LOV criteria item gets cleared

If typing in a value in the messageLovInput and tabbing out clears a criteria field, check whether this criteria field is not also marked as a result.
You cannot specify an item except for the messageLovInput itself to be both criteria and result at the same time. This means that in your LOV map, you should either specify an item as "Criteria Item" or "Result Item", but not both.

Did you go through the Dev guide?
--Shiv

Similar Messages

How to set lov criteria item dynamically

Hi,
pl let me know how can we set the lov criteria item programatically.
i have 2 lov's.if the 1st lov has a null value then 2nd lov shud have a null value.
but if 1st lov has a value then 2nd lov has to populate values based on the value in the 1st.
pl do help me
thanks

Hi,
Can you check the OAMessageLovInput
s addLovRelations api.
Eg.
OAMessageLovInputBean mlib =(OAMessageLovInputBean)webBean.findChildRecursive("id of lov");
mlib.addLovRelations(pageContext, "inputTest", // base page item
"Empname", // lov item
LOV_RESULT, // direction
LOV_REQUIRED_NO);
mlib.addLovRelations(pageContext, "inputTest", // base page item
"Empname", // lov item
LOV_CRITERIA, // direction
LOV_REQUIRED_NO); // Enable Look
Thanks.
With Regards,
Kali.
OSSI.

Criteria item is not being used in the LOV query

Hi All,
I have one 'messageChoice' bean which is associated with a view
I have configured it correctly
I have one 'messageLOVInput' bean
above 'mesaageChoice' acts as criteria item for 'messageLOVInput'
I created two maps one for each beans
When I select a value from 'messageChoice' and click LOV button
now LOV window should query based on the value from choice..
but its not at all taking choice selection in the query criteria...
Where I am doing mistake..?
Thnaks
-Praveen

Hi,
we are gathering JDeveloper 11 technology preview related question in a separate forum
JDeveloper and OC4J 11g Technology Preview
Frank

Open Item not getting Cleared automatically

Dear Sir,
For a GL "Cenvat Clearing" , we have ticked the option "open Item Management" in FS00 .
Our business scenario is as below :
After MIGO , we do excise posting using J1IEX and here in the posted Fi document the GL "Cenvat Clearing" gets Credited . Subsequently during the MIRO this GL i.e "Cenvat Claering" gets Debited .
My problem is that when I see in FBL3n for this GL the relevant transaction still appear under the open Items . Pl guide me , as what is the reason for this entry not getting cleared automatically .
Regards
B Mittal
Regar

PO number cannot be taken as sort feild hence the value is in blank always.
You need to identify some value for this feild and as a process you need to tell your users to incorporate the same at the time of doing MIRO.
Or other wise you can take out the assignment of sort key to this GL account, and as a process you can instruct your user to use reference feild and input a value. If you fell that this is a tedious process,
the Identify another feild that is common for both debit and credit line items and try to post with a common valuie using, one ABAP program which will update this feild. Mind that this feild need to be in the OB74.
reward if useful
sarma

Lov returned items are not cleared in Jheadstart 11.1.1.4.26

We are using Jheadstart 11.1.1.4.26 with Jdeveloper 11.1.1.4
HR Testcase:
Form UI
Lov on the Manager_FirstName
returns
ManagerId -> ManagerId
FirstName -> Manager_Firstname
LastName -> Manager_Lastname
1: Select a manager from the LOV popup. ManagerId,FirstName,LastName are filled
2: Clear the Manager_Firstname from the Lov inputext. Returned Values should be automatically cleared (at least they used to in previous version). They dont in this version.
I am sending a testcase to [email protected]
Regards

