Lync dial in conference

One of the Lync user conference id expired. Not sure how this was expired and the user still has the recurrence meeting in calendar. ie the meeting does not expired, only the conference id expired.
The URL for lync meeting working. Only the conference id does not work. This is a recurrence meeting.
User does not want to cancel the meeting and resend a new meeting invite.
Also if the user reset the conference information, he might need to send all of his invote again.
Any other idea to assign the meeting id for that particular meeting.... 
- Muralidharan. Please mark as answer/useful if my contribution helps you.

Hi,
For a recurring scheduled meeting with an end date, the expiry time is the scheduled end time of the last meeting occurrence plus 14 days.
For a recurring scheduled meeting without a specified end date, the expiry time is 6 months after the last meeting activation.
I think you need reset the conference information and send the information to others again.
Best Regards,
Eason Huang
Eason Huang
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

  • When joining a Lync dial-in conference the name recording is not working for participants

    When our participants join a Lync conference via dial-in they are prompted with "After the tone please record your name then press pound." But then immediately the conference attendant says "You're now joining the meeting as an unknown participant."
    The system is not allowing time for a recording at all.
    I checked Get-CsDialinConferencingConfiguration and the output originally showed: 
    Identity                               : Global
    EntryExitAnnouncementsType             : UseNames
    EnableNameRecording                    : True
    EntryExitAnnouncementsEnabledByDefault : False
    For troubleshooting I turned off name recording to see what would happen and also changed entry announcement to tone only but there is no change what so ever. The attendant still asks for a recording and doesn't allow any time to actually record.
    Jacen

    Hi,
    Please try to change the value of "EntryExitAnnouncementsEnabledByDefault" to True. and then test again.
    Please also make sure Lync Server update to the latest version.
    Best Regards,
    Eason Huang
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]
    Eason Huang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Lync Server 2010 conference not working with Windows 8.1 and IE 10

    Hello,
    The problem is that whenever a Windows 8.1 user tries to join a Lync server 2010 conference using Internet Explorer 10 (or 11, tried that too) the user can't join the conference. If the conference is created by a Lync server 2013 user joining works fine.
    When using Lync 2010 client we get the following error in the client: "error id 87 source id 7".
    When using Lync 2013 client we end up with a blank conversation window.
    There are no traces in server log, client log or event log.
    Below is a set of use cases that may help you to understand what is the problem scenario. Each of these works or does not work with both Lync 2010 and Lync 2013 client.
    - Lync server 2010 conference, windows 7, Chrome, Firefox, IE 10 or 11 --> Works.
    - Lync server 2010 conference, windows 8.1, IE 10 or 11 --> Does not work.
    - Lync server 2010 conference, windows 8.1, Chrome or Firefox --> Works.
    - Lync server 2013 conference, windows 8.1, Chrome, Firefox, IE 10 or 11 --> Works.
    It does not help to add the meet address to IE compatibility list (Compatibility View Settings).
    If i press F12 in IE and change the document mode of the meet page to IE 9 version then i can join meetings with Windows 8.1 and IE 10. Unfortunately i cannot make that as a default setting for the meet website.
    Any ideas on how to get Lync server 2010 meetings working with Windows 8.1 and IE 10 or 11?
    IE is the company default browser. Windows 8.1 is not a default operating system but we have increasing number of Windows 8.1 computers in our environment (mainly directors).

    According to your description, it is hard to tell whether the issue is related with IE or Lync Server 2010 or both.
    Compare the log when Lync client on Window 8.1 with IE 10 or IE 11 join Lync server 2010 conferencing and Lync Server 2013 conferencing.
    Lisa Zheng
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exchange UM is always using the Global Lync Dial plan for calls.

    Our multi-tenant exchange UM will have auto-attendants that will do response groups. For example an auto-attenant option may be "technical support" which will ring a technical support queue. We have found that when exchange places the call to the
    workflow extension (example 123)) formatted as +11231231234;ext=123 in the workflow that Lync follows the Global dial plan only. This fails because the user dial-plan is what translates the 3 digit extension back to the full E164 format. We have not found
    a way to tell the exchange UM which Lync dial-plan to use, and we cannot figure a way to use the exchange dial-plan to format in a proper E164 (number/extension) format. 
    We worked around the issue now by using a non-important number sequence for an extension in the exchange auto-attenant, then hard-coding each extension sequence in the Lync  global dial-plan to translate it one-to-one for whatever DID;ext combo it should
    map to. This cannot be the best way to do this, however. 
    What are your thoughts with calls from exchange to Lync on how a dialplan should be specified?

