Message mapping issue in idoc to jdbc scenario

We have a scenario of idoc->XI-JDBC
the below given segment may get repeated , as shown below ,
E1EDP19[2]--idoc segment
   QUALF---003
   IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
E1EDP19[3]--idoc segment
   QUALF---003
   IDTNR---20500000000034(EAN No)
Reqd mapping
if QUALF=003
THEN IDTNR----->Bar_code_Number_EAN
Now IDTNR has to be mapped with Bar_code_Number_EAN for the segment which comes last
Pl suggest how to map using graphical mapping for the above scenario.

Hi Raj ,
The current mapping works fine if the parent segment E1EDP01 is only one but if that gets repeated then the last value of IDTNR is getting populated in the target side, very clearly i m giving the source and target structure and the mapping done using the UDF
Source structure
E1EDP01
       E1EDP19[1]--idoc segment
              QUALF---002
              IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
       E1EDP19[2]--idoc segment
              QUALF---003
              IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
       E1EDP19[3]--idoc segment
           QUALF---003
           IDTNR---20500000000030(EAN No)
E1EDP01
     E1EDP19[1]--idoc segment
                QUALF---002
                IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
     E1EDP19[2]--idoc segment
               QUALF---003
               IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
      E1EDP19[3]--idoc segment
             QUALF---003
             IDTNR---20500000000031(EAN No)
E1EDP01
       E1EDP19[1]--idoc segment
               QUALF---002
                IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
      E1EDP19[2]--idoc segment
              QUALF---003
              IDTNR---01000123(Bar Code No)
     E1EDP19[3]--idoc segment
          QUALF---003
          IDTNR---20500000000032(EAN No)
Target mapping
if QUALF=002
THEN IDTNR--->Article_No this is the direct mapping so , no issues
if QUALF=003
THEN IDTNR----->Bar_code_Number_EAN, now this IDTNR should get repeated every time the segment E1EDP01 gets repeated , currently only the last value form all the IDTNR is coming to the target side.
The current mapping works fine if the parent segment E1EDP01 is only one
Target structure
Access1
IDTNR--> Bar_code_Number_EAN( value is 20500000000030)
Access2
IDTNR--> Bar_code_Number_EAN( value is 20500000000031)
Access3
IDTNR--> Bar_code_Number_EAN( value is 20500000000032)
Current mapping
If QUALF = 003
                Then QUALF ---->
                                                 mapBarCodeEAN---->Bar_code_Num_EAN
If QUALF = 003
                Then IDTNR ---->
Context of QUALF is set to E1EDP01
Context of IDTNR is set to E1EDP01
thanks for your personalised help
rgds
mojib
Edited by: mohammad mojib ur rahman on Apr 9, 2010 1:30 PM

Similar Messages

Mapping issue in idoc to JDBC scenario

mapping issue in idoc to JDBC scenario
source structure
E1KNB1M
BUKRS = 1000
E1KNB1M
BUKRS= 9000
E1KNB1M
BUKRS= 2000
THE NODE E1KNB1M is repeated many times and the field BUKRS is also repeated with E1KNB1M as above
TARGET field : ISFRANCHISE
if any where value of BUKRS =9000 we have to pass Y to the target filed, else N
if BUKRS = 9000   THEN ISFRANCHISE= Y
               ELSE
            ISFRANCHISE=N
I've done the mapping as below
BUKRS = 9000--> IF THEN Y ELSE N--
> ISFRANCHISE
BUT everry time the target value is N only
pl suggest
rgds
mojib

mapped like this
BUKRS--->SORT---->
                                             EQUALS --------IF---THEN    Y
9000------------------------>                                               ----------------->ISFRANCHISE
                                                              ELSE   N
context of BUKRS set to parent node
its worked
thanks to all for valuable suggestions
rgds
mojib

