"Multi-level error propagation carried out" in SCM 5.0

When I use the SNP PPM Generation With Lot Size Margin function in SCM 5.0, I got the following error:
Multi-level error propagation carried out
Message no. /SAPAPO/OM242
Could you please give me this help?
Thanks,
Lian

Hi,
Thank you for the information, but the problem is still there though I de-activated all user-exits...
I also saw the following error:
Invalid planning version
Message no. /SAPAPO/OM015
Thanks,
Lian

Similar Messages

Multi-level error propagation carried out Error in APO

Dear Experts,
We had developed a custom program that is same as /sapapo/rrp3 report, but the issue is when we use planning version other then 000 the custom program is giving the error ""Multi-level error propagation carried out"" but the RRP3 report works fine with all the planning versions.
Please help to find the cause and to solve the issue.
Thanks.
Regards
Abhinav Nallani.

Dear Arek,
The problem is not yet resolved . we have raised an OSS note for the same.
as the relevant notes are already implemented in our case.
regards
Kiran

Error "Multi-level error propagation carried out" when I run a report

Hi All,
When I run the report /SAPAPO/CDPS_REPT - Order and Resource Reporting with the below criteria I getting error "Multi-level error propagation carried out"
Planning Version - Simulation Version XXX
Evaluation Start - 05/03/2011
Evaluation End - 12/31/2013
Evaluation List - Extended Operation List
I do not get error when I run the report with selection as Active version 000 and Evaluation List as Order List, Operation List.
I have tried by ruuning Live cache consistancy check, but the issue is not fixed
Please help me to resolve this issue
Thanks & Regards,
Rajkumar

Hi Jack,
Please do post the server log file here so that we can try and find a solution for the problem you are facing.
I had a problem a while ago with the app server too. While trying to run an application, after a few times, it would give me an error message saying the Application Server cannot be started. I rebooted my machine and thankfully it worked again. Just try this too and see if it works.
If it doesnt we can go through the server log and try to identify the cause of the problem.
Cheers :-)

CIF error-Multi-level error propagation carried out

Dear ALL,
When i am trying activate the integration model for Material transfer it generates queue with status SYSFAIL with message "Multi-level error propagation carried out".
and the integration model is not activated.
please help
regards
Kiran

Dear Arek,
The problem is not yet resolved . we have raised an OSS note for the same.
as the relevant notes are already implemented in our case.
regards
Kiran

Multi-level error propagation during the execution of CFM2 transaction

Hi,
We are implementing SAP SCM 5.0 integrated to SAP R/3 Mills IS.
During the execution of CFM2 transaction, while trying to activate the integration model for the object u201COrdersu201D for the very first time, the following error message appears:
*"Multi-level error propagation carried out".*
There are also messages related to inbound queues blocked. In the case of maintenance orders, CIF_MNT_INBOUND message shows up. While working with Production orders, CIF_ORDER_INBOUND message emerges.
The items listed below should be taken into account:
-The production orders that are meant to be transferred to APO are regular production orders corresponding to several products.
-We are working with configurable materials.
-We are working with the active model (000) and for each plant we are using 2 different planning versions.
Regards,
Analía Nahmías

Dear Analía,
The corresponding error messages issued when executing //CCR indiacted the peg-ids are missing in liveCache.
Recommendations:
-Run transaction /SAPAPO/OM17 to check the internal consistency between database and liveCache within SCM system. Correct the inconsistencies
-Execute report /sapapo/cif_deltareport3 to correct the inconsistencies between ECC and SCM system
Regards,
Tibor

Realignment showing multilevel error propagation carried out and

While executing realignment table it is showing following :-
Realignment showing multilevel error propagation carried out
Realignment of live cache time series aborted
Have seen all consistency checks and everything is fine no alerts received.
Please suggest
vikas

Hi Vikas,
I am assuming that you have maintained the Realignment table properly meaning you have only the necessary entries and removed all unwanted entries. Having assumed that the other reason why this error can come up is when you try to realign more than 1 Characteristic Value in the same table entry.
For Example.
Let us you have 3 Characterstics viz, product, location,customer.
If for Product P1, you are trying to change the location from L1 to L2 and customer from C1 to C2 then there is a possibility such an error might occure.
In such cases we need to create 2 entries as follows
1) P1 L1 C1 to P1 L2 C1
2) P1 L2 C1 to P1 L2 C2.
It is better to avoid Multiple characteristic changes in a single step.
Hope this helps.
Thanks
Mani

SCM Don't consider PrdOrd(R) using Multi-Level/Cover Dependents Req.

