MIGO for Issue

Dear Experts,
While getting reservation no for stock material in maintenance order, when user going to issue it through MIGO at store, at MIGO screen and in Material TAB, there is field called EQUIPMENT, so here after entering reservation number in system no equipment number is coming, for this what should be done, plz suggest.
Rip

HI
Why you have to go and enter the reservation number there?
In MIGO... A07 (Goods Issue).... R08 (Order)
Enter your order no :... it will list out the reserved components
or
Try to do with TCODE : MB1A (With respect to order)
Pl. Note : Once you given the order no. there, it will give the reservation no...
What are the parameters ur using in MIGO...
What Executable Action in Transaction MIGO and What Reference Document for MIGO Transaction u are using...???
- Pithan
Edited by: Pithan Pithan on Apr 6, 2009 3:37 PM

Similar Messages

Issue to make mandatory field(SELD/BBD and Date of manufactor)in migo for particular Material type and material Number starting with'1' series.

Hi friend,
i have issue regarding mandatory self life field (SELD/BBD and Date of manufactor)in migo for Batch Tab for particular Material start with '1' Series and material type.
i want to make mandatory above field during GR from migo..any one let me know exit or badi for that to full fill this goal..
Regard's,
shaikh Khalid.

Hi Shaikh
First of all Thread is not closed seconldy as a good practice if you have resolved your issue kindly document it here so that it may help someone in future
Nabheet

Return under Warranty (Tracking Line only) Should we use MIGO - Goods Issue

Return under Warranty (Tracking Line only) Should we use MIGO - Goods Issue when sending out Materials for repair or exchange under Warranty (Free)?

Please post it in SD/MM forum.

Migo for subcontracting po- Excise invoice is posted later to material docu

Dear all,
While we are doing migo for sub-contracting PO we are getting an error like this Excise invoice is posted later to material document.
process
1. Create subcontracting PO.
2. Issue material 541 MVT.
3. Create sub-contracting challan- dated 8-8-2010.
4. Migo date 8-8-2010.
while entering subcontracting challan no & year, error messege is coming as Excise invoice is posted later to material document.
Pls give solution.
Thnaks & regards
madhu

Hi,
You will have to post the MIGO at least one day after the creation of Excise Challan.
Regards,
Prashant Kolhatkar

Excise Tab in MIGO for import PO

Dear all
When doing MIGO for Import PO excise tab is not appearing for the material
I have maintained all the data in J1ID for the material and plant
already we use to capture EI for the same material and plant but this time this is creating issues
We have posted an inoice of planned delivery costs but no excise tab in MIGO
What might be the reason

>
cnranjith wrote:
> Dear all
>
> When doing MIGO for Import PO excise tab is not appearing for the material
>
> I have maintained all the data in J1ID for the material and plant
>
> already we use to capture EI for the same material and plant but this time this is creating issues
>
> We have posted an inoice of planned delivery costs but no excise tab in MIGO
>
> What might be the reason
First you have to post the Customs MIRO in case of import purchase...then go for MIGO...you will find excise tab will follow....
Regards,
Indranil

Excise Values in MIGO For MPN Materials

Hello,
While capturing the excise invoice for the MPN materials system is not picking the excise values. We are using the TAXINN procedure and i have maintianed the condition records for the Key combination country/Plant/Control Code/Taxcode (WE have created a condtion table for this key combination) and we also maintained the MPN materials in the J1ID also but it is not picking the values in the item tab. Taxes are caluclated in the Purchase order.
Note:
For the MPN Materials we have only three views maintained in the material master and it is not extended to any of the plant.
I have noticed that if use the other tax code which i maintained the condition records for Conidtion table 651 (key Combination of Country/Tax Code) the excise values are flowing in MIGO but if i use the tax code EA (Condition table 652 Key Combination: country/Plant/Control Code/Taxcode) we are not getting the excise values in MIGO
Please let me know if there is any configuration is missing.
Regards,
Kumar Rayudu
Edited by: Kumar Rayudu on Oct 1, 2009 2:10 PM
Edited by: Kumar Rayudu on Oct 1, 2009 5:19 PM

>
cnranjith wrote:
> Dear all
>
> When doing MIGO for Import PO excise tab is not appearing for the material
>
> I have maintained all the data in J1ID for the material and plant
>
> already we use to capture EI for the same material and plant but this time this is creating issues
>
> We have posted an inoice of planned delivery costs but no excise tab in MIGO
>
> What might be the reason
First you have to post the Customs MIRO in case of import purchase...then go for MIGO...you will find excise tab will follow....
Regards,
Indranil

Error while doing MIGO for a sub-contracted item

Hello to Everybody,
I am facing below problem -
Error : Incorrect CCtr <Cost Center Code> with this account (CCtr category must=D) for
<Item Code> , while doing MIGO. (for receiving sub-contracted item from vendor).
May I request for possible solution to above error ?
regards,

Dear Sanjay,
You can determine the cost object for the posting of the costs in the transaction OKB9.
Following thread should resolve this issue:
Re: cost of subcontracting
Regards,
Naveen.

