MM automatic account assignment for MIGO (additional accounting lines)

Hi MM Experts!
I created a PO (only 1 material in it), and after that I did a GR goods receipt in MIGO for this.
Movement type: 101
When I did this the accounting lines looks like that:
Itm PK Account    Account short text   Assignment...........................Amount
                                                                                1 89 21411000   Vás. villamosenergia      XXXX...........................................3.000.000
  2 96 29700000   Tech.acct.purch.stoc 450000012800010...................3.000.000-
I run the transaction OMWB, and did a simulation, and it ok:
Inventory posting                   0002  -e-       SEVV  89 21411000    99 21411000 
GR/IR clearing account          0002            SEVV  86 29700000    96 29700000 
So the MIGO 101 movement type for GR goods receipt did a BSX (Stock posting) and a WRX (GR/IR clearing) accounting.
I need the following:
If I do a MIGO with 101 movement (GR goods receipt), not just this 2 accounting line created, but I need +4 additional line (these lines are special taxes).
So if I do a MIGO I have to see:
1 89 21411000   Vás. villamosenergia      XXXX...........................3.000.000
2 96 29700000   Tech.acct.purch.stoc  450000012800010 ..3.000.000-
3 89 53471000   T.........................................................................1.500.000
4 96 46382100   K1......................................................................1.500.000-
5 89 51420000   T2.........................................................................750.000
6 96 47999421   K2.........................................................................750.000-
Is it possible? How can I do it?
I search in OBYC, but I canu2019t find appropriate solution.
Thanks for the answers.
Peter

Hi,
In 1st case, you have entry in Goods Receipt of inventory value debited(3.000.000 +) and GR/IR clearing(3.000.000 -). As all value flow from purchase order which with NET VALUE with pricing elements( condition type/types).
As in 2nd case you wanted.....with addition of above accounting entries, extra 4 lines needed but what are the two amounts represents ( 1.500.000 &   750.000)?
If so needed you should have two extra condition types in PO for amount representing 1.500.000 &   750.000.The condition types must be there in MM pricing procedure in M/08, maintain the  account keys  with a accrual key for each condition type. For condition types for both in M/06 , maintain condition category is must( do not keep blank, keep as B)& also select accrual check box in control data.In OBYC, maintain the  two different G/L accounts for two  accrual keys.
Also activate the Purchase account management in the Company code in following path:
SPRO> Materials Management> Valuation and Account Assignment> Account Determination> Account Determination Without Wizard> Purchase Account Management> Activate Purchase Account in Company Code
After above setting, Create a PO and do goods receipt and check accounting entries.
Regards,
Biju K

Similar Messages

  • Multiple account assignment for asset

    Hi,
    I had created PO with multiple account assignment for asset. PO is created with one line item having 5 qty and in multiple account assignment 5 assets are entered with qty distribution.
    I have issue with commitment distribution for all the account assignment. when i post migo(GR) the value is posting for only first one asset not for all.
    So in the purchase order for the remaining account assignment commitment remain left.
    Reagrds,
    Umesh
    Edited by: Umesh Agrawal on May 15, 2009 6:43 AM

    Hi,
    1st check in OME9 t.code for account assignment A, the selection of 2(Multiple account ***)in field ID: AcctAssgt Scrn and Distribution field as 1.
    Then during PO creation for single line item  & in Item details TAB, in account assignment segment, you enter qty with asset number (A1) with G/L account for 1st Line and for 2nd line keep  qty. with asset number(A1) with  G/L account ( different G/L Account) OR enter  qty with asset number (A1) with G/L account for 1st Line and for 2nd line keep  qty. with another asset number(A2) with  G/L account (different G/L Account)
    ####Example-1: in account assignment segment     , if you have
    G/L account----
    Asset
    12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A1
    12346u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A2
    12347u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A3
    12348u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A4
    Having a concept that GR is non-valuated and accounting entries in invoice (without tax) are:
    Vendor A/C: Cr
    G/L account (12345): Dr
    G/L account (12346): Dr
    G/L account (12347): Dr
    G/L account (12348 ):Dr
    #####Example-2: in account assignment segment     , if you have
    G/L account----
    Asset
    12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A1
    12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A2
    12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A3
    12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A4
    Having a concept that GR is non-valuated and accounting entries in invoice (without tax) are:
    Vendor A/C: Cr
    G/L account (12345): Dr
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Default account assignment for Rate difference for sales a/c

