Money receipt problem

DEAR ALL,
facing a problem that there is money receipt has been generated against a sales order and by mistake sale order has been deleted by the user now this order is stuck in the money receipt how to resolve it please guide me

hello again.
when you create a cash sale transaction with BV type document and save this, it automatically creates a delivery.  therefore, you cannot delete this order because it already has a subsequent delivery.  also, when you save the BV order, the system generates a cash receipt using output type RD03;  however, please note that this is not the billing document.
after the delivery is created, you have to post goods issue in a separate transaction using VL02N.  after this, you create billing documents using VF01.
now, let's assume you still have not posted goods issue, and have not yet created the billing document.  at this point, you can still delete the delivery using VL02N.  only after deleting the delivery can you go back and delete the cash sales order.  the RD03 cash receipt as of this point merely takes the order number as the receipt number and there should be no bearing as the transaction has not been posted to accounting.
hope this helped you.
regards.

Similar Messages

  • Good receipt problem for subcontracting purchase order

    Good receipt problem for subcontracting purchase order
    with account assignment type ‘E’.
    After update to ECC 6.0. Do good receipt for subcontracting purchase order with account assigment 'E'.The system show the error message(KI235)----Two cost elements (Change in Stock (Subcontracting)&Outside processed fee) haven't CO account assignment.but the field status  for sale order is option entry , when I default cost center for the cost element  in OKB9.the system post the material document and generate the following accounting document.
    Doc.Type : WE ( Goods receipt ) Normal document
    Doc. Number    5000056065       Company code    1000         Fiscal year     2007
    Doc. date      2007.12.04       Posting date    2007.12.04   Period          12
    Calculate Tax
    Doc.currency   HKD
    tm PK Account    Account short text   Tx Cost Ctr   SaleOrder               Amount
    1 89 13500000   Stock-Work in proces                   1007823  10             274.4
    2 96 21210010   GR/IR Clearing                             1007823  10             205
    3 91 41010102   Chg in Stock(Subcon)    10901099  1007823  10            274.4
    4 86 41031000   Outside processed fe     10901099  1007823  10            205  
    5 99 13500000   Stock-Work in proces                    1007823  10            69.4
    6 81 41010101   Cost of Prod (Subco)                      1007823  10           69.40
    My problem is:
    When use MIGO to do good receipt for subcontracting Purchase order, for consumption account((Change in Stock (Subcontracting)-41010102&Outside processed fee--41031000) ,why the system don’t recognize the sale order filled as CO account assignment?

    Dear fanny chen
    Did you get a solution for your open question?
    I`m facing the same problem, so any help yould be appreciated.
    Regards

  • Automatic goods receipt problem

    Hi,
    I have assigned control key to the last phase in master recipe for which Auto. goods receipt is activated as shown below..
    Now  I created a process order and released now when while confirming the last operation i.e. phase 0180 through COR6N when I click on the Goods Movements button material is not visible in the list for auto GR...what could be the problem.? can somebody help...
    Thanks
    Kumar

    Hi Kumar,
    I have faced same issue while doing confirmation with COR6N.  In case of doing confirmation with T-code COR6N. auto good receipt & back flush of BOM component was not happening but when doing confirmation with T-code CORK then auto good receipt & back flush of BOM component it was working fine.
    The solution of this problem was Phase relationship was not maintain in master recipe.
    Check whether Phase relationship is maintain properly or not..
    Regard
    Yogesh

  • Return Receipt: problem to get status

    Hi Expert!
    I've a particular problem. I have implement the note for configure my SAP ECC 6.0 to use a SMTP node.
    All correct... if the destination is in my domain but otherwise....
    - Fact:
    I've implemented a system that start an automation if the mail is correctly delivered.
    - Problem:
    If fail the delivery to an e-mail account of my domain came back a NDR that notify the failure and I'm able to see this in my sapoffice folder.
    If the account is othe domain, sapoffice always say that is correctly delivered but isn't always true.
    To the sender in outlook arrive always a correct NDR for the failure
    I'm trying to follow two differnt way:
    1. Discover why sap are not able to understand the error
    2. Find a way to use sapoffice like outlook. (receive all the mail of account in sapoffice and interpretate this by abap code)
    Could you give me some indication of one of two ways for configure my system?
    Thanks in advance
    Anima

