Multi-user streams replication error in 10gR2

hi, i am testing multi-user streams replication,using the following sql statement:
begin
dbms_streams_adm.maintain_schemas(
schema_names                     => 'hr,scott,ddup',
source_directory_object           => null,
destination_directory_object      => null,
source_database                => 'yjsh.oracle.com',
destination_database           => 'test1.oracle.com',
perform_actions                => true,
bi_directional                     => false,
include_ddl                     => true,
instantiation      => dbms_streams_adm.instantiation_schema_network,
SCRIPT_DIRECTORY_OBJECT => 'admindir',
SCRIPT_NAME => 'generated_schemas_script.sql' );
end;
all objects in scott,ddup were successfully replicated to target database.
but in hr schema,only EMP_DETAILS_VIEW was replicated to target db.
all other objects were not replicated.
and there was no error in alert.log and dba_apply_error.
sqlplus hr/hr@test1
HR > select * from tab;
TNAME TABTYPE CLUSTERID
EMP_DETAILS_VIEW VIEW
1 row selected.
anyone know how to resolve this problem?
Your feedback is greatly appreciated !

Hi
did you find a solution to your problem?I too have the same problerm. But what I understand is , When the driver fails to connect to the database due to wrong password or username, It repeatedly attempts to connect. So is there any way to restrict the number os attempts made by the driver?I guess Jconnect driver has some attributes to do this.Does someone know if there are any other drivers?

Similar Messages

Multi - User Oracle Driver Error Catching

Has anyone ever come across problems with any version of the Oracle Thin JDBC drivers whereby:
User attempts to access DB through a login JSP. A SUCCESSFUL connection is returned almost immediately. Fine.
An UNSUCCESSFUL connection is caught by an errorpage JSP - however, the JDBC drivers seem to take a long time to return the failed login message to the JSP. It opens many sockets and communicates with the DBMS almost randomly - it does get there in the end, but by that time most users have closed their browsers etc - subsequent login attempts by anyone are hampered by the opened sockets/forgotten connections etc.
Thanks,

Hi
did you find a solution to your problem?I too have the same problerm. But what I understand is , When the driver fails to connect to the database due to wrong password or username, It repeatedly attempts to connect. So is there any way to restrict the number os attempts made by the driver?I guess Jconnect driver has some attributes to do this.Does someone know if there are any other drivers?

Error d124 Multi user calendar

Hello,
we moved all of our users from one PO to another, both GW2012SP2. When the users now open their multi user calendar they get the error "d124".
When i open the multi-user list in a users mailbox there are entries from the old po an the new po. I tried to remove the old entries by click the Name, click Remove User, click OK to save. When i re-open the list, the removed users dont appear. Now i closed the Client, start it again and all of the removed users are shown up again in the multi-user list...
Does anyone have an idea how to remove the user in the multi-user list permamently? Or have any GW Check options to solve this?
kind regards
Benjamin

In article <[email protected]>, Bmulfinger wrote:
> we moved all of our users from one PO to another, both GW2012SP2. When
> the users now open their multi user calendar they get the error "d124".
Moving in every sense of the term always leaves some loose ends like
this. This is why as much as possible we like to move POs and not the
users if we can avoid it. Basically some of the connectsions betweek
users broke because a bunch of them are still looking at the old PO, so
we need to work through those connections and fix them.
>
> When i open the multi-user list in a users mailbox there are entries
> from the old po an the new po.
In looking this up I found I had a user in my list that was no longer in
the system and I had the same behaviour in trying to deal with it. I
realized that this was only the users I have proxied into, so I went into
my proxy list, removed the offending user, and after a restart the
problem went away. So how many of these do you need to deal with?
Before we look at the specialized GWchecks, make sure you are running a
regular set of them and checking the resulting outputs for any errors
that might point you to parts of the cleanup.
http://www.konecnyad.ca/andyk/gwlogs.htm
Running through the TopDown rebuild (TID 3347260 at
https://www.novell.com/support/kb/doc.php?id=3347260) and selecting the
Rebuild Indexes after doing the other parts at those levels may help.
Afterwards an Analyze/Fix of Structure & Index would be useful, checking
the results to see if it reports problems. If there are such problems,
rerun again to see that they are gone.
Andy of
KonecnyConsulting.ca in Toronto
Knowledge Partner
http://forums.novell.com/member.php/75037-konecnya
If you find a post helpful and are logged in the Web interface, please
show your appreciation by clicking on the star below. Thanks!

