Mac Pro not auto-negotiating link speed correctly

We have found that none of our Mac Pros are auto-negotiating their network link speed correctly while running 10.4.10. This happens while booted into the production OS as well as netbooted to a 10.4.10 NetBoot image. The network card can be forced to negotiate at higher speeds either through the command-line or System Preferences but it will not do it on its own. We have gigabit to every desktop and imaging at the default 10 Mbit is horrible! Any help would be appreciated!

There is a kext that is the culprit:
/System/Library/Extensions/IONetworkingFamily.kext/Contents/PlugIns/AppleIntel82 54XEthernet.kext
In 10.4.9 it's version is 1.1.7a3, in 10.4.10 it is 1.1.8a2, in 10.4.11 it is 1.1.8a6
That doesn't matter much really, but that's the details.
1. Get the 10.4.9 Intel Combo Updater
2. Get OpenUp or Pacifist
3. Open the DMG
4. Show contents on the PKG
5. Copy out the pax.gz file to the desktop
6. un-Gzip the pax, and open that up (with Pacifist or OpenUp)
7. Get the old kext
8. Copy it into your /System/Library/Extentions
Now, the permission on the kext need to be changed to root:wheel or if you in Finder system:wheel
Also, you should either delete the kernel caches or:
sudo touch /System/Library/Extensions
this changes the date stamp on the directory and OS X will recreate the kernel caches...
And yes, the 10.4.11 seed update corrects this.
Also bonus Log files! These have been "prettied up" for readability, but you'll see, 10.4.10's driver is just spitting out Zer0s so the network switch/hub has no choice but to say "O K... I ' l l s p e a k s l o w e r t h e n..."
10.4.9:
Auto-Neg Advertise Reg (04d) = 0xde1,
Link Partner Ability Reg (05d) = 0xc5e1,
Gig Advertise Reg (09d) = 0xe00,
Gig Link Partner Ability Reg (10d) = 0x7800
10.4.10:
Auto-Neg Advertise Reg (04d) = 0xde1,
Link Partner Ability Reg (05d) = 0x0,
Gig Advertise Reg (09d) = 0xe00,
Gig Link Partner Ability Reg (10d) = 0x0
(Much Prettier)
10.4.11(seed):
Auto-Negotiation Advertisement Register (04d) = 0xde1
Auto-Negotiation Link Partner Ability Register (05d) = 0xc5e1
Auto-Negotiation Gigabit Advertisement Register (09d) = 0xe00
Auto-Negotiation Gigabit Link Partner Ability Register (10d) = 0x7800
PHY Specific Status Register (17d) = 0xaf48
If this info from 10.4.11 is NDA well bite me, I think people should know it'll be fixed in the future, right?

Similar Messages

  • Negotiated Link Speed on MacBook Pro mid-2009 with Kingston SSDNow v300

    Hi,
    I have a mid-2009 MacBook Pro (13") with Kingston SSDNow v300 SSD drive with Mavericks OS X installed.
    I've noticed from different forums that many users have the same problem that I have: SSD drive's Negotiated Link Speed is only 1,5 Gbps, although MacBook Pro mid-2009 should support 3 Gbps speed.
    My system has EFI 1.7 firmware update (MBP55.00AC.B03) installed in and System Info says that 3 Gbps Link Speed should be possible:
    NVidia MCP79 AHCI:
      Vendor:    NVidia
      Product:    MCP79 AHCI
      Link Speed:    3 Gigabit
      Negotiated Link Speed:    1.5 Gigabit
      Physical Interconnect:    SATA
      Description:    AHCI Version 1.20 Supported
    Many users have tried to reset NVRAM and SMC and I have also done these steps, but with not any improvement.
    Some users have mentioned that MacBook Pro mid-2009 has a poor SATA ACHI chipset (NVidia MCP79) and SATA III SSD drives won't work on SATA II speed unless SSD drive is forced to work on SATA II speed by firmware update or by some tweaking tool. Is there this kind of tool available for Kingston SSDNow v300?
    One user says that he got 3 Gbps Negotiated Link Speed on Mountain Lion, but after installing Mavericks, speed dropped to 1,5 Gbps (https://discussions.apple.com/message/23549859#23549859).
    So, is there any way to get Negotiated Link Speed to work on 3 Gbps on Kingston SSDNow v300 with MacBook Pro mid-2009 (for example by installing an older version of Mac OS X) or do I have to buy a new SSD drive from another manufacturer to get 3 Gbps Negotiated Link Speed to work on my machine?
    If the last option (to buy a new SSD drive) is the only option, would it be wise to look for an older model, a SATA II drive, (maybe OCZ Vertex 2) to get 3 Gbps speed?
    Thanks!

