Modifying LIKP fields by BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CHANGE

Hello all,
I want to modify wadat_ist and lifex fields of likp table, with this bapi.
But i couldnt figure out how to use this extension structures.
Can anyone help me?
Thanks.

Apparently, you'll have to create a CMOD implementation for enhancement V50B0001, component FM EXIT_SAPLV50I_010. Here, you can code the logic to change those two header fields depending what you pass to the BAPI in EXTENSION1 or EXTENSION2.
It's up to you to decide which one do you want to use.. EXTENSION1 is unstructured data; EXTENSION2 has field name, value etc. references so it may be simpler for your purpose.
In the CMOD project, you code the changes to the delivery header (CS_VBKOK) which contains both of the fields you need to change.
I didn't use this particular extension yet, but that's what it looks like by peeking at the code.

Similar Messages

User exit to modify likp-vsbed during the creation of the delivery

Hi ,
I need to find an exit to modify LIKP-VSBED while I am trying to create a delivery(VL01N) from a sales order . I did not find any exits . Also when I referred to the OSS notes , I found this note elevant 396378 . From the note I guess it is not possible to modify the above said field .
Can anyone help me out with this .
Regards ,
Varun .
Message was edited by:
        varun sonu

Hi,
In the include MV50AFZ1 check the following user exit
      FORM USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_LIKP                              *
      This userexit can be used to move some fields into the        *
      delivery header workaerea LIKP.                               *
      This form is called, when a header is created                 *
      This form is called at the end of form LIKP_FUELLEN.          *
FORM USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_LIKP.
Thanks,
Naren

Looking for a third party utility to replace a file's "modified Date" field

For video files, apparently the organizer displays the thumbnails with the date taken from the file's "modified date" field. For some wierd reason (which I'm discussing with Adobe CS) the organizer changed the date of all my videos in the "modified date" field, so now the chronology of all my video clips in the organizer went down the drain.
Is there a third party utility to replace the "modified date" field of a file with the original shot date? (which in W7 is shown in the "Date" field).
In other words: for every video file in my library, I want to take the date from the "Date" field and put it in the "Modified Date" field
Thanks for your help.

OK thanks.
I've found a utility that modifes several of the date fields.
Now, I just want to be sure that I don't screw this up...
Which of the several date fields of a file holds the actual shot date?
Which of the date fields is used by the organizer to "organize" the video files (avi and mov's) chronologically?
Thanks for your help

EasySign: Can I or can't I modify filled fields?!

Is it just me, or is Acrobat EchoSign a user-hostile piece of garbage? I am using Reader 10.1.3. Below is a form I'd love to fill out and perhaps "sign" with a TIFF of my signature, but first I have to type in some fields. Getting to this point took me 20 minutes this morning:
(Sorry about the furry JPEG; Adobe Forums only passively informed me after I tried saving to three non-antialiasing "content types" that it would only accept the JPEG.)
If you will look at the name field under the "YOUR INFORMATION" section, you'll see three blue blotches reflecting three multiple-selections of zero-length text area boxes from the list at the right. Those objects are the result of my patiently left-clicking the I-beam over my name in an effort to modify the text I've entered in each field. Each time I did so, I would briefly see a blip appear under the I-beam, but it would not allow me to edit my text. The blip, of course, was a zero-length text area box being created. I persisted because at one moment I swear I did see an arrow icon and it let me make a blue selection over one patch of my text, but then for some reason when I typed nothing happened, and then the apparition vanished and I could not repeat it. And it was only after a few minutes, when in frustration I started playing with right-clicking over a text field, that I discovered the "Comments List" so useless to me.
There are now dozens of these mini-boxes all over the sheet (just look at how the "Comments List" has 86 entries instead of the 12 that actually contain text). But this means I can't edit something once I've finished a text, doesn't it? If so, why not? Why is it not clear to me, a sophisticated user? Why the bizarre and unpredictable behavior? Or am I some kind of idiot, not having found the correct incantation? Perhaps one of Adobe's priestly programmers or myriad sycophants will now enlighten us all, tacitly suggesting that it's merely my stupidity, for They Knew the Blessed Secret Their First Time.
I've searched pretty exhaustively for a solution to this and so far have found nothing, but perhaps that's because I've only budgeted 45 minutes for this would-be simple task. Am I going to have to pull this file into Illustrator, or print it out and mail it?
Twenty or so years ago, I was probably the first or second person outside of Mountain View to be shown the alpha of Carousel. Since that moment -- and despite having held out hope numerous times -- I still can't easily fill out a document online without heartache. Why can't I edit a field? What am I going to have to do when I want to modify a multi-line field? My workarounds over the years have run the gamut of every possible thing you can imagine, from scanning into Photoshop or Illustrator or Quark or InDesign; to blind fields and double-exposures on a laser printer; to glue; even to hacking the fields into the PostScript with setfonts and movetos and shows.
I've spent 40 years in the graphic arts; half of them I've wrestled with Acrobat, on some pretty complex work products having features of debatable benefit when shoehorned into PDF format. When it comes to the simple single-page monochrome Letter/A4 form -- the most abundant portable document on Earth -- we are now in Acrobat v10 and all I want to do is easily fill out a form and sign it and e-mail it back and I still can't.
Why is life so much harder now than when I could run this through a typewriter, Adobe? What are you really doing about it for the billions? How much more of our lives' valuable moments are you going to squander?
(P.S. What a difference almost a day makes: Hours after beginning this -- and just before submitting this article -- I myself have discovered the incantation with a few minutes' further experimentation over the many already expended. I can now recreate the arrow and edit the field. It is actually not difficult, but it is far from obvious and it is the furthest thing from good UI technique. Nevertheless, I now Know The Blessed Secret, or at least one part of it. But it does not change my position above. Can you surmise why, O Adobe Priesthood of Insufferable Sanctimony? If it takes a seasoned programmer hours to learn out the combination, what makes you think Grandma and Grandpa are ever going to figure it out?)