Error in setting up Multi-user RPD

Hi
I've managed to set up a local MUD RPD on my laptop for testing purposes. I am able to make updates and then check these into the shared RPD. However when trying to access the shared RPD I receive the message that I am only able to update the RPD in Read-Only mode.
What I want to know is have I missed a step in cecking the updates into the shared RPD which has left a lock on the shared RPD?
The following files are listed in the shared directory:
modified subset of shared_samplesales.001
modified subset of shared_samplesales.002
shared_samplesales.000
shared_samplesales.001
shared_samplesales.002
shared_samplesales.002.csv
shared_samplesales.mhl
shared_samplesales.rpd
Regards
Adnan

Hi
I may have the answer. I copied the file into a different folder and I was able to open the file in offline mode.
It seems that when you set the multi-user RPD in the Tool>Options>Multiuser the folder that you specify here automatically any repository in this folder can only be opened as read-only. I changed the foler path to where I copied the the RPD to and low and behold I was only able to open the file in read-only mode.
A

Multi User Conference Error (Multiple Subnets)

Hello,
I do not have a Mac OS X Server, but I was told that the OS X Server used Jabber and I am using a Jabber server (Windows based). I was hoping to find someone who has general knowledge of what I'm doing to possibly help out. I did originally post this question here: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=4921360#4921360
but I have not gotten a solution yet. It was suggested I post here because they are both Jabber servers.
Basically, I purchased 3 identical iMac computers. They are all running OS X version 10.4.9 with 2.16 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo and 2 GB of RAM. They are all running iChat AV 3.1.8. For authentication, we are using a Windows based Jabber server.
My company has three locations connected via a hardware VPN. Each site has their own subnet and all ports are open between the three sites.
When we first purchased the Mac computers, two went to Location X and were put on Subnet X. The other one was shipped to Location Y and put on Subnet Y. We tested three way video conferencing and it worked fine. We then packed up one of the computers and shipped it out to Location Z on Subnet Z. I can connect to Location X and Location Z on a 1 to 1 basis, but I can't begin a 3 way conversation. It tells me the user in Location Z can't enter a multi user conference.
Audio chat works, as well as text chat. Video chat does not. Based on the specs, I don't believe it is a hardware issue and I don't believe bandwidth is an issue. I spoke with tech support and they said I need only 100 kbps, which I have above and beyond.
As per my previous post in the iChat discussion, the bandwidth needed is actually 384k, which we have. It was also suggested that I run the cron scripts, which did not help. All ports are open, which is not something we need to consider.
I believe the root of the issue is the fact they are all on different subnets, but I can't seem to figure out how to fix that. It was suggested that I use Bonjour as a test, but I do not want a huge amount of traffic running around on the network as it detects the two Macs I need it to find. I have close to 400 users (most with two computers), over 100 servers, 50 users in each of the remote sites...and then to do that over a VPN.....
Any and all help is greatly appreciated and I thank you in advance.
P.S. - I am not super experienced at Mac, but I can usually find my way around. I have been mostly a PC guy most of my life.

Hi,
I appreciate that it was suggested that you post the question on this group, but I'm not sure that this is jabber technology problem.
I feel it is very important that you clarify some points for me.
Are you saying that the problem is only at location Z?
Can you confirm exactly what happens when the ichat Z tries to start the the way conference? Do the other clients get any messages (most important - does the status of client Z change in the window of clients X and Y?)
Need to know what happens when X and Y initiates the video chat.
Please clarity the above.
Jabber as a protocol set is very robust to issues of subnet and firewalls. The initiation of the group conference is processed via the jabber server, but once that phase in complete, the clients communicate directly with each other. If voice works, the video should also work, as the only difference is number of ports used (and bandwidth).
To help, I can give you access to a jabber server outside of your network to test things.

Video display errors with multi-user

Macbook Pro or Mavericks bug
10.9.3, MacBook Pro (Late 2010), MacBookPro6,2
When using the multi-user switching, the background image is distorted.
To recreate:
Establish user "B" with a background image on screen. I have three Spaces with three different images. All users logged out.
Login as user "A"
Login to user "B" using the Menubar to select the other user without logging out of user "A"
Note bar on right-hand side of screen and distorted colors.
User A has one of the Apple background photographs
User B has personal photographs from 8 MP camera
If user B is logged in from the Login Window then all is OK. Display issue only shows up when logging in from other user via fast user switching (or whatever that is called). If user B logs out and logs in again from the Login Window all is OK.

