MR11 not picking PO for clearing

Hi,
We are unable to clear one item of a PO through MR11. Even though the PO has GR surplus, system is not picking for clearing.
Below are the transactions done on the PO.
Credit memo cerated on: 13.04.2009
MIGO created on:             24.04.2009
MIRO created on:             24.04.2009
In above case Credit memo is done prior to Invoice and GR. I want to know what could be the reason of MR11 not clearing the PO.
Thanks.

Ｈｉ,
    Please check balance of Gr/IR account  by TRC: MB5S .
   If balance is zero,  yo do not need TRC: MR11.
Regards,
   Gaito

Similar Messages

  • GL account has not been assigned for CLEAR in customization

    Dear Guru's,
    When i enter into the Transaction code J2IUN, system is giving following error message-
    "GL account has not been assigned for CLEAR in customization"
    If it could have been Excise or AED or BED etc. then i could have assigned the GL to these in account determination -> Assign Gl account
    But i m not able to understand this CLEAR account.
    Please guide me to resolve this problem.
    Regards,
    Devanshu Gaur

    Chek if the GL Accounts are open item managed? Ideally all tax accounts should be open item line item managed
    Regards
    Sanil

  • Error - GL account has not been assigned for CLEAR in customization

    Hi
    We are working on ECC 6.0.
    When we try to create Excise Invoice through J1IS for Ref doc Type MATD for Material Doc of 122 Movement Type we are getting the following error -  "GL account has not been assigned for CLEAR in customisation"
    Can anyone help that for which Excise Transaction Type (ETT), the GL account has to be assigned under GL Accounts per Excise Transaction.
    Regards
    Kapil

    Hi,
    Maintain the ETT for CIEV - CANCELLATION OF EXCISE INVOICE in following customizing
    IMG > Logistics - General > Tax on Goods Movements > India > Account Determination > Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction
    Regards,
    Jigar

  • Excise duty is not picking up for a business area

    Hi,
    please help me  ,The problem is
    while creating invoice it is found that exice duty is not picked up by the system for that invoice for a particular business area , so please suggest what setting has to be checked to rectify the error.Is
    Thanks
    Ahsan

    Excise Duty will flow based on your plant and CIN settings and not based on your business area.  So first check in your sale order / billing document whether plant is flowing.
    If you are in TAXINJ, ensure that you have maintained both the customer code and material code in J1ID.  If you are in TAXINN, ensure that the relevant tax code with that ED condition type is maintained in FV11
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Report not picking value for segment reporting

    Hello,
    The PA report is not picking up the carry forward value. I have checked the following.
    1)in FS10N  balance carry fwd has been done.
    2)2keh Profit center carry fwd actual balance has been performed
    3)KE5Z Chk a/c wise transaction, it is showing that PA documents exist
    The program was developend last year December and it had picked the correct value for the same (cumulative value).
    Kindly let me know what could be the possible reason. Any pointer for the same will be highly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards
    Jyoti

    self answerd

  • G/L account not picking automatically for cost centre

    Hai
    When ever i create a P.O for a cost centre ,when i enter the cost centre, the system is not picking the G/L account automatically. Instead i need to enter the G/L account manually.Why it is behaing like this? what is the solution?
    I had checked all the setting as mentioned below
    1.OBYC->   Here maintained the  G/L account for the comibination of
    Valuation mod - Gereral Modi- Valuation class- debit g/l account - credit  g/l account
    2.OKB9 -> Maintained entries for  Co.code- Cost element - Cost center
    3.OME9- Account Modification is VBR
    4.OBY6- Checked the field status variant, posting period variant

    Hi,
    Once u have given account assignment category 'K', then system will pick automatically G/L account from the OBYC settings for the combination of Valuation modification code,  account modifier (VBR) & Valuation class.
    From the OME9 transcation, system will pick transcation key for the respective account assignment category.
    For the  account assignment category 'K', account modifier is 'VBR'.
    Here masterial master record (MMR) is optional. If you are giving MMR in the PO, system will pick valuation class from the MMR.
    If MMR is not giving, then system will pick valuation class from the transcation OMQW. Here you need to maintain valuation class aganist material group, which is u r giving in the PO. ( This is optional)
    In the OBYC transcation, for the transcation key  GBB you need to maintain G/L account for the combination Valuation modification code,  account modifier (VBR) & Valuation class.
    Also maintain one more entry in the transcation key  GBB,  maintain G/L account for the combination Valuation modification code,  account modifier (VBR) & Valuation class field is blank.
    Once you have given account assignment category 'K' in the PO, system will pick G/L for the combination Valuation modification code,  account modifier (VBR) & Valuation class. This is happening before giving the cost centre.
    If you are not maintaining MMR in the PO and not maintaining valuation class aganist material group in the transcation OMQW, the system will pick G/L account for the combination of Valuation modification code,  account modifier (VBR) & Valuation class field is blank.
    So in your case, check valuation class aganist material group in the transcation OMQW and maintain G/L in the OBYC for the respective combination. If valuation class is not maintained aganist material group in the transcation OMQW and maintain one more entry in the OBYC with the blank valuation calss field.
    Regards
    KRK