    Well, this is a very interesting article. This is really not the answer to my question, but it does open a side discussion. I have absolutely no problem using a key mapping and dial extension in my Exchange UM AA. Reading this article made me re-test my
    AA. I can dial an extension and I can dial a key mapping. I also can say an extension and I can say a key mapping option. I dialed in to test all 4 scenarios and they are working fine. I really should contact Matt on this to find out what scenario made him
    write that blog post.
    On a different topic, that is not the issue here. My question is after a key-mapping is accepted (and it is) the call is transferred to that extension in Lync. The extension maps to a response group. The response group format is in E164 with the ext= at
    the end. The Dial Plan (in Lync) that is used is always Global to translate that extension. In an Enterprise environment, this is most likely not an issue. But, in a hosted environment we cannot rely on anything Global. The dial plan that should be processed
    is the user dialplan. 
    As I mentioned, I do have this working, but I am stretching the use of the global dialplan to translate a fake extension back into the user dial-plan E164 format. For example:
    Exchange UM AA has option '2' for the Help Desk. I have exchange dial extension 000.
    In Lync's global dial plan I have a match for extension 000 which translates to +16786660121;ext=296
    +16786660121;ext=296 then matches the response group needed for option 2.
    Now, if Exchange read the user dial plan that the exchange UM should belong to (paired?) then the global dialplan and the fake 000 extension would not be needed, I could simply just dial 296 and let the user dial plan do the 3 digit to E164 translation it
    is already programmed to do.
     

  • Dial-in conference disconnecting

    Hi
    we got complaints from 2 different users. they scheduled online meeting and when a participants try to join from phone, it getting joined and after some secs its giving the below message and the call disconnected.
    "sorry i am having trouble accessing the system right now. please try again later. good bye"
    As of now we got two similar complaints. both are different meetings.
    when the participants join using Lync audio from their PC, its working. problem is only when they join from phone.
    so we took mediation server log and we found the below
    (00000000029BF36F)$$START-MEDIATIONSERVER
    MediationCall: fd9e80ce97804724b892d6b462027b56
    CallId: 249db383-b1fe-4f98-b076-01c2d52259bf
    From: sip:4155;[email protected];user=phone
    To: sip:[email protected];user=phone
    Direction: Inbound
    Start-Line: ProxyCall SignalingState is disconnected, reason is: TerminatedRemotely
    $$END-MEDIATIONSERVER
    (0000000003596D53)$$START-MEDIATIONSERVER
    MediationCall: fd9e80ce97804724b892d6b462027b56
    CallId: 0be7f92b5fde3138c3504331f000
    From: sip:[email protected]
    To: sip:[email protected]
    Direction: Inbound
    Start-Line: GatewayMedia's InnerDispose was called with shutdown = True.
    $$END-MEDIATIONSERVER
    (00000000029BF36F)$$START-MEDIATIONSERVER
    MediationCall: fd9e80ce97804724b892d6b462027b56
    CallId: 249db383-b1fe-4f98-b076-01c2d52259bf
    From: sip:4155;[email protected];user=phone
    To: sip:[email protected];user=phone
    Direction: Inbound
    Start-Line: Terminating Proxy side call with session state: Disconnected, sip-response: 200, ms-diag: 4294967295, ms-diag reason: NULL.
    $$END-MEDIATIONSERVER
    i compared the logs with working and non-working meeting and i found that, in the non-working meeting after "MediaSessionAgent.set_connectivityEstablished" action "proxycall.onproxystatechanged" event is occuring
    but in working meeting scenario after "MediaSessionAgent.set_connectivityEstablished" action "Mediationcall.constructor" action is occurring.
    in both of the scenario the session went via my Lync edge server.
    Please help
    Regards
    Megar
    Regards Mager

    Did you join the conferencing from Lync phone?
    Please check if you can join the conferencing from a mobile phone number.
    Please check if you can dial the phone number from the conference.
    Collect some log files on Lync Edge Server and Front End Server.
    Lisa Zheng
    TechNet Community Support

  • Dial In Conference Bridge

    Hello all. We have CCM 4.1(3)sr1 and Unity. We currently have a pub and a sub and have each configured as a software conference bridge for meetme's and adhoc's. Is it possible with this equipment to set up a permanent conference bridge that we can map and external DID that we can give to users to join a repeating weekly conference? If not, what is needed to make this happen, or can you direct me to the docs to find out? Thanks
    Brian

    Meetme number can be configured as its DID number itself (9725425900 for callers calling from outside. Telco sends 5900 to your PRI, 5900 is a meetme number)
    or
    you can create a Translation pattern which maps to a Meetme number. The Translation pattern could be a DID number. So your meet me number in this case will be a non-DID number say 5800. You create a translation pattern 5900 (which is a DID number) and translate that to 5800.
    The conference host should dial 5900 at the right time of the conference so that people calling in will be added to the bridge.
    HTH
    Sankar.
    PS: please remember to rate posts!

