Multiple recipient SMS failure

When I send out an multiple recipient SMS from my IPhone 4s to my daughter's Verizon Env 3 and my son's verizon IPhone 4s, only my son receives the message. When I send a single recipient SMS to my daughter she can receive it then only. What's going on here?

bolterdude,
Good afternoon!
I want to help get this working properly for you. Is this a standard SMS/Text message you are sending? Or is this an MMS/Picture message you are sending? If a picture message, the file size may be too big to receive as @Ann154 suggested. When it sends from your 4S to your son’s 4S, is it being sent as an iMessage? Is the EnV 3 newly activated to your daughter’s line? Please go into Settings & Tools>Phone Settings> Security> ENTER LOCK CODE> Restrictions> ENTER LOCK CODE, then confirm the ‘Messages’ settings are all set to ‘Allow All’ to ensure the device will accept all text messages. Please reply back so I and the community can assist further.
Thank you!
AdamE_VZW
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

Similar Messages

Multiple recipient email addresses is not working for xsl & PDF Attachment

multiple recipient email addresses is not working properly when
to list has some external email address and sending xls and PDF file as an attachment.
Test Scenario:
(A) Create mail target activity
1)To email : use the multiple email id with some external domain (ex.
[email protected] ,[email protected], [email protected])
2)File attachment with .xls file and this file is sending to mail target as an inputstream(at runtime)
3)Use all other valid parameter in activity.
(B) Create a process flow File source to mail target
Execute the process flow.
Actual Result: Mail is received by every email account. Only external email account get correct file but other email account(as ([email protected])) attachment files
displaying message
�abc.xls� can not be accessed. The file may be read-only, Or you may be
trying to access a read only location. Or, the server the document is stored on
may not be responding.�
When i trying to open xls and PDF file
Expected Result:
All type of file attachments should be supported with all valid email address
(servers).
Pls help me about this senario:
What is problem in this case:
I am sending code
Session session =getSession(host,port,secure);
session.setDebug(this._debug);
               Transport trans = connect(host,port,session,userID,password);
               Message message = new MimeMessage(session);
               InternetAddress[] iAddr = null;
               message.setFrom(new InternetAddress(fromName));
               iAddr = InternetAddress.parse(toUserName, true);
               message.setRecipients(Message.RecipientType.TO, iAddr);
               message.setSubject(subject);
               //BodyPart messageBodyPart = new MimeBodyPart();
               Multipart multipart = new MimeMultipart();
               MimeBodyPart messageBodyPart=null;
if(dataLocation!=null && dataLocation.equalsIgnoreCase("ATTACHMENT")){
                    String tmpName=fileName;
                    if( inputstream != null)
                              tmpName = makeAttachment(fileName,inputstream);
                    messageBodyPart = new MimeBodyPart();
                    DataSource source = new FileDataSource(tmpName);
                    messageBodyPart.setDataHandler(new DataHandler(source));
                    fileName = fileName.replace('\\', '/');
                    fileName = fileName.substring(fileName.lastIndexOf('/') + 1,
                              fileName.length());
                    messageBodyPart.setFileName(fileName);
                    multipart.addBodyPart(messageBodyPart);

First, when sending your message, the filename should be a simple
filename, not containing any directory names.
It sounds like your mail server might be doing some special
processing of attachments, perhaps to prevent viruses.

Establishing multiple recipient group in Mail?

I need to establish a contact list for a large group of people to whom I will be sending out weekly emails. Is there a way to simply paste in all of the email addresses at once into the BCC field and then somehow set all of those recipients as a single 'group' that I can reuse again without having to repaste in all the addresses each time?
Alternatively, it appears that Apple Mail expects you to use your Address Book to establish email groups. Honestly, I would rather not have all of these people in my Address Book, since I don't even know most of them. But, in the event that using the Address Book is the only way to set up a multiple recipient group, is there a way to, again, paste in all of the addresses at once rather than having to edit each recipient separately? I only have the email addresses (no names or other info) in an Excel spreadsheet. I've tried importing via csv and that failed miserably.
Any suggests are welcome

