MM:Formulae Based Pricing,ED not calculating whilw MIRO

Hi !!!
I made a PO for Inventorised Excise duty & deductable VAT,
Now after posting GR,I found correct accounting entries
i.e.
24340000     Inv RM & BOP-Local     974,160.00
13110100     GRIR Ext Domestic     974,160.00-
But while posting Invoice for the same the duty & VAT is not captured & after simulation I found following Entries
K     13110000     SUNALCO ALLOYS PVT LTD / 421303 THANE----900,000.00-
S     13110100     GR/IR-clearing - ext procurement - Domestic-------974,160.00
M     24340000     ALUMINIUM ALSI -
74,160.00-
But Vendor acct should hit     974,160.00 + VAT 974,160.00
What config has to made for this....
Plz suggest,
Vinay

Hi,
Pls use correct tax code while doing MIRO. Before that pls check Part-II entry had been posted.
Regards,

Similar Messages

Tax not calculating in MIRO within a date range.

Hi Experts ,
We have created a tax code and assign its values in condition types under two separate Key Combination.
1) Tax Classification : 4% ( Non Validity) , in access sequence exclusive indicator is set aganst it.
2) Tax Code : 4% (Valdity - Sept - till 9999), Exclusive indicator is not set against it.
Issue is that when i create a PO ( at any date) system is picking up the taxes.
Nom at the time of MIRO , if i post the MIRO before sept. system is allowing me to do so and calculate taxes correctly.
But when i change the date to Sept the system does not calculate taxes.
Even though the Tax Classification has more priority in access sequence compared to tax code , i am failed to understand why system is not calculating taxes.
I have tried deleting conditions in tax code key combinations but still system is not calculating taxes in MIRO,
Pls guide.
Regards
Honey

Hi Ramesh ,
i have done the same . Maintained he condition record via FV11. but system is not calculating tax for sept. month in MIRO.
In PO tax calculation is perfect but in MIRO it is not calculating tax.( ticked calculate tax option also).

Tax not calculating in MIRO

Hi ,
I have created on PO in which system showing exicse and VAT amount.
But while doing MIRO it is not showing any tax and exice even though i selected calculate tax option.
Regards,
Ravindra

Hi,
See the material document whether Tax code assigned or not in MIGO
if assign that untill and unless taxcode not appear in MIRO to book the entry.
Hope if it useful assign points
Regards,
Sankar

Pricing: Customs % not calculating as desired

Hi All,
I have condition type Customs % which calculates from Net value+ freights. however when i make a PO the customs % calculates the value more.
I checked all steps in calculation schema and condition type and have gone according to best of my knowledge on pricing.
For Eg
NAVS-------100 USD            100 USD
FRB1----
100 USD            100 USD
CUS1----
1 %                 3,00 USD ( This should 2 USD)
Please advice.

if your customs % gives you 3 instead of 2, then i would check the value entered in the condition record.
SAP menu > MM > purchasing > master data > conditions .......

Excise Duty not calculated at MIRO

Hi
We have upgraded the patch level of SAP_APPL from 10 to 11. Now, in PO we have assigned a tax code for calculation of excise duty at 14.42%. In the tax details in PO Items, system is showing the calculation of excise duties correctly.When the excise invoice from vendor is posted through J1IEX . Here the system is passing the entries
BDE Dr
Cess Dr
SECESS Dr
       Cenvat Clearing A/c Cr
When we do MIRO, system is passing the following entries
GR/IR Dr
     Vendor A/c Cr
The correct entries to be passed shoudl be
GR/IR Dr
Cenvat Clearing Dr
         Vendor A/c Cr
When we were on patch 10 for SAP_APPL, system was passing the entries correctly. However, after the upgradation, system is not capturing the excise details. We have maintained all the related configuration in J1ID and also maintained the condition records in FV11.
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

Hi,
Check whether "GR based IV" is active for the PO line item under "Invoice" Tab. If not then active and check or do a complete new cycle with this indicator as active and check.
Also check that in MIRO, you are selecting the tax code of PO at Header level in "Basic Data" Tab also.