Can you post screenshots of the distortion, someone may recognize it.
What you describe sounds like one user as something running that doesn't work well with FUS (I think it's still called 'fast user switching' ).
You can disable all login items by holding alt as you click the login button. See if that has any effect. If it does you know you need to look at the users login items (in System Preferences > Users & groups). In not sure if the 'alt trick' works inside the fast user switching menu, so you may want to verify the flaw exists when going to the login window, then reboot & try the 'alt trick' with the same steps.
The other thing to try is using a background image that has been resaved via Preview's export (or another app). It's possible the file itself is a reason for the issue, do standard backgrounds do the same?

TTS - Internal error User not found error

DB version:10.2.0.4
OS - AIX6.1
Could someone let me know how to resolve this error?. I'm running an export of metadata for TTS using the command below. The TTS export is working fine on other tablespaces of the same database.
I'm running export with "/ as sysdba".
expdp DUMPFILE=<>.dmp DIRECTORY=xtts_dir logfile=<>.log TRANSPORT_TABLESPACES=TBSP1,TBSP2,TBSP3 transport_full_check=y
ORA-39123: Data Pump transportable tablespace job aborted
ORA-29336: Internal error [user not found] [48] from DBMS_PLUGTS
Job "SYS"."SYS_EXPORT_TRANSPORTABLE_06" stopped due to fatal error

It seems my issue is due to the streams admin user. The streams replication was setup on the objects under these tablespaces. The streams replication was removed and strmadmin user is also dropped. I have enabled trace and got the below message in the trace file. Does any of you face the same issue?.
ORA-39123: Data Pump transportable tablespace job aborted
ORA-29336: Internal error [user not found] [48] from DBMS_PLUGTS
Streams : knlcfdrl
error 604 while looking up the Streams tables.
kwqaadqrs: error 39119 during add rule Here is the command used for removing streams.
execute DBMS_STREAMS_ADM.REMOVE_STREAMS_CONFIGURATION();

Several users on a single file issue: Hosting a multi user Quickbooks file on the WD EX4

Hello everyone. This is going to sound like a super specific third party support issue - but there are some universal things going on here that may help others regarding multiple users of individual files on the EX4. My company houses client and billing files on the EX4. It's all been well and good until we recently allowed multi-user access to our Quickbooks company file. Of course the goal is to have multiple employees working on the file at the same time from different computers. We purchased licenses for each - everything is on the up and up. Whereas I could access the company file on the EX4 with no problems on my computer as a single user, now as soon as I turn on multiuser mode in QB to allow others to access the file on the EX4, the file becomes inaccessible. What do you guys think is happening where one user access to a file on the EX4 is fine, but multiuser access causes the file to be inaccessible? How do you fix it? Other thoughts, there doesn't seem to be a limitation on the EX4 relating to multiple people accessing the same file - streaming the same song for example. So why would a billing database file be any different? Especially when the licenses and program allow that access. Here's more info, if I host the file on my desktop computer everyone can access it in multiuser mode over the network. The limitation is the WD EX4. What do you think is going on? (I'd appreciate any insight as I am talking to both tech support teams, QB and WD, this week.)

Thank you so much for your reply. The error shows up when one switches to multi-user mode. It states: Error H101, H202, H303, or H505: when opening your company file When you open a company file in multi-user mode, you see an error:You're trying to work with a company file located on another computer, and this copy of QuickBooks can't reach the server on that computer (H202).You're trying to work with a company file located on another computer, and that computer needs additional installation and setup. (H101, H303, and H505).It appears that the QuickBooks software on computer [server name] is set up to allow shared connections to the company file, but the QuickBooks software on your computer is unable to communicate with it. (H202).Most often it's an H202 error which suggests that the program can't reach the server on that computer (NAS location). Why would the NAS location become invisible / unreachable once multi-user mode is on? I really appreciate your expert brainstorm and ideas.

