased to be delivered a week later on time, in good condition. Making a big purchase like this and seeing the condition the box was in, felt like we went to a car lot and bought a used car for the price of a brand new one.
The store manager could of done plenty more to keep our business, not that we expected to get anything at this point after being so disappointed. But from a business perspective to keep a big sale, the manager could of up'd our 2 year warranty to 5 year warranty on them to make me feel better about the box, I probably would of kept my purchase had she done that, or let me buy the TV as what it appeared, an open box item. A lot could of been done to keep the sale and at the end of the day no effort was made. Whatever happened to getting what you paid for? I paid for a brand new TV to be delivered a week later, then told after confirmation and at the last minute my TV wasn't in stock and/or it was damaged and they cared so much about me to deliver a TV the next day in an open box that looked like it had been ran over by a truck a few times. (I have photos to remind me, some day I might look back and laugh)
I know that we are but a dot on a map in terms of the customer database, however if our feedback helps someone avoid the situation we had, then we will have felt this long and probably boring post was worth submitting. Here’s hoping I have a better TV buying experience elsewhere, I think I’m done shopping at Best Buy, I have no reason or purpose to shop at a store where I could previously spend hours in shopping and looking at all the latest and greatest new electronics. As a long time buyer, Best Buy let me down.
Why should I ever do business there? I had dinner at a food court with friends just last night and they wanted to walk over to Best Buy and look around, long story short after telling them my story we walked through the mall instead. I'm slightly embarassed by how passionately I'm against Best Buy right now but feel it's very much justified. A huge store like this should care more about their customers, right the wrong.

Hello Stanfield,
As someone who watches more television than she probably should, having the best TV possible is crucial to any viewing experience. If you ask me, watching a show on a 75” 4K TV would be mind-blowing, so I’m glad our Arden-Fair associate, Jesse, found you one at an unbeatable price. That’s why it’s so disappointing to hear your experience quickly down spiraled into disaster when a missed appointment turned into receiving a damaged TV, which lead to a canceled order. I assure you this is not indicative of the experience we seek to provide our customers, and we certainly can’t afford for this to be repeated considering the many competitive choices customers have today.
While unforeseen complications can cause unexpected delays for delivery on our end, these are far and few between, and we should be making every attempt to contact you when rescheduling is necessary. Emailing you is one way we do this; however, it’s less than ideal to communicate this to you so late the night before your scheduled delivery date.  It’s clear to me that we may not have ironed out all of these kinks yet, and I’m very sorry it has been at your expense.
Despite not having your TV in stock at the time of your original delivery date, other options may be available to us to make sure you receive your purchase at a timely manner. This could mean exchanging the particular model for a comparable one in stock to locating the TV with another warehouse or store location. Finding your TV in another store should have been a happy occasion and a great solution to your predicament; I’m sure it was beyond frustrating to find the replacement in less than pristine condition. It’s rare to receive a damaged item during delivery, but should this happen, we should be making every attempt possible to assist you, even if this means returning the purchase upon request.
However, it’s clear to me that you took considerable time to let us know of your experience, and I appreciate you providing us this feedback. Please know that I’ve documented your concerns here at the corporate office so that we may review this with the appropriate teams for future coaching opportunities. Should you have any further questions or concerns, or wish to provide us a second chance to change your opinion of us, please feel free to let me know. I’ll be glad to see what options we may have available to you.
Best wishes,
Alex|Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
 Private Message

Similar Messages

  • Long Time Mac User Disappointed.

    I have always been a Mac supporter. In fact, I am currently on my 10th Mac after buying my first one, A Mac Classic, in 1990, for around $5500. Since then, I have continued to update every few years and I have never been disappointed in the product Apple sells until my most recent Mac, the iMac G5. I purchased this machine almost three years ago to the day. Over the course of these three years, I have had to pay more in repairs than any other Mac I have ever owned. And, to make matters worse, after doing research over the internet, I find that the problems I have encountered are known issues with this model. I had to replace the Superdrive as, apparently, there were a number of machines (like mine) that had a certain drive put in that fizzled after just a year or so (after warranty expiration). So, I spent good money to get that replaced, had to pay to have it done, too as MY model was the model that could not be opened and repaired by the owner. It needed to be done by an authorized technician. Now it's the power supply, an know issue in a good number of models made literally WEEKS before mine. Apple did a recall and replace the power supplies on a select group of machines within a certain range of serial numbers but stopped at that. MY machine was just after the run of numbers so, I pay. There appears to be no thought on Apple's part as to the possibility that this same power supply problem might extend slightly beyond the range of serial numbers deemed to be the problem group. So, after nearly 20 years, I am starting to see the quality of Apple computers start to deteriorate and, for all the laid back, easy going slacker attitude projected in the ads, Apple is apparently going the way of other corporations with more hype than backing. Oh well, it was destined to come. But it is, none the less, disappointing and I felt I needed to vent.
    Dave

    I suggest you call Apple Customer Relations at 800-767-2775 and see if there's anything they can do for you.
    I also suggest that you contact [Apple.com/feedback] and tell them what you think.
    However, this forum is for technical questions, and understandable though it may be, not a place for venting.

  • My experience installing CF7 (From a long-time CF admin and user)

