Lync 2013 dial plan & Exchange UM subscriber access number

I am using 3-digit extensions in Lync in the format of tel:+15554443333;ext=100
What would be the correct way to set the Exchange subscriber access number to 999? Would I put in +999 in Exchange or +15554443333;ext=999 <-- I don't think Exchange takes this kind of format...

I got it working by doing that.
Exchange UM Access Number: +15554443333;ext=999
OcsUmUtil contact object: +15554443333;ext=999
It works now

Similar Messages

Subscriber access number.. cannot change!

I'm trying to change the subscriber access number. I have Lync 2013 and I need to assign the number to a user now.
The problem is I change the subscriber access number but it still remains. I even changed the contacts associated with it. I ran updates to the address book on Lync and everything.
However I still call the number and it takes you to the Exchange voicemail!
Am I missing a place to remove this number from Exchange and Lync?

It eventually started working. Took about an hour. Don't know what happened

Lync 2013 SQL versus Exchange Archiving

Our organization has setup an internal lab for Lync and is trying to decide what the best option would be for deploying archiving with Lync and what the pros vs cons are.
We currently have one Lync 2013 FE Server and an Exchange 2010 server, which I already know does not support archiving. Would it be best to deploy a SQL server for archiving or upgrade Exchange 2010 to 2013? We can do either, but was is the recommended approach
and best practice/pros/cons?
I was planning on utilizing SQL server as the preferred for approach and so we don't have to upgrade Exchange -- just seems easier and will keep any additional load off the Exchange server and once deployed to a production environment.
Thanks.

Agree with Michael.
This data stored in Archiving database is not searchable, but it can be exported to formats that are searchable using other tools.
You can check the difference between these two archiving options at
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj204900.aspx.
Lisa Zheng
TechNet Community Support

Lync 2013 presence in Exchange 2013 OWA - 0xc3e93d6a SIPPROXY_E_CONNECTION_UNKNOWN_SERVER

Single Lync 2013 server on Server 2012 R2
Single Exchange 2013 server on Server 2012
Latest patches and updates installed on both servers
Internal Certificate Authority issued certificates
Subject name on EX13 certificate is same as hostname and configured on SMTP, IIS, POP, IMAP, and UM services (Do I even need UM installed?)
I have been working on this for a few days now. I have tried all the blogs and TechNet articles I could find. I even created a list of commands to configure the Exchange and Lync servers.
**Exchange Server
Configure-EnterprisePartnerApplication.ps1 -AuthMetaDataUrl
https://c2nsi-svr-lync1.cantrelloffice.home/metadata/json/1 -ApplicationType Lync
Get-ExchangeCertificate | where-object {$_.services -like “*iis*” } | fl subject, issuer, services, thumbprint
Get-OwaVirtualDirectory -ShowBackEndVirtualDirectories -server c2nsi-svr-ex13.cantrelloffice.home | Set-OwaVirtualDirectory -InstantMessagingEnabled $true -InstantMessagingType OCS -InstantMessagingCertificateThumbprint E32937A41A7658AB8277BE6BD9BEF28D4DC43BFC
–InstantMessagingServerName c2nsi-svr-lync1.cantrelloffice.home
Get-OwaVirtualDirectory | Set-OwaVirtualDirectory –InstantMessagingEnabled $True -InstantMessagingType OCS
Notepad "E:\Program Files\Exchange\V15\ClientAccess\Owa\web.config"
<add key="IMCertificateThumbprint" value="E32937A41A7658AB8277BE6BD9BEF28D4DC43BFC" />
<add key="IMServerName" value="c2nsi-svr-lync1.cantrelloffice.home" />
C:\Windows\System32\Inetsrv\Appcmd.exe recycle apppool /apppool.name:"MSExchangeOWAAppPool"
**Lync Server
Get-Cspool | where-object {$_.services –like “*UserServer*”} | fl site, fqdn
Set-CsOAuthConfiguration -Identity global -Realm "cantrelloffice.home" -ExchangeAutodiscoverUrl "https://c2nsi-svr-ex13.cantrelloffice.home/autodiscover/autodiscover.svc
New-CsPartnerApplication -identity Exchange -ApplicationTrustLevel Full -MetadataUrl
https://c2nsi-svr-ex13.cantrelloffice.home/autodiscover/metadata/json/1
New-CsTrustedApplicationPool -Identity c2nsi-svr-ex13.cantrelloffice.home -Registrar c2nsi-svr-lync1.cantrelloffice.home -Site CantrellOffice -RequiresReplication $False
New-CsTrustedApplication -ApplicationId OutlookWebAccess -TrustedApplicationPoolFqdn c2nsi-svr-ex13.cantrelloffice.home -Port 5199
Enable-CsTopology
Anyone able to help me?

