Message KD258 - Settle Process Order by KO88
Hi gurus,
When I run KO88 I get following message:
Final delivery not entered for the order. It is not technically completed.
I have checked in CO03 and the order was TECO before I try to settle it.
Does anybody can help me?
Thanks.
>
Osmar Tardivo wrote:
> Hi gurus,
>
>
> When I run KO88 I get following message:
>
> Final delivery not entered for the order. It is not technically completed.
>
> I have checked in CO03 and the order was TECO before I try to settle it.
>
> Does anybody can help me?
>
> Thanks.
Dear,
I assume the order is currently with TECO status, If the order has RESA status, then perform the following transactions in sequence.
1. You need to run WIP using KKAX
2. You need to run variance KKS2
3. Last KO88.
Regards,
Prasobh
Regards,
Prasobh
Similar Messages
-
Which Tcode is used to settle Process order and tell me the Procedure?
hi,
you can follow and check with this below steps:
1) First you can check with that all the Goods issue is complted from the Production order
2)you can check with GR of the order is completed or not.
3)you can use the tcode production order change COR2 and do the TECO for the production order (PRODCUTION ORDER --> FUNCTIONS --> Restrict processing -->TECHNICALLY COMPLETE)
5.If you are using the individual order, use the tcode KO88 - Individual Processing
if you are using the collective, use the tcode CO88 - Collective Processing
let me know any clarification. pls reward your points.
regards,
mohan r -
Reversal of Settled Process Order
Please tell my how can we reverse already settled process order?
Its UrgentHi Sapna,
You can reverse the settled process order as shown in the below picture. Give the order number and provide other details required. Select Reverse under Settlement tab from the main menu and execute under "Test Run" initially for clarity. Later, remove the test run and execute the same.
BR, Srinivas Salapla -
Setting an job for closing settled process orders
Hi PP Gurus,
I have a requirement to set a background job to close the process orders that have been settled and have not been modified with a certain time frame.
Are there any standard programs which support this requirement of influencing the selection parameters like settled + eligibility time frame? How to identify the settled process orders in SAP?
Regards,
RamanaHi,
After the settlement, no particular status is updated in the process order. Hence not possible to select only those orders to close which have been settled.
Workaround I can think of is, in Tcode COHVPI, select those orders which have status TECO and VCAL, my argument would be orders which have status TECO and Variance calculated would be settled most of the time (Say 99%).
Hence set the parameters for background job as status TECO and VCAL. Then go to mass processing tab, select the function COMPLETE, select BACKGROUND in execute function option and create a variant and save.
In SM36 create job, enter the program PPIO_ENTRY, enter the variant created in the earlier step, schedule the date and time.
Regards
Vinod -
Target Cost in the settled process order become zero after cost deletion
Dear all,
User has standard cost estimates created in Jan 2010 that valid until the end of 2010 for every material in the system. user created a process order in April 2010. Target cost of the order was created based on the standard cost estimate and recipes as well as order qty. The order was also confirmed and settled in April 2010 without problem.
However, after I deleted all old costing estimates before I did a costing run for all materials in May 2010, the old order was resettled and all Target cost is removed from the order. I guess system try to look at April costing estimate but it is not there since it was deleted before I created the new costing estimate in May. Therefore, all varainces are throwed into remaining variances since the target cost become zero.
Other than mark the settled order for deletion or keep all old costing estimates, I am just wondering is anyway in the configuration to prevent the system to recaculate the target cost again for the settlement so I can avoid the problem happens?
Thanks.Hi,
Target costs are only calculated after goods movements have occured on the order, the Target Costs are then calculated during the Variance calculation.
Target costs will only be calculated after the first goods receipt has been posted to the order. Also you have to ensure that the information to calculate target costs exists on the system in particular in OKV6.
This estimation is based on the customizing for the Target cost version in transaction OKV6 as in turn will the "real" calculation of the Target costs via the variance calculation.
So in OKV6 the Target cost will be based on preliminary costing on the order, an alternative cost estimate or the current standard cost estimate. Importantly if the choosen option is not fulfilled e.g. no current standard cost estimate, the target costs will not be predicted or calculated.
regards
Waman -
Hi,
We calculate WIP weekly basis and WIP used to credited to a Balance sheet acct and DR to a P&L acct (which is generally NOT a Cost Element )
Here our Doubt,
WIP was calculating irrespective of Settlement that is we used to see the Doucument (DR and CR ).and can be verified to FS10N,but now some thing went wrong (I checked OKGA and OKG8 they have proper BS and P&L accts) and after calculating WIP the documents are not posted and FS10N shows nothing for that BS and P&L acct.
1)Can we calculate WIP without settling order (DLV or TECO) and get FI documnet posted ? which we used to get I believe,
2) what is wrong with our system where we got FI documnets for WIP previously and not getting Now even though we have same BS and P&l accounts in OKG8 ?
your help greatly appreciated,
Regards,
NikithaThank you Suryanaraya,
YES we calculate WIP on weekly Basis, But Financial statement analysis on Monthly Basis,
Your answer is convincing, But My user is adamant (in fact he shows the previous documnets posted for WIP) . so can you clarify, for example I calculated WIP (Lets say ,for this month) 2/11,2/14,2/21,2/28 ;;;;;; and , -$100,-$80,-$60,$40 for my Balance sheet ,Respectively , which shows $0.00 for that Process order as WIP, and we are done totally at the month end ,so you mean to say I will get 4 documents on Month end (Feb 28) as Document Date 2/11,2/14,2/21,2/28 and Posting Date 2/28 for all 4 when I run Settlement?