  • Is it possible to Archive all Lync IM and Conference direct to a 3rd party archive?

    From what I gather, IM messages and Conferences can be sent to a Lync Archive. From there a shell script to export to .eml is possible.
    But is it possible to Journal direct from Lync, upon conversation or conference completion - or after a set time period - a transcript as an email to any 3rd party location [say, a 3rd party archive system]?  Exchange does this
    very well indeed.  So it would be most useful if Lync did too.
    Any Video and Voice recording Files should either be included as attachments to the transcript
    or as URL type links to the files in the Lync store. 
    Given the limitations of the Lync Archive (no search etc. plus the extra setup and sql license) this alternative approach seems very sensible.
    And if there are no built-in methods to do this, then is it technically possible to achieve with some .Net skills?
    Merlin Beedell

    Ah Yes, thank you - I can see the Folder in my Outlook - "Conversation History".  The items are of type IPM.Note.Microsoft.Conversation.
    It does reference file transfers in the conversation:
    [11:40]
    You asked to send "188836.mht" to RTuveri.
    [11:40]
    "188836.mht" was transferred.
    [11:40]
    persleff.txtwas saved to C:\Users\mbeedell\Documents\My Received Files. It's a good idea to scan the file for viruses
    before you open it.
    But when a voice/video call is made, it does not include much detail (duration or url link to the saved transcript):
    Merlin Beedell
    [11:42]:
    Am
    trying
    the
    video
    conference!
    [11:42]
    Connected to RTuveri ([email protected]).
    Renato Tuveri
    [11:42]:
    can
    you
    see
    me?
    So better - but from a compliance point of view, this may be an incomplete record.  Is it possible to improve on this?
    Next - to see what format of address information is recorded when connecting with non-Active-Directory [external / anonymous] users.
    Merlin Beedell

  • Lync Hybrid Deployment and Dial-in Conferencing

    I know this question could fall under community.office365.com forum, but didn't get any response there...
    I'm looking at a possible Lync Hybrid deployment. All users will be hosted in the cloud, but we're looking at hybrid on-prem Lync deployment so we can connect a trunk from our IP PBX and use the on-prem server for Lync dial-in conferencing. We have a separate
    phone system and users will use those phones to simply dial in to the Lync dial-in conference bridge for audio conferencing meetings.
    Is this even possible with Hybrid deployment?
    Thanks in advance!
    me

    Lync online doesn't support Hybrid Voice, please check out: http://pei.com/2014/03/lync-hybrid-deployments-with-enterprise-voice/
    Brian Riggs has a great post about Lync Online supporting voice posted today: http://www.nojitter.com/post/240167129/lync-online-enterprise-voice-out-pstn-calling-in
    Please mark posts as answers/helpful if it answers your question.
    Blog
    Lync Validator - Used to assist in the validation and documentation of Lync Server 2013.

  • Enterprise Voice and Lync Meeting Outlook Add-In, Dial in Numbers

    I ran across something that I was unaware of and wanted to double check here. 
    Background:  I am running a two pool Lync 2013 Enterprise Deployment with an OCS pool being phased out.  All users are migrated to Lync backend using the OCS client but our conferencing numbers still exist on the OCS deployment.
    As man know, when you upgrade to the Lync client, it removes the Outlook add-in for conferencing and places a single button for scheduling conference calls and meetings.  Ideally, depending on the pool the user is on, the information that is populated
    in the meeting request comes from the pool they are assigned to. 
    I have found that without enabling Enterprise Voice and setting the voice policy to Automatic, Outlook will still use the OCS numbers in the meeting request.  Once I enable EV for a user and set the VP to Auto, they receive the correct numbers based
    on pool registrar. 
    I am still currently searching but what I would like is confirmation that I do need to enable Enterprise Voice with Voice Policy set to automatic to have Outlook obtain the correct numbers for the pool any user is registered to.

