Mass strategy group change - 40 to 52

Hi experts,
I want to change strategy group from 40 to 52 for about 2000 materials.
It implies that PIR type and customer reqmt type change from VSF/KSV to VSE/KSVS.
Mass PIR change is not a problem because PIR are transfered from an APO system.
But then there is an issue with existing schedule lines with customer reqmt type KSV which don't
consume anymore the PIR.
Is there a standard tcode or program to mass update the schedule lines rqmt type ?
What is the good practice to perform this change ?
Thanks in advance,
Raphael

Dear
If u Have the Idea of LSMW then try to do the changes wht ever u want by LSMW ...
It will be much easy for mass Changes .Otherwise , you need to first delete all the the PIR's of VSF requirement type using transaction MD62 , once PIR is delete you need to run MRP in "Delete Recreate Mode". Planned orders which are firmed will not be automatically deleted in MRP run , you cal delete these orders in MASS using transaction MD16.
Next would be to check all the sales order which derived VSF/KSV  procurement requirement type, you need to delete this line item and need to create new ones with VSE/KSVS.  requirement type.
To carry on material level changes for planning startegy , either u should goto MASS/MM17 but it will not affect the exixting deamand or Customer Requireimenet .You need to changes the Requirement Type at PIR-SChedule line as well as Customer requirement Type .
Regards
JH
Edited by: Jiaul Haque on Feb 21, 2011 9:21 AM
Edited by: Jiaul Haque on Feb 21, 2011 9:22 AM

Similar Messages

  • Transfer of data from R/3 to APO for strategy group

    Hi,
            Can we transfer materials from R/3 to APO that donot have R/3 strategy group 10, 40, 50, 60, 70?
    I am trying to transfer a material with MRP type Z4. Everything else is maintained properly but the material doesn't show up in APO. The plant is transferred, the setting in CFC9 is 2 and the no blocks in SMQ. I tried CFP1 as well but it not even collected there. The message type CIFMAT is checked and ALE change pointer checked in BD 61.
    Thanks.
    Edited by: Visu Venkat on Apr 26, 2008 6:04 PM

    Hi
    Just to recheck what you have written, Planning without final assembly should be Proposed Strategy 30 in APO. Has the config in your APO system been amended or did you mistype? 
    If it was strategy 70 in R/3 then there is a note which would have been relavant I think:
    [Note 711107 - Transfer strategy group 70 to SAP APO without manual changes|https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/711107]
    Regards
    Ian

  • MRP exception message 64 and planning strategy group 52

    Hi Gurus,
    I have done extensive search online in the forum to find the route cause why we are getting MRP exception message 64 for a specific material in one of our plants. This exception message does not occur for the same materials which is also produced in another plant.
    I was just wondering whether the planning strategy group of 52 in MRP 3 view would have any effect on the frequent occurrence of exception message 64. I know that the 64 message occurs when the routing time is higher than the in house production time. If that's the case where to look for in routing to correct this, apart from this do we need to look at work centers and other details. I'm not a  PP person but still was curious to know see if i could take a shot at it.
    Also the MRP settings that we follow in the plant where this problem does not occur is NETCH, Create PR - 2, Schedule lines - 3, create MRP list - 1, Planning mode - 3, scheduling -2
    in the plant where the 64 message occurs quite often is Netch, Create PR -2, Schedule lines - 3, create MRP list - 1, planning mode - 1, Schdeduliing - 1
    I was  thinking do MRP settings and planning strategy group would have any impact on why we are getting the 64 wexception message
    Because of this 63 exception message, the downstream components are getting wrong signals.
    Thanks
    Ravi

    Hello Ravi
    Generallt, exception message "64 - Production finish after order finish" is triggered when the order start date is in the past and system automatically changes to forward scheduling to calculate the finish date.
    Note 1913017 explains how the order basic date is calculated and adjusted in case of forward scheduling, however, you are using strategy 52 and this is a very special scenario, whever VP planned orders are generated.
    The VP planned orders will always be adjusted to the requirements date even if the requirements date is in the past. This is a special feature in the planning segment, since these orders are only kind of 'virtual' planned orders. These orders only have to provide the demand requirements for the components in time.
    Therefore, there is a relationship between strategy 52 (VP planned order) and the exception message observed.
    BR
    Caetano

