Multiple HTML instances

Hello all,
Can anyone tell me how can i make the server available on multiple ports?
The objective is the following:
I have 2 identical applications and i want them to be mapped on the same application server, but obviously to different ports.
Can any one guide thtough this?
Thanx.

Using virtual hosts
like
Listen 8888
<VirtualHost *:8888>
ServeName virtual1
Port 8888
DocumentRoot /path_to_index/
ErrorLog /path_to_log/
</VirtualHost>
And one of this for any port you want to use.
Greetings.

Similar Messages

Can there be multiple ASM instances on single node?

Hi,
Can there be multiple ASM instances on single node?
This one says No : http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/02-2008/msg00317.html
And This one says Yes : http://www.databasejournal.com/features/oracle/article.php/3571371
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Harsha
Edited by: user498756 on Sep 11, 2008 2:23 AM

...that document doesnt say you cannot have multiple ASM instances on a node. It says "...ASM, +you only need one ASM+ instance for that computer, to manage the two database instances that use ASM."
The fact that you only need one - and I cannot think of a good reason to have more than one - does not preclude the fact that you do seem to be able to have multiple ASM instances on a single node, each looking after its own set of disks and diskgroups.
Again - I cannot think of a good reason to do so though!
-Bob

How do you configure the DAM so it can be shared across multiple CQ instances?

How do you configure the DAM so it can be shared across multiple CQ instances?

You can use shared datastore http://dev.day.com/content/kb/home/Crx/CrxSystemAdministration/HowToCombineTheDatastoreToP reserveDiskSpace.html multiple CQ instance will use same file system to share asset
clustering http://dev.day.com/docs/en/crx/current/administering/cluster.html multiple node will share repository.
But you can not have something like one DAM and then have different CQ instance pointing to it (As not everything goes in to one location in file system)
Yogesh

Pros and Cons of Application Isolation/Multiple server instances?

Hi. I'm setting a new server using ColdFusion Enterprise with Apache to migrate several web application from and old server with ColdFusion 7 server. I'm currently doing research regarding multiple server instances in order to have a separate server for production apps and another for development apps (see http://help.adobe.com/en_US/ColdFusion/10.0/Admin/WSc3ff6d0ea77859461172e0811cbf363c31-7ff 5.html and https://wikidocs.adobe.com/wiki/display/coldfusionen/Using+Multiple+Server+Instanceshttp:/ /). In addition, I'm also doing research regarding application isolation to have separate production application in separate servers. I'm trying to identify all pros and cons for both "Application Isolation" and "Multiple Server Instances" to make a decision on whether I will proceed in applying these techniques. I have found several links that talk about some of the advantages but have not been able to find anything regarding possible disadvantages. Have anyone in this forum has used any of the techniques, and can provide more information/experiences regarding the pros and cons?

Hi Ricardo_Lorenzo,
Whether to go for Multiserver instances or Single server, is totally a user requirement based decison. If a user has Single website, or multiple websites (of the same nature, in terms of functionality), usually the part of same domain, then they would go for Single sever installation. One single instance will handle the requests from all the websites (if there are multiple). There would not be a clustering/failover setup within ColdFusion and can use the ColdFusion Standard or Enterprise version.
On the other hand, if a user has multiple websites, all with different functionality and have multiple applications (may or may not) running, then they can go for Multiserver installation. Each website can be configured with individual instances. Clustering can be done within ColdFusion if needed. One would need an Enterprise license of ColdFusion for the same.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Anit Kumar

Multiple Login in ATG on multiple server instances.

Hi,
I'm facing a issue with multiple logins in my web application. The scenario is explained below:
1. I login from one browser (IE) and add an item to cart. Then I navigate to cart page. I logout.
2. I login from another browser (Chrome) and add another item to cart. Now I have two items in my cart. I'm still logged in.
3. I login to IE again and it throws error saying ConcurrentUpadteException.
This is very obvious.
1. In first step the profile's order is picked up from repository and updates it version to '2' (suppose). This change is there still in the cache and not persisted in the DB. I logout. The order will get persisted only after 5 minutes, due to cache configuration.
2. Next in step 2 we get the same order from the repository and makes its version number to '2' also. I'm still logged in.
3. Now in step 3 when the order is again picked up from repository and updates the order version to '2'. Hence the ConcurrentUpdateException.
This is happening because I have multiple sever instances and the request can be handled by any of the server instance. Had there been only one server instance it would have only one cache, and order will be picked up from the same cache every time.
If I can invalidate the sessions across all the server instances I can resolve this issue. The problem is how can I do this. Is this possible by a making changes in the program or by changing any configuration.
Please give me suggestions on how to take it up from here.