    Hi
    I was just as frustated as you after installing the Kingston v300.  I mean it's a solidly built drive with the reliability of kingston (I've been using their RAM for years and years in my desktop PC without problems).  Unfortunately, for a the last 3 months I had it in my 2009 unibody white macbook, it was stuck at link speed 1.5.
    I've been searching in forums since then without any solution.  Even the update for bios is not available for my model.
    I just tried the SMC reset after reading the blog.
    http://thenextweb.com/lifehacks/2010/12/04/how-when-why-to-reset-the-pram-smc-on -your-mac/#!w3XEY
    On reboot, everything seemed faster, so I checked the negotiated link speed and it was at 3 instead of 1.5!  Yay!  Then I checked the disk transfer speed on Blackmagic Disk speed test and it roughly doubled from 138 to 260MB/s.  Now, I'm not going to shutdown or restart...
    I hope this post is useful for people like me stuck at 1.5 Gbps speed.  Good luck

  • "Negotiated Link Speed" question to make informed decision on upgrading my hard drive

    This is my first post on any help forum I've made in a while as I have usually found answers if I looked hard enough. I am glad I caught and investigated this detail before buying anything that may not improve. What I really want to do is top my macbook out. I'll try to provide as much useful info I can and appreciate what clear insight anyone has for me.
    While comparing the specs of my current hard-drive to the SSD ones, I couldn't help but notice these line items:
      Link Speed:    3 Gigabit
      Negotiated Link Speed:    1.5 Gigabit
    While I spent a great deal of time researching similar concerns I could not find the answers that I needed, or made any sense. I'm going to include the hardware specs of my system to make this easier for anyone who is more knowledgeable about what is causing the 1.5 limit. My current stock hard drive is a Seagate Momentus 5400.6 SATA.
    Serial-ATA:
    NVidia MCP79 AHCI:
      Vendor:    NVidia
      Product:    MCP79 AHCI
    * Link Speed:    3 Gigabit
    * Negotiated Link Speed:    1.5 Gigabit
      Description:    AHCI Version 1.20 Supported
    Hardware Overview:
      Model Name:    MacBook Pro
      Model Identifier:    MacBookPro5,4
      Processor Name:    Intel Core 2 Duo
      Processor Speed:    2.53 GHz
      Number of Processors:    1
      Total Number of Cores:    2
      L2 Cache:    3 MB
      Memory:    8 GB
      Bus Speed:    1.07 GHz
      Boot ROM Version:    MBP53.00AC.B03
      SMC Version (system):    1.49f2
    All I am looking to do is top out my system hardware wise. I already maxed the RAM and was interested in getting an SSD. Before I do....I need to know why the 'negotiated link speed' is not reading 3gb as well, and if it's something I can correct. If I upgrade to a 6gb SSL and the value still reads 1.5 I'll have wasted my money. Thanks all.

    I looked in as many sources as I could find, and didn't see any 'published' link speed for my macbook. I am led to believe that it is 3gb based on the system report. Since my 5400rpm drive cannot physically achieve much less than 1gbs, if what your saying is true (which is sounds to me that you know what you're talking about).
    With this understanding, even if a 7200rpm drive can't saturated the 1.5gb, and even if my Macbook data *may* not be able to exceed 3, would it be logical to say that an SSD would gives me 3x the speed if I upgrade? I'm just looking to get the most out of my computer with the current processor and the 8gb of RAM. If it makes the music software, opening/closing programs, reboot, start-up, shutdown and things like that more noticeably 'snappier'. I can be comfortable with the investment.
    "The bottleneck is the drive's best-case transfer rate."
    I would like to know how to go about determining this. I also need to know if I have to limit my choices to an SSD based on the recommended upgrades for my specific computer:
    http://eshop.macsales.com/MyOWC/Upgrades.cfm?&model=353&type=Internal+Drive&sort =pop
    or if I can get a discounted one such as this:
    http://www.microcenter.com/single_product_results.phtml?product_id=0364781
    Speed and compatibility. Before I upgraded to this macbook from my PC, I was chasing incompatibility issues all over the place and got to spend less than 10% of my time actually working on music/video production. If only I had know then what I know now….but that's why I gotta do my homework before buying everything these days

  • Which Mac Pro? More cores=slower speeds? And most of us know the speed matters or FPU for music and I don't understand the faster is for the least amount of procs. And while I get the whole rendering thing and why it makes sense.