Thanks for looking at the testcase.
I emailed you a new one with screenshots of the steps required to reproduce it.
Conserning the previous test case I have sent, you are correct. I made a mistake by returning the
ManagerId back to ManagerId where it should be EmployeeId copied back to ManagerId.
However the items are not cleared in my Environment if you set a value from the LOV popup and then clear the value of the textinput. (No saving should be performed between these two steps).
If you perform a save between these two steps the items are all cleared.
Are you using Jdeveloper 11.1.1.4 ?
Regards
Vasileios
Edited by: spooker on 6 Μαϊ 2012 10:03 πμ
I am attaching another testcase with steps here. This is different from the one I emailed you but illustrates the same issue.
It is as if the item the Lov is based on does not autosubmit when it loses focus (click somewhere in the page)
steps to reproduce word document --> http://herosh.com/download/10867921/testcase.doc.html (just click the green download link)
testcase--> http://herosh.com/download/10867918/HR.rar.html (just click the green download link)
Edited by: spooker on 6 Μαϊ 2012 11:05 πμ

UWL items not getting cleared after performing action

Hello
We are on EP 7.0.
We are experiencing a strange behaviorin UWL.
When end users receive workitems in their inbox and they take the appropriate actions, the workitems still stay in the inbox. Normally they should no longer appear.
I have tried the refresh in the UWL iview but no luck.
It seems to work in DEV and other landscape. It does no work in Production. The software installation of UWL are the same across all landscapes.
Is there any other setting that is required. In SAP GUI this is not an issue.
Any feedback or tips would be helpful. thanks.
Regards,
Sunil

Hi,
As far as I can remember, this is a known limitation of UWL.
Please, check this thread : UWL work item not getting cleared
I am unsure whether you use the correct button the refresh the UWL (it is well hidden!), check the slide 6 in this document :
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/20f4843e-314f-2a10-2a88-8c4afa20dda6&overridelayout=true
Best regards,
Guillaume

Can we have mesageChoice Item as Lov Criteria

Hi Guys,
Just wanted to know if it is possible to have a messageChoice items as the Lov Criteria. If not what is the alternative.
My scenario is that i have a messageChoice which i want to use to narrow down the Lov search result. For example: messageChoice based on VO with Display Attribute: Application Name and Value Attribute: Application ID. Then Lov based on LovVO that returns progamId or programName relevant to applicationId from messageChoice.
Regards,
Shoaib.

Shoaib,
You can do that. You just need to put proper criteria mappings to make messagechoice item as the criteria. Though keep a note of the fact that the LOV field on the base page should always be configured as a search criteria item.
--Shiv

GR/IR Clearing a/c not getting cleared..

Dear All,
My GR/IR clearing account is not getting cleared automatically after Invoice posting..is it the standard behavior or anything
missing?
For example- GR/IR Clearing a/c is 13110100,when GRN is done it is getting credited and once invoice is posted it gets
debited so it should show cleared when we run FS10N / FBL3N
please let me know whether it is needed to clear manually?
Naren

Hi
F.13 is for executing the setting configured under Financial Accounting -> General Ledger Account -> Business Transactions ->Open item clearing - > Prepare Automatic clearing. In this place, the GL account needs to be updated with the relevant criteria like, what are the fields to be matched for clearing like Reference field, assignment, etc.
After that, if F.13 is executed for this GL account then it will clear based on the criteria specified above.
Hope it clarifies
Regards
Lakshmanan Krishnan

