Max number of simultaneous connections?

Hi everyone!
how is possible to determine in advance the max number of simultaneous connection for my FMS?
thanks!

Hi,
Like Jay had mentioned the limitation on the number of connection to server depends on the capability of your server.
You can get the maximum number of connections made to the server, number of active clients... etc details through Administration APIs.
'getServerStats' gives you the "total_connects", which is the maximum number of connections made to the server. "connected" property will return the number of active clients to your server at one point. It also has many more statistics for your reference. This api returns the overall information of the server. If you want to get the details for specific vhost, you can use getVHostStats or getActiveVHostStats. To get more details on Administration API, refer your pdf documentation on "Administration API", that gets installed in your system under "$Root\Flash Media Server\documentation\flashmediaserver_3.5_administrationAPI.pdf".
Regards,
Janaki L

Similar Messages

Sharing: Any way to "bypass" the max number of simultaneous connections of

I want to share one computer at the beginning of a course with 22 (young) users.
Only ten can connect to it simultaneously.
Is there a way to do it - without installing a "server" $$$ ??
Clients are 10.4.11 and shared computer is an runs Leopard.
Thanks.

Is there a way to do it - without installing a "server" $$$ ??
On one machine? Legally? no. That's the limit of the license you agreed to, and is why Server exists.
I'm not even sure it can be done illegally, and even if it could be done, no one here is going to be stupid enough to say
If you have multiple machines, you might be able to get there via resharing - have one machine mount the sharepoint from the first machine and reshare it to another 10 clients - but you'd need three machines to cover your 22 users, performance would suffer and there may be access control issues if multiple users are trying to use the same files at once. Not to mention that three systems costs more than a single copy of Mac OS X Server...

Oracle 10g Express Edition - number of simultaneous connections

Goodmorning,
I'm goingo to test Oracle 10g Express Edition but I ned to know the max numbers of simultaneous connections it supports.
Many thanks to all.

Hi,
>>Can you tel me how to increase this number in oracle 10g express???
Just modifying the processes parameter is sufficient. The sessions parameter will be adjusted automatically.
SQL> alter system set processes=200 scope=spfile;
SQL> shutdown immediate
SQL> startupFor more information, take a look at this [url http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=1672879&#1672879]thread
Cheers
Legatti

Basic IM app number of simultaneous connections

Hi all,
i wanted to know how to calculate or estimate the number of
simultaneous connections that one Flash Media Server installation
(one licence, one server) can handle, in the scope of a basic
Instant Messaging application (online presence and text chat). Did
some of you have direct experience about it?
I found informations only about video streaming & server
stress, but nothing about connections number alone.
Thanks

Well the actual number will depend on your hardware specs and
probably the operating system that FMS is running on. That said,
and a connection test alone, I was able to achieve over 4000
NetConnections to one FMS server on RHEL5, and then the client (not
the server) ran out of stack space because of the amount of sockets
that were concurrently opened. Note: take this number with a grain
of salt, as no activity was performed on the NetConnection. Also to
note, that streaming A/V is usually more intense than simple text
so those numbers would probably be safe to use.

DataSource max number of open connections

We are using Oracle 9i AS.
We are using the pre installed emulated data source.
We have specified 30 and 100 as the min and max number of open connections.
We are using BC4J application modules in my application . For each application module we have specified the JDBC data source, so the default connection pooling at the Application Module level is disabled, via doConnectonPooling = true.
The question :
1. When i go into the OC4J Home screen and monitor the Open JDBC connections, why is the number more than the max that i have specified ? My data source is being used , because my app is up and running.
thx.

Chints -- There were a few cases that where max connections was not honored prior to the Oracle9ias v903 release. These issues should be fixed in the Oracle9iAS v903 production release.
Thanks -- Jeff Would there be any difference if we were to use a non Emulated data source..we are using Oracle 9i on the back end
thx!!