OR can I do weekly WIP and Settle order ? to see WIP documnets?
Please clarify,
Excuse my ignorance,
Nikitha -
After Settlement I need the Status of Process Order should become SETD/SETT.
What are the settings I have to do for this?
RajivDear,
You can close the order (status- CLSD) only when the balance is zero, balance will be zero only when order is settled, hence make a user status active when the status (SETD/SETT) of order is CLSD.
Do you know how to activate user status,,,i will give example here
1. Define status profile in BS02
Click on create
Say status profile ZSETTLE
Text - settlement
Language EN
Double click on ZSETTLE
In change status :user status
Status no= 1
Status = SETT
Short text = Settled
Initial status = ticked
Lowest = 1
Highest = 1
Follow the menu path
Goto -->object type
Select check box = PP/PM: order header
Click on user status pushbutton
You will come back to screen -change status :user status
Double click on status line
You will be in Change status profile business transaction control screen
Click on create
And select the radio button allowed for following
Close
Select set radio button for following
Revoke technical completion
Come back
Save it
In OPJH
For a given order type
Assign this status profile in StatusProfile Header field.
Save and come back.
Now create production order and test. -
Regarding Error Message while releasing Process Order
Dear friends,
While releasing process order i m getting following error message.
" Storage location in PUB(loc1) is not same as storage location (loc2)''.
how to remove this error and release the order.
Thanks & regards,
Sandip SonarHi Sandip,
The error message LP 099 'Stor. location in PUB X is not the same as prod.stor. location Y' is issued when the system finds inconsistancy in your customizing of the couple storage location - Production supply area for your components in your process order.
The logic of the storage location determination is the following ...
The issuing storage location is determined in three steps:
1. First, the issue storage location of the material to be issued (MARC-LGPRO) is transferred to the material master from the MRP data if it is filled.
2. The system overwrites this value with the issue storage location from the bill of material (RC29P-LGORT, STPO-LGORT) if it is filled.
3. If the operation to which the component is assigned in production order contains a work center with supply area, the storage location is transferred from this supply area (PVBE-LGORT). However, this transfer is only carried out if storage location data (MARD) is maintained for this storage location for the material.
The logic of the supply area determination:
Priority of supply area determination for WM staging is as follows :
1. Supply Area of Work Center (highest priority) If no supply area defined look to
2. Supply Area in item of Bill of material (second priority) If no supply area defined look to
3. Material Master View MRP2 (third priority) If no supply area defined -> Error message LP 099
I hope this helps in sorting the issue.
Regards,
Mauro -
CO88 - Actual Settlement: Process orders
Good night,
In transaction co88 selection options do not have the range of orders. Someone could tell me if there is any note with this option.
Thank,
Sergio NavarreteHi,
While settling the errors in CO88, .Here all orders are settled but for some error messages are seen.i get error messaged like Account is not assigned to a CO object.but.Here Co object is production order or cost center or wbs element . Can you tell me why this type of error are coming and what to do. -
Process order settlement error
Hi all
while doing settlement of process order in KO88, system throwing the follwing error.
'' valuation data for the material is being locked by the user xxxxxx'' . If we check in transaction: SM12 , here system showing MARA, MARC tables being locked.
Some background jobs also running which include MARA,MARC tables. so please suggest me the best way to do settlement of process orders. The background jobs should not stop.
thanks
sapproductionHI
At the same time one masters like material WC or PV cannot be processed the database tables used are locked while processing the same to get resolve this check the time of scheduled jobs which uses tables like MARA MARC after the finish of these jobs you can process the settlement if you get unlock the data from T code SM12 there is possibility of getting data lost. so
you can define your settlement process and schedule it just after the completion of those previous Jobs.
Check and revert
Regards
Anupam Sharma -
How to get the list of all process order which are settled?
Hello Friends,
Is there any standard report available to get the list of all settled Process Order or Production order?
Thanking all of you in advance.
Regards,
JitendraHi,
You can the below standardreports for knowing the list of Settled Process Orders :
1. Use Tcode : COOIS and in the selection fields provide the Process Order Type, Plant and System Status As " SETT" and execute the same . System will list all the Process Orders which were settled so far.
2. Use Tcode : CO26 with selection fields as above.
Hope this will suffice your reqt.
Regards
radhak mk -
Process order settlement issue
When we are settling process order to the material, which is having std price.The following entry is passed.
1) Price diffrence account- Debit/ credit (prd)
2)Inventory movement -Debit/ credit (gbb-vbr)
For point 2,the material code is not passed in FI doc.
Can ny one knows the reason for this?FI docuemt gets generated with reference to the GL of the respective material, which is based on the Valuation class.
