MB1C batch automatic determination problem

Dear Friends,
While poisting stock in MB!C for the particular plant and storage location through 561 batch is not determined automatically
for the same material with other plant it is determined automatically
Can you please let me know exact cause to rectify this issue.
Thanks
Raju.

dear friend
this condition is already having. with the key compbination material.
for the same material other plant is working fine. only problem is with Plant
i hope now you understand
Thanks
Raju.

Similar Messages

Automatic batch determination problem in STO- Replenishment delivery

Hi all,
After doing the Stock transport order, in replenishment delievry batches are not getting determined auomatically. I've done all the required settings for automatci batch determination incuing itemcategory determination everything, but then automatic determination is not happening. Please advise.

Goto the Batch Split screen ---> Batch Determination
Check the following:
1) Strategy Analysis - Make sure your batch condition record is being pickedup.
2) Strategy Info - make sure 'selection defined' is checked up. No of batch split should be 999.
3) Selection criteria should pick up the characterstic you have defined for batch determination.

How to automatically determine batch no. of component in Production Order

Hi PP gurus:
I am facing a issue. A finished goods with a raw material which under batch management, what I want is when I release the production order of the finished goods, SAP can automatically determine the batch no. of the raw material according to the presetted rule without hitting the "Batch Determination" button in the component tab.
Who can throw a light to me?
Thank you very much.
Paul

Hi,
To manage the materail in batches first you have to check the batch management indicator during the matreial creation in purchasing view or plandata/stor1 view .
Next you have to set the value of batch entry in MRP-2 view for Determination of batch entry in the production/process order
This indicator refers to the components of an order, not to the finished product to be manufactured. You have the following options:
The batches can be determined when the goods issue is posted.
The batches must be entered in the order before it is released.
The batches must be entered in the order before the goods issue is posted, but not necessarily before the order is released.
If you use pick parts, the batches are determined in the transfer order and then confirmed to the order. If there is no direct link between the transfer order and the production order/process order (for example, with release order parts or crate parts), you must enter the batches in the production order/process order manually.
The batches are determined automatically when the order is released.
Hope clear to you.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Automatic determination of billing date on order related billing

Dear all,
Some background:
We are using resource related billing: create standing sales order with WBS as reference.
Costs are posted to the WBS (serves as a bucket to collect costs).
Whenever needed, the costs on the WBS are billed. This is done via transaction DP91, creating a billing request for the standing sales order which generates a new sales order which takes the amount from the WBS element. This sales order can then be billed.
In other words: Each period, the standing sales order can be billed (based on the WBS element it contains) in a new sales order.
Problem:
The billing date is derived from the 'requested delivery date' on the sales order.
We would like to have by default proposed by the system as billing date: the date when the (2nd) sales order and/or billing document is generated. So either date of billing should be the billing date or the requested delivery date (which will then automatically determine the billing date)
How can this be achieved?
What I tried:
1). I have ticket the flag "Propose delivery date", but this doesn't seem to be the solution.
2). Factory calender is only to be used in case a specific date should be used (e.g. last day of the week/month). I don't think we need this, as we could just go for "todays date" during (2nd) sales order/billing document creation.
3). I checked the copy control properties, but this is not really an option I think.
Many thanks!

HI, Boiler
I suggest you to check the copy control again.
As I known, there is a Routin setting for data transfer (Data VBRK/VBRP) in the item level. And you can use standard routin 11 means Bill. date= Today.
Hope it can help you.
Wink Young

Automatic determination of Region of destin.

