MDN sigend - Negative synchron

Hi,
We are sending an outbound EDI message to an AS2 receiver with HTTPS protocol. However we get a message u201CFatal exception: javax.resource.ResourceException: SEEBURGER AS2: Negative synchron MDN received., SEEBURGER AS2: Negative synchron MDN received.u201D. The message is getting delivered but there is a fatal exception in the AS2 receiver adapter. However if I remove the sign MDN option in the receiver channel, then the seeburger workbench has a status u201CAll reports OKu201D but the receiver needs a signed MDN. Any help is appreciated.
Teresa

Hi,
Any ideas? I have set up the MDN sign and also the inbound MDN interface with a sender comm channel and sender agreement. The message subject in MDN part of the AS2 receiver and the sender have been maintained the same. Anything that I missed?
Teresa

Similar Messages

Synchronous AS2 - MDN communication

Hello,
in our AS2 scenario (SAP Proxy Sender --> BPM --> AS2 Receiver) we request the MDN synchronously for error handling purposes, associating the message directly to the sender message and direct update of the sender system.
However problem is that obviously only asynchronous interfaces can be used to communicate with the AS2 adapter. So even though the MDN is requested synchronously (as http response) I cannot use a synchronous interface.
Has anyone of you used such a synchronous scenario? How did you overcome the problem that a synchronous interface obvisouly cannot be used?
Thank you for your update!

hello all,
Now i am facing the below error:
Message processing failed. Cause: javax.resource.ResourceException: Fatal exception: javax.resource.ResourceException: SEEBURGER AS2: AS2 Adapter failure # Outbound configuration error: Failed to get configuration from DATABASE. MDN requested, but AS2 Inbound Relation is missing. Missing inbound relation between AS2From: 'XXXX' and AS2To: 'YYYYY'., SEEBURGER AS2: AS2 Adapter failure # Outbound configuration error: Failed to get configuration from DATABASE. MDN requested, but AS2 Inbound Relation is missing. Missing inbound relation between AS2From: 'XXXXX' and AS2To: 'YYYYY'.
Eventhough i have maintained proper relation between Sender and recevier external party AS2ID.
Could you please help on this.

Seeburger Adapter: Party for AS2 - Synchronous MDN

Hello, I have to AS2 related questions:
1. We send a message via sender proxy which then has to be sent to an AS2 receiver. According to the documentation that I have a Party has to be created for applying AS2 IDs.
I have created a party for the external AS2 receiver, but should I also configure a Party for the internal SAP system, that sends the message via proxy? We already have a business system with communication channel configured for the proxy sender, so I am wondering whether I have to set up an additional party and use a business service for the SAP system? Any advice on that_
2. In between I also use an integration process, because apart from MDN we get two more AS2 messages used as acknowledgment that have to be correlated to the original message.
Now I am wondering how I can correlate a MDN in the integration process? I request the MDN synchronously however I doubt that I can use a synchronous interface as I have to set up a separate MDN sender even though the MDN is requested synchronously. Do you have any experience in dealing with such scenarios?
Thank you very much.
Regards,
Florian

Hi,
>>1. We send a message via sender proxy which then has to be sent to an AS2 receiver. According to the documentation that I have a Party has to be created for applying AS2 IDs.
I have created a party for the external AS2 receiver, but should I also configure a Party for the internal SAP system, that sends the message via proxy? We already have a business system with communication channel configured for the proxy sender, so I am wondering whether I have to set up an additional party and use a business service for the SAP system? Any advice on that_
No you don't need sender Party. But while creating the receiver Agreement overwrite the Sender Party with you company Identifier (so that receiver can identify teh source of the message)
>>In between I also use an integration process, because apart from MDN we get two more AS2 messages used as acknowledgment that have to be correlated to the original message.
Now I am wondering how I can correlate a MDN in the integration process? I request the MDN synchronously however I doubt that I can use a synchronous interface as I have to set up a separate MDN sender even though the MDN is requested synchronously. Do you have any experience in dealing with such scenarios?
Sorry never worked on this. But will MDN have any detail for you to correlate!!!!?
Regards
Suraj

Seeburger AS2 Adapter: "MDN not signed"

