Managing multiple boot partitions

HI,
I Have multiple boot partitions on my mac pro. 1 mountain lion and 1 snow leopard. is there any way to make disks read only to the other bootable partitions?
so for example, when im in one of my snow leopard I dont want snow leopard to be able to write to my mountain lion and vise versa. Please let me know.

iJny9956: Ok.  I'll walk you through this best I can over the web.  You'll need to go through the whole process twice—once for each OS.
1) Boot into one of your operating systems.
2) Log into an Admin account
3) Launch "Disk Utility"
4) Select the drive or partition containing the operating system you want to make read-only (so, if you're booted into Mountain Lion (ML) select the Snow Leopard (SL) partition, and vice versa)
5) Get Info… on that drive or partition by using the Command-i keystroke, or File > Get Info
6) In the window that appears, look for the line beginning, "Universal Unique Identifier".  The long string of numbers, digits and dashes after this is the value you'll need for fstab.
7) Select this long string, excluding any spaces at the beginning or end, and Copy it.
8) Now launch Terminal—you'll find it in /Applications/Utilties, alongside Disk Utility
9) Type: sudo vifs
10) Hit Enter.  You'll be presented with a warning if you haven't used sudo before, and then a prompt for a password.
11) Enter your Admin password.  You'll receive no visual feedback of the characters you enter—this is normal.  Hit Enter.
12) You've now entered a command-line text editor called vim, which has in turn opened the fstab file for you to edit.  This is the only recommended way to edit the fstab file, as the text file itself will say.
13) Use your cursor keys and move the cursor to the empty space below the warning text.  Press the letter "o" on your keyboard.  This will open a new line below where your cursor was, and allow you to enter text.
14) Enter the following text—each entry on the line should be separated by a single space, as I've done here:
UUID=XXX-XXX-XXX-XXX-XXX none hfs ro
Instead of entering the "XXX…"s, paste in the value you copied from Disk Utility.  Make sure there is no space between the "=" and the start of the value you paste.  "none" means the disk or partition should be mounted to the default location, so you can ignore this; "hfs" defines the filesystem being used on the disk or partition; "ro" is the variable that means, "read-only".
15) That's it.  Press Escape once, then type a colon:
You'll see this colon appear at the very foot of the Terminal window.  Now type:
qw
These stand for "quit" & "write".  Hit Enter, and the text editor will save and quit.
And that's it.  If you reboot your Mac Pro at this stage and boot into the same OS you were just working in, you should find that the other OS's drive or partition is now read-only.  You can confirm this, after you've rebooted, by launching Terminal again and typing:
mount
Hit Enter, and you'll see a list of all your mounted devices.  Some you won't recognize, but you should see that the line referring to the other OS's drive will have, "read-only" next to it.
Now, just repeat for the other OS, and you should be done.  If you have any questions, post back here.  NB: to stop the other OS's drive mounting at all on boot, replace "ro" in step 14 above with, "noauto".  If you want to use more than one variable here, separate them with a comma but don't add a space—eg.:
ro,noauto,noexec
In this example, a drive will not be mounted on boot, but when it is explicitly mounted (eg. with Disk Utility) it will mount Read-Only, and with the ability to launch programs stored on that drive removed ("noexec").  This latter can be useful if you use Spotlight to launch applications and don't want to accidentally launch an application on the other OS's drive.
HTH.
PS: I was in a hurry and didn't proof-read this.  Any questions, just post back.

Similar Messages

  • Can you use Windows 7 to partition a Boot Camp created drive (not just a PC partition on a Mac drive) into multiple PC partitions?

    Can you use Windows 7 to partition a Boot Camp created dedicated PC drive (not just a PC partition on a Mac drive) into multiple PC partitions?