Context handling in message mapping for an IDoc to File Scenario

Hi,
Can somebody help me with this issue. I have an Idoc to file scenario. heres my idoc structure. Its a custom Idoc
Header (1..1)
Detail (0..Unbounded)
         DependentDetail (0...Unbounded)              Note: This dependentdetail is a subelement of Detail
Trailer(1...1)
I created my target structrure the same way as the Idoc structure.
My output is a simple text file. I need the output in this format
Header
Detail1
   Dependentdetail1
   DependentDetail2
   DependentDetail3
Detail2
   DependentDetail1
   Dependentdetail2
Detail3
Detail4
Trailer
Since the Detail and Dependent Detail records are unbounded .
But right now i m getting my output like this:
Header
Detail1
Detail2
Detail3
Detail4
Trailer
But the DependentDetail record in not showing up in the output file. I didnot do any context change in my mapping. So do I need to do any context handling??...If so can somebody explain me with this.
Thanks,
Adam
Edited by: hymanroth on Apr 29, 2011 11:11 PM

Thanks Kenneth foryour quick reply,
Yes, I see the payload for Dependent detail in SXMB_MONI. So as you said earlier there's a problem with my content conversion.
my content conversion is as follows:
Header.fieldNames
Header.fieldFixedLengths
Header.endSeparator
Detail.fieldNames
Detail.fieldFixedLengths
Detail.endSeparator
DependentDetail.fieldNames
DependentDetail.fieldFixedLengths
DependentDetail.endSeparator
Trailer.fieldNames
Trailer.fieldFixedLengths
Trailer.endSeparator
So As I told earlier. With the above content conversion. I am not able to get the Dependent detail record in my output file. So If there is a change in my content conversion can u check it and tell me where I went wrong.
Thanks,
Harsh
Edited by: hymanroth on May 2, 2011 7:03 PM

Message mapping challenge in IDOC to EDI scenario

Dear PI message mapping experts,
I'm a newbie in PI and facing a mapping problem using graphical message mapping.
I'm in an IDOC (INVOIC.INVOICE02) to FILE (EDI) scenario.
Here after is the mapping i need to perform :
Source structure IDOC :
<E1EDKA1> (0..99)
   <NAME1> A </NAME1> (0..1)
   <NAME2> B </NAME2> (0..1)
   <NAME3> C </NAME3> (0..1)
   <NAME4> D </NAME4> (0..1)
</E1EDKA1>
Target structure :
<AccountingCustomerParty> (1..1)
   <Party> (0..1)
      <PartyName> (0..unbounded)
          <Name>A</Name> (1..1)
      </PartyName>
      <PartyName>
          <Name>B</Name>
      </PartyName>
      <PartyName>
          <Name>C</Name>
      </PartyName>
      <PartyName>
          <Name>D</Name>
      </PartyName>
   </Party>
</AccountingCustomerParty>
I know i have to play with context and queues with stanard function or UDF but cannot succeed to do it.
Could you please help me ?
Thanks in advance,
Alysee

One approach out of available few ways to implement this:
NAME1 - Exists - CreateIf - PartyName[0]
NAME2 - Exists - CreateIf - PartyName[1] (Create deuplicate segment)
NAME3 - Exists - CreateIf - PartyName[2] (Create deuplicate segment)
NAME4 - Exists - CreateIf - PartyName[3] (Create deuplicate segment)
Srikanth Srinivasan

Mapping Issue for IDoc to JDBC interface

Hi All,
I am having problem in implementing logic in IDoc to JDBC interface where I have to filter out E1WBB07-KSCHL = VKP0.
Source IDoc structure is like ->
E1WBB01(occ 0 -1000)
|-> E1WBB03 (occ 0-100)
            |-> E1WBB07(occ 0-1000)
                     |-> KSCHL
                          DATAB
                          DATBI
Now, For each KSCHL = VKA0 there should be a duplicate VKP0 record. From these 2 records only the VKA0 should get processed and VKP0 ignored.
Duplicates for VKP0 and VKA0 can be identified by identical DATAB and DATBI.
Suppose, in one E1WBB03 segment,there are 4 E1WBB07 segment having following values.
1: KSCHL=VKP0, DATAB=20102011, DATBI=25102011
2: KSCHL=VKP0, DATAB=26102011, DATBI=30102011
3: KSCHL=VKA0, DATAB=26102011, DATBI=30102011
4: KSCHL=VKP0, DATAB=01112011, DATBI=31129999
2 & 3 are duplicates. From these, 2 should get dropped.
As a result only 1, 3 and 4 should get processed.
How can I proceed with this..?...I have tried some work around but not able to do it successfully. Is a UDF required to compare DATAB and DATBI. If yes how it can be written.?
Thnx in advance,
Praveen.