Dear all,
we just updated our test system from XI 3.0 to PI 7.1. Now we are facing a problem with our Seeburger AS2 Adapter.
I sent out a message via AS2 and get the follwing error message in Seeburger AS2 Monitor:
"MDN not signed"
In the Receiver Communication Channel I checked the Option "Sign MDN". In XI 3.0 this Scenario was working perfectly. So I contacted our communication partner and asked them if our AS2 message really contained a request for a signed MDN. Our commnucation partner confirmed and sent the MDN as text file to me. This text file shows that the MDN is signed. So it seems that the Seeburger AS2 adapter does not notice that the received MDN is a signed one. But why? Do you have an idea?
Just for testing purposes I unchecked the "Signe MDN" option. In this case the transmission finished successfully.
Who can help?
Thanks
Michael

Dear Vikrant,
many thanks for your reply. But I am not sure if we are really facing the same issue as you described it in your article.
Currently we have this situation:
When I send out a message the Seeburge Workbench provides only the following error message:
"MDN not signed"
Via the Recovery Monitor I can check the received MDN. Here I can see that the MDN is signed and positive.
In the Runtime Workbench I checked the following:
1. In the Message Monitor (Adapter engine) the message is in status "System Error". Here are the details:
Message could not be forwarded to the JCA adapter. Reason: Fatal exception: javax.resource.ResourceException: SEEBURGER AS2: Negative synchron MDN received., SEEBURGER AS2: Negative synchron MDN received.
Adapter Framework caught exception: Fatal exception: javax.resource.ResourceException: SEEBURGER AS2: Negative synchron MDN received., SEEBURGER AS2: Negative synchron MDN received.
Delivering the message to the application using connection AS2_http://seeburger.com/xi failed, due to: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: javax.resource.ResourceException: Fatal exception: javax.resource.ResourceException: SEEBURGER AS2: Negative synchron MDN received., SEEBURGER AS2: Negative synchron MDN received..
2. The Communication Channel Monitor shows the following error messages:
Error type: REPORT_ERROR >> Error date: 12/14/10 12:02 PM >> Description: MDN not signed [12/14/10 12:02 PM]
Message processing failed. Cause: javax.resource.ResourceException: Fatal exception: javax.resource.ResourceException: SEEBURGER AS2: Negative synchron MDN received., SEEBURGER AS2: Negative synchron MDN received.
I do not understand why the MDN is recognized as negative and unsigned even if the plain text version of the MDN shows that it is signed and positive.
In your article you recommend to create a sender communication channel for MDN and a corresponding sender agreement. We already did that in XI 3.0 to forward the MDN as STATUS IDOC to SAP ECC.
Maybe you have an additional idea?
Thanks
Michaek

AS2 MDN Structure - Details

Hi all,
I have an scenario IDOC->PI->AS2. when we send to the Partner via AS2 they sent us back a Synchronous MDN, but we don't process it yet.
I want to build an interface to process the MDN for bussiness to check if the Invoice they sent was received succesfully on partner side.
My question is:
Which information come into the MDN XML? i just identify the below fields in the message monitor of Seeburger:
Type                           sync
MDN Message ID        <xxxx@xxxx>
Partner ID                    xxxxx
Payload State             ok
Payload State Details <empty>
MDN Timestamp         09/01/2011 00:00:26
MDN Sigend
Own ID                       XXXXX
The MDN Message ID is not the same we use for the invoice, so we cant match the messages.
I want to build something like this:
Associate the Invoice# with the AS2 Message ID or PI Message ID in a table, then with the information received in the MDN complete the match, and give a "Received by partner" status to the invoice.
Maybe the MDN contains more information to complete that match.
Please help.
Regards.

Hi Israel Toledo,
Just wanted to check with if you were able to figure out this?
Regards,
BRV.