    Dear Anima,
    First of all be aware there is a limitation with NDR's as the SMTP protocal does not support these.
    So if there is an SMTP server in the mail relay the NDR's will be ignored.
    NDR's are only supported by the (E)SMTP protocal. Hope this helps.
    Thereafter also note the following:
    trn SCOT -> settings -> confirm of receipt -> should be turned on
    The problem here could be your mail routing settings on your recipient mail server.
    You might not have correctly configured a unique email domain for the Sending SAP system (most mail servers route mail via domain).
    So now the Non Delivery Request (NDR) is not correctly routed back to the sending SAP system and your mail will remain "in transit".
    So if you have configured your Sender email address as for example  User @ Domain.com, then your recipient mail server delivers your NDR back to your corporate email account (usually Outlook on desktop).
    So if this is the problem then to solve it you will have to configure a unique email domain for all the SAP systems you wish to send mails from.
    A good example is "User@<CLIENT>.<SID>.domain.com" and enter
    *@<CLIENT>.<SID>.domain.com into the address space (routing rule) of your coporate mail server.
    Now all NDR's created will be routed back to the correct sending SAP system.
    Kind Regards,
    Abhishek

  • Need for applecare service but lost buying receipt, problem?

    My macbook pro just went off suddenly and doesn't start again, the power cable only show a weak green light but nothing works
    I'll take it to an authorized service shop but i can't find my buying receipt, it's covered by applecare though, but would that be a problem?
    Thank you

    Reset the #1 SMC,
    ..Step by Step to fix your Mac
    And no it's not a problem for AppleCare as they can check your serial number and name on their database.

  • Post goods receipt problem of customer returns material

    hi,
    i have a problem while doing customer returns  in VL01N (PGR).system displays error msg.
    E VL 171
    Status of inpection lot xxxxxxx / partial lot 00000 does not allow goods issue.
    Material having inspection set up on material master with inspection type-06
    can u tell me how to solve this.
    thanks in advance.

    Hi prakash
    In MMR i think you must have assigned a quality inspection as 06 . so at the time doing delivery , and before PGI , quality inspection took place. Now when you are doing PGR , i think you just check the goods insepction data at item level in delivery data . and  remove that quality inspection  06 and then  save it . then only PGR will happen .
    Because you have assigned qualtiy inspection in MMR , system is checking , wheather the goods are good or not .that could be one of the reason it is not doing PGR, if u remove that 06 which is goods inspection then PGR will be done , then you can proceed further
    Prakash if you have done in adifferent way plz share with us and if it got solved also plz let us know
    Reward if useful
    Regards
    Srinath
    Edited by: sri nath on Apr 5, 2008 11:44 AM

  • Posting Goods Receipt Problem

    Dear All
            During Posting Goods Receipt, Systems showing error msg " Account determination for entry INT BSX_____     ______ 3000 not possible,
      so i used TCode OBYC and OMWD  for account determination, but it again showing same error msg,
    How to solve this, can anyone heip me.
    Thanks

    in obyc chect the posting rule of BSX
    generally it should be valuation class and gl account
    that is valuation class should be only tick
    i think in ur case both are tick
    so just tick valuation class in rules of BSX
    and make the entry on
    3000 and gl account
    also check what is the plant in PO
    and in OMWD give 0001 val grouping code
    if u do this i think ur issue will be solved

  • Goods Receipt Problem.

    I have a problem of reversing/clearing a PO. Here's the scenario.
    Ordered Qty = 100PC
    GR qty (november 2011) = 10 PC @ 1.65NZ
    GR qty (january 2012) = 90 PC @ 0.75NZ
    Would someone know why this is happening? As i understand, Net price would be locked after 1st GR. This item has no contract and inforecord.
    Then when i reversed the GR due to specific reasons
    Reverse GR qty (february 2012) = 100PC, the price would reflect 0.75NZ per pc. Please advise on how to correct this one as it's not balanced. I would need the 10PC excess to reflect 0.75NZ so that it will be zero. There is an excess of 53.5NZ that i need to clear.

