Multiple planning periods on a day

Hi All,
I am using periodic lot sizing where in I am getting deliveries from vendor for number of times on a day to cover multiple requirements on a day. I have defined planning calendar where in at this moment I am able to maintain maximum three periods on a day. But vendor delivers almost 10 times a day. So I want to define upto 10 periods on single day. Do we have any BAdi or user exit to make it possible?
Please let me know If you need more information about requirement.
Thanks,
Shirish

Hi,
Can you check whether Time Phased Planning in R3 suits your needs.Here you define Planning cycle along with delivery cycle.
Thanks,
nandha

Similar Messages

Hyperion Planning : Period Dimension in Days

I need to realize a period dimension in days! Moreover i need to have an organization in week whic include the existence of week day (Sunday, Monday..) to make a comparison beetween all Sunday in differnet Year.
Is it possible to have a native calendar function in Hyperion Planning, or Does exist another way to solve this problem?
Thanks

Best practice would be to use Period dimension down to weeks then create a 'Days' dimension which holds the weekdays, this will help your blocksize too and will allow the reporting requirements you have mentioned.

SOP planning periods

We are planning products in SOP where the planning period is a generated period (weeks and months). Planning will be done first in period weeks and then in months i.e., the requirements will be entered for first 4 periods as weeks and then for next 2 periods as months.
Example
Planning
Period           Requirements
Week 1     100
Week 2     250
Week 3     300
Week 4     400
Month 1     1500
Month 2     2000
Now we redesigned our planning period pattern as days, weeks and months.
i.e., Week 1 and Week 2 as days then weeks and months as above.
Example
Day 1
Day 2
Day 15
Week 1
Week 2
Month 1
Month 2
In Set parameters for info structures and key figures if we define the planning periodicity as T (Day), W (Week), M (Month) and generate the period, the system is giving an information message
No technical period generated for period unit 'day'
Message no. MA866
And the period is automatically changed to day.
Period unit 'day' is used as planning period unit
Message no. MA859
There is NO PERIOD GENERATION in the info structure?
Is it possible to generate the period pattern as Days, weeks and months ? How ?
Thanks
Soundar

Dear rajesha
The fiscal year variant will be generated when you save the set parameters for info structure.
In this case the the planning period is chaged to days and no fiscal year variat is generated.
Thanks
Soundar

Multiple planned orders for a requirement

Hi,
We have PPDS MRP with NEW shelflife w/ lot size profle run for product and produces multiple planned orders for the the requirements.
I have a requirement of 4,750 and 14,976 in the system and available stock 86,966.
The system creates two planned orders with 34,632 and 26,771 PCs.
Why is the system creating two order instead of one??
The min. lot size is 1876 and rounding is 936.
can somebody tell me what factors the system is considering??
Thanks.

Hi Visu,
Which lot size procedure you are using , please check in lot size tab in Product master, it should be lot for lot.
if it is lot for lot , please change it to by period and weekly , is it change the planned order quantity ?
Manish

Restricting of Fiscal year period for Four days

HI Experts can you pls suggetst
we are providing a layout for an enduser for a particular period through web interface, so that he
can enter the plan data for that period, the issue is like we have a period of 15 days the end user
has to input the plan data for that period, the planning layout should enable for 5 days only, latter
if he want to input the plan data it should not edit or cannot input, how can i go head with this.

Hi.
I suggest you to think about the next approach:
1. Create variable A (based on IO period) for determining a period (lets say it's input variable with range - this range will be 15 days)
2. Create layout in BPS0 when data columns are dynamic for period that has this variable A (in manual input click on "additional settings->in "data columns"->"dynamic for" select period)
3. Create another variable B (I guess it should be user exit variable that gets values from variable A and decides which values will be locked)
4. Create data slice and restrict it with variable B.
This way you will see in layout 15 days in period, but only some of days, depends on variable B, will be opened for input.
Regards.

