Multiple account assignment (auto) - not split valuation

Hi
I have a requirement to make postings to two G/L accounts (automatically) via material group. Does anyone know if this is possible either using material group and val class or PO pricing conditions (without increasing the value of the PO)?? This is not a split valuation requirement, since the amounts being posted should not be split, but should be the full value of the PO (the g/l accounts being posted to are statistical).
Regards
Pratap

I  found the answer

Similar Messages

  • 'BAPI_PO_CREATE1'  Multiple account assignment is not possible for AFS item

    'BAPI_PO_CREATE1'  -> This BAPI works perfectly without the  'account assignment' option . But  for purchase requisitions which have account assignments  BAPI returns the error  - E|8W |185   |Multiple account assignment is not possible for AFS items.
    Can somebody please help me to get this error resoleve .
    My coding I have done like below.
    DATA: pohead  TYPE bapimepoheader.
    DATA: poheadx TYPE bapimepoheaderx.
    CONSTANTS : c_x VALUE 'X'.
    DATA: exp_head TYPE bapimepoheader.
    DATA: return  TYPE TABLE OF bapiret2 WITH HEADER LINE.
    DATA: poitem  TYPE TABLE OF bapimepoitem WITH HEADER LINE.
    DATA: poitemx TYPE TABLE OF bapimepoitemx WITH HEADER LINE.
    DATA: posched  TYPE TABLE OF bapimeposchedule WITH HEADER LINE.
    DATA: poschedx TYPE TABLE OF bapimeposchedulx WITH HEADER LINE.
    DATA: POACCOUNT  TYPE TABLE OF BAPIMEPOACCOUNT WITH HEADER LINE.
    DATA: POACCOUNTX TYPE TABLE OF BAPIMEPOACCOUNTx WITH HEADER LINE.
      pohead-comp_code = '1000'.   "IEQ1 plant. "'1000'.
      pohead-doc_type   = 'NB'     .
      pohead-creat_date = sy-datum   .
      pohead-vendor = EKKO-LIFNR. "'0000500004'.
      pohead-purch_org = purch_org.
      pohead-pur_group = purch_grp.
      pohead-langu      = sy-langu   .
      pohead-doc_date   = sy-datum.
      poheadx-comp_code  = c_x.
      poheadx-doc_type   = c_x.
      poheadx-creat_date = c_x.
      poheadx-vendor     = c_x.
      poheadx-langu      = c_x.
      poheadx-purch_org  = c_x.
      poheadx-pur_group  = c_x.
      poheadx-doc_date   = c_x.
      poitem-po_item    = iLineItem.      "1.
      poitem-material   = req_item-MATERIAL.   " '000000000040000234'.
      poitem-plant      = req_item-PLANT.
      poitem-quantity   = req_item-QUANTITY.
      poitem-net_price  = NET_PRICE.
      poitem-price_unit = PRICE_UNIT.
      poitem-shipping   = 'Z1'.
      poitem-preq_no    = req_item-PREQ_NO.
      poitem-preq_item  = req_item-PREQ_ITEM.
      poitem-acctasscat = 'K'.
      APPEND poitem.
      poitemx-po_item    = iLineItem. "1.
      poitemx-po_itemx   = c_x.
      poitemx-material   = c_x.
      poitemx-plant      = c_x .
      poitemx-quantity   = c_x .
      poitemx-tax_code   = c_x .
      poitemx-item_cat   = c_x .
      poitemx-acctasscat = c_x .
      poitemx-net_price  = c_x.
      poitemx-price_unit = c_x.
      poitemx-shipping   = c_x.
      poitemx-preq_no    = c_x.
      poitemx-preq_item  = c_x.
      poitemx-acctasscat = c_x.
      APPEND poitemx.
      POACCOUNT-PO_ITEM = iLineItem.
      POACCOUNT-SERIAL_NO = iLineItem.
      POACCOUNT-GL_ACCOUNT = '0000211010'.
      POACCOUNT-SD_DOC = '0001001056'.       
      POACCOUNT-ITM_NUMBER = '000100'.       
      POACCOUNT-CO_AREA = '1000'.
      APPEND POACCOUNT.
      POACCOUNTX-PO_ITEM = '00001'.
      POACCOUNTX-SERIAL_NO = '01'." '01'.
      POACCOUNTX-PO_ITEMX = 'X'.
      POACCOUNTX-SERIAL_NOX = 'X'.
      POACCOUNTX-GL_ACCOUNT = 'X'.
      POACCOUNTX-SD_DOC = 'X'.
      POACCOUNTX-ITM_NUMBER = 'X'.
      APPEND POACCOUNTX.
      CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_PO_CREATE1'
        EXPORTING
          poheader  = pohead
          poheaderx = poheadx
        IMPORTING
        exppurchaseorder = ex_po_number
        expheader        = exp_head
        TABLES
          return    = return
          poitem    = poitem
          poitemx   = poitemx
          POACCOUNT = POACCOUNT
          POACCOUNTX = POACCOUNTX.