Restrict number of simultaneous connection from client to EJB bean

I have EJB bean and JavaSE client. I want to restrict number of simultaneous connection from client to EJB bean. For example to maximum allowed 3. How I can do it?

:) but answer is too general.
I want to know how to design such "simple reference counting". As I understand it is not recommended to use static variables in EJB. so how to implement such counting in a right way?
Edited by: NoName on Aug 20, 2009 1:25 AM
Edited by: NoName on Aug 20, 2009 1:31 AM

The max number of simultaneous active connections

Hi. We have a 4x NT server running Weblogic 4.5.1 with the performance pack
enabled. We can only get about 7 or 8 active simultaneous connections in our
tests (using LoadRunner with 50 users). The app server log, on startup,
records that 8 native threads are assigned to the server. We are wondering
if there is a relationship here.
We have bumped up the "executeThreadCount" value from the default of 15 and
have not seen any change.
Thanks in advance.
Bill Kline

Hi Rob.
We are running on a 100Mbps network. It is alot of data though.
The servlet is to just drive our the backend components so we can have some
idea of their performance without the rest of the system there. We are still
seeing the same behavior with it. We are switching to a scenario with more
of our midtier components in place. This setup uses a JSP page that drives
an EJB that is the interface to the system.
There is still a possibility though that a servlet may come into play in
some scenarios.
- Bill
An EJB will be In a deploymnet there will be an EJB
Rob Woollen <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Bill Kline wrote:
Hi again Rob.
It appears that its something to do with the servlet that we wrote to
drive
the backend for the tests. I've enclosed a test servlet that is similar,
except it doesn't do anything except send back about 35K of data. Itshows
the same behavior as the one that actually drives our stuff (that isabout
35 TPS).
35K is a relatively large servlet response. Is this typical for your
application? Also, if I understand correctly, you are sending 35K / tx ** 35
trans / s which is ~ 1MB / s. What sort of network connection is thisover?
>
Let me know if you are still having problems.
-- Rob
The round trip (a transaction) is from load runner to the servlet (via a
POST) and the response from the POST.
Thanks for your help so far.
Bill Kline
[email protected]
Rob Woollen <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Bill Kline wrote:
Hi Rob.
Yes its a 4 CPU NT server.
The connections are not refused. They all get accepted, but only 7-8
are
actively being serviced, while the others wait.Can you provide some more detail about your architecture? Forinstance,
what is Load Runner measuring (ie what does a round-trip entail, what
is a
transaction?)
-- Rob
The CPUs are not busy. I
believe the max CPU utilization that has been recorded is around
60%,
but
its often lower (performance recoding is done using PerfMon). Our
main
concern is that we cannot max out the CPUs, so something isthrottling
things.
In the tests we can get about 30-34 transactions per second (tps)with a
transaction being a round trip recorded by Load Runner. The 30 tpsvalue
is
pretty consistent. If we crank up the number of users (say to 150)
we
still
get 30 tps, but the time for a transaction increases rather
dramatically
(to
over 10 seconds). The CPU utilization never really changes. The 30
tps
value
is also very consistent over time. We've run some 10 hour tests.
I was wrong on the "executeThreadCount" not making a difference. I
found
out
that increasing it to 50 from the default of 15 bumped up thetransaction
rate initially but only by a couple of percent. The rate fell afterawhile
back down to the magic 30 tps range. The fellow running the test
tried
an
executeThreadCount value of 300 once and saw no real affect.
Thanks for your time.
- Bill Kline
Rob Woollen <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Bill Kline wrote:
Hi. We have a 4x NT server running Weblogic 4.5.1 with the
performance
pack
enabled. We can only get about 7 or 8 active simultaneous
connections in
our
tests (using LoadRunner with 50 users).What happens when there are > 8 connections? Are the
connections
refused?
The app server log, on startup,
records that 8 native threads are assigned to the server. We arewondering
if there is a relationship here.No, not really. On NT, we assign roughly 2xcpu threads for
native
io
processing. I suspect that you have a 4 cpu system.
-- Rob
We have bumped up the "executeThreadCount" value from the
default of
15
and
have not seen any change.
Thanks in advance.
Bill Kline
Name: TServ.java
TServ.java Type: unspecified type (application/octet-stream)
Encoding: x-uuencode

ACSE - Max. number of simultaneous sessions for a given user?