Excerpt from OCSLogger SIPStack log file:
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026d8 (SIPStack,LiteralToIPv6Context::Clear:IPv6Literal.cpp(272))( 00000034F1EBDE60 ) Clear
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026d9 (SIPStack,LiteralToIPv6Context::Append:IPv6Literal.cpp(191))( 00000034F1EBDE60 ) Not an IPv6 literal: 192.168.1.213
TL_NOISE(TF_STACKTRACE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026da ((Shared),CSIPGenericParamList::GetParamValue:SIPGenericParam.cpp(231))( 00000034F35DFBE0 ) Enter
TL_VERBOSE(TF_STACKTRACE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026db ((Shared),CSIPGenericParamList::GetParamValue:SIPGenericParam.cpp(266))( 00000034F35DFBE0 ) Exit - param=[ms-received-ipv6] not found. Returned 0xC3E93C34(SIPPROXY_E_FIELD_NOT_EXIST)
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026dc (SIPStack,CHeadersHash::GetNextHeader:HeadersHash.cpp(437))( 00000034F71F0438 ) Enter - current header [00000034F35DF9D8]
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026dd (SIPStack,CHeadersHash::GetNextHeader:HeadersHash.cpp(469))( 00000034F71F0438 ) Exit - returns header [0000000000000000]
TL_VERBOSE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026de (SIPStack,CSIPMessage::GetNextHeader<CSIPHeader>:SIPMessage.h(2545))( 00000034F71F0070 ) Exit - no more headers found
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026df (SIPStack,LiteralToIPv6Context::Clear:IPv6Literal.cpp(272))( 00000034F1EBDE60 ) Clear
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026e0 (SIPStack,CSIPUrl::AppendLiteralToIPv6Mappings:SIPUrl.cpp(1659))( 00000034F35D8F10 ) Enter
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026e1 (SIPStack,CURI::AppendLiteralToIPv6Mappings:SIPUrl.cpp(420))( 00000034F35D8F10 ) Enter
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026e2 (SIPStack,LiteralToIPv6Context::Append:IPv6Literal.cpp(191))( 00000034F1EBDE60 ) Not an IPv6 literal: 127.0.0.1
TL_VERBOSE(TF_COMPONENT) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026e3 (SIPStack,CSIPRequest::ValidateInboundHeaders:SIPRequest.cpp(1612))[3583893925]( 00000034F71F0070 ) Exit
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026e4 (SIPStack,CHeadersHash::GetHeader:HeadersHash.cpp(381))( 00000034F71F0438 ) enter. headerID[0xf]
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026e5 (SIPStack,CHeadersHash::GetHeader:HeadersHash.cpp(413))( 00000034F71F0438 ) exit. header[00000034F35DC150]
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026e6 (SIPStack,CMaxForwardsHeader::Parse:MaxForwardsHeader.cpp(42))( 00000034F35DC150 ) enter.
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026e7 (SIPStack,CMaxForwardsHeader::Parse:MaxForwardsHeader.cpp(46))( 00000034F35DC150 ) exit. already parsed.
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026e8 (SIPStack,HeaderSigner::GatherRouteHeaders:SIPMessage.h(174))( 00000034F71F0070 ) Exit - header 00000034F35DC150 found
TL_NOISE(TF_NETWORK) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026e9 (SIPStack,NegotiateLogic::ParseRequireHeader:NegotiateLogic.cpp(737))[1353035682]( 00000034F5E7A178 ) Enter
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026ea (SIPStack,CHeadersHash::GetHeader:HeadersHash.cpp(381))( 00000034F71F0438 ) enter. headerID[0x23]
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026eb (SIPStack,CHeadersHash::GetHeader:HeadersHash.cpp(390))( 00000034F71F0438 ) exit. no headers
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026ec (SIPStack,CHeadersHash::GetHeader:HeadersHash.cpp(381))( 00000034F71F0438 ) enter. headerID[0x2d]
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026ed (SIPStack,CHeadersHash::GetHeader:HeadersHash.cpp(413))( 00000034F71F0438 ) exit. header[00000034F35D8D00]
TL_INFO(TF_NETWORK) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026ee (SIPStack,NegotiateLogic::ParseRequireHeader:NegotiateLogic.cpp(758))[1353035682]( 00000034F5E7A178 ) Found legacy compression request
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026ef (SIPStack,CHeadersHash::GetHeader:HeadersHash.cpp(381))( 00000034F71F0438 ) enter. headerID[0x2d]
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026f0 (SIPStack,CHeadersHash::GetHeader:HeadersHash.cpp(413))( 00000034F71F0438 ) exit. header[00000034F35D8D00]
TL_VERBOSE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026f1 (SIPStack,CSIPMultiEntryHeader::Parse:GenericMultiEntryHeader.cpp(88))( 00000034F35D8D00 ) Unparsed is [LZ77-8K]
TL_VERBOSE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026f2 ((Shared),FindCharNotQuoted:parseutil.cpp(975))could not find character:","(0x2c).
