Modification of BP in ERP.

We have both a CRM and ERP system that uses Middleware for replication of BP data from CRM to ERP.
However, on the ERP side I would like to modify the org.data for the BP after replication (on the ERP side).
Is there a BAPI or FM that I can use to read the records from CRM and modify it ?
Thanks.

Hi,
Try to find in se37 for BUPA* there are a lot of bapis that can help you
Best regards,
Caíque Escaler

Similar Messages

Best approach for syndication in Central MDM

MDM 7.1
CE 7.2
ERP 6 EHP4
PI 7.1 EHP1
We are currently developing a custom application using CE/BPM workflow for central maintenance of customer master data. One of the topics under discussion is the right approach for syndication once a record is complete.
[This |http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/60a3118e-3c3e-2d10-d899-ddd0b963beba?quicklink=downloads&overridelayout=true] SAP document on collaborative material master data creation provides one way to achieve this syndication by first calling a web service from BPM to create record in ERP before checking in MDM. While I am personally fine with the approach, some of the other colleagues aren't too keen on issuing synchronous calls from BPM. Rather, they would like to use the syndication engine of MDM to transmit data to downstream systems (currently only SAP ERP) using Idocs. But there is a caveat here. To use syndication, the record has to be checked in.
The problem is that if the record is checked in MDM, it is ready for modification. However, the asynchronous call to ERP using Idocs for creation of customer master might fail for any number of reasons. In this case, the MDM record might need a modification before resubmitting to ERP. In the meantime, since the record was checked in before syndication, someone else might have checked it out, potentially resulting in data quality issues. So to avoid this situation, the developer has decided to take the approach to check in -> syndicate -> check out -> wait for confirmation Idoc -> check in if success. This isn't a clean approach to syndicate but might address the record locking issue.
Another consideration is to design the application with the view that sometime in the future, this master data might have to be syndicated to other SAP and non-SAP systems as well. To ensure syndication to all downstream systems is complete before checking in MDM can be a tricky requirement and might need some complex ccBPM development or evaluating something similar to two-phase commit (might be an overkill). In any case, a best practice approach for keeping downstreams systems in sync with MDM in case of central MDM has to be shared by SAP. So it would be good to have comments of the people who developed the reference application for collaborative material master data creation.
If there are any customers who have come up with a custom solution which works, please do share the experience.
Thanks and regards,
Shehryar

Thanks Ravi. While there are more than one possible solutions to the immediated problem, I am actually looking for a design pattern which SAP recommends or a customer has developed to address the issues related to synchronization of master data in a Central MDM environment.
The idea behind a central master data management function, as you know, is that all participating business systems use the same basic master data being authored in MDM. This data has to be synchronized with all participating systems, rather than just one system. To me, a ccBPM workflow or 2 phase commit design pattern seem to be the solution. But it would be good to know how other customers are addressing the issue of master data synchronization with multiple systems, or SAP's recommendations for this issue.
Regards,
Shehryar

Special stock partner data problem in ERP system during "Post Goods issue"

Hi all,
I have a (probably) customizing issue in an ERP 6.0 EhP4 test system which not occurs in the ERP 6.0 test system. There is a difference but no one could tell me, what causes the problem in this scenario:
I have two customers, C1 and C2. C2 is the special stock partner (SB) of C1.
I've created a Consignment Fill-up order, then a delivery document based on the order and posted it with "Post Goods Issue". During the update process, a function module (SD_PARTNER_UPDATE) receives partner data in an internal table which contains the sold-to, ship-to and special partner data.
When we tried the same process in the ERP 6.0 EhP4 test system then special-partner data did not occur in the parameter table (I've used the same customers and materials). The special stock partner is probably not taken into consideration due to some customizing settings.
My question is what should I change in the customization to run the process the same way as in the ERP 6.0 system? As far as I know there are no new modifications which have effect on this area, and the used test customers and materials are almost the same - there are no noticable differences.
Thanks in advance.
Akos