Hi,
I know in the ACSE one can limit the number of simultaneous sessions for a given user; but is there a maximum number of sessions any one user can have open if they aren't specifically limited? (i.e. - Is there anything to prevent one user from having, say 50 sessions open?)
Thanks,Nick

Hi Nick,
ACS only provide authentication (and authorization and accounting) services with various ability like limiting LOGIN sessions to/through a device, controlling what command to execure (tacacs+) and so on.
However, I don't think ACS has the ability to limit how many sessions can be opened/established from a client to a server or application. This should be controlled by either by the servers or applications.
A device like firewall (PIX/ASA) can only limit connection to a server, but not from a device.
Rgds,
AK

Max number of TCP connections to one IP?

Is there any limit, imposed by the TCP protocol, to the number of active connections to one IP address on one interface?
I'm asking this because it's easy to add more servers behind a load balancer, but I wonder if the TCP protocol limits in some fundamental way the number of connections to the load balancer itself.
Let's say there's an ACE 4710 load balancer in front of a bunch of Web servers. The balancer exposes one IP address to the clients on the public network. The connections are forwarded to the Web servers on the private network. The balancer is also doing NAT: the servers see the connections originating on a private IP on the load balancer.
On the client side, each connection is uniquely identified by the quartet (source IP, source port, dest IP, dest port). So as long as each client only creates one connection, I think the limit here is just the amount of RAM on the load balancer.
On the server side, same thing, each connection is identified by the same quartet, so I guess the theoretical limit here is 64k connections per server, due to the limit imposed by the source port numbers on the load balancer.
OTOH, if the load balancer is not doing NAT (the servers see the connections originating on the public IPs of the clients), then there should be no limit imposed by the TCP protocol.
Is that right? Comments?

you got it right.
Gilles.

HELP!!! Max number of Peoplesoft connections

Hi all:
We are using Peoplesoft on Oracle (HP -UX platform). We are in the middle of adding two more Peoplesoft modules this week. As we expect the number of users to increase 3 times (almost 1200 users, concurrently around 200- 250 users), I am wondering if I need to change any Oacle parameters to handle all those connections.
I am worried when Peoplesoft spawns all those SYSADM connections (200-250) to Oracle, if Oracle will slow down - I am still looking for documentation to guide me in setting Oracle parameters for Peoplesoft.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Just a question, I haven't aware of peoplesoft module and it behaviour, dont peoplesoft uses connection pooling instead of single session for every connection?
Well, do you think of shared server or not?
You may need to have sufficient value for sessions parameter and also max users connection kernal parameter from HP-UX.
Well, having good pga_aggregate_target also helps in perofrmance.
Jaffar

How to restrict max number of client connection per extend server?

Does anybody point me or tell me what is the vm property or config element I need to put so that an extend client will not accept more than specified number of connections at any give point in time.

Hello,
Look at http://coherence.oracle.com/display/COH34UG/acceptor-config the <connection-limit> should do what you want.
Thanks,
Nick

Server 2008 R2 RDP: limit max number of rdp connections per user group?