Hi experts,
I am facing a problem in the import tab of Purchase order.
How to maintain the <b>Region of destin</b>. to make it automatically determined after the Ctry of origin, Dispatch ctry and Ctry of destin etc have been auto entered? I know it can be manually selected, but fail to know how to make it automatically displayed.
Thanks,
Helen

on the item level of purchase order, for the trade happened in Europe, there would be possibly the tab of import.
in the tab, there are five fields:Ctry of origin, Dispatch ctry, Ctry of destin.,Trading country and Region of destin.. How to make the field <b>Region of destin</b>. auto determined if other four fields have entered auto?
Thanks, (hope it is more clear now)
Helen

We have a requirement where route must be automatically determined in delivery

Hello Folks,
I have requirement in which route must be determined automatically in delivery based of delivery date for example,
If confirmed delivery date is 22/07/2014 then Route A must be determined and if confirmed delivery date is 29/07/2014 then Route B must be selected
Any thoughts?
Regards,
Khawar

Hello Noel,
Thanks for your reply, I really appreciate it.
Actually I misunderstood requirement yesterday, here is the complete detail and hoping you are anybody can help.
When SO gets created system gives us confirmed schedule line and that schedule line date gets forwarded to our Third party carrier through EDI and he arranges transport based on that date.
Now the problem is, suppose Customer Requested Delivery date is 09/07/2014 and confirmed schedule line date is 14/07/2014 because transit time is 5 days.
This 14/07/2014 date will go to carrier and he will arrange transport accordingly but customer is expecting good on 09/07/2014.
Our requirement is:
1) at sales order level if customer expected Price can't be met, system should generate a warning.
2) at delivery level system should automatically determine available route which can help us meet customer requested date and if that date can't met system should put a block on delivery.
Remember we have three types of routes for same connection points from 15 days to 2 days and we want system to pick any one of them or block if not possible.
Regards,
Khawar

ITunes is automatically determining audio volume on my files

Whenever I open iTunes it begins automatically "determining audio volume" for my podcasts. I don't know why it's doing this. When I click on the x in the window it stops, but if I close iTunes and reopen it, it starts again. How can I make iTunes stop doing this permanently?

I have the same problem with automatically "determining song volume" every time I launch iTunes, and it's with over 40 GB of music, a real pain in the neck. I believe it might have something to do with how you import songs from a cd or how you burned a cd and reimport them. If you burn a cd with the "use soundcheck" option, this might be the culprit, but I don't know how to adjust the whole library to forget soundcheck altogether. I tried selecting all tracks, get info, and setting them all to 0 under options for volume adjustment, but that didn't work. Anyone else have any ideas?

Automatic determination support team based on own specs?

Hi,
Rule 13200137 to automatically determines a support team using some standard specs such as:
SAP Component
Catalog Subject
Category
Code Subject
Subject Code Group
Sold-ToParty Country
Transaction Number
Priority
etc...
how can I add other specs? We need to determine the support team based on data specified in the business partner, ie postal code. In other words, our support team depends more on geographical specs, than SAP componenents.
How can I add other specs in this rule? The function CRM_DNO_READ_PARTNER_WFRULE seems quire hard coded, so I was wondering how to do this?
thanks a million,
regards,
maggie

Hi dolores
I have configured service desk and determination of support message team,
Users can change status of service desk message trough B_USERSTAT Authorization object if the Actions are available regarding the ticket status
I like to set conditions, sou2026 if service message are assigned to BASIS TEAM only this group must change service message status or edit service message data
Thereu2019s any way to do this trough authorization objects?? B_USERST_T maybe ? combination of B_USERSTAT & B_USERST_T (activation) ?? Status profiles & Authorization key & transactions types, actions profiles??
Best Regards

Automatic determination of WBS element in MIGO

Dear Friends,
I have a requirement as below:
When we do reservation for a particular WBS element and do goods issue for a different WBS element, system is not giving any error message.
We want to configure automatic determination of WBS element in MIGO_GI from Reservation and the WBS field should be disabled for editing while doing Goods Issue. Please suggest on the required configurations.
Regards,
Deepa