    Can you download this utility, it is a close equivalent of the gpt command, but has more features? (It is more than likely that Windows took over and converted this to an MBR disk).
    http://sourceforge.net/projects/gptfdisk/
    Once you have it installed you run it as follows. You can execute using either /dev/disk1 or /dev/rdisk1 as the parameter.
    type gdisk
    gdisk is /usr/sbin/gdisk
    sudo gdisk /dev/disk0
    Password:
    GPT fdisk (gdisk) version 0.8.9
    Warning: Devices opened with shared lock will not have their
    partition table automatically reloaded!
    Partition table scan:
      MBR: hybrid
      BSD: not present
      APM: not present
      GPT: present
    Found valid GPT with hybrid MBR; using GPT.
    Command (? for help): p
    Disk /dev/disk0: 1954210120 sectors, 931.8 GiB
    Logical sector size: 512 bytes
    Disk identifier (GUID): 6ED0C429-00D1-4759-B50E-04B6FB80D0E3
    Partition table holds up to 128 entries
    First usable sector is 34, last usable sector is 1954210086
    Partitions will be aligned on 8-sector boundaries
    Total free space is 1293 sectors (646.5 KiB)
    Number  Start (sector)    End (sector)  Size       Code  Name
       1              40          409639   200.0 MiB   EF00  EFI System Partition
       2          409640      1452940543   692.6 GiB   AF00  Customer
       3      1452940544      1454210079   619.9 MiB   AB00  Recovery HD
       4      1454211072      1954209791   238.4 GiB   0700  BOOTCAMP
    Command (? for help): q

  • On a Multiple Boot iMac, FireFox is getting fonts from wrong partition

    I run FireFox on an iMac. I have a primary partition on the build-in harddrive. Using an external harddrive, I've build another system on Snow Leopard on which I can do experiemtns safe from my main system (safe if I be reasonably careful). One of the issues is doing this is that applications that offer to update themselves do so when I'm in the 'wrong' boot. I should refuse to do it then. But I think I did so. Now adays when I startup FireFox, it is asking permission to use fonts on the boot partition of my alternate system. Using Font Book on my main system I see that the main system has fonts of the same name and probably same font data.
    How do I fix the configuration of FireFox on the main partition to look for and find the fonts in the fonts installed in that boot parition?

    Some threads about this issue that you can look at:
    * [/questions/770549] "Firefox wants to use the font ..."
    * [/questions/768100] Why does firefox want to use different fonts on mounted hard drives
    Move all User fonts in Font Book to Computer fonts.
    # Launch Font Book (/Applications/Utilities/)
    # Open Font Book > Preferences
    # Deselect: "Automatic Font Activation"
    # Set the "Default Install Location" for fonts to "Computer"
    # Select all User fonts
    # Move the selected User fonts to Computer fonts
    # Remove all duplicate fonts in Computer fonts

  • Error code -50 on boot partition (Mac OS Extended (Journaled) )

    I`m often experiencing error code -50 when trying to change or move files on boot partition (Mac OS Extended (Journaled) ) on my MacBook PRO 5,5.
    I already know that this error is related to MS-DOS formatted disks. But this one is all the time Mac OS Extended (Journaled).
    All the files are created on Mac OS X 10.6.7 - so there can`t be a problem with a filename.
    Is there another solution than corrupted harddisk?

    while the next error code -50, I looked into Console and kernel says: "BootCache: too many history clusters (151, limit 151)". So that`s the cause of error, but how can I manage with it?
    I tried this one in Terminal
    code:
    /usr/sbin/BootCacheControl stop
    but no success. "-BootCacheControl: could not stop cache: Operation not permitted"
    any ideas?

  • How do I prevent the Lion boot partition from being reformatted when using boot camp?

