Multimapping 1:N issue

Hi everybody,
I have a problem with multimapping. My scenario is:
FILE (Content conversion) -> PI -> BAPI
My source structure looks like:
but its not coming.
When i test with the source structure in message mapping didn´t work either, but if I add the tags Messages and Message1 it work out fine.
What is the solution?? should I add the tags with XSLT mapping? it doesn´t have to much sense to me,  this should work properly without doing that...
Thanks in advance!

Hi Luis,
exact about PI 7.1. Thanks for the lesson, I learned something today...
So to resume:
1. in I.R - Message Mapping, on tab "Signature", you have occurence : 1 --> 0..unbounded.
2. in I.R - Operation Mapping, you have occurence : 1 --> 0..unbounded.
3. in I.D - Interface Determination, for your bapi, you have Multiplicity = 0.. unbounded, as it's automatically found (based on I.R).
And when you process a source file, you have almost nothing in payload of your target Bapi.
Is that right ?
if yes, the only error that I see is an error in your Message Mapping, probably on node "Message1" or "bapi".
or eventually a problem of cache if you have recently change something in your flow...
Regards.
Mickael

Similar Messages

  • Multimapping issue

    Hi Experts,
    Scenario : SOAP -> XI -> RFC
    Source side : One message
    Target side : Two RFCs
    Depends on..one of the source field value I have to trigger the particular RFC.
    IR Objects
    1. Interface mapping - 1
    Source message interface occurance - 1
    Target RFCs 0 to Unbounded occurance
    Mapping
    1. XSLT Step1 - Source rootnode contains namespace. To remove that I have used the XSLT mapping.
    CODE:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <xsl:stylesheet version="2.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
         <xsl:output method="xml" version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" indent="yes"/>
         <xsl:template match="*">
              <xsl:element name="{local-name()}">
                   <xsl:apply-templates select="@* | node()"/>
              </xsl:element>
         </xsl:template>
    </xsl:stylesheet>
    2. XSLT Step2 - To add the Message tags in the starting for multimapping.
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <xsl:stylesheet version="2.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
         <xsl:output method="xml" version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" indent="yes"/>
         <xsl:template match="/">
              <ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
                   <ns0:Message1>
                        <xsl:apply-templates/>
                   </ns0:Message1>
              </ns0:Messages>
         </xsl:template>
         <xsl:template match="@*|node()">
              <xsl:copy>
                   <xsl:apply-templates select="@*|node()"/>
              </xsl:copy>
         </xsl:template>
    </xsl:stylesheet>
    3. Graphical - Multimapping
    ID objects
    Interface determination - Selected the option enhanced. remaining all similar to normal interface.
    Able to get the required results from MM and IM testing, but not from ID Test Configuration and runtime workbench.
    (For IM testing : I have used the acutal payload)
    Getting the below error from runtime workbench.
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
    - <!--  Request Message Mapping
      -->
    - <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
      <SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
      <SAP:Code area="MAPPING">GENERIC</SAP:Code>
      <SAP:P1>Split mapping created no messages</SAP:P1>
      <SAP:P2 />
      <SAP:P3 />
      <SAP:P4 />
      <SAP:AdditionalText />
      <SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
      <SAP:Stack>Split mapping created no messages</SAP:Stack>
      <SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
      </SAP:Error>
    Could you please tell me how to resolve the issue.
    Edited by: Sundari David on Nov 29, 2011 11:52 AM

