MRRL MRDC Automatic settlement of delivery costs

I have a question regarding ERS and fixed delivery costs.
We want to use ERS for a service with orderquantity independent costs and order quantity dependent costs. The purchase order is created based on an external operation from a production order. Initially the purchase order is created for the planned quantity of the production order.
Realized quantities can and will deviate from the planned quantities. The realized quantities are posted to both production order and purchase order.
Eg.:
Production order for 10 PC --> purchase order for service of 10 PC.
Cost of service is 0,1 per PC + 5 Eur per order--> for this order this means 0,1*10 + 5 = 6 Eur
Now 15 PC have been realized and posted GR for the purchase order.
Using ERS with MRRL with option Settle goods items and delivery costs has following results:
15 * 0,10 --> 1,5
15 * 0,5 --> 7,5
I expect the system to post 1,5 + 5 Eur.
Is that possible? How can I realize that?
thanks for any help
Jean

no, SAP does not know this kind of fixed conditions.
even a fixed condition is depended on the quantity, and adjusted to the GR quantity if it differs from PO quantity.

Similar Messages

Automatic settlement of delivery costs MRDC for service PO

Hi,
We configured a custom condition type ZCOM (Commission). This condition was assigned to pricing procedure RM0000. This condition is defined as a delivery cost condition with accrual.
PO for non-inventory material:
- Free text item for 10 EA @ $100/EA
- ZCOM condition added at the item level for 10% ($100). Vendor in this condition is different that PO vendor.
- GR for 1 EA
- PO history shows: GR (101) for 1 EA with total value $100. It also shows DCGR for 1 EA in the delivery cost quantity and value $10.
Run automatic delivery cost settlement (MRDC): It created invoice for the freight vendor using the delivery cost amount of $10. In PO history it shows: DCIn for 1 EA in delivery quantity field and amount of $10.
PO for services:
- Free text service for 10 EA @ $100/EA.
- ZCOM condition added at the item level (not at the service level) for 10% (value $100).
- Service entry sheet for 1 EA with value $100
- PO history shows: SEnt for $100. GR (101) for $100. It also shows DCGR for 1 AU in the delivery cost quantity and amount of $10.
Run automatic delivery cost settlement (MRDC): It created invoice for the freight vendor NOT using the delivery cost amount of $10. It created an invoice for the full line item amount of $100. PO history shows: DCIn for 1 AU in delivery quantity field and amount of $100. This is wrong. It should have created the invoice only for $10.
Any help on what is going on it is greatly appreciated.
Thanks and regards, Jose Oyon.

no, SAP does not know this kind of fixed conditions.
even a fixed condition is depended on the quantity, and adjusted to the GR quantity if it differs from PO quantity.

Delivery Costs using MRRL

Hi All,
I have configured the Vendor/s in the Automatic Settlement for Delivery Costs. All vendors are marked as ERS, transaction code is configured and number range has been created.
I now have the the PO coming up when I run MRDC however I get "Document does not have any items". I have a sneaking feeling that its because the condition is marked as Statistical. Can any one help me with this and advise how I could uncheck the Statistical check on the condition record if this is the case.
Look forward to your responses and advise.

I have a question here . Are you using 2 different vendors one for PO and one for Delivery cost?
Please refer [ERS Settlement|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/20c57f75-d26f-2910-c3aa-dee124530121?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true]
[ERS|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/4019cf83-d650-2c10-e99b-83ae9ee2346e?quicklink=index&overridelayout=true]
Document selection critieria also plays an important role in the intil screen.
Hope it helps
Edited by: Karthik on Aug 11, 2011 10:43 AM

Planned Delivery Cost - MRDC

Hi,
I am trying to settle planned delivery cost maintained in PO through condition type - FRB1.
Also maintained tcode details in table t169f.
Did configuration in node - MM - LIV - ERS - maintained required details for the vendor
I did GR against the PO.
Now I am executing MRDC, nothing happens?
Did I miss any step?
Please revert.
Regards,
Dipak

Hi
check this
add your freight vendor to configuration transaction: Materials Management > Logistics Invoice Verification > ERS > Specify Automatic Settlement for Planned Delivery Costs.
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Planned Delivery Cost Settlement (MDRC)

Hi All,
I tired so many ways to settle planned delivery costs through MDRC since ERS don't settle the delivery costs. I keep getting "No values for this selection" msg. I made sure I fill in the correct information at the intial screen.
What am I doing wrong?
Thanks!