You can also try , by CHECKING "Material Origin" in costing 1 view of material master. -
In Process Order status "SETT" Settled
Hi
After settlement of Process Order, system status (SETT - Settled) of Process Order is not updating atomically.
After settlement of Process Order, Process Order allow only in Display mode & there is no posting allow against settled Process Order.
Please suggest me what are the setting required.
Regards
ARKARK,
In your order type dependent parameters in transaction COR4, for you plant order type combination for Process documentation "Order record" radio button is active, that's why system is not allowing you to set deletion flag.
Are you working on a client system or a training system where you are just trying to test different scenarios?
If you are working in training system then in COR4 transaction for the plant order type combination you can activate the radio button for "No process documentation required". Now if you check the order it would allow you to set deletion flag.
If you are working on a project and client system, you need to ask the user to execute transaction COPA to store the order records, once this is done you would be able to set the deletion flag. (Please note: Before you execute transaction COPA necessary basis setting for storing has to be in place.)
Regards,
Prasobh -
Process orders in joint production: variance settlement to CO-PA
Dear all,
During integration test for costing based CO-PA, I have a problem regarding production variance settlement to CO-PA. I am testing CO-PA actual flows for november 2011. When I try to settle process orders with co-products for previous month, the system asks for PA transfer structure. Because of customizing setting for settlement profile being transfered later, previously created process order need to have this info, and i assigned PA structure manually in settlement rule for each process order. When I repeat variance settlement, only for process orders with co-product, the system still asks for this information, although I already had assigned PA structure to this order.
please give some advice.
Thanks DuskoHi
You may have 2 settlement rules for CO Products... So ensure you enter PA Trf Str at all the places... This error is never thrown by SAP w/o valid reason
br, Ajay M -
Error in Settlement production order
Hi,
I am facing follow error when try to settled production order in KO88.
There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible
Message no. KD256
Diagnosis
The sender has a results analysis key, but no accrued values.
Either the accrual was not yet started for the sender, or the values to be settled from the accrual equal zero.
Note
Actual costs are only settled once the sender is technically completed or finally delivered.
This applies to
Projects that cannot carry revenues
In Service Management for sales order production to the indicator (Calculate WIP for orders in sales order production) set in the accrual version for
Production orders
Internal orders with no revenues
Orders with no revenues
In Service Management for engineer-to-order production to the indicator (Calculate WIP for orders in engineer-to-order production ) set in the accrual version for
Internal orders with no revenues
Orders with no revenues
In Service Management to the indicator (Calculate WIP for internal and service orders with no revenues) set in the accrual version for
Internal orders with no revenues
Orders with no revenues
To the indicator (Calculate WIP for production orders without settlement to material) set in the accrual version for
Production orders without settlement to material
Procedure
1. If necessary, start the accrual calculation for the sender
2. Restart settlement
Raja.Hi AP,
First of all thanks for you are paying continue attention on my thread.
I have checked in production order that goods are issued against the production orders and costs are captured.
When I run KKAX,facing following error.Hope you can solve this.
There are values for cost element 50200000 that are not assigned to any line ID
Message no. KJ161
Diagnosis
Not all values for the cost element are assigned to a line ID.
Procedure
Assign the cost element to a line ID. If you don't want to include the cost element in results analysis, assign it to a line ID of category N.
You can access a detailed list of unassigned cost elements as follows: Start results analysis in the individual processing mode (transaction KKA1, KKA2, or KKA3). Select the field Full log. Execute the function. On the next screen, choose Logs -> Parameter List in the menu. A list is generated. The unassigned values are shown at the end of the list.
If cost element "+++++++++" was shown in the message, this is because in the assignment of costs and revenues to line IDs, you have not used a cost element other than the full masking "+++++++++". In this case a presummarization eliminates the information on the cost element.
Raja.
Maybe you are looking for
-
Real Instruments Feedback Garageband 08
I bought ilife 08. I usually use Protools to record with my Mbox but I wanted to screw around with Garageband. I can not for the life of me get real instruments to work. When it records all i get is a feedback loop from the moment I hit the record bu
-
ITunes Match and iOS 7.0.3 Upgrade - Syncing Issue
I subscribe to iTunes Match for my iPhone 4S. However, I still sync photos, videos, etc from my computer. During both the update to 7.0.3 and 7.0.2, my phone has taken an interminable amount of time to sync after upgrading the iOS. During the last
-
How to access to a "Variable" situated in a closed workbook
Hi Considering a Name declared in a Workbook and called "myName" - this Name belong to the workbook.names collection but do not correspond to any cell or range. I'd like to access to this name without being obiged to open the workbook where it is dec
-
Zero Fill and Upper Case in Visual Composer not working
Hello, I am building my first VC application and hit a small wall from get go. When I create input fields and set text formats for one to have "Zero Fill" and for the other one "Upper Case" they do not seem to work properly. Zero Fill does not work
-
Add new ratio in query with multiprovider
HelloWord! I have a problem. First, excuse me for my English. I have a query that has a multiprovider composed by two ods. I have a report created and it works correctly. This report has a filter and several free characteristics. The problem is that