chk below mapping:
change the context of DATAB, DATAB1 and KSCHL to E1WBB03 (right click-> context) in all the mappings shown below
1)
DATAB
------------concat-----sort----splibyvalue(value change)-----collapse context---TargetNode
DATBI
2)
DATAB
------------concat-----sortbykey \
DATBI                    /        \
KSCHL------------/                 \
----------------------------------------FormatByExample----sort-----UDF1----Target KSCHL
DATAB                                    /
----concat---sort--splibyvalue(value change)-
DATBI
3)
DATAB
---concat ( ; )-----sort-splibyvalue(value change)---collapse context--splitbyvalue (each value)--UDF2---TargetDATAB
DATBI
4)
DATAB
------------concat ( ; )-----sort----splibyvalue(value change)-----collapse context--splitbyvalue (each value)--UDF3---TargetDATABI
DATBI
UDF1: execution type : all values of a context...input: var1
int a=var1.length;
int count=0;
if(a>=2)
for(int i=0;i<a;i++)
if(var1<i>.equals("VKA0"))
count= count+1;
else
result.addValue(var1[0]);
if(count>1)
for(int i=0;i<count;i++)
result.addValue("VKA0");
UDF2:execution type: single value...input: var1
String [] temp= var1.split(";");
return temp[0];
UDF3: execution type: single value...input: var1
String [] temp= var1.split(";");
return temp[1];

PI : Idoc to JDBC scenario : repeating segments mapping issue

Experts
Please help.
Question reg. mapping for ECC idoc to JDBC scenario.
I am using the ORDRSP idoc which has multiple segments as below.
IDOC -> multiple E1EDK14 segments with 2 fields (QUALF and ORGID)
Depending on the value of the QUALF field i need to populate the column in my target structure.
QUALF 001 => Colmn a
QUALF 002 => Colmn b
For now my graphical mapping is very simple - QUALF => column a (done just to find out how PI mapping works)
What happens in my case, is the PI Payload shows all the E1EDK14 segments however only the value 006 present in the first occurence goes into the target column.
How do I repeat a mapping between QUALF and target col. for multiple occurences of the same segment?
Please can you guide me reg. use of context, loop over segment, UDF = which will be the best solution to achieve this?

Hi
My mapping is as below. I will take an example of a sales order that has 2 line items 00010, 00020. The payload is as follows
I see this payload in the SXMB_MONI transaction => Receiver grouping => Payloads
- <ZORDRES>
- <IDOC BEGIN="1">
+ <EDI_DC40 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDK01 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDK14 SEGMENT="1">
<QUALF>006</QUALF>
<ORGID>01</ORGID>
</E1EDK14>
+ <E1EDK14 SEGMENT="1">
<QUALF>007</QUALF>
<ORGID>01</ORGID>
</E1EDK14>+ <E1EDK03 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDK03 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDK03 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDK03 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDKA1 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDKA1 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDKA1 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDKA1 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDKA1 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDK02 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDK02 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDK17 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDK18 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDK18 SEGMENT="1">
+ <E1EDP01 SEGMENT="1">
<POSEX>000010</POSEX>
+ <E1EDP01 SEGMENT="1">
<POSEX>000020</POSEX>
</E1EDP01>+ <E1EDS01 SEGMENT="1">
<SUMID>001</SUMID>
<SUMME>2</SUMME>
</E1EDS01>
+ <E1EDS01 SEGMENT="1">
<SUMID>002</SUMID>
<SUMME>1100.00</SUMME>
<SUNIT>GBP</SUNIT>
</E1EDS01>
</IDOC>
</ZORDRES>
There are 2 problems. First one which I discovered after posting the query. I can see only the line item 10 in the query that gets contructed in PI to insert the data into the target jdbc table. Please see jdbc receiver communication channel log below
If you see above there are 2 E1EDP01 segments for line 00010, 00020.
INSERT INTO tblOItem (IDocDate, IDocTime, SalesOrderNo, ItemNo, Plant, ItemCategory, UnitSellPrice, QuantityOrdered, QuantityAllocated, ScheduledDeliveryDate) VALUES (20111206, 135530, 0015002085, 000010, 0086, ZTAN, 0.00, 1.000, 1.000, 20111201)
My source and target mappings are as below.
ZSALORD
    IDOC
       BEGIN
         E1EDK01
         E1EDP01
           POSEX               =============> SalOrdItm table column itemno
My target side structure (idoc to jdbc scenario is as follows)
I have mapped the E1EDP01 to Statement - I thought this will build one query per line item (per occurence of E1EDP01) but this is not working.
MT_OITEM
Statement
    dbtablename       ============> SalOrdItm
      action      =================> Insert
      table
      access
        Itemno      (this is one of the columns from the table)
The occurence of E1EDP01 is 0..9999999 while the occurence of Statement node is 1...unbounded.
Please is there any email address where I can send you screen shots if the above is not clear.
I need to get this interface delivered as soon as possible but am STUCK.
Edited by: gary jojo on Dec 6, 2011 3:06 PM