Hi Duke
I still unable to see MDRC tcode anywhere....
i have not understood ur query also, if u want to settle planned delivery cost it will be captured at the time of GR to freight clearing account.
The stock account is debited with the planned delivery costs at goods receipt and the system makes the offsetting posting to a freight clearing account. This posting is then cleared by an offsetting entry to the vendor account at invoice receipt.
Regards
Yogesh

LE-TRA Shipment costs as inbound delivery costs, goods receipt

Hello gurus:
We are facing the following scenario, regarding inbound transportation.
We plan our shipment document and shipment costs, and they feature several items. Each of those items represent a shipping service, which in certain cases be taken on different countries by the same service agent.
That is, we have a service X on country A, with tax indicator 1, and service Y on country B, with tax indicator 2.
Both services would need to be transferred as delivery costs to the purchase order.
According to note 427944, shipment cost value is cumulated by service agent., so that it looks impossible to get the values broken up to the purchase order, which would be the first step to subsequently get the right tax indicators for each item of the shipment.
Even using different condition types on the shipment cost document, system cumulates by service agent and transfers to the first condition found on the purchase order schema.
Has any of you faced similar issue? Any workaround possible?.
Thanks in advance for your valuable help.
David Ramos.
PORCELANOSA MM.
This is the section of note 427944 that indicates the treatment of the shipment costs in the purchase order,
Transfer the shipment costs into the condition types of the purchase order:
The shipment cost value (without tax amounts) is cumulated for all relevant shipment cost documents
for each service agent and transferred to a corresponding condition type of the purchase order item.
Before cumulation, the amounts are first converted into the purchase order currency.
1. A transfer of the values for each condition type (similar to the transfer from a shipment
cost document to the SD billing document) is not supported.
2. If different service agents exist in the shipment cost documents, a corresponding number of
condition lines (with value 0) must be specified in the purchase order item. These can always
belong to the same condition type (in schema 'Manual') or also to different condition types (not
'Manual'):
a) Manual condition lines: If the condition type in the schema of the purchase order is
marked as 'manual', the condition type must be created (with value 0) in the purchase order
item before the goods receipt. If delivery costs are expected from different service agents,
several non-valuated entries must be generated for this condition type. If more condition
lines exist than required, these are then no longer taken into account. If condition lines
are missing, the last service agents are not settled.
- Advantage: You only have to define one condition type for the delivery costs.
- Disadvantage: Each purchase order must be processed manually before the goods receipt.
b) Automatic condition lines: If the condition lines are to be generated automatically for
the delivery costs (the condition type is not flagged as 'Manual' in the schema), the schema
must have enough condition types to settle several service agents. If more condition lines
exist than required, these are then no longer taken into account. If condition lines are
missing, the last service agents are not settled.
- Advantage: The goods receipt can be carried out without manual preparation beforehand in
the purchase order.
- Disadvantage: You must define identical condition types with different names.
Message was edited by: PORCELANOSA MM

Hi,
If you refereed the OSS Note 427944 correctly it explains how the shipment cost can be transferred to delivery cost based on some pre-requisite.
Like the value for PO should be >0
Like the service agent is involved during shipment liability, then there should be cumulative transfer for each value which will update based on shipment cost if PO value is "0".
The shipment cost will be delivered to all delivery items based on weight.
If you want to enhance this then you need to use the enhancement V54KSFRC to update the values as per your requirement.
Rgds,

Unplanned delivery cost picking rounding off value in sap miro

Dear Experts,
I have configured unplanned delivery costs to be posted to separate GL account. I have set the default tax code also. In OBYC i have set the frieght and transportation GL account against UPF transaction key. Now even though the user is not entering any value in unplanned delivery cost field, system is automatically taking the rounding off values(manually entered by user to match the vendor invoice) from MIRO line item and is posting to the freight account.
Query -2 - while reversing the already posted MIRO document in MR8M the rounding of value which has been taken automatically in unplanned delivery cost is showing in the error message as :
"Balance is not equal to zero: 0.35- inr"
please refer below screen shot for the error message
Please suggest.
Regards
Chinmaya

please read my blog it explains how to close a question, just replying "closed" does not do really this job
How to close a discussion and why

