MDIS Not Picking Up Particular Source Record

I am mapping a CREMDM idoc to a Vendor repository. I added logic to map the EDIDC SNDPRN to a custom field and it works fine in the manual Import Manager. I can even leave the application and come back in and my mappings are all still there and work fine.
If I take the same source file and use MDIS to process it, the new mappings are not taking place. I verified that the map used in the port is the same one I am changing. The Console import report makes it look like the SNDPRN value is null when it comes into the map.
Is there something special I have to do to get such a mapping to work with MDIS?

Hello Keith Wendel
When Import server didn't import data it create error log in inbound directory
For fix import errors you can load import manager select source type as Port
select remote system and port
and check your map for that configuration
Regards
Kanstantsin

Similar Messages

Suggestion for not picking up the same record

Hi All,
I have a plsql procedure that picks up the records from the same table from multiple threads. Different threads should not pick up the same record.
Current Logic:
I am locking the row that has been picked up the current thread and the next thread should pick up the next row but unfortunately i have a problem here, The inner query will pick up the same record until the status of that particular row is changed since I am picking them up in a FIFO order.
I am not able to add the lock row in the inner query since oracle does not support it. Is there any other way to do it simpler?
XXRM_ARM_HEADER
header_id
service_id
XXRM_ARM_LINES
line_id
header_id
status
Query
SELECT dl.header_id, dl.line_id
FROM xxrm_arm_header dh, xxrm_arm_lines dl
WHERE dh.header_id = dl.header_id
AND dh.service_id = 4
AND dl.status = 'REQUEST_RECEIVED'
AND dl.line_id = (SELECT LINE_ID
FROM ( SELECT dl.line_id
FROM xxrm_arm_lines dl,
xxrm_arm_header dh
WHERE dh.header_id = dl.header_id
AND dl.status = 'REQUEST_RECEIVED'
AND dh.service_id = 4
ORDER BY dl.line_id ASC)
WHERE ROWNUM = 1)
FOR UPDATE OF dl.status NOWAIT SKIP LOCKED

Robert Angel wrote:
forgive me if I am naive, but why wouldn't each thread updating its selected rows with a nowait and if exception pick the next range mechanism work?It is not that simple. You can get race conditions between threads as they process the same rows in the same order attempting to "beat" one another by being the first to lock it. The more threads there are, the potentially worse this situation.
There's also the issue of performance. The thread concept (aka parallel processing) in this respect has a single primary aim. Increase performance and scalability. But does it?
How is I/O reduced when 50% or more of the reads done by the thread (to find a row to process) is wasted I/O as rows being read have already been locked by other processes/threads?
The fact remains that if you give the same set of rows to a bunch of threads (e.g. DBMS_JOB processes) for processing, they will contend for the same rows. There will be overheads. There will be wasted I/O.
So what I am suggesting is each thread; -
1. Look for rows unprocessed, I usually use atribute field in e-Business suite for this purpose
2. Attempt to update them with nowait, to INPROCESS
3. If 2 fails, try the next range - repeat until 2 is possible or end of rangeAnd step 3 is the one that will waste I/O and waste time - as the time it spend looking for a row to process could have been spend on actually processing a row.
4. You could also improve this by specialising each thread to have its own preferences, if there exists a mechanism that would mean fair distribution between the threads..Yes, and this is a key factor to removing contention between threads, reducing their I/O overheads and reducing their time being spend on finding unprocessed rows to lock and process.
Then there's Oracle technical issues. On 11gr2 for example, despite using skip locked or nowait (that cannot be used together in a single clause like in 10g), I'm seeing deadlocks when threads contend for the same rows. Same code works fine in 10g without deadlocks. So the approach one chooses need careful testing on that specific Oracle version to ensure it behaves as expected and meets the performance requirements.
Bottom line is that parallel processing is not as straight forward as simply slapping a nowait clause onto a select statement in order to skip locked rows.

File is not picking from the source location.

Hi all,
File is not picking from the source location. FTP is working properly and file is also placed in source location. I am new the XI, if anybody can give me the solution it would be really helpfull.
Thanks to all.
Korean

Hi Majin,
Check the folder path properly, check the file name( file name is case sensitive) you have given correct or not. See that your communication channel is active. Also check the cache status and check adapter status also by that you will come to know wht is the problem.
Thanks,
Ranjeeth.