Tax not calculated in MIRO for the condition type JVCD

Hi,
We made some new different tax code and attached with JVCD , its calculating in PO but in MIRO calculation part not done but for other condition type ,JVRD,JVRN system calculating well...
Please tell me some way why not system calculating in case of JVCD and JVCN for capital case..
Thanks in Advance,
Dharmveer

Hi,
We totally agreed with you and already we checked our configuration part is OK.Actually we want to map some process where we captured excise in GR but no need to take credit i.e. to post the excise in J1IEX,so we do not have to post our cenvat/modvat entry in MIRO but we need to calculate VAT whether it is deductible or non deductible.So far this thing is concerned,we made separate tax code which we use at time of MIRO posting and in configuration we did not attached the tax code in logitics-basic excise -assign to company code. Because once we attached here , system asking to make to pass furst RG part2 entry then it allows to post MIRO entry which we do not want .So please understand this scenario is different and we got the success for JVRN/JVRD for VAT but getting issue in case of capital VAT where system does not calculate tax for JVCN/JVCD .....where we want to process MIRO without posting J1IEX..
Please thing and analyse ..give some helping response..
Thanks,
Dharmveer

Withholding tax not calculating in MIRO and calculating in F-43

Hi,
Whenever I am positng invoice thru F-43, Calculating withholding tax amount and generating seperate line item for that.
But for same vendor after posting MM cycle( PO - GR -MIRO) and I am posting Invoice thru MIRO WHT line item not generating while simulating and also after posting.
Checks done :
1. In vendor master data Liable check box is ticked and Tax codes are properly maintained.
2. Minimun and maximum amounts checked.
3.Base amounts checked.
4. Formula for WHT checked
5. I feel if these setting are not good,it should not post in F-43 also. But it is posting in F-43.
Kinldy tell me any specific setting for calculating the WHT thru transaction MIRO
Thanks in advance

Shankar,
Thanks for reply.
If I don't put amount in the basic data tab( MIRO) then it does not allow to "simulate" or "Post". But here I can simulate and Post
I check every thing in WHT Config but I could't found the solution.
I want to tell another thing, we recently went to patch upgrade from Version 4.7 E SP 22 to 4.7 E SP30.
My question, Is the pacth upgrade affects in anyway???
If any suitable answer appreciatable.
Thanks once again for your reply.

Taxes not calculated in MIRO

Hi,
We are using TAXINN procedure and we maintained all the relevent condition records for excise and VAT. The excise and VAT are getting properly calulated in PO and all the accounting entries in GR and J1IEX_P are correct.
However at the time of MIRO, evem after making a tick in the "Calculate taxes" check box, the taxes are not getting calulated. The tax code used is V0-zero tax.
Is any customising setting required ?
Thanks,
SR

Hello,
1. Create new tax code in FTXP.
2. Assign the tax code to company code (SPRO >> Logistic general >> Tax on goods movement >> India >> Basic settings >> Determination of excise duty >> Condition based excise determination >> Assign tax code to company codes
3. In access sequence JTAX include table 003-Tax Classification at the top before Plant/Vendor/Material - 363
4.Now matain the condition record for new tax code in fv11 for plant material and vendor combination for your condtion types like JMOP, JVRD etc also matain the set-off condition type also.
Regards,
Shailesh

Tax And pricing not calculating automatically on Purchase Order

Hi All,
While creating a Purchase order the Taxes are not calculating automatically .We need to manually enter the Tax on the Purchase order .The quantity conversion is not flowing properly so it is effecting the invoice receipt (not distributing the tax on the invoice.Can any one please tell me the problem or the configuration to check this issue .
Thanks in Advance

Hi
Please check all these below setting.
1) Which tax procedure using.
If TAXINJ - Then check tax code using FTXP for valid tax code which you are using in PO.
2) If TAXINN then check FV13 - for key combination such as Vendor /Material/Plant or Tax classification or Tax code/Vendor.
depending upon your are using.
3) Check Tax code is assigned to co code in Logistics - General-Tax on Goods Movements-India Condition-Based Excise Determination-Assign Tax Code to Company Codes
4) Check J1ID for material & Chapter ID, Vendor Excise details, Excise determination.
Once all this is ok then tax value will flow in to PO.
Regards
Sudhir

Bapi_acc_document post is not calculating baseline date based pymnt terms

Hello friends,
Im using bapi_acc_document_post to post db and cr note and i m passing payment terms in the input file but the bapi is not calculating baseline date .
pleasee let me knw the solution.
Regards,
Sunny

that's the disadvantage of bapis and direct input in opposite to BDC. So use "old" rfbibl00 with batch input!
A.

Header level pricing is not triggered

Hi
I am facing problem when I change some line item data on my sales transaction then header level pricing is not triggered though system triggers line item pricing and all the line item condition types are calculated but header condition types are not calculated.
Would you please let me know how can I trigger my header level pricing.
Regards
Javed

Hi Javed,
As I understood your problem, the item level condition types are calculated and condition records are fetched while the header level conditions are not calculated. This is a strange thing because the pricing procedure associated with the document will have condition types marked relevant for header and item level. Depending on these and the formulae associated with the condition types in the pricing procedure, IPC calculates the condition values and are summed up as different items at the header level.
I would suggest you to to switch on the debugging parameter for your user id and try to debug to check condition types failing at the header level.
Regards,
Pavithra
**PS : Please reward points if you find this useful.