You do it unconsciously; we are all forced into these mentalities by our circumstances. But all three of you experts were wrong about who listens, at least when you pray as loudly as I do:
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Kevin M Lynch <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Peter,
This is Kevin M. Lynch and I run the Acrobat & Document Services business at Adobe (coincidentally our CTO is also named Kevin Lynch, but I’m not him - I run the document business).
I saw your forum post (http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1058887) and want to apologize for the difficulties you’re having filling out and signing a form.
It’s certainly our intention to make this a very easy process so I’m glad you went to the trouble to let us know that it was a frustrating experience for you.
Frustrating to me, but mainly because it is no doubt frustrating for (literally) billions of others less sophisticated than me. That is my main concern, and the ball I keep my eyes on. I feel terribly sorry for them.From what I can gather, you had no problem knowing where to go and click the “Sign” panel on the right and then clicking the add text button (and let me know if otherwise).
Well, that's a separate issue. I intuited that it was what I might need to fill out a basic form. But most people won't get even that.
But then there were two issues that prevented filling out and signing the form from being drop-dead easy:
1) After adding text the first time (which was hopefully easy – let me know if not), you couldn’t go back and correct it. Every time you tried, you ended up inserting a new blank text block. It would have been much nicer if we had a wider selection range so that if you clicked anywhere near a field that was already added we just selected it and allowed you to edit it.
I don't know about the width of the selection range; it seemed to me that there was *no* selection tolerance. I was rolling all over the text looking for it to catch and it wouldn't, hence 75 null textareas. (Possibly the cursor just was refusing to change from I-beam to arrow, I reasoned, and clicked, but did not get into an edit mode.) My sense is that it was not going to give me an arrow no matter where I went. My workaround (which few of your millions will be patient enough to discover) was forcibly exit the I-beam mode by going to the "Place Signature" mode and then re-enter the "Add Text" mode, which then readily showed me an arrow whenever I rolled near/over a textarea, and then let me click into the textarea and modify it.
I'm not on the subject machine. I'm on a brand-new laptop now and just upgraded its Reader from the factory 10.0.0 to 10.1.4 to get EchoSign and see if I can reproduce it here. On the same document, I appear now to be able to roll over created textareas and click the I-beam over them and get in. So it's not a global issue. The exhibiting machine is, I think, a Lenovo with Windows XP, but I will have to check this. If you need specific installation information to help isolate, please tell me what you need.
But I'm seeing some wrong behaviors even now:
While in "Add Text" mode (even when appearing to function properly, as on this installation), the elongated I-beam cursor does not morph to anything else as I roll over, so there is insufficient feedback prompting me to know I can modify the field.
This is inconsistent with what I experience when I escape "Add Text" mode. (I find I can escape "Add Text" either by entering "Insert Signature," as I note above, or in another way, by manually closing the editing palette by clicking its close box.) When I move out, I appear to be in a free-cursor mode; it now prompts me with a change to an arrowhead cursor whenever I roll over a textarea, and then it puts me into something unexpected called "Typewriter" mode (the only surface indication of the difference is that a lozenge in the editing palette now says "Typewriter" instead of "Add Text".
It is altogether unclear the functional difference between "Typewriter" mode and "Add Text" mode, or the purpose of having two different identities for two modes that seem to share some functions. Their behavior, however, is different enough to cause confusion. This could be streamlined quite a bit.
Editing text (new or modifying) in either of these two text modes appears to be operating one pixel below the finished text after repainting.