ODS not picking one particular master data record

Hi All,
Problem is when we run a query on ODS,it is not displaying the one particular data records.Then we check the ods that particular record values are not available,but it is in master data tables.
My question is what will be the reason for this.we are using Generic extraction.
thanks

Hi,
Check for primary keys of master data tables and key fields of ODS . I think there should be mismatch which is why some records are getting overwritten.
Also in the ods request check number of records transfered and number of records added.
ODS key fields should be exactly same as Primary key of master data table otherwise there are chances of loosing data.
Hope that helps.
Regards
Mr Kapadia
Assigning points is the way to say thanks in SDN.

Purchase Order is not Picking Price from Info Record.

Dear All,
User had created a Shopping cart in and an automatic Purchase Order is created which is picking the material price from Purchase Requisition but not from Created Inforecord. As checked in P.R at item level it is found that in VALUATION tab there is a field named as " P.O PRICE " , here defalt t selected as " 1 A Gross Price "., Can u please help that from where this field is automatically selected as Gross Price in Purchase requisition.
Thanx n Rgds,
sap11

This is the config done in the OMET transaction where you will see the Adopt PO price field is checked and now this funcitonal authorization code e.g. 01 assgined to user profile in SU3 transaction agianst the parameter EFB.
if this is active than it will not take price from info record but it will copy from PR.
to avoid this kind of issue -
Remove the EFB value in SU3 for particular user or if user needs to have the EFB profile for some other requirements than go to OMET and remove Adopt po price indicator from that profile which is assigned to user

GOA not picked up as source of supply in R/3 when converting PR to PO

Hi
We are currently using SRM 5.0 extended classic scenario. Here we are using Global outline agreements which will get replicated to backend R/3 system and can be used as source of supply while converting a Purchase requisition to Purchase order. The aim is to use Global outline agreements instead of Info records which will be more flexible.
Once MRP run is done, based on requirement Purchase requisitions are created. Using ME57 we convert the PRs to Purchase orders by assigning source of supply. At this point I would expect the GOA to be picked up,whcih is created against this product. But this is not happening as of now.
Please let me know if there is configuration or prerequisites that need to be done for this.
Also when I am trying to assign the GOA manually in PR, it is throwing the error as 'Item category of contract does not match with Item category in PR', even though both has Item category as 'Standard'.
<< Moderator message - Everyone's problem is important >>
Regards
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Nov 15, 2010 3:15 PM

Hi
GOA is not source of supply Indeed.
whatever you have distributed the GOA as a Purchasing contract is a real source of supply.
if the contract is available in ECC , then it is a valid source of supply for your purchase request.
Can you use the same contract for any other manual / PM /PS purchase request?
Are you assigning same material contract to your purchase request ?
the problem is for only MRP PRs or all PRs.
Muthu

Delta load does not pick up the new records.

Hi All,
My asset has a transaction in the ECC. In BW system for that asset, I have master data that asset posting period is 01/2008. I ran the delta today but my delta does not pic up the asset. what might the problem? how can i go ahead. here the extractor is 0FI_AA_11.
Kiran

Hi ,
first check wether there are any records in rsa3 for that data source ..
Regards,
Shikha