Storage Issue in Database while executing Idoc to Jdbc scenario

Hi,
I am testing an Idoc to JDBC scenario. The scenario executes correctly, but the number of records getting stored in the database are not equalling the data present in the Idoc.
Eg: If the Idoc has data for around 75000 records to be saved, only around 50000 records are getting saved in JDBC SQl server database.
Please let me know what could be the issue and how to resolve it.
Regards
Kiran.

Check the output XML in XI;ie, the output of your mapping. Does it have the same number of records as the Idoc? if no the issue is in the mapping.
Regards
Bhavesh

Very strange error : IDOC to jdbc scenario

Hi
I am getting a very strange error when I see the log for the idoc to jdbc scenario that I am building.
The mapping test shows the header record and line item record properly in the mapping result.
insert, access nodes, fields with access nodes are all formed correctly.
However the communication channel log shows below error.
Could not execute statement for table/stored proc. "tblTestItem" (structure "Item") due to com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerException: Incorrect syntax near ')'.
JDBC Message processing failed, due to Error processing request in sax parser: Error when executing statement for table/stored proc. 'tblTestItem' (structure 'Item'): com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerException: Incorrect syntax near ')'.
The message status was set to WAIT.
The query that I see in the log is :INSERT INTO tblTestItem () VALUES ()
However mapping tool shows that all nodes are correctly formed.
Please assist.

Hi
I am still getting this issue even after the below steps so kind of stuck - actually very much stuck.
1. Restart of the dev environment
2. Tried with a new extension of the idoc
In the communication channel log for the JDBC receiver channel I still see
INSERT INTO tblItem () VALUES ()
The payload that I see in the message content tab is as follows
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <ns0:MT_XXX_XXXX xmlns:ns0="http://capita.com/pi/XXXX">
- <Statement>
- <dbTableName action="INSERT">
<table>tblItem</table>
</dbTableName>
- <access>
<InvoiceNo>0000000009293467</InvoiceNo>
</access>
</Statement>
</ns0:MT_XXX_XXXX>
How do I debug the jdbc adapter to see how it converts the above xml output from the mapping step (note that this output is from an actual run and not test tool) to a sql query.
Very strange that the column names are present in the target payload but it is not reflecting in the query.
I have other tables being populated with the same jdbc receiver communication channel which makes this more and more confusing.
PLEASE ADVICE.

