MPLS - unknown metric on routes found on BGP table

Hi All,
Wondering what are below highlighted value as they are used for route preferences.
pe401c6506#sh ip bgp vpnv4 vrf DATA 10.18.0.0/16
BGP routing table entry for 10.254.0.253:120:10.18.0.0/16, version 157413
Paths: (2 available, best #2, table DATA)
Advertised to update-groups:
     1          2          3          4          5          6          7
     8          10         11         12         13         14         15
     53
Local, (aggregated by 65001 10.254.4.254), (Received from a RR-client), imported path from 10.254.4.254:120:10.18.0.0/16
    10.254.4.254 (metric 3) from 10.254.4.254 (10.254.4.254)
      Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, weight 300, valid, internal, atomic-aggregate
      Extended Community: RT:65001:120
Local, (aggregated by 65001 10.254.4.253), (Received from a RR-client), imported path from 10.254.4.253:120:10.18.0.0/16
    10.254.4.253 (metric 2) from 10.254.4.253 (10.254.4.253)
      Origin IGP, metric 0, localpref 100, weight 300, valid, internal, atomic-aggregate, best
      Extended Community: RT:65001:120
*Note - Are red highlighted some sort of different metric from the BGP MED metric?
Regards,
Hin

Hi Hin
The Red Highlighted Metrics are the IGP Metrics to reach the MP-iBGP Peer which is the 8th Criterion for Best Path Selection Algo..
If we will check for a show ip route 10.254.4.254/253 we will see the IGP metric as to be as the one highlighted in red above.
Hope this helps to answer your query..
Regards
Varma

Similar Messages

Macs show up as "unknown" on my router's DHCP Client Table

Both of my Macs, an Intel Mac Mini running Snow Leopard and a G4 iMac running Tiger show up as "unknown" in my router's DHCP client table.
All of my Windows PCs all show up with their computer names.
Is there a way to get my Macs' computer names to show up in the DHCP client table? The router is a Linksys RTP300.

Open Network System Preferences, click on the service you are using to connect to the network (airport, ethernet, etc), click on Advanced and go to the TCP/IP tab. There is a field for DHCP client ID. This may pass a name to the router and it may use it. I don't know.
Another option is the WINS tab. You can set the Netbios name (other than the default) and workgroup (and any WINS servers, if you know their addresses).

Redundant access from MPLS VPN to global routing table

Several our customers have MPLS VPNs deployed over our infrastructure. Part of them requires access to Internet (global routing table in our case).
As I'm not aware of any methods how to dynamicaly import/export routes between VRF/Global routing tables, at the moment there are static routes configured - one inside VRF pointing to global next hop, another one in global routing table, pointing to interface inside VRF.
Task is to configure redundant access to Internet. By redundancy I mean using several exit points (primary and backup), what physically represents separate boxes.
Here comes tricky part - both global static routes (on both boxes, meaning) are valid and reachable in all cases - no matter if specific prefix is reachable in VRF or not. What I'd like to achieve is that specific static route becomes valid only if specific prefix is reachable inside VRF. Yea, sounds like dynamic routing :), I know
OK, hope U got the idea. Any solutions/recommendations ? Running all Internet routing inside VRF isn't an option, at least for now :(