    I am a long-time administrator of Coldfusion and a serious
    designer. I've used Coldfusion since version 2 and am the person
    who brought CF into our architecture as a keystone technology.
    In all of that time, I've *never* had the problems I've had
    with installing version 7 to a number of servers in my research
    laboratory. I'm a paying client who has serious investment in
    Coldfusion through quite a serious chunk of my enterprise. I'm the
    corporate webmaster for my company, and to be honest, I'm less than
    pleased with this inferior release and seeming inability of
    Abobe/Macromedia to insure quality control on ALL apsects of their
    operation.
    I have just spent the last 3 days in a knock-down drag out
    battle with my simple Windows XP dev laptop to install the product
    for a project I'd like to work on. Similarly, a number of my
    laboratory systems have had equally interesting issues with their
    installation process and once again, equally unacceptable results
    until I arm-wrestled these systems into place.
    So... For the benefit of those who have been around the block
    like myself, I offer some of my experience:
    1. Use install disks rather than the horrid download that
    flat DOES NOT WORK from Macromedia for "tryout" of product... What
    a waste of time and effort. The effect of this has been to turn off
    many prospective customers and fans of the product. Who is driving
    the boat on this disasterous course and quality control issue? Is
    this some kind of "drive the customer" away ploy for some new
    product or platform to be offered?
    2. Followed instructions at
    http://www.macromedia.com/cfusion/knowledgebase/index.cfm?id=tn_19575
    - This finally worked IF you pay detailed attention to every last
    detail. You can "borrow" jrun.dll from another successful install
    of CF 7 if you can get your hands on the DLL or go spend more time
    learning how to extract the file as noted in some of the
    literature, which, to a paying customer, should be documented in
    detail with the article... Quit sending people on wild-goose
    chases.
    3. Once install occured for me on laptop, I had problems with
    the login for cfide/admin - The migration wizard would not let me
    go further. It always returned me back to login prompt. I looked
    into the matter further and decided to "borrow" the neo-query.xml
    file from a seasoned system and use it on my laptop to kick-start
    the final part of my install. This worked and I now can control my
    server.
    Summary: I've fought version 7 from day one. My advice is to
    abandon downloads from Macromedia on the product and go with
    requesting install disks that actually do give you a shot at making
    the product work. Secondly, realize that there may be other issues
    with the install once you do get the product to communicate with
    your server and be willing to research the issues, since, once you
    find the answers, the product actually works pretty nicely.
    Thirdly, Write letters like I am doing now to tell Macromedia/Abobe
    how you feel about this inferior and totally unacceptable
    installation procedure and to improve the quality of their download
    trials.
    Personally, I think there should be a kit made available with
    a full copy of the CFusionMX7 directory set up as a virgin and
    workable install to fix the rash of issues out there. If not
    available from Macromedia, then I'd suggest that it be made
    available on user Coldfusion forums and sites to ease the pain and
    let the bloody system work for those who just want to build cool
    things with what has always been the superior web development
    toolset.
    I love Coldfusion, but if this is the future, I certainly
    know my options with Blue Dragon and other platforms... I'd hate to
    lose my confidence in Adobe/Macromedia, but this latest set of
    issues has me wondering exactly what is going on over at the
    Coldfusion labs...
    I hope my experience and advice help others who may be going
    through the same challenges I have faced...
    Jon

    Jon,
    As another long time CF Admin/Dev I second everything you've
    said here..
    I've been using the CFMX/JRun mix for years now and love it;
    but I'm always finding myself spending way too much valuable time
    looking through these boards for solutions.
    I particularly like the idea of setting up a 'kit' with a
    full dir structure, etc. - That would be a great idea for newer
    users.. I'd also like to see better commenting or readmes that
    fully explain the configuration options for all files - such as all
    of the xml files under the WEB-INF dir..
    There have been a few too many times that I've looked in the
    documentation only to have it tell me to get a book for 'advanced
    config options' - and I wouldn't consider any of what I'm looking
    to do to be 'advanced'.. thank god for Ben Forta!
    -mw

  • Apple Maps - Please reconsider and include Google Maps. As a long time Apple customer, I am disappointed iOS would regress the system and inconvenience millions because of a vendetta that should never hinder users. Not only does the transit feature I used

    Apple Maps - Please reconsider and include Google Maps. As a long time Apple customer, I am disappointed iOS would regress the system and inconvenience millions because of a vendetta that should never hinder users. Not only does the transit feature I used religiously no longer exist, but clicking on an address in a website now directs users to a poor Google Maps interface. I am surprised to see such a effortless update from a company squatting on the resources to make a change its customers are asking for.

    varjak paw wrote:
    Apple has documented an API to provide add-ons to the Maps app in the iOS 6 SDK, so that such add-ons are possible is absolutely not a guess that the capability is there. As to whether someone will indeed develop an add-on for any given transit system, that would be a guess, yes, but at a couple of companies at least have already announced plans to do so.
    In select cities and areas - so now I'm going from being able to supply this information myself to either wait for someone to supply an app or write an app myself... This is not feature progression but feature regression. Adding transit times or a specific overlay should not have to be something you need to do through code via an API. So no dice... Your guess that we will see better transit information is just that - a guess, nothing else.
    If you don't agree with that editorial, you are certainly free to do so. I provided the link as food for thought for those who have been questioning Apples' decision to drop Google's maps from iOS. Whether or not you agree with Brad's analysis or that of anyone else is up to you.
    But on that central issue the editorial fails - it's is not the true tale of why Apple made their move and therefore useless even as "food for thought" (because it's guesswork).

  • Im a long time Android user switching to the iphone 6 plus. What is the experience of the first time iphone users switching from Android

    I had the Gal note 3 then was given a SGS5 for a replace because the Note3 had issues.
    Couldnt stand the screen size so I had to go back to the larger screen.
    I decided to go with the iphone 6 plus.
    So for those who have made the switch from android to apple for the first time what
    has you experience been like.
    I am an ipad user but want to know peoples opinions that have switched phones.
    One thing I dislike and I know you can change it; it seems like google want to
    force you to use chrome which I cannot stand

        Hi zharvey85,
    I truly apologize for your experience at the store. However, we provided the pre order as a way to avoid needing to go to store as inventory availability are subject to change without notice. The pre order secures the device and the other email was for the shipping information. Perhaps you can re order the device online to get the ball rolling for you to get your iPhone 6 plus as desired as opposed to going to the store of which inventory can change depending on the availability.
    Thank you!
    EdW_VZW Follow us on twitter @VZWSupport

  • EXS24 Saving takes a LONG time. Bad EXS flaw?

