MDT Deployment share and SQL Share on different servers

Hello Technet,
I would like help to figure out how to deal with my MDT Deployment share being on a different server than my SQL Share. I am trying to use the MDT Database in MDT 2013 and SQL Server Express 2014. My deployment share is located on a Linux File Server share,
and my MDT Server and SQL Express Server are located on the same Windows Server 2012 VM.My Bootstrap.ini therefore looks like this:
[Settings]
Priority=Default
[Default]
SkipBDDWelcome=YES
DeployRoot=\\192.168.1.10\DeploymentShare$
UserID=user
UserPassword=password
my Customsettings looks like this:
[Settings]
Priority=CSettings, CPackages, CApps, CAdmins, CRoles, Locations, LSettings, LPackages, LApps, LAdmins, LRoles, MMSettings, MMPackages, MMApps, MMAdmins, MMRoles, RSettings, RPackages, RApps, RAdmins, TaskSequenceID,Default
[Default]
CaptureOS=YES
[CSettings]
SQLServer=SQLServer
Instance=SQLEXPRESS
Database=MDT
Netlib=DBNMPNTW
SQLShare=Logs
Table=ComputerSettings
Parameters=UUID, AssetTag, SerialNumber, MacAddress
ParameterCondition=OR
Therefore, the problem is that during winPE Bootup, WinPE connects to the deploymentshare using the provided credentials just fine, and tries to process customsettings. However, I can map a network drive to the SQL Share as seen in the logs by the following
errors:
1.ERROR-Unable to map a network drive to \\SQLServer\Logs
2. ZTI Error opening SQL Connection:[DBNETLIB][ConnectionOpen(Connect()).]SQL Server does not exist or access is denied.
3.Unable to establish database connection using [CAPPS] properties.
In WinPE, as soon as I hot F8, and use net use \\SQLServer\Logs, the deployment works fine and the properties are read from the database during each section process..
Why is MDT Unable to map the \\SQLServer\Logs , and it requires the manual use of net use? Must I move the deployment share to the same server as my SQL Server Server? Thanks so much.

Should work, Don't know why it's failing.
Can you post your full bdd.log file to a public site like OneDrive and share the link?
There are some inconsistencies with your written summary above.
Keith Garner - Principal Consultant [owner] -
http://DeploymentLive.com

Similar Messages

Differences between consolidation with Direct share and Group share?

Dear all,
I am new in consolidation of investments.
Example illustrated from SAP help directory showed that the amount of goodwill arises from acquisition with direct shares will be more, Why?
In what circumstances acquisitions with direct share is used instead of Group share?
Thanks.
Regards,
Renee

Direct shares and Group shares:
The group share and minority share of investments and equity in acquisitions of an investee unit are evaluated on the basis of the current percentages of ownership.
· Acquisitions with direct shares (used in U.S. GAAP statements)
· Acquisitions with groups shares (used in German HGB statements).
If acquisitions are calculated on the basis of direct shares, only investment paths between the immediate upper units and the investee unit are taken into account; group shares of the remaining upper units are not taken into account.
The entire ownership grid is taken into account when using acquisitions with group shares. The group share in the investee unit results from taking into account all investment paths that lead from the parent units of the consolidation group to the investee unit.

How to deploy sharepoint central administration 2013 in different servers

I want to deploy sharepoint central administration 2013 in different servers, So if one service is down in sever. It is up in other server.
How I can achieve this.
Thanks,
Siva

Yes.
http://www.mssharepointtips.com/tip.asp?id=1006
http://blog.fpweb.net/how-to-run-sharepoint-central-admin-on-two-servers/#.VLSH_CuUeIU
Thanks, Ashish | Please mark a post helpful/answer if it is helpful or answer your query.

Deployment Server and Essbase Server on different boxes

Hi,We're currently testing Hyperion Essbase 7.1.2 and we were wondering if it was possible to have the Essbase (Analytic) Server on one machine and Deployment Server on a different one. At first sight, it seemed so, so we did just that.Now, we'd like to test our setup by signing on through the ESS command line prompt (on the Deployment Server machine) but seem to miss something since the connection ("signon") is refused. The funny thing is that on the machine on which the Essbase Server is installed, we've also installed the Administration Services: through the Administration Console, we can indeed connect to the Deployment Server and interact with it.So my first question is: is our setup possible (that is, having the Deployment and Essbase servers on distinct boxes)?If so, what is the meaning of all the parameters needed for the "signon" command of the ESS command line prompt?Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.Thanks,A. Lepage

I am running Essbase on one Windows server and EAS, EDS, ESS, and EIS on another. Did you create the Analytic Server in EDS and then Sync Security?

NAS storage - share the space between 2 different servers ?