Hi Andris,
I did not mean to have a VRF on the CE. The CE would have both PVCs in the global routing table - his ONLY routing table in fact. One PVC would be used to announce routes into the customer specific VPN (VRF configured on the PE). The other PVC would allow for internet access through the PE (global IP routing table on the PE).
dot1q will be ok as well.
This way the CE can be a normal BGP peer to the PE, i.e. there is no MPLS VPN involved here. This allows all options of customer-ISP connectivity.
Example:
PE config:
interface Serial0/0
encapsulation frame-relay
interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point
description customer VPN access
ip vrf customer
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.252
interface Serial0/0.2 point-to-point
description customer Internet access
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252
router rip
address-family ipv4 vrf customer
version 2
network 10.0.0.0
no auto-summary
redistribute bgp 65000 metric 5
router bgp 65000
neighbor 192.168.1.2 remote-as 65001
address-family ipv4 vrf customer
redistribute rip
CE config:
interface Serial0/0
encapsulation frame-relay
interface Serial0.1 point-to-point
description VPN access
ip address 10.1.1.2 255.255.255.252
interface Serial0.2 point-to-point
description Internet access
ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.252
router bgp 65001
neighbor 192.168.1.1 remote-as 65000
router rip
version 2
network 10.0.0.0
no auto-summary
Of course you can replace RIP with whatever is suitable for you. And don´t sue me when you do not apply required BGP filters for internet access... ;-)
The other option ("mini internet") would be feasible as well. Just make sure your BGP filters are NEVER messed up and additionally apply a limit on the numbers of prefixes in your VRF mini-internet.
Regards
Martin

Difference between sh ip bgp & sh ip route? BGP tables and main routing table.

Difference between sh ip bgp & sh ip route?
sh ip bgp :::: loc-rib ?
sh ip bgp nei x.x.x.x advertised-routes : adj-rib-in.
sh ip bgp nei x.x.x.x recieved-routes : adj-rib-out.
sh ip bgp nei x.x.x.x routes : loc-rib ?
sh ip route = rib ? if yes does it mean its loc-rib ?
so in a given router with bgp running, will there be 5 tables (sh ip bgp; adj-rib-in; loc-rib;adj-rib-out; sh ip route) ? if yes where are they saved ?

sh ip bgp
shows the BGP table (where are stored info coming from BGP update)
sh ip bgp nei x.x.x.x advertised-routes
shows networks that your router will advertise to a specific neighbor
sh ip bgp nei x.x.x.x recieved-routes
shows advertisement received from a specific neighbor; networks (NLRI) filtered with route-map distribute-list,... are included (Inbound soft reconfiguration must be enabled)
sh ip bgp nei x.x.x.x routes
shows only routes sent by a specific neighbor and not filtered or discarded (i.s accepted)
sh ip route
show routing table; it contains the best route for each network (best is first of all the lowest administrative distance, then the lowest metric)
Bye,
enrico.
PS please rate if useful

Unknown structure 'ns0:MT_dbglgtr_FileName' found in document'

I have other problem.
The receiver channel communication gives the next error:
Exception in XML Parser (format problem?):'java.lang.Exception: Message processing failed in XML parser: 'Conversion configuration error: Unknown structure 'ns0:MT_dbglgtr_FileName' found in document', probably configuration error in file adapter (XML parser error)'.
I haven't empty node and any condition.
Thank you.

Hi,
Same problem solved here: (infact many threads with the same problem and solution)
Error in Receiver FCC: Unknown structure ... found in document
Re: Receiver File content conversion - NO Output
Regards,
Abhishek.
Edited by: abhishek salvi on Apr 14, 2009 7:42 PM

BPM error : Message pipeline PE_ADAPTER unknown XML message not found. Help

Hello All,
I have done 3 steps in BPM
RFC --- BPM --- RFC
RECEIVE step ==> Opens SYNCH ASYNCH bridge and receives RFC request message
SEND synchronous ==> to send RFC request and get the RFC response.
SEND ==> Closes SYNCH ASYNCH bridge and Send's response back to the RFC.
In my last send step (response back) I am getting message
"Message pipeline PE_ADAPTER unknown XML message not found" .
Pls help