Custom Pricing Conditions not working for a PO in SRM

Hi Experts,
We are on SRM 5.0, ECC 6.0 , Extended Classic Scenario.
We configured the pricing conditions in SRM . We defined the our custom pricing condition types as below
Condition type      --- Condition Class       --- Calculation Type
Frieght(%)            ---       Prices                ---      Percentage
Frieght Value       ---        Prices                --- Fixed Amount
We also defined the Calculation Schema.
But when we try to define the pricing conditions in SRM during PO creation\change , the standard pricing condition types work but when we input the above defined custom pricing condition type, the value entered gets cleared. Pricing Overview is not calculating the values of the custom Pricing condition types.
Please assist as where i have gone wrong. Do I need to run any standard report for pricing or do i have to implement any BADI.
Thanks,
Addy.

Hi Sanjeev,
I have run SM52 and VMC is active with 4 VM's .
Please suggest.
Thanks,
Addy.
Edited by: Addy1209 on Nov 18, 2010 4:28 PM

F110-Withholding Tax Not Calculating

Dear Gurus,
For ceratin vendors in F110 system is not paying and in payment run log a msg is generated as--Internal Error:Doc Balance not zero.In one vendor there are 2 open items system is calculating WHT for one invoice correctly and showing in payment log for ther other other than posting its its showing at as a difference and sysing that doc balance is not zero.
But when I simulated the 2 invoices separately in F-53 correct WHt is shown but unable to understand why Payment Prog is not calculating for one of the documents.
My client is based out of Thailand both docs have same WHT code and and WHT Type that is at payment.Please help.
Regards
Prabin

You are saying that the invoice which are created with tax codes creates problem when it is paid through F110 that too for certain vendors, right ? Still I am asking, at the time of invoice booking (F-43), the document will have line items with payable amount, tax deductions, etc. right ? This payable amount only will be selected in F110 run. Why then you want to calculate TDS again in F110 ? With regard to your query that it is happening for certain vendors, please check the proper tax codes have been incorporated in the masters and the liable bock check is ticked.

Invoice corrections Sales order- New Pricing is not carried out

Hi All,
waiting for some one to guide me in a right way...
I have Scenario where creating a invoice correction request with reference to Invoice document.New pricing is not carried in debit line item even though i changed the pricing date as current date for the line item
When i copied with the invoice document, 2 new line items are created with a same price conditions.
1st line item is a credit and 2nd line item is a debit item.
I need to do a price adjustment in debit line. So i maintained a new pricing record for the material to carry out the price.
To achieve this in customizing VTAF (billing to sales) I have tried multiple options as below in 2nd pricing type field as B,C,D,E and F
2nd Pricing type - B Carry out new pricing
C     Copy manual pricing elements and redetermine the others
D     Copy pricing elements unchanged
E     Adopt price components and fix values
F     Copy pricing elements, turn value and fix
But still the new pricing is not carried out.I tried to manually change the Pricing date in the line item level, still the new price is not updated in the order.
I have seen SAP Help in below link the Debit line can update with correct price point 3 in proces flow , check this below link for reference.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/dd/55feeb545a11d1a7020000e829fd11/content.htm.
Please help...
Regards,
Parthiban

Hello Parthiban,
I feel you are aware of the effect/functionality of 2nd pricing type.
In the invoice correction request, two items are automatically created for each item in the invoice to be copied (which you did mention):
- first item:   credit memo item
- second item: debit memo item
And for invoice correction request, a particular pricing type is needed for the second item.
So as per standard, you have to use pricing type 'E' for the credit memo item to guarantee that the item will not be changed.
And you should give a new pricing type to the debit memo item.
The system creates a credit or debit memo depending on whether a postive or negative difference is generated.
So that means
Pricing type will effect ItemCat Proposal-G2N
and 2nd pricing type will effect 2ndItemCatProposal-L2N
Now, make changes in pricing type based on your business requirement.
I hope this will assist you in understanding.
Thanks & Regards
JP

Octroi is not calculating on Freight value

Hello,
We are maintained all the conditions in PO conditions tab. Inclucding of Frieght conditions.
here Octroi is not calculating on Freight value.
If suppose the frieght vendor is different then it is ok to calculted Octri without frieght,
If suppose the Frieght vendor is same as Main vendor then Octri should calculte on including of fright value.
Regards
Mahesh Naik

Hello,
In pricing schema We have given the 361 as ALT CBV to octroi condition (JOCM), to calculate the octroi percentage on Octroi Base value that is basic Price excise dutysales tax.
As per requirement 361, system should fetch the octroi base value from taxation procedure to pricing schema
Regards
Mahesh Naik.

MM:Formulae Based Pricing,ED not calculating whilw MIRO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for