    Which Mac Pro? More cores=slower speeds? And most of us know the speed matters or FPU for music and I don't understand the faster is for the least amount of procs. And while I get the whole rendering thing and why it makes sense.
    The above is what the bar says. It's been a while and wondered, maybe Apple changed the format for forums. Then got this nice big blank canvas to air my concerns. Went to school for Computer Science, BSEE, even worked at Analog Devices in Newton Massachusetts, where they make something for apple. 
    The bottom line is fast CPU = more FPU = more headroom and still can't figure out why the more cores= the slower it gets unless it's to get us in to a 6 core then come out with faster cores down the road or a newer Mac that uses the GPU. Also. Few. I'm the guy who said a few years ago Mac has an FCP that looks like iMovie on Steroids. Having said that I called the campus one day to ask them something and while I used to work for Apple, I think she thought I still did as she asked me, "HOW ARE THE 32 CORES/1DYE COMING ALONG? Not wanting to embarrass her I said fine, fine and then hung up.  Makes the most sense as I never quite got the 2,6,12 cores when for years everything from memory to CPU's have been, in sets of 2 to the 2nd power.  2,4,8,16,32,64,120,256,512, 1024, 2048,4196,8192, 72,768.  Wow. W-O-W and will be using whatever I get with Apollo Quad. 
    Peace to all and hope someone can point us in THE RIGHT DIRECTION.  THANK YOU

    Thanks for your reply via email/msg. He wrote:
    If you are interested in the actual design data for the Xeon processor, go to the Intel site and the actual CPU part numbers are:
    Xeon 4 core - E5.1620v2
    Xeon 6 core - E5.1650v2
    Xeon 8 core - E5.1680v2
    Xeon 12 core - E5.2697v2
    I read that the CPU is easy to swap out but am sure something goes wrong at a certain point - even if solderedon they make material to absorb the solder, making your work area VERY clean.
    My Question now is this, get an 8 core, then replace with 2 3.7 QUAD CHIPS, what would happen?
    I also noticed that the 8 core Mac Pro is 3.0 when in fact they do have a 3.4 8 core chip, so 2 =16? Or if correct, wouldn't you be able to replace a QUAD CHIP WITH THAT?  I;M SURE THEY ARE UO TO SOMETHING AS 1) WE HAVE SEEN NO AUDIO FPU OR PERHAPS I SHOULD CHECK OUT PC MAKERS WINDOWS machines for Sisoft Sandra "B-E-N-C-H-M-A-R-K-S" -
    SOMETHINGS UP AND AM SURE WE'LL ALL BE PLEASED, AS the mac pro      was announced Last year, barely made the December mark, then pushed to January, then February and now April.
    Would rather wait and have it done correct than released to early only to have it benchmarked in audio and found to be slower in a few areas- - - the logical part of my brain is wondering what else I would have to swap out as I am sure it would run, and fine for a while, then, poof....
    PEACE===AM SURE APPLE WILL BLOW US AWAY - they have to figure out how to increase the power for 150 watts or make the GPU work which in regard to FPU, I thought was NVIDIA?

  • Mac Pro not sending video to my DV Camera

    Hi,
    I have been editing on a PowerMac G5 using FCP 5.1.4 and outputting to tape on my Sony TRV900 MiniDV camera with no problems for over a year.
    I have recently bought a Mac Pro, and although I can get footage OFF to camera, the Mac Pro appears not to be sending out any video out through firewire to the camera.
    I re-hooked up my G5 and everything works perfectly there - so I guess this rules out the camera or the cable.
    View menu > External Video is set to All Frames
    Audio/Video Settings, video playback is set to Apple Firewire PAL
    I have had both systems side by side and made sure EVERY preference is identical - the only difference is the computer!
    I have unplugged every other device so that the camera is the only firewire (or USB) device attached to the computer, and have tried both FW400 ports.
    I really don't want to have to lug my heavy computer to an Apple Store for them to look at it...
    Has anyone got any clever ideas?
    Thanks in advance.
    Dom

    Well - I've solved the problem.
    It seems the Mac Pro firewire bus cant send the correct signal out to my DVCam.
    I bought a Sonnet Tango Express PCIe card, it has 2 FW400 ports and 3 USB2 ports, when my DVCam is plugged into this new FW bus, everything works.
    I don't know whether this problem is down to MY Mac Pro, or whether all mac Pros will have the same problem. Either way, it seems a bit wrong for Apple to sell a flagship product, ideal for editing, and not have the FW bus work properly.
    I now have a working computer, and it's big hassle to cart it off to an Apple store, so I think I'll leave the issue here and not pursue it with Apple.
    Dom

  • Screen dims randomly with Mac Pro - NOT a Macbook

    After upgrading to Mountain Lion, my screen will dim randomly when watching movies or YouTube.  This is on my early 2008 Mac Pro - not a Macbook Pro which seems to have this problem commonly.  I've searched and searched and lots of people have this problem with a Macbook Pro (battery saving feature or something) but there are no options to defeat screen dimming that I can find for a Mac Pro!! Mountain Lion just keeps getting worse and worse!
    HelP!