I tried setting that field in the sale order this morning. By defaulting it to "C"; I was able to get warning message for TAE line. I was able to post goods with TAE and TAQ, being different quantities. I need the check to determine if TAE and TAQ delivery quantity are different. Using this fields seems to be line specific. Thanks for the suggestion. I now know what that field does to the delivery.
I rewarded points.
Thanks,
Tony

How to replicate a customer from ERP to a Person in CRM

Hi,
I am doing an implementation of CRM 7.0 and have to integrate it with an existing ERP (ECC6) system. I've set up the replication of the Business Partners to replicate two of the Account Groups in ERP to CRM and it is working well. The only problem is that the customers in the ERP system are Organizations and Persons. When the replication takes place, all are created as Organizations (role sold-to Party).
Is there a way to replicate customer data from ERP and have the BP in CRM created with BP Category 1 (Person) in stead of 2 (Organization)?
The customers in the ERP system are not consumers.
Thanks
Jeanine

I logged an OSS for this problem and SAP replied with the following:
"What you've explained is a standard behavior of the system.
Since CRM and R/3 have different BP data models, all BPs from R/3 are
transferred to CRM be default as Organizations.
An only exception is BPs, which are assigned into account group, which
is mapped into classification "Consumer: persons".
Customers downloaded to CRM will always be interpreted as Business
Partners of the type organisation.
Customers in R/3 are Organisations and are subsequently replicated to
the CRM system of the BP Type - Organisation, therefore the standard
scenario is that customers downloaded from R/3 are replicated as
Business Partners of type Organisation.
If you don't want to use functionality of Consumers, it's also
possible to change the category with a modification by
appending the R/3 outbound processing or the CRM Inbound processing
this would change the organisations to persons, and is possible by
changing the category in the complex structure from 2 to 1 by copying
the organisational data to the personal data, the category change
works only before the creation of Business Partners in CRM, for
existing BPs that have been downloaded, it would be necessary to
delete these BPs using Note 415007 and start the download again after
modifying the User-Exits.
The data sent from R/3 are mapped into a complex structure of type
BUS_EI_MAIN. In CRM table CRMC_BUT_CALL_FU you can add an own
function module for event "CRM INBOUND" and a position less than
100000. Here you can you can change the field
C_BP_STRUCT-CENTRAL_DATA-COMMON-DATA-BP_CONTROL-CATEGORY from 2 to 1
depending on other data that is available in this structure.
Additionally you have to map the organisation specific data
C_BP_STRUCT-CENTRAL_DATA-COMMON-DATA-BP_ORGANIZATION into the
person specific data
C_BP_STRUCT-CENTRAL_DATA-COMMON-DATA-BP_PERSON and initialize the
organizational data. Be sure to check the category before doing this,
because the initial download sometimes forces partial processing
in case of errors and tries to reprocess the BPs that don't have errors
So your mapping from organizational data to personal data should be
done only once.
This solution only works if the criteria is available in the structure
BUS_EI_EXTERN. If it is not, you can add an User Exit in R/3 in the
R/3 outbound processing at event DE_BCS2S in the tables TBE24
(definition of product) and TBE34 (definition of your module).
Unfortunately the data are only available as BAPIMTCS structures
and you have to look for a structure
with BAPIMTCS-TABNAME = 'BSC_MAINCE' to change the category.
See module PI_BP_MAIN_TO_BAPIMTCS in order to understand this mapping."
We will do the cutomization and test, but I think this is the only solution.
Regards
Jeanine

Vendor replication: Delta modification : Report BBP_VENDOR_SYNC : SLG1

Hello,
I am trying to update delta modification of replicated vendors vendor from R/3 to SRM via BBPGETVD. When we go to SLG1, there is an error stating "PSR : Function module BBP_REMOTE_CLNT_CHECK is not available" where PSR is system name. I have verified and there are no modifications updated.
We are in SRM_SERVER5.5 with SP06. What could be the problem ?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Rahul Mandale