    Hi,
    if you are going with the option of mapping based message split with you XSLT mapping , you need to include Message and MessageN tags as the top nodes in your target msgs.
    The problem is the Target XML that is produced contains the namespace
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge">
       <ns0:Message1>
       </ns0:Message1
    u2026
    This needs to be removed.
    Use this XSLT as post processing after the main message mapping. Save this code as XSLT, zip and then import as external archive and then add this as last step in interface mapping.
    Let me know how it goes - it will fix your namespace issue not sure if you'll have problems with the result it produces.
    <xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform">
    <xsl:output method="xml" indent="no"/>
    <xsl:template match="/|comment()|processing-instruction()">
        <xsl:copy>
          <xsl:apply-templates/>
        </xsl:copy>
    </xsl:template>
    <xsl:template match="*">
        <xsl:element name="{local-name()}">
          <xsl:apply-templates select="@*|node()"/>
        </xsl:element>
    </xsl:template>
    <xsl:template match="@*">
        <xsl:attribute name="{local-name()}">
          <xsl:value-of select="."/>
        </xsl:attribute>
    </xsl:template>
    </xsl:stylesheet>
    i hope it will helpful.
    regards,
    ganesh.

  • PI 73 sp2 - issue with multimapping

    We are having a strange issue in PI 73 sp2. We recently upgraded from PI 711 to PI 73 and migrated all our development artifacts over to the new instance. We have a multimapping scenario (1:3) which was working fine in the PI 711 instance is not working anymore in the new PI 73 instance.
    It is a
                                       SOAP (AE) -> IE -> JDBC/ABAP Proxy
    scenario.
    We can see the payload in the RWB in Comm Channel monitoring but when it comes to the IE, mapping runtime is receiving an empty payload and the mapping fails.
    Has anyone encountered any such issue ? I am hoping that someone can point me to a OSS note as it doesnt seem like anything is wrong with the interface as such. It was working just fine in the PI 711 instance and no changes were made in the new instance.
    Thanks
    Sridhar

    Gabriel .. we are using the SOAP Adapter, we did update the meta-data to the PI BASIS 7.30 version. We are able to see the payload in the RWB in the SOAP Sender channel.
    On further research, we noticed that the mappings migrated over from the PI 711 box to the PI 730 box are not working as designed as the contexts seem to be messed up. Hence, the sequence of execution is haywire and causing lot of errors. I am not sure if anyone else is facing similar issues.
    Thanks
    Sridhar

  • Veriable substitution issue in multimapping

    Hi Experts,
    I am working on the requirement where i need to create multiple flat files using multimapping for this. I am working on SAP PI 7.31 SP07, using SFTP adapter and messagetransformbean to create flat files.
    I am going for the variable substitution option as i want file name should be dynamic.(considering limitation of ASMA and dynamic configuration in
    multimapping)
    Getting the error "The variable substitution cannot be parse the message xml: Content is not allowed in prolog"
    Variable name- var1 reference- payload:NotificationAttachments,1,DocumentDetails,1,IncidentNumber,1
    Output struture-
    NotificationAttachments(1)
         ->DocumentDetails(0-n)
                   ->IncidentNumber(1)
                   ->DocNumber(1)
                   ->DocDescription(1)
                   ->Path(1)
    Please note one file can have multiple DocumentDetails.
    When i use reference for header data i.e. message:interface_name this works fine, but i want ot use IncidentNumber in file name from the payload.
    Can some one tell me is there something wrong on configuration, or there is some limitation here.
    Appreciate quick help.
    Thanks,
    Sandip

    Hello,
    May be u can check ur xpath? BTW, few days back i have seen a similar thread hope it's not somekind of bug (will cross check the same once i reach office)
    Variable Substitution in Receiver File Channel. PI 7.3
    Thanks
    Amit Srivastava

  • Multimapping n:1 (XML to IDOC) Issue - Cannot use map in the scenario

    Hi! I have created a multimapping in the directory. Source message is 0...unbounded and destination message is 1. The intention is to bring a single file into XI that contains mutliple XML messages. I then need to map this into a single IDOC. I have the mapping working. However, when I try and bring this into my integration scenario, XI cannot find the message interface.
    I am not 100% convinced that this will all hang together =) But Cannot even prove that 'cos I cannot set this up in the scenario.
    Any ideas would be greatly appreciate and rewarded.
    Thx
    Duncan