Planning Period , Planning Horizon terminology in MRP

Dear Sir,
While going thru the MRP related literature on SAP Help , I have not been able to understand the meaning , purpose and usage for the following terminology :
Planning Period
Planning Horizon
I request SAP experts to kindly help me to understand these terminologies and if possible pl give the example under the scenario of Make-To-Stock and Make-To-Order both please .
With Thanks and Rgds
Sonia

Hi,
Planning period facilitates you to put your demands as per your process e.g. day, week or month level.
e.g.
In demand mgmt you can put demands as given below by selecting planning period as per your requirements.
option 1. day level-----
day -               05.12.2009      06.12.2009       07.12.2009   08.12.2009
quantity           1000                1300                  0                   800
option 2. month level------
month                         12.09         01.10
quantity                      10000        12000
Likewise for other planning periods.
Regards,
Yogesh

Combining multiple planned orders into single purchase requisition

Hi Gurus,
could anyone please tell me how to convert multiple planned orders generated during MRP run into a single purchase requisition? Also, is there any other way of getting single purchase requisition fcreated after MRP run for a procured item which is part of multiple BOMs?
Thanks and regards,
Abhik

Hi,
Conversion of Multiple planned order to single Purchase requisition is not possible.
But you can have a single Pur.Req for Multiple requirements.
You can do this by:
1. Individual/collective indicator "2" collective requirements for the Header Material so that you will get your dependent requirements clubbed together.
2. Period Lot sizing : Daily/weekly/monthly Lot size so that system will club the entire period requirements and propose a single lot.
3. for low value materials you can have Reorder Point planning also.
Hope this helps..
Regards,
Siva

T-code to close multiple posting periods in mm

Is there is any t-code to close multiple posting periods in mm?
Regards,
Surendra babu.

Dear Surendra,
Open & Close Posting Periods
FI posting periods:
IMG->Financial Accounting->Financial Accouting Global Settings->Document->Posting Periods->Open and close posting periods.
OB52
MM posting periods:
Logistics->Materials management->Material master->Other->Close period
MMPV (to open current period)
Logistics->Materials management->Material master->Other->Post to prev.period
MMRV (shows what is open)
Also check OB52 for type M
Reward Me If Helpful

"Error determining planning periods for calendar " when running a program

Hi,
When i am running a program with date range say "01/05/2011" to "30/06/2011",the program is executing successfully without any error. When i am executing the same program with date range as a) "01/05/2009" to "30/06/2011" and b)"01/05/2008" to "30/06/2011" the program is failing with error as "Error determining planning periods for calendar". Can anyone suggest me what i should do to avoid the failure of the program with above date ranges also.
Thanks in advance,

Dear,
Error message 61123:"Error determining planning periods for calendar &".The PPC planning calendar specified in the material master MRP 2 view for the material is incorrectly.
The planning calendar periods are insufficiently maintained for the planning calendar used.
Check the period of planning calendar in MD26 and generate the correct period.You can avoid the problem in several ways:
Maintain the planning calendar far enough in the future (at least until beyond the end of the planning horizon).
Also check any demand is lies beyond the validity period of planning calendar.
Reduction of the planning horizon of MRP also can control such issue, as MRP planning horizon lies in an area in which the planning calendar is no longer maintained
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Value of planned delivery time in days not updating

Hello Experts,
i have created a material using BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA.
IN Mrp2 VIEW
PLANNED DELIVERY TIME IN DAys is not updating
i have passed
la_plantdata-plnd_delry = P_PLND_DELRY.
la_plantdatax-plnd_delry = 'x'.
i have commited the work too but the field is not updated
Please help.
Thanks & Regards,
Naresh

Hi,
This question is not related to APO, i would suggest you to post the thread in ABAP forum.
However can you check
can you check whether la_plantdatax-plnd_delry field is 3 charcter or one character field.
Generally it will be like below.
la_plantdata-plnd_delry = 100
la_plantdatax-plnd_delry = 'X
Regards,
Srini

Line Item Grace Periods Vs Min Days in Arrears(Acct)

Hi All,
While configuring Dunning @ FBMP, there are two fields which serve almost the same purpose. They are,
Min. Days in arrears (acct)......If we give say here 3 days, then 3 days will be added to the due date for determining whether dunning can be generated for an open invoice.
Line Item grace periods...........If we give say here 3 days, then 3 days will be added to the due date for determining whether dunning can be generated for an open invoice.
It is observed that if you put equivalent or less than the number of days in Min Days in Arrears field as compared to the number of days entered against Line Item field, then no dunning will be generated.
On the other hand if you put more no of days aginst Min days in arreas field as compared to the no of days put against Line item grace periods field, then the dunning will be generated on the invoice date plus no of days mentioned in Min days in arrears field.
Could any body throw some light on why this happens. More specifically:
1. What is the basic difference between these two fields and their significance for Dunning. I am pretty clear about the meaning of Min days in arreas filed, but not about the other field's significance.
2. Why the system behaves in the fashion that I have described above for different combinations of figures entered in these two fields.
The brief scenario is as below for easy reference:
Details    Min Days in Arr   Line item gr Pd   Dunning Possible
Days            3                       3                    Not Possible
Days            3                       2                    Possible
Days            2                       3                    Not Possible
Please throw some light on this.
Regards
Sudhakar
But it is observed that,