I'm totally agree with Pete.
This info can accelerate search and development
IQSM0007 Customer exit for goods movements
This customer exit is used to transfer the document data for a goods movement into serial number management. This involves:
The complete goods document (transfer table S7_TAB_MSEG, structure MSEG),
The purchase order history (transfer table S7_TAB_EKBE, structure EKBE).
The customer exit is called as soon as the document is saved. This means that at this moment in time the document data can be placed in the global memory of function group XQSM, where it is then available when the serial numbers in the document are saved immediately afterwards.
Access to the document data (placed in the global memory of IE01) is performed in customer exit EXIT_SAPLIE01_005, which can be activated using customer exit IQSM0005.
Certain document data can now be copied into the master data of the serial numbers.
Example
You want to copy the goods recipient from the material document and the value from the purchase order history into the serial number.
Goods movement
You activate the customer exit EXIT_SAPLIE01_007 so that you can prepare the required information from the goods document and the purchase order history. You can read additional data (for example, from the purchase order) where necessary.
Posting
You activate the customer exit EXIT_SAPLIE01_005. The data prepared with user exit EXIT_SAPLIE01_007 is available here (for example, goods recipient or purchase order value). This data can be copied into the master data of the serial numbers.

How to create the Batch Automatically during creation of Production order

Hi All,
I wanted to create the Batch Automatically for the Specific order type during creation.
Not for all order type so OPKP transction will not work for me.
Please suggest any way or user exit any production order.
Thanks,
Amit Shah

Hi All,
Thanks for your inputs.
1. Why we want create the Batch Auto -
      For Std Production Order type we want to generate Batch Automatically.
      For Re-work Production Order type we don't want Batch Created Auto.
      If you have better solution please let me know.
2. Scheduling profile.
      I think I misunderstood your solution.
      You want to say that mainatin the Schd profile in the SPRO with repect to Sub Schdler.
      Already client is maintaining the Schd Profile in the Material Master.
       please correct me if i am wrong.
Thanks,
Amit Shah

F110 and Bank Determination Problem

Hi Expert,
I have problem / question on the bank determination problem on F110, as follows:
My Payment method (PM): N
Ranking order for PM: N is:
Rank 1: House Bank is ... ABMB
Rank 2: ABMB2
Rank 3: ABMB3
Rank 15: MBB
In my F110, at my setting for printout/data medium, variant created (Program: RFFOD__S) for PM:N and for House Bank: MBB (Not ABMB).
Question:
I have vendor open items of PM:N, and when I run the F110 (using the above setting / variant) , why SAP always clear the open items using house bank ABMB, and not MBB? I expect F110 will use house bank MBB, as I set variant for program: RFFOD__S is MBB for PM:N.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Regards,
sbmel

Hi,
Payment program will select house bank from bank determination which you made for your payment method and house bank combination.
The house bank you have entered in payment media program variant is used to generate payment advice or payment media. It has nothing to do with house bank through which you want to make this payment.
For any reason you want to make payments to the vendor using specific house bank you can enter house bank ID directly in vendor master data.
Thanks!
Raju
Edited by: M V Narayana Raju on Sep 14, 2010 5:20 AM

Agent determination problem

I have a workflow that has been in production for almost a year. We are in the middle of integration testing for another rollout and I'm getting agent determination errors in this workflow. There are three steps involved. The first two use the exact same rule. The first of these two works fine. When it tries to run the rule again for the second step, it gets no agent found. If I test the rule it works. If I restart the workflow, it works. When it moves on to the third work item using a different rule, it errors out no agent found. When I test this rule, it works. When I restart at this step, it also works.
This is a new integration client that was copied from production. I've performed the standard workflow customization like I always do. I've run several other workflows and only notice the agent determination problems in this one. The workflow hasn't changed in months although there have been some user security changes...I'm not sure how that could really affect the agent determination during the creation of work items.
One thing that might be important...userA created the first workitem and the agent determination resolves to userB. When userB executes the first work item and completes, the second work item should also resolve to userB using the exact same rule. This fails. I restarted it using my account and it resolves to userB. UserB executes work item #2 and work item #3 should resolve to userC but the agent determation fails again. I don't know whether the work item agent is "used" to perform the creation of the next workitem or not but this is the only difference between the first two work items and one works while the other does not.
It's almost like userA can perform the agent determination but userB cannot. I can't manually execute the agent determination as userB so I ran se37 as myself in debug and changed SYST-UNAME to userB and it worked fine and returned userB as the agent. That would seem to eliminate security as an issue with the agent determination.