Hello all.
My scenary:
Multi-level product with characteristics. Example: Finished
Product>Intermediary 1>Intermediary 2>RAW Material.
In Intermediary2 has a PlOrd(R) scheduled to 28.08.2011.
In Finished Product there is a Sales Order to 07.07.2011.
I ran MRP and DepDMD was created. PlOrd was created too because we using
"Cover Dependent Requirements Immediately".
When SCM reachs Intermediary 2(Where had a PLOrd(R)) he creates another
PlOrd.
All Characteristic is correct(if you compare PlOrd/Planned Order/Sales Order) and if a run MRP only in this level works fine. Only don't work if came from Finished Product to this level.
Until now, i think the problem is with dates. Possibily SCM creates another order if has capacity and the PlOrd(R) is in future.
Anyone has any clue of this issue?
Best Regards.
Marcelo

Hi,
as I can see the ProdOrd is late. so the system will create a new planned order.
You can prevent this by customizing:
Maintain Planning Procedures
Reaction to Events
Action Carried Out by PP When an Event Occurs
Cover dependent/stock transfer requirements immediately with existing receipts
Then the system uses the ProdOrd.
But if there is no receipt for the dependent demand the system will never create a new receipt.
The other option is of course to increase the Alert Threshold for Lateness in the Product Master.
Then the net requirement will find the late production order and does not propose a new order.
When you also want to see the peg in the product view enter the same value for lateness in Maximum Lateness of a Receipt field.
BR Frank
Edited by: Frank Horlacher on Jul 22, 2011 2:09 PM

Characterist Value Propagation on Multi-Level

Hello All.
I need restrict a characteristic propagation on my multi-level scenary.
Anyone knows how do that?
In ECC works fine.
Version:
ECC 6.0
SCM 5.0
Best Regards
Marcelo

More Information..
The hierarchy is:
Finished Product > P1 -> P2 -> P3 - > Raw Material.
There is a PlOrd(R) in P3 material of 4500kg. But This order was created in ECC6. When CIF creates the order, only 2 characteristics values was migrated. This is correct!!!.
Well, when i run MRP all characteristic value from the finished product migrated to lower level. Characteristics like packing.
The dependent demand of lower lever have 4 characteristics from Finished Product.
SCM see the PlOrd(R), but because this order has only 2 characteristics and depend demand has 4. SCM creates another PlOrder ie Surplus.
This is why i need to restrict the propagation of the characteristics.
Thank you and best regards.
Edited by: Marcelo Kayro Quintão on Mar 11, 2011 12:49 PM

Error while processing sales order as new pricing carried out.

"new pricing procedure carried out".iam getting this error while processing the sales order.

Hi Gopal,
This message will come generally when we changed the fright relevant data or any other data system will display this message.
Ram

The error showing as Fiscal year change has not carried out for the coCd

Hi all,
I am facing a very critical situation. My client has the last closed fiscal year as 2006(from 2006 april to 2007 march).For the fiscal yr. 2007(2007april to 2008 march) they have already finalised and submitted the reports made from some parallel software.They now want to tally this report with SAP system and to adjust the SAP system entries as per this report.This work was running fine.But on 01.04.2009 none of the asset reports are running.The error it's throwing is as-
Fiscal year change not yet made for company code PWAL
Message no. AB059
Diagnosis
You have not yet carried out a fiscal year change for company code PWAL, although the current system date is in the new fiscal year.
Procedure
Carry out the fiscal year change for company code PWAL.
Proceed
The error is quite understandable.We have to close 2007 and then perform the fiscal year change.But the problem is that the adjustment for the year 2007 is not yet complete.Is it the only solution with me that I should close the yr.2007 and again open it after the fiscal yr. change? If that is done can I take care of the adjustment in the posted depreciation? Or is it possible that the system date can be made back to 31.03.2009(very stupid ask!). The real problem is that my client has mistakely created some assets in the year 2007(by AS91 after changing the take over date) those should have been shown in the next year and also some assets are creted in the year 2008 by the same strange method those should be shown in the year 2007.What I am doing now is deleting these legacy assets and creating the new assets in the correct year.And this process is not yet complete.If I close the year 2007, then the depreciation of these legacy assets will also be posted.Later how can I reverse the effect?Also without seeing the reports I can't make the adjustments.Please suggest/advice.
Debabrata

Hi Debabrata,
You have to do all fiscal year closing steps for 2007. When you reopen it you can do a repeat run for 2007. (You can do the reapeat run only for the new/ changed assets.)
Try first to test this in an actual test system (document it and do the same in production). Perhaps as you know when 2009 is open I want to close 2008 in one week. All changes they make in the asset system (change depreciation keys, recalulating,...) can result in postings in 2007 / 2008 what they don't want and later fiscal year problems. You will found a lot off masages about this on the form.

OS X 10.4.11 Unable to print photos. Error message, "There are no themes located. Until at one theme is istalled this cannot be carried out" Please advise. Thanks

OS X 10.4.1 Unable to print photos. Error message appears, " There were no themes located. Until at least one theme is installed this cannot be carried out." please advise.