    I don’t believe the enable Enterprise Voice and assigning a dial plan can change the behavior of the Outlook add-in.
    The process is like this:
    The conference organizer uses Microsoft® Outlook® to schedule a conference, and then Outlook communicates with Microsoft Lync Server 2010 by using an Outlook add-in that is included as part of the Microsoft® Lync™ 2010 installation. Outlook
    uses the information supplied by the server to create a new invitation, which includes a conference URL for attendees who are joining the conference by using one of the supported Lync clients, and telephone numbers and a conference ID for attendees who are
    joining by phone. 
    When you mentioned OCS numbers, did you refer to Lync dial-in access number or conference ID?
    Lisa Zheng
    TechNet Community Support

  • Delayed Number Entry - Iphone Dialing Conference number and then passcode?

    How do I use the Iphone to dial a conference number when you need to wait to enter the passcode - I want to set up these frequently dialed conference numbers as contacts and have the iphone automatically enter the number, wait, and then enter the passcode.
    Thanks - Elyse

    enter the number in your contacts in this format:
    (555)555-1234 ,555
    The space and the comma inserts a pause before the next numbers dial.
    (note: I have had problems getting this to work when on the speaker phone, the second numbers dont go thru, off of speaker it works fine)

  • Polycom Group Series video resolutions in Lync conference

    I've noticed that two Polycom Group series devices that have the Lync Interop licence installed provide good quality (1080p) video calls when making a point to point lync call but if the same two devices connect by joining a Lync conference, by
    joining via a calendar appointment for example, the resolution drops to 640x368
    I documented my findings in a quick blog
    http://1plex.co.uk/polycom-group-series-testing-lync-2013/
    anyone been successful getting the devices to connect at a better resolution?

    Thanks Thamara, thats a great shout, I did look at this but didn't think it was relevant as I found this definition of the parameter below - maybe the issue is that the Group Series don't get classified as 'Lync Server 2013 clients' and it treats them
    as legacy clients. I'll look into it a bit further - thanks again
    MaxVideoConferencingResolution   This parameter is no longer used for Lync Server 2013 clients in Lync Server 2013 conferences. Lync Server 2013 conferences use the bit rate controls described earlier in this section. This
    setting is still used for legacy clients joining a Lync Server 2013 conference. This parameter determines the maximum resolution allowed for legacy clients in conferences organized by users who are homed on Lync Server 2013. That is, legacy clients are treated
    the same as they were in previous versions of Lync Server or Office Communications Server

  • DTMF Digits Dialing issue on 8831 Conference Phone

    Hi,
    anyone had a DTMF digits dialing issue on Cisco 8831 conference phone. If I have to join any external conference bridge, when I trying dial my user id and  password its not sending the digit i am dialing. Conference bridge is saying wrong PIN dialed.Please suggest

    Hi
    Actually this problem was on SIP call,User was dialing shortcode and it was going through their SIP trunk, raised case with TAC and they replied "its expected behavior and documented in the release guides, we do not find any defects filed to fix this. we are hoping, this behavioral change would be included in the future releases"
    version of call manager  9.1.2.11900-12
    current firmware running on the phone-SIP 9.3.3.5

  • Lync 2010 Mediation Server Static Route

    Has anyone used this method for allowing NON enterprise voice users the ability to utilize the conference call back feature?
    http://www.confusedamused.com/notebook/lync-dial-in-conferencing-static-route-configuration/
    If so, can you answer these questions?  We have deployed this successfully but with a few hiccups.
    When a non enterprise voice user uses the conference call back feature, the lync dial plans are ignored but the number is sent with a +1 in front of it.  Is there a way for the CUCM to strip off that +1 and add a 9 to it?  Whats the best way to accomplish this?
    When the conference does call them back, the caller ID displays their Lync number.  We would rather it display a different number.  Is this possible?  How could we accomplish this on the CUCM?
    Thanks!

    You can modify the trunk configuration using Lync Server 2013 Control Panel which were created using Lync Server 2010 Control Panel.
    You can set different Pool Trunks, defining the different features for each trunk.
    Lisa Zheng
    TechNet Community Support

