Material Division during order entry

We have the Header Division set to Active in configuration and have all divisions, including the material divisions, defined in CRM.  In our SD system, we set the configuration to not use the material division as this is being used for another purpose.  During order entry in CRM, specifically in the IC, we are getting an error message that the material division doesn't exist.  Is there any way to configure CRM to not use the material division?

Hi Seguin,
CRM configuration supports only for header division. There is no configuration for material division as far as I remember. Looks like a custom development
<b>Reward if helps</b>
Regards,
Paul Kondaveeti

Similar Messages

  • Prepayment functionalitygives an error during Order Entry

    Hi all,
    We have oracle applications Suite - 11i (11.5.10.2) .
    At time of prepayment during Order Entry form, we are getting following error.
    _"Function not available to this responsibility. Change responsibilities or contact your system administrator" ._
    Following is the Navigation Path :
    Sales Order Entry > Query with existing SO > Others TAB > Select ACTIONS button > Select PAYMENTS option .
    Thanks
    Sanjay

    Sanjay,
    This is because the Function that is invoked when you select the Payments Action from Sales Order Screen has not been granted to your responsibility. The best way is to check the ONT_SUPER_USER menu in application Developer (this is the menu that is used by order Management super user), and see what all functions are there (manily the ones without prompts like 'Sales Orders: Print Payment Receipt'). ANd then compare the same with the menu that your responsibility is using (System Adminsitrator >> Security >> Responsibilities). I think you should get your answer. Please let me know.

  • Document currency and exchange rate processing question during order entry

    Hi Gurus,
      I have an issue where all our price records are stored in currency USD. When we take an order for a country that requires pricing to be in an alternate currency, the document currency is changed during order entry. This results in any price condition records retrieved through the condition techique to get converted correctly per the exchange rate. However we have conditions that are calculations off of the conditions retrieved using condition formulas. For example we have a condition which represents 90% of our list price. List price is retrieved in USD  as 10.00 USD and converted to alternate currency 63.40 TTD with an exchange rate of 6.34, but our calculation dollar value remains in USD but displays the alternate currency as 9 TTD, should be 57.06 TTD . We are using standard pricing formulas. I know I can call a conversion function within my formula to get it right, however, is this correct system behavior? I expected standard SAP to convert all price results leveraging exchange rate into document currency. Any guidance will be appreciated.
    Matt

    Hi,
    I went through the problem and still feel that there is somethign wrong in the routine which is used. You can confirm this by removing the routine from the condition type in the PP, and manually entering the value for the c.type in SO in USD and then check if the value is coming correctly in document currency. If the translation is happening for one condition type correctly and not correctly for another condition type, it should be the issue only with the routine.
    Pls check the scenario without the routine and check once and accordingly update the situation.

  • Block material for sales order entry in specific plants

    Hi Experts,
    I wanted to know if there is a simple way to block material from being ordered in a specific plant other than maintaining exclusions. My situation is one sales org, two plants (A & B). Order entry should be blocked at plant A and not B.
    I tried using the material Cross-distribution-chain material status on Sales org 1, but this blocks across all plants.
    I also tried Plant-Specific Material Status on purchasing view, this blocks the material only if it is being procured (non stock). This does not work for materials that does not require procurement. Setting the material to deletion status in MM06 at the plant level will only give a warning.
    Any ideas or suggestions on how to handle this?
    Thanks,
    Nanda

    Lakshmipathi,
      Thank you. But I don't want to entirely cut off the plant from the sales org. I just don't want to be able to create sales order for a few materials in a specific plant. Ex. Material A should not be allowed on sales orders in plant X but should be allowed in plant Y, both are assigned to the same sales org 1000.
    I did some research and found there is no standard way to handle this in SAP, so I decided to go with a user exit MV45AFZZ. By checking against plant specific status (MARC-MMSTA) and if the value is 'XX' then issue an error message.
    Thanks,
    Nanda

  • Product cost during order entry

    Hi,
    Is it possible to enter the product cost during production order order entry, if yes possible please guide me.
    sateesh

    Production Order is more a logistics function. Whenever there is a requirement for a product to be produced an order is created to facilitate capturing the actual materials and labor issued to the order. Order creation could happen throughout the year.
    The standards are generally set at the begining of the year, in some cases even monthly during the budgeting process. This sets up the standard cost which will serve as a standard for production orders wherein the variances are calculated against this standard and monitored.
    Standard costs can be set only once for a period. Hence, standard costs are not set during production order entry.

  • Material Determination during order change

    Hi,
    There is a requirement to trigger Material Determination when a flag gets set on the sales order line item (VBPA). Basically if the flag value on the sales order line item changes via BAPI or VA02 then the material A needs to be swapped with material B. I know that material determination works at the time of order creation or at the time of addition of a line item to an order, does anyone have any experience with this kind of a requirement of material determination trigger during VA02, please share it.
    I have been trying to figure out program MV45AFZZ to look for a user exit but not been able to figure out as yet. I also feel that FM PRODUCT_SUBSTITUTION will need to called through one of these user exits, its just which user exit?