  • With holding line items are not picking up while clearing with F-44 (DP)

    Hi Friends,
    I hope you resolve my problem.
    I have a problem with With holding tax line items. Please see below for more details.
    1. Made advance payment to Vendors through F-48
    Vendor a/c dr 200,000
        To Bank a/c 196000
        To TDS a/c      4000
    2. Raised Vendor invoice through F-43
    Expence a/c dr    50000
        To Vendor a/c    49000
        To TDS Payable   1000
    3. Cleared Vendor invoice against the Down payment
    39A Vendor a/c dr 50000
    26 Vendor a/c 49000
    40 TDS Payable 1000
    While i am tryi ng to do the above invoice with WHT clearing, the system is saying that " With holding tax information is ignored"
    The entry while clearing Vendor DP is
    37 Vendor   a/c  dr 49000
    27  Vendor a/c   49000
    I have every seeting in the system
    1. Tax types, codes, Vendor master, FSG, FBKP, and posting key settings. All are looking fine
    Please help me how to clear the WHT automatically without manual intervention.
    Kindly correct me where ever u see mistakes
    Thank you so much for your advance help
    Regards,
    Narasim

    Hello Ray,
    I am very happy that some have taken tthe responsilibility of answering my query.
    When i do the F-54, I am able to clear the vendor invoice against with the down payment. But if i go and see the WHT in respective GL account, they are still showing as " Open".
    Please help me how to resolve it.
    If this is not the correct way, kindly suggest me the right way.
    Thanks for all your help
    Regards,
    Narasim

  • Invoices not showing up for clearing with F-32

    Hi,
    For 2 customer accounts we have similar issues.
    Customer 1:
    FBL5N: 1 invoice and 1 payment received which perfectly match.
    F-32: only the payment is displayed, no trace of the invoice, unable to clear
    Customer 2:
    FBL5N: 4 invoices and 1 payment received which perfectly match.
    F-32: only the last 3 invoices and the payment are shown, no trace of the first invoice, unable to clear
    We have checked on the customer master data (company code), but couldn't find any differences with the customers for which clearing is working fine.
    Also checked the setup of the related provisioning accounts and they are set to Open Item Management.
    Could you please help us out or indicate what more we need to check?
    Thanks in advance!
    Best regards,
    Geert

    Hi Greet,
    It is clear from your message that the issue is due to base line date changes.
    The first thing is that I don't understand why base line dates were changed that many times. Even after receipt of the payment also dates were changed........just imagine the need for change.
    Then coming to the issue for customer 2 it is clear that the base line date:31/12/2009 is in future date, hence it won't appear in open item process.
    But in the first case on 29.09.2009: Baseline date from 17.03.2009 to 31.12.2009 then on
    28.10.2009: Baseline date from 31.12.2009 to 31.12.2008 were changed. In this case check in the accounting document and see which base line date is appearing. If the date is 31/12/2009, then it wont appear in f-32.
    If the doc date baseline date appears as 31/12/2008........we need to analyze further.
    Hope this will clarify you clearly.
    Regards,
    Dharani

  • Business area not picking up for substitution...

    Hi
    I have created susbstitution for GL account..for substituting business area for GL account....(tax GL account
    Tax line item is automatically created in document.....i want business area to be pickep up for the same.
    We want substitution create for Business area updating ;- When Document has 4 line item at the time of TAX and TDS line item the Business area not update, MIRO Document also not update the Business area.
    Please reply
    thanks

    Dear Vijay,
    Please kindly read the SAP note number 199886     Business area in tax line
    In the value-added tax line items, the field "Business area" is NEITHER
    automatically filled NOR can you enter a value manually.
    Postings to VAT accounts must be made WITHOUT business area. The reason
    for this is that the field "Business area" does NOT exist in the tax
    data. Therefore,the advance return for tax on sales/purchases can also
    only generate postings WITHOUT business area and these postings must
    correspond exactly to the original tax postings in your account
    assignments. Otherwise, the tax accounts would have steadily increasing
    business area balances.
    Unfortunately I must inform you that the business area is not available
    for substitution because it can cause inconsistences in AM,CO and MM
    modules.
    Substituting the B.A.field is a modification to the standard SAP
    system. To make the business area field substitutable you must have
    written an ABAP to update table GB01 for the GSBER field, this is
    all explained in SAP note 42615.
    I hope this helps.
    Mauri

  • Add. Excise duty not picking up for capital items - Country India version

    Hi
    While capturing duty using T.code J1IEX for Imported capital items Additional Excise duty is not getting captured properly. 50% should have been captured fot the current year and the balance carried forward to the next year.
    Help reqd.

