Posting Line Items after Archiving in SAP

Hi Experts,
I have a small query regarding SAP data archiving in Financial accounting data. I have archived Financial total records data for one fiscal year (2010), and that data is deleted from the SAP database. Now my client is trying to do catchup activity of posting some more new line items for the same fiscal year (2010), this data is not archived and available in the SAP database.
My Question is:
1. can client retrive both the data which is archived and not archived from the standard Transactions?
2. If it is possible, can client will get the consolidated values of line items (which are retrived from database as well as archive files) in the report resulted in retrival process to secure the balance carryforward function?
Please let me know if there are any standard recommendations or a workaround techniques to meet this business requirment.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Irrshaad.

Hi, you have stopped/end the process. Now you want to archive with the correct variant selection criteria. For this to be successful, please first change the customising that you require and then in SARA--> re-create a new variant with the correct selection criteria to archive your data.
Please ensure that in t.code <file> you have maintained all the logical file path, fine name, pysical path's maintained properly.
I Hope your problem will be resolved.

Similar Messages

System should not allow to delete PO line Item after GR/IR

Hi,
I am working on a SAP Retail Implementation project.
Currently the system is allowing us to delete the PO line items after doing GR or IR against that PO line item. But the clients requirement is that the system should not allow to delete PO line item after doing GR/IR.
We are using Account Assignment Category-N, Item Category-S.
Please let me know if you have the solution for this requirement.
Thanks in advance
Thanks & Regards,
Suresh

Hi,
Standard SAP will not allowed the PO to be deleted once it was GR done. The controlled is on the attributes of message to set as "E"
Message no. 06115
But if invoiced takes place, the is the point that PO can be deleted.
You have to do have a Enhancement using MM06E005, insert you logic here to check PO history tables like EKBE, then check if invoice " Q" (BEWTP) exist, the PO cannot be deleted once the user delete the PO line and SAVE it. Ask you developer to help you on the following coding.
Use MM06E005 and EXIT_SAPMM06E_012
IF SY-TCODE = 'ME22N'.
IF sy-ucomm = 'MESAVE' OR SY-UCOMM = 'YES'..
LOOP AT TEKPO.
IF TEKPO-LOEKZ = 'L'.
SELECT SINGLE BELNR FROM EKBE INTO BELNR1 WHERE EBELN = TEKPO-EBELN AND EBELP = TEKPO-EBELP AND BEWTP = 'E'.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
SELECT SINGLE BELNR FROM EKBE INTO BELNR2 WHERE EBELN = TEKPO-EBELN AND EBELP = TEKPO-EBELP AND BEWTP = 'Q'.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
Regards,

Can a deleted PO line item be archived?

Hi,
Is it possible to archive PO Line item after deletion? while the same PO can be active for other line items?
If yes
will be pleased to know the steps & any complexity involved?
Regards,
Vengat

Hi Venkat,
If the PO has more than one line item, and if you are looking for deleting a single line item and archive
this is not possible. All the line items relevant to that PO has to be complete., like GR/IR etc.,
Once all the relevant business transactions is complete, the PO can be deleted and then archived.
Hope this is helpful.
Regards,
Suresh

Posting line item currency different than header curency

Hi ALL,
Is there any way in SAP where I can post line items in a different currency that header currency?
for e.g. Doc header currency - USD
Line item 1 Dr A/c - Amount in USD
Line item 2 Cr A/C - Amount in CAD
Can you please let me know if it is possible to post in SAP?
Thanks,
Ram

Absolutely not possible.
Currency is at header level and not at line item level.
Regards,
SDNer

Miro line item after posted

Dear Forum,
After MIRO posted which with reference to PO, I create another new invoice with reference to the same PO again.
1 When PO number is entered, both quantity and amount fields empty and the item lines are still enabled despite invoice already posted. Why?
2 What would be the impact if I enter quantity and amount again?
Thanks

Dear Srina,
1. As per SAP standard, amount & qty field is not view mode. Reason is we are allowed to make any changes if there is any partial postings. System will show the line item without any value or qty in that particular line item if it has been already posted because originally both field is enable mode. If you want you can make this field grayed out with abapers help BUT you can't do any partial postings.
2. You can enter value & qty is empty field and click post but system will give you warning message saying that plz check is there invoice posted. You can post again by ignoring this warning message. Means you will have double invoice for said line item. Probably you may make warning message to error message so that system might disallow you to do so. Believe this help your queries. TQ
rgds,
nanthakumar

Due to deleted Sales order line items and Archived Sales order is still showing as Incomplete in BW as Open Order reports because of Incorrect SAP R/3 Rejection Status("A") in VBUP table.