    Hi all.
    My EXS takes forever to save a new patch. I've had this problem for years and just dealt with it. But now, I'm sick of it.
    The reason it takes so long is because of the way the EXS insists on rebuilding/rescanning your entire EXS library every time you add something new to it. It's completely unnecessary. And it makes things a nightmare for those of us who run LARGE exs24 libraries.
    I've read of other people with the same problem (I've still never come across a solution!) yet still this problem exists. I can only assume that Apple seem to think that's is perfectly fine for those of us who run large EXS libraries to WAIT for anywhere up to or above 5 MINUTES just to save a new patch to their libraries.
    The way it is set up (rescanning the library every time you add something new) clearly doesn't take into account those of us who run large libraries.
    It has also made the wonderful new "Convert to New Instrument" virtually unusable to me, as every time I use it, the EXS then rescans the entire EXS library because I've added something new to it, so I literally sit there for ~5 minutes. God help me if I want to use that feature a few times while I'm working on something!
    PLEASE FIX THIS APPLE!
    Now my question:
    Is there ANYBODY out there running a LARGE EXS LIBRARY (mine is about 350gb) who DOESN'T have this problem saving new patches?
    If so, how do you get around this?
    I've been on Logic for years (back to vers 4 or 5, I can't remember which) and this has ALWAYS been a terrible problem for as long as I've used the EXS as I've always run a large sample library. I'm pretty-much convinced that there is no solution to this and that it is just a terrible EXS flaw that Apple NEED TO FIX, but I guess I've got to ask before I give up entirely.
    It shouldn't take 5 minutes to save an EXS patch on an 8-core Mac Pro. And again, it's not the saving of the patch that is the cause of the problem - it's the fact that the EXS rescans your library every time you add something new to it that CREATES this problem.
    The main thing I was quietly hoping for before I installed the latest Snow Leopard and latest Logic 9 last week was "Maybe Apple have finally fixed the EXS saving issue!? I'll cross my fingers..!"
    .... but no, it's still there. Still the same all these years later.
    Anybody have any ideas on how to "minimize the damage" before Apple finally get off their bums and FIX this, and make the EXS more user-friendly for those of us who run large EXS libraries?
    Thanks all.

    Surely, it's best for organization to have everything TOGETHER?
    No, it's best to keep the sampler instruments and samples separate, in the main. If you look at Logic's content, and the jam Pack instruments, they all follow this scheme as well.
    By keeping the samples in your sampler instruments directory, you are adding tens of thousands of files to be searched through - no wonder it takes a long time - probably takes ages to load Logic as well.
    In addition to the workaround mentioned previously - if you don't save your sampler instruments to the sampler instrument directory, but instead to some other place (eg, the desktop), does Logic rescan the menus? If not, then I'd suggest always saving away from the main sampler instruments directory, and then copy them back there afterwards.
    That would take me years to re-organize, not to mention that it starts making things very messy.... having parts of my libraries HERE, and parts of my libraries THERE.... saving new instruments..... backing up libraries.... installing new libraries.... etc...
    Not really. IN fact, keeping the samples next to the sampler instruments is in some ways a bad solution - what if you create different sampler instruments based on those samples - do you duplicate a second copy of those samples to keep with those sampler instruments, or do you keep the sampler instruments accessing the samples elsewhere?
    BTW Redmatica's ProManager or EXSManager can reorganise your sample library for you in this or other ways checking duplicates, relinking your sampler instruments, and letting you control where you put the samples and how you wish to organise them. Worth thinking about.
    My Sample Library is about 290gigs. I keep the sampler instruments and samples separate, and have no organisational problems. And I have no problems with long EXS menu reloads either.

  • Best Buy Smash Preorder Bad Experience

    I sent the following email to Best Buy regarding my bad experience when I went to pickup my Super Smash preorder. After hours of being on hold and being transferred to countless different people, the final explanation I was given is that Best Buy can at any time cancel a pre-order, so I had no recourse. Here is the original email I sent:
    "I was writing to make bestbuy aware of a very unfortunate situation that I encountered tonight at my local best buy (Las Vegas, NV, Summerlin location). I preordered the $99.99 bundle of Smash Brothers Wii U in store, putting $5 down to reserve a copy. I have my best friend in town tonight to play Smash this weekend, so I was really excited to get off work and go grab my copy. Unfortunately, once I got to best buy, they told me that they sold my copy to someone else accidentally and that they didn't know if they would ever get another shipment. They offered me no recourse except to wait and see if another shipment came in. After driving around for a couple hours I finally found a place that still had a bundle and purchased it. It was a horrible experience and makes me regret becoming part of Best Buys gamer club. I would have gotten 20% off at Best Buy with my Gamers Club Unlocked Membership, but I had to get it at Fry's instead and paid full price. I tried to find it at another Best Buy but all of the ones in Vegas were sold out. 
    I would appreciate if Best Buy would, at a minimum, refund 1.) the $5 preorder I put down on the game and; 2.) the $20 discount that I missed out on with my Gamers Club membership because I had to go purchase it at Fry's. I have usually had good experiences with best buy, but this one has really soured me on buying my games at Best Buy and would hope that you guys would make sure something like this doesn't happen in the future. Preordering games is to ensure that you get a copy when it comes out, it is not a source for free money for Best Buy. I can provide any documentation you need and I look forward to hearing from you."
    After talking to many different associates for countless hours I am done trying to get anything for this nonsense. The last person I talked to told me to put down the full money instead of $5 next time and this might not happen. Best Buy has lost a loyal customer because of their policy.

    Hi Vote4link,
    As a Super Smash Bros fan myself, it’s truly disheartening to read of your pre-order experience. Having a friend in town to play over the weekend, only to find out that your copy isn’t available at our store, is understandably frustrating and I’m very sorry if that is what happened here. While it sounds like you found another option to acquire the game, I regret hearing that it wasn’t at Best Buy!
    Like zztoluca said, if you pre-ordered and your copy arrived at the store, it should have been held for you. If this didn’t occur, it was a store error and this is the last thing we want for our gamers, especially those who are members of Gamers Club Unlocked. With that, your $5 deposit will automatically be refunded to you if you don’t fulfill your pre-order within eight days if it was created on BestBuy.com, five days if created in-store.
    I’d like to ensure your feedback is seen by leadership at the store, so if willing, please send me a private message and include either your BestBuy.com order number, or the Customer Service PIN located on the bottom of your in-store pre-order receipt. You can send me a private message by clicking the link in my signature.
    Thanks for sharing your concerns with us and despite the circumstances, I hope you’ve been enjoying Super Smash Bros.
    Brian|Senior Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
     Private Message

