Material replication from R/3 to SRM - Issue with Material group

Hello All,
                  I am working on BADI PRODUCT_CUSTOMER2 and method MAP_R3_TO_CRM_MATERIALMaterial replication part from R/3 to SRM.
I am using a Ztable to map r/3 material group to SRM material group(Product category).
For example Material M1 with material group 100 is transferred to SRM. Material group(Product category) 100 exist in SRM, but I am changing the material group to 200 in the product_customer2 badi.  its working fine.
In another scenario, Material with material M1 with material group 300. Material group(product category) 300 does not exist in SRM,
I am changing the material group to 200 in the bdoc, in the product_customer2 badi. It is not working. The LUW is failing in SMQ2 transaction with the error "Error in Mapping (Details: transaction SMW01)". The BDOC is failing with error "Category for material group 300 does not exist"
I tried to deactivate the badi PRODUCT_CUSTOMER2, even then the FM MAP_BAPIMTCS_AND_PROCESS is validating the material group from R/3.
I tried to change the material group 300 to the existing material group 200 at initial stage in debugging in function module MAP_BAPIMTCS_AND_PROCESS but still the bdoc is failing with error "No storage form defined for product type 01 / logical system".
I am doing my testing using the following steps.
1. change the material descriptioni in MM02 in R/3.
2. An item is displayed in the queue in SMQ2 in SRM.
3. I have debugged the LUW and analyzed my badi by setting breakpoint at method MAP_R3_TO_CRM_MATERIAL, its changing the material group in the bdoc properly.
   that didnt work.
   also i tried to change the material group in the function module MAP_BAPIMTCS_AND_PROCESS before the badi is called.
4. I am checking the BDOc status using tcode SMW01 and checking the material using tcode COMMPR01.
can someone tell me how I can change the R/3 material group to SRM material group at the time of mapping in SRM?
Thanks
Sathish PM

Hi find below for the product cat
Steps to create the product category in SRM:
1) Create MM material groups in ECC client. This will create a transport. Go to SRM Tcode R3AS and select the object u201CDNL_CUST_PROD1u201D from the list and run it. You can monitor the job using R3AM1 in SRM. This will bring the material group into SRM. This can be seen in TCode u201CCOMM_HIERARCHYu201D in SRM.
2) Once it is done. Go to IMG in SRM and go to path SRM> SRM server> Cross app biz settings> Account aassigmnet> Define GL code for Acc *** Cat and Prod Cat. Maintain the GL code against this prod cat for all the account assignment codes. This is client specific setting and need to be done in every client by opening it. This GL code is given in the form in ticket.
3) Do a test and check if the product category is available for procurement in SC.
Regards,
Satish

Similar Messages

  • Vendor replication from R/3 to SRM

    Hi,
    I am using BBPGETVD for the vendor replication from R/3 to SRM.
    I need to modify some fields related to Company data and Vendor data of the vendor during the replication (for example: Vendor should always be created with Invoice Receipt Expected check as checked, Transmission media as 'Mail' etc).
    Can anybody tell me which BAdi or Exit i can use for this purpose.
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    I believe this thread should goto the dedicated forum for SRM.

  • Replicating authorization roles via HR replication from ECC 6 to SRM 5.0

    Hi,
    I'm interested in knowing whether anyone has used the distribution model to copy roles (AG objects) between ECC 6 and SRM 5.0.
    Someone said that it's possible so I would like to validate that statement as I don't know whether it is possible and practical.
    If you have any knowledge or experience could you please share it?
    Regards,
    Jerry

    Hello Yann,
    I was told that it can be done but I don't know enough about the HR replication process to acknowledge or challenge, hence the question.
    Are you implying that it's not possible or simply that it's not done?
    I had an earlier post regarding assigning roles to positions in SRM Replicating authorization roles via HR replication from ECC 6 to SRM 5.0 that you replied to but never replied to my subsequent question. It can be done because one of my other clients is doing it. We're however unable to get it work at my current client's site. Do you have any experience with this subject?
    Regards,
    Jerry

  • I would like to buy a developer license to use on a mac at a public library from a flash drive any issue with this?