    Apologies for getting all my terminology screwed up. Here is what I have:
    <u>Integration Repository</u>
    Imported Objects - Target IDOC
    Interface Objects : External Definitions - XML schema of source message
    Interface Objects : Message Interface - For source XML; Outbound + Asynch
    Message Objects : Message Mapping - XML (0..unbounded) to IDOC (1) map
    Message Objects : Interface Mapping - XML message interface (0..unbounded) -> XML to IDOC mapping -> IDOC (1)
    <u>Integration Directory</u>
    Interface Determination...
    I select Type of Interface Determination = Extended but when I pull down the dropdown I do not see the multimap.
    I have this working OK for one IDOC to multiple XML messages, doing the same as above. I have checked SCV, namespace etc... and they are correct. I am sure I am missing something very simple.
    Again, any ideas appreciated.
    Thx
    Duncan

  • Multimapping(File to RFC) using BPM...issue!!!

    Hi
    Am working on following scenario:
    #Two request files merged to map to RFC request ( 2:1mapping )
    RFC response is split into two response messages( 1:2 ).
    I have done the whole thing in BPM that looks somewhat like this :
    Fork(Rec1 , Rec2)-> Transformation1(2:1 map) -> Send(Synchronous BAPI call) -> transformation(1:2 map) -> send(Response 1) -> send(Response 2)
    1st part i.e File Merge(2:1) works fine and the request is formed as desired. Next step when synchronous call is made to the RFC the response recieved is where i am facing issues. I dont get the expected response and eventually the following steps fail.
    When tested the same RFC(BAPI_SALESORDER_SIMULATE ) in tx SE37 with same data it works fine.
    But when same data is sent from XI it returns a error message in place of the response.
    Error Message states "Please enter SoldToParty or ShipToParty Number" .
    Irony is sold-to-party is sent in the request message and can be seen in payload in monitoring.
    Any kinda help is appreciated !!!

    > 1. Make sure that bapi commits...there will be a check box option in RFC receiver CC side for this.
    >2. Make sure that Sold to party/bill to party field is of 10 char before passing it to SAP.
    @ Santosh :
    I checked the tab in CC but still the same issue...Do we need to add something to the Name/Value section below that?
    And yeah I am sending 10 digits only..
    BTW do we need something additional when we call a BAPI from XI apart from the data we normally use in  tx SE37.
    Can my Configuration be a problem?
    For this synchronous call in BPM I have created :
    a) 2 interface determinations...One from BPM to ECC and another from ECC to BPM. But both are without any operation mapping as the message types are same & both are synchronous...
    b) 1 receiver determination i.e : from BPM to ECC.
    c) 1 receiver agreement.

  • Usage of Variable Transport Binding(Receiver SOAP adapter) in multimapping

    Hi All,
    Mentioned below is the flow of the scenario that I am facing issues with:
    ECC -> PI (A) -> PI (B) - Receivers(1,2,3..n)
    I am working on PI(A).
    An Idoc containing multiple Plants is triggered which is mapped to an XML in PI(A).
    Depending on the number of Plants in the Idocs, that many XMLs are created in PI(A) using multimapping.
    These XMLs are then sent to PI(B) which would route it to different receivers.
    But PI(A) should send the party name to PI(B) for routing.
    For this I am using dynamic configuration. If there are 'N' party names based on 'N' plants, always the last part name is being sent to PI(B).
    Is it possible to send all the party names associated with each XML(/plant) without overriding?
    As mentioned in the below table, an Idoc is triggered with 3 Plants. 3 XMLs are generated each for a different party. But only the last party i.e. C is being sent to PI(B) using dynamic configuration overriding A and B.
    Plant
    Party Name
    Output
    1
    A
    2
    B
    3
    C
    C
    Please help me to resolve this issue.
    Regards,
    Vishal

    Hello,
    DC is not supported in multimapping.
    But, where exactly u want to send the party name? In the xml file u want that party name to be there?
    If yes, then there are 2 options either use AM as shown below or u can use variable substitution (search SDN u will find quite a few blogs/wiki on the same)
    A new approach: Multi-mapping Dynamic Configuration using a generic custom module
    Thanks
    Amit Srivastava