Error while posting MIGO for HU-Inbound Delivery

Hi All
When am trying to post the MIGO for HU Inbound Delivery Creation, am getting an error saying "Required parameters missing when calling up module MARV_SINGLE_READ".
Following areas I have verifed:
The posting periods in MMRV shows current period.
The Number range for HU ID and Delivery type HID is maintained.
Now am looking for your expert opinion to resolve this issue.
Regards
K. Viswanathan

Are you getting the same error in transaction MB1C to create the delivery.Try in MB1C

Error in MB1C but works perfectly in MIGO for movement type 501.

Hi
I get an error in MB1C but works perfectly in MIGO for movement type 501
here is the error Account 353300 requires an assignment to a CO object.
I know for this if we add the co object in OKB9 it works.
But my question is - how it works in MIGO transaction but throws an error in MB1C
Any idea ? has any one faced this kind of an issue ? Please let me know.
Thanks
Dkmurthy

Hi
Are the entires same in both the transactions? Means did you check 353300 GL was hit when you posted through MIGO?
Check in FS00 - for GL account 353300 - under bank/interest tab - double click on field status variant -> under Additional account assignments - CO object is ticked as mandatory?
Thanks

ABAP Error:Illegal interruption of the event LOAD-OF-PROGRAM (in MIGO-Goods issue to Production)

Hi Experts,
while i am doing MIGO(Goods Issue to Production Order, I am getting the below ABAP Error:
Please give solution, It is urgent requirement.
THE ERROR IS:
Short text
     Illegal interruption of the event LOAD-OF-PROGRAM.
What happened?
     Error in the ABAP Application Program
     The current ABAP program "/MRSS/SAPLRAP_INT_OB" had to be terminated because it
      has come across a statement that unfortunately cannot be executed.
Error analysis
     During the flow of the event LOAD-OF-PROGRAM (event for the
     initialization of an ABAP program), a condition occurred under which
     the event was to be left early. This is not permitted as it would
     result in an inconsistent status in the ABAP program.
Trigger Location of Runtime Error
    Program /MRSS/SAPLRAP_INT_OB
    Include /MRSS/LRAP_INT_OBF00
    Row                                     34
    Module type                             (FORM)
    Module Name                             GLOBAL_INIT
Source Code Extract
Line SourceCde
    4
    5 *&---------------------------------------------------------------------*
    6 *&      Form global_init
    7 *&---------------------------------------------------------------------*
    8 *       text
    9 *----------------------------------------------------------------------*
   10 FORM global_init.
   11
   12 * local data
   13   DATA lv_badi_impl_exists TYPE flag.
   14
   15
   16 * get ref to BAdIs
   17   CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_instance "#EC CI_BADI_GETINST
   18     CHANGING
   19       instance = gv_ref_badi_inter_company.
   20 * CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_instance
   21 * CHANGING
   22 *      instance = gv_ref_badi_rap_back.
   23 * CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_instance
   24 *    CHANGING
   25 *      instance = gv_ref_badi_ps_int.
   26   CALL METHOD cl_exithandler=>get_instance "#EC CI_BADI_GETINST

Hi Rob thanks for your response. I thought about doing an OSS note however; I would think I would need to get the problem in config corrected first as it contradicts each other. The problem I am talking about is how they are to return material to vendor....I have never even seen this as a process in my 10 years....
Process.....when the PO is a return to vendor PO they go to migo and choose the goods receipt and mvmt type 101 and the system will default the 161 in the item level....the two are inconsistent. If I try to change the top level to a 161 mvmt (as this is what I am used to seeing) it gives the error that the PO is not a stock transport order... Would you agree that I should correct that problem first before creating an OSS note?