Hello everyone,
I have a Windows Server 2008 R2 with RDP installed.
I want to create a couple of user groups which will have 5 different users in each. Then I would like to limit RDP connections, let's say 2 connections for the first group and 3 connections for the second group. For example, if 2 users from Group 1 are connected
then when a 3rd user from Group 1 tries to connect it will be rejected to connect, but 3 users from Group 2 still can connect. Is it doable?
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
I would like to check if you need further assistance.
If you need help to create script, please post your questions in our related forums.
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/scriptcenter/en-US/home
Thanks.
Jeremy Wu
TechNet Community Support

LDAP max simultaneous connections

Hi,
I've got an Ironport C600 6.5.3-007
I set up one LDAP server profile with a maximum number of simultaneous connections of 50.
When I run a netstat command in CLI it appears to have 150 LDAP connexions established to the server.
Do you have any idea on why it doesn't display only 50?
Thank you
Arnaud

I think I've got my answer, actually 3 out of 4 Ironport were still with the version 6.5.0. The one which is in 6.5.3 displays 52 connections.
Here is what I found in the release Note for the 6.5.3 update
Fixed: LDAP Connections Greatly Exceed the Maximum Specified in the LDAP Server Profile
Previously, LDAP connections greatly exceeded the maximum specified in the LDAP server
profile. For example, if you set the maximum LDAP connection to 10, then the system would
open 30 connections: 10 for the IronPort Spam Quarantine, 10 for the end-user quarantine,
and 10 for the end-user quarantine UI. The fix reduced end-user quarantine and end-user
quarantine UI connections to one each. Now, for example, if you set the maximum LDAP
connection to 10, then the system opens only 12 connections: 10 for the IronPort Spam
Quarantine, 1 for the end-user quarantine, and 1 for the end-user quarantine UI. Or if
external authentication is enabled, then the system opens 22 connections: 10 for external

Maximum simultaneous connections for WRT350N

Hi,
What is the maximum number of simultaneous connections that the WRT350N router can handle whilst allowing 1 user to surf the internet?
I need to know this so I can set the maximum number of connections in uTorrent. My upload speed is 1.1 mbps, which is roughly 140 kBps.
The PC has a direct connection to the router, the wireless has been turned off.

There is no such defined number of user for TCP/IP connection.However,you can try to tweak the settings on the application and check if that helps.read this link and this link.

Does the socket implementation suport only 2 simultaneous connections?

Hi all,
I implemented this server the traditional way:
public void run() {
   while(state.isRunning()) {
      try {
         System.out.println("listening...");
         sourceSock = ssock.accept();
         System.out.println("new incoming connection");
         sourceSock.setSoTimeout(config.getHttpTimeout());
         new Thread(new ProxyHttpConnectionWorker(sourceSock, config)).start();
      } catch (IOException _ex) {
         config.out.trace(_ex.getMessage());
}It seems ok to me. I implemented it several times in a lot of situations.
However, this time I noted that after two simultaneous socket connections are opened (via accept()), all other connections I try to make from a client are blocking until one of the first two sockets close().
I mean, it seems to be blocking the incoming connections in the accept() method, because the string "listening..." was printed, but the string "new incoming connection" is only printed when one of the two initial sockets close()
Why is this happening? Is this correct?
I implemented it with J2SE 1.3.1 in a windows NT 4 workstation machine.
Is this an Operating System problem? A TCP/IP problem? Is the problem in the java socket implementation? Is there any flaw in my code?
Thank you all in advance,
Filipe Fedalto

Hi, Chuck
It could also be the case.
Actually, I am implementing a proxy server. All the major work is done and were it not this accept() problem it would be functioning very well.
The server is running in my machine and I am testing it by issuing 4 simultaneous HTTP requests from Internet Explorer 5.5 from my own machine itself. So, you see, this could be the problem, according to what you've just said.
I try to open the 4 browser connections simultaneously, but the servers' accept() method only seems to receive 2 of them at a time.
What do you think about it?
Just in case, I will try and test it using Netscape. Let's see if the number of simultaneous connections change...
Notwithstanding, why do the browsers limit the number of concurrent connections? I might think that this is because it is better to open a single page or two faster than trying to open 5 or 6 pages slowly... is this the point?
Thank you very much!
Filipe Fedalto

Max number of simultaneous connections?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for