Hi Rahul,
In Customizing for vendor synchronization, you define between which mySAP or ERP backend systems and the EBP System you wish to automatically synchronize the vendor master data. This setting is necessary in order to start a job-based execution of the synchronization, so that the vendor master data that is newly created or changed in the backend is updated regularly in the EBPSystem.
Customizing for Vendor Synchronization consists of two parts. In the first part you make those settings that are valid for all backend systems. In the activity Make Settings for Each Backend System you can define or display detail data for the individual backend systems.
regards,nishant
please reward if this helps

Purchase Order Modification: External Document Number already assigned

Hello,
We're running Extended Classic Scenario in a SRM 4.0 implementation.
The problem is the following: When the user modifies a purchase order (this purchase order is already replicated to the backend), sometimes (not always), the next error occurs:
"Purchase Order XXXXXXXXXX: PO header data still faulty "
"Purchase Order XXXXXXXXXX: External document number XXXXXXXXX already assigned"
The system does not provide additional info (RZ20 give us the same message, no ST22 dumps...
We think it could be some kind of error in the standard BAPI BAPI_PO_CHANGE.
We've revised the SAP OSS but didn´t find anything....
Some idea?
Regards and Thanks in advance!!!

Hi
Any other rrors / dumps noticved in system using RZ20 and ST22 transactions ?
Have you seen this helpful pointers and link ?
The related SAP OSS notes are as under :
"Purchase Order item 00010 still contains faulty account assignment items"
Note 1000184 - Account assignment error when document transfer to back end
Note 966323 - Service Item: Not able to create PO in ERP backend
"Purchase Order item 00010 still contains faulty account assignment items"
Re: How to create a PO in R/3 from a local Bid Invitation in classic scenario ?
Re: From local Bid invitation PO is not generated in backend
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

Modification of Web Dynpro ABAP ESS application

Hi,
I'm familiar with the modification process of ESS Web Dynpro Java applications using NWDI. However I have to adda button a view in the "Create Expense Report" iView which is a Web Dynpro ABAP application from ERP 6 Ehp3. On the click of this button a pdf report should be shown. The Web Dynpro ABAP application is FITE_EXPENSES.
Can anyone tell me what is the process for modifying ESS WD ABAP code? Do I copy and create a new application and then modify?
I'm not getting any documentation on this on SDN or SAP Help.
Regards

hi,
->You dont have to copy and create new application.
-> You can use Enhancement Framework Technology.
-> Look out for Blogs by Thomas Weiss. They are very useful.
-> Easiest way out to create new button would be as :
     -> Put your application in display mode.
     -> There is button for Enhancement in the tool bar (Spiral shaped).
     -> Press that button and create a new enhancement.
    -> Now add any UI Element you want to add.
     -> In Enhancement Framework we do have some Post Exit and Pre Exit Methods.
    -> Some Enhancement Points are already given by Standard SAP.
   -> You can write the logic there and activate the Enhancement.
Check out this link for basic idea about enhancement.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/0e/4d3e42fc94aa04e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/9cd334f3-0a01-0010-d884-f56120039915
I hope above links will be helpful.
Thanx.

Modification of Web Dynpro ABAP ESS Travel application

Hi,
I'm familiar with the modification process of ESS Web Dynpro Java applications using NWDI. However I have to adda button a view in the "Create Expense Report" iView which is a Web Dynpro ABAP application from ERP 6 Ehp3. On the click of this button a pdf report should be shown. The Web Dynpro ABAP application is FITE_EXPENSES.
Can anyone tell me what is the process for modifying ESS WD ABAP code? Do I copy and create a new application and then modify?
I'm not getting any documentation on this on SDN or SAP Help.
Regards,
Manish