  • Lync 2013 Intergration with Siemens HiPath 4000 and HiPath 3500

    Dear All,
    We have implemented Lync 2013 with 2 FE , 1 PChat , 1 OWA and 2 Edge Server (DNS Load Balancing with NAT) , we are now in the next phase where we need to provide complete voice integration,
    The customer is currently using Siemens HiPath 4000 at main office and Siemens HiPath 3800 and HiPath 3500 at the Branch offices,
    Our scope is as under,
    1) As first part intergrade the we have to integrate it with Siemens HiPath 4000 , with below features,
    a) Lync User ability to dial via the PRI Lines
    b) Lync User to receive Calls made to their  Siemens extension on Lync Client ( Simultaneous ringing or enabling mobility (Similar to Cisco Mobility- When DID calls come they ring both on physical phone and Lync Client)
    c) Features Such as Call forwarding , Hunt Groups , Integrated Exchange 2010 UM support ,  
    Finally Since we need to phase out Siemens we  would have SBC 2000 gateway
    We have 5 PRI lines going to Siemens HiPath , post this we would transfer one of the lesser used PRI to SBC 2000 , while maintaining complete functionality,
    A similar setup would also be done at the Branch Office , except that we would be having SBC 1000 at one of the branch offices and Sangoma Lync Express at the other Branch Offices,
    What we need ,
    1) Design related suggestions
    2) Implementation related challenges and hurdles
    3) Dos and Donts , we do not want to over commit the client and then regret,
    4) Any kind of Guide and similar scenarios implemented by other , step by step documents,
    5) Best Practices , limitations and things to avoid, Suggestions
    Thanks and Regards,
    Hasan Reza

    Dear All ,
    I am sure all you guys who have advised me are much more experienced and have a better understanding of Voice,
    I would like to rest my solution based on below design , before I submit the same to the customer, Need one final check list , Pls advise / confirm ,
    Also please help me with the pre-requisites that  I need to go to client with ? If there is something missing pls highlight
    Looking at the changed design ,
    Here is call flow
    1) Calls comes via ---> PRI to Siemens HiPath
    2) Hipath locally routes the call if the Extension is present in the Local System
    3) If not then call is sent to Sip Trunk that would be accepted by the Sonus 2000
    4) Sonus would then forward to the call to Lync 2013
    5) Lync 2013 establishes the call with Lync Client
    In this scenario , what would be the impact on below
    0) Can we have same series of extension , for example (4001, 4002 , 4003 on traditional PABX , and have 4101,4102,4103 on Lync 2013)
    1) Conference calls between Lync and Traditional PABX Systems
    2) Currently all the Extension are configured with DID nos , any out going calls has the users DID no , after a user is moved to Lync 2013 , then the DID number associated with user , how would that behave ?
    3) Can from a  I transfer a user and his/her PRI to Sonus, or I should transfer the entire PRI Bunch,
    4) Will there be an impact on caller ID , MOH (Music on Hold) , Hunt groups,
    5) Will the same concept be used for Branch Offices as well ?
     Please pardon my queries but if the above are made clear I am sure many people would benefit from this blog.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Hasan Reza

  • Lync 2010 Recurring meetings don't work post-migration when 2010 server is shut down

    I've got an interesting issue here. I completed my Lync Server 2010 -> 2013 migration about 6 months ago, and everything has been going fine as far as I can tell. I left one of the servers up and running in the 2010 pool for a while. I finally decided
    it was time to fully decommission Lync Server 2010, so I shut down my 2010 server. I did not delete from the topology just yet, in case something bad happened. Well, when I shut it down, I got reports from some users that they couldn't get into their Lync
    Meetings.
    The only conclusion I have been able to draw is that this happens for recurring meetings that were scheduled before the Lync Server 2013 migration. It seems that those meetings did not get migrated with the users. Does anyone have any guidance for this situation?
    I'm guessing there's no way to actually move the meetings. At best, I'd like to simply be able to identify users who are in this situation and have them reschedule their meetings. I think there are few enough of them that we can handle that.

    That's seems odd per:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj688011.aspx 
    What is the user experience?
    Have you followed all the decommission steps? Have you tried Move-CsConferenceDirectory:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg412968.aspx
    "When you create a dial-in conferencing Uniform Resource Identifier (URI), those URIs are assigned unique SIP addresses. However, SIP addresses are difficult to translate to devices that are not SIP-aware; for example, a public switched telephone network
    (PSTN) telephone can’t translate a SIP address. Because of that, Lync Server uses conference directories as a way to help these devices locate, and connect to, dial-in conferences. This is done by creating a SIP conference directory that is associated with
    each dial-in conferencing URI, and is identified by an integer value rather than a SIP URI. PSTN telephones and other devices can then use these numbers instead of a SIP URI when connecting to conferences; the directory number is included in the PSTN conference
    identification users enter when connecting to a dial-in conference.
    Occasionally, you might need to move a conference directory from one pool to another; for example, if you decommission a pool you might need to move your existing conference directories to a new location. The
    Move-CsConferenceDirectory cmdlet enables you to move conference directories to a different pool."
    Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question please click "Mark As Answer".
    SWC Unified Communications

Maybe you are looking for