  • RFC Look Up with MultiMapping in PI 7.1

    Hi All,
    I have created a multimapping with one source & two target messages. I am using a RFC look Up for one of fields inside mapping.
    But, when I used this multimapping in interface determination in PI 7.1, at runtime i got an error.
    Error - is variable (Say XYZ) used while creating parameter for RFC look Up in message mapping doesn't exist.
    If I execute multimapping without RFC look Up, it worked absolutely fine.
    I have used RFC look Up in number of normal message mappings, it worked fine.
    Not sure, if this is a issue with PI 7.1, that multi-mapping with RFC look Up isn't supported at enhanced interface determination.
    Please provide inputs for this or if anybody has hands on experience using this with PI 7.1
    Thanks,
    Venkat

    Hi,
    Please go through the thread:
    Re: Global Variables declaration in PI 7.1
    and check whether its useful.
    Regards,
    Vineetha.

  • Issue in Adapter Module

    Hi Experts,
    I have written an Adapter module to set the target file name (because it could not be done with usual DynamicConfig in mapping because of multimapping). I am facing a peculiar issue with it. For ex: I have 3 msgs. First msg started executing the module to set the target fillename and about to end the module execution. Meanwhile second msg enters the module execution and changes the file name. This is resulting in first msg to post a file with name set by second msg. I have put "Maintain order at runtime" in interface determination of ID to fix the issue. But this isssue is still persisting. Please let me know, how can a msg acquire a lock on the module and untill it finishes it execution, no other msg should start the module execution.
    Thanks,
    Rakesh

    Hi Michal,
    I have written below code to name the \target file in module code. I have also set "Adapter specific msg attributes" in receiver file adapter and referred file name from dynamic config:
    public ModuleData process(ModuleContext inputModuleContext, ModuleData inputModuleData)
         throws ModuleException {
                   Object obj = null;
                   Message msg = null;
                   AuditAccess audit = null;
                   MessageKey keyOut = null;
                   obj = inputModuleData.getPrincipalData();
                   msg = (Message) obj;
                   keyOut = new MessageKey(msg.getMessageId(),msg.getMessageDirection());
                   try
                        audit = PublicAPIAccessFactory.getPublicAPIAccess().getAuditAccess();     
                        audit.addAuditLogEntry(keyOut, AuditLogStatus.SUCCESS, "Module Started Execution..");
                        MessagePropertyKey mpk = new MessagePropertyKey("FileName","http://sap.com/xi/XI/System/File");
                        InputStream is = msg.getDocument().getInputStream();
                        DocumentBuilderFactory docBuilderFact = DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance();
                        DocumentBuilder docBuilder      = docBuilderFact.newDocumentBuilder();
                        Document doc = docBuilder.parse(is);
                        Node nl = (Node) doc.getDocumentElement();
                        Node n = nl.getFirstChild();
                        Attr a = (Attr) n.getAttributes().item(0);
                        String Num = a.getValue();
                        audit.addAuditLogEntry(keyOut, AuditLogStatus.SUCCESS, "Number is "+Num);
                        Attr a1,a2;
                        if (n.getNodeName().equalsIgnoreCase("Create"))
                             a1 = (Attr) n.getAttributes().item(1);
                             String sd = a1.getValue();
                             audit.addAuditLogEntry(keyOut, AuditLogStatus.SUCCESS, "Start Date is "+sd);
                             String fileName = sd + "-" + Num + ".xml";
                             msg.setMessageProperty(mpk,fileName);
                        else(n.getNodeName().equalsIgnoreCase("Update"))
                             a2 = (Attr) n.getAttributes().item(2);
                             String sd = a2.getValue();
                             audit.addAuditLogEntry(keyOut, AuditLogStatus.SUCCESS, "Start Date is "+sd);
                             String fileName = sd + "-" + Num + ".xml" ;
                             msg.setMessageProperty(mpk,fileName);
                   catch(Exception e)
                        audit.addAuditLogEntry(keyOut, AuditLogStatus.ERROR, "Execption Occured.." + e);
                   return inputModuleData;
    When 3 msgs get created for Create interface, File name set by first msg is being changed by second and file for first msg is posted with name set by second (because second msg has changed the target file in module code by that time )