Receiving Open Interface not picking Inter-Org records from Interface

Hi,
I am trying to receive the inter org transfer through the Receiving Open interface, but the interface not picking the data from the interface tables (RCV_HEADERS_INTERFACE, RCV_TRANSACTION_INTERFACE).
I am in 11.5.10.2, all the sources worked fine like Vendor, Internal Order, Customer but the issue is with the Inventory source (inter orgs)
Please could you advise what could be the reason for the interface for not picking the Inventory source data from the interface table.
Below are the interface insert script that am using..
INSERT INTO RCV_HEADERS_INTERFACE
(HEADER_INTERFACE_ID,
GROUP_ID,
PROCESSING_STATUS_CODE,
RECEIPT_SOURCE_CODE,
TRANSACTION_TYPE,
AUTO_TRANSACT_CODE,
LAST_UPDATE_DATE,
LAST_UPDATED_BY,
LAST_UPDATE_LOGIN,
CREATION_DATE,
CREATED_BY,
SHIPMENT_NUM,
RECEIPT_HEADER_ID,
SHIP_TO_ORGANIZATION_ID,
EXPECTED_RECEIPT_DATE,
EMPLOYEE_ID,
VALIDATION_FLAG
VALUES
(rcv_headers_interface_s.nextval , --Header_Interface_Id
rcv_interface_groups_s.nextval, --Group_Id
'PENDING', --Processing_Status_Code
'INVENTORY', --Receipt_Source_Code
'RECEIVE', --Transaction_Type
'DELIVER', --Auto_Transact_Code
SYSDATE, --Last_Update_Date
-1, --Last_Updated_By
-1, --Last_Update_Login
SYSDATE, --Creation_Date
-1, --Created_By
'ICR-001', --SHIPMENT_NUM
21073573, --RECEIPT_HEADER_ID
2266, -- SHIP_TO_ORGANIZATION_ID
SYSDATE+1, --Expected_Receipt_Date
5543, --Employee_Id,
'Y' --Validation_Flag
INSERT INTO RCV_TRANSACTIONS_INTERFACE
(INTERFACE_TRANSACTION_ID,
GROUP_ID,
LAST_UPDATE_DATE,
LAST_UPDATED_BY,
CREATION_DATE,
CREATED_BY,
LAST_UPDATE_LOGIN,
TRANSACTION_TYPE,
TRANSACTION_DATE,
PROCESSING_STATUS_CODE,
PROCESSING_MODE_CODE,
TRANSACTION_STATUS_CODE,
CATEGORY_ID,
QUANTITY,
UNIT_OF_MEASURE,
ITEM_ID,
AUTO_TRANSACT_CODE,
SHIPMENT_HEADER_ID,
SHIPMENT_LINE_ID,
SHIP_TO_LOCATION_ID,
RECEIPT_SOURCE_CODE,
TO_ORGANIZATION_ID,
DESTINATION_TYPE_CODE,
DELIVER_TO_PERSON_ID,
LOCATION_ID,
DELIVER_TO_LOCATION_ID,
SUBINVENTORY,
LOCATOR_ID,
HEADER_INTERFACE_ID,
VALIDATION_FLAG,
SHIPPED_DATE
--SELECT
VALUES
rcv_transactions_interface_s.nextval, --Interface_Transaction_id
rcv_interface_groups_s.currval, --Group_id
SYSDATE, --Last_update_date
-1, --Last_updated_by
SYSDATE, --Creation_date
-1, --Created_by
-1, --Last_update_login
'RECEIVE', --TRANSACTION_TYPE_RECEIVE
SYSDATE, --TRANSACTION_DATE
'PENDING', --PROCESSING_STATUS_CODE
'BATCH', --PROCESSING_MODE_CODE
'PENDING', --TRANSACTION_STATUS_CODE
203, -- CATEGORY_ID
20, --QUANTITY
'EACH', --UNIT_OF_MEASURE
4379131, --ITEM_ID
'DELIVER', --AUTO_TRANSACT_CODE
21073573, --SHIPMENT_HEADER_ID
16566939, --SHIPMENT_LINE_ID
101629781, --SHIP_TO_LOCATION_ID
'INVENTORY', --RECEIPT_SOURCE_CODE
2266, --TO_ORGANIZATION_ID
'INVENTORY', --DESTINATION_TYPE_CODE
13706, --DELIVER_TO_PERSON_ID
101629781, --LOCATION_ID
101629781, --DELIVER_TO_LOCATION_ID
'FG', --SUBINVENTORY
46259, --LOCATOR_ID
rcv_headers_interface_s.currval, --Header_interface_id
'Y', --VALIDATION_FLAG
SYSDATE
Thank you,
Genoo
Edited by: Geno on May 25, 2013 4:54 AM

Any suggestion/advise please!
Thanks,
Genoo

PO having Item Category u0091Pu0092 or u0091Qu0092 price not picking from Condition Record

Hi Guru,
Purchase order having Item Category P or Q Price should pick from the condition type.
Where my condition type against on material and WBS based on this Price will be fixed.
Now I create the PO for same, which the price was not picking from the Condition Record.
Please help on this.
Thanks
Muthukumar

The condition record was created and is being picked up in the calculation. Also, I am now testing with a material that does not have a PIR created, so the PIR does have an impact on my current results.
My current test has results as follows: condition P101 = Std. Cost (as expect) $100.00; ZUPP = calculated at 5% (as expected) $105.00. However, the Net Price in the PO line item is showing only $100.00, not the $105.00.
A look at table EKPO shows the following: Net Price (NETPR) $100.00; Net Value (NETWR) $100.00 ; Gross Value (BRTWR) $105.00.
Can you tell me what I am missing with this setup?

