MIRO PROBLEM IN FREIGHT CALCULATION

DearAll,
user have to do MIRO for a P.O , GRN done , User had done IV for material cost , but for Freight he is doing IV the weight of mat P.O is 1700kg & charges for freight are Rs 4000/-, but good reciept is for 1670kg as per invoice problem is that the frieight cal in MIRO Is only 3929/- instead of 4000/- here the fr. cal is as per the qty rcvd but for transporter we have to pay Rs4000/-.pl reply.
regards
sap11

can u help me that any other method can solve this issue .?
can freight be made independent of qty rcvd, as of now the freight cal is 3929 it is as per qty rcvd but we have to pay frght as 4000 as in invoice it is written simply to pay freight as Rs.4000/-irrespective of qty but system is calc as per qty rcvd.
pl help to come out of this
sap11

Similar Messages

Invoice(miro) problem

Dear all,
We have created po with freight cost while doing miro for po freight cost Ex 200.rrs for this excise duties are calculating for freight cost how to deactivate the duties.
Following are the prices
Poqty-10
Price-1815 per each piece
toatl-18,150
duties bed 10%-1815
edycess 2% -36.30
S& Heducess-18.15
total-20,019.45
cst 2%(nondeductabele)-400.39
feright-200.55
while making miro foeewing wntries are created
vendor-credit-20620.309
gr/ir-18550.39-debit
feright-clearing-200.55-v0 taxcode
cenvatclearing bed-1815debit
cenvatclearing edcess-36.30debit
cenvatclearing scess-18.15 debit
again here for freight
cenvat clearing 2% on freight basevalue -0.40debit(taking 10% freight value is 20.55))-v0 taxcode
cenvat clearing 1%on freight base value-0.20-vo tax code
Please help on this
Regards,
Bhaskar

closed

Problem with the calculator and modifications needed

i have got a problem with the calculator on my iphone i.e i cannot find any DEL key or Backspace....the problem is when typing a long value if one number is entered wrong we should start again.
EXAMPLE...if i need to type 114678047 * 345612
if acidentally if i type 114678047 * 3455 ( then i should start over typing "C" key)
i should start over to type the whole data..if we have a delete key we can just correct it right away and continue.....rather than starting over
we can find this feature in all the other smart phones , i dont know why apple coudnt find that
even every scientific calculator have a DEL key...
Thanks
vickyk7

FEEDBACK
If you want to give Apple feed back then do it here http://www.apple.com/feedback/iphone.html

Freight Calculation based on the net value of the Line item

Hi SAP Gurus,
I have one requirement for Freight calculation(Sales order is created through an IDOC) :
In the idoc,we will receive a freight dollar amount - which will be the total amount of freight.(example 100)
We will also receive sales dollar for each line item ,which is then passed to the pricing procedure, for a total amount of sales for that Sales order.
(examples below, for a total of 1500)
The 100 is to be posted to a freight G/L account.
The 100 is further divided by each profit center of the materials on the Sales order.
The freight is split out amongst the profit center , based on the net value of the line item.
Freight value to be allocated = Line item value/total value of the sales order * Freight amount.
Total of the sales order =1500
     Line item value     Freight value calculation     Profit center
Material A:      800          800/1500*100 = 53     Profit center A
Material B:     500          500/1500*100 = 33     Profit center B
Material C:      200          200/1500*100 = 13     Profit center C
Please let me know how to achieve this functionality in pricing procedure or what changes i need to make in Freight condition type.
Thanks in advance,
Bhakar Saha

Were you able to resolve this issue of allocating freight costs to line items/profit centers using the net value of the line items?

Freight Calculation basis Handling Unit in Delivery

Hi Expts.
Could anybody help me how to identify shipment cost (freight) on the basis of Number of Handling Unit in a Delivery.
Example:
1-One Delivery
2-Multiple quantity of material (10 qty)
3-Packed in multiple handling units (2 in one HU, 5 HU)
Freight calculation on the basis of handling units handled by freight forwarder.
Urgent help required.
Regards
AB

hi raja,
packing done at delivery and transfer order is used for packing an item at delivery level or at transfer order level that is at ware house management level.
packing material is normal material which you will use for packing purpose like
TV packing uses: polythene cover, thermocol sheets, then a carton and you will keep 10 TV's in one single pallet that is handling unit
please check SPRO config settings for multi level packings.
please take this link:
http://sdconfiguration.blogspot.com/2008/02/multi-level-packaging-in-delivery.html

Trip vise freight calculation

Hi all
Please guide me and put step by step config steps of trip vise freight calculation.
Best Regards
Parveen Kr. Thakur

Hello
FYI
Asking for a
step by step config steps
is a violation of forum rules
Kindly follow the following links for your reference:
- freight costs and graduated interval scales
- Pricing freight costs and graduated interval scales
Regards
JP