TL_NOISE(TF_STACKTRACE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026f3 (SIPStack,CSIPMultiEntryHeader::Parse:GenericMultiEntryHeader.cpp(154))( 00000034F35D8D00 ) exit.
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026f4 (SIPStack,CHeadersHash::GetNextHeader:HeadersHash.cpp(437))( 00000034F71F0438 ) Enter - current header [00000034F35D8D00]
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026f5 (SIPStack,CHeadersHash::GetNextHeader:HeadersHash.cpp(469))( 00000034F71F0438 ) Exit - returns header [0000000000000000]
TL_NOISE(TF_NETWORK) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026f6 (SIPStack,NegotiateLogic::ParseRequireHeader:NegotiateLogic.cpp(846))( 00000034F5E7A178 ) Exit. Returned 0x03E93C01(SIPPROXY_S_MESSAGE_CONSUMED)
TL_NOISE(TF_NETWORK) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026f7 (SIPStack,NegotiateLogic::ProcessPeerFeatureInfo:NegotiateLogic.cpp(1256))( 1353035682 )( 00000034F5E7A178 ) Enter - 00000034F71F0070
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026f8 (SIPStack,CHeadersHash::GetHeader:HeadersHash.cpp(381))( 00000034F71F0438 ) enter. headerID[0x27]
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026f9 (SIPStack,CHeadersHash::GetHeader:HeadersHash.cpp(413))( 00000034F71F0438 ) exit. header[00000034F35D8768]
TL_VERBOSE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026fa (SIPStack,CSIPMultiEntryHeader::Parse:GenericMultiEntryHeader.cpp(88))( 00000034F35D8768 ) Unparsed is [NewNegotiate]
TL_VERBOSE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026fb ((Shared),FindCharNotQuoted:parseutil.cpp(975))could not find character:","(0x2c).
TL_NOISE(TF_STACKTRACE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026fc (SIPStack,CSIPMultiEntryHeader::Parse:GenericMultiEntryHeader.cpp(154))( 00000034F35D8768 ) exit.
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026fd (SIPStack,CHeadersHash::GetNextHeader:HeadersHash.cpp(437))( 00000034F71F0438 ) Enter - current header [00000034F35D8768]
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026fe (SIPStack,CHeadersHash::GetNextHeader:HeadersHash.cpp(469))( 00000034F71F0438 ) Exit - returns header [00000034F35D8978]
TL_VERBOSE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.000026ff (SIPStack,CSIPMultiEntryHeader::Parse:GenericMultiEntryHeader.cpp(88))( 00000034F35D8978 ) Unparsed is [ECC]
TL_VERBOSE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.00002700 ((Shared),FindCharNotQuoted:parseutil.cpp(975))could not find character:","(0x2c).
TL_NOISE(TF_STACKTRACE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.00002701 (SIPStack,CSIPMultiEntryHeader::Parse:GenericMultiEntryHeader.cpp(154))( 00000034F35D8978 ) exit.
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.00002702 (SIPStack,CHeadersHash::GetNextHeader:HeadersHash.cpp(437))( 00000034F71F0438 ) Enter - current header [00000034F35D8978]
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.00002703 (SIPStack,CHeadersHash::GetNextHeader:HeadersHash.cpp(469))( 00000034F71F0438 ) Exit - returns header [0000000000000000]
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.00002704 (SIPStack,CHeadersHash::GetHeader:HeadersHash.cpp(381))( 00000034F71F0438 ) enter. headerID[0x5]
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.00002705 (SIPStack,CHeadersHash::GetHeader:HeadersHash.cpp(413))( 00000034F71F0438 ) exit. header[00000034F35DB448]
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.00002706 (SIPStack,CFromToHeader::Parse:FromToHeader.cpp(82))( 00000034F35DB448 ) Enter
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.00002707 (SIPStack,SIPHeaderUriParam::ParseHelper:SIPHeaderUriParam.cpp(46))( 00000034F35DB448 ) Enter
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.00002708 (SIPStack,SIPHeaderUriParam::ParseHelper:SIPHeaderUriParam.cpp(51))( 00000034F35DB448 ) Exit - already parsed
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.00002709 (SIPStack,CFromToHeader::Parse:FromToHeader.cpp(90))( 00000034F35DB448 ) Exit
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.0000270a (SIPStack,HeaderSigner::GatherRouteHeaders:SIPMessage.h(174))( 00000034F71F0070 ) Exit - header 00000034F35DB448 found
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.0000270b (SIPStack,CFromToHeader::Parse:FromToHeader.cpp(82))( 00000034F35DB448 ) Enter
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.0000270c (SIPStack,SIPHeaderUriParam::ParseHelper:SIPHeaderUriParam.cpp(46))( 00000034F35DB448 ) Enter