Message filtering in propagation process (stream replication environment)

Hi!
We have fine configured stream replication in star topology:
ORCL2 <=> ORCL1 <=> ORCL3
Where the ORCL1 is "headquarters" and there is no message flow between ORCL2 and ORCL3.
For some reason we want to filter messages in propagation processes, e.g. DML captured on ORCL1 should be replicated only to ORCL2 or only to ORCL3. There is one propagation process for each "satellite" database.
To solve this problem I have written function:
FUNCTION Replicate_Lcr (
p_lcr IN SYS.lcr$_row_record)
RETURN VARCHAR2 IS
which will be making a decision whether to pass the message (return 'Y') or not (return 'N').
But there is problem: rule is evaluated and function is executed (there is insert into 'stream_log_lcr' table) but value of the expression seems to be 'FALSE' and message (LCR) is not beeing sent to ORCL2 (or to ORCL3).
When I remove function 'Replicate_Lcr' from propagation rule condition then every message captured by capture process on ORCL1 reaches destination database (ORCL2 or ORCL3).
The second observation is that, if I run the same code on ORCL2 or ORCL3 then everything seems to be OK: there is insert into 'stream_log_lcr' table and DML captured on ORCL2 (or ORCL3) appears in ORCL1 ("headquarters").
I suppose that this could be problem with other version of database on "headquarters" (ORCL1) or configuration issues.
I will appreciate every suggestion.
Databases:
ORCL1: 64-bit Windows, ver. 10.2.0.4.0, Windows 2008 server
ORCL2: 32-bit Windows, ver. 10.2.0.1.0, Windows XP
ORCL3: 32-bit Windows, ver. 10.2.0.1.0, Windows XP
SQL code run on ORCL1:
CREATE TABLE stream_log_lcr (
data DATE NOT NULL,
msg SYS.lcr$_row_record NOT NULL
-- simplified, always return 'Y'
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION Replicate_Lcr (
p_lcr IN SYS.lcr$_row_record)
RETURN VARCHAR2 IS
PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION;
BEGIN
IF p_lcr IS NOT NULL
THEN
INSERT INTO stream_log_lcr
VALUES (SYSDATE,
p_lcr);
COMMIT;
END IF;
RETURN 'Y';
END;
-- create propagation process with above function in rule condition
BEGIN
DBMS_STREAMS_ADM.add_schema_propagation_rules
(schema_name => 'data_schema',
streams_name => 'primary_to_secondary2',
source_queue_name => 'strmadmin.capture_primary',
destination_queue_name => 'strmadmin.from_primary@ORCL2',
include_dml => TRUE,
include_ddl => TRUE,
source_database => 'ORCL1',
and_condition => ' strmadmin.Replicate_Lcr(:dml) = ''Y'' ',
inclusion_rule => TRUE,
queue_to_queue => TRUE);
END;
-- check if function 'Replicate_Lcr' was evoked:
SELECT * FROM stream_log_lcr ORDER BY data;

hi porzer,
In Propagation process ( source) also 0 errors. But in apply ( dest ) under statistics under server status is displaying as IDLE. And Coordinator status is APPLYING. In Capture (source) no error. In Applying ( dest ) no error. what else i can do please?
up to now what i did i am telling:
I had 2 databases had one table same table. one database i changed the mode to ARCHIVELOG mode. Another database is in NOARCHIVELOG mode only. In first database setup streams i run. And i run manually 2 .sql files and one .dat file like this :
SQL>@e:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_2\sysman\report\OTEST_ADMIN_NON_OMS_SETUP.sql
SQL>host e:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_2\sysman\report\OTEST_ADMIN_NON_OMS_exportimport.bat
SQL>@e:\oracle\product\10.2.0\client_2\sysman\report\OTEST_ADMIN_NON_OMS_startup.sql
Any thing else i can do? i didn't have metalink registration.i hope i am not boring you.
Thanks in advance.