    I would like to buy a developer license to use on a mac at a public library from a flash drive any issue with this? Very new to this

    The license is for the Developer not the machine it is run on However there could be soma issues with trying to develop on a public machine.
    The biggest is does the library machine have or will they let you install  and run Xcode and if you are developing for IOS will they let you plug in your devices?
    In addition will they allow you the hours needed on the machine? Most public machines have a time limit especially if there are others waiting to use it.
    All-in-all in can be done but it won;t be an easy situation.
    good luck

  • Issue in  product category replication from R/3 to SRM

    Mehul G Shah: BACKGROUND:
    We are in the process of replicating Material Group from R/3 to SRM
    using transaction R3AR2 & R3AR4. Our Pre-Production server got
    refreshed recently & this has caused all EBM data inclucing Logical
    System & Destination being overwritten with EBP data.
    We have maintained middleware paramaters, viz., CRMCONSUM, CRMRFCPAR,
    CRMPAROLTP & also TBE11.
    We have also maintained sites in CRM Middleware Monitoring Cockpit
    using SMWP.
    We have also tried after deleting entries in tables CRMPRLS (R/3) &
    CRMMLSGUID (EBM) as suggested by SAP note 765018
    We have followed steps mentioned in link /people/marcin.gajewski/blog/2007/02/05/how-to-replicate-material-master-from-r3-to-srm
    (But we are not clear about site attributes which needs to maintain as per the CRM Middleware Monitoring Cockpit.)
    ISSUE:
    Material Group gets replicated to Product Category in SRM. However, the
    Product Category gets replicated with Logical System which is not
    maintained in EBM

    Hi ,
    Thanks 4  ur replay,i have maintained Site attributes,please give me detail of site attributes like which attributes should i maintain ?please give me descriptive answer.

  • Material Replication from ERP to MDM (SRM-MDM Catalog)

    Hi Experts,
    I would like to replicate the material master from the ERP system into the MDM (SRM-MDM Catalog)?
    I don't want to replicate the materials from ERP to SRM, and then from SRM to MDM.
    1. Does ERP provide any transactions to achieve this ( like MECCM / MDM_CLNT_EXTR) ?
    2. Is there a necessity to use the PI system in these communications? If so, what Integration Scenario I need to use in PI Enterprise Repository?
    3. Any further changes to Materials in the ERP system should automatically replicate into the MDM system.
    From SRM, I create SC with items from Materials in MDM.
    Please let me know if you require more information.
    Thanks
    Kasee

    Dear Krupa,
    Thank you for your quick reply.
    So we should consider the scenario where SRM is the central repository for the contracts, and all the changes done in SRM should be replicated to ERP.
    In this scenario, do you know which steps should be done to allow contract replication from SRM to ERP? I already created a central contract in SRM but there is no message sent to PI.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Andreia

  • How to do an initial replication from R/3 to SRM 6.0?

    Hello everyone,
    We are working in a implementation of SRM with R/3. My question is about how I can replicate the existing information in R/3 (PR, PO, Invoices, etc) to SRM (as an initial replication). Especially, I wonder if the documents that are in process have to be finished in R/3 or they can be finished in SRM.
    Thanks
    Ivá

    Hi Ivan,
    In addition to what Masa and Claudia has informed,
    mainly the Material Master, Vendor Master, Plants, Storage locations, UOM, Currencies will get transferred from R/3 to SRM irrespective of your implementation scenario (i.e Classic or Extended classic ).
    In case you work on classic scenario, the main document (leading document) P.O will be in R/3.
    In case of Extended classic scenario, the leading document P.O is in SRM and a copy will be created in R/3 but is not changeable in R/3.
    You can have G.R (confirmation) and invoice in both the systems. In case you create in SRM a copy will be created in R/3. In case you create in R/3 the status gets updated in SRM.
    Hope this makes you more clear.
    Award points for helpful answers.
    Rgds,
    Teja

  • Photo stream "public website" in Internet Explorer - photo thumbnail's are gray, individual photo view is fine. Tested from various computers. No issue with Firefox, Safari or Chrome.

    Dear All,
    Recently I have started to use Photo Stream available from iCloud on iPhone device. I have made “test” photo stream with several photos in and set to “public website” in order to share photos with my relatives.
    The issue is with Internet Explorer where list of photos (thumbnails) are shown in gray color. I can view photo one by one and slideshow also works fine.
    On other computers IE behaves the same way.
    https://www.icloud.com/photostream/#A2532ODWsAl87
    No issue with photo list in thumbnails using Safari, Chrome or Firefox.
    Can someone help on this issue?
    It is very convenient to share photos via photo stream, but most of viewers by default has IE and many of them don’t have iCould account or apple device.
    Kind regards,
    M

    Dear safari rss
    Indeed, you are right, I have updated IE to version 10 and no issue with page view.
    Solution woud be to update IE to version 10 (I have not tested IE9).
    However users using Windows XP can have highest IE version 8. IE9 or IE10 is not suported in XP.
    Unfortunatelly there are still many windows XP at my friends circle.
    Thank you,
    Best regards