In a archived saler Order user had deleted Line Item and completed overall sales order. Now this sales order is archived, but it is stll appearing in BW report as open order because of deleted item with rejection Status is maintained as “A” (Not yet Processed).
We want to change this status from "A" (Not yet Processed) to "C" as completed.
I have tried to reload Archive data but due to some limitation I was not able to do it. Also I feel this will like this s not the proper way to do it.
Could you please help me to correct way to do it???
Thanks in advance....

Hi Vaibhav,
If you can get the list of Sales orders which has deleted line items and force completion status. You can manage them in BI via lookup or navigation attribute.
Just my views I am sharing .
Thanks,
KDJ

Manual account clear but can see line item after post document

Hi Guru!
I have post account clear with transaction code F-03 with open item zero balance such as
account 214001 balance +500
account 214001 balance -500
when I simulate entry the system not show line item for post document but can post it . I want to know why ?
thank you very much .

Dear,
This is standard behaviour...if line item which you are clearing have zero balance then system will not show any line items since open itemss are cleared....
when you have tolerance difference or the residual posting then only system will show the line item....
Regards,
Chintan Joshi

Line Item: After reading all your links and discussions

From the links and the discussions I was referred to in a previous post, please correct me if I am wrong. I understood that with if a characteristic is going to have several values (defined in that case as "has cardinality"), then it is better to make that characteristic a line item.
It has some advantages as a result of the fact that the line item dimension has no dimension table but only SID table.
1--Does this make loading data faster Or, running queries faster?
2--I also read that "line dimension on means that this dimension becomes part of fact table", can you explain this?
3--Some of the experts said you create line item when the characteristics in the dimension is 20 or 30 % that of the fact table. Is this 20 or 30? And, are we comparing all the characteristics in all the dimensions in the Cube or just the one dimension which we want to make the line item?
4--Also, I get the 20 or 30% of the Dimension but what it being compared to in the Fact Table?
5--I didn't get the cardinality stuff well so any hints other than links will help.
6--Finally, won't this easily make the designer run out of the 13 (16-3 reserved) available dimensions?
7--If the Rule of thumb is dimension table size should be smaller than fact table, and line item dimensions makes this possible, isn't it in the same token killing the ratio of 16 dimension to 1 Fact table in a cube?
8--Is this a consideration after data has been loaded into Cubes or during the design phase of the Cube?
9--If this consideration is applicable only when there is data then how can you factor this into your design? How to wait until you are in trouble to fix the problem?
Thanks

HI Caud,
1] Query reading performance will be improved. As it can access only Master data table and Fact table.
Setting it as a Line Item dim also causes a b-tree index to be built instead of a bitmap index, but also embeds SID directly in the fact table, eliminating the dimension table.
2] Line item Diemsion- when ever ur Dimension table contains a single Char then it is better to join ur master data table with the Fact table. So there will be connection with SID.
3]U chooses the line item when ever there is a high cardinality. i.e if ur DIM table is 10%of Fact table then u will go with the Line item Dim.
the percentage is w.r.t the number of records.
4] its total number of records.
5]Cardinality creates indexes on the Dimension table entries and there by you would see an improvement in performance.
With Cardinality, you can assign a Dimension containing Multiple Characteristics
6] It depends based ur business requirement and the type of data that u use.
8] It is before loading into the cube.
9]it is better to design at the initial stage it self.
Refer this link..
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/a7/d50f395fc8cb7fe10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
Regards-
MM
Assign points if it helps.
It is better to assign points to all who ever replies to u. As they spent lot of time on these Threads.
Message was edited by: vishnuC

Purchase Orders - Updating Line Items After a Portion Has Been Received

Is there any way to make a line item editable on a purchase order if only a portion of it has been received?
Basically, our company will create a Purchase Order in SAP, which goes to our office in Hong Kong to arrange shipment. These Purchase orders will, many times, have multiple items listed at, let's say, 10,000 pieces each. Each of the items may ship on different dates due to our request for different dates or due to limited container space. So really...each item on the Purchase Order is like a "mini purchase order"... as I like to call it.
So, when we have a situation where only 5,000 of a specified item has been sent, we create a Goods Receipt for that amount...making that line item un-editable on the Purchase Order.
I would like for it to be editable so that I can add/change the the "Status Update" column I created (this is for our sales reps to be able to determine when product should be arriving).
The only solution I can think of is readjusting the quantities right when we know they will be split...so by the time they arrive (usually a month after they are shipped from Hong Kong), the quantities are already separated out in the system.
Only thing is, I have to be REALLY careful not to mess up the original order...or confuse things.
Any suggestions??

There is a good reason that a line item will become non-editable on a purchase order if a portion of it has been received.
Do not fight with system. If possible, change the order to small one from the beginning. That would be much better.
Thanks,
Gordon

FS10N - Not displaying line items for Archiving document

Hi Experts,
When we are double clicking on the FS10N accont display balance report to get line item reprot, it is not displaying archived document data. We have also deleted secondary indexes for those archived document.
We are able to get same report while using FBL3N with Archive info structure loaded with data.
Please suggest how to do FS10N archive enabled?
Thanks,
SamirV.