    When we try to clear the vendor through F110 we are facing error. Document posted with SDRU currency. It is expiry currency. It need to clear through USD . Vendor contain customer in the master data. But we are unable post in System No 1
    Another system we are able to post. It is automatically taking GL accounts for rate difference accounts for sales and purchase accounts.
    Here the entry is like below
    001 18      vendor                           139,99                
    002 25      Customer                   488,98       
    003 50      Bank                340,98                
    004 40      Rate difference for sales a/c           4,69                   
    005 50      Rate difference for purchases         12,70
    We want to compare both systems to find out the reason why it is not posing in one system
    Rate difference for purchases account assigned to OBYC-KDM
    But we are unable to find the Gl account Rate difference for sales a/c where it is assigned.
    We have seen OBKP, VKOA, OBA1 . Please let us know where this Rate difference for sales a/c may be assigned
    Please let us know Default account assignment for Rate difference for sales a/c

    Hi,
        Regarding the rate differences. These accounts come from OB09 where it is defined for the Reconcilliation account in the customer/ Vendor.
    The account "Rate difference for purchases" is coming from OB09 , it is not from OBYC-KDB in this case.
    Kind regards

  • Automatic posting configuration for GR/IR account

    Dear Alll,
    I need some clarification on Automatic posting configuration for GR/IR account. In OBYP, for transaction BNG-Invoiced but not yet delivered we maintain GR/IR clearing account, adjustment account and target account. As per my understanding, adjustment accounts and target accounts are only hit during closing time when GR/IR account has some value and that time it is checked using the transaction F.19 and the amount is posted to adjustment account and target account. Please point out where I'm wrong and provide explanation if I'm loosing on some point
    Warm Regards
    Mazdul

    Hi Jud
    You should make these posting to a cost center then..The only way you can control account postings via PO type is having a account assignement category. You can make this as mandatory filed for this PO type..
    Please let me know if your requirement is different..
    CHeers
    R K Bolla

  • BAPI_PO_CHANGE "No account assignment for service 0000010" SE 518 Error

    Hi  Friends,
    I am using BAPI_PO_CHANGE to add new line item with service data to purchase order.
    For one scenario BAPI give me above error is "No account assignment for service 0000010" SE 518 .
    basically when i pass outline aggrement and contract item to bapi i am getting this error.....according to my observation in outline agrement account assignment is maintain as 'U' but i want to pass outline agrement as 'K' or 'N' so i am passing this into BAPI parameters ,however i feel somewhere it is getting conflict  so it giving above error...
    Please guide,
    Thanks & Regards,
    Bhaskar

    Hi Seini,
    Thanks for reply ..
    I have pass contract number to BAPI ....and i also pass cost center and GL account to account assignment but still bapi giving same error.....I am totally stuck into this i tried a lot with different options..for other scenario BAPI works fine but when I pass contract number with account assignment 'U' and I want to change this 'U' to 'K' or 'N'  for this I pass account assignment to PO line item but BAPI fails in this perticular scenario.

  • Account assignment for Movt type 101 and 501

    All SAP Gurus,
    We want to do the account assignment for movt types 101, 102, 122, 123, 201, 202, 261, 262 accourding to the movement types.
    We are aware that the Transaction Key is 'GBB'.
    But how to know that which 'General Modification' is used for which movement types.
    (in short where we can find this link between movement types and Transaction Key and 'General Modification')
    Regards,

    To know this first you have to know what does the different general modifications means for GBB:
    AUA: for order settlement
    AUF: for goods receipts for orders (without account assignment)
    and for order settlement if AUA is not maintained
    AUI: Subsequent adjustment of actual price from cost center directly
    to material (with account assignment)
    BSA: for initial entry of stock balances
    INV: for expenditure/income from inventory differences
    VAX: for goods issues for sales orders without
    account assignment object (the account is not a cost element)
    VAY: for goods issues for sales orders with
    account assignment object (account is a cost element)
    VBO: for consumption from stock of material provided to vendor
    VBR: for internal goods issues (for example, for cost center)
    VKA: for sales order account assignment
    (for example, for individual purchase order)
    VKP: for project account assignment (for example, for individual PO)
    VNG: for scrapping/destruction
    VQP: for sample withdrawals without account assignment
    VQY: for sample withdrawals with account assignment
    ZOB: for goods receipts without purchase orders (mvt type 501)
    ZOF: for goods receipts without production orders
    (mvt types 521 and 531)
    You can also define your own account groupings. If you intend to post goods issues for cost centers (mvt type 201) and goods issues for orders (mvt type 261) to separate consumption accounts, you can assign the account grouping ZZZ to movement type 201 and account grouping YYY to movement type 261
    Then go and check OMWN.
    Regards,
    Indranil

  • Location and account assignment for technical objeCT

    WHAT IS Location and account assignment for technical objeCT , FOR functional location

    Hi
    check the one of the Views for the above data (notification no + fun Location)
    VIQMAML_IFLOS   
    VIQMELST_IFLOS  
    VIQMEL_IFLOS    
    VIQMFEL_IFLOS   
    VIQMSML_IFLOS   
    Regards
    Anji

