Mid Month Payrollrun - while Employee Resignation

Hi Experts,
My client has the requirement of configuration of Full & Final settlement.
If any employee leaves in mid month (7 or 18 days) days they want to calculate based on the No Of Days worked.
Pls Note: They are not using Off Cycle & they don't have any policy of using. If any employee leaves in the end of the month no issues, b'cas payroll run will be for full month.
Let me know how this can be done.
OR
Pls correct me if i am wrong...
Can i club the previous month & the current month say eg. 45 days together & run the pauroll. if this is possible how can i configure..
Appreciate your valuable inputs.
Regards
Raj

Hi Sikindar,
Thanks for your quick response.
As u said: I will maintain 1 dummy Payroll area & assign that to employee who are resigning in mid month.
(What would be the combination for that payroll area like Period / Date modifier.)
Let me know what are all the other configuration do i need to maintain.
Appreciate your early response.
Regards
Rajesh

Similar Messages

PF- Mid month employees

Hi all,
I am facing some issue in the provident fund for the Mid month joined employees. As per the client requirement, SAP is not calculating. I need your help in this.
For all the employees we are maintaining the IT 0587 has whichever is less.
I go through some of the threads, still now I am not able to put condition in the PCR.
Ex: Employee hired in the month of april 15.04.2014 his Basic salary is 10,000 rps. When I run the payroll basic salary is prorated with the amount 5333.33 for 16 days in the april month. But, PF should calculate based on the amount 5333.33 but in the output it is showing as 416.
Actually, PF should deduct 640 rps but it is showing 416 rps. 224 rps different amount is coming. How to resolve this one.
Regards,
Vijay Kumar

Hi,
When employee joins in the middle of the month The provident fund will prorate on Rs 6500 according to PF Act and standard rule that was defined in SAP as per act. You cannot change the rule that has defined in standard. The user exist cannot be the right solution for this. The user exist which are there it will not override the standard functionality. The best way is to go according to Act that was defined in SAP.
Incase if you want Rs 780 to be deducted for the first month for mid month joinee employees This can be done by manually inputting the data in additional payment wage type There are several ways to adjust the amount. You can either create a PF Adjustment wage type in additional payment for mid joinee employees to adjust the amount.

Payroll processing for Mid month Joinees and Separated Employees

Hi Folks,
I have the following queries with regard to separation and Joining.
1.In Legacy , people who are joining after 17 of the current month is getting paid in the next month. Our Payroll Period is from 1 to 31st . Is it possible to stop Payment for people who are joining after 17th of the current month and Pay them in the subsequent month.
2.In legacy usually the Settlement happens in the subsequent month of Separation. Say if a employee resigns on April, he will get his full and Final settlement in the month of May or june. For a separated employee is it possible to make payment in the subsequent months.
Rgds,
Sekar.

For point no 1, yes its possibel. and there are multiplt ways to that. like lock the employee in payroll status infotype, or write a rule where in check the DOJ of the employee, and if employee joins after 17th, reject the payroll for that employee
For point no 2, yes you can process later also, but ensure that payroll gets processes in that financial year itself.

Income tax issue for mid month joinees

Issue 2:
For New (mid month) joinee at the first month gross salary is calculated based on the earned salary amount *12 months (or no. of remaining months for financial yr end), but in my client income tax deducted based on the actual salary (not earned salary) from the first month onwards.
For example :
Employee X,
Joined date 15.08.2011,
Actual salary = 1,00,000 INR. Earned salary for 15 days = 50,000 INR.
While Start Payroll for the period 5th (August) 2011. The WT /416 Gross salary = 4,00,000 (50000*8). Based on this gross salary income tax calculated, But I want to calculated the gross at first month (august 2011) based on follows,
Gross salary : August month earned salary = 50,000 + Actual salary per month =1,00,000*7 =7,00,000.
Gross salary = 7,50,000 INR.
Please give me some solution
Thanks and regards
Mohan .V

Hi Param Dayal,
New issues rise Now....
For New (mid month) joinee at the first month Exemption U/S 10 is calculated based on the Conveyance Allowance amount *12 months (or no. of remaining months for financial yr end), but in my client income tax Exemption U/S 10 based on the actual salary (not earned salary) from the first month onwards.
For example :
Employee X,
Joined date 15.08.2011,
Conveyance Allowance = 800 INR. Earned Conveyance Allowance for 15 days = 400 INR.
While Start Payroll for the period 5th (August) 2011. The WT /130 Exemption U/S 10 = 3,200 (400*8). Based on this Conveyance Allowance The Exemption U/S 10 calculated, But I want to calculated the Exemption U/S 10 at first month (august 2011) based on follows,
August month earned Conveyance Allowance = 400 INR + Actual Conveyance Allowance per month =800*7 =5,600.
Exemption U/S 10 = 6,000 INR.
Please give me some solution
Thanks and regards
Mohan .V
Edited by: mohantamilan on Sep 26, 2011 2:52 PM