    Under Windows 7, Computer Mgt, I shrink the C drive to create another drive.  When I right click on the unused drive to format it, 200MB Lion boot is formatted and assigned a drive letter F.  But I did not tell Windows 7 Computer Management to do that.  I clicked on the unused 170GB space to create it as F, I did not click on the 200MB Lion boot partition at the front of the list.
    Now I have to take the computer back to the Apple store to reinstall Lion for me.
    I tried this twice and it happened twice.  So now I need to go back to the Apple store a second time for help on the same problem.
    Would the 200MB Lion boot disk at the front be safe from reformatting if I first made it drive letter F, and then made the new drive letter H at the right side of the drive list in Computer Management?  Also, there is an unlettered drive between the Lion drive E and the Windows 7 drive C.  Should I make that G prior to formatting drive H?
    By the way, I did this on another MacBook pro that was using Snow Leopard, following the same procedure, and had no problems.  So could a different version of Boot Camp be the issue?

    I just found an older question similar to this one that you also replied to. It was from 2012 and never solved. The only things I am using in my set up is a male quarter inch cable from my guitar to my interface, a USB cable from my interface to my computer, and headphones from my interface to my ears of course. Just like in the other question I found I have everything in the Audio MIDI Setup of the computer set to use the interface as input and output and I also have everything in garage band setup to use the interface as audio input and output. Any new track is recording the metronome and any old track that is being played in the headphones. No external speakers are being used for monitoring and no microphones are being used.

  • Share between several platforms, dual/multiple boot

    Hi here!!
    I review a lot of mozilla docs (out dated or without complete info), forums, googling ... about how to share firefox/thunderbird/ligthing data between platforms on dual/multiple boot system.
    Every user in same trouble are repeating (copy/paste) in the solution to share the SAME FULL PROFILE on all platforms. I review profile data and folders and I can see files and config data that are platform dependent; then I think that share FULL PROFILE between is not the best approach, for example Linux and Windows will produce several problems (and a lot of problems with the add-ons)
    In these same mozilla docs recommends to share only data and maintain custom profile for each platform, but not more info how to do it.
    Please can some kind advanced :) provide some info about the correct approach. Or a better tech info about how is possible the recommendation of sharing same profile between platforms without problems. Because with the current doc info, there is no way to get a clear answer (Almost I can't :~).
    Thx guys!

    ''the-edmeister [[#answer-675259|said]]''
    <blockquote>
    The Mozilla Developer Network documentation is here:
    https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/
    </blockquote>
    Thanks, but As I said at first I reviewed mozilla docs too, but mozilla only do mention profiles content or management, but not how to share in multiple platforms or how profile must be created or be treated as cross-plattform.
    https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/profiles-where-firefox-stores-user-data
    https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Multiple_Firefox_Profiles
    Some googling and bloging ... a lot of people are saying (repeating coping & pasting same solution), share complete profile between platforms, but this is not correct, in profile folder you can see platform dependent data as in the prefs.js file. And maybe, some schema database issues (but no info about it in mozilla)
    I reviewed this doc and all their related links a couple of days ago:
    http://kb.mozillazine.org/Sharing_a_profile_between_Windows_and_Linux
    I'm very apreciate some notes how to do second main way recomended, that sais:
    <blockquote>
    " -- Share everything except for the settings, themes, and extensions. Separate profiles are created for each operating system to avoid problems in prefs.js due to Windows naming conventions... ... .... Each profile uses its own extensions directory for extensions and themes, so it doesn't matter if the extensions are operating system specific or not. "
    </blockquote>
    The apparent only way to seem is to manually review all .ini and files and review all db schemas ... and manually overwritte they??. But I thin profile is "data", and data must be cross-platform... sure exist some more reliable approach to setup this on sharing platforms.

