Making maximum y value negative

I am trying to make a chart with data that spans -10 to -6. When I chart it, Numbers makes the maximum y value zero by default. I would like the y axis to span -12 to -4. Any help would be appreciated.
Michael

Michael,
Please submit Numbers Feedback. I agree with you that a negative upper limit should be available.
Jerry

Similar Messages

Making an entered value negative dynamically

Hello,
Does anyone know the simplest way to automatically convert a number entered into a field to a negative value? For example if 7.5 were entered the value stored would be -7.5 Users often forget to add the '-'before a value and I want to elliminate this problem.
Kind Regards,
Steve Welch

this works.
abs will always return a positive number.... even if it was negivite like example below -10... then lead with "-" and it will make it a negitive number.
example:
select - abs(-10) from dual;
Thanks Jade

Sales order getting maximum doc value exceeds but not blocking.

Hi Experts,
My client using automatic credit control .
And for one risk category we have activated max doc value and sen the value is -0.01. It means even though for the free of charge sales orders also should be block.
I have created a sales order with free of charge item with value of 0.00 after getting warning message and it is blocking.
And i have one scenario for service items , where am creating sales order with value of 0.00 for the service items and while saving the sale order getting warning message and it is not blocking.
Why this sales order is not showing in vkm1 event though if i get warning message while saving the sales order time.
Please any body help out form this issue
Regards
Venkat

Hi
That i already setup and maximum doc.value i have set there -0.01.
The same functionality is working for diffrent sales document type,but it is not working for this service sales document processing.
Is there any scenario like if there is no delivery further process it should not block
Please revert immediately if any body knows
Regards
Venkat
Edited by: venkat s on Jun 8, 2009 1:28 PM

Setting up maximum order value for vendor

Hi experts,
I want to set a maximum price/value limit for vendor for giving order
For example - i want to set a maximum limit of 1lakh for vendor A
when ever I create PO for vendor A , system should chck the maximum value for A vendor.
And if there a many open order for vendor A, then the total of open PO's shoukld be
counted and when ever i am creating new PO & if ec=xceeds the value 1 lakh then
system should not allow to create the new PO
Vendor A      PO1     value - 50000      status - open
vendor A     PO2     value - 30000     status - open
vendor A     PO3     value - 40000     status - creating now
At the time of creating PO3, PO value exceeds the vendor limit, so it should not allow to create/save the PO3
please let me know how to handle this

Hi,
This can get really complex unless you have clear vision of what you want to control.
For example, the maximum limit that you want to set, is it for the current month / current year etc?
If it is the sum of all Open PO value, would you consider the PO's that were created the sme month and delivered but payment is pending though Invopice is posted?
So answers to such questions provide the clarity for teh controls that need to set in place.
For this you can create a Z table and maintain the limits that you like to set based on the criterion like monthly or yearly.
Then Use a user-exit in the PO to calculate the net value of all open PO's for the vendor and then validate with the Z table and throw an error if it exceeds.
However the performance may get effected with such calculations on PO save.
in that case you may have to consider storing the cumulated PO value on every PO creation and PO Completion.
Consider all this and take a decision.
hope this helps.

Acquistion Value Negative in Area 01 while posting Goods Receipt (MIGO)

While posting a Goods Receipt am facing the error Acquistion Value Negative in Area 01.
The related Purchasing Document has an Account Assignment as AUC.
I have checked the Asset Master of that AUC. In the Depreciation Areas Tab when I am
trying to put the negative values allowed, it says that E669 Fiscal year 2009 is already closed in Financial Accounting.
Practically it is not possible for me to open the fical year 2009 in Financial Accounting since our Fiscal Year Variant is V3(April-March) and we currently in the period
05/2010.
Point to be considered is that Year end closing for Fixed Assets (AJAB) for 2008 is complete and year 2009 for Fixed Assets should ideally be open.
Please let me how to handle the situation without opening the closed Fiscal Year in Financial Accounting.
Regards
Gemini

Gemini,
First set your COD with OAPL.
Go to OADB and choose all values allowed for acquisition value under management of values for your effected dep area.
SAVE and import these settings to your production system and post your GRN.
Thanks,
Srinu

How to find out Maximum date value in RPD.

Hi All,
I have a date column i want to get the maximum date value from that column. I am trying this expression MAX( "sales"."book"."date") in new logical column i am getting the RPD inconsistence error. Database is SQL server 2005. Is there any problem in my syntax?
Thanks in advance.