Hello,
Do not leave grace period blank or less than days in
arrears if you do not want to include items in dunning level "0" in your
dunning notice.
As per the documentation, the number of grace days (line item) and
days in arrears (first dunning level) you enter will normally be
identical. So if your days in arrears for level 1 is 14, you should also
indicate grace days of 14. Otherwise, if you leave the grace days
blank or less than 14, the system will include also items in arrears
earlier than 14 days (level 1).
As per online documentation:
Grace period shorter than days in arrears
In this case there may be items which are overdue but which do not
reach a certain dunning level due to the days in arrears. Although
these items are printed out, they receive the dunning level zero.
These items alone cannot trigger a dunning notice.
Regards,
Renan

Multiple planned orders in MRP run

Hi All
I have a requirement where I need to create multiple planned order for the same material during MRP run. I understand that once I run MRP a planned order creates. If I run again for the same material, the quantity will be changed for the same planned order. Do we have any configuration so that system creates multiple planned orders for same material for each MRP run.

Hi Adithya
Planned orders may be changed by MRP until they are firmed. Therefore, what you need to do is to firm the planned orders after the MRP execution.
You can use for example, transaction MD19 to mass firm planned orders after each MRP run.
Otherwise, you can user BAdI MD_PLDORD_CHANGE to automatically firm the planned orders created by MRP.
BR
Caetano

Is there any provesion to convert multiple planned order to one PR

hi,,
i want to know is there any provesion to convert multiple planned orders to one PR .let it may create as different line item in PR. if is there please let me know
thanks in advance
regards
madan

Hi madan,
i dont think there is any way of clubbing multiple planned orders into single PR. Like Taj suggested, you could decrease the number of planned order created thro MRP run by working on different strategies on your lot sizing key / procedure.
Also, i am assuming here that you want to club the planned orders of a single material into a single PR and also it is no way related to different account assignments.
The other way possibly u could do it is, do a Z programme and modify your MD15 transaction. This idea is bit vague, possibly the forum could build on it.
reg
kiki

Planned delivery time in days is not updating

Hi Experts,
planned delivey time in days is not getting updated with BAPI_MATERIAL_SAVEDATA.
The same type gr_pr_time is getting updated i have commmited it even though it is not reflecting the value.
i have passed
la_plantdatax-plnd_delry =100.
Please Help.
Regards,
Naresh
Edited by: naresh.k.dasari on Feb 18, 2011 6:31 AM

Hi,
This question is not related to APO, i would suggest you to post the thread in ABAP forum.
However can you check
can you check whether la_plantdatax-plnd_delry field is 3 charcter or one character field.
Generally it will be like below.
la_plantdata-plnd_delry = 100
la_plantdatax-plnd_delry = 'X
Regards,
Srini