Last line item gets changed to first line item for cs01

HI experts,
           I have writen a BDC for Tcode cs01.
I am facing a problem in that.If sucppose there are 4 line items,
the first three line itmes are getting uploaded correctly but the kast line item gets changed to first line item.
below is part of my code.
DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM T_MAT COMPARING MATNR.
SORT T_MAT BY MATNR. "HEADER DATA
SORT T_BOM BY MATNR1. "ITEM DATA
*CLEAR : COUNTER, ITEM_NO.
LOOP AT T_MAT INTO W_MAT.
REFRESH GT_BDCDATA.
CLEAR   GW_BDCDATA.
perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPLCSDI' '0100'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
                              'RC29N-STLAN'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                              '/00'.
perform bdc_field       using 'RC29N-MATNR' W_MAT-MATNR.
                             'lejn44001'.
perform bdc_field       using 'RC29N-WERKS' W_MAT-PLANT.
                             '4600'.
perform bdc_field       using 'RC29N-STLAN' W_MAT-BOM_USAGE.
                             '1'.
*perform bdc_field       using 'RC29N-DATUV'
                             '22.06.2010'.
perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPLCSDI' '0110'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                              '/00'.
perform bdc_field       using 'RC29K-BMENG'
                              '1'.
perform bdc_field       using 'RC29K-STLST'
                              '1'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
                              'RC29K-EXSTL'.
perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPLCSDI' '0111'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
                              'RC29K-LABOR'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                              '/00'.
LOOP AT T_BOM INTO W_BOM WHERE MATNR1 = W_MAT-MATNR.
cnt = cnt + 1.
CONCATENATE '0' CNT INTO VAR.
   ADD 1 TO COUNTER.
   ITEM_NO = 10 * COUNTER.
   OVERLAY ITEM_NO WITH '0000'.
   W_BOM-ITM_NO = ITEM_NO.
perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPLCSDI' '0140'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
                              'RC29P-POSTP(03)'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                              '/00'.
CONCATENATE 'RC29P-IDNRK(' var ')' INTO new_mark.
PERFORM bdc_field USING new_mark W_BOM-BOM_COMP.
clear new_mark.
CONCATENATE 'RC29P-MENGE(' var ')' INTO new_mark.
PERFORM bdc_field USING new_mark W_BOM-QTY.
clear new_mark.
CONCATENATE 'RC29P-POSTP(' VAR ')' INTO NEW_MARK.
perform bdc_field USING new_mark W_BOM-ITM_CAT.
clear new_mark.
clear VAR.
ENDLOOP.
loop at T_BOM INTO W_BOM WHERE MATNR1 = W_MAT-MATNR.
perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPLCSDI' '0130'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                              '/00'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
                              'RC29P-POSNR'.
perform bdc_field       using 'RC29P-POSNR' V_CNT.
                             '0010'.
perform bdc_field       using 'RC29P-IDNRK' W_BOM-BOM_COMP.
                             'PURCHASECOST'.
perform bdc_field       using 'RC29P-MENGE' W_BOM-QTY.
                             '20'.
perform bdc_field       using 'RC29P-MEINS'
                              'M'.
perform bdc_dynpro      using 'SAPLCSDI' '0131'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_OKCODE'
                              '/00'.
perform bdc_field       using 'BDC_CURSOR'
                              'RC29P-POTX1'.
perform bdc_field       using 'RC29P-SANKA'
                              'X'.
V_CNT = V_CNT + 10.
ENDLOOP.
CLEAR V_CNT.
perform screen_data. " IS ALL ABOUT CALLING TRANSACTION......
ENDLOOP.
following is The input file format m providing.
Material     Plant     BOM usage     Item No     Item Cat     BOM component     QUANTITY
WRJN46106     4600     1     10     z     PURCHASECOST     10
WRJN46106     4600     1     20     z     SOURCINGCOST     15
WRJN46106     4600     1     30     z     INVRESERVE     12
WRJN46106     4600     1     40     Z     INVRESERVE1     20
in this the first 3 line items are coming correctly but the 4th one gets changed to
first line item.
e.g INVRESERVE1 changes to purchasecost.
plz help.
Thanks n regards,
Ashmita singh.

Hi Suneel,
I hardly can't believe that. There must be an mistake by your own in the smartform itself. Would you please share some screens or better, the smartform-XML itself. You can pass out everything else and just share the table and a dataset to try this.
I'm pretty sure that there is something wrong with the settings or even the loop itself. I never faced a problem like that or even heared about such things.
I would love to have a look inside.
Before you share it, create a new one with just the table inside and try it with the same data. Perhaps it is just of to much folders or something like that, so the generating comes in trouble.
Regards
Florian

Interest calculation on Open items and cleared items

Dear Experts
I am trying to do needful configuration for interest indicator on which interest can be calculated for open items and cleared items as well. But, system is calculating interest for open items properly, but not calculating interest on cleared items with same interest indicator, I am repeatedly getting error "interest calculation indicator is not compatible with this type of interest calculation"
Is it possible to use same interest indicator for open line items and cleared line items of customer?
If possible, request you share the needful config steps to do same.
points will be awarded for usful reply.
Best regards,
S. Habib Pasha.