Is that column date part of time dimension?
What does error say? syntax should be ok - maybe something to do with your DB settings in physical layer.
can you try to create the same column in Answers? (select fx button of the column and then add MAX ( ) around the column.
Edited by: wildmight on Jun 12, 2009 10:09 AM

Need a maximum date value using group by

Create table student (dept number(10), dep_name varchar2(10),join_date date,years_attended number(10),end_date date);
insert into student values (1,'I',to_date('3/7/1917','MM/DD/YYYY'),4,to_date('8/26/1987','MM/DD/YYYY'));
insert into student values (1,'I',to_date('1/1/1900','MM/DD/YYYY'),4,to_date('8/26/1932','MM/DD/YYYY'));
insert into student values (1,'D',to_date('1/1/1920','MM/DD/YYYY'),5,to_date('8/26/1994','MM/DD/YYYY'));
insert into student values (1,'C',to_date('1/1/1920','MM/DD/YYYY'),6,to_date('8/26/1945','MM/DD/YYYY'));
insert into student values (2,'I',to_date('7/1/1900','MM/DD/YYYY'),3,to_date('8/26/1932','MM/DD/YYYY'));
insert into student values (2,'I',to_date('8/16/1916','MM/DD/YYYY'),9,to_date('8/26/1923','MM/DD/YYYY'));
insert into student values (2,'D',to_date('8/16/1916','MM/DD/YYYY'),10,to_date('8/26/1987','MM/DD/YYYY'));
insert into student values (3,'I',to_date('3/7/1917','MM/DD/YYYY'),4,to_date('8/26/1987','MM/DD/YYYY'));
insert into student values (3,'D',to_date('7/28/1920','MM/DD/YYYY'),6,to_date('8/26/1945','MM/DD/YYYY'));
insert into student values (3,'I',to_date('7/28/1920','MM/DD/YYYY'),8,to_date('8/26/1965','MM/DD/YYYY'));
insert into student values (4,'I',to_date('12/31/1924','MM/DD/YYYY'),2,to_date('8/26/1998','MM/DD/YYYY'));
insert into student values (4,'I',to_date('6/10/1929','MM/DD/YYYY'),1,to_date('8/26/1943','MM/DD/YYYY'));
insert into student values (4,'C',to_date('1/17/1927','MM/DD/YYYY'),4,to_date('8/26/1955','MM/DD/YYYY'));
insert into student values (4,'C',to_date('6/10/1929','MM/DD/YYYY'),30,to_date('8/26/1967','MM/DD/YYYY'));
insert into student values (5,'D',to_date('2/10/1931','MM/DD/YYYY'),2,to_date('8/26/1943','MM/DD/YYYY'));
insert into student values (5,'I',to_date('2/10/1931','MM/DD/YYYY'),24,to_date('8/26/1962','MM/DD/YYYY'));
commit;I need a maximum date value join_date for each department. If max(join_date) has two records for each dept then max(end_date) should be considered. I have used a below select query
select * from student where join_date in (select
max(join_date) from student group by dept);which gives me the following result
1     D     1/1/1920     5     8/26/1994
1     C     1/1/1920     6     8/26/1945
2     I     8/16/1916     9     8/26/1923
2     D     8/16/1916     10     8/26/1987
3     D     7/28/1920     6     8/26/1945
3     I     7/28/1920     8     8/26/1965
4     I     6/10/1929     1     8/26/1943
4     C     6/10/1929     30     8/26/1967
5     D     2/10/1931     2     8/26/1943
5     I     2/10/1931     24     8/26/1962But I am looking for the result which gives me only one maximum value for each dept column. First it should look for maximum value of join_date, if two records has same join_date then max(end_date) should be considered. The result should be sumthing like this
1     D     1/1/1920     5     8/26/1994
2     D     8/16/1916     10     8/26/1987
3     I     7/28/1920     8     8/26/1965
4     C     6/10/1929     30     8/26/1967
5     I     2/10/1931     24     8/26/1962Can you please tell me how to rewrite the select query to get the above results.
Edited by: user11872870 on Aug 2, 2011 5:29 PM
Edited by: user11872870 on Aug 2, 2011 5:36 PM

Hi,
That's called a Top-N Query , and here's one way to do it:
WITH     got_r_num     AS
     SELECT     student.*
     ,     ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( PARTITION BY dept
                               ORDER BY         join_date     DESC
                         ,                end_date     DESC
                       )      AS r_num
     FROM    student
SELECT       dept, dep_name, join_date, years_attended, end_date
FROM       got_r_num
WHERE       r_num     = 1
ORDER BY dept
;Another way is similar to what you originally posted:
SELECT    *
FROM       student
WHERE        (dept, join_date, end_date)
               IN (
                    SELECT    dept
               ,       MAX (join_date)
               ,       MAX (end_date) KEEP (DENSE_RANK LAST ORDER BY join_date)
               FROM      student
               GROUP BY     dept
               );I suspect the first way (using ROW_NUMBER) will be faster.
Also, the ROW_NUMBER approach is guaranteed to return only 1 row per dept. Using the GROUP BY approach,if there is a tie on join_date and end_date, then it will return all contenders in that dept. Using ROW_NUMBER, it's easy to add as many tie-breaking expressions as you want, and, if there is still a tie, it will arbirarily pick one of the rows involved in the tie as #1.
Thanks for posting the CREATE TABLE and INSERT statments! That's very helpful.
Edited by: Frank Kulash on Aug 2, 2011 9:00 PM
Added GROUP BY alternative

Acquisition value negative in Depriciation Area 01

When i am trying to post a revenue recived from from insurence company it is giving the error : " Acquision value negative in derpiciation area 01", even though their is value showing in asset explorer.
Please suggest the possible solution.
Thanks & Regards

Hai Team,
Check it once the OADB t.code and select ur Dep Area here u can maintain Acquistion Value is All Values allowed or whtever ur want
Regards
Madhu I

Relevance of Maximum Plan Value for Cost Center wise SKF plan Data

Hi,
Will you please tell me the relevence of data entered as Maximum Plan Value for the Cost center wise SKF data plan i.e. data entered through T Code KP46 using planning layout 1-301 with planning profile SAPALL.
Regards,
Partha B.