Not sure what is the real issue you are facing. For resolving the concurrentUpdateException in order, ATG is suggesting some steps to follow while updating the order.
Check the below solution, you need to have a support id to access this article.
https://support.oracle.com/CSP/main/article?cmd=show&type=NOT&id=1362812.1
Regarding your second question, for invalidating the cache for multiple instances, ATG provides different Caching Modes, you may check the documentation.
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E23095_01/Platform.93/RepositoryGuide/html/s1003cachingmodes01.html
Cheers
R

Java client connecting to multiple weblogic instances

We have a standalone java client JMS application that needs to connect to multiple
Weblogic instances running in different domains.
The client works fine when we obtain an initial context to the multiple instances
without specifying a security principle and password. As soon as we add in this
information, we get problems: The initial context is still successfully retrieved
for each of the weblogic instances, but we cannot send JMS messages to destinations
on one of the Weblogic instances due to a security exception which states that
there is an 'Invalid Principal'.
Any advice would be appreciated.

You should first establish a trust relationship between your Weblogic
servers:
http://e-docs.bea.com/wls/docs70/secmanage/domain.html#1171534
It is very poorly documented since this is a change in the behavior with
previous versions and should have been in the Release Notes but instead
is inside the normal documentation.
--dejan
jonathan wrote:
Thanks Arvind, but both JVMs are the same (1.3.1) and there is no jsse stuff in
the classpath.
"Arvind Gudipati" <[email protected]> wrote:
check if yr client's jvm version is the same as server's jvm.. ive noticed
this problem a few times when i was using client jvm (1.4.x) connecting
to
server jvm (1.3.x).. also check if u have any jsse libraries in yr
classpath.. if so remove 'em
+arvind
"Jonathan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:3f2f9f19$[email protected]..
We have a standalone java client JMS application that needs to connect
to
multiple
Weblogic instances running in different domains.
The client works fine when we obtain an initial context to the multiple
instances
without specifying a security principle and password. As soon as we
add in
this
information, we get problems: The initial context is still successfully
retrieved
for each of the weblogic instances, but we cannot send JMS messages
to
destinations
on one of the Weblogic instances due to a security exception which
states
that
there is an 'Invalid Principal'.
Any advice would be appreciated.

Managing multiple Postfix instances on a single host

We have quite a few sites on our Xserve. Each site should be able to relay email out the respective unique IP on a single host; however, by default email goes out the default website of the server or which IP is the current gateway.
NOTE: this is not a Postfix Virtual Domain Hosting > mail forwarding domains issue. Mail routes just fine to the correct email boxes. This is and issue where email going out to other mail servers originates from the box and not the respective domains and IP space.
The solution for this is Multiple PostFix Instances. One for each website (each website has a respective IP due to SSL and DNS is correct along with MX records).
For the outbound mail relay for our corporate network it seems there are no fields to enable a new postfix instance for each hosted or virtually hosted domain. Nor is there a way to enable SMTP to relay outgoing mail through another host unless you use a generic setting for every website on the server.
So for a enterprise level business how do we Managing multiple Postfix instances on a single host?