Fixed Vendor in Source List not picking in MRP proposals

Dear All
For a matrial, we have maintained two Contracts as Sources in Sourcelist. Both sources are valid and MRP relevant(MRPindicator 1 in Source list)
We then fixed the second Source ( fix indicator in second line in Source List)
Then Run MRP. The expectation was that the second source will be picked as its fixed. But the MRP proposed Purchase Requstion and Planned orders are picking the first source only (non fixed one)
Wanted to to clarify whether the fix source indicator does not have any relevance during MRP ? OR is it some other problem?
Please let me know your thoughts on this.
Regards
Shyam

Hello
As already mentioned by Jürgen, the indicator 'Fixed source of supply' is not considered by MRP at all.
See the following note which explains that in more detail:
110074
MRP: Source of supply, several valid source list records
Therefore, please make sure that there is only one source list item relevant to MRP.
BR
Caetano

Exclude Matches between records from a Particular Source system EDQ+Siebel UCM

I have a requirement to modify the EDQ-CDS Individual Match processor.
I want to exclude the match between two records (Driver and Candidate) if they have same value in a particular field and i want the Value to be hard-coded or specified as reference Data in EDQ (eg: if both driver and candidate are from same source say 'Source ABC' only then NO MATCH , for all other source records match should happen).
We tried adding Match rule which does the 'Exact Match' comparison on the field 'source' and set the rule to 'NO MATCH' , but this is excluding the matching between records from any system, which is not my requirement. I am only looking to exclude the match when the Source value is say 'Source ABC'.
I think it should be possible with the Comparison type 'In Value' or 'In List ' or 'All in List'. But not sure who to use these comparison rules and there is not much documentation available EDQ online.
Any help on this appreciated.
We are on Siebel 8.2.2.4 + EDQ 11.1.1.7 on Solaris 64 bit.

In List is documented in the 12.1.3 online help. Before this, it was an extension to the product used by CDS.
It is very straight-forward. You add it as a comparison, and create a reference data set with your list of values in it. If the identifier value hits the list, the comparison evaluates to true.
I've pasted most of the help from 12.1.3 below:
Comparison: In List
The In List comparison provides a way of making the application of a Match rule conditional on one or both identifier values in a comparison being matched with a single value or list of values.
Use
Use this comparison as a way to apply a Match rule only to a subset of the data in the Match process. For example:
Where a Match rule is designed to match Middle Eastern names, only apply it if a Country identifier matches a list of Middle Eastern countries.
Where a Match rule is designed to match Electronic products, only apply it if a Product Category identifier matches a single value.
The comparison may also be used to eliminate matches that would otherwise be caught by Match rules lower in the decision table, if used in a Match rule with a 'No Match' result; for example, so that matches on certain rules are only presented if Country or Nationality values are not in a list of safe values.
Options
Option
Type
Purpose
Default Value
Require data in both records?
Yes/No
If Yes, both input identifier values must contain data. If they do not, the comparison will always be 'False'.
If No, only one input identifier value must contain data.
No
Match whole value?
Yes/No
If Yes, the whole identifier value (or values) specified must match.
If No, tokens within the identifier will be matched against the list. In this case, delimiters must be specified in the relevant fields below to determine how to split tokens.
No
Required value reference data
Reference Data
A Reference Data set with a list of values, for example a set of country codes.
Clear
Required value
Free text
A single value to match against. Note that if a Reference Data set and a value is specified, both are matched against.
Clear
Require match for all values?
Yes/No
If Yes, all tokens in the identifier value(s) must match against the required list or value.
If No, any one of the tokens must match.
This option is only used if Match whole value? is set to "No".
No
Delimiter characters reference data
Free text or browse
A Reference Data set with a list of delimiter characters used to tokenize identifier values before matching against the list.
This option is only used if Match whole value? is set to "No".
None
Delimiter characters
Free text
This field is used to specify the delimiter characters to use as an alternative to linking to a Reference Data set.
This option is only used if Match whole value? is set to "No".
Note: If a Reference Data list of delimiters and specific characters are entered here, both are considered delimiter characters.
None