Hi,
Try 0CO_OM_CCA_1.

Internal Order settlement "Acquisition value negative"

Hello,
Internal Orders Settlement Process (TRX KO8G) Received the message "Acquisition Value negative in area 01" for I/O # 850100 & 861650 when attempting to run the February 2014 Settlement.
What went wrong? How can I resolve this issue?

Hello,
There are 2 ways to solve this issue.
1. Check why there is a negative value posted on this asset? If the posting is correct, then
or
2. Allow the negative value posting in Asset master (AS02) ->Depreciation areas-> Double click on the depreciation areas -> Negative posting.
I suggest you to not to check the option "All values allowed", because you may loose the flexibility of negative value posting.
Hope this helps

Acquisition value negative in area

Dear All ,
I got an error that is "Acquisition value negative in area " while running CJ88 .
The total of APC for that asset is zero , not have negatif balance.
( The option of negatif value is allowed is not selected on asset.)
Why i got that error ? Do you have any idea ?
Thanks , Best Regards
Dash

Hi,
Typically negative acquisition of assets will not be allowed. However, instances like CIP/AUC assets have it enabled.
To check, go to asset master (AS03) >> Depreciaiton area tab
Double click on the area and check if 'Negative acquisition' is ticked.
Regards,
Sridevi

Error Acquisition value negative in area 15. Message no. AA617

Hi all,
I have capitalized an AUC but after capitalization only i came to know that it has been over valued for 2000 BHD now i want to reverse that 2000 BHD which is over capitalized , i tried doing this in f-02 with transaction type 101 and i am getting the below error
Acquisition value negative in area 15.
Message no. AA617
Asset affected: 000000400012-0000
I have to pass the following entry
Debit Vendor
Credit Asset
is the way i have done is correct if not please guide me in this issue
Thanks In advance
Vinu

Hi Paul,
Now am getting below error when i tried pk 75 and tran type 100
Balance for transaction type group 10 negative for the area 01
Message no. AA629
Asset affected: 000000100031-0000
Diagnosis
With the transaction entered, the balance for the transactions in group 10 in area 01 will be negative in this fiscal year. However, the balance of transaction type group 10, according to its definition, must be positive in each fiscal year.
System Response
The system rejects this posting.
Procedure
Check the transaction type, the amount and the fiscal year in your posting. If you want to post a credit memo to an acquisition from the previous year, then use a transaction type for a retirement. If necessary, you can change balance rules after talking with your SAP consultant.
Please help me for the above issue.
thanks & regards
VINU

Aquisition value negative in 01

Hi guys,
User getting the following error
Aquisition value negative in 01
when trying to post asset purchase in f-90
tried going to tcode-as02
change of asset master data -go to depriciation cdubblclick on book dep and click on negetive value allowed
But not working
Problem is there only with one business area.rest are working fine.
Thnx

hi
in the 'time dependant' tab of AS02, you find the Business area and Cost center for the asset.
thanks

Acquistion value negative in area 01 while doing MIRO

Hi Gurus,
Lot of threds were posted on this error message but my scenario looks different.
We have acquired an asset through PO-GR.
The sequence of GR transactions:
1. Acquistion posted through GR for $100.
2. Reversed the GR.
3. Acquisition posted through GR for $102.
4. Reversed teh GR.
5. Acquisition posted through GR for $1000.
Now, we are trying to do IR using MIRO transaction and the system showing three line items in simulation.
1. Posting to vendor account for $1000.
2. Posting to trade AP account for $1000.
3. Posting to Asset reconciliation account for $0.
The document is balanced but when we try to post, it is giving a message "Acquistion value negative in area 01".
First of all, I dont understand why the third line item is generated and why the system is giving this message when we are not posing a negative value.
I have checkd the depreciation area 01 settings and it is allowing only positive and zero value for acquisions.
Please share your thoughts on this?
Thanks,
Mano.

Hi MS,
I appreciate your suggestion but as i mentioned in my post we are not posting any negative value to the asset.It is not a credit memo either just an invoice.
Thx,
Mano.

In Safari, what does "maximum cookie value" mean?

My granddaughter on her MBP is getting an error from Safari about "maximum cookie value" - can someone interpret that for me? Happens when she opens 7-8 wondows from a specific stie, and then she can't open any more.
Thanks!

Safari > Preferences > Privacy > Remove All Website Data

Making maximum y value negative

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for