Hi Samir,
You should look at the following SAP notes and implement the corrections:
792515
776164
and 831568 (if you use business areas)
Regards,
Eli

FI Posting line Items

Dear all,
It,s a very urgent......I want know maximam how much line item we have to post at time of MIRO in planned delivery cost.And where is the SAP setting for that?
I have facing following problem........
In my import PO three condition 1) Custom duty 2) Vat input & 3) Whithholding Tax. So that If in one PO suppose 400 line items, then at the time of MIRO for planned delivery cost toral 400 * 3 = 1200 line items that time system given a message error like- Maximum number of items in FI reached.
Please give the suggetion.
Thanks & Regards,
Vinay Patel

Hi
you can post up to maximum 999 line entries in FI document.
System response
FI documents have a 3-digit item counter that limits the number of items permitted per document.
If the documents with an excessive number of items come from another application area (e.g. sales, logistics, order accounting), you can configure the system to the effect that these documents are summarized in FI.
To overcome this, the only way was to break the accounting invoices, 1 with 950 items and the other with the rest.
Regards
Ramakrishna

Accounting entry line item after 561 movement type

Hi,
I have create initial stock uplaod with MB1C with movement type 561, for 4 materials after post of document it is posted properly with proper amount but when I check the accounting entry it shows me in the amount in two diffrent debit and credits even the valuation class of all the 4 material is same.
Debit material account, addition of amount of three materials
credit initial stock account, addition of amount of three materials
debit material account of 4th item
credit initial stock uplaod as per amount of 4th item,
I want to know why in first entry systen added 3 material amount in one and in second entry amount of only 4th item, when I check the entry in table BSEG ,the second entry is posted along with business area 0001 where as for the first entry the business are field in the table is blank even the business area is set the company code and plant level, and only single business area we are using in the system.
regards,
zafar

As you mentioned you have a separate business area this is the reason for posting the entries separately. This is the same case with profit center also (if different PC's are maintained for different material). Also system will proportionately calculate the other expenses (if any) and post in a separate line items in accounting document.
Regards
Ayyallas

Table for tax code line item after miro

Can anybody tell table for tax code line item (other than BSET) after MIRO.
Raj

Hi,
First let me explain you the logic in this repot.
If a document have more than one GL accounts relevant for tax and having the same tax code. So there is only one tax line for that tax code in BSET.
Now in the standard reports like S_ALR_87012357, output has the tax base amount etc, based on tax line from BSET which is a single line the above document. However this single line contains multiple tax relevant account and thus SAP can not show all the G/L account for this single line in the report S_ALR_87012357. So SAP picks up the first account in the output.
The declaration in this report is not wrong, as the total gets calculated based on the tax code and which is correct and meets the tax reporting requirement.
If you want to see the G/L account wise output, you can use the program RFUMSV10. Refer OSS note 1175418 "RFUMSV00: G/L account display" for details.
https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/sapnotes/index2.htm?numm=1175418
In your report, you can use this program logic for reference.
Regards,
Gaurav

Sorting Invoice line items after they've been summed

Hi,
I'm working on a template for the out-of-box invoice using the XML it generates. The body of the document contains the line items, and I've successfully been able to print and sum (net amount and tax) these line items by Item Description and Unit Price using the following code:
<?for-each@section:G_INVOICE?>
<?for-each-group:G_LINE_TOTAL;./LIST_G_LINES/G_LINES/LINE_ITEM_DESCRIPTION[../LINE_TYPE='LINE']?>
<?for-each-group:current-group();./LIST_G_LINES/G_LINES/LINE_UNIT_SELLING_PRICE[../LINE_TYPE='LINE']?>
<?./LIST_G_LINES/G_LINES/LINE_ITEM_DESCRIPTION[../LINE_TYPE='LINE']?>
<?sum(current-group()/./LIST_G_LINES/G_LINES/LINE_QTY_INVOICED[../LINE_TYPE='LINE'])?>
<?./LIST_G_LINES/G_LINES/LINE_UNIT_SELLING_PRICE[../LINE_TYPE='LINE']?>
<?sum(current-group()/./LIST_G_LINES/G_LINES/LINE_ITEM_AMOUNT[../LINE_TYPE='LINE'])?>
<?sum(current-group()/./LIST_G_LINES/G_LINES/LINE_EXTENDED_AMOUNT[../LINE_TYPE='TAX'])?>
What I need to do now is also SORT the summed line items by Item Description and Unit Price, but everything I've tried is giving me errors.
One thing I've tried is adding the SORT command to the element that is printing the Item Description as in the following:
<?sort:./LIST_G_LINES/G_LINES/LINE_ITEM_DESCRIPTION[../LINE_TYPE='LINE'];'ascending';data-type='text'?>
I've also tried adding a separate field to do the sorting, but I'm getting different errors then.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions.