  • Bad experience with Verizon Fios Internet and Customer Service

    I had an extremely bad experience with Verizon Fios Internet service and I will never use Verizon again. 
    In August 2014, I called and installed the Verizon Fios Internet and phone bundle. I asked the customer agent several times if I will be charged anything before the installation of the Internet and phone service. She said, 'No, we will only start charging after the Internet and phone are installed at your apartment'. I went to the store and picked up the router and phone and installed it at home by myself. The router did not work. I called Tech support and they said it will take several days for another available agent to come and look into the issue. I decided to discontinue the service and closed the account that same night.
    At the end of the month, I received a bill of $80 of activation fee for the internet service. Nothing was ever activated, my internet router did not work, and I got charged an activation fee for a service that I did not even start using. From August to December, I called customer service over 10 times and some of them said they will waive it while the others said it's a non-refundable activation fee. One lady said, 'Ma'am, the activation fee starts when you placed the order, the warehouse received it and packed the router in the boxes....' Isn't that ridiculous? If that's the case, please ask all your customer representative to say a clause before new customers open their account: Are you aware that you will be charged a non-refundable activation fee once you open the account regardless of whether or not you use the service or not. 
    So after 3 months (November 2014), I decided to get out of all these troubles and paid off my $80 activation fee. They put the bill in the collection agency and I called them and paid the overdue balance. Then in December 2014, I received a statement saying I have a $3.11 overdue balance. The collection agency told me that they will charge me for the whole activation fee and a $3 transaction fee for the transaction. So now Verizon came back and said I owed them the $3 because I paid the collection agency their transaction fee. 
    I am very disappointed and furious about the whole Verizon operating system. Charging a customer for an activation fee for a service s/he has not consumed or used does not make any business sense. In addition, they do not know how to coordinate with the collection agency on overdue bills. Give the customer a heads-up that they will be charged a transaction fee on top of the overdue balance, and that transaction fee does not count towards clearing the balance. 
    I have completely lost my confidence in Verizon albeit the many good feedback from my friends. 

    Hi crystallau52,
    Sorry you are having difficulty. An agent with access to your account will reach out to you directly by email, private message in the Forums and/or the billing telephone number on your Verizon account for more information or to help you resolve your issue.

  • Long Time Customer Very Unhappy With Latest Service

    First off, I've purchased at least $15k-$20K worth of my electronics at Best Buy over the last 10 years...5 flat screens, a Bose sound system, washer and dryer, a Samsung refrigerator....all without problems...until my most recent purchase. I can honestly say it has been the worst experience I've had in retail ever.
    I purchased a Frigidaire FGHS2655PF5A on Feburary 13th, and it arrived quickly on the 16th. It didn't take long for the frost to build up and the internal fan to grind so loudly that it overpowered the tv sound in the next room so I called customer service on March 8th (the problems started earlier but I had other issues going on that took my time). Little did I know that Best Buy's return policy is 2 weeks. That seems really short for a $1,300.00 purchase. So I'm 6 days past a very short window to begin with and they offer to send out someone from Geek Squad to take a look at it. Personally, it sounded bad enough they should have just taken it back but I was given the "no exceptions" line several times, so I accedped the Geek Squad help. 
    The gentlman that came out was incredibly nice and professional, but he couldn't fix the problem. Apparently the first person I spoke with on the phone wasn't listening to the problem and sent a completely unrelated part, so the repair man ordered the right one and came back the next week to install it. Unfortunately it didn't work, and I still have crazy grinding and frost.
    I called the repairman and he in turn called back at the office to have someone call me to schedule a new appointment. I had a voicemail from someone who said to call back to Geek Squad, and that he had an open ticket for me to schedule more help.
    I called in tonight (April 14th)at 7:50 PM PST and got an incredibly unhelpful individual who said "Oh I see the ticket but I can't fulfill it. We were never supposed to even help you the first time" I responded "Well you kind of didn't, hence the reason I'm calling back, but are you telling me you won't send someone out to fix this broken refrigerator?" He said he would check with his manager and put me on hold. Five minutes later he said his manager denied the request. I asked to speak with the manager and he told me "It will be a long time, she's busy and I think she just left the floor" I asked him for his ID number or last name for reference and he said "I can't give you that information" Then I asked him for his supervisor's name "I can't tell you that either". I told him I'd wait for her to be available. 10 minutes later he came back and said "She's still busy, do you want to wait?" I said "Absolutely". 10 minutes later, he came back and said "I've been instructed to schedule someone to come out but I'm not doing it under my name so I don't get in trouble. My manager said that she was going to take too long and didn't want you to wait so I could submit the order"
    So here's the situation I'm in. Long time customer, horrible experience that hasn't been indicative of all of my experiences, but this one was terrible.  In the past I've had nothing but great things to say about Best Buy, but given the incredible frequency of how obnoxiously loud my refrigerator is, I have a story that I will tell everybody that comes into my house and asks "what the heck is that noise?".

    Hello Jmcc084,
    Welcome to the forum. In our household of 5 (sometimes 6 when my son is home from college), I could not see myself being without a fully functioning refrigerator. Also, the grinding noise sounds dreadful. I can completely understand your frustration, and I'm very sorry to hear how many troubles you've encountered to get it repaired.  
    Using the e-mail you registered on the forum, I was able to locate the service orders for your refrigerator, and I will be reaching out to the appropriate team to gather more information. I will be following up with you as soon as I have more details. In the meantime please do not hesitate to let me know if you have any further questions or concerns. 
    Sincerely, 
    Maria|Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
     Private Message

  • Saving takes a very long time!!!  -- PLEASE HELP

    I just bought KN 09 and very happy with it. But I have a presentation prepared in 08 that has several large Quicktime files in them. Every time I make little changes in 09, it takes a LONG time to save it -- like 6 minutes. What's the problem?
    I saved the file as KN 09 right away and noticed that the size of the presentation went from 1.5Gb in '08 to 2.8Gb in '09. I'm running it on a Macbook 2.4 dual core2 duo still on Leopard 10.5.8. Getting 10.6 tomorrow.
    I'm very disappointed as I thought KN09 would be a wonderful improvement. It's a major step backward in my experience. Please show what I'm doing wrong.