2) You couldn’t add a TIFF image as signature. I’ll have to have my team look into this as I can add one without any problems on my system. However, like you, I don’t understand why we don’t have both TIF & TIFF in the filter so I’ll have to follow up with my team to see if there is any reason for that.
This may also be local to that machine I was on Friday. When I return to Chicago I can check this, if it's important to you and if you are confident that doing so will bear fruit.
Am I correct in that those were the two issues or were there others? Once you went off the beaten path into comments you could see that we use the commenting capability, but our intent is to have it easy enough that you would never go there. If it helps to clean up your document, you can select each blank comment in the right side panel and hit the delete key to get rid of them.
See above, which gives you some more information. As you can glean from between all of my acerbic comments, I felt that the user experience was in many places carelessly thought through. You provide another case in point above, speaking of "Comments" mode. The three modes -- "Add Text," "Typewriter," and "Comments" -- obviously are genetically related. Their respective purposes become indistinct and confusing to the casual user. The basic shift from mode to mode is confusing; tool depth level and state are uncertain; use metaphor for each tool is nonstandard, inconsistent, and counterintuitive; visual feedback is lacking or inconsistent; and I think in some generals and some specifics each tool's entry point and interface needs to be reworked. I realize that you're constrained by the Reader API UI, so you don't have infinite flexibility, but there are still some basic things you can do.
Even with a working installation as I have here, it is confusing. On my View menu, I have two "Sign" and two "Tools" items. Why? I can't seem to find how to get back into "Typewriter" mode. What is it? Where is its entry point? Is it part of Sign or is it part of something else?
Form filling could use some user workshopping to figure out how to make it intuitive. Starting from the top, ideally, Acrobat Forms, if implemented in a document, should be user-seamless with EchoSign. Whether a document is forms-enabled or not, ideally the tools should have the same look and feel. I am skeptical about that being easy. But George Johnson raised the point that you now have two distinct products serving (from the user's perspective) identical purposes. If Reader is going to be user-centric, that proposition needs to be taken into account right away. Starting with that, a universal text editing palette for both Forms and EchoSign (whatever the underlying difference) might be in order. Distinguishing among text "in stone" (the immutable background PDF); malleable superimposed text fields and images (e.g., signature); and comments needs to be treated.
If I were god, just off the top of my head, tomorrow I would open all Acrobat documents by default in a basic "Add Text [e.g., fields and comments] or Image [e.g.,signature]" mode with a universal text-cum-graphics palette, similar to what you have but switchable within between text and image (consider PageMaker's old universal palette, dumbed down). If forms-enabled, the text palette would be activated and the cursor inside Field 1 ready to type. If not, you have an I-beam as the default. You could switch to Image mode within the palette and the palette would provide a signature subfunctionality (including EchoSign's capability of retaining as default signatureStamp), or other image type. Maybe outside that mode is panning and zooming, maybe panning and zooming are hierarchically equal to those two modes. I at least believe that the key to this is that text / comments // signatureStamp / images should now be as basic to Reader as pan/zoom. How to make those two modes intuitively switchable by the grandparents is probably not so tricky, but I would have to think about that a bit more.
I appreciate the time you’ve already taken to struggle through this and provide feedback. I personally want to eliminate the need to print out, sign, and fax back these stupid forms!
You and a few billion others. Thanks for the prompt response.
Regards,
Kevin