Fully on the same page with you. 110%
Here is why I am under the impression of why each domain name needs to be as if it needs its own MTA (mail transfer agent). No matter how big or small the business.
Just like a domain using SSL in Apache needs a dedicated IP when doing the packets . . .
Yahoo the big dog (for small to medium online businesses 70% of their customers make purchases with Yahoo emails; which most of them are temp emails or known as aliases.) states:
From: help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/mail/postmaster/basics/postmaster-02.html
Many mail providers follow the same guidelines:
{quote}Segregate your lists to different IP addresses. If you maintain several lists (or clients, especially for an ASP), you may want to segregate your lists to ensure that users are marking each list on its own merits. If user sees both spam and legitimate mail from the same IP, their notifications to us will be hazy and will likely result in the spam overiding the legitimate mail.{quote}
So why not segregate websites to email out their own dedicated IPs?
Understandably sites that share IP space can go out the default MTA or better yet the MTA of that IP.
This way host providers can segment groups of clients and further prevent issues with out going email.
When email goes out a single MTA there are checks and rate limitations not just on the hops involved but from the "originating" IP address. So if site "A" has one IP and site "B" has another . . . well they both send email out the same default gateway. Take 100's of domains going out the same IP and customers (websites) start having issues getting customer communications delivered.
{quote}Maintain accurate reverse-DNS information for your mail servers. Yahoo! Mail makes extensive DNS checks for each connection, and an accurate reverse DNS will ensure prompt processing of your connection and email.{quote}
One mistake by one client out of 1,000 sites (or now Apple letting tens of thousands of sites able to be hosted) can get all 1,000 websites deferred and have what is called "reputation" issues.
In the past, as companies grow, sure they get more boxes or can cluster mail servers. With economic times beyond using Parallels . . . a single Mac Xserve can handle tens of thousands of websites doing a few thousand emails a day or more. It is more of a software/setting/configuration issue than just capability.
I remember Intel board meetings in the 90's where I (as a customer) stated put two nic cards on the mother board, standardize those rails, put twisted pair on those hard drive cables. Some things just take practical experience to see yes there is a real need and the business people are not getting it because they are focussing on the business or chasing their tail.
Also Note the IP address has to be STATIC:
From: help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/mail/postmaster/errors/550-bl21.html;ylt=AsNxnjlX971dwy743e7j.olJHdG
{quote}In our continuing efforts to protect our users from unsolicited email, Yahoo! Mail does not accept SMTP connections from dynamic or residential IP addresses . . .{quote}
From: help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/mail/postmaster/basics/postmaster-15.html
{quote}Segregate your mail streams by IP addresses, domains and/or DKIM selectors since Yahoo! Mail keeps reputation data about each IP address and domain you send from. For example, by segmenting the mail stream that delivers marketing mail from another that sends transactional messages, you make it easier for Yahoo! Mail to determine and assign each mail stream's reputation. {quote}
{quote} Use common-sense settings. While we have not published guidelines for numbers of connections you can concurrently use, we ask that you treat our resources with respect. The more you take, the fewer there are for others, which may force us to defer your connections. {quote}
From: help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/mail/postmaster//basics/postmaster-38.html
{quote}To facilitate the smooth flow of messages between legitimate senders and Yahoo! Mail, we offer the following recommendations:
Limit the messages you send per connection
Yahoo! Mail accepts a maximum of 5 messages per SMTP connection. We encourage you to cap the number of messages you send to Yahoo! Mail to fall within this per-connection limit.
When this limit is reached, no further messages will be accepted for delivery as our server automatically terminates the connection (without giving an error code). If you are sending messages to a significant number of Yahoo! Mail users, the suggestions below will help ensure uninterrupted delivery for your messages.
Reestablish connections if you do not get an error code
When our server terminates your connection after 5 messages have been accepted, you may try to reconnect to our MX servers immediately thereafter.
Open concurrent connections
You may open concurrent connections from the same server to facilitate efficient transmission of your messages. However, while we do not publish specific guidelines for the numbers of connections you can concurrently use, we ask that you treat our resources with respect. The more you take, the fewer there are for others, which may force us to deprioritize connections from your server(s).{quote}
In the Server Admin under General one can enable IMAP with a maximum number of connections. However, for normal SMTP there is no connections cap. Unless I am wrong here.
Domain throttling by domain is another way, but the real solution is just dedicated IPs for each website or each website to have a separate MTA. In the past this has meant a dedicated server or a physical gateway.
Technically there should be a Virtual solution. If I can virtually host many sites and many incoming emails on dedicated IP space respective to each domain. There should be virtual MTAs on dedicated or the same respective IP space as the incoming; hence, why I gave the example of how SSL works in Apache with web servers.
Totally get what you are saying on how currently mail works just out the default gateway since there is only one "default" MTA for the "xserve".
Everything is good coming in, but did something somewhere miss the mark on the outgoing? Should be one for one.
Yahoo is the big player putting the foot down or the glass half full people would say setting the mark on how outgoing mail should work when they are accepting emails.
I am not trying to innovate, but rather just follow the rules.
Sure mail out one MTA works no matter how many website you put on the box and it is "good enough for government work" or "looks good from my house".
There are many people struggling with corporate communications (even the concept of corporate communications and marketing) and I think Apple could step up to the plate and help follow the standard of best practices.
I have done research for 10 years and over the past two tested what I know to be true. Then spoke with many businesses that did not understand but had the same issue. . .
Yahoo customers not getting their email communications and email simply not being as good as the old fashion phone call.
So back to your question (fabulous question since every tech asks me the same thing):
{quote}So my question to you is this: why can't you run all your domains on a single server/IP address?{quote}
Because it is no longer 1996 and I want Apple stock to triple!
. . . and that it no longer works for sites conducting a profitable business. We are really underachieving what America could do!
Yahoo! is clearly saying to each business to do business communications or even marketing on separate IPs. Gmail, Hotmail, and the list goes on and on. They all follow the same thing. Yahoo! just happens to be more aggressive and has more good consumers (buyers) using their free email service. Gmail started aliases and could gain market share of buyers.
I need to get Xserve to have one dedicated IP in and out for each independent website whether it is an Apache transaction on port 80 (443 SSL) or an email going out the postfix MTA on port 25 SMTP or any other standard alternative port (587 or 465 SSL) for that matter.
So far everything works as expected, but the SMTP MTA out. One big default gateway per hardware.
We missed the 1% mark. That club that gets it! I would like to see every business owner that buys an Xserve to be in that one percent club out of the box!
Why Rob? Well because it works! Dedicated IPs work. Think about this, if you gave the postman your address and did not include your suite number more than likely your lucky if you get your mail. WORKS the same way for email.
If your business grows you can get a few more until something once again gets abused and they start tracking MAC addresses. By then will have virtual MAC addresses like most routers can already do.
To prevent SPAM you just set the MTA defaults to one IP per website. Let's keep it simple. This way you keep a clean reputation and one reputation per website or business. Most businesses just need one IP and cannot afford a whole server for each website/business. THINK GREEN!!! The email filtering systems (RBLs and filtering rules) already out there will weed abusers out. Let's not hurt the small to medium businesses in the process.
Your not going to get RDNS and dedicated IP space anyhow unless your a real business.