Thanks! This helped to some extent.
Adding the sort for the LINE_ITEM_DESCRIPTION after the for-each-group for it worked to sort the lines by item description, but when I added the sort command for the LINE_UNIT_SELLING_PRICE within its for-each-group, I get the following error:
FOProcessor setLocale: en-us
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
     at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.apps.xdo.common.xml.XSLT10gR1.invokeProcessXSL(XSLT10gR1.java:593)
     at oracle.apps.xdo.common.xml.XSLT10gR1.transform(XSLT10gR1.java:390)
     at oracle.apps.xdo.common.xml.XSLT10gR1.transform(XSLT10gR1.java:208)
     at oracle.apps.xdo.common.xml.XSLTWrapper.transform(XSLTWrapper.java:161)
     at oracle.apps.xdo.template.fo.util.FOUtility.generateFO(FOUtility.java:1019)
     at oracle.apps.xdo.template.fo.util.FOUtility.generateFO(FOUtility.java:972)
     at oracle.apps.xdo.template.fo.util.FOUtility.generateFO(FOUtility.java:211)
     at oracle.apps.xdo.template.FOProcessor.createFO(FOProcessor.java:1577)
     at oracle.apps.xdo.template.FOProcessor.generate(FOProcessor.java:952)
     at RTF2PDF.runRTFto(RTF2PDF.java:626)
     at RTF2PDF.runXDO(RTF2PDF.java:460)
     at RTF2PDF.main(RTF2PDF.java:251)
Caused by: java.util.EmptyStackException
     at java.util.Stack.peek(Unknown Source)
     at java.util.Stack.pop(Unknown Source)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLTContext.popCurrentGroupingKey(XSLTContext.java:905)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLForEachGroup.processGroups(XSLForEachGroup.java:468)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLForEachGroup.process01(XSLForEachGroup.java:282)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLForEachGroup.process(XSLForEachGroup.java:210)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLForEachGroup.processAction(XSLForEachGroup.java:94)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLNode.processChildren(XSLNode.java:417)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLForEachGroup.processGroups(XSLForEachGroup.java:465)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLForEachGroup.process01(XSLForEachGroup.java:282)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLForEachGroup.process(XSLForEachGroup.java:210)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLForEachGroup.processAction(XSLForEachGroup.java:94)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLNode.processChildren(XSLNode.java:417)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLResultElement.processAction(XSLResultElement.java:180)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLNode.processChildren(XSLNode.java:417)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLResultElement.processAction(XSLResultElement.java:180)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLNode.processChildren(XSLNode.java:417)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLResultElement.processAction(XSLResultElement.java:180)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLNode.processChildren(XSLNode.java:417)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLResultElement.processAction(XSLResultElement.java:180)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLNode.processChildren(XSLNode.java:417)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLResultElement.processAction(XSLResultElement.java:180)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLNode.processChildren(XSLNode.java:417)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLForEach.processAction(XSLForEach.java:142)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLNode.processChildren(XSLNode.java:417)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLResultElement.processAction(XSLResultElement.java:180)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLNode.processChildren(XSLNode.java:417)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLTemplate.processAction(XSLTemplate.java:191)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLStylesheet.execute(XSLStylesheet.java:508)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLStylesheet.execute(XSLStylesheet.java:485)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLProcessor.processXSL(XSLProcessor.java:264)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLProcessor.processXSL(XSLProcessor.java:150)
     at oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XSLProcessor.processXSL(XSLProcessor.java:187)
     ... 16 more
I would appreciate to know what is wrong with this and, also, how to interpret these errors.....is there any sort of error code manual?

MIGO BADI - Check line item after clicking on ITEM_OK Field in MIGO

Hi,
I am looking for Enhanacement option for MIGO Transaction . What i found it, there is one Badi MB_MIGO_BADI at the creation of material document. When i click on ITEM_OK Field at material line item level. and click on CHECK Button, i want to check material master if that material is having QM View or not . That i can write in one of the method in badi which i found is CHECK_ITEM bt that method is having parameter called I_LINE_ID which have line item no. bt how should i get material doc. no and material no. at that line item?
Plz try to give me solution.
Thanks & Regards,
Saurin Shah

Hi,
When you are posting a GR against PO when you check the document
Method Line_modify of the badi MB_MIGO_BADI is gettin triggered and if you check the importing parameter cs_goitem
it is getting populated wit the values of the lime item
Like you said material no, po number, batch no, item no etc.
Since you can get this details as you said you can check for the view maintained.
Hope this help you.
Regards,
Ranjith N

Posting Line Items after Archiving in SAP

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for