I have 2 - Solaris 10 servers. One of the servers has a 150GB NAS attached storage that is mounted using NFS.
I would like my other server to be able to see and utilize the storage. Is there a way I can do that using NFS in the /etc/vfstab or would I need to set something up like Samba ?

If the first server has it NFS mounted, why don't you just repeat that on the second server?
You can either hard-mount it at boot in the vfstab or set up an automounter entry.
Darren

Can you file share AND connection share simultaneously?

I'm sharing my iMac's internet connection over AirPort to a pair of MacBooks. While the internet connection is working fine, I've not been able to access my iMac's files through file sharing. I thought this may be because the shared connection over AirPort somehow precludes file sharing, but I now notice that screen sharing (i.e. viewing the iMac's screen from the MacBook) works just fine, which makes me think file sharing should work too.
So, should file sharing work or not and, if yes, any ideas on what could be going wrong?
Many thanks!

I've never tried connection sharing - frankly, getting a router and using that is a much better method - but I would have though it wouldn't have interfered with File Sharing.
You might like to check through the process on this page just to make sure that you are doing everything properly:
http://homepage.mac.com/rfwilmut/notes/sharing.html

1 Admin console to manage OSB and SOA installed on different servers

Dear All,
We are planning to have OSB installed on Host 1 and SOA server installed on Host 2. But there will be one Admin console to manage these 2 for the ease of maintenance. When i was trying to install this configuration I had few issues. Hope SOA experts can help me with the configuration.
1)
As SOA and OSB are installed on 2 different host both the servers must have weblogic installed as pre requisite. So I will have
on host 1:
http://host1:7001/console
http://host1:7001/sbconsole
On host 2:
http://host2:7001/console (this is redundant)
http://host2:8001/soa-infra
2) Is it possible to inactivate http://host2:7001/console ? and add SOA server running on host2 to http://host1:7001/console. In the sense, I would like to control the SOA server from host 1.
Issue No :2
When I create a domain on Host 1 I just get the options for OSB and not SOA. It is obvious as SOA is not installed on Host1. but if that is the case, Is it possible to add SOA server running on host2 to host1. Is it going to be a cluster?
Is this configuration seems realistic? Has anyone implemented. Any pointers please.
Reagrds,
Aani

Hi Aani,
Please go through the blog series -
http://blogs.oracle.com/reynolds/2010/09/installing_an_11g_soa_cluster.html
You may also refer EDG -
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E17904_01/core.1111/e12036/toc.htm
Regards,
Anuj
Edited by: Anuj Dwivedi on Feb 23, 2011 9:14 PM

Security & Servlet engine and ejb container on different servers

          When you have the servlet container and the ejb container on different physical servers,
          how is the rmi connection meant to to be done while still maintaining the seucrity
          propagation from servlet to ejb tier?
          Assume that my user is already authenticated (forms) on the servlet tier. Do we then
          create a dedicated connection (InitialContext + url/username/password properties)
          to the ejb tier and store this connection in the HttpSession? (basically authenticating
          a 2nd time)
          OR,
          can the servlet container make a generic connection to the ejb container, and pass
          the users security context to the ejb tier transparantly?
          -Sam