  • Multiple account assignement for PO

    Hi!
    i've this problem about purchase data: to extract these data i'm using 2lis_02_itm and 2lis_02_Scl DS.
    but i need in the same query the account assignement for PO (these data are in EKKN table).
    in a first time i've enhanced the DS, but with Multiple account assignement i don't have correct data (because i've used select single in CMOD).
    now i don't know how to enhance the DS with Multiple account assignement, could you help me ?
    (a solution is doing an ODS with EKKN data and make an infoset with an other ODS with data from LIS extractor, but i prefer to enhance the DS)

    Hi Alex
    You are not able to enhance 2lis_02* datasources to give you the information wanted. The problem is that you need to split one line into multiple lines. I'm as well not sure that you'll get a good result from an infoset as you’ll get performance problems due to the needed join on document , line level and a possible outer join (not all documents will show up in EKKN). A better solution will be to source EKKN to a separate ODS, source 2lis_02* into separate ODS’s and then create a new ODS sourcing data from the 2lis_02* ODS where you read the EKKN ODS in the start routine and uses that info to create extra rows if needed.
    With Kind Regards
    Kristian

  • GL Account assigned for a Material

    Dear All,
    Please let me know how can we find the GL Account assigned for a Material.
    I am having some 10 number of materials. I need to find the GL Account which is assigned for the materials.
    Regards,
    Karthik
    Edited by: Kartyic on Dec 19, 2011 5:27 AM

    Hi,
    G/L Account assigned to a material is nothing but the G/L provided to the valuation class which is assigned to the material in Accounting- view of the material master -MM01.And this assignment of G/L to the valuation class is made in tcode OBYC.
    All the same  kind of material types contain same valuation class.
    Thanks
    Edited by: Madhavi.n on Dec 19, 2011 10:00 AM

  • Change in account assignment for Limit Order SRM not replicated to backend

    User has made in SRM (5.0 Ext Classic scenario) a limit shopping cart with Invoice and Confirmation and Acc. assigment 'Known' . This resulted in a PO with has been replicated to backend . In MM PO with Imtem category 'D' has been created.
    The user know reports that he has made wrong account assignment and asks for change so that the new cost assigment appears in his Confirmations as proposal.
    Normally I am able to do this through Tx 'process purchase order' (BBP_POC) in SRM and it is properly replicated to backend - meaning PO in MM is updated with new cost assigment
    However for this limit order the changes I have made in BBP_POC seems not to be replicated into backend and hence on goods receipt it still shows the old assigment.
    Anyone an idea of cause for this?
    Thanks in advance for any reply or help

    Hello,
    1) Are you seeing any errors in rz20.
    2) You may consider transferring the PO again to the backed using the function module BBP_PD_PO_TRANSFER_EXEC.
    3) If you see any account assignment errors , check the account assignment in SRM and ERP PO are the same or as mapped in the table BBP_C_ACC
    Regards,
    Pavan

  • Account assignment for group asset is different from that in asset

    Dear experts,
    I have creted one main asset . and i have created group asset. and my main asset class and group asset class are both are different.If i continue that error assets are shoud be craeted .but the depreciation key and usefull life and ordinary depreciation will going and it's showing grey.
    My question at the time of assighning the group asset for the particular assets the below error is comming.
    Account assignment for group asset is different from that in asset
    Message no. AA810
    Diagnosis
    The account allocation 14000 of the group asset 140000001 0 is different from account allocation 1000 of the asset.
    System Response
    This error needs to be corrected for balance sheet valuation (usually determined in depreciation area 01). For all other depreciation areas, this is only a warning you should check.
    Procedure
    Check your entry. When an individual asset has a different account assignment than the group asset, it is not possible to reconcile the individual asset to the group asset in reporting by means of accounts.
    kindly help on this issue
    regards
    venkataswamy

    Hi sudhakar
    Thanks for your reply
    1) for example i have buliding asset class and i have one group asset class.under the building asset account determination i have assighned the gl a/c for both b/s and book deprecitaion
    In groups asset class also i have done same things. i have craeted asset under building asset class and created one asset under group assets.
    then assighned the group asset to main assets. the error is comming like this Account assignment for group asset is different from that in asset
    I have serched in sdn forum and service .sap.com . they are saying you can use same gl a/c for both asset class.for depreciation .i have tried this scenario. still i am getting the same error and same problem.
    The most important thing is we are working on ECC 6 versions
    sap note 76186.
    Kindly help me
    Regards
    venkataswamy
    Edited by: venkataswamy bathini on Jul 6, 2009 9:22 AM

  • Error in account assignment for item

    Hello,
    We have configured EBP at Stack 03 in SRM release 550
    We are facing problem to create shopping cart,
    Already it was working fine but now at the time of adding item to shopping cart it shows below error
    messages
    1.Version 0 is not defined for fiscal year 2007
    2.Error in account assignment for item
    For your reference error screen is given in attached document.
    pls advise
    Regards,
    Santosh