  • Issue with Service Group Configuration for a BPM Process

    Hi,
    I am working on BPM processes on CE 711. I need to use the Service Group settings. I created a BPM process with a automated activity that maps to an enterprise service in HU2 (SAP ES Workplace system).
    After setting up the configuration in NWA for service registry and service group, I run the BPM process. The Enterprise Service runs into error and log records it as 'No matching BindingData is found for SOA smart configuration'. I have done most of the configuration as recommended but the matching end point
    url seems to be picked wrongly [http://erp.esworkplace.sap.com/sap/bc/srt/xip/sap/ecc_employeebasicdbyemployeeqr?sap-client=800] .
    I could not get any info on notes search and could not get much info about service group config. Any help here is greatly appreciated.
    Regards
    Suresh

    Hi Suresh,
    i just got an answer on my ticket. Here it is:
    There is a known issue with the upper case of the endpoint published in
    the Services Registry and in the WSDL.
    Before SP2 the matching for the binding for invocation is done
    by the endpoint url. There is a known issue that the endpoint published
    in the Services Registry is with lower case of the characters but in theWSDL the endpoint is with upper case. In your case the endpoint url in
    the Services Registry is as shown in the exception above:
    http://erp.esworkplace.sap.com/sap/bc/srt/xip/sap/ecc_srvcreqcrtrc?sap-client=800
    but in the WSDL the endpoint url is with upper case of the endpoint:
    ../ECC_SRVCREQCRTRC/..
    Because of this difference the call fails. This is fixed is 711 SP2.
    Workaround for this is if you create a Provider System based on your
    WSDL, not a Services Registry one.
    Hope that helps...
    Best regards
    Michael

  • Overwriting Conditions data during Material Replication from R/3 to SRM.

    Hi,
          When creating a new info record and then running the material replication program everything looks OK. However, if for the same material you create a new info record or change the existing info record and then run the material replication, some of the previous data is removed.
          We implemented BADI(PRODUCT_CUSTOMER2) to read info records from R/3. When i debug BADI all the info record and condition info is populated. Once the control leaves the BADI standard SAP code is not inserting/updating delta condition records. It is only populating latest info record.
          SRM 4.0
          Support pack level : 11
          BADI Name: PRODUCT_CUSTOMER2
          Method Name: MAP_R3_TO_CRM_MATERIAL
          Conditions Populated in structure : COMT_PROD_SERVICE_BDOC-                                                         CONDITIONS-CND_BBP_WORKING_SET.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Vineela.

    Hi
    <u><b>Please go through this -></b></u>
    <u>Note 715213 Interface change in BAdIs in Release SRM 4.0
    Note 689135 Conditions are not downloaded when product is updated in R/3</u>
    Note 534899 - Inconsistencies in the Content Workbench
    Note 420343 - TIP: Backend price transfer in product conditions
    Note 459640 - Category error when transferring backend prices with report
    Note 415839 - Removing errors in external product interface
    <b>For pricing condition type, go to the SAP Help links</b>
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm30/helpdata/en/72/f40f3c98ddaa4ce10000000a11402f/content.htm
    and also
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm30/helpdata/en/ee/d9df3bbcce4b37e10000000a114084/content.htm
    <u>Do you use IPC for pricing? I am not sure whether you can use R/3 4.6C with SRM5.5. Check your systems. Refer SAP notes 539720 if you are using simplified pricing (Classic scenario).</u>
    <b>Also check for SAP OSS Notes - 394975 and 420343</b>
    <u>Update of price in srm is possible through the SAP OSS Note 420343. This note describes an option to transfer a price from the Backend via a report and a BADI and to store this price in the condition table of the corresponding product in the EBP. But you have to do small changes,i think this note will certainly helps you to transfer material master prices to srm product master automatically.</u>
    <b>Update Price in SRM 5.5 Automatically using report - EBP_GET_BACKEND_PRICES</b>  
    Re: Update Price in SRM 5.5 Automatically using report EBP_GET_BACKEND_PRICES
    <b>Condition Type SRM - ECC</b>
    Re: Condition Type SRM - ECC
    Re: Replicating additional fields (R/3 4.7) to SRM product master
    Transfer Inforecord Conditions Scales  to SRM Product Master
    Hope this will help.
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Material Replication from R/3 to SRM -  Object status stuck in Running mode

    Hi Experts, I am new to this Forum and I am facing the following issue,
    System Info :
    SRM 5.0
    ECC 6.0
    I am trying to replicate two materials from the backend R/3 system and have set material filters on the SRM side.
    The filters are Table: MARA, Field: MATNR, OP= Equality(=low), LOW = T-SRM13, inclusive defined.
    The filters are Table: MARA, Field: MATNR, OP= Equality(=low), LOW = T-SRM113, inclusive defined.
    This is my sequence of operations in SRM:
    I deleted exisiting queues, started initial load and then activated the inbound Queues for my client.
    Then when checking, Monitor Load objects in SRM, the status for Material is stuck in Running mode with an yellow sign.
    Please let me know if you have any advice.