  • [SOLVED] Longwinded beginner - Dual-boot & partition questions

    Hello,
    I'm interested in installing Arch Linux alongside Windows XP (dual-boot). I have little previous linux experience, although I have rented some servers that have used it in the past, as well as compiling some stuff with it while at University (studying Computer Science). Nevertheless, I am relatively confident that if I can still boot into XP, I will be able to acccustomise myself and like the fact that this distribution seems to be hands-on and leaves a lot up to the user.
    I've been reading the Beginner's Guide and the dual boot guide, and I would like to get started, however, I'm not going to go ahead with this until I am certain that I will be left with a system that can still boot into Windows XP. I assume that it'll take me a while to get to grips with Arch, and in the meantime it would be massively inconvenient if I couldn't work/play/etc...
    What I already know
    Anyway, currently I have a 250GB hard drive that I use for Windows (as well as 3 other hard drives full of stuff). I have partitioned the drive with Windows XP on it with gparted like so:
    (in order)
    UNALLOCATED                         32GB
    SDB1 (Windows XP)                 50GB
    SDB2 (Downloads)                  150GB
    I hope to use the unallocated space to hold linux (and then have access to my other windows drives in the future, using ntfs-3g), however, I am a little confused over what partitions I 'should' have and how large they should be, considering that I will use the OS to mainly develop, browse the web, listen to music, etc...
    I was thinking:
    /boot    -- ext2         -- 100MB
    /          -- ext4         -- 15GB
    swap    --                -- 1GB
    /home  -- ext4         -- 12GB
    /var     -- ReiserFS   -- 4GB
    Questions
    • Is 30GB too little, even though most of my stuff is on other NTFS hard drives?
    • How large should / be? I've read that it contains /bin, /dev, /etc and others. How do I know how much space these need? Am I misunderstanding things?
    • Is a /var partition unnecessary? How large should it be?
    • 10GB for /home, 1GB for swap, 100MB for /boot?
    • Do I need a /tmp or /usr? This is a single-user machine, but I don't want it to get messy!
    • I was thinking of giving /boot ext2, and /var ReiserFS, and then giving every other partition ext4. That okay?
    • Do I need to set these partitions up when installing, or can I set them up in advance with gparted - it might be simpler.
    • Due to already having 2 NTFS primary partitions on the hard disk, I presume that some of the above will need to be logical partitions in an extended partition? How is this done?
    Once the partitions have been set up, and linux is installed, I presume it's just a matter of completing the rest of Part I of the guide, and then ammending /boot/grub/menu.lst to include 'Windows XP'? At that point I am able to restart Windows XP, and only delve into Arch when I want to continue with the configuration, fixing, and so on...
    Sorry for the wall of text, and thanks for your patience. (:
    Last edited by Bedtimes (2009-09-27 14:21:55)

    That's the thing, I expect that I'm doing something wrong with the GRUB loader - and I admit my hard disk layout has been quite strange for a long time before installing linux.
    Basically, it currently looks like this:
    /dev/sda1    ntfs    Music           250GB
    /dev/sdb3    ext2   /boot           120MB
    /dev/dsb4    extended
    ---- /dev/sdb5    linux-swap       1GB
    ---- /dev/sdb6    ext4    /           20GB
    ---- /dev/sdb7    ext4    /home   12GB
    /dev/sdb1    ntfs    Windows XP  50GB
    /dev/sdb2    ntfs    Downloads    150GB
    /dev/sdc1    ntfs    TV & Movies   950GB
    • This list is in order that the entries appear on the hard disk, hence /boot is in the first 1024 cylinders of the hard disk, but as you can see the sdb numbers are actually in the chronological order that I created them.
    • I used an extended partition with logical partitions inside since I had read that there was an issue with more than 4 partitions in a hard disk, and I already had 2 NTFS partitions.
    • When it asked me to install GRUB to the MBR, I installed it to SDB as opposed to SDBx as it asked me to in the manual. This is the drive that contains /boot!
    • I just managed to amend something in the menu.lst, in order that I can boot into Windows XP. Therefore my machine is not totally fucked up any more. (: Unfortunately, what I changed doesn't make sense to me, since I would have expected Windows XP to be on a different hard disk.
    The contents of sdb3:
    grub    kernel26-fallback.img    kernel26.img
    lost+found    System.map26    umlinuz26
    When typing the command /sbin/blkid:
    /dev/sda1: UUID="D0..." LABEL="Music" TYPE="ntfs"
    /dev/sdb1: UUID="A8..." LABEL="Windows XP" TYPE="ntfs"
    /dev/sdb2: UUID="557..." LABEL="Downloads" TYPE="ntfs"
    /dev/sdb3: UUID="2676..." TYPE="ext2"
    /dev/sdb5: UUID="0474..." TYPE="swap"
    /dev/sdb6: UUID="0886..." TYPE="ext4"
    /dev/sdb7: UUID="519becf..." TYPE="ext4"
    /dev/sdc1: UUID="46AC59" LABEL="TV & Movies" TYPE="ntfs"
    Inside /boot/grub/menu.lst:
    timeout 5
    default 0
    color light-blue/black light-cyan/blue
    # (1) Windows XP
    title Windows XP
    rootnoverify (hd0,0)
    chainloader +1
    # (2) Arch Linux
    title Arch Linux
    root (hd1,5)
    kernel /boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/disk/by-uuid/0886... ro vga=773
    initrd          /boot/kernel26.img
    # (3) Arch Linux (Fallback)
    title Arch Linux (Fallback)
    root (hd1,5)
    kernel /boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/disk/by-uuid/0886... ro vga=773
    initrd          /boot/kernel26-fallback.img
    edit: I'm able to access all of the installation partitions with gparted-live's terminal (by mounting the devices I need to access into folders in my root folder), so is there anything else you want me to check/change in order to find my linux root/boot partition?
    Last edited by Bedtimes (2009-09-27 12:54:24)