  • Mapping issue, how to create properly data

    Hi All,
    I have a multiple IDOCs to FILE scenario, and I'm having issues with mapping data.
    Please take a look at this:
    IDOC structure:
    <IDOCNAME> (0..unbounded)
       <IDOC> (1..1)
          <SOURCESEGMENT1> (0..unbounded)
             <SOURCEFIELD1> (0..1)
             <SOURCESEGMENT2> (0..unbounded)
                <SOURCEFIELD2> (0..1)
    Target structure:
    <Recordset> (1..unbounded)
       <targetsegment> (1..unbounded)
          <targetfield> (1..1)
    Each Recordset will be create for each incoming IDOC. So, if there are 5 incoming IDOCs, then 5 Recordset will be created.
    Each targetsegment will be created if SOURCEFIELD2 = "1". So, if 1 IDOC contains 3 sourcefield2 with values 1, 2, 1, then it will need to be created twice.
    The targetfield will have corresponding value of SOURCEFIELD1when SOURCEFIELD2 = "1". So, if for sourcefield2 values 1, 2, 1 we got sourcefield values A, B, C then we will have A and C created.
    My issue is in the targetfield. I am not able to generate corresponding values.
    My actual map is
    IDOCNAME --> Recordset
    if SOURCEFIELD2 (IDOC context) = "1" --> CREATE targetsegment
    For targetfield, how can I generate the right values I need?

    The problem is with the context handling at the parent and child level.
    The parent level: targetsegment is mapped with the source field context set at IDoc level: so all the values 1,2,1 at ifwithoutelse input are within same context. now after the condition check, if you see the output (Display queue) of ifwithoutelse (I have a feel you have used this function) function, you will see the queue has two values true, true. The entry for the second context (2) would be missing. While the entry for the targetfield level will have all three values from SOURCEFIELD1. So there is a queue mismatch.
    At the parent level use:
    SOURCEFIELD2(context at IDoc level) -> Equals (=1)->CreateIf->targetsegment
    SOURCEFIELD1(default context)->targetfield
    This should work.
    Though I dont understand one thing, how the 0..unbounded occurance at the IDoc name level would work for Idoc collection! Even if you receive multiple IDocs of same idoc type, the multiple occurance for each idoc would be at <IDOC> level, which should be 1..Onbounded. For receiver IDoc multimapping this is the case.
    I really doubt if multimapping at <IDocName> level works with IDoc!
    Hope this works.
    Regards,
    Suddha

  • New DVR Issues (First Run, Channel Switching, etc.)