    Hi,
    Have u defined AT2 in Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction and CENVAT on hold under CAPE transaction type. Have u defined G/L account for these under Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction.
    whether material in question has been defined as Asset type in J1ID. check all these configuration.
    Regards,
    Venkatesh

  • Net Value in Sales order is not picking up for manual conditions.

    Dear Gurus,
    I created a new pricing procedure for a sales document, where 2 manual conditions will given in sales order.
    But after giving manual conditions, the system is only taking one condition value as net value.
    I given Base value description and the step numbers of two manual conditions for Addition.
    Please help me I want total of two manual conditions into Net value.

    Hi Mahendar ,
    Could you please share the solution if your issue has been resolved . Even we are facing the same issue . It would be of a great help
    thanks and regards
    Kish

  • Automatic Payment program not picking vendors

    Hi
    On Monday,user run F110, some vendors are not picked up for payment. When I've checked this vendor master data payment terms 60 days (Net due date from Doc.date) is mentioned. These vendors fall in to due next 06/22/2008.But they are in open items only. The payment method is assigned correctly, no changes were done for past 3/4 months.
    My doubt is Why these are not picked for payment when they are in Open Item in this payment run ?
    Can any one tell me when will these vendors can be picked up for payment ? Do they complete the total period as per payment terms assignement ?
    Regards
    Madan

    Hi
    I've checked the next p/date, it is 06/19/2008 which is less than due date (06/22/2008).
    Is it the reason for not picking ? If I want this vendor to be picked up for payment, Shall I run this once again by giving more than due date like 06/24/2008 ?
    I've checked other vendors also, they fall under due date and got picked up.
    I appreciate your kind response and will award you the points soon..
    Regards
    Madan

  • Delivery not picked in Wave in T code VL35

    Hi Friends,
    I have created delivery for 201 Movement (Issue to Cost Centre)and with HODN-Item Category. This is not picked up for Wave in VL35 T Code.
    Please let me know if there is any SPRO setting missed out.
    Is there any Upgrade related issue. (ECC 6 from ECC 5.0)
    Please guide.
    Thanks and regards,
    Sharabh

    I think HOD delivery type is for handling units, which may not be picked using VL35.
    Regards,
    Aroop

  • STO not picked up in delivery VL10B

    Hi,
    I have created a Intercompany PO for which the shipping data was created correctly. But when i try to do a delivery using VL10B , the document is not picked up for delivery.
    The problem is coming for the new document type which was created few days ago , there is no issue if i use the old document type. I remember somewhere we need to maintain the document type in delivery copy control , but could not recollect where exactly it is.
    I checked with all the necessary configs , but could not get a break through. Any help would be highly appreciated.
    Regards

    J Sudhakar wrote:
    > I have created a Intercompany PO for which the shipping data was created correctly. But when i try to do a delivery using VL10B , the document is not picked up for delivery.
    Dear,
    When you use VL10B and execute and then you tried to create delivery in background which failed.
    Now get the LOG of delivery creation you will get the error message post that message (As when ever system fails to create a delivery it generates a Log stating the reason of failure)
    To get the Log -> Use Log for delivery creation (Shift +F4) from the VL10B output screen ->Then from here use (Shift +F8) (Notes) to get the log
    Edited by: redriver on Feb 8, 2012 4:43 AM

  • GL account has not been assigned for the excise a/c in customization

    HI ,
    When i try to post MIGO for PO i am getting the following error message .Please help me to solve this issue
    GL account has not been assigned for CLEAR in customization
    Message no. 8I447
    Diagnosis
    GL account has not been assigned for the excise a/c in customization
    Procedure
    Assign GL a/c for the excise a/c in CIN customization under : Accounting -> Assign GL accounts to excise groups and transaction types
    Thanks & Regards,
    Senthil

    HI
    I have maintained as you mentioned but i am getting the same error message.
    Here i am using INT Charts of account and also i have one question when determining account for Excise whether we have to maintain CAIN charts of account please clarify me on this issue
    Give me a good solution for the above issue
    Thanks & Regards,
    Senthil.

Maybe you are looking for