Hi,
Are you absolutely sure that it is not an authorisation issue? Can you give SAP_ALL (and the possible structural authorisations) to all the users that are involved in the process? (I don't think that changing sy-uname in debug mode to another user really is a correct way to try to prove whether this is an authorisation issue.)
The agent determination of the following step is executed by the previous WF agent, if there is no background steps between. So if the previous agent doesn't have enought authorisations, the agent determination will fail.
Regards,
Karri

Output device not automatically determined in VF02

Hello gurus,
My default output device is not coming automatically when I add an output type in VF02. This is an issue because output type has requirement 62 set in output procedure, therefore it will not be added until invoice is release to accounting. Futhermore, we have implemented Argentina eletronic invoice, which won't allow to change the invoice once it has been released to accounting. Quite a contradiction. So I'm hoping the output type will be added by condition technique while releasing to accounting, yet i believe since the output device is not being automatically determined in the background, it won't do.
Any ideas?
Thank you very much.
JP

Hello guys,
I had checked all your suggestions before posting this thread, but still the issue remains:
- VV31 condition records are fine but I cannot set a single output device since it will be used for many output devices.
- Analysis was carried in VF02 and the condition is being picked up but since requirement 62 is set in the output procedure, which forces the billing document to be first released to accounting, the condition is being removed:
- Printer is set in the user profile options, but does not come as default in VF02
Thank you all.
Kind regards,
JP

SD: Condition record not getting automatically determined

Hi,
Condition record not getting automatically determined for a condition type for which following access is maintained.
The access has table containing following fields:
Sales Organisation
Distribution Channel
Division
Sales Document type
Sales Document No.
Material no.
Following is the scenario:
A sales order is created for Project Systems attach a WBS element to the line item .
With respect to the above created sales order a Billing request ( a sales doc. type which is different than the above sales order). When the billing request is created materials appearing in the line item will be different.Different materials will appear in the billing request because of the DIP profile maintained.
The prerequisite is that before creating billing request the sales employee has to maintain condition master record with above access.The condition record will combine sales organisation, distribution channel, division, sales document type ,
sales document number ( the 1st refered sales order)
and the material are different
than the ones maintained in the 1st sales order.
This will enable in getting billing request generated without manual intervention in pricing for other materials for which condition records have been maintained as stated above.
Following is the error message we get
===================================
" Inactive X Inactive via formulae of incorrect "
Thanks
Aby
Message was edited by: Aby Jacob Emmanuel

As I know, thats just a warning message(if its a std one).
Ignore it and save.
Check your pricing date of the document. For execution it should be similar or after valid-from date maintain in condition record.
But, you need not create a condition record. Simply change the existing one combination of your desire. But, this warning will come there also for your combination.
Thanks & Regards
JP

How to create check in batch automatically after automatic payment program

Hello
SAP Experts i am getting a issue
how to create check in batch automatically after automatic payment program ( t code is f110)
Thanks & Regards
Narendra.G

Hi Narendra,
Please note the process below for cheque Printing:-
1. The pre requisite for Cheque printing is you have used program RFFOUS_c/or the Z version of this program in FBZP and that you have maintained the form name in the field Form name for Payment medium in FBZP.
2. You have a pre printed stationary on which you want to print and the Program & the form has been modified to print as per this.
3. In F110, you must have assigned the Variant name, which would specify the cheque lot no. and this should exactly match with the current cheque no. in the pre printed stationary.
4. Now, after all this setting, when you run Payment run in F110, then also only the Payment documents are posted but the cheque no.s are not updated in the Payment document no. nor the PAYR table is updated. It is only when you run the Print out tab, that a spool is created in SP01 for cheque printing as per the Payment documents.
5. Then in SP01, you can print the spool on your pre printed stationary.
This is the complete process of printing cheques from F110. Hope this helps..
Regards,
SAPFICO

MB1C batch automatic determination problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for