Chennai Ptax calculation during Withdrawn stage in mid month

Hi Experts,
As i know chennai Ptax is calculated twice in a year 6th and 12th or 5th and 11th period.
But if employee resign during the mid cycle example:employee joined april and resigned in mid july, will ptax is calculated till that period or it will ignore ptax and run salary.
Appricate your response.
Regards
Sai

Hi Siva,
Professional tax cannot be prorated as it is not deducted on basis of attendance.
The Chennai professional tax is purely dependent on Gross Salary. For example an employee joined in the mid of the year for example an employee joined in the month of Feb and left in the month of august His/her gross salary is 10,000
According to rule it will divide 10000 by 6 months His professional will get deducted according to slabs
Many organizations deduct PT on a monthly basis by way of equal installments across a half –year period. For example, if an employee earns more Rs 15,000 each month (more than Rs 75,000 in a half-year), a sum of Rs 1095 should be deducted towards PT (please see the PT rate table above). Organizations following the equated monthly PT deduction method deduct Rs 182 (Rs 1095/6) each month towards PT in the monthly payroll. At the end of 6 months the organization will have deducted Rs 1095** for PT remittance. All is well.
**Rs 182 x 6 is actually Rs 1092 and not Rs 1095. This rounding-off problem can be easily solved by simply adding Rs 3 to the PT deduction amount during payroll in any of the months during the half-year period.
What happens if the employee does not work for the entire half-year period but leaves the organization at the end of say, 3 months? For example, let us assume that the employee works from 01-Apr-2012 to 30-Jun-2012 during the half-year period.
The company will have deducted Rs 546 (Rs 182 x 3) for the 3 months as per the equated monthly PT deduction logic. For the 3 months, the employee earned Rs 45,000 (this is the half-yearly salary since the employee leaves the organization), and for Rs 45,000 the organization should have deducted only Rs 235 as PT (please see the PT rate table above). In addition, Rs 546, the deducted PT amount, does not fall in any PT slab as specified by the Chennai Corporation. Ideally, the organization should refund Rs 311 (PT deducted in excess) to the employee. In practice, most organizations just remit whatever PT is deducted from employee salary. We have come across instances where PT authorities have questioned the basis of PT deduction when PT amounts do not fall under any PT slab.
There can also be instances when the equated PT deduction logic can lead to under-deduction of PT.
Let us assume that an employee earns Rs 7,000 per month (Rs 42,000 in a half-year period). The PT deduction for a half-year period should be Rs 235 (as per the PT slabs). As per the equated PT deduction logic, the organization will deduct Rs 39 per month (Rs 235/6). If the employee leaves the organization at the end of 5 months, the organization will have deducted Rs 195 as PT. However for an employee salary of Rs 35,000 (Rs 7,000 x 5 months), the organization should have deducted Rs 235. This is a case of under-deduction of PT.
The flaws of the equated PT deduction logic will come to the fore for any employee who does not work the entire six months in a half-year period.
If you are in favour of the equated PT deduction method and argue that you can always adjust the excess or short PT in the final settlement processing if an employee quits before the end of the half-year period, we will simply say that this will not be possible in case an employee absconds or does not have adequate settlement salary to recover the short PT in full.
In other words, the equated PT deduction logic is flawed and is better not followed. Of course, if an organization does not deduct PT each month but deducts PT only once every half year, this problem will not occur.

Posting error..mid month cost cenre chenged

Hi All
One employee transferred (18.04.2011) mid month. So i have changed position (cost centre also), then employee have one cost centre in 01.04.2011 to 17.04.2011 and from 18.04.2011 onwards in another cost centre. While doing posting (PC00_M99_CIPE) system is showing below error.
u201CBalancing field "Profit Centre" in line item 009 not filledu201D Message no. GLT2201u201D
Here, line item 009 is /559(bank transfer wage type)
Thanks and Regards
Madhu Bijjala

Hello Madhu,
Please check with the Finance team. Some of the settins related to cost center and profit center needs to be changed.
Check the below thread for your reference.
Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled
GLT2201 - Balancing field profit center in line item 001 not filled
Hope this helps.
Best Regards.
Karan.