Hi Rick,
check out this SAP Note: 1087532
Regards
Dominic

No channel for backwards routing found

Hello SDN Users,
The message on my scenario sent correctly to receiver System however the "Acknowledgement no possible" icon is shown in the SXMB_MONI. (I have used Quality of service as EO, no BPM and ACK_SYSTEM_FAILURE=0)
Here more informations about this issue:
<SAP:Code area="OUTBINDING">CO_TXT_ROUTING_BACK_ERROR</SAP:Code>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL_BACK</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = XXX</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 001</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = D</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = PIAFUSER</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2007-11-20T09:42:09Z CET</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
-->
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL_BACK</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL_BACK</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_ROUTING_BACK-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">no channel for backwards routing found</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
<Trace level="1" type="System_Error">Error exception return from pipeline processing!</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
Any suggestions how to solve this?

hi,
Can you check in confiuration of Communucation Channels , that you have checked the option of Acknoeledgement , if did it so uncheck it, may be this is the problem.
hope this will help
regards
HONEY

Assistance Needed: Inter-VRF Routing with MP-BGP

hello everyone,
I've been trying to solve a problem for over a day regarding inter-vrf routing using MP-BGP and I can't seem to figure a few things out.
I have Cisco 1921 which has VRF-JLAN and VRF-JGLOBE with 3 interfaces configured as (g0/0 = vrf JLAN, g0/1=no vrf, g0/2 = dot1q trunk to 2960S). vrf JLAN is a restricted network for users access, dns server, e.t.c. vrf JGLOBE is for Video server and global routing table belongs to Wifi Access. I've been able to seperate all the network and I can route traffic out to the Internet from vrf JLAN and the global route table but where I'm having issues is getting vrf JGLOBE to route traffic using the Global route table.
For example: vrf JLAN should not be accessed by either Global or vrf JGLOBE. JGLOBE should be able to access vrf JLAN dns server but it should route its internet traffic via Global route table (g0/1). Last JLAN should be able to access 2 networks from the Global route table.
I've attached my config and diagram so you can better understand what I'm trying to achieve. More light to solving this problem would be much appreciated.
ip vrf JGLOBE
rd 65001:2
export map WIFI
route-target export 65001:2
ip vrf JLAN
rd 65001:1
import ipv4 unicast map C-GLOBAL
route-target export 65001:1
route-target import 65001:1
route-target import 65001:2
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
description LAN-ACCESS-INTERNET [TO Nexthop FIREWALL]
ip vrf forwarding JLAN
ip address 192.168.4.3 255.255.255.248
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip flow ingress
ip flow egress
ip inspect INTERNET-FW out
ip virtual-reassembly in
load-interval 30
duplex auto
speed auto
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description GLOBAL-Wifi-INTERNET [TO Nexthop - FIREWALL]
ip address 192.168.5.3 255.255.255.248
no ip redirects
no ip unreachables
no ip proxy-arp
ip flow ingress
ip flow egress
ip inspect GLOBAL-FW in
ip inspect GLOBAL-FW out
ip virtual-reassembly in
load-interval 30
duplex auto
speed auto
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
interface GigabitEthernet0/2.3
description Users LAN
encapsulation dot1Q 3
ip vrf forwarding JLAN
ip address 192.168.30.1 255.255.255.240
interface GigabitEthernet0/2.4
description Video Server
encapsulation dot1Q 4
ip vrf forwarding JGLOBE
ip address 10.6.40.1 255.255.255.0
router ospf 1 vrf JLAN
router-id 10.6.6.10
redistribute bgp 65001 subnets
network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 0
router ospf 2 vrf JGLOBE
router-id 10.5.7.10
redistribute bgp 65001 subnets
network 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 area 0
router bgp 65001
bgp router-id 10.4.6.4
bgp log-neighbor-changes
bgp graceful-restart restart-time 120
bgp graceful-restart stalepath-time 360
bgp graceful-restart
address-family ipv4
redistribute connected
exit-address-family
address-family ipv4 vrf JGLOBE
redistribute connected
redistribute ospf 2
exit-address-family
address-family ipv4 vrf JLAN
redistribute connected
redistribute ospf 1
exit-address-family
ip dns view vrf JGLOBE default
ip dns view vrf JLAN default
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.5.1
ip route vrf JGLOBE 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 GigabitEthernet0/1 192.168.5.1
ip route vrf JLAN 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.4.1 name LAN_INET
ip prefix-list GLOBAL-INET seq 5 permit 0.0.0.0/0
ip prefix-list SERVER-NET seq 5 permit 10.6.40.2/32
ip prefix-list WIFI-NET seq 5 permit 10.254.0.0/22 le 32