    Hi Christophe,
    I am getting the same error <b>'Version 0 is not defined for fiscal year 2007'</b> when tried to create a Sales Order in IDES system and I am trying the solution to add the fiscal year 2007 in T.code OKEV but it fails.
    The steps what I have done :
    1. Go to OKEV
    2. Selecting control area 1000
    3. Selecting the version 0 line
    4. then trying to open the Settings for Each fiscal year from Dialog Structure
    The error i get is :
    <b>E: Activation of the indicator is not permitted</b>
    and the highlighted line in red is for Version 1
    The default indicator is set for version 1 is Plan, WIP/RA, Variance & Legal Valuation (Valuation view)
    I tried in many ways to 'uncheck' the boxes for this version 1 but fails.
    Pls help.
    regds,
    Umesh

  • Mandatory default account assignment for HIBE material

    Hi,
    For stock transfer PO we need account assignment Mandatory with default value "K" while creating the stock transfer PO.
    How we can do this?
    With Best Regards,
    Rajkumar

    Thanks for the reply.
    We want the same functionality as described by you.
    The requirement is that, when the stock transfer PO will be created the account assignment for line item of HIBE type (only) should be displayed as "K" i.e. Acct. assig. is mandatory and default equal to "K". With this restriction the user creating the Stock transfer PO for HIBE material will be prompted to enter cost center and GL account. And when goods receipt will be made for the PO,  the HIBE material will get consumed for cost center.
    So, can we made such restrictions while creating stock transfer PO?
    With Best Regards,
    Rajkumar N. Phand

  • Revenue account assignment for co object

    Dear All,
    Hi, I am posting customer invoice(FB70). At the time of posting i am getting the below error:
    Account assignment for co object.
    I already assigned the profit center in okb9. cost center is not assigned in okb9. because there is no direct co assignment for revenue cost element. is it right? if any wrong please correct me.
    Where i can assign the profitability segment in revenue gl account.please tel me assignment steps and t.code of that assignment.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Reddy

    where we can update the profitabilitry segment, any t.code is there.i tried to posting i am getting the error:
    Account 31111100 requires an assignment to a CO object
    Message no. KI235
    Diagnosis
    You have not defined a CO account assignment for an account that is relevant to cost accounting.
    System Response
    Account 31111100 is defined as a cost element.
    This means that you must always specify a CO account assignment.
    Procedure
    Enter one of the following CO account assignments
    Order
    Cost center / cost center/ activity type
    Sales order item (for a project or cost relevant)
    Project / WBS element
    Cost object (Process manufacturing)
    Network/ Network activities
    Business process
    Profitability segment
    Real estate object
    The posting row affected is 001, account 31111100.
    How to avoid the error message,how to assign the real controlling object to revenue account .please tel me process steps.
    Thanks & Regards, Reddy

  • Multiple account assignment for distribution of freight cost in MIRO Transaction

    Hi MM Gurus
    I have created one Purchase order with multiple account assignment for Asset 'A' in which freight cost is added.
    I have done good receipt in which only material document is generated. (No financial document generated).
    While doing the MIRO for the same Purchase order I m not able to view delivery cost for the same.
    I  check this thing in SDN but no concrete solution ..
    My question is how to capture delivery cost in Multiple account assignment Purchase roder
    Regards
    Amit

    Hi,
    You have done goods receipt for Asset PO but no accounting document created. Now cross check in t.code:OME9 and find GR Non-Valuated check box selected which cause your concern on why your accounting document created for goods receipt for Asset PO!
    Check how delivery cost designed for your Asset Purchase, may be in your case - delivery cost added  to your asset purchase- which result, you could not find delivery cost in invoice posting!
    Regards,
    Biju K

Maybe you are looking for

  • BADI - WORKORDER_GOODSMVT - check for BATCH management

    Hi there, I have implemented WORKORDER_GOODSMVT BADI (Backflush method) to fill the batch number with a default value for a given plant. This is working fine. However, I only want to fill this if the Material in the Production Order is "batch managed

  • Forwarding Events

    Hello, I have implemented a JTree in with custom renderers. Each node is a complex widget. It has a label, a button and a table. Events are intercepted by the JTree, so if I click on the button nothing happens, and when I click on a table's cell I ca

  • Sessions, URL Rewriting, and Cookies

    First some background, then some questions:           BACKGROUND           I have written an application framework to use with JSP/EJB/Servlet           based applications. This framework does URL rewriting           (response.encodeUrl) for all URLs

  • My Files are not complete!

    i bought an audio book from my ipod and it only plays one hour of it. It shows the whole file time but is only silence?? Why?

  • WebLogic Workshop 9.2

    Though the base version of Eclipse being used for WebLogic Workshop 9.x is Eclipse 3.1, why has the feature.xml file of Eclipse been changed to say 9.2?