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.0000270d (SIPStack,SIPHeaderUriParam::ParseHelper:SIPHeaderUriParam.cpp(51))( 00000034F35DB448 ) Exit - already parsed
TL_NOISE(TF_PARSE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.0000270e (SIPStack,CFromToHeader::Parse:FromToHeader.cpp(90))( 00000034F35DB448 ) Exit
TL_VERBOSE(TF_NETWORK) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.0000270f (SIPStack,CIpAddress::SetIp:IpAddress.cpp(42))( 00000034F1EBE970 ) Enter
TL_VERBOSE(TF_NETWORK) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.00002710 (SIPStack,CIpAddress::SetIp:IpAddress.cpp(55))Enter
TL_VERBOSE(TF_NETWORK) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.00002711 (SIPStack,CIpAddress::SetIp:IpAddress.cpp(55))Exit - SIPRtlIpv6StringToAddress failed (WINERROR=C000000D). Returns E_FAIL
TL_VERBOSE(TF_NETWORK) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.00002712 (SIPStack,CIpAddress::GetIPv4FromStringA:IpAddress.cpp(288))Enter
TL_VERBOSE(TF_NETWORK) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.00002713 (SIPStack,CIpAddress::GetIPv4FromStringA:IpAddress.cpp(301))Exit - SIPRtlIpv4StringToAddress failed (WINERROR=C000000D). Returns E_FAIL
TL_VERBOSE(TF_NETWORK) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.00002714 (SIPStack,CIpAddress::SetIp:IpAddress.cpp(80))( 00000034F1EBE970 ) Exit FALSE: c2nsi-svr-ex13.cantrelloffice.home is not an IP Address
TL_NOISE(TF_STACKTRACE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.00002715 ((Shared),CSIPGenericParamList::GetParamValue:SIPGenericParam.cpp(231))( 00000034F35DB478 ) Enter
TL_VERBOSE(TF_STACKTRACE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.00002716 ((Shared),CSIPGenericParamList::GetParamValue:SIPGenericParam.cpp(266))( 00000034F35DB478 ) Exit - param=[ms-fe] not found. Returned 0xC3E93C34(SIPPROXY_E_FIELD_NOT_EXIST)
TL_VERBOSE(TF_NETWORK) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.00002717 (SIPStack,PeerCertificateKey::CacheDisplayName:PeerIdentityKey.cpp(450))( 00000034F5E7A198 ) Exit - cert name [c2nsi-svr-ex13.cantrelloffice.home]
TL_VERBOSE(TF_NETWORK) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.00002718 (SIPStack,CPeerIdentityKey::SetDnsFqdn:PeerIdentityKey.cpp(810))( 00000034F5E7A198 ) Exit - set DNS FQDN to [c2nsi-svr-ex13.cantrelloffice.home]
TL_VERBOSE(TF_NETWORK) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.00002719 (SIPStack,NegotiateLogic::ProcessPeerIdentity:NegotiateLogic.cpp(1143))( 1353035682 )( 00000034F5E7A178 ) Enter - peer=[c2nsi-svr-ex13.cantrelloffice.home]
TL_VERBOSE(TF_NETWORK) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.0000271a (SIPStack,CConnection::ValidatePeerIdentity:Connection.cpp(544))( 1353035682 )( 00000034F5E68790 ) Enter
TL_NOISE(TF_NETWORK) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.0000271b (SIPStack,CPeerIdentity::FindLogicalPeer:PeerIdentity.cpp(86))( 1353035682 )( 00000034F1906F10 ) Enter
TL_NOISE(TF_NETWORK) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.0000271c (SIPStack,CPeerIdentity::LookupLogicalPeer_NonEP:PeerIdentity.cpp(124))( 1353035682 )( 00000034F1906F10 ) Enter
TL_VERBOSE(TF_STACKTRACE) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.0000271d (SIPStack,KSTImpl::QueryFirstByFqdn:KSTImpl.cpp(895))( 00000034F18FEF80 ) No matches for FQDN=[c2nsi-svr-ex13.cantrelloffice.home]
TL_VERBOSE(TF_COMPONENT) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.0000271e (SIPStack,RichResult::InternalAppendContext:RichResult.h(491))[1353035682]( 00000034F1EBE570 ) Context[0] is set to result [0xC3E93D6A(SIPPROXY_E_CONNECTION_UNKNOWN_SERVER)]
TL_VERBOSE(TF_NETWORK) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.0000271f (SIPStack,CPeerIdentity::LookupLogicalPeer_NonEP:PeerIdentity.cpp(154))( 1353035682 )( 00000034F1906F10 ) Exit - no match for the peer identity [c2nsi-svr-ex13.cantrelloffice.home]. Returned
0xC3E93D6A(SIPPROXY_E_CONNECTION_UNKNOWN_SERVER)
TL_ERROR(TF_NETWORK) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.00002720 (SIPStack,NegotiateLogic::ProcessPeerIdentity:NegotiateLogic.cpp(1155))( 1353035682 )( 00000034F5E7A178 ) Exit - failed to validate peer with S2S FQDN. Returned 0xC3E93D6A(SIPPROXY_E_CONNECTION_UNKNOWN_SERVER)
TL_ERROR(TF_CONNECTION) [1]11DC.1678::04/08/2014-01:15:49.882.00002721 (SIPStack,SIPAdminLog::WriteConnectionEvent:SIPAdminLog.cpp(389))[1353035682] $$begin_record
Severity: error
Text: The peer is not a configured server on this network interface
Peer-IP: 192.168.1.213:14339
Transport: TLS
Result-Code: 0xc3e93d6a SIPPROXY_E_CONNECTION_UNKNOWN_SERVER
Data: fqdn="c2nsi-svr-ex13.cantrelloffice.home"
$$end_record