    I've spent the last 30 minutes trying to find answers through the search with no luck, so sorry if I missed something.
    I recently switched to FIOS from RCN cable in New York.  I've gone through trying to setup my DVR and am running into issues and was hoping for some answers.
    1.  I setup two programs to record at 8PM, I was watching another channel at the time and only half paying attention.  Around 8:02 I noticed a message had popped up asking if I would like to switch channels to start recording.  I was expecting it to force it to switch like my old DVR, but in this case it didn't switch and I missed the first two minutes of one of the shows.  I typically leave my DVR on all day and just turn off the TV, this dual show handling will cause issues with that if I forget to turn off the DVR.  Is there a setting I can change that will force the DVR to choose one of the recording channels?
    2.  I setup all my recordings for "First Run" because I only want to see the new episodes.  One show I setup was The Daily Show on comedy central, which is shown weeknights at 11pm and repeated 3-4 times throughout the day.  My scheduled recordings is showing all these as planned recordings even though only the 11pm show is really "new".  Most of the shows I've setup are once a week so they aren't a problem, but this seems like it will quickly fill my DVR.  Any fixes?
    Thanks for the help.
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    I came from RCN about a year ago.  Fios is different in several ways, not all of them desirable.  Here are several ways to get--and fix--unwanted recordings from a series recording setup.
    Some general principles. 
    Saving changes.  When you originally create a series with options, or if you go back to edit the options for an existing series, You MUST save the Series Options changes.  Pretty much everywhere else in the user interface, when you change an option, the change takes effect immediately--but not in Series Options.  Look at the Series Options window.  Look at the far right side.  There is a vertical "Save" bar, which you must navigate to and click OK on to actually save your changes.  Exiting the Series Options window without having first saved your changes loses all your attempted changes--immediately.
    Default Series Options.  This is accessed  from [Menu]--DVR--Settings--Default Series Options.  This will bring up the series options that will automatically be applied to the creation of a NEW series. The options for every previously created series will not be affected by a subsequent modification of the Default Series Options.  You should set these options to the way you would like them to be for the majority of series recordings that you are likely to create.  Be sure to SAVE your changes.  This is what you will get when you select "Create Series Recording" from the Guide.  When creating a new series recording where you think that you may want options different from the default, select "Create Series with Options" instead.  Series Options can always be changed for any individual series set up later--but not for all series at once.
    Non-series recordings.  With Fios you have no directly available options for these.  With RCN and most other DVRs, you can change the start and end times for individual episodes, including individual episodes that are also in a series.  With Fios, your workarounds are to create a series with options for a single program, then delete the series later;  change the series options if the program is already in a series, then undo the changes you made to the series options later; or schedule recordings of the preceding and/or following shows as needed.
    And now, to the unwanted repeats. 
    First, make sure your series options for the specific series in question--and not just the series default options--include "First Run Only".  If not, fix that and SAVE.  Then check you results by viewing the current options using the Series Manager app under the DVR menu.
    Second, and most annoying, the Guide can have repeat programs on your channel tagged as "New".  It happens.  Set the series option "Air Time" to "Selected Time".  To make this work correctly, you must have set up the original series recording after selecting the program in the Guide at the exact time of a first run showing (11pm, in your case), and not on a repeat entry in the Guide.  Then, even it The Daily Show is tagged as New for repeat showings, these will be ignored. 
    Third, another channel may air reruns of the program in your series recording, and the first showing of a rerun episode on the other channel may be tagged as "New".  These can be ignored in your series if you set the series option "Channel" to "Selected Channel".  Related to this, if there is both an SD and HD channel broadcasting you series program, you will record them both if the series option "Duplicates" is set to "Yes".  However, when the Channel option is set to "Selected Channel", the Duplicates Option is always effectively "No", regardless of what shows up on the options screen.  
    As for you missing two minutes,  I have sereral instances in which two programs start recording at the same time.  To the best of my recollection, whenever the warning message has appeared, ignoring it has not caused a loss of recording time.  You might have an older software version.  Newest is v.1.8.  Look at Menu--Settings--System Info.  Or, I might not have noticed the loss of minutes.  I regularly see up to a minute of previous programming at the start of a recording, or a few missing seconds at the beginning or end of a recording.  There are a lot of possibilities for that, but the DVR clock being incorrect is not one of them.  With RCN, the DVR clocks occasionally drifted off by as much as a minute and a half.

  • Pension issue Mid Month Leaving

    Dear All,
    As per rule sustem should deduct mid month joining/leaving/absences or transfer scenarios, the Pension/PF Basis will be correspondingly prorated. But our system is not doing this. In RT table i have found 3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00.
    Employee leaving date is 14.04.2010. system is picking pension amout as 541. Last year it was coming right.
    Please suggest.
    Ashwani