    Hello, thanks for taking the time to help me out!
    This is a 2008 MacPro (2x2.8 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon) running Mountain Lion OSX 10.8.4.
    I am running two monitors: a HannsG HH281 and a Hewlett PAckard HP w2408h.
    When this first was happening back in March 2013, I thought it had something to do with the ambient light sensor on the HP (the HannG doesnt have a light sensor), but it also might have has something to do with the dynamic contrast on the HannsG.  I had shut those features off, and I actually hadn't had this problem in a while and there has been a few Mountain Lion updates since then.
    I just tried to reproduce this by turning on/off the dynamic contrast on the Hanns G - did not get the problem
    again.  I also just turned the ambient light sensor on for the HP, and again, the problem did not occur.
    So it is hard to say if the problem is gone away or not or if it just is not showing itself at the time being?
    Here is the graphics card and display info from the System Profiler:
    ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT:
      Chipset Model:          ATI Radeon HD 2600
      Type:          GPU
      Bus:          PCIe
      Slot:          Slot-1
      PCIe Lane Width:          x16
      VRAM (Total):          256 MB
      Vendor:          ATI (0x1002)
      Device ID:          0x9588
      Revision ID:          0x0000
      ROM Revision:          113-B1480A-252
      EFI Driver Version:          01.00.252
      Displays:
    HH281:
      Resolution:          1920 x 1200 @ 60 Hz
      Pixel Depth:          32-Bit Color (ARGB8888)
      Display Serial Number:          939LK3NA01178
      Main Display:          Yes
      Mirror:          Off
      Online:          Yes
      Rotation:          Supported
      Television:          Yes
    HP w2408:
      Resolution:          1920 x 1200 @ 60 Hz
      Pixel Depth:          32-Bit Color (ARGB8888)
      Display Serial Number:          3CQ8410GZF 
      Mirror:          Off
      Online:          Yes
      Rotation:          Supported
      Television:          Yes

  • Why would I get a Sudden Motion Sensor error on a Mac Pro (not a laptop)??

    Get this error all the time since upgrading to Logic 9.1.4.  Thing is, I have a Mac Pro, not a laptop.
    Apple sends me to this page:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1934
    Should I disable sudden motion sensor?  Seems silly.  I am recording woth headphones, there's no movement from the computer.   And again, didn't have this error for 3 years and suddenly I get it after upgrading to 9.1.4?

    9.1.4 seems a bit shaky...
    That said, you might try disabling "Sleep" for the drive.
    As I recall, it's a generic error meaning the computer either isn't getting a response from the drive or that it can't pull data off fast enough.
    pancenter-

  • [URGENT] Mac Pro not booting, Fan error but fans are working.

    Hello,
    My server G5 is stuck on grey screen with spinning wheel. I ran the AHT and got the following:
    2FAN/4/8: CPU A INTAKE
    All the fans are spinning. I would really really appreciate if I can get any help or advice. I tried searching for this AHT error but could not find anything solid.
    This is our main server and its crucial to our organization and I am sweating bullets here.
    I reseted memory and unplugged all RAID drives. The three LED on the Logic board are Red, Yellow and Green; Power On, Trickle and Open Firmware respectively.
    Thanks for any help.

    Just to say that usually it helps to include the make/model of RAID controllers, whether it is hardware RAID or not. The Mac Pro Apple RAID card IS a PITA and is particular sometimes about drives and its battery reconditioning as well as mounting drives and time to create a hardware RAID5.
    When a drive causes trouble it is often though not always because of directory being damaged and OS X can't even inspect to see if there is a system or if it can be mounted.
    And because the G5 normally only has two SATA drives, to use three requires a bracket or something else to add drives, like Sonnet G5 Jive. And then a PCI SATA controller with internal ports. But that is just your average SATA controller.
    If it was a Mac Pro the thread could and should have been moved to another forum. And you still refer to this as a Mac Pro, not PowerMac. Which leads me to wonder.
    Molex y-splitters as needed in a G5 but three yrs for a set of drives, I'd say they were due for backup + erase/initialize and restore. Hopefully you kept them in shape with Disk Warrior during that time (don't rely on just Apple First Aid to maintain and repair/rebuild directories).