Lync 2013 standard deployment: Exchange 2010 Sharepoint 2010 and outlook 2007 collaboration

HI
I have Exchange 2010 and sharepoint 2010 with all our user using outlook 2007. what options do I have for collaborations between these systems if I was to install Lync 2013. I have seen posts that mention that you cannot use outlook 2007 and lync 2013 and
that you would be better off installing the lync 2010 client?
1. would we be covered from a licensing point of view if we had bought lync 2013 cals but install the lync 2010 software on desktops?
2. what Cals do we require for presence to be available in SharePoint we currently have standard sharepoint cals?
3. what new features will we loose if we install 2010 lync software.
4. if our mobile users use the 2013 lync software will these be able to communicate with the 2010 users?
thanks
J

Hi,
If you use Lync 2013 client with Outlook, multiple functions will not be achieved, such as: customize Outlook meeting invitations (add logo, help URL, disclaimer, footer text), in Outlook, configure meeting option to mute attendee audio and video by default,
presence status in the Microsoft Outlook To and Cc fields, and so on. As Lync 2013 is the part of Office 2013, the best choice is using Outlook 2013.
More details:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg412817.aspx
For the CAL requirement, you can refer to following link:
Lync Licensing Guide
You can refer to the link below of “What’s new for clients in Lync Server 2013” to understand the new features for Lync 2013:
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj204933.aspx
If you use Lync 2013 mobile clients, you can communicate with 2010 users with no possible.
Best Regards,
Eason Huang
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
Eason Huang
TechNet Community Support

Lync 2013 IM (OWA) Exchange integration - Only works internally

Hi Everyone
I have followed this tutorial which details how to integrate Lync with Exchange OWA:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/13168.integrating-exchange-2013-owa-and-lync-server-2013.aspx#Acessando_o_OWA
Everything works perfectly internally, however when I browse to the external OWA website I cannot sign in with IM(inside OWA). My lync client works correctly over the internet as I can make video calls to other Lync users on my domain(application on an external
PC)
Can anyone point me in the right direction? It must be something simple as it works internally. OWA works correctly externally. I can login, send/receive emails etc. I just can't get the IM to sign in
(Edit):
Current setup:
1x Lync 2013 server which is accessible from the internet via an ARR IIS server
1x Edge server which faces the internet
1x Exchange 2013 server which is accessible from the internet via an ARR IIS server
Any help would be greatly appreciated

Hi,
Did you get any error message when integrating Lync server and OWA?
Please update to the latest version for Lync server and Exchange and test again.
Please make sure that the certificate you use on the MBX server is trusted by the Lync 2013 server and vice versa. Typically this means using certificates from a mutually trusted CA, perhaps the enterprise CA
You can troubleshooting with the help of the link below of “Troubleshooting tips for Exchange 2013 OWA IM Integration to Lync 2013”:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/jenstr/archive/2012/10/31/troubleshooting-tips-for-exchange-2013-owa-im-integration-to-lync-2013.aspx
If issue persists, you can try to use SIPStack tracing to collect reports:
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=35453
Best Regards,
Eason Huang
Eason Huang
TechNet Community Support

Disable Lync 2013 Client and Exchange 2010 Integration

Is it possible to disable integration to Exchange 2010 from a Lync 2013 client? I found a key that works for Lync 2010 by setting HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Communicator\PersonalContactStoreOverride to 1. That does not seem to do anything
to a Lync 2013 client, nor have I been able to find a solution to disable it via Registry/GPO. Some things I have found seem to indicate that key does is not used by a Lync 2013 client but that is somewhat speculation. Can someone tell me if there
is a key to disable this connectivity and disable it like what the key above does for 2010? Thank you!

Create a new-csclientpolicyentry -name "PersonalContactStoreOverride" -value "1" and assign it to a Client Policy
see Raffaele's post at: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/lync/en-US/0762e036-1f9f-43a6-bb81-686864260c9d/how-to-install-the-lync-client-through-sms-with-personal-information-manager-set-to-none?forum=ocsplanningdeployment
Please mark posts as answers/helpful if it answers your question.
Blog
Lync Validator - Used to assist in the validation and documentation of Lync Server 2013.

Lync 2013 webapp URL asking credentials when accessing from web-browser

Hi, when I tried to access Lync2013 Webapp URL , I am being asked for asked enter credentials to display options to join meetings.
screenshot attached...

Hi,
Which Website Browser did you use?
Did the issue happen only for you or for multiple users?
Please test on other computer.
Please double check anonymous access settings and conference policies, make sure “enable anonymous user access to conferences” enabled.
Best Regards,
Eason Huang
Eason Huang
TechNet Community Support

Exchange UM is always using the Global Lync Dial plan for calls.