  • I deleted the extra boot partition, will there be any problems with upgrading to Lion 10.7.2?

    I have a Macbook 5,2, with a triple boot setup including Lion, Windows 7, and Ubuntu, managed by rEFIt.  After upgrading from Snow Leopard, the Lion installer created a "boot partition" before my Windows partition, screwing up my mbr/gpt sync and making me unable to boot into the other operating systems.  After many tries at other fixes, I deleted the boot partition after first copying its contents to an external HFS+ partition, and resized my Lion partition to include that space (although there is still a few hundred megabytes separating Lion and Windows).
    Since the 10.7.2 release notes specifically mention changes to how the boot partition is accessed, I wanted to make sure, before upgrading, that it will not once again wreak havoc on my partition scheme by installing another boot partition or trying to modify the Windows partition thinking it is the missing boot partition.  I think I read somewhere that in certain multi-boot setups, the Lion installer did not add the boot partition specifically to avoid the problems I was having; how do I make sure that I do not have them again?
    Thanks.

    You shouldn't have any issues, since Parallels v9 is the current version.  You might want to visit the Parallels support forums to see if users there are aware of any issues.  I know I upgraded my MBP from Mountain Lion to Mavericks and I had no issues with my Parallels v8.  A short while after the update to Mavericks, I did upgrade my Parallels to v9, but I wasn't really having any problems on v8 either.

  • Multiple booting - through esata port, usb, firewire

    i'm testing usb, esata, firewire ports for multiple booting and if anyone has also experimented just let me know p.s i remember there was another topic last year about it

    I have tried to boot from eSATA, and I discovered a trick.  In the BIOS, you have to switch the SATA mode from AHCI to IDE (aka legacy, compatibility, or just off).
    I have a Y450 with a built-in eSATA port and an Intel ICH9 SATA controller.  I  bought an external powered enclosure that has an eSATA connector.  The BIOS would not recognize the external drive, and so wouldn't list it in the boot order.  It would recognize and boot from it via the USB connection however.  Also, even though not recognized by the BIOS when connected via eSATA, once Windows 7 booted up, it found and used the drive just fine.  I was able to partition and format it in Windows 7 over the eSATA connection.  I was also able to boot Linux from CD-ROM, and then it also was able to see the eSATA drive (and install Linux).  I just wasn't able to boot from it.
    I experimented with settings in the BIOS, and found that if I set the SATA mode to IDE, then the BIOS did recognize the eSATA drive, list it in the boot order, and could boot from it.  I've had no problems booting and running Linux on the eSATA drive this way, and performance measurements are close to the manufacturer's specs for average read throughput.  What I lose without ACHI is native command queueing (which could provide a performance in random read cases), and hot plugging.  Oh well.
    The big pain is that I have to switch back to ACHI in order to boot Windows 7 on the internal drive.  Otherwise I get the blue screen of death, due to Windows expecting SATA devices, not IDE.
    I think Lenovo could fix the BIOS if it wanted to.  I wish it would...
    Greg Holmberg