Enhancement in MIGO for Goods Movement

Hi Gurus,
I got a requirement to Create a 262 goods movement materials document with reference to a Sub-Contract GR for an account assigned Sub-Contract PO thru TCODE MIGO. The details are describe as follow:
Once the 101/543 GR movement is carried out, a 262 movement type needs to be executed to reverse the consumption of the material against the service order and bring it back to the inventory (open stock). This movement needs to be triggered once MIGO subcontractor goods receipt -101/543 is committed (saved).
When the 101/543 GR movement transaction MIGO is saved-
1.     User exit needs to be invoked
2.     Check if the GR is
o     for an account assigned (EKPO- KNTTP Acct Assignment Cat =F) Sub-Contract PO (EKPO- PSTYP Item Category L)
o     AND the service order number (AUFNR) exists in ZXXXXXX (ZSUBCON_VALIDATION) table
3.     Identify the line item material in the goods receipt document (First item /against movement type 101),
4.     Identify the service order number (AUFNR) from ZSUBCON_VALIDATION table.
5.     Call the goods issue (262) transaction via the BAPI using the material derived via step 3 and against the service order number derived via step 4. BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE post goods movements

Hi Matt,
There are lots of Exits and BADI available in this transaction. See which suits you.
Enhancement
MB_CF001                                Customer Function Exit in the Case of Updating a Mat. Doc.
MBCF0011                                Read from RESB and RKPF for print list in MB26
MBCF0010                                Customer exit: Create reservation BAPI_RESERVATION_CREATE1
MBCF0009                                Filling the storage location field
MBCF0007                                Customer function exit: Updating a reservation
MBCF0006                                Customer function for WBS element
MBCF0005                                Material document item for goods receipt/issue slip
MBCF0002                                Customer function exit: Segment text in material doc. item
Business Add-in
MB_DOCUMENT_UPDATE                      BADI when updating material document: MSEG and MKPF
MB_DOC_BADI_INTERNAL                    BAdIs During Creation of a Material Document (SAP Internal)
MB_ME_CSGMT_BADI_SAP                    BAdI: Consignment Processing - Stock Transfer
MB_MIGO_BADI                            BAdI in MIGO for External Detail Subscreens
MB_MIGO_ITEM_BADI                       BAdI in MIGO for Changing Item Data
MB_PHYSINV_INTERNAL                     Connection: Core Inventory and Retail AddOn
MB_QUAN_CHECK_BADI                      BAdI: Item Data at Time of Quantity Check
MB_RESERVATION_BADI                     MB21/MB22: Check and Complete Dialog Data
MB_RESERVATION_SCR                      Screen BAdI for Retrofit DFPS
MB_RESERVATION_UPCHD                    BAdI for Creation and Changing of Manual Reservations
MB_RES_BAPI_CHANGE                      BAdI: Execution of Changes to Reservation Fields
MB_RES_BAPI_CREATE1                     BAdI: Adoption of Customer's Own Fields as Reserv. Fields
MB_RES_BAPI_DETAIL1                     BAdI: Display of Customer's Own Fields in Reservations
MB_STOR_LOC_BADI_GTS                    BADI to Check and Change Storage Location (GTS Fct. Only)
MB_DOCUMENT_BADI_SAP                    BADI for Creation and Changing of a Material Document
ARC_MM_EBAN_CHECK                       BAdI: Enhancement of Archivability Check (MM_EBAN)
ARC_MM_EBAN_PRECHECK                    BAdI: Enhancement of Archivability Check (MM_EBAN)
ARC_MM_EBAN_WRITE                       BAdI: Enhancement of Scope of Archiving (MM_EBAN)
ARC_MM_EINA_CHECK                       BAdI: Enhancement of Archivability Check (MM_EINA)
ARC_MM_EINA_WRITE                       BAdI: Enhancement of Scope of Archiving (MM_EINA)
ARC_MM_INVBEL_CHECK                     BAdI: Enhancement of Archivability Check (MM_INVBEL)
ARC_MM_INVBEL_WRITE                     BAdI: Enhancement of Scope of Archiving (MM_INVBEL)
ARC_MM_MATBEL_CHECK                     Prüfung ADD-ON-spezifischer Kriterien für MM_MATBEL
ARC_MM_MATBEL_WRITE                     Check Add-On-Specific Data for MM_MATBEL
MB_CHECK_LINE_BADI                      BAdI: Check Line Before Copying to the Blocking Tables
MB_CIN_LMBMBU04                         posting of gr
MB_CIN_MM07MFB7                         BAdI for India Version exit in include MM07MFB7
MB_CIN_MM07MFB7_QTY                     Proposal of quantity from Excise invoice in GR
MB_DOCUMENT_BADI                        BAdIs During Creation of a Material Document
Regards,
Atish