    Dear Jayanti,
    We required prorata basis pension in case of left employees and system is not doing this. This is the issue. As per our PF experts Pension amount should come on prorata basis for left employees in case they left mid of month.System is doing prorata basis last year but from this year it is deducting 541. I am giving two RT cases of different years.
    RT table for year 2010. DOL 26.04.2010
    /111 EPF Basis              01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /139 VPF Basis              01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3F1 Ee PF contribution     01/2010                    0.00           1,050.00 
    /3F3 Er PF contribution     01/2010                    0.00             509.00 
    /3F5 Ee Mon PF contribution 01/2010                    0.00           1,050.00 
    /3F6 Ee Ann PF contribution 01/2010                    0.00          12,600.00 
    /3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,00 01/2010                    0.00              96.25 
    /3FA PF basis for Ee contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00 
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00 
    /3F4 Er Pension contributio 01/2010                    0.00             541.00
    /3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    /3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
    /3R3 Metro HRA Basis Amount 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    1BAS Basic Salary           01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
    RT table for year 2009. DOL 27.10.2009
                                                                                    /111 EPF Basis              07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
    /139 VPF Basis              07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
    /3F1 Ee PF contribution     07/2009                    0.00           1,082.00
    /3F3 Er PF contribution     07/2009                    0.00             628.00
    /3F5 Ee Mon PF contribution 07/2009                    0.00           1,082.00
    /3F6 Ee Ann PF contribution 07/2009                    0.00           8,822.00
    /3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,00 07/2009                    0.00              99.18
    /3FA PF basis for Ee contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00
    /3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00 
    /3FC Pension Basis for Er c 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00 
    /3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00 
    /3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00 
    /3R4 Non-metro HRA Basis Am 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13 
    1BAS Basic Salary           07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13 
    Now please suggest what to do. where is the problem  ? If have also checked EXIT_HINCALC0_002 but nothing written in it.
    With Regards
    Ashwani

  • Open PO Analysis - BW report issue

    Hello Friends
    I constructed a query in BW in order to show Open Purchase Orders. We have custom DSO populated with standard
    datasource 2lis_02_itm (Purcahse Order Item). In this DSO we mapped the field ELIKZ to the infoobject 0COMP_DEL
    (Delivery completed).
    We loaded the data from ECC system for all POs and found the following issue for Stock Transport Purchase orders (DocType = UB).
    We have a PO with 4 line items. For line items 10 and 20, Goods issued, Goods received and both the flags "Delivery
    complete" and "Final delivery" checked. For line items 30 and 40, only delivery indicator note is issued for zero
    quantity and Delivery complete flag is checked (Final delivery flag is not checked) in ECC system. For this PO, the
    delivery completion indicator is not properly updated in the DSO for line items 30 and 40. The data looks like the
    following:
    DOC_NUM     DOC_ITEM       DOCTYPE     COMP_DEL
    650000001       10     UB        X
    650000001       20     UB        X
    650000001       30     UB
    650000001       40     UB      
    When we run the Open PO analysis report on BW side this PO is appearing in the report but the same is closed in ECC
    system.
    Any help is appreciated in this regard.
    Thanks and Regards
    sampath

    Hi Priya and Reddy
       Thanks for your response.
                         Yes the indicator is checked in EKPO table for items 30 and 40 and delta is running regularly for more than 1 year and no issues with other POs. This is happening only for few POs of type Stock Transport (UB).
                        I already checked the changes in ME23N and the Delivery completed indicator was changed and it reflected in EKPO table. Further, i checked the PSA records for this PO and i am getting the records with the Delivery completed flag but when i update from PSA to DSO the delivery completed indicator is not updating properly.
                       In PSA, for item 30 i have the following entries. Record number 42 is capturing the value X for ELIKZ but after that i am getting two more records 43 and 44 with process key 10 and without X for ELIKZ. I think this is causing the problem.
    Record No.    Doc.No.                    Item              Processkey         Rocancel     Elikz
        41               6500000001            30                    11                            X           ---    
        42               6500000001            30                    11                            ---           X
        43               6500000001            30                    10                            X           ---
        44               6500000001            30                    10                            ---         ---
    (Here --- means blank)        
    Thanks and Regards
    sampath