  • Independent requiement is not comsumed in strategy group 10

    HI Gurus,
    My material is maintained as :
    Strategy group :      10      Make-to-stock production
    Consumption mode     2    backward anf forward
    Indenpendent requirement is created as LSF.
    in MD04, it shows like below:
    stock                            5
    IndReq   LSF     20-       15-
    CusOrd  xxx      1-         16-   
    Reqtype of Cusord is KSL.
    after i finish PGI, it shows like below:
    stock                            4
    IndReq   LSF     20-       16-
    So i have two questions:
    1:why the indReq is not consumed.
    2:how to control when to cosume inreq , when sales order is created or when PGI is done?
    BR,
    Dragsky

    Hi
    In strategy 10 PIR is consumed when delivery is done against sales order.
    This is controlled at the time of definition of MRP strategy IMG->PP->Demand Mgmt->PIR->Planning strategy. by assigning requirement class to the strategy. 
    For st 10 requirement class is 100. for consumption following options are available
    No consumption with customer requirements
    Consume planning with assembly
    Consume planning w/o assembly
    Consume planning material (w/o assembly)
    for 100 option 0 is maintained which is standard sap setting not recommended to change. If you need a different behaviour you can create a new rer class and strategy as per your need.
    Regards
    Abhishek

  • Planning strategy group

    Dear Gurus,
    Please elaborate the function & logic of planning strategy group used for production planning? How the alternate strategies works under main strategy?
    Regards,
    SAP CONS

    Once Planning strategy is created , Then we need to assign planning strategy  in Planning Strategy Group in IMG> Prdn> prdn planning> PIR> define strategy Group,
    In Planning stratergy Group we can assign 1 main strategy and 7 alternate strategy.
    Ex: If the same material is produced both MTS and  rarely MTO means
    Maintain a Main strategy as 10 and Alternate strategy as 20
    Then when ever sale order comes System will take KSL is sale order, system will consider MTS as per Main stratergy
    If you want to procure based on Customer for that Material Then Go to procurement Tab of sale order change the Requirement type as KE. and save, ( system will allow only KSL and KE based On streatergy Group, System will take deafult main stratergy, IF you want to change the stratergy got to sale order procurement tab, change the reqmt type)

  • PO Release Strategy not changed after deletion of few line items with less

    Subject : PO Release Strategy not changed after deletion of few line items with less Total PO
    Dear Friends
    We have issue with PO Release strategy. We have created the PO. with release strategy  with multiple approvers.  After approval of first approval manager , one of the PO line item got deleted and Total PO value is reduced . The new PO value should have changed the PO release strategy. But it is not changed. Old release strategy only showing in the PO which is wrong. 
    Details of the PO
    PO no 4500000123 with 5 line items Total PO value : 100,000 USD Release strategy : AB
    PO line item 5 deleted. Now total PO value changed to 50,000 USD and the PO release strategy should have been changed to AA but not changed. Still showing PO release strategy AB only.
    Are there any OSS notes available to correct his bug.
    Please let me know if you need more details
    Thanks in Advance
    Thanks
    MVS

    Hi,
    release indicators  change it to 4.It may works. Please explore to all 6 indicators..........
    i.e,
    1-cannot be changed
    2-changable,no new determination of strategy
    3-changable,new release in case of strategy
    4-changable,new release in case of strategy or value change
    5-changable,new release if new strategy/outputted
    6-changable,new release if new strategy or value changed/ outputted......
    And check   Characteristic description and value in Classification  of Release strategies ........
    I hope this will help you. Thanking you.
    Regards,
    Venkat.

  • SAP query for Material pricing group changes in material.

    Dear all,
    I'm trying to generate a query for Material Pricing group changes in material. For that I've to retrieve data from follwing three tables MVKE, CDHDR & CDPOS.
    Firstly while generating infoset -
    I tried it by joining tables MVKE & CDHDR, but system is not allowing it, also table CDPOS can't bejoined.
    Then I tried by reading dirctly from table MVKE and then adding additional fields in it. query created using this infoset is giving the output, however it's giving only 1 entry per material entered in input.
    for multiple entries in output for MPG changes in same material I tried creating addtional structure for table CDHDR & CDPOS but again I'm getting only 1 entry per material.
    please suggest how I can get MPG changes done in specified time period for a material.
    Thanks.