Greetings,
Is there a way to simply paste in all of the email addresses at once into the BCC field and then somehow set all of those recipients as a single 'group'
Sorry, you can't do that.
Alternatively, it appears that Apple Mail expects you to use your Address Book to establish email groups.
True, since that's what Address Book is for; keeping your contacts readily available and organized.
But, in the event that using the Address Book is the only way to set up a multiple recipient group, is there a way to, again, paste in all of the addresses at once rather than having to edit each recipient separately?
Sorry, no. You need to create a contact for each of your intended members of the group, even if all you have is their email addrress. Then you can create a new group with whatever name you like and move those contacts to that group, which you can then select to send your email to when you're in Mail.

Form results return to multiple recipient

Is there a way of allowing forms to return the collected information to multiple recipient?
I would love if anyone could point me in the right direction.
Thanks a mil

You could build a process using Workbench that uses Forms and then send the information to multiple participants.
Jasmin

Send PO via email to multiple recipient

Hi,
We are using the standard output type NEU, medium 5 (external send). But the standard PO process will send email to only 1 recipient. The email will be taken from the vendor master where email is flagged as Standard.
Is there any other way (or any user exit) to send PO to a multiple recipient (TO and COPY-TO)? We are planning to maintain other email address from the contact persons address in vendor master.
Appreciate your input.
Thanks

hi the following are the two scenarios defined plz look in
Hi ,
call the following function module in a loop and pass the values in the reciever list table with the no. of email ids and check the output .hope it works
Creating the entry for the compressed document
CLEAR gs_objpack-transf_bin.
gs_objpack-head_start = 1.
gs_objpack-head_num = 0.
gs_objpack-body_start = 1.
gs_objpack-body_num = gv_tab_lines.
gs_objpack-doc_type = 'RAW'.
APPEND gs_objpack TO gt_objpack.
Entering names in the distribution list
IF p_plist IS NOT INITIAL.
gs_reclist-receiver = p_plist.
gs_reclist-rec_type = gc_c.
APPEND gs_reclist TO gt_reclist.
CLEAR gs_reclist.
ENDIF.
Populating the reciever list
gs_reclist-receiver = p_plist.
gs_reclist-rec_type = gc_u.
APPEND gs_reclist TO gt_reclist.
Sending the document
CALL FUNCTION 'SO_NEW_DOCUMENT_ATT_SEND_API1'
EXPORTING
document_data = gs_doc_chng
put_in_outbox = gc_x
commit_work = gc_x
TABLES
packing_list = gt_objpack
object_header = gt_objhead
contents_bin = gt_objbin
contents_txt = gt_objtxt
receivers = gt_reclist
EXCEPTIONS
too_many_receivers = 1
document_not_sent = 2
operation_no_authorization = 4
OTHERS = 99.
CASE sy-subrc.
WHEN 0.
WRITE: 'eMail sent successfully'(005).
WHEN OTHERS.
WRITE: / 'eMail could not be sent'(008).
ENDCASE.
in order to change that u have to alter ur print program and use condition value of nacha ...on the other side u have to configure the nace output type and make the scot settings.
for this use the following code.
*& Form nacha_5
Send the Form as an Email
-->P_FOUND Flag 'X' if sub routine is found
FORM nacha_5 USING write_out TYPE xfeld
CHANGING p_found TYPE xfeld.
DATA : lv_mail_id TYPE so_name,
lv_mail_tp TYPE so_escape VALUE 'U',
l_subrc TYPE sy-subrc.
p_found = 'X'.
Get the Mail ID from the Control Table
lv_mail_id = t_ctrl_app-recipient.
Create The Recipient Object
CALL FUNCTION 'CREATE_RECIPIENT_OBJ_PPF'
EXPORTING
ip_mailaddr = lv_mail_id
ip_type_id = lv_mail_tp
IMPORTING
ep_recipient_id = w_recipient
EXCEPTIONS
invalid_recipient = 1
OTHERS = 2.
IF sy-subrc NE 0.
IF write_out = 'X'.
FORMAT COLOR 6.
WRITE AT /5 text-001.
ENDIF.
RAISE other.
ENDIF.
Create The Sender Object
CALL FUNCTION 'CREATE_SENDER_OBJECT_PPF'
EXPORTING
ip_sender = sy-uname
IMPORTING
ep_sender_id = w_sender
EXCEPTIONS
invalid_sender = 1
OTHERS = 2.
IF sy-subrc NE 0.
IF write_out = 'X'.
FORMAT COLOR 6.
WRITE AT /5 text-002.
ENDIF.
RAISE other.
ENDIF.
Populate the Control Data & Title
w_sf_control-device = 'MAIL'.
w_sf_control-no_dialog = 'X'.
w_sf_control-langu = t_ctrl_app-spras.
Nacha = 2
Populate the Fax Number and the country.
Data : lv_fax_tp TYPE so_escape VALUE 'F',
lv_fax = t_ctrl_app-recipient.
lv_land1 = t_ctrl_app-country.
Create the Recipient Object
CALL FUNCTION 'CREATE_RECIPIENT_OBJ_PPF'
EXPORTING
ip_country = lv_land1
ip_faxno = lv_fax
ip_type_id = lv_fax_tp
IMPORTING
ep_recipient_id = w_recipient
EXCEPTIONS
invalid_recipient = 1
OTHERS = 2.
IF sy-subrc NE 0.
IF write_out = 'X'.
FORMAT COLOR 6.
WRITE AT /5 text-004.
ENDIF.
RAISE other.
ENDIF.
Create The Sender Object
CALL FUNCTION 'CREATE_SENDER_OBJECT_PPF'
EXPORTING
ip_sender = sy-uname
IMPORTING
ep_sender_id = w_sender
EXCEPTIONS
invalid_sender = 1
OTHERS = 2.
IF sy-subrc NE 0.
IF write_out = 'X'.
FORMAT COLOR 6.
WRITE AT /5 text-003.
ENDIF.
RAISE other.
ENDIF.
Populate the Control Data
w_sf_control-device = 'TELEFAX'.
w_sf_control-no_dialog = 'X'.
w_sf_control-langu = t_ctrl_app-spras.
Populate the Output Options.
w_output_options-tdteleland = lv_land1.
w_output_options-tdtelenum = lv_fax.
w_output_options-faxformat = 'PS'.