To modify a field in a database table based record identification by primar

hi
i want to to modify a field in a database table based record identification by primary key filed and two more fields
ie customer (primary key
i want to modify record from intenal table the record existing with primary key field customer
the status field needs to be mofied as " value rolled"
the below code is happening
loop at it_record into wa_Record
wa_inv-customer (primary key) = wa_Record=custome
wa_inv-date = wa_Record-date
...so one
append wa_inv to it_invest
clear wa_inv
endloop.
if not it_invest is initial
modify TABle1 ( this table is data base table which needs to be mofified) based on the primary key field
and also date field and status field which is not primary key.
regards
arora

Hi there.
Your requirement is to update a Z Database table from your internal table, right? You have several options:
LOOP AT it_invest INTO wa_inv.
UPDATE dbtable
     SET date = wa_inv-date
   WHERE prim_key = wa_inv-prim_key
     AND any_field = wa_inv-any_field.
ENDLOOP.
or
LOOP AT it_invest INTO wa_inv.
UPDATE dbtable FROM wa_inv. "if wa_inv of same type of dbtable
ENDLOOP.
In the first example, I wrote any field because you can update dbase table, filtering for fields that don't belong to the primary key. However, remember that you will change all records that respect the key you used (so, in your case, use the primary key).
Regards.
Valter Oliveira.

Modify form field properties

This question was posted in response to the following article: http://help.adobe.com/en_US/acrobat/pro/using/WS58a04a822e3e50102bd615109794195ff-7df8.w.h tml

This is not easily scripted as yo need to provide the exact date pattern you want to use.
You can run the following script through your JavaScript console in Acrobat,. You will need to modify the field names and date format as needed to meet your needs.
// define an array of fields to change
var aFields = new Array("Text1", "Text2", "Text3", "Textn");
// define a character string for the date format
var cDateFormat = "dd-mmm-yyyy";
// define a field object to be used for setting the date format
var oField;
// loop through the field names and add the date format
for(i = 0; i < aFields.length; i++) {
// get the field object for i element in aFields
oField = this.getField(aFields[i]);
// set the date format
oField.setAction("Format", AFDate_FormatEx( cDateFormat));
// end loop field names - get next field name for processing
The Acrobat JavaScript Console (Your best friend for developing Acrobat JavaScript)
There are other tools and methods to make forms besides the form Wizard. Most of us avoid it for most forms.

Modify the Field Type of standard Table fields in a Query

Hello. I have a question.
Is there a way to "modify" the field type for standard table fields that are included in a Query?
I made a simple query out of a join of tables, but several fields have a lot of decimals, and I would like to present them in the query without any decimals, just as a regular "N" field.
I tried the possibility of creating extra local fields where all I do is transfer the value to the new "N" field, but I have many fields like this, so if there's a better way; I'd prefer that.
Maybe somewhere in the InfoSet there's a way to modify the type of the standard table fields?
Thank you.

Hi,
This document may help you out.
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/d2/cb4468455611d189710000e8322d00/frameset.htm|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/d2/cb4468455611d189710000e8322d00/frameset.htm]
Cheers,

How to create a workflow in SharePoint 2013 that modifies the Modified By field?

Hello,
I like to create a workflow that updates the "modified by" field in a list. Is this possible?
Thanks,
Paul

the built-in audit fields (Created, Created By, Modified, Modified By) are managed internally by SharePoint. Workflows can edit metadata, but those changes will be made using the user who started the workflow, or by the author (if the workflow is set to
impersonate the author).
You cannot change the audit data.
Scott Brickey
MCTS, MCPD, MCITP
www.sbrickey.com
Strategic Data Systems - for all your SharePoint needs

How do I copy over "Created By" & "Modified By" field values to a new library, using PowerShell?