IT0007 Change Mid Month/Payroll error

Geeks,
I have a situation wherein I need to change the WSR of a employee mid- month - which I did thru PA30 by creating a new IT7 with start date as 14 july 2014 (below is the overview screen shot of IT7 after change)
With Basic as 5000, I ran his payroll from 01-july 2014 to 31-july 2014, but when I look the form, its displaying Basic as 3518 (I haven assigned any unpaid or LOP). Can anybody help me out in knowing wht mistake m I doing?
regards
Tahir

In the IT to or from INP1, I can see that the Partial Period Parameters WageTypes /801, /802, /803 and /806 all total 100% (or 10.000,000), while /804 totals 70.37% and /805 totals 174.19%.
In the IT from XVAL, it can be seen that all valued WageTypes were done so by using /804.
I am not familiar with Payroll for India, but here are a two questions :
1 - If your Payroll Schema includes function PRINT with Par1 = NP and Par2 = PART, check your Partial Period Parameters and try to identify why /804 totals 70.37%.
2 - What kind of Absences or Attendances has the employee to justify that ratio?
You have mentioned that "Basic Salary" WT 1000 has Pr.Cl.10 with value 04, meaning that Partial Period Parameter /804 will be used for the factoring of that WT, and that is what happens.
The solution to your problem lies in understanding why the factors /802 and /804 are identical for the first portion of the payroll period but are different for the second part of the period.
3   /802   01     40 740,74
3   /802   02     59 259,26
3   /804   01     40 740,74
3   /804   02     29 626,63

Pension issue Mid Month Leaving

Dear All,
As per rule sustem should deduct mid month joining/leaving/absences or transfer scenarios, the Pension/PF Basis will be correspondingly prorated. But our system is not doing this. In RT table i have found 3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00.
Employee leaving date is 14.04.2010. system is picking pension amout as 541. Last year it was coming right.
Please suggest.
Ashwani

Dear Jayanti,
We required prorata basis pension in case of left employees and system is not doing this. This is the issue. As per our PF experts Pension amount should come on prorata basis for left employees in case they left mid of month.System is doing prorata basis last year but from this year it is deducting 541. I am giving two RT cases of different years.
RT table for year 2010. DOL 26.04.2010
/111 EPF Basis              01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/139 VPF Basis              01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/3F1 Ee PF contribution     01/2010                    0.00           1,050.00
/3F3 Er PF contribution     01/2010                    0.00             509.00
/3F5 Ee Mon PF contribution 01/2010                    0.00           1,050.00
/3F6 Ee Ann PF contribution 01/2010                    0.00          12,600.00
/3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,00 01/2010                    0.00              96.25
/3FA PF basis for Ee contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
/3F4 Er Pension contributio 01/2010                    0.00             541.00
/3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
/3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
/3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
/3R3 Metro HRA Basis Amount 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
1BAS Basic Salary           01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
RT table for year 2009. DOL 27.10.2009
                                                                                /111 EPF Basis              07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
/139 VPF Basis              07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
/3F1 Ee PF contribution     07/2009                    0.00           1,082.00
/3F3 Er PF contribution     07/2009                    0.00             628.00
/3F5 Ee Mon PF contribution 07/2009                    0.00           1,082.00
/3F6 Ee Ann PF contribution 07/2009                    0.00           8,822.00
/3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,00 07/2009                    0.00              99.18
/3FA PF basis for Ee contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
/3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
/3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
/3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00
/3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
/3FC Pension Basis for Er c 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00
/3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
/3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00
/3R4 Non-metro HRA Basis Am 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
1BAS Basic Salary           07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
Now please suggest what to do. where is the problem ? If have also checked EXIT_HINCALC0_002 but nothing written in it.
With Regards
Ashwani

Mid month joiners PF Projection Issue

Hi Team,
We have an issue with respect to PF Projection for the employees who joined in mid month. We are on actual basis as an income tax projection.
Employee joined on 16.04.2014 and his basic is 20,000 rupees. Since he joined in mid month his PF will be deducted as 1200. Now the system is projecting under Aggregate chapter VI as 1200+2400*11 = 27600 which is incorrect. It should do as 1200+1200*11 = 14400
We are not sure why system Is behaving weird. If anybody come across this situation, please let us know.
Thanks and Regards,
Siva.