Customizing (Freight Calculation)

Hallo Friends,
Can anyone provide me with goodl, simply step by step example(s) in customizing of Freight calculation. If documents with screen-shots is available, please send to my E-Mail: [email protected]
Please no links!!
Blacky

hi,
freight is usally determined depending up on the incoterms you are using in the customer master data. in the sales area tab.
the freight can be maintained in 2 ways , one is at header level and 2nd is at the item level
if you want to maintain the freight at the header level we can use the condition type HD00 in the pricing procedure.since it is a header condition we do not maintain any condition records and the value is entered manually while processing the sales order.
if you want to maintain the freight at the item level . we can use the condition type KF00 in the pricing procedure and the conditions records are maintained. depending up on the value you maintain in the condition type the value will be raised when sales order is raised.
pls reward points if the answer is helpful
Regards,
Murali

MIRO problem for Second Stage dealer scenario

Hi All,
I have created a purchase order to the trader in which i have taken Inclusive of excise tax code.
Now while doing MIGO i have make a tick to MRP indicator also change the base value in excise tab & fill the fields of BED, ECS & HECS whatever vendor has pass on to me & post the document.
Now in MIRO also i have change the base value & simulate the document where the extra G/L of Inventory is appearing.
That amount is 2 % i.e. CST on GR/IR clearing amount of MIGO.
Because of that 2% amount less credited to vendor account.
Please help to resolve the issue.
Regards,
Nandkishor Nachane

Hi,
Since you are choosing the correct tax code @ the time of MIRO, the actual CST calculation is happening at the time of MIRO. Hence it will get posted to the inventory. Please check your MIGO/GR postings. I hope there wont be any CST calculation during GR since you have mentioned a dummy tax code in your PO.
Hope its clear.
As per my understanding the system behaviour is correct.
Thanks & Regards,

Problem with a calculated member browsing cube with a specific user role

Good evening to all of you .
I am not a newbie about SSAS nor an expert developer.
I use SSAS 2008 R2 Standard Edition.
I try to simplify my problem with a calculated measure.
I have a CUBE with :
[Measures].[Sales Amount]
Dimension STORES - Dimension CUSTOMERS - Dimension DATE
I have also 2 user roles :
Direction Role can see all members of all dimensions.
Customize Role has a restriction about Dimension STORES ..it can see only a STORE of all (Suppose to have 100 stores).
User that has a Customize Role, when browse cube in Excel , want to see for a specific CUSTOMER , Sales Amount of his own STORE but also the total Sales Amount of ALL STORES for that Customer...
Is it possibile to do that ???
Can you give any suggestion also using Adventure Works Cube ???
I was able to create a calculated measure like that below.
It does not work...It give the same result of Sales Amount
It seems that Customize Role win Always about every kind of calculate measure i need to create..
i.e SUM([STORES].[STORES].[ALL STORES],[Measures].[Sales Amount])
Thanks in advance.

Hi maretix,
According to your description, you have a customize role which limit the user can only see data about his own STORE. Now this user wants to see the total Sales Amount for his own STORES only. Right?
In Analysis Services, when granting custom access to dimension data, it has a option "Enable Visual Total" in Advanced dimension security. By default, the
VisualTotals property is disabled (set to False). This default setting maximizes performance because Analysis Services can quickly calculate the total of all cell values, instead of having to spend time selecting which
cells values to calculate. So you always get same result which is the total for all STORES.
In this scenario, please select this option. When you enable the VisualTotals property, your custom role can only view aggregated totals for dimension members to which the role has permission.
Reference:
Grant custom access to dimension data (Analysis Services)
If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
Best Regards,
Simon Hou
TechNet Community Support

Problem in VAT Calculation @ the time of MIRO

Dear All,
We are using the Tax Procedure TAXINN.
When we create a LIV document with ref to a PO using the transaction MIRO & when I check the calculate tax button, the tax amount which is displayed in the Basic data is more than the amount which is displayed in the taxes tab.
For Ex:
Created a PO with the following details.
Total Qty in PO - 10
Base Price - 1000/qty.
BED - 14% - 1400.00
ECS - 2% - 28.00
VAT - 4% - (4% on 11428) - 457.12
So my total Tax = 1885.12 (Including Excise & VAT).
Now when I create a MIRO document the tax amount which gets calculated when I check the Calculate button is 1885.12 (Same as above) in the Taxes tab of MIRO.
But the tax amount which is displayed in the Basic data tab is 1,942.24
Also when I simulated the MIRO entrys the VAT amount which was simulated was - 514.24 & not 457.12 as in PO.
Can anyone please advice on the reason for this mismatch in VAT calculation during the time of MIRO?
Is there any specific settings for VAT in TAXINN ??
Note :
The Excise & VAT are calculated correctly during the time of PO creation. Also I havent maintained any additional VAT condition types for my VAT in the tax procedure.
Awaiting helpful replies.
Regards,
Edited by: SAP FC on Dec 5, 2008 3:44 PM