Our multi-tenant exchange UM will have auto-attendants that will do response groups. For example an auto-attenant option may be "technical support" which will ring a technical support queue. We have found that when exchange places the call to the
workflow extension (example 123)) formatted as +11231231234;ext=123 in the workflow that Lync follows the Global dial plan only. This fails because the user dial-plan is what translates the 3 digit extension back to the full E164 format. We have not found
a way to tell the exchange UM which Lync dial-plan to use, and we cannot figure a way to use the exchange dial-plan to format in a proper E164 (number/extension) format.
We worked around the issue now by using a non-important number sequence for an extension in the exchange auto-attenant, then hard-coding each extension sequence in the Lync global dial-plan to translate it one-to-one for whatever DID;ext combo it should
map to. This cannot be the best way to do this, however.
What are your thoughts with calls from exchange to Lync on how a dialplan should be specified?

Well, this is a very interesting article. This is really not the answer to my question, but it does open a side discussion. I have absolutely no problem using a key mapping and dial extension in my Exchange UM AA. Reading this article made me re-test my
AA. I can dial an extension and I can dial a key mapping. I also can say an extension and I can say a key mapping option. I dialed in to test all 4 scenarios and they are working fine. I really should contact Matt on this to find out what scenario made him
write that blog post.
On a different topic, that is not the issue here. My question is after a key-mapping is accepted (and it is) the call is transferred to that extension in Lync. The extension maps to a response group. The response group format is in E164 with the ext= at
the end. The Dial Plan (in Lync) that is used is always Global to translate that extension. In an Enterprise environment, this is most likely not an issue. But, in a hosted environment we cannot rely on anything Global. The dial plan that should be processed
is the user dialplan.
As I mentioned, I do have this working, but I am stretching the use of the global dialplan to translate a fake extension back into the user dial-plan E164 format. For example:
Exchange UM AA has option '2' for the Help Desk. I have exchange dial extension 000.
In Lync's global dial plan I have a match for extension 000 which translates to +16786660121;ext=296
+16786660121;ext=296 then matches the response group needed for option 2.
Now, if Exchange read the user dial plan that the exchange UM should belong to (paired?) then the global dialplan and the fake 000 extension would not be needed, I could simply just dial 296 and let the user dial plan do the 3 digit to E164 translation it
is already programmed to do.

Exchange AA transfer to extension to Lync 2013

I'm having issues getting the Exchange AA to transfer to extensions when using key mapping. Basically you can say a person's name and it will transfer to their extension just fine but not with the key mapping.
We are using Exchange 2010 SP3 RU4 with Lync 2013 Hosting Pack.
I found the issue but not sure how to go about resolving it.
Lync User: [email protected]
Lync Extension: +15554443333;ext=151
Exchange Extension: 151
Dial plan in Lync 2013 will convert 3-digit numbers to: +15554443333;ext=$1 for these users
Each company has their own dial plan. This particular dial plan in Lync translates the 3-digit to the full number. The problem is the transfer from Exchange AA to Lync doesn't seem to use the user's dial plan. I also cannot put a translation on the Exchange
side to do this type of format: +15554443333;ext=$1
It looks like with the key mapping it is trying to transfer to this:
REFER-TO: <sip:151;[email protected];user=phone>
P-ASSERTED-IDENTITY: <sip:[email protected]>
But of course that doesn't exist. The SIP for this user is sip:[email protected]
I ran the Lync Debugging utility and saw this:
ms-diagnostics: 14011;reason="Called Number translated";source="LYNCFE0101.COMPSYSCLOUD.COM";RuleName="Keep All";CalledNumber="151";TranslatedNumber="151";appName="TranslationService"
Start-Line: SIP/2.0 403 Forbidden
From: <sip:[email protected];user=phone>;epid=786443AA96;tag=61bfdb74d3
To: <sip:151;[email protected];user=phone>;tag=7C193436618B4C0FD1DD5B0D9EA788A5
Call-ID: d71f8c3b-0b1e-45c5-b917-0bb71ab9e240
CSeq: 16062 INVITE
Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 10.1.15.6:50244;branch=z9hG4bKf79f7414;ms-received-port=50244;ms-received-cid=BC2600
Content-Length: 0
ms-diagnostics: 12004;reason="The user is not authorized to call the specified number or none of the
routes have a valid gateway configured.";source="LYNCFE0101.DOMAIN.COM";appName="OutboundRouting"
To: <sip:151;[email protected];user=phone>;tag=4FFA2DD9248FE7799456F95533983128
Call-ID: 92f65e8040e1453e85a09ef45bc27c18
CSeq: 16063 SERVICE
Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 10.1.15.1:61309;branch=z9hG4bK957FF7E7.C2D462B71F179899;branched=FALSE;ms-received-port=61309;ms-received-cid=AFA00
Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 10.1.15.6:50244;branch=z9hG4bK488849d7;ms-received-port=50244;ms-received-cid=BC2600
Content-Length: 0
ms-diagnostics: 1003;reason="User does not exist";destination="151;[email protected]";source="sip.domain.com"
ms-edge-proxy-message-trust: ms-source-type=EdgeProxyGenerated;ms-ep-fqdn=edge.domain.com;ms-source-verified-user=verified