Nick Minutello <[email protected]> wrote:
          > Assuming that web container security is being employed, I guess the fundamental question
          > is: Is it necessary to create a "connection" (ie. an InitialConext) per user, or
          > can a "global" initial context be shared (in the end, the TCP connection is shared
          > anyway)?
          It doesn't create a 'connection' per user - when you use JNDI authentication (specifying
          principal and credentials when constructing InitialContext) it associates security info
          with the current thread for the duration of the request. If you cache InitialContext and
          use it later on some other thread it will not do anything.
          > Does it really matter?
          No ;-)
          > Thanks,
          > Nick
          > "Dimitri I. Rakitine" <[email protected]> wrote:
          >>Nick Minutello <[email protected]> wrote:
          >>
          >>
          >>> OK, so when I create the InitialContext, I just specify the URL (to call
          >>the remote
          >>> EJB container). The user ID and credentials are mapped automatically.
          >>
          >>> I obviously also need to cache the initialContext variable in my HTTPSession
          >>object?
          >>
          >>> What would happen if I had one InitialContext for the whole servlet engine
          >>- and
          >>> each thread used that. Would the thread (security) context still get passed
          >>- or
          >>> would the credentials for the original connection get used?
          >>
          >>If you use web-app security, container will associate security info with
          >>the current
          >>thread before invoking your servlet. If you do not use it and cache InitialContext,
          >>
          >>then the current user will always be 'guest' (except for the very first
          >>time when
          >>application calls 'new InitialContext()' with username/password.
          >>
          >>
          >>> Thankyou.
          >>> -Sam
          >>
          >>
          >>> "Vinod Mehra" <[email protected]> wrote:
          >>>>
          >>>>"Sam the bad cat" <[email protected]> wrote in message
          >>>>news:[email protected]...
          >>>>>
          >>>>>
          >>>>> When you have the servlet container and the ejb container on different
          >>>>physical servers,
          >>>>> how is the rmi connection meant to to be done while still maintaining
          >>>>the
          >>>>seucrity
          >>>>> propagation from servlet to ejb tier?
          >>>>>
          >>>>> Assume that my user is already authenticated (forms) on the servlet
          >>tier.
          >>>>Do we then
          >>>>> create a dedicated connection (InitialContext + url/username/password
          >>>>properties)
          >>>>> to the ejb tier and store this connection in the HttpSession? (basically
          >>>>authenticating
          >>>>> a 2nd time)
          >>>>>
          >>>>> OR,
          >>>>> can the servlet container make a generic connection to the ejb container,
          >>>>and pass
          >>>>> the users security context to the ejb tier transparantly?
          >>>>
          >>>>If the user has logged in already, ie the authenticated user is already
          >>>>in
          >>>>the execute
          >>>>thread, the identity should be propgated to the ejb tier transparantly,
          >>>>when
          >>>>you create the
          >>>>new initial context.
          >>>>
          >>>>--Vinod.
          >>>>
          >>>>
          >>>>>
          >>>>> -Sam
          >>>>>
          >>>>>
          >>>>
          >>>>
          >>
          >>--
          >>Dimitri
          >>
          Dimitri

MySql database and php code on different servers

I created a table on a MySql database on server A. Now I'm
trying to create
a page to display the contents of the table. I know that the
html code ( and
php) is on a different server (server B). I managed to create
a database
connection however when I try this connection I cannot see
the table I
created. When I click on the Connection name I get the Stored
Procedures,
Tables and View list. I click on the Tables and although I
get a connection
to the server A, no table is displayed.
Am I trying to do something silly here?
any help will be appreciated.
Twanny

> Am I trying to do something silly here?
I do it this way all the time. My testing server is local to
my development
LAN, but the MySQL server and database is remote (on the
remote site). To
make this work, you would have to make sure that the remote
server permits
an external connection. If it does, you should be golden.
Murray --- ICQ 71997575
Adobe Community Expert
(If you *MUST* email me, don't LAUGH when you do so!)
==================
http://www.projectseven.com/go
- DW FAQs, Tutorials & Resources
http://www.dwfaq.com - DW FAQs,
Tutorials & Resources
==================
"Twanny" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:gabbu1$ngv$[email protected]..
>I created a table on a MySql database on server A. Now
I'm trying to create
>a page to display the contents of the table. I know that
the html code (
>and php) is on a different server (server B). I managed
to create a
>database connection however when I try this connection I
cannot see the
>table I created. When I click on the Connection name I
get the Stored
>Procedures, Tables and View list. I click on the Tables
and although I get
>a connection to the server A, no table is displayed.
>
> Am I trying to do something silly here?
>
> any help will be appreciated.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Twanny
>

MOBI with BOE and mobile server on different servers

Hi Experts,
We need to set up a BO MOBI with BOE and Mobile server on two separate servers.
In such a configuration, how does the two servers communicate?
What should be the VAS and VMS server configurations? especially the external hostnames in the files?
We are looking for a non Blackberry(proxy) deployment.
We have installed the software,however the windows services of Authserver and the Job servers are not available in the mobile server instance
Any help would be highly appreciated.

I figured it out. I had to re-run the schconfig utility on UNIX and reconfigured the server from localhost:9710 to the actual server name.

BI Schedule and Presenation Server on Different Servers Configuration

I'm having a problem getting my iBots to run and deliver the information to the catalog with the following configuration:
2 Presentation Servers on Windows with IIS for NTLM authentication (via a Load Balancer)
OBIEE Server and Scheduler, and Presenation Server on Solaris (the Presentation Server on Solaris will be turned off)
The catalog between the 2 Windows Servers are are shared. When I create an iBot on the Windows the request is sent to the Scheduler on Solaris and errors out with the following message:
[nQSError: 77006] Oracle BI Presentation Server Error: A fatal error occurred while processing the request. The server responded with: Path not found (
/shared/_ibots/Test Email from UAT)^M
Error Codes: U9KP7Q94^M
My question is why does the scheduler send the alert to the Presentation Server on the Solaris box and not the shared Presentation Server with the shared catalog on the Windows Servers. Am I missing something in the configuration?
Thanks,
Chuck

I figured it out. I had to re-run the schconfig utility on UNIX and reconfigured the server from localhost:9710 to the actual server name.