How To Install Multiple OBIEE Instances On One Linux Machine

Hi,
OS: Red Hat ES 5.2
OBIEE : 10.1.3.4
We one development server(Linux) where one OBIEE 10.1.3.4 was installed with os user as 'ora1a' (Deployed on Oracle Application Server 10.1.3.4)
and now I have installed OBIEE 10.1.3.4 on same Linux Server with different user(ora2b) and different mount point (Deployed on Another Oracle Application Server 10.1.3.4 )
But My OBIEE was not working and I came to know that only one can be working by default.
After following few notes i have update NQSConfig.inc and odbc.ini with different ports ie from 9704 to 9725 and bounced BI server and presentation server
But still its not working can any one tell me what are all needs to update to make it work
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Bhanu Chander
Reference's i used: HOW TO: Install Multiple OBIEE Instances On One UNIX Machine (Doc ID 605582.1)

Hi
I was not much clear about what you are telling
See my first OBIEE instance URL is http://hostname18.oracle.com:7777/analytics (As i deployed OBIEE on Application server 10g(OAS1))
and second one is http://hostname18.oracle.com:7778/analytics (As i deployed OBIEE on another Application server 10g(OAS2))
Also My port for first OBIEE instance is 9704 and second one is 9725(Which i changed to this)
Now tell me what are all i should update
Thanks,
Bhanu Chander

How Can I Use Multiple Weblogic Instances in a Single OS

Hello Everyone,
Actually I have to install Some different applications. Few of them need weblogic 10.3.6 and others need 10.3.4. The OS am using is Oracle Enterprise Linux 5.
Now I am able to install 2 separate(One of 10.3.4 and 10.3.6) instances with two different users,In two different directories.
I have installed the weblogic 10.3.6 version with a user webadmin and installed node manager with port 5556. This is working fine.
The main problem here is :
In the second instance (10.3.4 ) installed with a a different user and gave the port number to NodeManager as 1600 and its not getting started. Its throwing error and also after some errors in the terminal am able to see that its reverting to port number 5556 only.
What might be the issue?
I have to install 2 different versions of weblogic in a single Server. But am failing with NodeManager. What Can I do to have multiple weblogic instances with multiple versions in a single server ?
Can anyone suggest a resolution for this please ?
Thanks in advance.