Please try to avoid modification of WD4As. This is the last resort!
FITE_EXPENSES uses the WD-Component FITV_FPM_START, there it has the Application Configuration "FITE_EXPENSES". The Application COnfiguration is mapped with the Component Configuration "FITV_FPM_EXPENSES" (this is just for your interest how things are mapped here).
Bottom line the Application uses the WD-Component FITE_VC_GENERAL_DATA you can open it via TA SE80 as above poster suggested. Here. navigate to Views and open the View GENERAL_DATA_VIEW. Navigate to Tab METHODS, open Hook-Method WDDOMODIFYVIEW. Here you can make an implicit enhancement at the end of the method and dynamically generate a Button in runtime, this would be a cleaner approach than hard modification of the standard Layout.. I reccomend you to consider this!
best regards, Lukas

ERP 2005 Upgrade

Has anyone upgraded to ERP 2005 that is using the SPL for document splitting but you have not implemented the new GL yet?
We are testing for our ERP 2005 upgrade and our document splitting rules are not working correctly anymore. OSS says that changes were made in document splitting for the "new GL" but we are not using the new GL yet. We need document splitting to work like it did before the upgrade but we don't know which config settings to change.

Hi Ian,
I came through your solution when I was looking for the similar kind of problem. Here is my question. If have not selected the 'Select for transport' button after modifcations and before continuing with ACT_700 phase, can I select this button after I complete the upgrade on the DEV and before continuing with QAS? Would the upgrade still consider the SPAU adjustments to be included automatically in the QAS? If not, what is the alternative to move these transports manually?
My other question is, you have mentioned not to add SPDD transports to make it automatic. So, how else the SPDD modifications can be moved to QAS?
Your response ASAP is highly appreciated.
Thank you.

UPGRADE RELATED TO OSS MODIFICATIONS

Hi all,
we are on verge of upgradtion form 4.6c to ECC 6.00
we have a lot of programs where we have applied oss notes.
Do i need to apply the oss notes in the new version ECC 6.00 too.
How can i know whether SAP has provided the same note modifications in new version i.e ECC 6.00
IN THAT CASE I DON'T HAVE TO APPLY OSS NOTE AGAIN.
Where does SPAU AND SPDD COME IN TO PICTURE
let me know if iam wrong
THANKS
SWATHI

Hi Swathi,
For the Upgrade to ECC 6.0 from 4.6c, most of OSS notes applied in 4.6c will be anyway added in the standard delivered system.
All the previous delivered OSS notes will be added in some of the Packages or patches of the ECC 6.0 system if these notes are applicable to ECC 6.0.
You can check in one way that check the applicability of the OSS notes you used whether it is applicable to version ECC 6.0 or added in package number.
Check if that package is in the upgraded ECC 6.0 or not.
I was in one of the upgrade project 4.6c to ECC 6.0, As far as my experience most of the previous notes are included.
Once the System is upgraded and there are some modifications done to standard programs, then we will have the issue of whether to go with the standard or use our modifications. In that case SPDD and SPAU are useful.
Please check the following links which will help you in using the above transactions -
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/60/d6ba7bceda11d1953a0000e82de14a/content.htm
Please use the following link to know the delta changes in the versions functionally -
http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
Also, please refer to the OSS notes 741821, 852235 and 896144 for more details on the limitation of ECC 5.0 and ECC 6.0 respectively.
http://service.sap.com/upgrade-erp
You can touch base with me whenever required, so that I can share my experiences with you.
Hope this helps you.