    Thanks for your helpfuly reply, Charlie. I definitely think this is what I need, but I have more questions now. First to answer yours ( sorry it's so long -- the last question about video size is the critical one in my situation)
    Charlie Fellowes wrote:
    Question(s): How long is your presentation and how many slides to consume 2.8GB? That's awfully large.
    Our presentation is 96 slides long (76 are images averaging probably 1.5Mb to 2Mb files)
    I've just checked the Keynote file and it weighs in at 53.8MB for a 1024 x 768px presentation.+
    I'm running my presentation in 800 x 600.
    Did you downsample the images for optimum viewing?
    I don't know how to do this although the images don't seem to be the problem. When I remove my large video slides, it saves much more quickly. Any general thoughts on trimming images down or what size is good....
    Are the Quicktime movies optimised for viewing within a presentation?
    Probably not. I edited them in iMovie HD and exported them in full quality quicktime format. The first video is over 1Gb and the second is 403 Mb. What should I have done differently? How do you optimize videos for viewing in iMovie HD?

  • Have a very bad experience at MCC SIAM DISCOVERY in Bangkok , Thailand

    About six months ago my iPad have some problem about Wi-Fi, a very bad signal and hard to connect. I already buy an AppleCare Protection Plan for iPad online, so it was still have warranty. I went to MCC SIAM DISCOVERY (http://www.maccenter.co.th/mcc/Home.html) have a very long queue with a very boring face of customer service guy. When it was my turn they check my iPad about 5 sec and said that my iPad are out of warranty because it has too much scratch. They also said that if I want to buy AppleCare Protection Plan, I must buy it there. So my problem was unfix, it's ok because my iPad work with Wi-Fi sometime. Until yesterday 2 NOV 2013, my iPad have another problem it was hold in headphone mode all the time. I went to that place again (MCC SIAM DISCOVERY) so I found this “Due to computer's queue overload, our computer service will resume again on Nov 18th, 2013. Please visit others nearby other service providers. “(http://upic.me/show/47961640, http://upic.me/show/47961641). It was a very bad experience about this apple service center, please check your authorized service provider quality, especially this MCC SIAM DISCOVERY (http://www.maccenter.co.th/mcc/Home.html). Apple have a very successful sale in Thailand but you don't have enough after service? Today my iPad is fully broken its show only apple logo when it's open and will show logo until battery out. Thanks for a very bad experience (twice) MCC SIAM DISCOVERY.
    Ps. this is my iPad Serial Number: DL*******KNW
    I use apple product almost everything I use iPhone, have an iPad, Mac book Pro. From now on I must think carefully about using apple product in Thailand.
    <Edited By Host>

    Hi Abbie. You have every reason to be upset. These issues normally happen in our country. You can send them an email regarding your concern here:
    http://www.apple.com/feedback/macbook.html
    Regarding your battery, you can probably reset the SMC and see if that improves your battery life. Here are the steps.
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ht3964

  • Slave instance can not synchronized with the master for a long time

    Hi,
    Slave instance can not synchronized with the master for a long time, and the gap of LSNs between slave and master are more and more larger. The transfer bytes per second between master and slave is 118MB/s , upper limit to the ethernet card. Why???
    ENVIRONMENT:
    1. A network program which we called mcdb is based on BDB 4.8.30. It is used to accept get/set requests and then query data from bdb or save data to bdb.
    2. mcdb implements replication with bdb replication manager api. The default start replication policy is DB_REP_ELECTION, rep ack policy is DB_REPMGR_ACKS_ONE_PEER and rep priority is 100.
    3. The bdb data files, bdb log files, region files and rep files are all in the same home directory.
    4. There are two instances of the mcdb are separately on two standalone servers which has no other programs. These two instances are in one replication group which can elect a master automatically.
    5. The master instance is online, which has lots of requests (get, set, delete).
    ACTIONS:
    1. Start two mcdb instances on two servers and the two instance make a replication group. Slave has already synchronized with the master.
    2. Stop the slave for a long time (more than 20 hours).
    3. Start the slave instance to synchronize data with master.
    RESULT:
    1. the gap of LSNs between slave and master are more and more larger.
    2. db_stat of master and slave:
    master db_stat:
    467170     Number of PERM messages not acknowledged
    9245     Number of messages queued due to network delay
    172415     Number of messages discarded due to queue length
    25880     Number of existing connections dropped
    3407     Number of failed new connection attempts
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    DB_REPMGR site information:
    10.67.15.146 (eid: 0, port: 30011)
    Environment configured as a replication master
    331726/3574994     Next LSN to be used
    0/0     Not waiting for any missed log records
    328872/466092     Maximum permanent LSN
    0     Next page number expected
    0     Not waiting for any missed pages
    0     Number of duplicate master conditions originally detected at this site
    2147M     Current environment ID (2147483647)
    100     Current environment priority
    49     Current generation number
    50     Election generation number for the current or next election
    2323     Number of duplicate log records received
    0     Number of log records currently queued
    6768     Maximum number of log records ever queued at once
    55284     Total number of log records queued
    120M     Number of log records received and appended to the log (120475988)
    111     Number of log records missed and requested
    2147M     Current master ID (2147483647)
    2     Number of times the master has changed
    0     Number of messages received with a bad generation number
    8505306     Number of messages received and processed
    12     Number of messages ignored due to pending recovery
    471869     Number of failed message sends
    12M     Number of messages sent (12959945)
    0     Number of new site messages received
    1     Number of environments believed to be in the replication group
    990543     Transmission limited
    0     Number of outdated conditions detected
    0     Number of duplicate page records received
    0     Number of page records received and added to databases
    0     Number of page records missed and requested
    Startup complete
    6244678     Number of transactions applied
    0     Number of startsync messages delayed
    1     Number of elections held
    1     Number of elections won
    No election in progress
    0.057097     Duration of last election (seconds)
    8944103     Number of bulk buffer sends triggered by full buffer
    0     Number of single records exceeding bulk buffer size
    5273M     Number of records added to a bulk buffer (5273592170)
    10M     Number of bulk buffers sent (10490865)
    0     Number of re-request messages received
    0     Number of request messages this client failed to process
    0     Number of request messages received by this client
    slave db_stat:
    0     Number of PERM messages not acknowledged
    0     Number of messages queued due to network delay
    0     Number of messages discarded due to queue length
    1454     Number of existing connections dropped
    0     Number of failed new connection attempts
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    DB_REPMGR site information:
    10.67.15.147 (eid: 0, port: 30011)
    Environment configured as a replication client
    329544/2916048     Next LSN expected
    330433/2013808     LSN of first log record we have after missed log records
    329543/5500501     Maximum permanent LSN
    0     Next page number expected
    0     Not waiting for any missed pages
    0     Number of duplicate master conditions originally detected at this site
    2147M     Current environment ID (2147483647)
    100     Current environment priority
    49     Current generation number
    50     Election generation number for the current or next election
    5256M     Number of duplicate log records received (5256599432)
    3925284     Number of log records currently queued
    3925285     Maximum number of log records ever queued at once
    4880561     Total number of log records queued
    3578038     Number of log records received and appended to the log
    1912297     Number of log records missed and requested
    0     Current master ID
    1     Number of times the master has changed
    0     Number of messages received with a bad generation number
    12M     Number of messages received and processed (12980442)
    2     Number of messages ignored due to pending recovery
    0     Number of failed message sends
    1912307     Number of messages sent
    0     Number of new site messages received
    0     Number of environments believed to be in the replication group
    0     Transmission limited
    0     Number of outdated conditions detected
    0     Number of duplicate page records received
    0     Number of page records received and added to databases
    0     Number of page records missed and requested
    Startup incomplete
    110568     Number of transactions applied
    80     Number of startsync messages delayed
    0     Number of elections held
    0     Number of elections won
    No election in progress
    0     Number of bulk buffer sends triggered by full buffer
    0     Number of single records exceeding bulk buffer size
    0     Number of records added to a bulk buffer
    0     Number of bulk buffers sent
    0     Number of re-request messages received
    0     Number of request messages this client failed to process
    0     Number of request messages received by this client
    Edited by: 899585 on 2013-1-4 下午10:54
    Edited by: 899585 on 2013-1-4 下午10:55