MIGO- Goods Issue- Order, the value is not written into Table COSP

Hi,
We make a substitution of wbs element of line item( BSEG-PROJK ). The wbs filed will be filled automatically when the user input a cost center or a order number.
But we found some inconsistency in standard report S_ALR_87013558 OR CJI3.
The following is what we have done:
In Tcode F-02, we enter a order(e.g. A), then the WBS Element is filled automatically. when we post the document, and go to Standard report: S_ALR_87013558,
we can see the amount in the report.
In MIGO, we make a goods issue by order(e.g. A. Movement type is 261) , when we post, Material Document and Accounting document and Controlling document , but in report S_ALR_87013558 or CJI3. the amount is wrong, we can not see the amount we have done in MIGO.
The movement type 201 is also wrong, the value is also not written into tabl cosp.
But GI for project-movement type 221, the value is written into table cosp.
Can you tell me this is wrong or right? if right, why? if wrong, how can i correct it, i need some customizing or others? or my substitution affect the result?
Best Regards
qingda

Sorry, not reply these days.
And very thanks for all your replies.
I am a abaper, not familiar with the business.
The business consultant want to control budget, control cost.
At first, he let me do a substibution in FI line item of besg-projk(WBS Element), when we he test the substitution in TCode F-02, the WBS field is filled automatically as per G/L account and Cost Center or as per G/L Account and Order, and then in Standard Report 'S_ALR_87013558', we can see the changes of the cost.
But when biz consultant do a MIGO->Goods Issue by order, we can not see the changes of the cost,but the value of WBS in FI Accounting Document is substituted correctly.
And if we enter the WBS manually when we do a MIGO->Goods Issue by order, we can see the changes of the report 'S_ALR_87013558'.
In the original post, i was wrong, when we do a goods issue with movement type 201, the result is the same as 261, also we cant see the changes. but if we enter the wbs manually(movement type 201),the changes is write to COSP table.
The solution about the original requirement is right or wrong?
Thank You All.
Best Regards
qingda

Disable or Validate Order or Cost center in MIGO for Mvmt type 201/261

Hi All,
I want to disable or validate 'Order' field in MIGO for the goods issue if the movement type is 201.
I want to disable or validate 'Cost Center' field in MIGO for the goods issue if the movement type is 261.
User do not want 'Order' field in MIGO for movement type 201 & User do not want 'Cost centre' field in MIGO for movement type 261.
Thanks
Pabi

Hi
go to OMJJ
here select move type and then give move type 201
now select 201 and click on Field selection (ENJOY)
now just remove the order field from here
similarly do for 261 movememt
this will affect to whole client

Error messge in migo for import procurement

Hi
Gurus
I have two issues related to import procurement
We pass Customs duty first i.e MIRO for a given quantity. then we do GR ( MIGO) with ref to the commercial invoice pop up at migo.
Here i want a check ( a error message) once the quantity of that Invoice no is completed.Please let me know how to do message setting for the same.
Secondly when iam entering the customs value in INR in MIRO, the same amount must flow in MIGO, but instead the value is flowing with exchange rate .What are the settings so that the same or proportianate value entered in MIRO for customs will flow in MIGO.
thanks in advance
Chris

>
cnranjith wrote:
> Dear all
>
> When doing MIGO for Import PO excise tab is not appearing for the material
>
> I have maintained all the data in J1ID for the material and plant
>
> already we use to capture EI for the same material and plant but this time this is creating issues
>
> We have posted an inoice of planned delivery costs but no excise tab in MIGO
>
> What might be the reason
First you have to post the Customs MIRO in case of import purchase...then go for MIGO...you will find excise tab will follow....
Regards,
Indranil

Note 951952 - Incorrect excise values if batch split in MIGO for import PO

Dear participants,
We have applied Note 951952 - Incorrect excise values if batch split in MIGO for import PO,
for following issue,
While doing import goods receipt for batch split quantity,
excise base value is calculating for entire amount not by splitted quantity.
We are unable to solve this issue.
We are using SAP ECC release 6.0 level 11 whether above mentioned note can be applied or else any other
new notes to apply solve this issue.
Advance thanks
Regards,
A.Jeyakanthan

Thanks for reply,will check note is applicable for current package level.
Actually we found excise base value is same for GR of batch split quantities for same material
with valuation type import duty free.

MIGO for Issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for