Trying to access Lion server remote using multi-user access, but from a legacy Leopard system

Just purchased a mini server running Lion, and got screen sharing working fine from my legacy system (32-bit so Leopard only). However, I would like to run in multi-user mode, so someone can use the Lion system and another person can access their own account, from the older Leopard system, at the same time. Using multi-user rather than screen sharing. But Leopard does not have the option on the Finder/Share Screen command, the pop-up window to select screen sharing or new virtual session. So, is there a way still to run a new virtual session from a remote client running Leopard? Since the multi-user capability resides on the Lion server, it should be possible, but how, without the pop-up menu?
Message was edited by: Kurt-Syracuse

Hey. I suggest you check out http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=9839785#9839785, where there are a couple solutions posted in regard to the error code -36 when connecting to a samba share. Good luck!
Jeremy A.
Tekserve Intern

Set multi user column with PowerShell used to work in 2010 but no longer works in 2013

In SharePoint 2010 I used PowerShell to set the value of multi user people columns and it worked really well. I attempt to use the same PowerShell to set the same column type in SharePoint 2013 and it fails.
here is the PowerShell that I use in 2010:
$web = Get-SPWeb "http://intranet"
$list = $web.lists["TestList"]
$item = $list.items.add()
$item["Title"] = "Test multi user column"
$users = @("Domain\user1", "Domain\user2")
$userList = new-object Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFieldUserValueCollection
foreach($user in $users)
$spUser = $web.EnsureUser($user)
$userValue = new-object Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFieldUserValue($web, $spUser.ID, $spUser.Name)
$userList.Add($userValue)
$item["MultiUserColumn"] = $userList
$item.update()
I have used this on three SharePoint 2013 farms with differing results. On two of them I receive an error when running $item.update(): Exception calling "Update" with "0" argument(s): "Invalid look-up value. A look-up
field contains invalid data. Please check the value and try again."
If I take one of the users out of the $users list then it works fine, but it will not allow multiple users to be set with PowerShell. I can use the GUI to add more than one user but not PowerShell.
Does anyone know if these methods have changed in 2013? I haven't been able to find anyone else with this issue.
mmm... coffee...

Not sure but maybe something to do with casting. Below is the code snippet from one of the blogs. Try modifying your script like below and see if still you get the error
[Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFieldUserValueCollection]$lotsofpeople = New-Object Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFieldUserValueCollection
$user1 = $w.EnsureUser("domain\user1");
$user1Value = New-Object Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFieldUserValue($w, $user1.Id, $user1.LoginName)
$user2 = $w.EnsureUser("domain\user2");
$user2Value = New-Object Microsoft.SharePoint.SPFieldUserValue($w, $user2.Id, $user2.LoginName);
$lotsofpeople.Add($user1Value);
$lotsofpeople.Add($user2Value);
$i["lotsofpeoplefield"] = $lotsofpeople;
$i.Update();
#-or-
$l.Fields["lotsofpeoplefield"].ParseAndSetValue($i,$lotsofpeople);
$i.Update();
Reference to the link
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/20831.sharepoint-a-complete-guide-to-getting-and-setting-fields-using-powershell.aspx
Geetanjali Arora | My blogs |

10.6.2 SMB - QB 2005 PC won't run in Multi User

Hi there,
This is a pretty specific issue but i'll throw this out anyway.
I setup a brand new 10.6.2 server alongside our old 10.4.11 server.
I cloned the contents of the "shared data" from the old box to the new one.
We have had the SMB service running for Quickbooks 2005 running on 2 PCs (Xp Pro clients), shared via QB's "Multi User" mode.
The new server's SMB share, identical in permissions etc to the old one, will not allow QB to open the file in Multi User mode. It gives an error to the effect of "Your company file has been damaged". My attempts to repair the QB file had no effect.
If I copy the same company file back onto our old Tiger Server's SMB share, it works fine. I assume this is simply a difference in Samba versions, but I have no idea how to troubleshoot it.
I obviously have a workaround for now, but it's less than ideal to have an entire Xserve on to share a Quickbooks file.
Any insight would be appreciated.
~p

Bumped into this article; I'll post back after i give it a shot.
http://edoceo.com/liber/network-samba-quickbooks
The gist of it:
"the directories that will be the root of the share must be owned by the group that the users who will access are in and they must be able to write"

No data found in Update (streams replication)

Hi,
Our database is setup for streams replication of few tables from source database DB1 to destination database DB2. The source tables have different primary key columns than the primary key columns at destination. All tables at source and destination have primary keys, unique keys and foreign keys. There are unique keys on source tables which are used as primary keys on destination. For example, table TAB1 at source DB1 has primary key column COL1 and unique key column COL2. Whereas at destination table TAB1 on DB2 has COL2 as primary key and COL1 is dropped from the LCR.
We have problem now, inserts are replicated perfectly, but not updates. Updates are giving “no data found” error. I went through the oracle documentation and I tried following:
1. Setting keys using DBMS_APPLY_ADM.SET_KEY_COLUMNS. It didn’t work. Unique key column was set as key columns.
2. Setting update conflict handler using DBMS_APPLY_ADM.SET_UPDATE_CONFLICT_HANDLER. It didn’t work. Unique key column was set as resolution_column and “DISCARD” as method_name (parameters).
Is there anything I am missing? Please help me in resolving this error. If you have any leads or sample code would help me greatly. Appreciated your help.
Thanks