Pass system ack of JDBC adapter to ERP in IDoc - XI - JDBC scenario

Dear all,
i have an IDoc -> XI -> JDBC scenario (without using ccBPM). In the standard way the ERP system, sending the IDoc waits for an application acknowledgement. However the JDBC adapter is only capeable to send system acknowledgements.
Is there a way to pass these acknowledgements to the IDoc status record?
In help.sap.com (http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nwpi71/helpdata/en/ab/bdb13b00ae793be10000000a11402f/frameset.htm) under "IDoc Processing with the IDoc Adapter " there is a table that maps XI system/applic acknowledgement to IDoc status. So in my opinion the status record of my IDoc should at least chenge to the corresponding status for the system ack.
Can anyone tell, if this is really working? What if I deactivate the acknowledgement request in the NOALE programm?
In any case, can I achieve to transfer the system ack to the IDoc status without using a ccBPM?
Many thanks and best regards
Florian

Is there a way to pass these acknowledgements to the IDoc status record?
Without BPM, No.
So in my opinion the status record of my IDoc should at least chenge to the corresponding status for the system ack.
The ack referred here is related to idoc status whether it is properly reached till XI or not and not related to the JDBC ack.
What if I deactivate the acknowledgement request in the NOALE programm?
Then u won't have any ALEAUD message at sender R3.
In any case, can I achieve to transfer the system ack to the IDoc status without using a ccBPM?
No
Regards,
Prateek

IDOC to JDBC scenario in case of Cost Element Group IDOC.

This is an IDOC to JDBC scenario.
The Cost Element Group IDOC is having different segments. The main segment E1COGH (1...unbound) is consisting of different subsegment like E1OGS (0...unbound) & E1COGV (0...unbound). The main segment (E1COGH) along with subsegments E1OGS & E1COGV) is occuring more that 1 times. I have to insert data into the table, which we can do in single rows (no hierarchy is possible in tables). I have used "use one as many" in message mapping. Now if E1OGS or E1COGV is repeating in a single E1COGH segment then we dont get any error. But if I duplicate the main segment then I am getting runtime exception.
Please suggest about how to map in this case.

In my scenario:
     E1COGH
     |
      -> E1COGS
         E1COGV
where     E1CGH -> Main segment
     E1COGS & E1COGV -> sub segment
E1COGH -> 1..unbound
E1COGS -> 1..unbound
E1COGV -> 1..unbound
At the target side I have created two Statement Structure (ie.Statement & Statement_1) . One for E1COGS (ie. Statement) & the other for E1COGV (ie. Statement_1).
Case 1 -> If E1COGS is present in the main segment E1COGH then it is mapped AS IS.
Case 2 -> If E1COGS is not present in the main segment E1COGH then it is mapped as blank.
This will be mapped with Statement & in the absence of E1COGS this Statement structure is SUPPRESSED.
Similarly,
Case 1 -> If E1COGV is present in the main segment E1COGH then it is mapped AS IS.
Case 2 -> If E1COGV is not present in the main segment E1COGH then it is mapped as blank.
This will be mapped with Statement_1 & in the absence of E1COGV this Statement_1 structure is SUPPRESSED.
All the elements of the segment E1COGH, E1COGHT & E1COGHR are replicated in all the rows for X (no. of occurance of E1COGS) + Y (no. of occurance of E1COGV).
While testing in Message Mapping, I am able to get the output as for multiple occurence of E1COGS & E1COGV in a single E1COGH.
But if I increse the occurence of E1COGH the it is giving the following error :
Runtime exception during processing target field mapping /ns0:MT_Cost_Element_Group_Response/Statement/DBtablename/access/GROUPNAME. The message is: Exception:[com.sap.aii.mappingtool.tf3.IllegalInstanceException: Too few values in first queue in function useOneAsMany. It must have the same number of contexts as second queue.] in class com.sap.aii.mappingtool.flib3.NodeFunctions method useOneAsMany[com.sap.aii.mappingtool.flib3.CollapseContexts@51197231, , ]
Please suggest how to map the occurence of E1COGH simultaneously with the occurence of E1COGS & E1COGV.