    Hi
    Check the report RSSCD100 and run it for object MAT_FULL for table MVKE. Use this report as a template for your own development.
    I hope this helps you
    Regards
    Eduardo
    PD: sorry, the table is DMVKE
    Edited by: E_Hinojosa on Sep 2, 2011 9:37 AM

  • How I check in group by query the group change

    How I check in group by query the group change
    Hi master
    Sir I have master detail table
    This is my query
    select rownum,chartofacc.accid,title,nvl(drbal,0),nvl(crbal,0),
    (select case when nvl(sum(debit),0)-nvl(sum(credit),0)>0 then
    nvl(sum(debit),0)-nvl(sum(credit),0)
    else
    0
    end mfadrttt
    from voudetail where voudetail.accid=chartofacc.accid) as mfadr,
    (select case when nvl(sum(credit),0)-nvl(sum(debit),0)>0 then
    nvl(sum(credit),0)-nvl(sum(debit),0)
    else
    0
    end mfacrttt
    from voudetail where voudetail.accid=chartofacc.accid) as mfacr
    ,nvl(debit,0),nvl(credit,0),voumaster.entdate,voumaster.vno from chartofacc ,accbal,voudetail,voumaster where chartofacc.accid=accbal.accid(+) and chartofacc.accid=voudetail.accid(+) and voumaster.vno=voudetail.vno order by chartofacc.accid,voumaster.entdate,voudetail.VNO;
    Sir I need add opbal from master section to debit in detail section when new group start only after adding I use that column for accumulative total or running balance
    If I get any method when group change system give me any key or indication then I use
    Please give me idea in both field oracle sql and oracle report 6i
    Thank
    aamir

    Hi,
    Please send tables structures and sample data from that tables. And, of course what should be the output. :) Just sending your query won't help us to find a solution.
    Peter D.

  • Vendor Master Mass Upload or change T code

    Hi What is the Tcode for Vendor Master Mass Upload or change .
    Thanks
    Lekhram

    You can use T_code XK99 for mass maintainence ( changes) for Vendor mater data.

  • SEM-BCS Preparation for Consolidation Group Changes

    Hi All,
    Is the task "Preparation for Consolidation Group Changes" only implemented when Consolidation of Investments has also been implemented?
    Does "Preparation for Consolidation Group Changes" have any value on its own?
    Any comments, replies or suggestions most welcome.

    Hi,
    I think that prep for cons group changes is independent (but supplementary to) from CoI.
    See what is said in help:
    "When in the middle of a fiscal year a consolidation unit is either acquired by a consolidation group (acquisition), divested from a consolidation group (divestiture), or <b>changes its accounting technique</b> (method change), the following data must be adjusted:
    - Reported financial data
    - Standardized financial data
    - Consolidated data with posting level 20"
    As you can see, not only consolidated data are to be changed, but also Standardized and Reported.
    Moreover, as is seen above, changes of accounting technique will also trigger such activities.
    So, my answers:
    1. No
    2. Yes.
    Best regards,
    Eugene

  • Different strategy Group

    Dear PP Gurus ,
           I m created a Material No with Strategy group 50 .
    Then i m created Plan Number  For This Material using MD61 Tcode .
    Then i m created Planned Order also for This material.
    Both the Values, Plan Number And Planned Order number Are Stored in Plaf Table .
    But i m created Another Material Number with strategy group 10 Means , In Plaf table Only Stored Planned Order Number .
    Plan Number is not Updated .
    Why Plan Number is Not Updated in Plaf Table ?
    Anythink Mistakes From ABAPer Or Functional .
    Explain Me.....
    Warm Regards ,
    GJ

    Hi
    This is standard functionality and not an error.
    Strategy 50 is related to MTO type of production.
    Planned independent requirements that are planned using this particular strategy 50 are listed in a separate segment in the MRP list. The planned orders are created with the order type VP and are unconvertible. The sales orders for this strategy are entered as individual customer requirements and are maintained in a separate segment in the planning run.
    Strategy 10 is related to MTS type of production and Planned orders can be used interchangebly for any requirement. For this reason plan number is not updated in PLAF table.
    Regards,
    Krishna Mohan

  • User-Groups Change history

    Hi,
    Does SAP system maintains the user-groups change history in any tables. Like it does for users in USH* tables.
    Is Group Creation date, etc is recorded in any table ?
    If user-group description is changed, is it recorded in any tables ?
    Any pointers would be a great help !!!
    Thanks & Regards,
    Chandrasekhar.