Check out OT's post in this thread:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=6394288&#6394288
Also, note his comments here:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=6998840&#6998840
> Look in your User/Library/Application Support/iPhoto folder for a Themes folder. If you find it there move it to the HD/Library/Application Support/iPhoto folder and reboot. Then try iPhoto again. That may save you having to go thru the reinstallation.
Regards
TD

Error message "Availability check was carried out"

Dear Experts,
I can't pass the Availability check and got this error message "Availability check was carried out"; but actually stock is available, don't know why.
I am trying CO06 check whether any opened SO was blocked or hold, but I don't found any; also try VKM4 for released seem not release issue.
Wilson

Hi,
As far as my knowledge goes, in sales order, if you click on Availability check, the system will certainly does the check and gives the message "Availability Check is carried out", but after that the schedule line is confirmed and you can save the order and proceed further. The check is carried out as we have manually checked, even when the stock is available.
Regards
Vamsi Javaji

What are the common errors that occur while extraction is carried out?

Hi all,
What are all the errors that occurs while extraction for fico, sd and mm?
Can anyone list me the errors along with the solution.
regds
hari

Hi hari shankar
It depends
Like the data level errors ,Short DUmps
USER EXIT ERRORS
some time source system code errors.
Hope itz clear a little atleast...!
Thanks & Regards
R M K
***Assigning pointz is the only way of saying thanx in SDN ***
**Winners dont do different things,they do things differently**
> Hi all,
>
> What are all the errors that occurs while extraction
> for fico, sd and mm?
>
> Can anyone list me the errors along with the
> solution.
>
> regds
> hari

Carry out period-end closing for material .... in the previous period

Dear Experts,
Currently we are performing Month-end Closing for period May 2011.
We got any error messages during Actual Costing Closing in Material Ledger.
Based on our investigation, system encounters that any materials has not been carried out Period Closing in the previous period.
In accordance with SAP Note 361236, we should perform this workaround starting from Single-level Price Determination until Reversing Closing Entries.
Assuming that this is the right SAP Note to resolve this issue, kindly advice the following items as follow:
u2022     Should we perform this workaround using the Latest Costing Run that is May 2011, since the period of April 2011 is CLOSED (OB52 and OKP1) ?
u2022     Should we perform the full steps in this workaround ( from Single-level Price Determination until Reversing Closing Entries ) with u2018MUST_xxxxxu2019 execution firstly and subsequently re-run this steps without u2018MUST_xxxxxu2019 execution ?
u2022     What is the impact of Reversing Closing Entries in our Financial Statement in period of April and May 2011?
u2022     Is there any other SAP Note for fixing the problem?
Thanks for your kind attention.
Regards,
(Vincent)

Hi Vincent,
You have not mentioned whether the issue is for few materials/plants or all materials/plants.
Find my reply to your queries:
u2022 Should we perform this workaround using the Latest Costing Run that is May 2011, since the period of April 2011 is CLOSED (OB52 and OKP1) ?
    You will not be able to run ACR (for the materials/plants) only May 2011 without closing the status for April 2011.
u2022 Should we perform the full steps in this workaround ( from Single-level Price Determination until Reversing Closing Entries ) with u2018MUST_xxxxxu2019 execution firstly and subsequently re-run this steps without u2018MUST_xxxxxu2019 execution ?
   If you want to run Actual Costing Run (ACR) for latest previous month (May 2011) and do not want to run ACR for previous months (Apr, Mar, etc.), you still need to close the status of materials by using must close.
1st you reverse ACR for May 2011. Then use must close for April month. Perform the full steps of ACR for May 2011.
You may encouter a issue (quantities and values are inconsisitant) for the materials which are having price varinances, etc. in Mar/Apr months. To resolve this issue you can follow with SAP support partner (service.sap.com).
u2022 What is the impact of Reversing Closing Entries in our Financial Statement in period of April and May 2011?
The imact of reversing entries in April and May is depend on the Single/Multi level price variances of Materials bcz after the reversal of closing entries you need to run the full steps of ACR. If your client is not interested to take impact in April, the better way is use must close for April and re-run ACR for May 2011.
u2022 Is there any other SAP Note for fixing the problem?
We also had similar issues but it was for few materials. We have used the above option. Had a issue (quantities and values are inconsisitant). Raised OSS message and resolved the issue.
Hope the above details may help you to resolve your issue.
Regards,
ADI

Substitution not carried out when WBS is added to an existing project......

Hi, I have created a substitution rule to substitute the investment profile in my projects with a blank for any WBS which is not level one. I am not sure why this rule does not take effect immediately a new WBS is included. When I try to carry out the substitution manually, I get the error message 'Error when processing asset under construction (AuC) for WBS element'. Any ideas how I can get this substituion to work when a new WBS is added to an existing project?

You should use the substitution otherway....
I believe your project is in REL status and also you have defaulted IM profile in the project, so whenever you create a WBSE, the IM profile is inherited to the WBSE and since it is in REL status, the system will create an AUC based on your IM profile and now you are using substituition to remove the IM profile so this will cause the problem...Instead of this....try this...do not default IM profile in project, and instead of removing IM profile for all WBSE which is not level 1, use substitution to write IM profile in WBSE which is only level 1.

"Multi-level error propagation carried out" in SCM 5.0

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for