    Hi,
    I have a problem of reversing/clearing a PO. Here's the scenario.
    Ordered Qty = 100PC
    GR qty (november 2011) = 10 PC @ 1.65NZ
    GR qty (january 2012) = 90 PC @ 0.75NZ
    1) chek your PO price for Material
    2) check which price you are adding in material planned cost in PO
    3) check your Material Mater price in Accounting view
    4) you have price controle S or V in MMR
    Regards
    Kailas Ugale

  • Subcontracting- Good Receipt Problem

    Dear All,
         In Subcontracting, when Posting Good Receipt, the systemshowing error msg " The G/L Account 891000 does not exist in company code.
    so i tried Tcode FS00, but it asking G/L Account, how can i create it, can any one help me.
    Thanks

    First of all check in FS00 whether the g/l account is present in any of your other company codes.If yes then copy the same for your present company code....
    If you have only one company code then you or your FI person has to create it through FS00........
    Regards,
    Indranil

  • Printing Receipt Problem

    Hello for all
    iam trying to print receipt invoice
    iam using BIXOLON SRP-350plusII printer
    when iam printing my report it doesn't print any
    but when chage report mod to charcter
    it prints . but not all my report and arabic fonts does't appear in agood way . it apears as astrang words ...

    Hi Manisha,
    Please run the program RFKORD80 and execute it.
    Now enter SAP18 by executing.
    Regards,
    Jigar

  • Copy from Goods Receipt Problem

    Hi Experts
    My user is creating AP Invoice , first he selects vender and then when he press button COPY FROM and he chooses Goods Receipt PO system does not show any Goods Receipt PO, but there are so many Goods Receipt PO on the system for this vender, please help what can be the reason, i have given full authorization of GRN to this user but still not showing when he select copy from
    Regards
    Ashar Anwer

    Hi!
    Ensure you are selected ITEM type in AP Invoice. There are 2 types of document we can raise in SAP ITEM or SERVICE. Your Goods Receipt PO will be of ITEM type so, you hv to select the same type in AP Invoice bfr saying Copy From.
    Get back if u hv any doubt.

  • Good Receipt problem

    Hi All,
    I use MB1C and choose Movement Type 561. And then, enter material, quantity... An error exist: Combination of plant BP01 and material type Packing does not exist.
    Pls give me solution to resolve it.
    Thank you,

    Don't reanimate discussions from 2008, and read the answers before touching it.
    The poster said: "That error was solved. But it has new error"
    So the entire discussion covered at this time 2 different questions, and if one reads to the end then you can even see that it were 3 different errors that got discussed.
    To which one is now your quesiton "Is this issue resolved?" ?
    And yes I am the opinion this is solved, as you could double check in hundred similar questions.

  • Constant inconsistency and problems

    Hi,
    it's occurred to me that everywhere I go recently people I know are reporting their terrible experiences with BT.  Where are they going so wrong, so constantly?  Why isn't anything ever done about the problems?  Why are people constantly being told one thing by the person on the end of the line and then something completely different by the next person.  Why are people constantly charged for services they haven't had?  Why are people connected when a phone recording of their conversation will clearly show that they've asked not to be connected.  I could go on and on.  
    I run a small business.  It is pretty much internet dependent.  I have had no consistently good phone or internet service since December!  There have been local problems and we have had engineers out on several occasions. When I ask about refunds or rebates to our phone plan and Business Broadband plan I'm told it will just be handled but then of course it never is.  I found out my mother was being double billed for internet use and had been for about a year.  Any due process for getting a refund promptly paid?  Of course not!  Any way of finding out if a refund is in the system without speaking to about ten different people?  Of course not!  
    I was eight months into my BT contract when my Broadband was cut off over the double billing issue.  I specifically said in the phone conversation I had with the operator that if my mother was being billed for internet I wanted it cut off but I stressed to the operator that I did not want my BT Business Broadband cut off.  Why was that operator so poorly trained that she couldn't explain that the problem was a billing one and that only one Broadband connection could come down our line.  Why couldn't she see that my Business Broadband was the only thing that could be cut off?  Which it then was leaving me with no, instead of merely sporadic, internet connection.  Having been cut off I began to look at the alternatives.  I was vehemently opposed to a two year contract, like lots of people I believe they restrict freedom of choice.  I rang BT and was treated as a new customer and throughout the conversation I was given prices etc.  I'd already rung Plusnet at this stage and they'd offered me a good deal with a one year contract.  The BT operator only let slip that it was a two year contract at the end of our conversation at which time I told him I didn't want to go ahead, very clearly.  He said he wouldn't connect me and it hadn't gone through.  Clearly not true as I began receiving a succession of messages ending in one that said my BT Broadband connection was now live.  When I complained BT tried to say that the operator was merely re-connecting me according to the terms of my original contract and had made me aware of that.  A total lie!  I don't believe for a minute my conversation with him or with the operator who assured me that my Business Broadband wouldn't be switched off, only whatever was causing my mother to be double billed.  Which as it turned out was of course my Business Broadband and it was BT's fault that we were even being double billed in the first place.  If these conversations were listened to it would be clear that all the fault lies with BT.  When I complained I was even told (in desperation once I brought up my pending Plusnet agreement) that I could have a one year contract after all, despite the original operator telling me that this was not possible.
    Come on BT, sort this web of incompetency out!  Have a close look at all your systems.  Make things clearer, more concise.  Achieve consistency, clarity, helpfulness.  It's taken me about four hours of valuable work time just to investigate how to make a proper complaint in a way that means someone trained and able will actually look into my case and listen to those conversations, give me a decision.
    So, in summary, the following:
    BT trying to charge me £190 for disconnection to get out of my contract even though it was their error that led to the disconnection
    Me being without service since 22nd December, mostly due to local problems and works.  No rebate offered to me for lack of Business Broadband and ability to make phone calls during this time
    My mother being double billed for over 12 months and not being immediately repaid this money
    The problems with Tesco highlight what can happen when suppliers consistently mistreat their customers.  BT may be all powerful with a tight grip on all of our media but no company is immune to a damaging backlash when the people they serve  are constantly provided with poor service.
    I can only hope my efforts mean that someone somewhere at BT is committed to helping people like me have a better experience of their company...
    Alex