I have a site that was migrated from SP 2007 to 2013, using a docave tool...this works fine and everything seems to be okay. However I now have to move documents from one Library to a new one, along with all associated metadata. I have a PowerShell script
I am using to do this and it is working...for the most part...except for copying the authoring metadata. So when I run this PowerShell script, I get my "Created By" and "Modified By" fields updated with the "WindowsAccount" user
account that performed the migration. This is what is confusing to me...after the migration, when I look at my Library, these fields are displayed correctly. Meaning I have documents that were created by John Smith, and modified by Jane Smith, showing up with
the right metadata in the library after migration...but when I run my script to copy the documents to a new library, the output is not John Smith or Jane Smith but the "windowsAccount" user that performed the migration. Here is what my script looks
like, in trying to get the right values to show.
$sWeb = Get-SPWeb $SourceWebURL
$sList = $sWeb.Lists | ? {$_.Title -eq $SourceLibraryTitle}
$dWeb = Get-SPWeb $DestinationWebURL
$dList = $dWeb.Lists | ? {$_.title -like $DestinationLibraryTitle}
$AllFolders = $sList.Folders
$RootFolder = $sList.RootFolder
$RootItems = $RootFolder.files
foreach($RootItem in $RootItems){
$sBytes = $RootItem.OpenBinary()
$dFile = $dList.RootFolder.Files.Add($RootItem.Name, $sBytes, $true)
$AllFields = $RootItem.Item.Fields | ? {!($_.sealed)}
$User = $sWeb.EnsureUser($RootItem.Author)
$UserField = New-Object Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFieldUserValue($sWeb,$User.ID,$User.LoginName)
write-host "User's Name: "$UserField.User.Name.ToString()
Has anyone experienced something like this before? If so, what is causing this and how can I get my script to start displaying the right data for "Created By" and "Modified By"?
Thanks,

This is the expected behavior. Both "Created By" (internal name Author) and "Modified By" (internal name Editor) will be set to the user running the script. In order to update theses fields in the destination item with the values present
in source item, the script needs to be modified. Read the values of these fields in source and update them in destination using SplistItem.SystemUpdate() method, like:
$Author = $sWeb.EnsureUser($RootItem.Author) $Editor = $sWeb.EnsureUser($RootItem.Editor) $destinationItem["Author"] = $Author$destinationItem["Editor"] = $Editor$destinationItem.SytemUpdate()
Blog | SharePoint Learnings CodePlex Tools |
Export Version History To Excel |
Autocomplete Lookup Field

"Modified By" Field Value is same "Created By" field value after the workflow completion.Sp 2010 workflows

Hi All,
I have a work flow A attached to List List1
I have Added an item(now created by and modified by are same)
Next Person B modified
Ideally created by value and modified by value should be different, but they are same after the workflow completion
This is very strange as i am not modifying modified by field any where
Please let me know any one has faced similar problem
Thanks
Ravi
Ravi

The workflow will run as the person who initiated it. As such if the workflow starts when an item is created then it'll be running as the user who created the item.
When the workflow changes anything the 'modified by' field will be updated to show the identity the workflow is running under. I think that explains your behaviour?
To change it you could use an impersonation step but that would simply replace one name with another. I don't think you've got access to the 'SystemUpdate()' method in workflows which would allow you to avoid updating the modfiied by and modified date fields.

Problem to modify the field "location" in an AP on WCS

Hello everybody,
I have a problem to modify the field "location" in an access point on WCS.
In fact, when i try to modify this field and then apply the modification, i have this error message :
"Error(s): You must correct the following error(s) before proceeding:
Error:Global Username and Password are not configured on the associated controller. Please configure username and password on the associated controller before disabling 'Override Global Username Password'."
I made the modification on Chrome and Firefox but I always have the error message.
Nevertheless, i don't have this error message with other access points and other access points are configured without the option "Override Global Username Password".
I'm obliged to make the modification directly in the controller and not in WCS.
The problem is that i want to make the modification directly in WCS.
Could you help me please ?
Thank you in advance.

When i make the modification directly in WCS, i have no problem, it syncs good.
The version of WCS is 7.0.230.0.
The version of the controller is 7.0.240.0 and the field recovery image version is 7.0.112.21.
Version
7.0.230.0
Version
7.0.230.0
Version
7.0.230.0

Creating a modifiable form field

Hi,
I would like to create a modifiable form field that maps onto a directory server multi-valued field. This field should have the ability to add a value or remove a value as well as displaying the contents of the list. I've spent time reviewing the Workflows, Forms and Views (v8) document but it's not clear how to achieve this sort of field. Is it possible?
Regds
CK

The ListEditor component is what you are looking for.
Check out this code snippet directly from the documentation:
<Field name='accounts[Sim1].Group'>
<Display class='ListEditor' action='true'>
    <Property name='listTitle' value='stuff'/>
    <Property name='allowTextEntry'>
      <Boolean>true</Boolean>
    </Property>
    <Property name='ordered'>
      <Boolean>true</Boolean>
    </Property>
</Display>
<Expansion>
     <ref>accounts[Sim1].Group</ref>
</Expansion>
</Field>The important stuff in this case is the field name, in this case accounts[Sim1].Group. This means you are displaying/modifying the contents of an attribute "Group" on resource "Sim1". Change this to suit your needs.