  • 4core, mid-'07 Mac Pro not negotiating w/ D-link gigabit switch

    I've just bought a D-Link DGS-2205 gigabit ethernet switch. It autonegotiates a gigabit connection with the Windows machine in my house perfectly. With the Mac Pro, however, it just sputters. The autonegotiate eventually leaves the Mac on a 10 Mbps connection. Has anyone else had a problem between their Mac Pros and D-Link gigabit switches? Or at least with the DGS-2205 model?

    Same hardware same problem.
    I need to reboot the Mac Pro in order to get a gigabit connection.
    With the Mac Mini and my old HP P4, no problem.
    Seems like a hardware incompatibility.
    On the other side the D link 2205 is really cheap compared to other gigabit switches.
    No all my stuff is connected in gigabit to my Linksys WRT350, including the Mac Pro.
    I only use the D link 2205 as a "portable switch", because there are always meeting rooms or customer's project room where there are not enough ports for all participants.

  • Mac Pro not reporting memory amount correctly - please help

    Hi all,
    I have recently purchased an additonal 2 x 4GB Crucial DDR2 FB-DIMM 667Mhz sticks for my Mac Pro Dual Core Intel Xeon 2 x 2.66GHz computer.  I have installed these correctly to Riser A 3+4 alongside 2 x 512MB Kingston sticks in Riser A 1+2, and 2 x 2GB Kingston sticks in Riser B 1+2.
    I am seeing now that instead of the 13GB I should have showing in system profiler (which I initially saw after installation of the Crucial sticks), I am seeing 11GB.  The two 2GB Kingston sticks are both showing incorrectly as 1GB.
    Can anyone help with regards what I should do to check if it's a Riser problem or the two sticks, etc...  I've ran a memory scan with TechTool Pro 5 and that came back fine, though for 11GB Ram and not the actual 13GB I should have/see.
    I'm going to call Crucial and my local retailer tomorrow where I got the Kingston Ram pre-installed on purchase of the Mac, and that Kingston has a life-time warrenty anyway, but still I'd like to try and resolve this and look into the issue further myself too.
    Please can someone kindly advise me what steps to take, I'd really appreciate it.
    Cheers,
    Ash

    My advice, over the 5+ yrs Mac Pro memory:
    Try with just the Crucial.
    Remove the pair of 512s - doesn't add much
    having 6 DIMMs is WORST config
    best is 4 DIMMs matched quad set: 4 x 2GB or 4 x 4GB.
    the smaller DIMMs should go down to 3/4.
    Forget TTPro to test RAM. Use AHT yes but "no errors" usually means Riser is okay and mechanically the DIMMs are okay but might need more.
    However, it is next to impossible to say for certain, and you can always find mixing brands or batches same can be a problem.
    I would not say "correct" though.
    correctly to Riser A 3+4 alongside 2 x 512MB Kingston sticks in Riser A 1+2, and 2 x 2GB Kingston sticks in Riser B 1+2.
    High density or largest in DIMM slots 1 & 2
    Sometimes a configuration works that doesn't make total sense, like all the 4 x 2GB all on Riser A.
    Riser A: 2 x 4GB
    Riser B: 2 x 2GB

  • Mac Pro not correctly updating?

    Can anyone help me?
    I am working on a Mac Pro 5,1 (OSX 10.6.8).
    This computer will not update correctly. If I try to install multiple updates, it tells me the computer must restart in order to install the updates. So I click on restart, and it actually does more of a log out. No updates ever occur.
    So if I select to install multiple updates.... the updates fail. However, if I update individually... updating works.
    So I am trying to figure out how to fix the problem. I am sure someone will just say, simply update individually. That is not an option, in my estimation. This is an expensive product that should function normally and as intended.
    Any suggestions? Thanks

    Well, there is the rare chance that you have system disk drive problems of one type or another and are not doing what maintenance the end user can and should do including clone your system and use Disk Repair and other tools.
    You may even need to try with a clean install and update, and then use Setup Assistant.
    Nothing beats having bootable system backups along with TimeMachine.
    If you have Lion or Mountain Lion use Recovery Mode.
    Use Safe Mode too.
    Computers need the tires changed and rotated and oil, air and brake fluid maintained too.