Hello Habib,
depending on the requests you can setup a item interest calculation or a balance interest calculation "Define calculation types".
IIC: check settings (item selection, all cleared items, only items with payment, no cleared items) "Prepare item interest calculation"
I guess you have setup the item interest calculation - maybe you have mixed some entries with BAIC.
Check in "Prepare account balance interest calculation" whether you have entries with the indicator you want to use.
At least check your entries in "Define time-based Terms" If you have entries with Balance account interest calculation the system gives even an error.
Hope this is helpfull.
Best regards
Horst

Display between open items and cleared items in FS10N

hello all,
I have the following problem.
When I go with FS10N with double click on the initial balance of an G/L account I get the message:
"A large number of line items were selected
Recommendation: Only display open items
Do you want to display open items only?
Yes or NO?"
If I click yes, I get the open items only and if I click no, I get the cleared items. The strange thing is that I get same line items in both reports. For example, I can see same line item, one time as cleared (when I click no) and one time as open (when I click yes).
Do you know the reason for this? For both reports I click on initial balance, so key date should be 01.01.2009, if I run FS10N for fiscal year 2009. Right?
The user is confused in this situation because he is not sure if the item is cleared or not.
thanks for quick reply!
Daniel Nicula.

If you click yes, you get the open items only , but if I click no, you don't get the cleared items only. With NO, you get ALL items.

Document splitting: Items for clearing 0010/100062508/2010/001 not found

HI Gurus,
I hava issue with FC valuation. I have done configurtin for FC Valuation of GL A/c i.e, Long Term loan paybles which is created as Open Item management.
It is working fine post the entries at the end of May and reversed the same on 01.06.2010 in development system. i have moved saem request to Acceptance client and testing the same scenario. But i am getting the following error.
"Document splitting: Items for clearing 0010/100062508/2010/001 not found
Message no. GLT0002
Diagnosis
Document splitting cannot perform clearing because it was not possible to find complete splitting information on the items to be cleared (company code 0010, document number 100062508, fiscal year 2010, item 001).
System Response
Clearing cannot be performed and the document cannot be posted.
Procedure
Exclude the affected item from clearing.
It may be that this item was not posted with active document splitting. In this case, this item or document would have to be migrated."
I have checked the docuemnt splitting config . In two systems it was same and doc.splitting was configurated very long back.
Could any one help on the above error
Thanks in advance
PAVAN

Hi Pavan,
Please note the following, the error GLT0002 is normally caused by a change done in your customizing for splitting. Since you mentioned that this is happening for one company code, it seems to be that one change was made only for this company code in your SPRO settings.
For example if you have activated open item managment subsequently on account or another example would be that you posted document prior to activation of document splitting.
Please see section 5 of note 891144:
Items posted while open item management was still inactive in G/L account master data cannot be cleared after open item management has been activated subequently if New G/L document splitting is active.
Therefore, if document splitting is active, open item management should never be activated subsequently on accounts to which documents had already been posted with inactive open item management.
Review note 891144 in full. I believe that this will help you resolve the issue.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

How to get CLEAR photos on the Touch?