  • Setup Windows TS step changes boot partition from C to D

    Greetings,
      I have a build and capture task sequence. In the Winpe phase I create one single partition (no bde). During the WinPE phase, diskpart says this drive is C and I can copy stuff to the C drive no problem. Once the "Setup Windows and configmgr"
    step starts and reboots into the OS, the OS in "my computer" says its on the D drive. How can I make sure that the reboot into the OS keeps the C drive for the boot partition?
    Thanks
    David Z

    I generally set OSDPreserveDriveLetter also and it works fine however there is a lengthy support blog for times when even it doesn't work:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/system_center_configuration_manager_operating_system_deployment_support_blog/archive/2014/04/28/how-to-ensure-that-windows-installs-on-c-during-a-system-center-2012-configuration-manager-osd-task-sequence.aspx
    Jason | http://blog.configmgrftw.com

  • Z87-G45 Multiple SSD's & Multiple Boot WXP/W7/W8.1 ???

    Hi there, gave up on my old K8T board following advice from BB2K and bought a G45 with a large i5k & 16GB memory & Geoforce GPU...all working great.
    Have installed WIN 8.1 on a Samsung 840 Pro SSD. Also Win 7 on a second Samsung SSD and currently installing Win XP 64 on another Samsung SSD. Have updated them fully & used the MSI Live updater so each drive is as good as it gets patch wise.
    Again individually each drive working great. But I do not know how to make the system multiple boot.
    Tried briefly with all three drives. Machines sees them but no matter which hardware selection I make it goes into WIN 8.1. If I disconnect and just have one drive in, each O/S boots fine.
    Having on a previous machine had WIN 8.1 control the boot of the same drive configuration, it was a bit flimsy and I'd prefer the MSI board do this via hardware but am unsure how to do that......to be honest first modern MB I've worked on since the bad old days (circa 2003) so unfamiliar with new options & terminology.
    Can anyone suggest best way and options please to achieve this? Or is there an article or link you could point me towards?
    Appreciate any pointers or help I can get from anyone. Made my first post a couple of weeks back and had super help with that one. Fingers crossed this time. Many thanks

    Quote from: badboy2k on 03-December-14, 07:33:59
    to set up a RAID0 you go into the BIOS and change:
    1: the drive mode to Raid
    2: save and exit
    3: as it restarts hit CTRL+J
    4: in the new interface tell it to make a Raid array
    5: set it to Raid 0
    6: assign all 3 Drives to the Raid 0
    7: let it make the raid array
    8: format the RAID
    now your good to go
    it may be easier to use the software boot manager as you will need to download the RAID drivers for your board and make sure you have them when you install each OS as you need the RAID driver for it to function correctly!
    software boot manager: upside: would be easier to set up and more safe as you will have 3 intendant disks. downside: you do not like that way and they will only be at SATA 3 speed.
    RAID 0: upside: would be more streamlined and would have a side effect of being alot faster during operation as you have 3 drives each with full SATA3 speed acting as a single drive (1500MB/s ish read so it will be incredibly fast)! Down side: if a drive goes bad you would have to start over again and make the raid and install the OS's again.
    Very interesting stuff. Well that makes things interesting because the intention is to make the machine a sort of "thin client" or "netbook".....ish. I have a large RAID10 NAs which the aim is to take all the data management issues and leave the PC's with minimal data and apps on them.
    And given that SSD's 'should' be more reliable than the old mechanical drives then you would hope that a potential drive failure should be a less frequent event.
    I like the potential speed advantages and was not aware of that. And on the RAID front, would it be an option to step up to something like RAID5 or RAID10? Or would that be an overhead or complexity a bridge too far?
    The drivers you mention, do you mean for the Samsung Pro 840 drives themselves?
    I sense a rebuild coming on!
    Edit: .... thinking on, I have access to another Crucial 256GB SSD. Would that be something I could add to the RAID array? If we are going to bite the bullet then I'd prefer doing it only once. And if the RAID 5 or 10 option really was an option then having 4 drives (3 Samsung and the larger Crucial one) would be a good way to go. But I read that all the drives have to be the same....is that the case? Certainly on my NAS box it is the case very specifically so.
    But if I could add this unit it might make sense to do so.