  • 4x NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT cards in a Mac Pro run below max supported speed

    Hi,
    We have 4 "identical" NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT 256MB cards in one Mac Pro (to support 8 DVI monitors for a Network Operations Center). One card came with the system, the other cards were purchased from Apple at the same time. This was a refurbished computer, so we didn't have the build-to-order option. I put identical in quotes because they seem to have different ROM revisions.
    The system mainly shows graphs on webpages and HP OpenView (via X11), so no heavy-duty gaming or refreshes.
    We have been running with 6 monitors for the past 4 months with the following monitors:
    - 1x 42" LCD with 1280x768, 32 bit color, DVI
    - 5x 22" LCD with 1680x1050, 60Hz, 32 bit color, DVI
    When I restart the system, at least one of the 22" monitors takes 5 or 10 minutes of flashing on then off (mostly off) before it finally syncs up and shows a constant image. The 42" LCD won't go to its native resolution (can't recall what that is right now), so have to go down to a less optional 1280x768. In the next day or so, I'll be connecting one more identical 22" LCD and then soon after another 42" monitor, but am wondering if they will work. Yesterday, I saw a post about firmware update for this video card (http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/geforce7300gtfirmwareupdate.html). I also noticed that two of the cards have ROM Revision 3008 and two have 3011 ROM Revision of the cards (in System Profiler). I'm not sure yet if this firmware update increases the ROM Revision.
    Running the Expansion Slot Utility (/System/Library/CoreServices/) shows that my PCI Express profile is set to Two x8 Lane + Two x4 Lane slots. All slots say that they are running below maximum speed.
    The store.apple.com site still shows this configuration as a valid build-to-order, but I wonder if they do something different or extra.
    Does anyone else have experience with 4 of these video cards with this many monitors?
    Any experience with the Firmware Upgrade that I should know about?
    Thank for any insight!

    l_elephant wrote:
    I notice that the flasher is connected to a card with ROM revision 3011, the later one.
    I noticed this too.
    now, to the slot profiles.
    you say;
    "The first one that I enter is the one to the right (looking from the back of the system)."
    so you mean that the mac is laying on its side and your in the back, and what you call 'slot 1' is to the right? is that correct?
    No, the system is upright, but the cards are horizontally seated. Pardon my ascii art, but here's the layout if I look from the back of the Mac Pro:
    | DVI DVI ---->> slot 4
    | DVI DVI ---->> slot 3
    | DVI DVI ---->> slot 2
    | DVI DVI ---->> slot 1
    So, there are two DVI ports on each card (which is in a slot). I'm not sure which lane is which.
    Either the left (as pictured) is lane 1, or the right (as pictured) is lane 2.
    i ask because i'm wondering if your reproducing the way the expansion slot utility is graphically portraying it. I'm pretty sure the utility is showing the slots as if the mac is upright and the person is looking into the side of it with the access panel off.
    Okay, sounds logical!
    if you say that you have two x4 lanes and two x8 lanes, then i'm deducing that your flasher is on an x4 lane, and as it is, one of your x8 lanes has only one lonely monitor on it.
    Probably correct.
    In my utility window, it is the fourth configuration, so you would have at the moment;
    slot4__x4__22" and 22"
    slot3__x4__42" and 22" flasher
    slot2__x8__22" and empty
    slot1__x8__22" and 22"
    I think that you have 2 and 3 reversed.
    i would suggest trying the third configuration thusly;
    slot4__x8__22" and 22"
    slot3__x1__22" and empty
    slot2__x8__42" and 22" flasher
    slot1__x8__22" and 22"
    in other words, check off the third configuration in the utility, then
    exchange the connections on the second and third cards, leaving the first and fourth cards be.
    Okay, will do.
    as far as running below max speed, i figure as long as your workload doesn't suffer, then its fine.
    Oh, and another question, does it always, always flash when you boot-up?
    Do you guys shut down the system every night?
    We rarely reboot it, and I'm not the only one that would see it reboot. This system is in a 24x7 Network Operations Center. I just know that rebooting takes a while for the monitor to come up all of the way.
    Thanks for all of your help and guidance so far!
    David