I love my iPod touch, but there's one thing that has always bothered my - photos sync'd through iPhoto-->iTunes are grainy and have bad color. Until now, I've been unable to prove this - but finally I've found a way to prove that it's not just in my head. So, I'm wondering if anyone knows a way to get clear photos on the Touch ... ?
First of all, after using the app "PhoneView" to download my sync'd pictures from my iPod BACK to my Mac, I've noticed that the resolutions are different for pictures, depending on whether their orientation is portrait or landscape. For portrait 4x6 images, the resolution is indeed 480x320. However, for landscape orientation, the resolution is consistently 640x426. I think it's kind of odd that iTunes would be sizing photos differently depending on their orientation ... I usually have my full-resolution pictures in iPhoto and sync those images through iTunes, but today I also tried manually resizing my pictures to 640x426 (landscape) and 480x320 (portrait) and then syncing them as a folder, rather than through iPhoto. The results were the same as doing it through iPhoto: disappointing. I've put together a sample, below:
!http://www.mavisxp.com/ipod/iTunes_compression.png!
and another example here.
As you can see, even the manually resized images are turning out horribly grainy. What's even more disappointing than the image quality, however, is the file size: my original JPG is 84KB, but the iTunes' "optimized" JPG is five times as large (456KB) with inaccurate color and awful grain to boot. I mean, it looks like someone dribbled a basketball all over a glossy print (seriously, that grain's pattern is an exact match with the grain on a basketball) ... Is it supposed to look like that?
+After examining the EXIF data for both pictures, I've noticed another oddity which explains the bad color at least - when iTunes 'optimizes' pictures for the iPod, it apparently assigns them your monitor's color profile! Was this just an oversight that has yet to be corrected? When I export my pictures from Lightroom to iPhoto, I always use the sRGB profile because it's the most standard profile to use when sharing pictures (posting online, emailing, etc) ... My iMac's color profile is a custom Spyder2Pro profile, but that profile is only accurate for THIS MONITOR - certainly not my iPod! Anyway, I've uploaded the original pictures if anyone is interested in checking them out - you can download them in a zip archive here.+
This is the second iPod I've noticed grainy pictures with, so I know it's not just defective hardware. So I guess my question is simple: does anyone know of ANY way to get clear photos sync'd with the iPod Touch or iPhone? I've poked through plists in iTunes.app and preferences, etc - but I haven't found anything. Any ideas?

Thanks for the reply, Duddo.
I guess you're right, Apple probably just wanted to simplify the syncing process and make it consistent for all users. And no, most users probably won't notice that awful grain and poor color reproduction.
That said, I think it's a real shame to waste the capabilities of the iPhone/Touch like this. Wasting storage space is asinine (increasing file size 5X when 'optimizing'?!) not only due to the limited storage space available in the first place, but also due to the fact that smaller files are quicker and easier to load and manipulate. Overwriting color profiles is just sloppy coding, an oversight - hopefully one they'll soon fix. But the biggest problem for me is that the pinch/zoom functionality is USELESS because if you zoom in at all, the grain is so blatantly obvious. I found an old discussion thread on another forum which mentions this problem, according to several posters there, the grain problem was introduced AFTER the iPhone launched (meaning it can likely be corrected in a firmware update or an iTunes update) ... You can check out that discussion here, if you're interested:
http://www.everythingicafe.com/forum/iphone/not-optimize-photos-8264.html
Anyway thanks again for your reply. I'll keep my eye on this thread and if I hear anything about this issue (or a workaround) I'll be sure to post it!

Vendor Account not getting Cleared.

Dear All,
First of all thanks everyone for your support till date.
I have an issue. When I am trying to clear a vendor account from F-44 its not getting cleared. Its showing a negative balance of Cash discount and is not getting adjusted with any account.
However when I am processing the open item for the same vendor in FBL1N. The total is 0.
Can any one suggest how to go ahead and clear this account.
Thanks & regards
Om Prakash gupta

Dear All,
Any updates on this issue as it has become a serious problem here. There ia an objection from Auditor.
Kindly Suggest.
Regards
OM

FB01 Invoice posting..When & how do this invoice document get cleared...

Hi,
I posted a document in FB01.
when ever i post it
the above document is showing in Open item in FBL1N (t-code).
when& how to this document show in cleared item..?
Documet type :VI......tried VO,BM,BT
Specification:
Posting invoice PSKY : 31
Vendor : XXXXXX
towards:
GL account : XXXXXXXX
Debt PSKY : 40
can Someone help in how to clear this document...!
possible way for automatic payment will be good...
Thanks,
Praveen

Hi Praveen,
U have to understand the functionality of open and cleared line items. When u use posting key 31, u are posting a vendor invoice. Any invoice (or any document for that matter) when posted will have the open status.
Now that invoice will get cleared when it is actually cleared against another document (outgoing payment in ur case)
Goto F-53 and give the required inputs (amount ,vendor number , bank account etc) and process any of the open items(ie original invoice) in that vendor account. Once that payment document get posted, it clears the original invoice also. Just test it and u'll understand.
The same can be done in automatic payment also, but u need to do all the customizing in FBZP and then run the program through F110. That also clears the open vendor invoices.
Best Regards
Vimal

LOV criteria item gets cleared

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for