    Well I had got a solution to this problem and happened to login today so posting it now:
    We can make the change in MV45AFIZZ which is screen exit. Flip the material here and everything else gets re-determined.

  • Defining values on SD Billing Plan during order entry

    Scenario-
    User enters a sales order with 10 line items.
    Based on specific material master information (material group, etc), items will be split on two billing plans.
    For example, lines 1, 3, and 10 would go on the first billing plan at 5% of the price.
    The second billing plan would have the remaining 95% for lines 1, 3, and 10.... and 100% for lines 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9.
    I can manually go through this process.  Is there a way to automate?  I see many user exits (old SD style, CMOD/SMOD style, and BAdI style), but they do not appear to manipulate the percentages or fixed values of the billing plan. 
    Are there any enhancements to set values and define the billing plan details?
    Thanks!
    Norm

    Hi Erik,
    Another solution would be to define an output type in the order for sending the mail and to attach a requirement to the output type which will trigger the output only in case the billing block is changed.
    Regards,
    John.

  • SOX: Protecting override ship-to address during order entry

    Hi,
    Our SOX auditors stated that the person entering the sales order cannot also be able to modify the ship-to address for a "drop-ship".  They say this violates segragation of duties.  I am a SD configuer and ABAP developer.  My approach would be to find a user/function exit to add logic to make the override addrss fields be read-only during VA01, then in VA02 allow update only if the users if differnet than who saves the order and has a secrity object so the 2nd person is allowed.
    I did not get to far finding an exit. So, has anyone tackled this very odd request from an R/3 perspective?
    Thanks, Ssott

    This can be very well done. As i succeded in doing in my project
    Goto-SHDO
    enterVA01 and do go on till u get the partner address tab and there u select Wcontent display and save
    and again take VA02 and do the same procedure and save it
    And also dont forget to activate in SHDO nor it will not work
    hope this will clear u
    Sri

  • Product costing during sales order entry

    Dear Experts,
    Pricing Condition EK02 can calculate the actual cost during sales order entry. If the product costing will be activated for each and every order line item for calculating the actual cost EK02 automatically, does this have any down falls to the system performance or anything apart from this ?
    Looking for the expert opinion in this regard.
    Thanks
    Anil

    Hi Allan,
    Ideally if the number of line items would be less than 10 during order entry. Do you think is there any impact because of the costing run for each and every line item ?
    Looking for your response.
    Thanks,
    Sanjay

  • Urgent: Help with Order Entry Verification Requirement

    Hi,
    I have a requirement that must be completed in a few hours. It is as folllow's:
    During order entry the program must verify what material groups the customer is allowed to purchase based on license type.  If the material belongs to group that the customer is not allowed to buy then the system will need to provide an error and do not create the line in the order.
    This is a license type check
    This is supposed to be done through the use of a user-exit.
    Does anyone have any idea what USER-EXIT this refers to and what data is needed in order for the requirement to be completed?
    Responses will be rewarded and greatly appreciated.
    Additional Information:
    Material groups (MARA-MATKL)
         0001 – Beer
         0002 - Still wine
         0003 – Sparkling wine/champ
         0004 – Fortified wine
         0005 – Spirits
    There are other material groups but they are non-alcoholic, so no license is required.
    Customer license type (table KNVV, fields: PRAT1, PRAT2, PRAT3, PRAT4).  License type is specified in:
    Customer master creation
    Sales Area Data
    Sales Tab
    Product attributes
    Product Attributes
    -     PRAT1 - No Spirit License
    -     PRAT2 - No fortified wine license
    -     PRAT3 - No wine license
    -     PRAT4 - No beer license
    Although there are 10 product attributes only the first 4 require a license to be able to purchase them.

    @Lasers_Edge just to avoid confusion: it is not necessary to 'create' variables for TEB's, they are created and assigned by default. I don't like the name of that generic variable because it is identical to the TEB's name but they exist. Good practice to me is to replace those variables by custom user variables, and for that purpose the X button is also available next to the variable name (same button as in the Format accordion for a text container, that allows you to insert a variable)
    @choi.M Another approach is to print the content of those associated variables by a JavaScript that you assign to a Print button. If you prefer the approach to insert the variables in a text container, you could try the Print widget included with Captivate as well.

  • Material availability on order creation

    Hi Experts,
                    In OPJK for availability check during creation under "material availabilty" tab i have maintained checking rule PP, collect. conversion 3 (no creation if material missing) and checked box "check availability while saving".
                                 For availability check during release under "material availabilty" tab i have maintained checking rule 01 and release material 1 (user decides if parts are missing) and checked no other box.
                     But on order creation, inspite of material shortage scheduling is taking place. Only on trying to release material shortage is being shown. How to ensure that during creation itself user gets the option to decide if order is to be created in spite of shortage ?
    Regards

    Hi,
    I have maintained following settings in the system, system gives a information Message during order creation and system is rejecting the order release because of the missing parts.
    1: Availability Check during order creation:
        No check - unselected.
        material availability during order save - checked
        checking rule - (anyone) PP 
        Check type - atp
        collective conversion - (any)
    2: Availability check during order release:
        No Check - unselected
        Status check - unselected
        material availability during order save - checked
        Checking rule - (anyone) 01
        Check type - atp
        Release material - no release if parts missing
       With this settings you should get the warning message " Order has missing parts" (CO292)
    This is just a information message
       If you try to release the order, it will get rejected because of the missing parts ( check the logs, again system will show the missing parts as information message only (CO281))
      It is possible to save the order. If you want to check the missing parts click on the materials button to see the missing parts list.
    Hope this will be helpful to you.
    Pavan

  • SD-how to process material packing before sales order entry?