    Hi lexman17,
    I'm sorry to read about the problems you've had with your BT service. This is a residential forum and we can't help with business products or services and from your first post it appears that your complaint centers around the cancellation and incorrect re-provision of BT Business broadband.  
    BT have a separate forum for business customers that you have been directed to previously https://business.forums.bt.com/ and the moderators there will be able to help with complaints with business services and packages.
    If I have got it wrong and you did have a residential service with BT please use the contact the mods link in my forum profile to send over your details. You'll find the link by clicking on my username.
    Thanks
    Neil
    BTCare Community Mod
    If we have asked you to email us with your details, please make sure you are logged in to the forum, otherwise you will not be able to see our ‘Contact Us’ link within our profiles.
    We are sorry but we are unable to deal with service/account queries via the private message(PM) function so please don't PM your account info, we need to deal with this via our email account :-)
    If someone answers your question correctly please let other members know by clicking on ’Mark as Accepted Solution’.

  • Part payment in vendor

    Hello team,
    I have problem with my client,the requirement is:
    vendor wants part payments also to be shown against the full value of particular bill(s) any excess amount not to be shown as part payment of a bill in particular money receipt.
    Can u please advise me how solve this issue.
    Regards,
    Anantha.

    Hi,
    As per your requirement discuss with the abaper, they will create a scrip form for that reuirement.
    Regards

  • Query mode in forms

    Hi, (anyone please help me out)
    I have two blocks namely recmast and recdet blocks. Recmast block deals with mater table for customer receipts and recdet block deals with corresponding invoices that are applied against the money receipt for a customer.
    I did the following steps and was facing problem.
    1. created master block for receipt master table (MRNO, MRDT,MRVAL,CCODE,STATUS) these are fields.
    2. Created detail block for receipt details (mrno, invno, invamt) these are fields in the database table. But in the block I have some non data base fields also.
    3. When I select the customer in the master block all the unpaid invoices are listed in the deails block (invno, invdt, invamt, balamt, amtpaid col with initial value as zero).
    4. As and when I select the invoices using check bok the money receipt value is getting adjusted and we can do so as long as the balance available reaches zero amount.
    5. When I save, I should save the master block fields (database fields) which I working fine.
    6. While saving I want to save only invoices which are adjusted against the receipt and not unchecked invoices.
    Here both are database block only. I have achieved it using database block for master table and content block for details table. While saving I am able to achieve my target. But I am facing a problem while querying. When I query the record I should view both master details and corresponding invoices which are originally adjusted against the receipt. This I am simulating from oracle apps (here invoices are separately shown when we click the "application" button only).
    Please help me out.
    Regards,
    Chandra sekar
    Message was edited by:
    user519600

    Hi,
    what I have understand from your question is you want to save only those record which are being updated by user, for that you can either user "update changed columns only" option of the block, or you can have an "Pre insert" trigger in which you can write you saving logic and that will override forms default saving logic,
    and other thing is if you dont have detail block as database block you cannt query it by the default way, then you can populate it by manual coding i.e. make a cursor and populate it.
    www.startwithoracle.com

Maybe you are looking for