Thanks for our time and help. Yes, you are right.
FYI... we had supplemental logging. Our team tried with different configuration combinations yesterday. Finally, we found that unconditional supplemental logging must be there to resolve the issue. We had conditional supplemental logging thou. After changing it to unconditional, it was working. There is no need for update conflict handlers or substitute keys.
Thanks

Set Database Back to Multi User from Single User

I am using SharePoint Services 3.0 (SP1) with default configuration options, which installs the Microsoft##SSEE instance of SQL to my local C:\ drive.
While attempting to relocate the files to another drive, I set one of the databases (as recommended) to Single User by using the SQL Server Management Express tool.
I cannot now reset that database to Multi User, even by executing the query
exec sp_dboption 'database_name', 'single user', ''FALSE'
again by using the Management Express Tool.
Can someone please help, in plain english???? Thanks

I have similar issue.
I have took backup of WSUS (Windows Server 2002 R2) Windows internal database using SQL Server 2008 Management Studio and restored on Windows Server 2012 R2 Server.
Now SUSDB database was in Single User mode. I have tried ALTER DATABASE <<Database Name>> SET MULTI_USER WITH NO_WAIT and i'm getting blow error.
Msg 5069, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
ALTER DATABASE statement failed.
How i can change it Multi User?
Thanks
Uma