Garageband is not picking sound from builtin mic (rMBP). I recorded some tracks, now it is not working. All other apps can use the mic. Monitoring is switched ON at GB, it picks sound only some other app, eg. Skype, is used to access the mic.

Garageband is not picking sound from builtin mic (rMBP).
I recorded some tracks, now it is not working. I have checked GB Preferences, Audio/MIDI > Audio Input > Built In Microphone.
All other apps can use the mic. Dictation, Skype etc. can use the mic!
Monitoring is switched ON at GB, it picks sound only some other app, eg. Skype, is used to access the mic.
Can any one help me, Please!
Many thanks!

I have foud the solution - rather stupid. The system setting for audio input was at 70%, increasing it to 100% solves the problem!

PO not picking up the Price from Info Record ???

Hi,
Pricing Procedure and the Schema Grp is defined in Schema Determination in SPRO.
Schema Grp has been assigned in the Vendor Master.
Price has been maintained in the PB00 condition type in the Condition Supplements screen, but shows 'Zero' in the 'Purchasing Org. Data 1' screen of Info Record.
However, while creating PO the system does not pick up the Price from the Info Record and both the Condition Types PB00 and PBXX appears and display the Amount as 0.00 ? Also the system does not take the value entered in the 'Net Price' field and the Price can only be entered manually in the Conditon Type in the Conditions Tab ?
Can anyone help in resolving this issue ?
Lucky.

Hi Lucky
1.Routine 6
This is an example of a pricing requirement. This requirement is met if the condition exclusion indicator is not equal to 'X'. <b>This requirement can be assigned to a condition type in the pricing procedure to ensure that it is not accessed when a condition record with exclusion indicator 'X' has already been found</b>. Condition exclusion is a general tool that can be used to exclude conditions from pricing based on previous conditions that have been found in the pricing procedure. This requirement is intended for use in MM pricing versus SD pricing. For SD pricing, a variation of requirement '2' should be used which would also check to see if the item category is relevant for pricing
2. You have define all your supplementory condition in supplementory pricing procedure and you have to assign this supplementory procedure to your Condition type PB00.Then all these conditions will be displayed at item level for selection in drop down.
Since the supplementory conditions are dependent on PB00, you have assign to the PB00.
If you maintain the values for these conditions in info record, these values will be copied from info to PO.
Regards
Ramakrishna

PO not picking Purchasing org from info record

Hi All,
While creating PO system is not picking Purchasing org??? Rest capturing everything whatever is maintianed.
Please tell me the solution
Rgrds
SS
Edited by: SunilSisodia on Dec 14, 2011 8:59 PM

Hi,
Info record is combination of plant,material and vendor master record,all data from MMR and Vendor get copied into Info record which flow IN PO while creating PO,
when we enter vendor code and material master in PO then info-records come in PO
check following like also
[Info Record: Plant Vs Purchasing Org Level;
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/75/ee102f55c811d189900000e8322d00/content.htm]
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Net price not picking from info record

I am creating a new PO, but net price is not picking from info record. Info record is getting copied in the line item for PO, but net price is not copied. Due to that I am unable to create PO. If I manually enter price PO can be created. Could someone tell me what might be the reason Price is not automatically taken from Info Record. Please guide me what all I need to check.
The same data is working in one cleint, and in another client this data is facing problem.
Thanks
Vineeth

Hi
1) If there is condition record exit in system,then while creating po system will take condition record
2) If In inforecord last po number is exist for material and vendor ,then system will take this into consideration
3) if your creating po first time for material and vendor ,and we have maintain purchasing inforecord for purchasing organization and for plant,then system will take it into consideration
40 If none is available we have to put condition manually in po
Regards
Kailas ugale

MDIS Not Picking Up Particular Source Record

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for