Multiple recipioent SMS - E90

My apologies if this has has been asked before.
When I bought my E90 in July 2007 it had a feature whereby when drafting an sms one could select "Add Recipient" then the contact list would come up, one then checked all the boxes next to the names one wanted to receive the message, and then in the top right of the screen was a button, I think marked OK which took you back to the message with all the recipients now added to the message.
I upgraded the software about 4 months ago because it seemed to be running slow, and I recalled that a software update fixed the go-slow problem on my E60. Indeed the software did fix the go-slow, however on the sms function, although i can still "Add Recipient" the OK button from the top right is gone. so if recipients are checked there is no way to exit that screen and get back to the message. if I use the back button, all the added recipients are dropped.
I updated today to the latest software version hoping this was a bug and it had been fixed, but no such luck.
Does anyone have any idea how to fix this, or am I condemned to another long wait with a number in my hand at Nokia to hear the latest round of excuses...

I've just tried it on my E90 (FW 210.xxx.xxx) and it works fine. Add Recipient has an OK button, and I can select multiple recipients...

Multiple iMac LogicBoard failures

So 3 years ago I took the plunged and converted the house to Macs. Nice experience generally. Yet in the last 2 months I have had two logicboard failures on two iMacs. The cost to fix these was quoted at over $1,000 each computer. Obviously given the age of the machines, this is not a viable fix.
I am now considering moving back to PC's (my 3 year old Mac laptop is also playing up).
After logicboard failure #1, I reluctantly forked out $2K for a new machine. I racked this up as a "bad" and unusual unit. #2 comes along and fails and it makes me mad. Worse, no sympathy from the guys in the Apple Store. I ask "Surely for a machine of this age, noone would possibly pay for a $1K logicboard? Isn't this priced to basically make you buy a new machine?" All I got back was smiles (they really didn't care it seems).
Question:
- Are Mac's prone to hardware failures?
- If they do get hardware failures are you basically just in trouble given the absurd component prices to fix ($700 for the logicboard part alone)? How can Apple justify $700 for a logicboard part?
- Does Apple offer any discounts to people who have had these multiple bad experiences? (I'm partly kidding here, but also hoping)
My Mac laptop is playing up so I may be two Mac's down. I am considering going back to the darkside now and buying PC's again.
Anyone got any comments?
Thanks