Hi,
You need create a UM auto-attendant for each Lync Server dial plan with the following command:
New-umautoattendant -name <auto attendant name> -umdialplan < name of dial plan created in step 1> -PilotIdentifierList <auto attendant phone number in E.164 format> -SpeechEnabled $true -Status
Enabled
You can refer to the link of “Configure Unified Messaging on Microsoft Exchange”:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg398129.aspx
Best Regards,
Eason Huang
Eason Huang
TechNet Community Support

Lync on premises with Exchange online UM SRV record

Hi,
We have Lync 2013 on premises and we have Hybrid exchange deployment, recently we have integrated Lync on premises with Exchange online UM, we have configured subscriber access and I have done all configuration, created hosted voice mail policy, created
Subscriber access UM contact.
Problem is that if a user dials from Lync client to voice mail (Exchange online UM Subscriber Access number) the call successfully establish, if the same user is outside the organization and wants to call the Exchange online UM Subscriber
Access number from his mobile or from his home phone number the call doesn't connect, this problem is not from the same user any one from outside the organization can not call to subscriber access number from his mobile or from his landline (outside the organization
numbers)
I have done some logging on Lync Edge server and found two things:
When a user calls from Lync client to O365 UM Subscriber access the call establish successfully and when I see the call logs I am seeing the
[email protected] and SRV record for the domain.com is verified
When a user calls from outside the organization (Landline or mobile) to O365 UM subscriber access the call doesn't establish and when I see the call logs I am seeing
[email protected] and subscriber access number as
[email protected] and the error says Unable to resolve DNS SRV record for domain it.domain.com.
Please note our internal domain is it.domain.com and our external or smtp domain is domain.com
In Lync 2013 the default sip domain is also it.domain.com and additional sip domain is domain.com
Pleasae help me to resolve the issue.
If answer is helpful, please hit the green arrow on the left, or mark as answer. Salahuddin | Blogs:http://salahuddinkhatri.wordpress.com | MCITP Microsoft Lync

The issue is that your default domain is it.domain.com. I suspect that even if your Edge server is able to route this call back to Exchange online, that tenant will reject this call as it will not be able to find it.domain.com or federation SRV record associated
with it.
You will need to change your default SIP domain to your public SIP domain. If you decide to do this, please note that you will also need to review any impact on the simple URLs (and certificates if applicable).
It is also recommended to perform an export-csconfiguration command to backup the topology before making these changes.
Hope this helps.
SinghP80

Lync 2013 - EWS not deployed external

Greetings!
Is there a way how to track the reason why Lync2013 client connecting over EDGE has status of EWS not deployed?
Lync 2013 Standard FE
Lync 2013 Edge
TMG
Exchange 2010
Have followed this instructions:
http://www.b4z.co.uk/lync-2013-ews-with-forefront-tmg-2010-issues.html/comment-page-1
On the TMG rules: Outlook web access, Outlook anywhere, I have deleted /autodiscover/* and /ews/* path and created a new rule,
which is connecting to a public addresses: autodiscover.company.com and owa.company.com, and on firewall rule under authentication tab selected: No delegation but client may authenticate directly.
Created also a new listener which has: No authenticaton.
PROBLEMS:
Before doing that we had a problem that Lync2013 client connecting outside LAN got a pop-up credentials and no matter what you have typed, it didn't accept it.
Now credentials pop-up is not appearing anymore, but the status of EWS is not deployed.
And we are also having another problem because we had deleted EWS and AUTODISCOVER on Outlook Web access firewall rule and on Outlook anywhere, now Outlook clients
connecting outside LAN without VPN are unable to get OOF working.
Any hints?
bostjanc