    I  found the answer

  • Multiple account assignment for limited PO

    Hi experts,
    Currently need to create a limit PO (item category B) with acct assignment category (P project).
    however, i need to maintain 2 project codes under the "WBS element" field.
    using limit PO, i can only maintain 1 project code.
    Appreciate if anyone can advise where can i configure (or is it possible) to have such implementation for PO creation. Thanks.
    Regards,
    JL

    Hi
    I have also checked that multiple account assignment is not possible for Limit PO's ( Item category B)
    But You can post to Multiple Account assignment objects at the time of Invoice Verification.
    Thanks & Regards
    Kishore

  • Multiple account assignment of p.r while acct. assignment is P & itemcat-D

    I AM FACING A PROBLEM IN CREATION OF P.R HAVING MULTIPLE ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT . I AM TAKING ACCT. ASSIGN MENT CAT- P i am distubting in different WBS ELEMENT. BUT SYSTEM GIVES AN ERROR MESSAGE
    Multi acct. assgt. not allowed for ind. cust. req. or engineer-to-order
    Message no. 06268
    Diagnosis
    Multiple account assignment is not defined for items with account assignment to "individual customer requirement" or "manufacture for individual project" (engineer-to-order).
    This means that you can only enter one account assignment item in the case of individual customer requirement or engineer-to-order.

    pls go to spro-mm-purchasing- account assignment-maintain account assignment-select the account assignment u r using-check ID: AcctAssgt Scrn.
    regards,
    indranil

  • Valuated GR not allowed in case of multiple account assignment

    Hi Friends,
    While creating Asset PO with multiple account assignment categories from SC
    i received the following error message in RZ20.
    PO 0030065837: No instance of object type PurchaseOrder has been created. External reference:
    PurchOrder 0030065837: Purchase order still contains faulty items
    PO 0030065837: Valuated GR not allowed in case of multiple accoun t assignment
    PurchOrder 0030065837: Transfer failed
    Now the PO status is error in process
    Can any one help on this issue...
    Thank You
    Shrinivas

    Hi shrinivas,
    When you are having the multiple account assignment, then the system will force you to have GR-non valuated indicator being flagged which results in the fact there is not any FI document at GR posting stage and this is the standard feature of SAP
    can you tell me whether you have that option of selecting or deselecting the GR nonvaluated in PO creation(EBP).If it is there falg it and reprocess the Sc
    hope this will help
    regards
    subbu

  • Multiple account assignment with non valuated gr

    hi,
    For multiple account assignement - One PO - MORE THAN ONE ASSETS - the GRN becomes "non valuated " (automatically- the field is grayed out). The account document will not be generated. The asset value will be captured on the MIRO date.
    pls explain why system behave like this?
    regards
    sumit simran

    Hi,
    Yes for asset GRN always non-valuated
    check following sap not also
    Note 9175 - No value update is performed for goods movements
    check setting of OMS9 for asset A you will get clear idea
    check following link also
    [Asset PO;
    Regards
    Kailas Ugale

  • Valuated GR with Multiple Account Assignment

    Hi SAP Experts!
    I would want to know the logic behind always using a Non-valuated GRs with Multiple Account Assignments.
    I am asking this because we would want to make use of the budget checking during GRs. More specifically, whenever there is a GR, the committed budget will move to the actual budget. In our business practice, more often than not, the invoice is entered much later than the GR. This would mean that the amount of the purchase will remain in the committed state even if the goods have already been received.
    Is there a way to work around this in SAP? Or is this the only way that it does this?
    Hope to hear from you guys soon. Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    I am sorry but the basic process is that you cannopt have a valuated receipt for a line with multiple account assignments.
    An alternative (albeit a not very good one) is to just use separate lines on the PO instead of multiple account assignment.
    this may not be any help, but I doubt if there are any user-friendly alternatives.
    Steve B

  • GR can not printed for PO-Multiple account assignment on single line item ,

    Hi!
    I made a pr with single line item with 3 account assignment on percentage basis.I created a PO against .GR non valuated was automatically ticked so no account assignment was created at the time of GR posting.
    Can I make a valuted GR against PO line item with multiple account assignment.
    I faced another problem .I displayed the GR and after ticking out put check box in the general data page of the GR doc. the output is being saved but  the update is terminated immediately.and no output page is generated in this item level.This output problem is not there at the time of single account assignment at PO line item.
    Can you please let me have the solution ?
    Thank snd regards,
    Suranjana