EWM GR not to ERP

Hi Gurus
I finished GR in EWM(7.0) by inbound dilevery,but not success in ERP (AFS).
and I found the error 'internal error SELECT_ASN_DATA AT_TMSTMP' by SMQ2
and I found the total error as fellowing
Internal error SELECT_ASN_DATA AT_TMSTMP
Internal error /SPE/TSEG_MOD_TIMESTAMP TSEG_READ
Internal error /SPE/TSEG_MOD_TIMESTAMP TSEG_READ
Inconsistency between parameters of the collected messages
You cannot change status of inb.dlv. head 0180000148 from 'non-hold' to 'hold'
Error during inbound delivery modification
the function module is '/SPE/INB_DELIVERY_REPLACE'
how can I solve it by configuration or notes?
thanks and best regards
Edited by: jun hu on Apr 14, 2011 12:49 PM

Thanks，
but I checked the DATE MAPPING in EWM ides integrated with ERP IDES,
there is not any deference .
Sorry, I retest the proccess and found the error trigered when unload
b.r.
Edited by: jun hu on Apr 15, 2011 8:38 AM

SAP ERP == XI == SAP POS (Customer Data Maintenance)

Dear Friends,
   We are doing the scenario SAP ERP ==> XI ==> SAP POS. This is IDoc to File scenario. The file is picked from FTP site by receiver(where the Triversity server pick ascii files).
   Here problem is after picking the file, data is not inserted, updated, deleted in the Customer Profile table of Triversity Store Manager. (We follow the Technical Reference Guide for creating files).
Regards,
Jagan.

HI experts ,
   After integration of SAP retail and SAP POS, we are receiving file from PI for e.g DEPTTXN.asc (below) ,
              As according to DEPTTXN.ASC file format update type ,department, department group ,description should be of Decimal 2.0,decimal4.0, decimal 3.0 and string 20 respectively,
              But we are receiving data in below mentioned format ,because of that when we are posting this file to Xpress sever-> parm folder to view its data in Store manager we are not
              able see all the details of DEPTTXN.asc ,only price point details with the linked category and department are shown there. We are facing same difficulties with other two files also.
       Do we have to do some modification in PI for the naming of department and department group?
It will be great help ,if you can guide us to solve this particular issue.
99
2,MC11111,MC11110,"class. dresses, long",,,,,N,N,,Y,,,,,,Y,,,N,N,,,,,Y,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Y,,,,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,,,,,,,,,N,N
2,MC11142,MC11140,"skirts, short",,,,,N,N,,Y,,,,,,Y,,,N,N,,,,,Y,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Y,,,,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,,,,,,,,,N,N
2,MC11151,MC11150,"shirts, 1/1 sleeve",,,,,N,N,,Y,,,,,,Y,,,N,N,,,,,Y,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Y,,,,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,,,,,,,,,N,N
2,MC11152,MC11150,"shirts, 1/2 sleeve",,,,,N,N,,Y,,,,,,Y,,,N,N,,,,,Y,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Y,,,,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,,,,,,,,,N,N
2,MC11422,MC11420,"sweatshirts",,,,,N,N,,Y,,,,,,Y,,,N,N,,,,,Y,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Y,,,,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,,,,,,,,,N,N
2,MC11441,MC11440,"shirts,le.1/1 sleeve",,,,,N,N,,Y,,,,,,Y,,,N,N,,,,,Y,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Y,,,,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,,,,,,,,,N,N
2,MC11451,MC11450,"ties, classic",,,,,N,N,,Y,,,,,,Y,,,N,N,,,,,Y,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Y,,,,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,,,,,,,,,N,N
2,MC13101,MC13100,"meat, sausage",,,,,N,N,,Y,,,,,,Y,,,N,N,,,,,Y,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Y,,,,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,,,,,,,,,N,N
2,MC13102,MC13100,"fruits, vegetables",,,,,N,N,,Y,,,,,,Y,,,N,N,,,,,Y,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Y,,,,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,,,,,,,,,N,N
2,MC13103,MC13100,"dairy goods",,,,,N,N,,Y,,,,,,Y,,,N,N,,,,,Y,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Y,,,,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,,,,,,,,,N,N
2,MC13104,MC13100,"bread and pastries",,,,,N,N,,Y,,,,,,Y,,,N,N,,,,,Y,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Y,,,,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,,,,,,,,,N,N
2,MC14501,MC14500,"garden equipment",,,,,N,N,,Y,,,,,,Y,,,N,N,,,,,Y,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Y,,,,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,,,,,,,,,N,N
2,MC22003,MC22000,"Rolling trolleys",,,,,N,N,,Y,,,,,,Y,,,N,N,,,,,Y,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Y,,,,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,,,,,,,,,N,N
2,MC_ECKP,,"price point",,,,,N,N,,Y,,,,,,Y,,,N,N,,,,,Y,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Y,,,,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,N,,,,,,,,,N,N
HI jagan.
could you please share your mobile number.
regards
abhishek
09008833411
Edited by: abhishek011 on Jul 16, 2009 7:56 AM