MDN not authenticated

Hi All,
Good day.
I searched and read the forums for "MDN not authenticated" error but it seems that our issue is quite different.
The scenario is that we have a trading partner wherein we are sending PDF files to them via AS2. The trading partner is receiving the PDF files but we are having a "MDN not authenticated" error in Seeburger.
The connection is working before as expected until we introduced another trading partner with similar AS2 ID as the first partner with only difference of capitalization.
For the first partner, Party configuration is XIPARTY "PARTNER1" and AS2 ID "PARTNER".
For the second partner, Party configuration is XIPARTY "PARTNER2" and AS2 ID "Partner".
Since the introduction of PARTNER2, messages for PARTNER1 are showing "MDN not authenticated" in Seeburger but PARTNER1 is still receiving the files. We also noticed that the Seeburger logs of PARTNER1 uses the AS2 ID of PARTNER2 which is "Partner".
Sample logs:
Adapter engine logs of PARTNER1:
Status Successful
Repeatable No
Cancelable No
Error Category
Error Code
Start 03.11.2011 02:24:08.139
End 03.11.2011 02:24:08.956
Sender Party
Sender Component Source
Receiver Party PARTNER1
(http://sap.com/xi/XI,XIParty)
Receiver Component AS2_Service
Interface
PDF_Invoice_IB
Service Definition
Software Component
Application Component
Business Message
Quality of Service Exactly Once
Message Format XI Message
Message ID 4eb1235f-f5ea-08f0-e100-8000913742f8
Seeburger logs for PARTNER1:
Message ID
Correlation ID 4eb1235f-f5ea-08f0-e100-8000913742f8
Sender AS2 ID Source
Receiver AS2 ID Partner
State Error on send, will not be retried
Status Description MDN not authenticated - Error while loading authentication certificate: Certficate alias is empty
Timestamp 11/03/2011 02:24:08
Content Type application/pdf
MIC gtjVHVilERCjoXysyuH2QWigHhY=
Message Subject INDRA PDF attachment
Receipt requested async
Encrypted
Direction SENT
Logical System 000
Compressed
Signed
Receipt (MDN) details
Type async
MDN Message ID
Partner ID Partner
Payload State ok
Payload State Details <empty>
MDN Timestamp 11/03/2011 02:24:11
MDN Sigend
Own ID 8712423000339
Anyone who could help us with this issue?
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: Carlo Borja on Nov 3, 2011 5:24 AM

Hello,
in PI, you usually setup
- 1 Party with your own AS2 ID /which will be used to communicate with all partners)
- 1 Party for each of your partners that want to communicate via AS2
=> so if you communicate with 2 Partners via AS2, you have a total of 3 Parties (1 own and 2 partner IDs) setup in your PI
Each party that you setup to identify your EDI-Partners should have an own unique AS2-ID that they usually provide to you when you exchange your AS2-parameters (and I am wondering why someone would identify themselves with an ID "PARTNER" or "Partner"....
If this is a test-scenario and you have defined the AS2-IDs also for your "partners" in that scenario, I would also not recommend to use the same IDs (even if they are different with the capital letters)... it just might lead to confusion...
Greetings

AS2 and Trading Partner Identification for MDN

Hi,
I have a scenario where I have multiple Trading Partners that all use the same hub provider. I have setup the trading partners individually in B2B so the trading partner can be identified regardless of the transport server endpoint.
For inbound documents I use the 'Identifying XPATH Expression" and "Identification Value" to override the default Document Definition so I can see which Trading Partner the Invoice is from, regardless of the hub provider that sent it. This is working fine.
However, when sending outbound documents such as a Purchase Order the ourbound document is shown correctly :-
HealthCorporateNetworkWA BBraunAustraliaPtyLtd AS2 - 1.1 GS1_MultishipmentOrder_Doc - 2.5 GS1_MultishipmentOrder_Action Complete 30 March 2009 10:07:54
Whereas when the MDN is returned it is identified as another trading partner :-
BaxterHealthcarePtyLtd HealthCorporateNetworkWA AS2 - 1.1 GS1_MultishipmentOrder_Doc - 2.5 Acknowledgement Complete 30 March 2009 10:07:59
These are 2 seperate agreements that are deployed and I assume that the b2b instance is simply identifying the appropriate Trading Partner Agreement by the AS2 Identifier only ?
Is there anyway to modify this behaviour ? Obviously I want it to indicate that the MDN is coming from the Trading Partner I sent the PO to ? If I got the hub provider to apply a AS2 Custom Header would I be able to use this instead by adding a new Trading Partner Identification Type and then using that as the identifier in the TP Agreement ?
Given the MDN is a synchronous response, why isnt it associated with the same TP Agreement ?
Any ideas ?