Hi Lisa!
Thank you for your reply.
Output of the command: Get-AutodiscoverVirtualDirectory -Server FQDN | fl name,InternalURL,ExternalURL
Name : Autodiscover (Default Web Site)
InternalUrl :
https://owa2010.company.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml
ExternalUrl :
https://owa2010.company.com/autodiscover/autodiscover.xml
Domain username is: [email protected]
SIP address is: [email protected]
Output of the command Get-WebServicesVirtualDirectory -Server FQDN | fl name,InternalURL,ExternalURL
Name : EWS (Default Web Site)
InternalUrl : https://owa2010.company.com/EWS/exchange.asmx
ExternalUrl : https://owa2010.company.com/EWS/exchange.asmx
A record for autodiscover.company.com is created in EXTERNAL DNS and is pointing to a newly created Firewall rule on TMG, which has /autodiscover/* and /ews/* paths,
no authentication (it passes the authentication to Exchange 2010).
There is no SRV record in External DNS if that is important?
Lync2010 client connecting external is also having EWS shown as not deployed.
QUESTION:
QUESTION1:
I have a question regarding your statement: "Make sure you have configured the CAS Server Certificates including all SAN Names for all SMTP and SIP domains."
On TMG side I have two rules for LYNC and I want to clarify something about the certificates.
1 rule is for MEET NOW links and MOBILITY. This rule has /* path, no authentication and it leads to lyncFE ip address. This rule is for Lync reverse proxy which is
visible on external DNS as lyncproxy2010.company.com. Rule is using certificate with this SAN names:
DNS Name=lyncproxy2010.company.com
DNS Name=meet.company.com
DNS Name=lyncdiscover.company.com
DNS Name=autodiscover.company.com
DNS Name=dialin.domain.local
2nd rule on TMG is newly created Firewall rule
for solving EWS problem for Lync 2013. It has /autodiscover/* and /ews/* paths,no authentication (it passes the authentication to Exchange 2010).
This rule is pointing to public address: autodiscover.company.com and to public address owa2010.company.com. Rule is using the sam certificate as we use it in other firewall rules for Outlook web access, Outlook anywhere and ActiveSync. Certificate has this
SAN names:
DNS Name=owa2010.company.com
DNS Name=exchange.company.local
DNS Name=exchange.company.com
DNS Name=exchange
DNS Name=autodiscover.company.local
DNS Name=autodiscover.company.com
Ok, my newly rule does not have lyncproxy2010.company.com should it have? It also does
not have lyncdiscover.company.com should it have?
QUESTION2:
Is EWS internal/external url
case sensitive?
QUESTION3:
With creating a newly rule for LYNC where ews and autodiscover are not authenticated on TMG side I have also removed path's /EWS/* and /AUTODISCOVER/* on rules for Outlook anywhere on TMG. Now we have problem that free/busy status ain't working
external in Outlook clients.
Soo, fixing pop-up credentials for Lync 2013 is partly solved, because credential window ain't appearing anymore, but EWS is still shown as not deployed, on the other side we have "created" another problem with OOF Outlook external. Any hints?
with best regards,
bostjanc

Office web Apps server Lync 2013 Certificate

Hi,
I'll be installing Office web app (OWA) server with Lync 2013 std edition. External users access is disabled but federation is enabled, mean OWA will be exposed to internet as wabweb.contoso.com, the interal host name of OWA server is owa.contoso.local
Does the certificate on the on OWA server need to have owa.contoso.local and certificate principle name and wabweb.contoso.com as SAN? or only owa.contoso.local is enough?

It really depends on how you publish the server to the internet. You have some options. If you are publishing this via a reverse proxy, internally you would have a private cert with .local on it and the public name on the reverse proxy. If you are
punching a firewall hole/NAT directly to the server your best option is to use a public cert on that server directly.
That all said, personally I like to make both the internal and external farm URL the same, and use a public cert on the server (if no reverse proxy is in play). So I would actually enter the OWAS Farm as wabweb.contoso.com in topology builder, than
when creating the farm via PowerShell make that both the internal and external URL and get a certificate with a single name on it of wabweb.contoso.com.
Richard
Richard Brynteson, Lync MVP | http://masteringlync.com | http://lyncvalidator.com

SQL Mirroring Requirement (Witness server) in LYNC 2013

Hi Everyone,
We are designing a Highly Available solution of for LYNC 2013 and planning to add a witness server to the backed SQL server.
Following are my Queries.
1)For the witness server should the SQL server be dedicated to the LYNC infrastructure or it can be used to host other databases.
2)I am assuming the Witness Database should be in the same Domain?
3)What is the version of the SQL server that is supported as the Witness server, can this be the Free SQL express edition ?
Waiting for some replies :-)

1)For the witness server should the SQL server be dedicated to the LYNC infrastructure or it can be used
to host other databases.
It Can be used to host other database
2)I am assuming the Witness Database should be in the same Domain?
Yes
3)What is the version of the SQL server that is supported as the Witness server, can this be the Free SQL
express edition ?
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg398990.aspx
Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question please click "Mark As Answer" Regards Edwin Anthony Joseph

Lync 2013 mobile client can't see all fields in contact card

We have deployed Lync 2013 infra in our organization, now we observed, mobile Lync client users are not able to see other users mobile number on contact card rest all information is visible.
Is there any workaround or fix to resolve this issue. Appreciate quick help.

That's effectively by design (but a popular complaint). The workaround is to put the users who's mobile numbers you need in your Outlook contact list. There's another workaround related to setting the privacy relationship, but you have to coordinate
it with many people which is not too feasible.
Here are others upset about it:
http://ammarhasayen.com/2013/09/25/lync-2013-mobile-contact-card-not-showing-mobile-number/
Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question please click "Mark As Answer".
SWC Unified Communications

Lync 2013 dial plan & Exchange UM subscriber access number

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for