Settling delivery costs via ERS

Hi Gurus,
MRRL transaction has a check box stating "Settle Goods Item + Planned Delivery Costs". Even if it is checked, I am finding ERS invoices are NOT being generated for freight costs. For eg, the ERS PO has FRB1 pricing condition. GR of both the material and freight pricing condition is performed. After that , MRRL T.code is executed with "Settle Goods Item + Planned Delivery costs" checked. But, it is found that ERS material invoice is generated, but NOT the freight one. Why "Planned delivery costs" is mentioned then in MRRL T.code?
Thanks,
Kumar

First of all I would like you to check if the all involved vendors have activated automatic settlement of planned delivery cost in
customizing (Table T169DC). The entries in EKRSDC are only create if this this setting is set ON. The path is: SPRO -> Material
Management -> Logistic Invoice Verification -> Evaluated Receipt Settl. -> Specify Automatic Settlement of Planned Delivery Costs.
Hope this helps !
Cheers !

Planned Delivery Costs Posting in MRRL

Hello Experts,
We have ERS active in our system for regular consumprion items. These are the items where the price settled is inclusive of packing anf forwarding charges. There is no issue of LIV for these invoices.
But when in a Purchase order any other charges are loaded such as Packing, Forwarding etc. these charges fall under planned delivery costs in terms of LIV. And these charges are not captured at the time of LIV through ERS.
Does anybody aware of any userexit or SAP note which will help me capturing these charges in ERS as well.
Early response will be appreciated as I want to transfer all plant purchases' invpoice verification on ERS.
Thnaks & Regards,
Rahul Puranik.

As per SAP Standard system, it is not possible to post the planned deliver cost thro' ERS or by MRRL.

Automatic settlement to particular combination of cost centres and gl codes

HI,
A company uses Plant Maintenance for Engineering overhauls. MM is used for Engineering spares only (i.e. not for goods for resale etc).
The requirement is to set up ongoing Plant Maintenance Orders, one for each item of plant (only 600). The plan is just to leave them open, as they are only used at a simple level.
Anyway, for each PM order, the requirement will be to settle automatically, and to a particular GL code and a particular cost centre.
So, for three different works orders:-
Cost Centre -
> 333 334 335
GL code
1234----
>(X)
1235----
>(Y)
1236----
>(Z)
1) What is the best way to achieve this? I am thinking that GL code will be specified by order type (therefore I will need about 10, corresponding to the GL codes) and cost centre will be specified by Work Centre in each order.
2) How do I set up automatic settlement? Can this be at period end only or instantly when good are booked to the order by the stores.

Hi ,
For Plant Maintenance with FICO , you need Settlement rule & settlement profile.　
The settlement rule determines what portions of a sender's costs are to be settled to which receiver(s).
In thesettlement profile you determine to which objects orders of this order type can settle to. You can also assign an order type to a settlement profile at a later date. You can change the settlement profile in the order.
After you create the settlement profile , you need to save the profile to particular order type.
Inside the settlement profile , you will define the control parameter of how is the way to settle included which cost center to post.
For automatic settlement , i think you need user exist - Please refer to userexit IWO10027 or COOM0003 with your abaper.
Thank you.

Automatic Settlement for Prod.orders & Product Cost Collectors.

Dear all,
Please help me how to carryout the Automatic settlement of Production orders &
Product Cost collectors on every month last working day mid night.
Please tell me how to schedule this as an automatic scheduled job.
This program is not been allowed to schedule as a job.
Waiting for your inputs.
Please help me.
Regards
Mangalraj.S

Hi
Create a Variant with the order types need to be setteled at the period and schedule the same in background processing.
Regards
Venkat

Planned delivery cost & sub-sequent settlements

hi ,
what is meant by planned delivery cost ?
what is meant by sub-sequent settlements ?
when they are useful in MM
regards