Hi All,
Please note that when I removed the VAT condition type JVRD from the Classify condition types settings in IMG then the VAT amount which is calculated in the Basic data tab of MIRO is equal to the actual Tax amount as in PO (Excise + VAT ), but the amount which is displayed in the tax tab of MIRO is less.
Now if I maintain the Classify condition types settings in IMG for my VAT condtn type JVRD then the VAT amount which is calculated in basic data is more than both the PO as well as tax tab in MIRO.
Please note as you all have suggested I tried this after creating a new material & with the newly maintained condition records in FV11.
But still the issue persists..
If anyone have any idea. plz revert.
Regards,
Edited by: SAP FC on Dec 9, 2008 10:23 AM

MIRO Problem - 2nd Stage Dealer !!

HI
Our client buys lots of raw material from 1st stage & 2nd stage dealers. They pass on Excise credit to our client.
This amount of excise credit is not known at the time of creating a PO. So the PO has only VAT condition calculated by the tax code (TAXINJ).
( Vendor gives excise invoice during delivery)
During GR they just capture the excise amount and tick the MRP indicator as well.
Then excise amount is posted with J1IEX .
.... Now the problem is tht during MIRO when we see simulation the excise amount is not posted to excise account but goes to price variances and stock acnt(inventory)
.. This creates a problem in accnting .. a big headache for accnts people......
... Guys tell me if the process is right or wrong and tell me if any other solution possible
Thank You

Hi,
this is a common scenario in all purchase of exciseable goods in India. It is called commerically as E2 purchase.
at the time creation of PO the excise part is not known. the dealer passes you the excise from the manufacturer. at the time of goods receipt only you come to know about the excise details.
steps are:
1) create the PO with the dealer price and give Tax code as V0(Zero tax). if other conditions like discount, freight etc are there, give the value.
2) DO J1IEX, tick the MRP indicator, in the miscellanous TAB you will find vendor field also. this field is used to capture the vendor number from whom the excise invoice has come.
give the values of excise duties in the exciseTAB what is mentioned in your vendor excise invocie.
this way the system will correct your basic price.( as dealer price includes the excise duty)
3) at the time of MIRO, the system will default the value as mentioned in the PO.
here you have to change the value and give the correct tax code.
you will get the right posting.
This is the way SAP document says on dealer purchase.
I understand your headache.
You drop me your mailid at [email protected]
I will see you get this document today, I have to search or
give me a day or two I will send you the SAP document on dealer purchase.
Regards
Rajesh

Freight Calculation in Standard cost Run

Hi,
The requirement is while doing the standard cost calculation through CK11N / CK40N system should show seperately how much is freight plan cost &; how much is duty plan cost.e.g.
100 is material price as per condition PB00 Cost element 355100
10 is freight cost (ZFR1 10%) Cost element 363170
5 is duty cost (Zduty lets say 0.5%) Cost element 363171
So taotal cost will be 115
I wanted to get this in cost component wise. Client does not want manual intervention so do not want to go for additive cost method
I had tried through Purchasing info record. I have maintained the valuation variant accordingly. Assigned correct sub strategy to it & also maintained delivery cost button in the same screen to assign conditions to origin group.
Also I had maintained purchasing info record through me11 ; mainteined conditions there.
These above mentioned cost elements are mapped in cost component structure in T code OKTZ. Seperately for material ,freight &; duty
Now when I make a PO, system is showing correct calculation as per the conditions.When I do the GR the Freight &; duty is getting posted &; these GLs are having above mentioned primary cost elements . .So the primary cost element is also getting posted correctly.
Now the problem is
While doing the cost run system shows me Seperate cost for material as 100 , seperate for freight 10 & seperate for duty 5, but to the same cost element i.e. 355100. So all the cost is shown as material cost ; nothing is displayed as freight or duty
If I see the cost element report the corresponding value is flown to the corresponding cost element. But it is not reflecting in proper cost component in cost run
.Please guide me why this is happening. How can I resolve this
Regards,
Abhijit

Hi Ajay,
I was waiting for your reply.
As mentioned by you, I have mapped my cost component structure like Raw material, Freigh, Duty & assigned the corresponding cost elements to it.. But still in itemisation view it shows three values
consumption cost element 355100 - 100
consumption cost element 355100 - 10 (which should go to freight component where I have assigned the Freight cost element)
consumption cost element 355100 -5 (which should go to Duty component where I have assigned the Duty cost element)
FI entries are getting posted correctly. Values are flown to coresponding cost elements.
For the time being We will keep duty part side. We are discussing with client on this.
But, what could be the reason of this problem. How I can achieve the below mentioned result.
Cost component view
Raw material -100
Freight - 10
Duty - 5