Modify form field value

I have the PDF form with several fields. I want to set the value of one field depending on selection made by the user in other field. I am trying to use if statement but it does not work for me. I have copied below the script I am trying to use.
form1.#pageSet[0].Page1.Table.Table3[0].Row1.Cell1::change - (JavaScript, client)
if (oField.rawValue == "Service Alert")
this.resolveNode("Cell4").rawValue = "A";
else if (oField.rawValue == "Service Bulletin")
this.resolveNode("Cell4").rawValue = "B";
When user selects Service Alert in Cell1 I want the value of Cell4 to be set to A and if Service Bulletin is selected I want the value of Cell4 to be set to B.
Can someone help me with the script. I have done a bit of searching and tested verious syntax but nothing did work. I hope someone will help me to have it working.
Regards,
Tony

Thank you very much for your help, but it did not work for me. I have decided to reply and to send you the form. Could you please have a look on what I have done and try to fix it. I want to add action to Cell1 to modify Cell4 in row 1 of the form, top on the blue background.
Regards,
Tony Pluta
Engineering Technical Coordinator / Graphics Designer, Engineering
Rail
Description: C:\Users\tony.pluta\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Signatures\UGLLimited.gif
16 Broadmeadow Rd | Broadmeadow NSW 2292 | Australia
Direct: +61 2 9492 1277 | Mobile: +61 403 399 167
Fax: +61 2 9462 1383
Email: [email protected]
Web: www.ugllimited.com<http://www.ugllimited.com/>
Please consider our environment footprint before printing this e-mail
From: kvdvijaykumar [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, 29 May 2013 4:14 PM
To: Tony Pluta
Subject: modify form field value
Re: modify form field value
created by kvdvijaykumar<http://forums.adobe.com/people/kvdvijaykumar> in LiveCycle Designer - View the full discussion<http://forums.adobe.com/message/5360639#5360639

Modify the field TXJCD_ST of RFC_CALCULATE_TAXES_DOC

HI,
I have a requirements to modify the field TXJCD_ST of RFC_CALCULATE_TAXES_DOC with the ShipTo jurisdiction code.
What i found is the user exit exit_saplfytx_user_001 that sends to the RFC a list of fields that are modified. The field TXJCD_ST is not in the list of the user exit.
At this point i don't know how to do it , meaning pass the modified value of the TXJCD_ST to the RFC_CALCULATE_TAXES_DOC.
Does anyone know how to?
Regards, Oli

No, I did not see this particular scenario yet. If the Taxware guys say they can not configure their side like that, then this won't work. I just thought they could be able to do this because they can configure the structure of the USER_DATA field on their end. It is entirely possible that those fields that are explicitely part of the interface can not be added to USER_DATA.
You can still try my first suggestion
I wonder if that'll work. Theoretically it should since by looking at the related code and backtracking the calls, it looks like MOVE-CORRESPONDING statements are used - so having the TXJCD_ST as part of the allowed fields might just work OK.

Modify the field value in itab1 using itab2

Hi experts
I need some help.
My question is : I have ITAB1 contains IBLNO field it is a legacy value.
I want to modify this field.
Another internal table ITAB2 contains sap, legacy value of IBLNO(Cross refrenced table).my requirement is IBLNO of ITAB1 is modified with corresponding sap IBLNO in ITAB2.
plz help
Durga Parsad

Hi Durga,
You want to get following results -
1. You have ITAB1 containing IBLNO.
2. ITAB2 has IBLNO.
3. Modify ITAB1-IBLNO from ITAB2-IBLNO.
4. There must be some common value between the two tables. It has to be there otherwise the two records won't match.
Kindly find the following code for doing so -
LOOP AT ITAB2 INTO WA_ITAB2.
* Modify ITAB1 from workarea of ITAB2 for matching records
MODIFY ITAB1 FROM WA_ITAB2
    TRANSPORTING IBLNO                " Modify only IBLNO of ITAB1 for matching records
    WHERE FIELD1 = WA_ITAB2-FIELD1.   " Some common field between the ITAB1 & workarea of ITAB2
CLEAR WA_ITAB2.
ENDLOOP.
Hope this helps.
PS If the answer solves your query, plz close the thread by rewarding each reply and marking it Solved.
Regards

Modifying LIKP fields by BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CHANGE

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for