  • 2010 Mac Pro, Overheat, Fans Won't Speed Up

    Hi all,
    I was using my 2010(5.1) quad core single CPU mac pro for video conversion using Handbrake. I have the Hardware monitor installed and was able to see the core temperatures from the odd core numbers(actual cores) went up to 86+ degree celcius(NOT Fahrenheit). What I noticed was that the Fan speeds were still pretty much the same as when the computer is idle(a very slight increase). I saw that another person also experience this with the 2009 mac pro: http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/feedback/2009_mac_pro_cputemps/2009MacPro_cpu_temps.h tml
    This is a quote from the article: And I still wonder why the 'booster' fans (in the heatsinks) never seem to spin up very much off the default speeds. (On my dual 2.66, even with cores(not the heatsink or diodes) in the 80's C the booster fans are reported to only be a hundred rpm or so higher than idle on my system.)
    I wonder about the same thing:why the 'booster' fans (in the heatsinks) never seem to spin up very much off the default speeds?
    Do we both have defective computers? Or something else is going on.
    I realized these CPUs will shut itself off when it reach critical temperature(might cause permanent damage) at about 95-100 degree Celcius, but I don't understand why my mac pro doesn't just boost up its fans at that point closer to the hard shutdown(86+ celcius).
    Does anyone that have the 2009 or newer mac pro(4.1 or 5.1) knows at what core temperatures that the fans speed up considerably?
    Thank you

    d10nisius wrote:...I tried the the temperature gauge, but for whatever reason it didn't work correctly on my mac pro(2010)...
    Initial, that app, which was originally called '"Check My Temp" didn't work properly with my Mac Pro either, but updates got it working better.
    ...Does your fan ramping up pretty often? When it is speeds up, can you tell me what your cpu core temperature?...
    Using smcFanControl, both one of the fan speeds and one of the temperature readings is always in the menu bar. When I see it approach 100ºF, I switch to a higher fan speed combination, so I'm usually ahead of whatever SMC will eventually do automatically. Right now checking Check My Temp, and using Apple's default fan speed settings, CPU A Core is 152ºF, its heatsink is 90ºF, the BOOSTA default fan speed is 800 RPM but the actual speed is 1070 RPM. Of interest is that the iStat Pro reading for CPU A is also 90ºF, suggesting that it may not be reading the core temp, assuming that core temp reading is correct. Ambient is about 68º. One thing that may make a bit of difference is that I'm filtering the air in the CPU tunnel (the bottom section with the intake fan up front, the CPU fan in the processor tray, and the exhaust fan in back) since that's the hardest to clean out. That may restrict the air flow a bit but the filter does capture dust and, especially in warm weather, I make sure to keep it clean.

  • How do I get the Mac Pro (2013) to recognize 4K monitors correctly?

    I have a 2013 Mac Pro, Six core, 32GB ram, FirePro 700s, 1TB storage, OS X 10.10. It's connected to a Samsung UN50HU6950FXZA 50" UHD TV via HDMI. The system info recognizes this monitor as a 120.5-inch with 7680 by 4050 resolution. WOW. In the Displays Preferences, this resolution shows up as "best for display". The actual resolution of the monitor is 3840 by 2160, but the closest scaled resolution shown is 3840 by 2025. This actually almost works ok, but requires setting the monitor to "fit" instead of 16 x 9; otherwise the image is slightly too wide for the screen. This happens whether the monitor is connected to the computers USB port or to a Thunderbolt port with a Mini DisplayPort-to-HDMI adapter. I've tried every combination. I've also booted from a different system disk, reset PRAM and power manager multiple times, used various combinations of monitors, disconnected all peripherals, run hardware diagnostics, everything.
    I tried to use the computer with a Seiki 39-inch UHD monitor and it also showed up with these weird resolutions sometimes on startup, maybe once in five times. I thought it was a monitor problem, so tried the Samsung.
    There's more, too. The machine doesn't play well with multiple monitors if one of the monitors is a 4K., it is not happy when I uses Spaces with a 4K monitor. In some cases, Final Cut Pro or Premiere CC will get jerky playback, the mouse pointer develops trails, other symptoms that look like graphics card failure. Only a restart corrects these issues.  When the computer wakes from sleep and a 4K monitor is used, the application windows do not come back to the same place on the screen; with 2 monitors, the windows may come back on the wrong screen or the menu may be on the wrong screen, or both.
    I wonder if anyone else is having similar problems. I have been on chat and phone with Apple support multiple times over this issue doing screen sharing and various diagnostics.  While they keep trying and escalating, no real progress has been made. I bought the Mac Pro to be able to work with 4K video and actually display it. So far it works, but there are lots of compromises and work-arounds. Apple has suggested bringing the machine to the Apple Store, but since it works fine with smaller monitors, that probably won't help. I finally got a support person to say they may need to try on-site service. I have a call scheduled for Monday--so maybe something will happen.
    The Pro is a great machine, but this stuff has been driving me crazy for months now. It's a great machine that just isn't ready for 4K yet

    The available display proprieties are based on information that the monitor/TV sends to the Mac. It appears it is not sending the correct info.
    You said " This happens whether the monitor is connected to the computers USB port or to a Thunderbolt port with a Mini DisplayPort-to-HDMI adapter.".
    I am confused about the reference to USB.
    Does the TV have a displayport or mini displayport input, that is best to use.
    Try using the free Display Menu app from the Mac app store. I have to use that to get 3840x2160 (native resolution) on my Dell monitor)

  • Mac Pro not recognizing bootable DVDs and Disk Utility giving odd results.