IDOC-XI-JDBC scenario, jdbc sent too slow

i have a IDOC-XI-JDBC scenario,
the problem is that near 5 Lac IDOC is sent to XI, each IDOC is processes by an instance of the scenario, and the sent to the Database is too clow...means 4000 records per hour,
can i configure the JDBC receiver adapter in a way, so that it becomes faster/more concurrent,

Hey,
First raise the issue to the DBA he might help resolve the ISSUE more efficently.
Secondly check in the JDBC adapter -> Adavance mode -> Disconnect from the data base after processing each message shouldn't be set.
Even check with Database Transaction Isolation Level -> default is value of the connected database.
<b>The isolation level determines how transactions running in parallel can influence each other</b>
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/64/ce4e886334ec4ea7c2712e11cc567c/content.htm
Why not the other way around > Collect multiple idocs in a file restrict maxium number of idocs to required value then send the file ?
Stefan Grube Example:
/people/stefan.grube/blog/2006/09/18/collecting-idocs-without-using-bpm
if it is with bpm then collect multiple idoc with occurance change and send them.
<b>Cheers,
*RAJ*
**REWARD POINTS IF FOUND USEFULL <b>

Idoc to jdbc scenario of sap xi

Hi All,
i want step by step procedure for developing idoc 2 jdbc scenario. Anybody have this scenario, please send me that.
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarjuna.

Hi
Have a look at these threads
/people/laxman.molugu/blog/2006/08/13/integration-with-databases-made-easy-150-part-1
Re: Idoc triggering from a transaction
Message Mapping - JDBC to IDoc
Re: JDBC - System/Application Acknowledgement
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/09/01/xi-idoc-adapter--edidc40--demystified
Process Integration (PI) & SOA Middleware
**Reward points if helpfull**

Problem in Idoc to JDBC scenario(uses BPM)

Hi
I have a IDoc to JDBC scenario which also uses BPM.
The JDBC adapter has to execute a Stored procedure on Sybase database.
I work on XI3.0 SP14.
When I am sending IDoc to XI it is failing in CALL adapter step.
The error message is "Unable to convert sender service TruckLiftAccountUpdate to an ALE logical system".
However this scenario is working in Production with same settings.But it is not working in Quality and it is giving the above error.
Can any one help me in this.
Thanks in advance.
KP

Thanks for your quick reply..
All the settings are in place.
Here the Idoc is coming to BPM and BPM cant able to execute the stored procedure.and we are getting the error from BPM to target system.
Here error is unable to convert the sender service(from BPM service) to ALE
logical system.
same settings are there in Production but it is not working in QA.
Thanks in adavnce,
KP

Message mapping issue

Hi guys,
I am facing an issue in mapping.
it is IDOC to File scenario.
this is wat i have to perform.
(MARM-UMREN / MARM-UMREZ) for PC x (MARM-UMREZ / MARM-UMREN) for CAS.
here PC and CAS both taken from MARM-MARM..which i got from my IDOC.
How can i get make 2 values for MARM_meinh(PC and CAS).only 1 value comes in idoc.
please provide me some logic for this.
Thanks in advance.
Sahil

Hi,
You can use advanced user defined function.
Give input as Header element.
add all the elements within header in the result set.
put splitByvalue at the output of user defined funstion and map it to sub..
i assume that sub is unbounded.
This should work. check this out.
reply if it works
thanks and regards
P.Venkat

IDOC to JDBC scenario: Does INSERT command expect a result value?

Hello,
we have an IDoc-to-JDBC-scenario configured on our XI 3.0, which uses the INSERT command to put a dataset coming from R/3 into a SQL database. This works fine.
Now a trigger has been activated on the database, which sets a flag to each dataset after inserting.
Because of this a system error occurs in the Adapter Engine and I found in the AuditLog (logSQLStatement=true), that the INSERT command is processed correcty, but in the next step an error is shown up: 'SQLServerException. A result set was generated for update.'
Could it be, that the trigger returns a result value, which can't be handled on the XI ?
If yes, how can I solve this issue? I have read something about the different methods execute(), executeUpdate() and executeQuery(), but I don't know how and where this has to be configured...
Thanks in advance,
Juergen

Hi Upendra,
I got some more information from the database adminstrator:
He used the following command 'exec xp_cmdshell @ExportCmd , no_output'
whereas @ExportCmd contains the command.
With the no_output option, the xp_cmdshell does not return a recordset.
I hope this will be helpful to you.
Grtz,
Juergen

Message mapping issue in idoc to jdbc scenario

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for