    > I made a pr with single line item with 3 account assignment on percentage basis.I created a PO against .GR non valuated was automatically ticked so no account assignment was created at the time of GR posting.
    When you are having the multiple account assignment, then the system will force you to have GR-non valuated indicator being flagged which results in the fact there is not any FI document at GR posting stage and this is the standard feature of SAP.
    > Can I make a valuted GR against PO line item with multiple account assignment.
    No, not at all. The disability of GR indicator can be set in OME9 with account assignment category
    > I faced another problem .I displayed the GR and after ticking out put check box in the general data page of the GR doc. the output is being saved but  the update is terminated immediately.and no output page is generated in this item level.This output problem is not there at the time of single account assignment at PO line item.
    In fact, it is possible to maintain multiple account assignment for each and every PO line item by selecting the 'Multiple Account Assignment' button in the 'Account Assignment' View of the Item Detail of PO. However, for such multiple account assignment selection, no accounting document will be generated upon GR maintenance. This can only be done during IR via LIV process.

  • GR Non-Valuated  with multiple account assignment

    Hi, gurus;
    some knows a user exit or badi that is used to undercheck the flag GR Non-valuated when PO with multiple account assignment is created (ME21N) ? It can have some consequence in later invoice verification?
    Thanks in advance
    R.Z.

    gr non valuated is done in case ur procuring the material for direct consumption so at the time of gr no posting to accounts occur but at the time of invoice recipet the system debits the g/l account and crdits the vendor account 
    this multiple account ***. is also necessary to mark with gr non valuated and gr check box so that u can change the account assignment at the time of invoice and that acc. assg. should also be changebale in backend .

  • Multiple account assignment switching between distribution indicators not working for service

    Hi Gurus,
    Account assignment distribution function not working post ECC6 patching activity
    we have recently completed ECC6 patching actvity and we are facing issues on processing multiple account assignment in service.
    we create Purhcase order with single account assignment and will process service with Multiple account assignment selecting distribution on qty or percentage basis till patching functionality works fine post patching we are facing issue when we are selecting distribution indicator system provides an error message switching between distribution indicator is not allowed when we continue system ask to enter in case of multiple account assignment select the distribution indicator. could you please suggest me on the issue.
    Thanks in advance.

    we have found a SAP note
    1915000 - SE685 - Switching between distribution indicators is not allowed
    This is now standard behavior.

  • GR and GR Non Val indicator in R/3 PO for multiple account assigned SC's

    Hi,
    We are on SRM 3.0(EBP 4.0) and R/3 4.7.
    We have implemented the BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK badi for setting or clearing the GR and IR indicators under certian conditions.
    But for Multiple account assigned SC's we get an error message "06181 With non-valuated GR, please also enter GR i ndicator ".
    We have tried implementing note# 872000, but this has not solved the issue.
    The PO's get created only if we force the GR indicator when transferring the data into R/3.
    It seems clear that while creating the PO the system is encountering the GR Non Val indicator but not the GR indicator, so its throwing the error message (we get the same error message when we create the PO from R/3 with GRnon val indicator checked and GR ind unchecked).
    The proposed solution is that in the same BADI, along with clearing the GR indicator, we will also clear the GR non val indicator.
    This can solve the issue if the indicators are transferred as it is from EBP.
    But can anyone tell me if these indicators are also checked/changed in any FM/program in R/3 before the PO is created?
    Is there any customizing setting which is affecting this particular behaviour?
    Regards,
    Srivatsan

    Hi Srivatsan ?
    In ECC, you have a configuration point :
    Materials Management->Account Assignment->Maintain Account Assignment Categories
    Here you can untick the indicator you want by account assignment category;
    Kind regards,
    Yann

  • Multiple account assignment for asset

    Hi,
    I had created PO with multiple account assignment for asset. PO is created with one line item having 5 qty and in multiple account assignment 5 assets are entered with qty distribution.
    I have issue with commitment distribution for all the account assignment. when i post migo(GR) the value is posting for only first one asset not for all.
    So in the purchase order for the remaining account assignment commitment remain left.
    Reagrds,
    Umesh
    Edited by: Umesh Agrawal on May 15, 2009 6:43 AM