Hello,
Please note that proration in case of mid month termination and joining
will be applicable to PF eligible pay alongwith EPF basis.
This is the standard behaviour of the system.
Please go through the below explanation on the proration of PF
PF will be prorated if there is a mid month joinee or mid month
termination. In Case of LOP the Eligible Pay is not prorated.
If the pension basis is eligible pay which is maintained in T511P in the
constant PFBAS and currently having the value as 6500 then, in the case
of mid month joining 6500 gets prorated for the number of days employee
was in the trust.
In the case of mid month joining/leaving or transfer scenarios, the PF
Basis will be correspondingly prorated and so the contribution
calculated will also be prorated.
If the customer doesn't want this pension basis to be prorated then a
User Exit: Override Employer Pension Basis has been provided in payroll
function INEPF. The name of the exit is EXIT_HINCALC0_002. This exit is
in the enhancement HRINCEPF. We request you to go through the
documentation of this user exit at
Payroll India > Statutory Social Contribution > Provident Fund >
User Exit: Override Employer Pension Basis
With Regards,
Chetan

Mid Month Transfer Issue in Payroll

Hello All
Good Day!
We have two payrolls defined, Payroll A and Payroll B and both has separate Legal entity but Business Group for both Payroll is same. We are having an issue when employee transfers from Payroll A to B or vice versa as mentioned below :
1) Lets assume Employee transfers from Payroll A to Payroll B as on 17 Oct 2012.
2) As Business Group is same , employee remain in the same BG.
3) So we tried to terminate the employee as on 17-Oct-2012 and re-hired as on 18-Oct-2012 in the Payroll B. We need two IRP5 (tax certificate) so we need to terminate the employee from one payroll and reinstate in new payroll.
4)) We have most of the recurring element configured to Terminate as Last Standard Process so all the recurring elements ended as on 31-Oct-2012, i think this should have been Actual Termination Date but as Payroll is running from last 2 years so this will be too big to change now.
5) Now when we process the payroll as on 31-Oct-2012, employee got full month salary in Payroll A which is not correct as employee worked up to 17-Oct-2012.
6) To avoid full month Salary, we changed the Last Standard Process to 17-Oct-2012 so all elements ended as on 17-Oct-2012 but now when we process the payroll as on 31-Oct-2012, employee is getting picked up but no element processed and no balance generated. Don’t know why ?
Could you please provide your input as what is the best practice to handle this mid month transfer ?
Thanks
Gaurav

Hi, Gaurav..
6) To avoid full month Salary, we changed the Last Standard Process to 17-Oct-2012 so all elements ended as on 17-Oct-2012 but now when we process the payroll as on 31-Oct-2012, employee is getting picked up but no element processed and no balance generated. Don’t know why ?
=>I guess.. The "Final Process Date" set as 31-Oct-2012 when you end this employee, isn't it?
Actual Termination Date will let person end at this date, that's mean person record's effective_end_date will equal to the Actual Termination Date and create a new person record after Actual Termination Date.
Last Standard Process Date let all elements ended as this date.
Final Process Date means you can process payroll run before this date, and the assignment record's effective_end_date will equal to Final Process Date. That's why your payroll run includes this person. There's no elements because all elements ended on 17-Oct-2012, system doesn't get any element on 31-Oct-2012.
Best Regards,
Changhua

Pension and mid-month hiring

Dear Experts,
A person was hired in mid-month, the 15th.
Payable earnings is 4480
The schema is referencing the correct wage type /103
in payroll the amount for the pension of 2480.85 x 6.9% = 171.18. But it should be 309.12
a pcr was created for special cumulations into/103 that reads as follows;
- 3
    - /103 PF APPL. EARNINGS
          WPALL FRST
          ADDWT *
There's no other wage type that has that amount. anks
How do we get teh calculation for the 309.12 to result?
Many thanks,
M

I must forewarn you that I am not familiar with IT0150.
In your initial post, you had mentioned a pcr as
- 3      - /103 PF APPL. EARNINGS
          WPALL FRST
          ADDWT *
This implies that if WT /103 exists in more than one "split", then only it's values (RTE/NUM/AMT) for the first split will be kept in the Input Table, that is if that are all options for the pcr.
Regarding pcr ZVA1, you should first look into the Input Table that is read by the pcr to check the values of /103 and of /809 (Constant GENAU should have a value of 100,000.00). As mentioned by Frances, this is a Custom pcr that will prorate the amount paid. It was created to respond to a requirement, but if I understand you correctly, you would like the payment not to be prorated when the employee is hired in the current month.
Do you have a WT or a temporary variable that indicates that the employee has been hired in the current month?