  • HP LaserJet Enterprise 600 M602 driver issue

    Hello,
    I've got issue with 600-series printers. We use the latest UPD drivrer ver. 61.175.1.18849 and print from XenApp 6.5. The error occurs every time when users try to print jpg files from XenApp session. It only happens with 600 series printers and UPD.
    Also I've tried to assign native 600-series driver ver. 6.3.9600.16384 and it works good. But with that driver system says that it's color printer and it brokes our printing reports. These reports are very important for us. So we can't use printer and that driver as well.
    Printer installed on Windows Server 2012 R2. All clients are Windows 7 x64. XenApp Servers are Server 2008R2.
    Is it possible to get fixed UPD driver or correct native driver for Server 2012 R2?
    Regards,
    Anatoly

    I am sorry, but to get your issue more exposure I would suggest posting it in the commercial forums since this is a commercial printer. You can do this at Printers - LaserJet.
    Click on New Post.
    I hope this helps.
    Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
    Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!
    Gemini02
    I work on behalf of HP

  • Windows 7 displays error message when exiting +cursor issue

    Two issues here. CS5 Phoshop on Wind 7 64 bit.
    Physical processor count: 8
    Processor speed: 3073 MHz
    Built-in memory: 12279 MB
    Free memory: 9577 MB
    Memory available to Photoshop: 10934 MB
    Memory used by Photoshop: 80 %
    Image tile size: 128K
    First issue is since the latest automatic Adobe update (why fix what isn't broken?) Every time I now exit Photoshop I get the message "Adobe QT Server has stoped working" and occasionally it happens when I exit bridge. Indesign is also behaving badly. I can no longer start a previous document from file manager without ID crashing out.
    The other is the cursors in Clone and erase lose their edge (become invisable) for no reason - well not quite. Noise Ninja crashed Photoshop when I tried to use it. I reinstalled it and all is well. The cursor issue seems to be intermittant but came back (for no reason) after I reinstalled NN. I can't seem to change the cursor, no matter what I do. The problem is now seriously affecting how I work. Almost enough to go back to Win XP which ran CS5 Photoshop flawlessly.
    Any help will be gratefully accepted.
    Doug

    function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
    doug87510 wrote:
    The recent problem is the entire outline of the cursor (including the crosshair in the middle) was missing at any size of cursor. All I had was exactly what I'd get if I used a real spraygun.
    Well, that issue is simply a matter of hitting the Caps Lock key.  When Caps Lock is on, you'll see the cursor outline, and when it is off you'll see a crosshair.  That's a feature, not a bug.
    Glad to hear the 11.1 drivers are out.  I will download them and try them now myself.
    Regarding "Adobe QT" crashing...  QT brings to mind QuickTime, though that is Apple, not Adobe.  Do you have Apple QuickTime installed?
    Regarding memory usage, with 12 GB of installed RAM, you should be able to set Photoshop to use 90% or more in Edit - Preferences - Performance.
    -Noel

Maybe you are looking for

  • Creation of Sales order through inbound idoc

    Hi, I'm using two servers 100 and 200.In 100 i'm creating outbound IDOC for PO,In 200 sales order has to be created for that PO.I'm facing some problem in server 200. Error i'm facing  : Partner profile not available. I done all the basic setting lik

  • Java.sql.SQLException in the Buss. Comp. Proj. WIZARD...why?

    hi, I'm getting a java.sql.SQLException in the Bussiness Component Project Wizard. I made the connection using "Oracle JDBC Thin" and the connection works fine, then I click next to give the package name and when I click next again, I get the java.sq

  • Availability issue

    Hi! Gurus.. I am creating a sales order. MMBE shows stock for that material. but order doesnt confirm any qty [checked CO09] . it doesnt matter how far i push back the delivery date. what cud be the reason? we have batch management active. might it b

  • Photos from iPhoto are only partially displayed

    Trying to create a slideshow of photos from an Album in iPhoto '08. No need for other layout elements, just want the photos. When I drag a photo from the iPhoto Album into Keynote, it appears as a new slide (using light table view) as expected. But o

  • Bizarre Stage Size Issue

    Hello All, I am experiencing a rather bizarre issue. First let me say that I consider myself an experienced designer and am running Master collection CS4. (Yes I am ashamed that I don't have CS5 yet .) Here's the issue: I designed a web page in Photo