    You could check the USGRP* tables to see if any relevant information is present. Hope this helps.

  • Consolidation group change: Balance sheet/income statement balance 14,560

    Dear All,
    While performing the consolidation group change task, system throws the error message :
    Balance sheet/income statement balance 14,560,497.62- INR
    Message no. UCD1011
    Diagnosis
    The document to be posted is not completely in balance.
    Entries involving items of the balance sheet or the income statement must always have a zero balance to ensure that both the balance sheet and the income statement are balanced, respectively. This is not true in this case.
    System Response
    Entry cannot be posted.
    Procedure
    Correct the amounts for the balance sheet items and/or income statement items.
    I have checked the COI Settings and not showing any error.
    I have analysed the problem and found that system is not picking one FS item 107501 i.e Profit and Loss CY.
    Can any one suggest me how to resolve this.
    Thanks in advance.
    G Vinod

    Hi DAN,
    i ll elaborate what i wanted to convey.
    When we upload
    1. TB Equal to ZERO
    2. Net of BS items may not be equal to ZERO
    Eg: if September 2010 (FY is April to Mar) file is being uploaded, the profit till the period September will be in PL items. so to the extent of profit element will be the difference in BS Items.
    when u run profit calculation task, after data upload and validation, system will pass the following entry,
    In case of Loss:
    BS - Profit and loss - CY  -           Dr
    PL-  Profit  before MI         -          Cr
    BS- BS Clearing A/c                     Cr
    PL - PL Clearing  A/c                    Dr
    when u run PCC, system ll pick these two items *BS - Profit and loss - CY and BS- BS Clearing A/c. so obviously, posting cannot be done.
    Please tell me if u still not understand
    Thanks and Regards,
    G Vinod

  • RE_RHTRANS0 usage for mass language key changes

    Hello,
    Does anyone know if it is possible to use RE_RHTRANS0 for mass language key changes, i.e. to have it as a background job?
    I tried to execute RHTRANS0 or RHTRANS0_NO_ALV in the background, but the translation record is not getting created. I think because report output requires an additional manual step to select a row and save. Is there a way to skip this step and automatically change language key for all records in the output?
    Thank you.
    Erika

    Hi,
    Could you please tell more about your solution? I understand how is possible "to press" save button in batch input but how you can automatically fill all not-translated fields in target language with texts from source language?
    Thanks
    Ilgvars Lopatko

  • Cons Group Changes & Divestiture with Equity Holdings

    In the scenario with cons unit hierarchy below, company A is the parent of company B and B is the parent of C and D. B is accounted for using purchase method, while C and D are equity method.
    Cons Group A
         Cons unit A
         Cons group B
              Cons unit B
              Cons unit C
              Cons unit D
    Company B is sold, along with its subsidiaries C and D. In periods previous to the divestiture, there are intercompany transactions between B, C and D, for which eliminations are recorded at posting level 20. For standard reporting these eliminations are ignored for both cons groups A and B due to C and D using equity method.
    In Cons of Investment settings, Posting level 20 records are not included in location of values, calculation base.
    In the period of divestiture, the cons group changes for posting level 22 are created. However, these are recorded directly to cons group B, and are therefore also included in reporting for cons group A. This is causing a problem because the reports exclude the level 20 records but include the offsetting level 22 records.
    Has anyone dealt with this and if so how?
    Am I missing something?
    Thanks for any experiences relating to this and/or suggestions!
    Dan

    Just extending the same point,
    system will generate the 22 PL records where in both
    consolidation unit  and partner unit of the group participating
    in eliminations follow purchase method.
    In your case  B (parent company ) is following purchase
    method and investee are following equity method.
    so 22 PL records are not expected.
    since it happened other way , some wild idea may be to check
    whether there is any method change during consolidation
    interval.

Maybe you are looking for