    Hello,
    First of all, check RFC queues in transatcion SMQ1 and SMQ2 for any detailed information.
    Make sure if Your RFC user has SAP_ALL authorisation - if not add it and delete all material queues and run again.
    Make shure if You run report BBP_PRODUCT_SETTINGS_MW with proper option and unchecked "Test mode". Once you have done this rerun your initial load for DNL_CUST_PROD0,  DNL_CUST_PROD1, BASIS3 and MATERIAL.
    Regards,
    Marcin Gajewski
    Please reward points for helpful answers.

  • Replication from HR not updating SRM Org Unit adddress's

    Hello Guru's
    Can anyone help here , I am working on EC SRM 4.0. We have our SRM Org structure replicated from HR, but for some of the org units in SRM the address has not been replicated, Yet when I check org unit HR PPOSE, the address in the org unit is present and nothing seems out of the ordinary for these org units in HR
    This is causing a problem as the users attached to these nodes without address's are becoming defective and require repair
    Thanks
    Prakash

    Dear Customer,
    This inquiry would really fall under the BC-BMT-OM-ALE component. It might be best to open a thread under this component.
    Information i have found for you on this is as follows. I hope it might help you a bit.
    This issue occurs because the intial distribution has not been done
    correctly. Please review the way to distribute HR datas :
    1- Using transaction PFAL, sending the objects C, O, S successively in
       Update mode with the infotypes 1000, 1002 and 1028 only, without
       using evaluation paths (all existing objects).
       => The objects will then be created without relationship, and no
       error must be reported.
    2- Using transaction PFAL, sending the object P in Update mode.
       => As the structure objects are already present, no error message
       must be generated. If some are, please analyse them, and correct them
       before the next step.
    3- Using transaction PFAL, sending the objects C, O, S successively in
       Update mode (without restrictions, or only the infotype 1001).
       => The relationships which were not sent in step 1 are then
       distributed.
    4- The changes pointers can now be activated and processed, as the
       initialization has been done (steps 1 to 3).
    Hope it helps,
    Kind Regards,
    Edel.

  • Upgrade to Windows 8.1 Pro from Windows 8 Pro causing issues with Remote Server Administration Tools