Problems with IISProxy Module (IIS and EP6.0 on different servers)

Hi I am trying to configure IIS 6, I have followed all the instructions outlined in the document "Installing the IIS Proxy Module" and followed the note 715303. When i try to access the the link http://ep6idc91.***.com I get the under construction main page to IIS server.
My IIS server is ep6idc91 and the ep6 server is ep6idc92.
Is my XML config correct?
<ISAPI-config version="1.6">
<filter name="IisProxy filter" authentication="forward" log-level="1" log-flags="0" debug-flags="0" priority="high" extension-url="/scripts/IisProxy.dll" remote-address="skip" />
<extension name="IIsProxy irj" log-level="1" log-flags="0" debug-flags="0" access="filter" />
<mapping name="IIsProxy irj" log-level="1" log-flags="0" debug-flags="0" keep-alive="true" use-continue="true" close-socket="true" close-socket-delay="1000" thread-count="100" max-socket-age="37">
<source access="filter">
<protocol>http</protocol>
<prefix>/irj/</prefix>
</source>
<target>
<protocol>http</protocol>
<host>ep6idc92.****.com</host>
<port>50100</port>
</target>
<compress-types min-size="1024">text/html, text/plain</compress-types>
<protocol-header>ClientProtocol</protocol-header>
</mapping>
<config>
<source access="filter">
<protocol>http</protocol>
<host>ep6idc91.*****.com</host>
<prefix>/IISProxy</prefix>
</source>
</config>
</ISAPI-config>
Message was edited by: Anton Ansalmar

Hi Anton,
Here is sample IIS file of mine.
<ISAPI-config version="1.6">
     <filter name="IisProxy filter" authentication="forward" />
     <extension name="IisProxy extension" />
     <mapping name="IisProxy samples">
          <source>
               <protocol>http</protocol>
               <prefix>/irj/</prefix>
          </source>
          <source>
               <protocol>http</protocol>
               <prefix>/irj</prefix>
               <new-prefix>/irj/</new-prefix>
          </source>
          <source>
                  <protocol>http</protocol>
                  <prefix>/portal/</prefix>
                  <new-prefix>/irj/</new-prefix>
                 </source>
          <source>
               <protocol>http</protocol>
               <prefix>/logon/</prefix>
          </source>
          <target>
               <protocol>http</protocol>
               <host><hostname></host>
               <port>50000</port>
          </target>
          <compress-types>text/html, text/plain</compress-types>
     </mapping>
     <mapping name="Secure IisProxy samples">
          <source>
               <protocol>https</protocol>
               <prefix>/Hello/</prefix>
          </source>
          <target>
               <protocol>https</protocol>
               <host>localhost.your.corp</host>
               <port>8443</port>
          </target>
          <keystore-path>c:\sec\SAPSSLC.pse</keystore-path>
     </mapping>
     <config>
          <source>
               <protocol>http</protocol>
               <host>localhost</host>
               <prefix>/IisProxy</prefix>
          </source>
          <source>
               <protocol>https</protocol>
               <host>localhost</host>
               <prefix>/IisProxy</prefix>
          </source>
     </config>
</ISAPI-config>
thanks,
Praveen

BPEL and ESB in different Servers

Hi ,
What is the advantage of having BPEL PM and ESB installed in different servers ?

In my knowledge it has it own merits and demerits
IF (BPEL and ESB) installed in dfferent OC4Js (JVMs)
Merits
1) Individual JVM for each component means more memory allocation and support from JVM
2) More number of processes can be deployed.
DeMerits
1) ESB and BPEL communication can happen via SOAP over HTTP only whereas had these been deployed in the same JVM (oc4j) it can do native communication.
Edited by: cdmnagaraj on Apr 22, 2009 5:17 AM

ESB and BPEL in different servers

Hi ,
Is there any performance based advantage when we have BPEL and ESB in different servers ?

If you seperate them, it will have impacht on the perfromance. Services are called over the network, assuming BPEL and ESB are on different servers. Otherwise they can call each other via native binding if ESB and BPEL are in the server and container.
Marc
http://orasoa.blogspot.com

Content database and share point configuration databases in different sql servers

HI
i have a sharepoint 2010 farm and connected to a sql server ,
here it can be possible to connect all sharepoint configuration databases to one sql server,
and content database in different sql server ,
if i do in future can i face any issues?
adil

Yes you can. You can specify the SQL server whilst creating the databases and as long as you have configured the required permissions that will be fine. If you really wanted you could have a dedicated SQL instance for each database, although that would be
very wasteful.
There are no significant issues, you will have a bit more maintenance to look after two SQL servers but that's about it.

MDT Deployment share and SQL Share on different servers

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for