    Hi,
    Unfortunately, this issue is beyond the level of what is supported over the forum. Performance related issues are extremely complex and require an in-depth understanding of your environment and dedicated support. In a generic sense, you can look at this as a basic queueing problem. You have a server that went down and work is still coming in. When the server gets started it is possible that it may never catch up depending on new work coming in and the rate at processing the old work.
    So what would you do in this case --- one thing would be to reduce the new work coming in. In HA terms this would be slowing the master down and you can increase DB_REP_ACK_TIMEOUT for this. Another thing you could do is add fresh servers to help reduce the workload. In HA terms, this would be the equivalent of restarting the client and give it a fresh look at everything. Another thing you could do is replan the system and load balance. In HA terms, it would mean something like take a hot backup of the master and reinit a client from scratch.
    If you are interested in getting a dedicated support person working on this concern, please let me know and we can move forward down that path. Just respond to the thread with your email address and I will get in contact with you so we can pursue that approach.
    thanks
    mike

  • NW2004s takes a long time to start up

    I am trying to find out why out NW2004s takes a long time to start up.
    We have installed NW2004s SP8 JAVA only to use it as Enterprise Portal with Oracle 10g on SUN SPARC 64. While the shutdown of J2EE is pretty fast, the startup take over an hour and half.
    /usr/sap/<SID>/JC##/work/dev_server0 file shows:
    Thu Aug 10 15:31:48 2006
    4017.515: [GC 4017.515: [ParNew: 104368K->17613K(131328K), 0.0423530
    secs] 797893K->711138K(1004800K), 0.0428819 secs]
    Thu Aug 10 15:31:50 2006
    4019.309: [GC 4019.310: [ParNew: 105165K->17610K(131328K), 0.0762693
    secs] 798690K->711134K(1004800K), 0.0767036 secs]
    Thu Aug 10 15:34:35 2006
    4184.118: [GC 4184.119: [ParNew: 105162K->22685K(131328K), 0.0762199
    secs] 798686K->716210K(1004800K), 0.0766811 secs]
    and /usr/sap/<SID>/JC##/work/std_server0.out file show entries like:
    2051.407: [GC 2051.408: [ParNew: 112475K->25810K(131328K), 0.1614717
    secs] 678386K->591721K(1004800K), 0.1619460 secs]
    2060.554: [GC 2060.555: [ParNew: 113362K->26687K(131328K), 0.1458862
    secs] 679273K->592599K(1004800K), 0.1463431 secs]
    2068.742: [GC 2068.742: [ParNew: 114239K->27592K(131328K), 0.1464110
    secs] 680151K->593504K(1004800K), 0.1470097 secs]
    2077.575: [GC 2077.576: [ParNew: 115144K->28470K(131328K), 0.1545706
    secs] 681056K->594382K(1004800K), 0.1550365 secs]
    2086.411: [GC 2086.411: [ParNew: 116022K->29505K(131328K), 0.1559618
    secs] 681934K->595417K(1004800K), 0.1564804 secs]
    2094.803: [GC 2094.803: [ParNew: 117057K->30419K(131328K), 0.1531343
    secs] 682969K->596331K(1004800K), 0.1536090 secs]
    2103.255: [GC 2103.255: [ParNew: 117971K->31345K(131328K), 0.1602581
    secs] 683883K->597257K(1004800K), 0.1620506 secs]
    2112.423: [GC 2112.424: [ParNew: 118897K->32236K(131328K), 0.1715456
    secs] 684809K->598147K(1004800K), 0.1721748 secs]
    2123.276: [GC 2123.276: [ParNew: 119788K->33014K(131328K), 0.1640996
    secs] 685699K->598926K(1004800K), 0.1645846 secs]
    2132.172: [GC 2132.172: [ParNew: 120566K->33980K(131328K), 0.1673372
    secs] 686478K->599891K(1004800K), 0.1678214 secs]
    2141.072: [GC 2141.072: [ParNew: 121532K->34784K(131328K), 0.1810283
    secs] 687443K->600695K(1004800K), 0.1814991 secs]
    2149.693: [GC 2149.694: [ParNew: 122336K->35368K(131328K), 0.1670516
    secs] 688247K->601280K(1004800K), 0.1675269 secs]
    2158.486: [GC 2158.486: [ParNew: 122920K->36435K(131328K), 0.1756513
    secs] 688832K->602347K(1004800K), 0.1761320 secs]
    2167.314: [GC 2167.315: [ParNew: 123987K->37497K(131328K), 0.1852015
    secs] 689899K->603409K(1004800K), 0.1857250 secs]
    2176.397: [GC 2176.398: [ParNew: 125049K->38251K(131328K), 0.1741406
    secs] 690961K->604163K(1004800K), 0.1746117 secs]
    2185.352: [GC 2185.352: [ParNew: 125803K->39375K(131328K), 0.1920462
    secs] 691715K->605287K(1004800K), 0.1925810 secs]
    2194.150: [GC 2194.151: [ParNew: 126927K->40253K(131328K), 0.1923566
    secs] 692839K->606165K(1004800K), 0.1928781 secs]
    2202.884: [GC 2202.884: [ParNew: 127805K->38024K(131328K), 0.2031970
    secs] 693717K->607088K(1004800K), 0.2036677 secs]
    2211.384: [GC 2211.385: [ParNew: 125576K->38851K(131328K), 0.1844842