Pl do not spam these forums with multiple posts - How Can I Use Multiple Weblogic Instances in a Single OS

Multiple Tomcat instances on the same server

Can we have multiple tomcat instances load balanced on the same physical box without VM. Has there been any such implementations. How can CMS be distributed across. What can the know architecture for the same.
Regards
Vijsy

This can be done, but it really depends on the load balancer you use.
There is no recommendation from BusinessObjects and you might want to consult the load balancer vendor for instructions and support.
Regards
Caroline

Multiple Portal instances on the same machine

Hi Forum,
we have a requirement where in we are asked to implement multiple instances of Portal on the same machine. can you please give me some detials on Feasibility , issues and limitations of having multiple Portal instances on the same machine , different instances pointing to different tiers(Dev, Test, Production) etc
pointers will be highly appreciated..
regards,
uday

Hi Uday,
Please look at this.
Multiple Portal Instances - Virtual Hosting
Regards,
Siva
P.S: Award points if you find this useful.

One Oracle Application Server and multiple OC4J Instances

While we are getting new server (for development) we have to set-up a Development and Production enviroment for our project (dont have previous OAS installation) but on the same machine.
So, is a good option to have One OAS INstallation (Ora Home) and then create multiple OC4J instances, one for each environment (Development, QA and Production)?, is it possible? How to manage deployments between OC4J instances, simulating different contexts if they are in the same server and under the same HTTP Server? Will be there conflicts?

Hi,
you can do this and OracleAs will manage the different instances. The deployment can be done with Enterprise Manager in which case you select the OC4J instance first before deploying. If deploying from JDeveloper, you can specify the OC4J instance when creating the named connection
Frank

Need to get data from multiple database instances in a single query

Hi,
I need a small favour from you guys. The prob is as follows:
I need to get name, row_id from table A from schema 1 and gbu_name, name from table B from schema 2 where a.name = b.name. I wrote the query in the following manner:
SELECT a.name, a.row_id, b.gbu_name
FROM Schema1.A as a, Schema2.B as b
Where a.name = b.name
But this query is not working and the error is like " The table does not exists".
Please update me how to avoid the error and get the right sort of result.
Thanks & Regards,
Debabrata

Ah, youre actually asking different things.
In your topic title, you say youre running separate instances
In your body text, you say you are under different user/schema
So tell me, do you have more than one database or not? How many entries in your TNS file?
I would say, for "multiple database instances"
SELECT
a.id, b.id
FROM
tableA a
INNER JOIN
tableB@OTHER_DATABASE_LINK_NAME b <--NOTE!
USING(id)And of course you will have to look up CREATE PUBLIC DATABASE LINK sql..
Message was edited by:
charred

Multiple AIA instances on same Linux box

H,
Can multiple SOA instances be deployed on same linux box then with AIA on top of it.
Can some one pls answer this?
Regards,
Rakesh

Yes you can but:
Each SOA installation must be in his own ORACLE_HOME directory.
Each AIA installation must be in his own ORACLE_HOME directory.
You must point to different databases. You can not have mulitple SOA schema's in one sinlge database.
Marc
http://orasoa.blogspot.com

Multiple AIA instances on same server?

Hi,
Does anyone know how to install multiple AIA instances on the same SOA server? The installer hints that this might be possible, although I have not seen how this is done because the installer expects an empty oracle home path. The only information I have found so far is for an earlier 2.x release of AIA and that suggested:
"Each SOA installation must be in his own ORACLE_HOME directory.
Each AIA installation must be in his own ORACLE_HOME directory.
You must point to different databases. You can not have mulitple SOA schema's in one sinlge database."
Is this true?
Thanks,
Kev.

957354 wrote:
Hi Laxman,
If its a testing purpose its ok to have a one oracle_home and single listener for multiple DB. One problem when applying oracle patches for one of the instances running in a multiple DB running then you need to bring all the DB running in that host since the oracle_home is sharing between all db instances.
Thanks
Sunil Rajesh K.C.Starting with 11g, patchset updates are full installs and done into a new home. This makes it possible to migrate one instance at a time. However, your point would be a consideration for one-off patches like CPUs.
However, please note ... OP --- PLEASE NOTE even with multiple oracle homes, you still only need a single listener.

Multiple HTML instances

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for