You are using custom over AS2 business protocol where in the identification of trading partner can only be based
on the Exchange which is by AS2 identifier. The identification of Agreement is happening in the document layer which is nothing to do with whether the Acknowledgement is Sync/Async.
Ideally you should create the agreement between host and hub provider

Query on Receiver as2 adapter

Hi team,
i am working on idoc to As2 interface.
how to work with MDN s at receiver side AS2 adapter?
any differences between asynchronous MDN settings and Synchronous mdn settings at receiver as2 adapter.
if difference are there could you please let me know.what are the differences?
Regards
Sachin

Hi Experts,
any inputs please
Regards
Sachin

How to configure alerts for sender AS2 reports channel?

Hi,
We have configured sender AS2 reports channel to receive MDN back from our partner. Scenario is working fine and we are receiving MDN. How does "Enable alerts" option under Alerts Settings in Sender AS2 Reports channel work?
I see following options, but dont know how to trigger an alert when we dont receive successful MDN back:
Negative transmissionreport alert
Negative delivery report alert
Negative receipt report alert
Has anyone trigger any kind of alrert and route them to an email for negative mdn?
Regards,
Riya Patil

Hi Riya,
I tried to use 'Enable alerts' option,but it didn't work.
Please let me know if you get a success in this.
Thanks.
Regards,
Shweta

AS2: Synchronous MDN request but no synchronous interface possible?

Hello,
in our AS2 scenario with the Seeburger Adapter we request the MDN synchronously and we also would like to use a synchronous interface for this.
But obvisouly this is not possible as you have to create a separate sender communication channel for reports and a sender agreement (where I have to use an outbound or abs interface).
Is there really no way to use a synchronous interface for that scenario as we need to get the response back synchronously for handling in integration server.
Thank you for your advice!

So basically my idea was to use a synchronous send step in the integration process and then call a proxy when we have received the MDN.
Even when you use sync MDN with report protocol, you can send message to Integration Engine and process further. You should be able to use this message in BPM also and then it could be sent to receiver proxy.
the SAP sender wants to be notified in case there was a transmission problem and this can only be handled automatically with a synchronous interface.
If you are already using BPM in your scenario, then use of sync scenario is no longer a limitation. You can try correlating the MDN with the AS2 request message.
Regards,
Prateek

Seeburger AS2 - Negative MDN response.

Hi ,
I created a self-signed certificate (signing & encryption) in cyclone and uploaded it in XI. I passed some messages via cyclone to Seeburger AS2 adapter which is being configured in SAP XI.
The payload was delivered from cyclone end but the receipt (MDN) obtained was a negative response.
Error Message: Receipt response: Receiver reported that the signing certificate is not trusted
is it possible in XI (configuration) to make the certificate trusted?
Help needed!

Hi,
To avoid this error you need to follow the below steps.
1. Upload the Cyclone certificate in the Visual Admin. Path of the certificate is TRUSTED\XXX
2. If SAP XI is also encrypting messages with any certificate then you need to upload the same in Visual Admin in path TRUSTED\service_ssl\XXX
3. Provide the same path in Security Settings of the Sender/ Receiver Aggrement
Cheers!
Ram

Correlate MDN to AS2 message using an integration process

Hello,
I had a similar question in a previous thread but closed it as the problem might have not been to clear.
Problem is that we have to use BPM for an AS2 scenario and correlate the MDN back to the process as we need BPM functionalities such as error handling and time-outs as well as some data enrichment.
Problem is even when I request the MDN synchronously on Adapter Level it is delivered as asynchronous message back. So I need to figure out how to correlate it.
MDN contains the messageID so I tried to use the messageID of the original message as correlation. However problem is that a new message ID is assigned when the message is sent by the integration process and the second on is used then as ID in the MDN.
It seems to me that it is therefore not possible at alle to correlate the MDN? However this is a definitive requirement so I am really stuck at the moment.
Do you have any idea?
Thank you very much!

Hello,
well, actually the correlation itself would work as I extract the messageID in a transformation step and then activate the correlation in a send step.
If I check the flag "Refer MDN to XI" in AS2 receiver channel the MDN is delivered back to the integration server and the original messageID is then part of the MDN message payload.
However, and that is the big problem, the MDN uses the second messageID that is created when sending the message from the integration process (and not the first one when the message is sent from sender and process by the integration process).