    secs] 694640K->607915K(1004800K), 0.1849062 secs]
    2219.963: [GC 2219.964: [ParNew: 126403K->39869K(131328K), 0.1842210
    secs] 695467K->608932K(1004800K), 0.1846878 secs]
    2228.866: [GC 2228.867: [ParNew: 127421K->39719K(131328K), 0.1920358
    secs] 696484K->609702K(1004800K), 0.1925630 secs]
    2238.453: [GC 2238.453: [ParNew: 127271K->40643K(131328K), 0.1889567
    secs] 697254K->610627K(1004800K), 0.1894261 secs]
    2247.056: [GC 2247.056: [ParNew: 128195K->40718K(131328K), 0.1947238
    secs] 698179K->611585K(1004800K), 0.1951833 secs]
    2255.409: [GC 2255.410: [ParNew: 128270K->40804K(131328K), 0.1939193
    secs] 699137K->612886K(1004800K), 0.1943765 secs]
    2264.305: [GC 2264.306: [ParNew: 128356K->39943K(131328K), 0.1884611
    secs] 700438K->613753K(1004800K), 0.1889279 secs]
    2273.187: [GC 2273.188: [ParNew: 127495K->39907K(131328K), 0.1996605
    secs] 701305K->614598K(1004800K), 0.2001354 secs]
    2281.869: [GC 2281.870: [ParNew: 127459K->39951K(131328K), 0.1870669
    secs] 702150K->615514K(1004800K), 0.1875029 secs]
    2290.306: [GC 2290.307: [ParNew: 127503K->39975K(131328K), 0.1803927
    secs] 703066K->616409K(1004800K), 0.1809368 secs]
    2300.101: [GC 2300.101: [ParNew: 127527K->39897K(131328K), 0.1830319
    secs] 703961K->617187K(1004800K), 0.1835056 secs]
    2310.130: [GC 2310.130: [ParNew: 127449K->39869K(131328K), 0.1858475
    secs] 704739K->618039K(1004800K), 0.1862819 secs]
    Does anyone know what these entries are and some possible options to speed up the startup process? Thanks. I have already gone through the notes for Virtual memory and  heap settings for SUN systems. Has anyone had any similar experience?
    Thanks!

    What SP are you on?  We had a similar issue w/SP6 but it was resoloved with SP7.
    Michael

  • Simple query is taking long time

    Hi Experts,
    The below query is taking long time.
    [code]SELECT   FS.*
      FROM   ORL.FAX_STAGE FS
             INNER JOIN
                   ORL.FAX_SOURCE FSRC
                INNER JOIN
                   GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING GBM
                ON GBM.BU_ID = FSRC.BUID
             ON UPPER (FSRC.FAX_NUMBER) = UPPER (FS.DESTINATION)
    WHERE       FSRC.IS_DELETED = 'N'
             AND GBM.BU_ID IS NOT NULL
             AND UPPER (FS.FAX_STATUS) ='COMPLETED';[/code]
    this query is returning 1645457 records.
    [code]PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    | Id  | Operation           | Name                   | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)|
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT    |                        |   625K|   341M| 45113   (1)|
    |   1 |  HASH JOIN          |                        |   625K|   341M| 45113   (1)|
    |   2 |   NESTED LOOPS      |                        |   611 | 14664 |    22   (0)|
    |   3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL| FAX_SOURCE             |  2290 | 48090 |    22   (0)|
    |   4 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN | GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING_BUID |     1 |     3 |     0   (0)|
    |   5 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL | FAX_STAGE              |  2324K|  1214M| 45076   (1)|
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Note
       - 'PLAN_TABLE' is old version
    15 rows selected.[/code]
    The distinct number of records in each table.
    [code]SELECT FAX_STATUS,count(*)
    FROM fax_STAGE
    GROUP BY FAX_STATUS;
    FAX_STATUS    COUNT(*)
    BROKEN          10
    Broken - New    9
    Completed    2324493
    New             20
    SELECT is_deleted,COUNT(*)
    FROM  FAX_SOURCE
    GROUP BY IS_DELETED;
    IS_DELETED COUNT(*)
    N         2290
    Y         78[/code]
    Total number of records in each table.
    [code]SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ORL.FAX_SOURCE FSRC-- 2368
    SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ORL.FAX_STAGE--2324532
    SELECT COUNT(*) FROM APPS_GLOBAL.GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING--9
    [/code]
    To improve the performance of this query I have created the following indexes.
    [code]Functional based index on UPPER (FSRC.FAX_NUMBER) ,UPPER (FS.DESTINATION) and UPPER (FS.FAX_STATUS).
    Bitmap index on FSRC.IS_DELETED.
    Normal Index on GBM.BU_ID and FSRC.BUID.
    [/code]
    But still the performance is bad for this query.
    What can I do apart from this to improve the performance of this query.
    Please help me .
    Thanks in advance.