FSMO Replication Error

I have been getting a pattern of errors on my DC. I have two pair of eyes on these errors, but everything seems to running ok. The only issue we've had is our workstations were putting out the "Trust domain relationship failed..." error. We were
able fix this issue by removing those machines from the domain, changing the names, and then adding them back. My only concern is that the errors below were the cause of that, and that the issue may return unless this is resolved. I've checked all of my services
and DNS's settings. IPv6 is on. There haven't been any changes to the server in sometime. Which is the baffling part. Any insight on this would be very helpful. I apologize in advance for not being well versed in this area... AD Replication is not my strongest
point.
Error 1
Log Name: Directory Service
Source: Microsoft-Windows-ActiveDirectory_DomainService
Date: 1/15/2015 9:16:53 AM
Event ID: 2092
Task Category: Replication
Level: Warning
Keywords: Classic
User: ANONYMOUS LOGON
Computer: LAHDC1.LAH
Description:
This server is the owner of the following FSMO role, but does not consider it valid. For the partition which contains the FSMO, this server has not replicated successfully with any of its partners since this server has been restarted. Replication errors are
preventing validation of this role.
Operations which require contacting a FSMO operation master will fail until this condition is corrected.
FSMO Role: CN=RID Manager$,CN=System,DC=LAH
User Action:
1. Initial synchronization is the first early replications done by a system as it is starting. A failure to initially synchronize may explain why a FSMO role cannot be validated. This process is explained in KB article 305476.
2. This server has one or more replication partners, and replication is failing for all of these partners. Use the command repadmin /showrepl to display the replication errors. Correct the error in question. For example there maybe problems with IP connectivity,
DNS name resolution, or security authentication that are preventing successful replication.
3. In the rare event that all replication partners being down is an expected occurance, perhaps because of maintenance or a disaster recovery, you can force the role to be validated. This can be done by using NTDSUTIL.EXE to seize the role to the same server.
This may be done using the steps provided in KB articles 255504 and 324801 on http://support.microsoft.com.
The following operations may be impacted:
Schema: You will no longer be able to modify the schema for this forest.
Domain Naming: You will no longer be able to add or remove domains from this forest.
PDC: You will no longer be able to perform primary domain controller operations, such as Group Policy updates and password resets for non-Active Directory Domain Services accounts.
RID: You will not be able to allocation new security identifiers for new user accounts, computer accounts or security groups.
Infrastructure: Cross-domain name references, such as universal group memberships, will not be updated properly if their target object is moved or renamed.
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
<System>
<Provider Name="Microsoft-Windows-ActiveDirectory_DomainService" Guid="{0e8478c5-3605-4e8c-8497-1e730c959516}" EventSourceName="NTDS General" />
<EventID Qualifiers="32768">2092</EventID>
<Version>0</Version>
<Level>3</Level>
<Task>5</Task>
<Opcode>0</Opcode>
<Keywords>0x8080000000000000</Keywords>
<TimeCreated SystemTime="2015-01-15T15:16:53.716341400Z" />
<EventRecordID>19509</EventRecordID>
<Correlation />
<Execution ProcessID="492" ThreadID="1088" />
<Channel>Directory Service</Channel>
<Computer>LAHDC1.LAH</Computer>
<Security UserID="S-1-5-7" />
</System>
<EventData>
<Data>CN=RID Manager$,CN=System,DC=LAH</Data>
</EventData>
</Event>
Error 2
Log Name: Directory Service
Source: Microsoft-Windows-ActiveDirectory_DomainService
Date: 1/15/2015 9:16:33 AM
Event ID: 2887
Task Category: LDAP Interface
Level: Warning
Keywords: Classic
User: ANONYMOUS LOGON
Computer: LAHDC1.LAH
Description:
During the previous 24 hour period, some clients attempted to perform LDAP binds that were either:
(1) A SASL (Negotiate, Kerberos, NTLM, or Digest) LDAP bind that did not request signing (integrity validation), or
(2) A LDAP simple bind that was performed on a cleartext (non-SSL/TLS-encrypted) connection
This directory server is not currently configured to reject such binds. The security of this directory server can be significantly enhanced by configuring the server to reject such binds. For more details and information on how to make this configuration
change to the server, please see http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=87923.
Summary information on the number of these binds received within the past 24 hours is below.
You can enable additional logging to log an event each time a client makes such a bind, including information on which client made the bind. To do so, please raise the setting for the "LDAP Interface Events" event logging category to level 2
or higher.
Number of simple binds performed without SSL/TLS: 0
Number of Negotiate/Kerberos/NTLM/Digest binds performed without signing: 994
Event Xml:
<Event xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/win/2004/08/events/event">
<System>
<Provider Name="Microsoft-Windows-ActiveDirectory_DomainService" Guid="{0e8478c5-3605-4e8c-8497-1e730c959516}" EventSourceName="NTDS General" />
<EventID Qualifiers="32768">2887</EventID>
<Version>0</Version>
<Level>3</Level>
<Task>16</Task>
<Opcode>0</Opcode>
<Keywords>0x8080000000000000</Keywords>
<TimeCreated SystemTime="2015-01-15T15:16:33.350305000Z" />
<EventRecordID>19508</EventRecordID>
<Correlation />
<Execution ProcessID="492" ThreadID="692" />
<Channel>Directory Service</Channel>
<Computer>LAHDC1.LAH</Computer>
<Security UserID="S-1-5-7" />
</System>
<EventData>
<Data>0</Data>
<Data>994</Data>
</EventData>
</Event>
DCDIAG Results
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7601]
Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
C:\Users\Administrator.LAH>dcdiag.exe
Directory Server Diagnosis
Performing initial setup:
Trying to find home server...
Home Server = LAHDC1
* Identified AD Forest.
Done gathering initial info.
Doing initial required tests
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\LAHDC1
Starting test: Connectivity
......................... LAHDC1 passed test Connectivity