PF calulation wrong in mid month joiners

Dear Experts
As per the client requirement PF Contribution on "Eligible pay or PF basis which ever is less" i.e Basic 6500 and Contribution 780/- only.
But in case of any one joined in Mid month with basic salary 9000 in this case PF calculation showing wrong (calculating on working days)
I want to deduct 780/- as PF Contribution for mid month joiners also.

Hi Mallikarjuna,
With "Eligibility pay or PF Basis whichever is less" option selected, PF contribution is the minimum of below 2 components
1. Actual basic salary of the employee
2. Eligible pay of the employee (eligible pay is INR 6500 and is maintained in constant PFBAS)
SAP by default pro-rates both these components for mid month joinees. Lets take an employee with DOJ 11.04.2014 and basic pay 12,000.
1. Pro-rated basic salary = 8,000 (12,000/30*20)
2. Pro-rated eligible pay = 4,333.33 (6,500/30*20)
PF calculated by SAP in this case is 12% of 4,333.33 = 520
Solution:
I understand that you do not want the eligible pay to be prorated. i.e. the PF contribution in above case should be 12% of 6,500 = 780
To achieve this, you will need to implement the user exit EXIT_HINCALC0_002 (Override Employer Pension Basis) in the Enhancement HRINCEPF. Replace the pro-rated eligible pay with the actual value of constant PFBAS in this. Refer the documentation in the below node of SPRO
Payroll>>Payroll:India>>Statutory Social Contribution>>Provident Fund>>User Exit: Override Employer Pension Basis
Regards
Ravi Patni

Changing Plan Mid-month "pro-rated" unclear and deceptive practice. C.S. offers no help

I recently found myself having to up my plan minutes for a family emergency. I went online and checked my usage I was at 394 minutes out of a 450 minute plan, so I elected to switch to the 900 plan minute for the month, ancipating I would go over in the next week. I was given options to back date it or start on that day, as I had clearly not gone over my alloted minutes, I chose to start it as of that day.
My Bill came and I received 69 dollars in minute overages. How was this explained, that by prorating the bill, they divide the cylcel in half, not only by "dollars" which seemed to be the explantion I received online, but by minutes. SO my minute alotment of 450 was reduced to 240 for those two weeks I oriignally had 450 minutes in. They billed as if that was my allowance therefore saying I now went over my plan by 154 minute which I was billed to the tune of 69.00 dollars, plus the addition of the monthly increase in plan.
My question to any logical rational intelligent person would be, why would someone choose to up there minute plan, before they went over, just to then be charged for minutes they would not have been had they not upped there plan to the next level. This defies common sense and any explanation would as well.
Customer service sadly would not even hear or understand this, only to say this is a valid "cost" and I should have read the "disclosure" statement or called if I had questions and not use online services. I asked both the operator and a supervisor for the terms of the disclosure agrement and neither could tell me what it said. However in reading billing question answers they respond "For example, if you changed rate plans during the middle of your billing cycle, your statement should contain a charge for the old rate plan (according to the number of days in your cycle that you were on the old rate plan) and the new rate plan. " yes that makes sense but no where does it say your minutes may be reduced up until this point and you may occur additional charges not already used. by ironically "increasing your minute plan".
I am waiting for a manager to return my call, As a long time customer of verizon whom have promoted them and the new iphone all over facebook and such to my friends I am very discouraged by this practice, and the lack of resolve.