Process transiente negative Acks in BPM

Hello @all
I am currently working on a JDBC->BPM->R/3(IDoc) Szenario. Within the send-step in the BPM I am requesting an application acknowledgement. On the R/3 backend the ALE AUDIT is configured an working well. Since it is known that only permanent positive/negative acknowledgements are supported by the BPE for Exception handling I have to find an alternative.
What I want is to create an alert when an IDoc status is received which creates even just a temporary negativ acknowledgement that a user can check the idoc inbound processing.
Anyone has an idea for a workaround aside the following one?
Custom processing for ALEAUD01 messages ??
Thanks in advance
Karoline
Custom processing for ALEAUD01 messages ??

we need to know if the message is successfully process or not, if not, we need to get the detail info which is returned in
the acknowledgement message
One way to have the above requirement done is make the process synchronous (if RFC/ Proxy). The response message should contain the state of processing of the message inside SAP....now in the BPM make a check on the response message to see if it is a success or failure....you can apply logic like is success terminate the BPM without any alert.....if failure raise an alert/ send a mail.
Regards,
Abhishek.

Can I handle the outgoing AS2 MDN in a sync fashion ?

... before they are returned to the partner using the same http connection ?
As per the guide, it tells me there is no subscription to the messagebox. I need to capture the outgoing sync mdn before it is sent to the partner (connected to a request-response port), pretty much as we are doing so today with the outgoing async mdns.
Fabrikam will send us a message, the receive pipeline will validate, I need to handle the mdn resolution just before it goes back throught the as2 send pipeline. Is this possible ?

Hi René,
Not tried it personally but I hope you can. I am not sure whether you can edit the disposition. But handle it like access it context properties etc.
Give it a go..
In case of synchronous mode, the MDN will
generated by the AS2 Decoder in the AS2Receive receive pipeline. You will get
MDN message (if enabled) as well as payload message
after the disassemble stage. Here (may be in party resolution stage) you can create a custom pipeline component to handle the MDN as per your requirement. At this stage you will have both the
MDN and AS2 message-payload, so you have to differentiate whether it’s a MDN or payload by the following code:
if (!(bool)inmsg.Context.Read("IsAS2PayloadMessage", "http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2006/as2-properties"))
//Then this is a MDN not a AS2-Payload message
//Handle the MDN here..
Once the MDN has been generated (after you handle it), AS2 Encoder of AS2 Send pipeline
acts as a passthrough pipeline and route the MDN.
Refer
this BizTalk Hotrod magazine and check the “Custom Pipeline Component for Promoting Properties” section where the
author handle the payload where as in your case you have to handle the MDN.
Regards,
M.R.ASHWINPRABHU
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Photos on PDF file print in NEGATIVE

Twice in the past 2 weeks, creating PDF files from 2 different (Quark) documents, ALL THE (TIF) PHOTOS WERE PRINTING IN REVERSE (NEGATIVE)... On MY printer they were printing OK, but when sent to a 3rd party -- they keep printing reversed... Only the photos, not the whole page...
I use a script creating a PS file that converts to PDF via Distiller 7.0.
One incident was a full page ad, using Distiller's PDFX1a2001(1) (or maybe it was PDF/X-1a:2001, don't remember, is there a difference?)... The ad was published in the newspaper with all the photos in negative..... The pre-press guy at the newspaper couldn't figure it out...
The other was a newsletter, converted via Distiller's "Smallest File Size" --- the client called me this morning telling me all the photos show up reversed....
...This strange behavior is intermittent, it happened 2 weeks ago, and then today again, but none in-between and it never happened before.
I Google this issue, and noticed this has been mentioned in some forums in the past (even 2003), but no answers showing...
...Any idea would be greatly appreciated....

I am not sure if foreground works for you:
CALL METHOD cl_gui_frontend_services=>execute
EXPORTING
* document = lv_dir
application = 'AcroRd32.exe'
parameter = '/p /h <path>.pdf' "P = Print, h = Hide Window
minimized = 'X'
* synchronous = ' '
operation = ''
EXCEPTIONS
cntl_error = 1
error_no_gui = 2
bad_parameter = 3
file_not_found = 4
path_not_found = 5
file_extension_unknown = 6
error_execute_failed = 7
synchronous_failed = 8
not_supported_by_gui = 9
OTHERS = 10 .
Print PDF file from Desk top

MDN sigend - Negative synchron

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for