  • How do i manage multiple users and devices with one apple id without everything showing up on every device?

    how do i manage multiple users and devices with one apple id without everything showing up on every device?

    How to use multiple iPhone, iPad, or iPod devices with one computer

  • How do I manage multiple itunes devices ?

    How do I manage multiple itunes devices with other family members on a single computer?
    I do not want to share libraries.

    There's a couple of options (other than using specified playlists or manual management out of a single library).
    The following document is worth checking through: 
    How to use multiple iPods, iPads, or iPhones with one computer

  • How do I manage multiple devices on the iCloud

    How do I manage multiple devices on the icloud.  We have 2 ipods, 2 iphones, ipad and a mac and right now the icloud thinks my son has my phone.

    Try going to Settings>Mail,Contacts,Calendars>My Info (in the Contacts section), then select your contact from the list.

  • Methods to managing multiple devices and accounts.

    My wife just got a new iPhone.  this is added to my iPhone and a few iPod touches for the kids.  Between cloud accounts, apple accounts, itunes accounts,  . . . What is the best way to manages multiple accounts and what is the differentiation between the different accounts?  I am not even sure what accounts are available.  Is my Apple account different from my iTunes account?  Apple ID seems to be everywhere.  So I need my wife to have her own Apple ID, this I believe to be true.  But what about syncing to the general iTunes account. We have one iMac with all our music on it.  How can she sync with her Mac Book for contacts or what ever and sync to the family iTunes account for music.  I am so confused?  Help.
    Thank you,
    Doug

    Have a read
    http://www.macstories.net/stories/ios-5-icloud-tips-sharing-an-apple-id-with-you r-family/

Maybe you are looking for

  • Blue Screen BSOD need Help!

    Hi, my Thinkpad SL510 is giving me a blue screen and a black box in the middle of the screen. I had or still have the 'Mobogenie virus" on my computer and downloaded and run 'Spyhunter 4' which found a lot of things, but upon restarting I now have th

  • Menu Transition not playing completely

    I have an Encore Project with transition videos created to go from menu to scene selection, and scene selection to menu etc. I also have a first play / intro video. When I build out an image to test it, the intro video plays correctly (to lead into t

  • How to create new file folders for pics

    My sd card may be corrupt, but I tried to move pictures to new folders and I get the message "Directory full".  How would I normally make new folders so that I can have separate folders for different subjects?

  • JDeveloper Web Service Client/Proxy Basic Authentication

    Hi I recently migrated a 10g Web Service to an 11g Web Service that uses basic authentication. I then generated the client/proxy using the WSDL for my consumer application in JDeveloper 11g. however I cannot find any functions that will allow me to s

  • Solution: Apache2 personal web sharing 403 Forbidden error

    Many people are puzzled about Apache 2 throwing 403 Forbidden errors when accessing the user's personal website, although the computer website works. And a lot of incorrect solutions are floating around. I decided to post some info that hopefully wil