    Last night I received the Windows 8.1 update and it has caused Remote Server Administration Tools to stop working. I tried to reinstall the tools using Windows8.1-KB2693643-x64.msu but get the following error:
    Windows Update Standalone Installer
    Installer encountered an error: 0x8007000d
    The data is invalid.
    In the event log I have the following error
    Windows update  could not be installed because of error 2147942413 "The data is invalid." (Command line: ""C:\WINDOWS\system32\wusa.exe" "C:\RSAT\Windows8.1-KB2693643-x64.msu" ")
    System
    Provider
    [ Name]
    Microsoft-Windows-WUSA
    [ Guid]
    {09608C12-C1DA-4104-A6FE-B959CF57560A}
    EventID
    3
    Version
    0
    Level
    2
    Task
    0
    Opcode
    0
    Keywords
    0x8000000000000000
    TimeCreated
    [ SystemTime]
    2014-11-05T12:14:18.035865000Z
    EventRecordID
    1562
    Correlation
    Execution
    [ ProcessID]
    5224
    [ ThreadID]
    5132
    Channel
    Setup
    Computer
    removed
    Security
    [ UserID]
    S-1-5-21-1644491937-764733703-854245398-1794
    EventData
    UpdateTitle
    ErrorCode
    2147942413
    ErrorString
    The data is invalid.
    CommandLine
    "C:\WINDOWS\system32\wusa.exe" "C:\RSAT\Windows8.1-KB2693643-x64.msu" 
    I did have the Remote Server Administration Tools installed previously when I was running windows 8 pro and everything was fine. I've tried to remove the older version but according to the below it isn't even installed and Remote Server Administration
    Tools doesn't appear in Turn Windows features on or off.
    c:\RSAT>dism /online /Get-Packages
    Deployment Image Servicing and Management tool
    Version: 6.3.9600.17031
    Image Version: 6.3.9600.17031
    Packages listing:
    Package Identity : Microsoft-Windows-Client-LanguagePack-Package~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~en-US~6.3.9600.16384
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Language Pack
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 06:33
    Package Identity : Microsoft-Windows-Embedded-EmbeddedLockdown-Package-TopLevel~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~7.3.9600.17116
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Microsoft-Windows-Foundation-Package~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.9600.16384
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Foundation
    Install Time : 22/08/2013 14:46
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2891214~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 05/11/2014 01:39
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2902816~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 05/11/2014 01:39
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2919355~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.14
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2920189~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.1
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Security Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2931358~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.2
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Security Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2931366~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.4
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Security Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2932046~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.5
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Feature Pack
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2934018~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.5
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Feature Pack
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2937220~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2937592~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Feature Pack
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2938439~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Feature Pack
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2938772~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2939153~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.1
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2939576~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.1
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Security Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2949621~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.2.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Hotfix
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2950153~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2954879~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.2.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2955164~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.3
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2956575~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.3
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2958262~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.2
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2958263~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.2
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2959626~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.3.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2959977~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.1
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2961072~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.1
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Security Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2962140~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2962872~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.4
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Security Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2964718~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Security Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2965142~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2965500~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2966407~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2966870~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.4
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2967162~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.1
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2968296~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Security Update
    Install Time : 04/11/2014 17:56
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2968599~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.1
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2969817~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2971203~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.1
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2971850~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.2
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Security Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2972103~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.2.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Security Update
    Install Time : 04/11/2014 17:56
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2972280~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.1
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Security Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2973201~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.3
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Security Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2973351~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.2.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Security Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2974008~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2975061~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 07:11
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2975719~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.8
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2976978~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.2.1
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2977292~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Security Update
    Install Time : 04/11/2014 17:56
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2978041~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Security Update
    Install Time : 04/11/2014 17:56
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2979573~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.1
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Security Update
    Install Time : 04/11/2014 17:56
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2979576~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.1
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Security Update
    Install Time : 04/11/2014 17:56
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2979582~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2980654~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.2
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2987107~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.4
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Security Update
    Install Time : 04/11/2014 17:56
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2989542~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.2
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 04/11/2014 17:56
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2990532~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2993651~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.2
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 24/09/2014 10:03
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB2998174~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 04/11/2014 17:56
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB3000061~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.2
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Security Update
    Install Time : 04/11/2014 17:56
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB3000869~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Security Update
    Install Time : 04/11/2014 17:56
    Package Identity : Package_for_KB3000988~31bf3856ad364e35~amd64~~6.3.1.0
    State : Installed
    Release Type : Update
    Install Time : 04/11/2014 17:56
    The operation completed successfully.
    Any help on this issue would be appreciated, if you need any further information please let me know.
    Thanks

    SeniorInternet,
    I’ve seen this issue in the past and it occurred because the file was corrupted. 
    It’s possible that something went wrong when downloading it originally on your newly upgraded machine. 
    Try downloading
    KB2693643 again from another machine and install it.
    Hope this helps!
    Mike
    Windows Outreach Team – IT Pro
    Windows for IT Pros on TechNet

  • Volume key on HP Pavilion dv7 stops responding from now and then, also issue with finger scanner?

    First problem I've been having would have to be the finger scanner. I've only been using this to sign into Windows, but after a day or so of use it would occasionally stop responding (forcing me to sign in manually or reset to fix it).
    For the Volume keys, I've been having trouble getting them to adjust the sound from time to time. Sometimes it works, others it wont (even though the icon screen appears showing they're being pressed, there's no change in volume). I'd end up having to bump the vol up or down manually in the bottom right corner to get it working again). But after awhile the issue ends up reoccuring again.
    I can live with the finger scanning problem but this volume thing is starting to get to me.

    Hello Laurie,
    What is your product number and operating system?  I'll send you a link to the steps to help get everything back, once I get this info from you.
    Thanks!
    ↙-----------How do I give Kudos?| How do I mark a post as Solved? ----------------↓

  • SRM issue with Invoice delta loads

    I am loading data into DSO - 0SRIV_D3 (Invoices) from SRM where I am getting duplicate data records updated into the DSO.  The extractor for this DSO is 0SRM_TD_IV is AIMD which should deliver only after image delta records on changes.
    Can someone advise what needs to be done to avoid data record duplication ? 
    In the Data source setting, the 'Delivery of Duplicate Data Records is set to "Undefined" ' mode.  I have tried to change the data source setting to "None" but this is greyed out and cannot change in BI.  Any help?
    Thanks.
    Ramesh

    I have been wondering about the same thing. Some information would be greatly appreciated. Anyone?
    Thanks and best regards
    debru

Maybe you are looking for