Multiple plans for my SQL- Which one is following?-11gr2

11gr2, windows-64-bit
I have one sql_id part of 3rd part application, need to tune it. When I tried to get its execution plan im seeing multiple plan_plan values. That means, multiple plans for
same sql_id
How could we know that which plan my sql_id is following.?
SQL> set lines 300
SQL> set pages 50
SQL> select * from TABLE(dbms_xplan.display_awr('5z1r29wc6514q'));
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
SQL_ID 5z1r29wc6514q
SELECT INVOICE_ID,min(CHARGE_DATE),MAX(CHARGE_DATE),
sum(TOTAL_EXCL_VAT),sum(case when instr(LEVEL2,:"SYS_B_0")>:"SYS_B_1"
then SUM_QUANTITY else :"SYS_B_2" end) as KB from
RATOR_CDR.INVOICE_DETAIL_LINE I INNER JOIN SUBSCRIPTION S ON S.ID =
I.SUBSCRIPTION_ID inner join SERVICE S1 on S1.SUBSCRIPTION_ID=S.ID
WHERE INVOICE_ID in (SELECT id from RATOR.INVOICE WHERE
invoice_number is null) and S1.PHONE_NUMBER=:1   and LEVEL1=:2 group
by INVOICE_ID
Plan hash value: 216300602
| Id | Operation                            | Name                  | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                     |                       |       |       | 1350 (100)|       |          |       |
|   1 | HASH GROUP BY                       |                       |   333 | 40293 | 1350   (1)| 00:00:17 |       |       |
|   2 |   HASH JOIN                          |                       |   333 | 40293 | 1348   (1)| 00:00:17 |       |       |
|   3 |    NESTED LOOPS                      |                       |       |       |            |       |          |       |
|   4 |     NESTED LOOPS                     |                       | 1638 |   161K|   866   (0)| 00:00:11 |       |       |
|   5 |      NESTED LOOPS                    |                       |     1 |    34 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   6 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID    | SERVICE               |     1 |    23 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   7 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN              | SERVICE__PHONE_NUMBER |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   8 |       INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | SUBSCRIPTION__ID_PK   |     1 |    11 |     0   (0)|       |          |       |
|   9 |      PARTITION RANGE ALL             |                       | 1684 |       |    46   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |    17 |
| 10 |       INDEX RANGE SCAN               | IDL_SUB_ID            | 1684 |       |    46   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |    17 |
| 11 |     TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| INVOICE_DETAIL_LINE   | 1581 |   103K|   864   (0)| 00:00:11 |     1 |     1 |
| 12 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL                 | INVOICE               | 6048 |   118K|   481   (1)| 00:00:06 |       |       |
SQL_ID 5z1r29wc6514q
SELECT INVOICE_ID,min(CHARGE_DATE),MAX(CHARGE_DATE),
sum(TOTAL_EXCL_VAT),sum(case when instr(LEVEL2,:"SYS_B_0")>:"SYS_B_1"
then SUM_QUANTITY else :"SYS_B_2" end) as KB from
RATOR_CDR.INVOICE_DETAIL_LINE I INNER JOIN SUBSCRIPTION S ON S.ID =
I.SUBSCRIPTION_ID inner join SERVICE S1 on S1.SUBSCRIPTION_ID=S.ID
WHERE INVOICE_ID in (SELECT id from RATOR.INVOICE WHERE
invoice_number is null) and S1.PHONE_NUMBER=:1   and LEVEL1=:2 group
by INVOICE_ID
Plan hash value: 1282779260
| Id | Operation                            | Name                  | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                     |                       |       |       | 1392 (100)|       |          |       |
|   1 | HASH GROUP BY                       |                       |   325 | 39000 | 1392   (1)| 00:00:17 |       |       |
|   2 |   HASH JOIN                          |                       |   325 | 39000 | 1391   (1)| 00:00:17 |       |       |
|   3 |    TABLE ACCESS FULL                 | INVOICE               | 5972 |   116K|   550   (1)| 00:00:07 |       |       |
|   4 |    NESTED LOOPS                      |                       |       |       |            |       |          |       |
|   5 |     NESTED LOOPS                     |                       | 1794 |   175K|   840   (0)| 00:00:11 |       |       |
|   6 |      NESTED LOOPS                    |                       |     1 |    34 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   7 |       TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID    | SERVICE               |     1 |    23 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   8 |        INDEX RANGE SCAN              | SERVICE__PHONE_NUMBER |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   9 |       INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | SUBSCRIPTION__ID_PK   |     1 |    11 |     0   (0)|       |          |       |
| 10 |      PARTITION RANGE ALL             |                       | 1836 |       |    48   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |    18 |
| 11 |       INDEX RANGE SCAN               | IDL_SUB_ID            | 1836 |       |    48   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |    18 |
| 12 |     TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| INVOICE_DETAIL_LINE   | 1722 |   110K|   838   (0)| 00:00:11 |     1 |     1 |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------also, Any suggestions to tune this query
Thanks

Harry wrote:
11gr2, windows-64-bit
I have one sql_id part of 3rd part application, need to tune it. how do plan on modifying 3 ^rd^ party application?

Multiple planning periods on a day

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for