Doing primary tests
Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\LAHDC1
Starting test: Advertising
......................... LAHDC1 passed test Advertising
Starting test: FrsEvent
......................... LAHDC1 passed test FrsEvent
Starting test: DFSREvent
......................... LAHDC1 passed test DFSREvent
Starting test: SysVolCheck
......................... LAHDC1 passed test SysVolCheck
Starting test: KccEvent
A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x8000082C
Time Generated: 01/15/2015 08:47:34
Event String:
A warning event occurred. EventID: 0x8000082C
Time Generated: 01/15/2015 08:47:53
Event String:
......................... LAHDC1 passed test KccEvent
Starting test: KnowsOfRoleHolders
......................... LAHDC1 passed test KnowsOfRoleHolders
Starting test: MachineAccount
......................... LAHDC1 passed test MachineAccount
Starting test: NCSecDesc
Error NT AUTHORITY\ENTERPRISE DOMAIN CONTROLLERS doesn't have
Replicating Directory Changes In Filtered Set
access rights for the naming context:
DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=LAH
Error NT AUTHORITY\ENTERPRISE DOMAIN CONTROLLERS doesn't have
Replicating Directory Changes In Filtered Set
access rights for the naming context:
DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=LAH
......................... LAHDC1 failed test NCSecDesc
Starting test: NetLogons
......................... LAHDC1 passed test NetLogons
Starting test: ObjectsReplicated
......................... LAHDC1 passed test ObjectsReplicated
Starting test: Replications
[Replications Check,LAHDC1] A recent replication attempt failed:
From LAHDC02 to LAHDC1
Naming Context: DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=LAH
The replication generated an error (8456):
The source server is currently rejecting replication requests.
The failure occurred at 2015-01-15 08:46:33.
The last success occurred at 2014-10-03 15:52:49.
2494 failures have occurred since the last success.
Replication has been explicitly disabled through the server
options.
[Replications Check,LAHDC1] A recent replication attempt failed:
From LAHDC02 to LAHDC1
Naming Context: DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=LAH
The replication generated an error (8456):
The source server is currently rejecting replication requests.
The failure occurred at 2015-01-15 08:46:33.
The last success occurred at 2014-10-03 15:52:49.
2494 failures have occurred since the last success.
Replication has been explicitly disabled through the server
options.
[Replications Check,LAHDC1] A recent replication attempt failed:
From LAHDC02 to LAHDC1
Naming Context: CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=LAH
The replication generated an error (8456):
The source server is currently rejecting replication requests.
The failure occurred at 2015-01-15 08:46:33.
The last success occurred at 2014-10-03 15:52:49.
2494 failures have occurred since the last success.
Replication has been explicitly disabled through the server
options.
[Replications Check,LAHDC1] A recent replication attempt failed:
From LAHDC02 to LAHDC1
Naming Context: CN=Configuration,DC=LAH
The replication generated an error (8456):
The source server is currently rejecting replication requests.
The failure occurred at 2015-01-15 08:46:33.
The last success occurred at 2014-10-03 15:52:49.
3994 failures have occurred since the last success.
Replication has been explicitly disabled through the server
options.
[Replications Check,LAHDC1] A recent replication attempt failed:
From LAHDC02 to LAHDC1
Naming Context: DC=LAH
The replication generated an error (8456):
The source server is currently rejecting replication requests.
The failure occurred at 2015-01-15 08:46:33.
The last success occurred at 2014-10-03 16:24:02.
2664 failures have occurred since the last success.
Replication has been explicitly disabled through the server
options.
......................... LAHDC1 failed test Replications
Starting test: RidManager
......................... LAHDC1 passed test RidManager
Starting test: Services
......................... LAHDC1 passed test Services
Starting test: SystemLog
......................... LAHDC1 passed test SystemLog
Starting test: VerifyReferences
......................... LAHDC1 passed test VerifyReferences
Running partition tests on : ForestDnsZones
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... ForestDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... ForestDnsZones passed test
CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : DomainDnsZones
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... DomainDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... DomainDnsZones passed test
CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : Schema
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... Schema passed test CheckSDRefDom
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... Schema passed test CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : Configuration
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... Configuration passed test CheckSDRefDom
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... Configuration passed test CrossRefValidation
Running partition tests on : LAH
Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
......................... LAH passed test CheckSDRefDom
Starting test: CrossRefValidation
......................... LAH passed test CrossRefValidation
Running enterprise tests on : LAH
Starting test: LocatorCheck
......................... LAH passed test LocatorCheck
Starting test: Intersite
......................... LAH passed test Intersite
C:\Users\Administrator.LAH>

I see the following errors:
"The source server is currently rejecting replication requests."
"Replication has been explicitly disabled through the server options."
I would recommend starting with this MS KB which describes your problem: https://support.microsoft.com/kb/2023007?wa=wsignin1.0
Also, I would recommend that you follow the recommendations I shared in this Wiki: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/18513.active-directory-replication-issues-basic-troubleshooting-steps-single-ad-domain-in-a-single-ad-forest.aspx
This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.
Ahmed MALEK
My Website Link
My Linkedin Profile
My MVP Profile

Multi-user streams replication error in 10gR2

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for