Hi Matt
Yes the X/32 routes needs to be present in the VRF Routing-Table and if they are to be learnt statically then the MP-iBGP config for that particular VRF address-family has to redistribute static routes as well.
Regards
Varma

T-code CO01 to create Production order:error message "No routing found"?

I use t-code CO01 to create Production order.At the first screen I select material 72 and plant HJW1 .At the Header creen,I input the data in the General tab and press return but the sap show the error message "No routing found".But I have create the routing for the material 72 and plant HJW1.I don't know why the sap found no routing.So my question was how to found the reason about why the sap can not found the routing and how to resolve this problem.Thank you.

Hi,
Probably you would have created the routing today, with valid from todays date. But the order you are creating may be with start date in past and system is not able to find and valid routing for the day.
I would suggest you to remove both the Basic "Start" and "End" and change the scheduling type to "Current date Scheduling", now enter. If system still not finding the routing, use the function "Read PP Master data".
Regards,
Prasobh

CRS, IOS-XR: local IGP route not installed in BGP table when learned from RR

Hello,
We use CRS routers in our IGP/BGP network core, some of which are acting as BGP originators and reflectors (RRs) for IPv4 unicast. We also use CRS routers as Internet PEs. The problem we have is between those PEs and the core routers.
Premise: each Internet PE is terminating customer cisrcuits and injects those downstream routes in IGP (via redistributing static, or just learned via IGP from a downstream router). The core (P) routers then learn those routes from the PE via the IGP. Two of the P-routers act as BGP originators and install the necessary routes in BGP using the network statement. These routes are mostly supernets (i.e. summarized), but some coincide with IGP routes, as learned from the PEs. The P-routers acting as RRs then reflect all iBGP routes to all IPv4 unicast BGP speakers in the network, including the Internet PEs (we also have BGP peers on those PEs, which is why this is necessary).
Problem: if a specific downstream route, learned on an Internet PE via IGP (i.e. from downstream), is then received by that PE from an RR via iBGP (i.e. from upstream), the route is not installed in the BGP table (the output of the show bgp x.x.x.x/xx command is: Network not in table)
Question: does anyone know why this is happening? This is concictent on all of our CRS PEs. As far as I am aware there is no BGP rule that would explain this behavior. We don't expect the PE to prefer the iBGP route over the IGP route, but that should not prevent it from learning it and installing it in the BGP table... The only discrepancy I could think of is that the IGP route has a next-hop pointing downstream, whereas the the same route, learned over iBGP has a next-hop pointing upstream. Then again,this shouldn't prevent the route to appear in the BGP table....
Your help would be appreciated!
Thanks!

Hi !
If I am understandung you correctly then Split Horizon is the keyword
Because if the route is learned from downstream BGP drops any same path information learned from upstream
SPLIT-HORIZON only applies to distance-vector routing protocols. In case of BGP, it simply means that a prefix learned via a peer is not advertised back to that peer.
Split horizon will simply block out routes with the same neighbor as the next-hop for the router
regards
alexander

MPLS support for 2621XM Router

Hi ,
Can anyone suggest me the IOS for 2621XM Router to support the MPLS LDP.
My router is a Provider edge router.
My flash is only 32 MB .
Thanx in advance
yogesh

Hi
You should use : C2600-spservicesk9-mz
This IOS is SP Services IOS for 2600 & 2600XM series router which support MPLS .
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps8802/ps5460/prod_bulletin09186a00801af451.html
Regards
Chetan Kumar
http://chetanress.blogspot.com