    My issue is complex, but I'll try my best to explain it as I can.
    One has been resolved it seems, but I am including it so that the whole issue can be seen in context.
    Friday, May 16, 2014
    Last night, after rebooting my Mac Pro from my Bootcamp partition (I'm using Windows 7 Professional if that information is helpful) I received a kernel panic upon Mac OS X booting (Mac OS X 10.6.8).
    My first action was to launch Disk Utility to verify the Mac HD, verify was stopped by disk utility citing that I should insert my Mac OS X install DVD and repair the disk.
    I tried booting from my Snow Leopard install DVD. After the grey Apple logo appeared with the gear spinning below it remained for roughly ten to fifteen seconds (a little long) — then the Apple logo changed to. A grey prohibitory sign (circle with a diagonal line through it, the spinning gear remained. — I tried booting from the Snow Leopard DVD a few time, same result.
    Following this I tried booting using Disk Warrior, same result again.
    I tried booting both the Snow Leopard and Disk Warrior DVDs in both my upper and lower optical drives, with no change.
    I decided to leave the issue and call Apple Support in the morning
    Saturday, May 17, 2014
    This morning I woke my Mac Pro from sleep, opened Disk Utility and tried verifying the hard drive to see if it was temporary — same result, 'please insert the Mac OS X install DVD and repair the drive.' — I also tried booting the install DVD again with no result.
    I then booted my Mac into Safe Mode to check my hardware.
    Upon opening Disk Utility and verifying my Mac HD — the result "Macintosh HD appears to be OK", rand the test again to see if this was an anomaly, but disk returned another pass.
    I performed a normal restart of my system, although Finder was a little slower to load than normal, the system booted correctly. — I then launched Disk Utility and verified the Mac HD, it returned another pass.
    This confused me, after a call to Apple Support the tech explained that 'sometime a Safe Mode boot will fix problems because it disables all non-essential processes when booting. — That makes sense to me.
    However.
    The issue of my Mac not recognizing bootable DVDs remains — it reads disks correctly, it just will not boot them.
    Other steps I have taken to try and resolve this remaining issue.
    1. a PRAM reset. — No change.
    2. an SMC reset. — No change.
    3. Removal of newly installed RAM. — I have tried both running the old and new RAM separately, no change using either combination.
    4. Running bootable DVDs in different optical bays. — No change from both bays.
    a. My upper drive is an MCE Blu-Ray/DVD combo drive, but I have booted from this drive before. (Less than six months old.)
    b. My lower drive is LG DVD-RAM combo drive, I have also booted from this drive before. (Over one year old, replacement for an Apple optical drive.)
    None of the above steps have helped, I still cannot boot from my optical drives — I always receive a prohibitory sign shortly after the Apple logo.
    Other system information:
    Mac OS X 10.6.8
    8GB of RAM (4 x 2GB)
    500GB Western Digital Caviar Blue HDD (less than a year old, boot drive for Mac OS X 10.6.8)
    1TB Samsung HDD (for data storage and also containing Bootcamp partition)
    2TB HDD (cannot remember manufacturer, contains Time Machine backups, as well as data storage)
    ATI Radeon HD 5770 with 1GB of VRAM
    Sorry for the long post but I really need to be able to boot from my optical drives.

    Update: found an old Mountain Lion installation USB flash drive I created a while back.
    I am able to boot from the ML USB flash drive, but am still unable to boot from my either my Snow Leopard Install DVD or my Disk Warrior DVD. — I have verified both DVD and they pass verification tests.
    This leads me to believe that the problem resides either in the Mac, or in BOTH  the Snow Leopard and Disk Warrior DVDs.
    Since I am able to boot from a USB drive, I will look into the possibility of creating a bootable Snow Leopard drive, and perhaps also a Disk Warrior drive — at least until I can resolve the 'not able to boot from DVD' issue.

Maybe you are looking for