Need clarification on application of OSS Release Note:391846 in SAP ERP 6.0

Hi Experts,
We are upgrading the SAP R/3 4.7 to SAP ERP 6.0 in one of our client. In SAP R/3 4.7, OSS Note:391846 has been applied for Automatic Explosion of BOM while converting the planned order. I would like to know whether this functionality is covered in SAP ERP 6.0 or is it required to apply the same OSS note in SAP ERP 6.0?
Thanks in advance.
Venkat Bandaru

Dear Venkat,
note 391846 is also valid for ERP600.
This modification is not part of the SAP Standard Release 600. It's also in 600 a modification.
If you want this function you have to implement the note again in your actual release.
Regards,
Sabine

Catalog views for ERP E-Commerce for MySAP ERP ECC 5.0

We are implementing the R/3 version of CRM-ISA (ERP E-Commerce for MySAP ERP ECC 5.0).
We need to implement product catalog views to allow filtering based on specific attributes.
We have created a custom function module Z_ISA_READ_CATALOG_COMPLETE to replace ISA_READ_CATALOG_COMPLETE and Z_ISA_CUSTOMER_READ_CAT_VIEWS to replace ISA_CUSTOMER_READ_CAT_VIEWS.
But when we test from ISA the FM Z_ISA_READ_CATALOG_COMPLETE does not get invoked through RFC.
There is an SAP NOTE 998453 that we checked but it is still a pilot version.
Has anyone implemented the catalog views without the notes? Can we do the catalog views without the note? If so, how can we meke custom FM work? Please advice.
Thanks,
VK

Check the following.
1. The XCM file modification-config.xml replaces both the function modules
2. The checkbox to use the catalog views is checked for your webshop
3. Catalog is published to TREX and you are using TREX catalog instead of Memory catalog.
I don't think these notes work without TREX. I'd be interested in learning if anyone successfully implemented Catalog views with ECC ECO without using TREX.
- Kishore

Leading zeros in SAP ME materials that come from SAP ERP

Hello!
When materials are transfered from the SAP ERP side via MII to SAP ME it can be observed that material numbers have leading zeros. For example a material number is created in SAP ME like 0000000123456 instead of 123456.
I think this behaviour can be changed in the XLST transformations, which are part of SAPMEINT.
Is this the usual way to fulfill the requirement "No leading zeros for SAP ME material numbers"?
It can be observed that for example the shop orders don't have the leading zeros, when they are created in SAP ME.
Of cause, when confirmations are sent back to SAP ERP the corresponding XSLT transformation adds again these '0',
it is somehow necessary for SAP ERP for the shop order lookup.
I see one disadvantage when using modified XLST transformations.
Each time a new version of SAPMEINT is deployed a check shoukld be made from our side, if there are changes in the original XSLT transformations.
So what is the statement of direction from the SAPMEINT developers?
Kr,
Erich Lind

We see the same problem for the leading zeros. There is no consistency in this case.
Also the SAPMEINT Enhanced planned order report is triggering only for material with leading zeros. In this case you can't modify anything to prevent this. No XSLT modification possible there.
Can we get any statement from SAP?!?

Modification of BP in ERP.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for