Does a Router support 2 BGP As in one router

Does a Router support 2 BGP As in one router. I have gone through the below Cisco page, however my router is not allowing to enter the second AS in the router, it is giving the error as usual " BGP is already running; AS is XX" .
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/12_2s/feature/guide/fsbgpdas.html#wp1056689
My Router :- Cisco 3845
IOS Version :- c3845-advipservicesk9-mz.124-24.T8.bin

Hi,
You can not run multiple BGP processes on a single router with each of them being in a separate AS. What you can do, and the link in your post explains that, is that towards a particular eBGP neighbor, you can use the neighbor local-as command to appear to be in a different AS than the one you really are in. So you do not start two BGP processes, you just make your single BGP process to appear to use a different ASN on a particular eBGP peering.
Best regards,
Peter

BGP Table Version - erratum

There appears to be a error this tech-note:
BGP Table Version
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/116511-technote-tableversion-00.html
Document ID: 116511
The Peer Table Version is used in order to track which peers must be informed of which prefixes for which there were changes in the best path. The Peer Table Version of each peer is checked against the Prefix Table Version of the prefixes. If the Prefix Table Version of a prefix is lower than the Peer Table Version, then BGP must send an update for that prefix to that BGP peer. For example, if the peer 10.1.1.2 has a Peer Table Version of 60, then that peer is up to date for all prefixes with Prefix Table Version of 60 and lower. The router must send a BGP update for all prefixes with a Prefix Table Version that is higher than 60.

Hi Ivan,
The bgp table version number is a Cisco software (ios/iox) specific implementation. It's not part of the RFC. Therefore it cannot be retrieved via snmp.
Best regards,
Shane

WS-SUP720-3B full BGP table

Hi all,
I have a Catalyst 6500 with SUP720-3B whith 1GB memory (MEM-Sup720-SP-1GB= and MEM-MSFC3-1GB=) which is going to receive full BGP table, I know about the limitation of 256K routes of SUP720-3B, but with the following memory will it be able to hande the full BGP table?
Thnx in advance,

Disclaimer
The Author of this posting offers the information contained within this posting without consideration and with the reader's understanding that there's no implied or expressed suitability or fitness for any purpose. Information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as rendering professional advice of any kind. Usage of this posting's information is solely at reader's own risk.
Liability Disclaimer
In no event shall Author be liable for any damages whatsoever (including, without limitation, damages for loss of use, data or profit) arising out of the use or inability to use the posting's information even if Author has been advised of the possibility of such damage.
Posting
I don't believe so. For full Internet routes, you'll want a XL variant.

No segment found in Metadata table

Hi,
We are posting an Idoc from an external application to R/3 using C RFC libraries. There was a new custom segment Z1xxx added to an Extension message type Zxxxx on SAP. There is an error in the external application while trying to build/Map the Idoc segments before sending the idoc to R/3.
The error says "No such segment type found in metadata table". The segments heirarchy is the same as defined on SAP.
The release have been checked for this new segment, its released to 45B as similar to other standard segments.
Please let us for any resolution for successful posting of an Idoc with the custom Z1 segment.
Thanks,
Prabhu
Message was edited by: Prabhu Kudlapura

Hi Suhas,
Thanks for your quick response.
Yes I have run SE14 and activate & adjust the database, But problem is same.
My select query is:
SELECT VBELN
 PI
 GJAHR
 KUNNR
 GPD
 GPI
INTO TABLE I_GP_DATA
FROM ZFI_GP_DISCOUNTS
WHERE AUGDT BETWEEN ZFI_GP_DISCOUNTS-AUGDT AND ZFI_GP_DISCOUNTS-P_DATE
AND DOC_NO EQ SPACE.
Thanks & Regards,
Hemant Maurya

MPLS - unknown metric on routes found on BGP table

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for