    Hi,
    1st check in OME9 t.code for account assignment A, the selection of 2(Multiple account ***)in field ID: AcctAssgt Scrn and Distribution field as 1.
    Then during PO creation for single line item  & in Item details TAB, in account assignment segment, you enter qty with asset number (A1) with G/L account for 1st Line and for 2nd line keep  qty. with asset number(A1) with  G/L account ( different G/L Account) OR enter  qty with asset number (A1) with G/L account for 1st Line and for 2nd line keep  qty. with another asset number(A2) with  G/L account (different G/L Account)
    ####Example-1: in account assignment segment     , if you have
    G/L account----
    Asset
    12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A1
    12346u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A2
    12347u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A3
    12348u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A4
    Having a concept that GR is non-valuated and accounting entries in invoice (without tax) are:
    Vendor A/C: Cr
    G/L account (12345): Dr
    G/L account (12346): Dr
    G/L account (12347): Dr
    G/L account (12348 ):Dr
    #####Example-2: in account assignment segment     , if you have
    G/L account----
    Asset
    12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A1
    12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A2
    12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A3
    12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A4
    Having a concept that GR is non-valuated and accounting entries in invoice (without tax) are:
    Vendor A/C: Cr
    G/L account (12345): Dr
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Multiple Account assignment in PO cause no GR value

    HI,
    In PO, we have multiple account assignment, and thus the GR,Non-Valuated will be checked automatically. In this case, we can only have the financial posting have the invocie receipt time.
    We can have the correct financial posting, but will not the real time posting after GR before IR.
    Like we have GR, but after 2 months we shall have IR. Before we IR, we can not found any Financial posting for Goods receipt. Do we have any solution for this?
    Kerry Liu

    May i ask the reason why SAP can not do value GR for multi-accoutn assignment? As our Finance team to have financial posting when they have the good receipt, seemed it's hard to do if we use multi-account assignment? or any other better ways?

  • Invoice transport costs with multiple account assignment

    Hello Gurus,
    My problem is the following:
    1) I create two sales orders with the same forwarding agent "A"
    2) I create the two deliveries with the forwarding agent "A"
    3) I create a transport for those two deliveries and the same forwarding agent A
    4) I create the shipment cost for that transport.
    So now we have the situation:
    2 orders --> 2 deliveries --> 1 transport --> 1 shipment cost
    when i go to transaction MIRO and I enter the delivery note number I get one line item with the total transport cost.
    If I click on the option "Multiple account assignment" I get a breakdown of all the amounts but I can not see which costs refers to which delivery.
    My question is: Is there any way I can link the amount to the delivery number or at least to identify which cost is linked to which delivery number?
    Thanks a lot in advance,
    Miguel

    gr non valuated is done in case ur procuring the material for direct consumption so at the time of gr no posting to accounts occur but at the time of invoice recipet the system debits the g/l account and crdits the vendor account 
    this multiple account ***. is also necessary to mark with gr non valuated and gr check box so that u can change the account assignment at the time of invoice and that acc. assg. should also be changebale in backend .

  • PO with multiple account assignment

    Hi Experts,
    While creating PO for multiple account assignment system is automatically picking 'GR Non-Valuated' check box.After doing a GR no accouning document generated.
    How is the goods receipt valuated for a purchase order with multiple account assignment?
    Please explain.
    Thanks,
    Sanjana

    Hi,
    It is possible to create PO with multiple account assignment,but you will not get accounting document at the time of GR.it will happen at the time of MIRO,as i have allready explained.
    If you will create PO with multiple account assignment for Services,System will generate Accounting document at the time of GR.
    I hope it will clerify.
    Regards,
    Manish

Maybe you are looking for

  • Can I use the same taskflow in the same page ?

    I have an ADF library which I want to input into a single page (jspx). In the single page, i drag a taskflow-A twice into showdetailitem1 and showdetailitem2. I used required parameter so I able to define each taskflow. Everything looks good for the

  • Common class data for two session?

    JDEV 10.1.3.3, ADF I have the bean userState with the scope as session, in this bean-class i have the variable: public static List selectedItemsMonth; on page i put selectManyListbox component with fields: value="#{userState.selectedItemsMonth}" valu

  • InDesign table/textbox problem

    I have a table inside a textbox. Whenever I move the textbox to the lower left side of my document, a couple of the rows inside the document automatically split leaving an unwanted horizontal space in my table. Oddly, when I move the textbox (with a

  • My iPhone5 has stopped sending iMessages

    My iPhone5 has stopped sending iMessages and instead is sending all messages as texts. Why has this happened and how can I stop it happening?

  • Homeshare to Ipad and Iphone is very slow to load library

    First time poster, long time listener... I'm totally pro mac, from which I made the switch about 2 years ago from android and windows to everything mac and iPad/ iphone etc... One problem that I have been having is when on any of my IOS devices (2 iP