    Hi,Guys,
    If materials are packed before sales order is created, like:
    materia A,  10 batches was put in one bag,
    how to model it in R/3? Handling Unit Management can still be used?
    Best regards,
    Cherie

    Maybe I should tell the scenario more clearly.
    Following is the physical process in a High-tech company:
    10 finished goods:  A , were produced.Batch is 001.
    In the plant, they are packed into one bag. And this bag has a packing lable number:100
    now comes the sales order for one bag of material A. Stock worker go to the warehouse to get the packing number:100 to deliver this sales order.
    This scenario is different from the standard one using HUM. Because the standard scenario packing the materials when doing order entry,but this one is before order entry.

  • Material Division in Cross-Company Stock Transfer Order

    We are configuring the cross-company code stock transfer order process.  We seem to have all configuration done, but on the PO and Delivery the division that shows up at the item level is the sales area common division, not the division on the material master.  Due to this, the business area is not being assigned correctly (Plant/Division), thus now allowing us to post the invoice.
    Here are the specific Doc types we are using:
    PO: NB
    Delivery: NLCC
    Delivery Item Cat: NLC
    Invoice: IV
    Any ideas as to how to get the division from the material master to show up on the PO and/or delivery so that's what pulls into the invoice?  We also understand the the default Sales Order type DL is set for Delivery Type NLCC in the event there is no Sales Order.  For Sales Order Type DL we have set the Item Division flag, but that is not working either.
    Any ideas?
    Thanks
    Shane Newmyer

    Hi buddi,
    Thanks for the info, but neither of these things help with the division issue.  I need to have the material division on the PO, Del and Invoice...
    Any other ideas?

  • How to find Blocked Stock Value for a Material Division

    Hi Every Body,
    I have gone through the notes 589024,637927 to find out Blocked Stock value for a Particular Material at different plants . But I have to get Blocked Stock value at each Material Division . Kindly give some light on it to get it.
    The steps are same for finding the Consignment stock value and Transit Stock value. So kindly help me if any body has already worked on it.
    With rgds,
    Anil Kumar Sharma .P

    Hi Anil,
    well these notes work but they're prerequisites that have bothered me and unabled me to fulfill our requirement, for instance, having the material number in the drilldown and so on in order to perform the calculation during query execution.
    I believe there is not much more alternative if you still want to calculate valuations accurately at SLOC or any other stock indicator during query execution...
    I started from the basic fact that valuation of material underneath the plant/valuation area  (in my case 1 PLANT = 1 VALAREA).; precisely because all movements doens't carry all information as per the note explanation.
    So what we have done is to pull a cube with all Article/Sites MAP values; this can be done in several ways; MBEW/MBEWH are holding MAP values per fiscal periods; it has sufficient for us until now: our operations are asking to track MAP values more frequently.... So I am investigating how to work this out and have several alternatives:
    - MSEG has additional fields (available in the extract structures) like Total Stock Qty/Value PRIOR the posting. There is as well an indicator telling if the posting is relevant for the valuation (if it is going to affect the Qty/MAP or not). So it is possible to get the MAP after the posting for each material movement.
    - Create a change pointer on MBEW/MBEWH.
    - MKPF has two convenient fields (CPUDATE and CPUTIM) from which we could build our own delta extractor tracking MAP changes
    In BW the Idea  is to have a cube registering the Article/Plant valuation in time (non-cumulative) and then fulfill our queries via a multicube...
    hoping this will help you in solving your issue; I am of course following any topic in this matter so would appreciate your input....
    Olivier.

  • Material issue during breakdown

    Dear Expert,
    I have query like during Breakdown Maintenance ,,, material issuance against order then practically material taking activity from store will lead to more downtime, Company usually have centeral store, so proper issuance of material will lead to gretaed downtime, is there any alternative for the same.
    plz guide
    thanks
    DM

    Dear Deeapk
    I firmly agreed ur points. In my client we are opened the sub stores at imp locations. Even all the time materials issues, goods receipts thro 311 movemnets after receipt form central stores also happening.
    This is working well.
    But generally in breakdown time the material is not reqd instantly. Definitely it needs some time like deelectrification, dismantling. So that in mean time any one member of mtc team take the material.
    Incase stores closed time it may leads probs but this also like same as earlier(bf4 sap implementation).The mgt has to decide to reduce the down time.
    Now days some firms utilising mobile asset mgt to do all kind of sap entry with out accessing the sap log in. This needs integration but iam not much aware
    thenna

Maybe you are looking for