Mike I appreciate that at least you are familiar with what the disclosure statement says, despite othert reps not being able to recite it. However the term "may" be in inself is Misleading, if "airtime" is prorated the statement should read "YOUR airtime MINUTES will be prorated and reduced to this point, possibly resulting in overages and additional charges" The wording is intentionally misleading. If it weren't MIke, why would anyone KNowingly select an option that would then cause them to owe an additional 69.00 dollars they didnt owe at the time, when UPPING their PLAN?
The fact that Customer Service Can't see that as a very real possiblity and just is dissmisive saying You should have read the disclosure statement., and it is a valid charge tells, me they run into this frequently and they have a script to read from to cover themselves, leaving the HUman Element out of the equation. It is sad enough I had to Up my plan only temporarily while dealing with a tragic family situation, to add insult to injury. To me the term "may" be prorated and "may" result in additional overages meant, that if I had gone over my minutes prior to the change I would be charged, because MIKE that is COMMON SENSE. and a REASONABLE person May think that. Cutomer Service Reps could at least acknowledge that as a very real Understanding of how that line could be interupted, and that a reasonable person would not otherwise increase their plan only to be charge for something they would not have otherwise been charged.
I am almost positive in the Future this wording will be Changed after the continued Myriad of complaints. From what I already understand the new "changing minutes and not plan" option already has changed it. SO why not make things right for long time loyal customers now. I actually want to reduce my plan back down now as it was a temporary emergency however I DONT dare do it mid month again, SO I will wait another 2 weeks and pay even more.
This is NOT ME and my misunderstanding, just googling the topic comes up with tons and tons of complaints, articles written on the topic and so fourth. I have been waiting days for someone as promised to call me back as well and that hasnt happened. I have talked to so many friends about this many verizon customers and all say this can't be right, because it DOESNT MAKE SENSE, despite it being "valid" as you say.

Mid month Hiring payroll

Hi,
There is a scenario, when we hire a person in mid month, so how payroll driver will calculate its payroll.
Do we need to run payroll twice for this employee.
Regards,
Kumar

Hi,
If it is monthly payroll, no need to run payroll in mid month, we can run the payroll as usual like end of the month(whenever we are running payroll that date).
For mid month of joinging employes, system will take care with the help of INP1 rule for india, XPPF rule for internaational.
No need to run twice payroll.
Based his/her joining date payment will be happen.
Regards
Devi.

How to prorate mid month emp termination

hey all,
i have some employees that are being terminated as of 15th Jan 2009 some as of 20th Jan 2009. How can one handle such situations in the basic salary calculation formulas in payroll.
all your comments are welcomed!

There was no proration logic.
So i went thru the R12 Help and i came across a sample formula that has given me some idea now this formula is working only when the employees join in the mid-month and it doesn't work for mid-month termination.
Please note the salary is not hourly its daily computation but payroll is callander month.
We have International HRMS (i.e. XX_LEGISLATION)
Following is the formula:
ALias ASG_GRADE as Emp_Grade
ALIAS BASIC_PAY_IN_USD_AMOUNT_IN_USD_ENTRY_VALUE AS BASIC_US
ALIAS EXCHANGE_RATE_USD_PAY_VALUE_ENTRY_VALUE AS EXCHANGE_RATE1
default for BASIC_US IS 0
default for Emp_Grade is 'A'
default for actual_salary is 0.0
default for EXCHANGE_RATE1 is 0
default for prorate_end is '01-JAN-1900' (date)
default for prorate_start is '01-JAN-1900' (date)
default for PAY_PROC_PERIOD_END_DATE IS '01-JAN-1950' (date)
default for PAY_PROC_PERIOD_START_DATE IS '01-JAN-1950' (date)
inputs are Pay_amt(number),Pay_amt_TZS(number),Pay_amt_USD(number),prorate_start (date), prorate_end (date), actual_salary (number),day_in_Month(number)
if (Emp_Grade='S1' OR Emp_Grade='S2' OR Emp_Grade='S3' OR Emp_Grade='S4' OR Emp_Grade='SA' OR Emp_Grade='SB' OR
Emp_Grade='SC' OR Emp_Grade='SD' OR Emp_Grade='SE' OR Emp_Grade='SS') then
if not(BASIC_US was defaulted) then
actual_salary =(BASIC_US)
l_amount = (BASIC_US)
message = 'Proration Start Date ' || TO_CHAR(prorate_start, 'DD-MON-YYYY')
IF (prorate_start was defaulted) then
prorate_start date is defaulted when no pro ration occurs. Therefore we
should just return Salary.
l_amount = l_amount
     Pay_amt=(l_amount)
     Pay_amt_USD=(l_amount)
     Pay_amt_TZS=(l_amount*EXCHANGE_RATE1)
else
l_days = days_between(prorate_end , prorate_start)+1
day_in_Month=days_between(PAY_PROC_PERIOD_END_DATE,PAY_PROC_PERIOD_START_DATE)+1
l_amount = (l_amount * l_days) / day_in_Month
     Pay_amt=(l_amount)
     Pay_amt_USD=(l_amount)
     Pay_amt_TZS=(l_amount*EXCHANGE_RATE1)
return l_amount, message,Pay_amt,Pay_amt_TZS,Pay_amt_USD
Appreciate all your responses/help/assistance!

Mid Month Payrollrun - while Employee Resignation

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for