Subsequent Delivery Free ......Why Freight calculated Twice

While doing Order SDF taking refrence of previous order I have come across this unique problem It makes sence that price is not determined but what is the logic of calculating Freight Twice using KF00 . I see that in pricing procedure RVCA01 (procedure for subsequent delivery free of charge with Freight ) . Gurus throw some light here. Why freight is being calculated Twice
Thanks

Good thinking but Freight condition is not maintained in supplement
I have already told that the condition type for freight is maintained TWICE .in pricing procedure for Subsequent Delivery Free RVCA01 ...Any special reason ?
Can any gurus know why freight condition is maintained twice ie Freight Twice using KF00 ?
What should be the reason?
or is it by mistake KF00 condition was maintained twice?
Edited by: arnoldsw sw on Mar 23, 2008 1:29 PM

SD Freight Calculation

Hi experts!
We are already LIVE with our project and we're having issues with PROFORMA!
One of the requirements is to CALCULATE the freight and print it in the form...
The problem here is our functional people are too busy with other stuff and don't have time to help us with definitions!
Can anyone help me define HOW to calculate the freight?
We have checked the table KONV and identified the Condition Types for freights but it doesnt seem to make sense for us!
Anyone???
We have identified the types of conditions, separeted them by Header condition and Item conditions... also the ones that are Net Weight, Quantity, FIxed Amount, etc... but we can't seem to figure out HOW to get to the actual freight value based on this info!
Pleeeeeeeeeease HELP!
Thanks in advance!
Fernanda
Moderator message: not directly related to ABAP development, please have a look in the ERP SD forums, also search for available information first.
Edited by: Thomas Zloch on Feb 8, 2012

Hi Nunes,
Based upon the Header Conditions - Automatic pricing does not take header conditions into account; you can not create condition records for them in the standard system.
Header conditions are entered manually in order processing. R/3 includes the following header conditions:
- Percent discount (HA00)
- Absolute discount (HB00)
- Freight (HD00)
- Order value (HM00)
Header Condition: If this condition is marked as a header condition, it is possible to enter the condition type in the header condition screen. Checks for changing the condition manually are unaffected by this.
Group Condition: Group conditions are helpfull incase of discounts. If group condition is selected then the discount percentage or quantity is applicable for the total sum of the quantity in the PO for those materials belonging to the same material group. Suppose if two materials of same matl grp have discounts for 100 qty and above but in PO if the two matls are bieng procured for 50 qty then they cant avail discounts but if group condition is selected then the sum of the quantity of both matl of same matl group is considered (50 + 50) and discount can be availed for 100 qty.
Further Group condition: Indicates whether the system calculates the basis for the scale value from more than one item in the document.
The nature of header condition is that whatever value you are giving in sale order / billing, line item wise, it will be distributed proportionately.
If you access V/06 and the header condition type, you can see that the condition type
- does not have any access sequence
- field Group condition is selected
Normally Freight Header condition like condition type "HD00" is calculated on the basis of weight. This is a Manual condition and you have to enter it in the header screen. It will be proportionately distributed on each item on the basis of weight. If you will uncheck the group condition field, the same freight amount will be copied to each item, possibly irrespective of different weight which may not be logical.
That is the standard behaviour of the header condition type.
Based on whether the group condition field is ticked on or off, it will either split the header condition value to the items on pro-rata basis or it will just duplicate the header value to all the items.
What you are experiencing with Fixed Amount Header conditions is standard behaviour. Please see below Notes:
- 876617 FAQ: Header conditions / Header condition screen
- 317112 Behavior of conditions w/ calculation rule B changed
- 485740 Conditions with fixed amount in copy activities
To achieve what you wish (absolute amount), solution is in the below Notes:
- 84605 Transfer absolute amount condition to billing doc.
- 25020 Value changes during over/underdelivery
- 25144 Freight conditions during milestone billing
Cheers
NZAB

TAXINJ MIRO PROBLEM

dear all
i am using TAXINJ procedure, now in MIRO the tax amount is calculating wrong, can any one help me.
i.e for the first line item it is ok when we are posting the second line or so on item the tax amount is calculating wrong,but in the MIGO the excise amount is calculting the correct and posting also ok
any note i have to apply to solve this problem, is yes pl give me the note number
regards
Jayareddy.p

hi
go to miro
her give po no
then let the system to calculate the values
go to tax tab in header level and check which tax code system is using
then for that tax code check FTXP and also the condition records in MEK1
regards
kunal

MIRO PROBLEM IN FREIGHT CALCULATION

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for