    <I have created the following indexes.
    CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_DESTINATION_RAM ON ORL.FAX_STAGE(UPPER("DESTINATION"))
    CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_FAX_STATUS_RAM ON ORL.FAX_STAGE(LOWER("FAX_STATUS"))
    CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_UPPER_FAX_STATUS_RAM ON ORL.FAX_STAGE(UPPER("FAX_STATUS"))
    CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_BUID_RAM ON ORL.FAX_SOURCE(BUID)
    CREATE INDEX ORL.IDX_FAX_NUMBER_RAM ON ORL.FAX_SOURCE(UPPER("FAX_NUMBER"))
    CREATE BITMAP INDEX ORL.IDX_IS_DELETED_RAM ON ORL.FAX_SOURCE(IS_DELETED)
    After creating the following indexes performance got improved.
    But our DBA said that new BITMAP index at FAX_SOURCE table (ORL.IDX_IS_DELETED_RAM) can cause locks
    on multiple rows if IS_DELETED column is in use. Please proceed with detailed tests.
    I am sending the explain plan before creating indexes and after indexes has been created.
    SELECT  FS.*
    FROM  ORL.FAX_STAGE FS
                    INNER JOIN
                    ORL.FAX_SOURCE FSRC
                  INNER JOIN
                      GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING GBM
                    ON GBM.BU_ID = FSRC.BUID
                ON UPPER (FSRC.FAX_NUMBER) = UPPER (FS.DESTINATION)
    WHERE      FSRC.IS_DELETED = 'N'
              AND GBM.BU_ID IS NOT NULL
              AND UPPER (FS.FAX_STATUS) =:B1;
    --OLD without indexes
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 3076973749
    | Id  | Operation          | Name                  | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time    |
    |  0 | SELECT STATEMENT    |                        |  141K|    85M| 45130  (1)| 00:09:02 |
    |*  1 |  HASH JOIN          |                        |  141K|    85M| 45130  (1)| 00:09:02 |
    |  2 |  NESTED LOOPS      |                        |  611 | 18330 |    22  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL| FAX_SOURCE            |  2290 | 59540 |    22  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  4 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN | GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING_BUID |    1 |    4 |    0  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  5 |  TABLE ACCESS FULL | FAX_STAGE              | 23245 |    13M| 45106  (1)| 00:09:02 |
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
      1 - access(UPPER("FSRC"."FAX_NUMBER")=UPPER("FS"."DESTINATION"))
      3 - filter("FSRC"."IS_DELETED"='N')
      4 - access("GBM"."BU_ID"="FSRC"."BUID")
          filter("GBM"."BU_ID" IS NOT NULL)
      5 - filter(UPPER("FS"."FAX_STATUS")=SYS_OP_C2C(:B1))
    21 rows selected.
    --NEW with indexes.
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 665032407
    | Id  | Operation                        | Name                    | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time    |
    |  0 | SELECT STATEMENT                |                          |  5995 |  3986K|  3117  (1)| 00:00:38 |
    |*  1 |  HASH JOIN                      |                          |  5995 |  3986K|  3117  (1)| 00:00:38 |
    |  2 |  NESTED LOOPS                  |                          |  611 | 47658 |    20  (5)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  3 |    VIEW                          | index$_join$_002        |  2290 |  165K|    20  (5)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  4 |    HASH JOIN                    |                          |      |      |            |      |
    |*  5 |      HASH JOIN                  |                          |      |      |            |      |
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    |  6 |      BITMAP CONVERSION TO ROWIDS|                          |  2290 |  165K|    1  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |*  7 |        BITMAP INDEX SINGLE VALUE | IDX_IS_DELETED_RAM      |      |      |            |      |
    |  8 |      INDEX FAST FULL SCAN      | IDX_BUID_RAM            |  2290 |  165K|    8  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  9 |      INDEX FAST FULL SCAN        | IDX_FAX_NUMBER_RAM      |  2290 |  165K|    14  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |* 10 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN              | GLOBAL_BU_MAPPING_BUID  |    1 |    4 |    0  (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  11 |  TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID    | FAX_STAGE                | 23245 |    13M|  3096  (1)| 00:00:38 |
    |* 12 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN              | IDX_UPPER_FAX_STATUS_RAM |  9298 |      |  2434  (1)| 00:00:30 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
      1 - access(UPPER("DESTINATION")="FSRC"."SYS_NC00035$")
      3 - filter("FSRC"."IS_DELETED"='N')
      4 - access(ROWID=ROWID)
      5 - access(ROWID=ROWID)
      7 - access("FSRC"."IS_DELETED"='N')
      10 - access("GBM"."BU_ID"="FSRC"."BUID")
          filter("GBM"."BU_ID" IS NOT NULL)
      12 - access(UPPER("FAX_STATUS")=SYS_OP_C2C(:B1))
    31 rows selected
    Please confirm on the DBA comment.Is this bitmap index locks rows in my case.
    Thanks.>

  • Master Dataload is taking long time to complete

    Hi
    In last couple of weeks, we are experience the delay for master dataload job. These dataload should take 5-8 minute to complete but it is taking more then 5 hour to complete. here we are using process chain for master dataload.
    Any idea? We don't understand where to start to check the root cause of this problem.
    Regards
    Amar

    Hi Freinds
    Some update of our master dataload. Still not resolved.
    Seem to me, our problem is related to Hierarchy in BW server.It is taking long time to update the hierarchy in BW server. As i told you, problem occur only when loading master dataload. For transaction dataload, no IDOC get stuck in R/3 (NPR) server. There are enough resources in both R/3 and BW server for trfc.
    There are total 9 hierarchy in the master dataload that is delaying in the process for update. If you have seen this type of problem for the following hierarchy, pls update me.
    A     0ACCOUNT (InfoSource)
         Hierarchy
    1     Fin statement vers FSV5
    2     Cost Element by fun area
    B     0COSTCENTER (InfoSource)
         Hierarchy
    3     Mitel Network
    4     NA MNS Total
    5     CEO
    6     Global Support Cost center
    C     0COORDER (infosource)
         Hierarchy
    7     Total R&D (Ron Wellard)
    8     RD YRD1
    9     RD YRD2
    Regards
    Amarjit

Maybe you are looking for