Hi
<b>Planned delivery costs</b> are the costs agreed with the vendor or goods supplier before the purchase order is created. You enter these as conditions in the purchase order.
Planned delivery costs can be differentiated as follows:
Origin of Costs
Freight charges
Customs charges
Calculation of Costs
Fixed amount, irrespective of delivered quantity
Quantity-dependent amount
<b>Subsequent adjustment</b>
In sub contracting scenario After the subcontractor had delivered the ordered material , you post the goods receipt to the subcontract PO. The system determines the necessary components for each purchase order item and creates for each component a goods issue item with the quantity that was determined in the purchase order
If the vendor informs you after these postings that a greater or smaller quantity of the subcontracting components was actually consumed than planned in the purchase order, you must post a subsequent adjustment to correct the component consumption.
If the component is a by-product, you must post the corrected by-product receipt (excess receipt) or by-product issue (short receipt)
Similary there is a subsequent credit / debit carried out when an additional invoice or credit memo is received for a transaction that has already been invoiced in LIV process
Thanks & regards
Kishore

How to Archive PO for which delivery costs has not been settled ?

Hi dear experts,
For Intra company STO, documents weren't getting archived due to the error message.Scenario is mentioned below.
During pretreatment of MM_EKKO archiving object (TA: SARA), I get an amazing huge amount of PO position which can not be archived due to "*Delivery costs have not been cleared*".
I tried several ways to find out how to solve this issue but without any success.
Point is that we do not clear delivery cost regarding those PO positions.
It means that those PO's won't never be cleared.
Any ideas about how I can fix this issue?
Best regards,
Deepak

Dear Jurgen,
Scenario is as follows:
An Intra company STO is created without delivery costs.
Next step is delivery creation.
Shipment is created with creation of shipment cost document
The shipment costs are distributed accordingly to the items in the PO and they're stamped back in the PO with the condition type ZFRB(copy of FRB1)
This will act as a reference and added to the material cost in the receiving plant.
As the shipment cost document creates a service PO and its cleared with a Invoice being posted in MIRO and subsequently in FI,they aren't clearing the value which is open in the Original stock transport order.
Regards,
Deepak

ERS for Return Items with Planned Delivery Costs also as credit

Hi
I have the requirement to process ERS-Returns (MRRL) where I need to have a credit memo for the product cost and the planned delivery costs incurred with the original order. ($15,000 for product and $1200 for delivery costs = Credit Memo for $16,200) I have tested this extensively but in all situations the planned delivery costs creates an 'invoice' not a credit memo.
Has anybody encountered this requirement? If so, were you able to resolve without implementing an enhancement?
Thanks.

For delivery costs you need to maintain the following customizing:
> OLMR
    > Evaluated Receipt Settlement (ERS)
      > Specify Automatic Settlement of Planned Delivery Costs
The flag controls whether to include or exclude planned delivery costs
from automatic settlement.
Regarding the planned delivery cost, it will not listed in
transaction MRRL. This is the standard SAP design. Instead, please
use transaction MRDC.

ERS and delivery costs

Hi guys,
We have following two problems in case of ERS vendors.
1) We have certain delivery costs also in purchase order. The same vendor will receive material payment and freight related payments. In MRRL transaction, we select "Selected goods items + Planned del costs" and run MRRL. But after this also, amount excluding freight amount is posted in the invoice and delivery cost is not being picked for invoice. How to get material cost + delivery cost also in one invoice
2) In another scenario, we have different freight vendor. For this we are configuring ERS for delivery costs also. But the problem is in configuration we have to mention the vendor code in "Specify Automatic Settlement of Planned Delivery Costs". Can we give vendor code as " * " here? Or is there any other way of doing configuration without mentioning vendor code and it is applicable for all vendors ?
Please suggest the solution for the above two problems.

Hi Pankaj,
Thanks for ur reply. This will work. But my problem is with this, we have to include all the freight vendors in configuration. But we do not know how many vendors are there for the company. If any new vendor is created, who has to enter this in the configuration..
Is there any other way of making this functionality applicable for all vendors.
Other problem is in our PO we have basic rate and 3 to 4 delivery costs,. We have made 103 and then 105 and run ERS run and arranged payment to material vendor (it is same for both material and freight)
But for some reason we are making return delivery against material document with 105 movement. When we run MRRL for this, it will generate credit memo for the quantity returned to vendor. But delivery costs are also added. We want to avoid delivery costs in credit memo and it should only take material cost
How to acheive this? Please help me out

MRRL MRDC Automatic settlement of delivery costs

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for