That a UPS unit would have prevented your logic board failures. Properly designed power supplies do not need a UPS unit in this country. In some third world countries where the power is unreliable on a daily basis with large power swings, they are a must have.
In my opinion, the G5 iMac's were a poor design with inadequate heat dissipation, weak power supplies and logic boards. Most of them ran for years, but an inordinate number of them had multiple failures. The new aluminum models are a much better design with most of the high heat components located at the top of the machine.
I had no hardware problems with my eight year old Dell...but I'm still sticking with Apple because of their superior software performance.
Good luck with what ever you decide...virg

Multiple Hard Drive Failures on my Macbook Pro - Entourage reminders?

Over the past 2 months I've had three hard drives fail on three different macbook pro computers.
I've retraced my steps, searched many forums, and spoken with multiple Mac Geniuses but still can't figure out what's happening. The IT guy at work is about to kill me and I really want to figure out what's going wrong so I can fix it (or change my current behaviors).
Computer #1 - Out of the box, 2-3 weeks old. I took the computer home to do some work over the weekend. I didn't turn the it off before transporting it, but I did wait for it to go to sleep completely (I've since read that it takes a few moments while things in RAM switch over to the Hard Drive to save incase of power failure). I worked on it a bit at home, mostly just internet searches and a few word documents. When I returned to work my computer was running slowly and suddenly all of the programs locked. Since I've had this problem before with my personal computer (a G4 Powerbook), I tried the force quit options to no avail so I just held down the power key to power off. When I rebooted I got the dreaded "no" symbol.
Computer 2: IT gave me a used macbook pro that they repurposed for me. I made sure to shut down before transporting this computer. A few days later, before I even got to transfer all of my files, the computer started running slowly, programs locked. I eventually got the computer to shut itself down (as IT didn't want me to do a forced reboot) but upon restarting I got an even more dreaded screen, the folder with a question mark in it.
Computer 3: It was a fairly new computer, though a bit more ram, and probably only a few months old (used by a freelancer). It worked great. I took it home several times, transfered all of my files. Set up everything perfectly. Three weeks in, after working at my desk for about 4 hours, everything began to slow down. I called IT immediately and remotely sent a force shut down message. Nothing happened for about 15 minutes so I left for a meeting. I came back a few hours later and my computer was off. When it restarted, nothing appeared. There wasn't a "no" symbol or folder with a question mark in it, just a blank screen.
I've read and thought about all of the options.
- Large Magnet somewhere - It would have affected my personal computer (if at home) or my colleagues (if at work) or everyone else in nyc (while on the subway)
- Too hot - Possible I suppose, but how does running iTunes, powerpoint, and entourage do this?
- Downloaded something/Virus - We don't have administrative privileges. I can only update some software and send/receive folders. Plus, can any single file cause this much damage?
- Moved before asleep - This might have happened on the first computer, but I doubt it could happen to three. I always shut it down now before transporting, and I was sitting at my desk for hours before I had any trouble last time.
The one common factor that I haven't mentioned.
We use Entourage as a mail client here.
Each time the computer froze, the first things to freeze were the Entourage calendar reminders. Entourage seems to run strangely with the airport, but not with our LAN. When my computer froze last time, I had the aiport on but was working off the LAN. Could Entourage cause this much trouble? Has anyone else had trouble with entourage calendar reminders or failing hard drives?
Oh, and it also always happens on a Monday. I've taken the computers home multiple times though, so I'm not sure if it's something I'm doing during the transport or not, but the computer is always off now when I move it. I also cary my personal computer with me often, same routes and bags, so I'm not sure why it's not affected.
Thanks

columbus new boy wrote:
How crap is that?
It's not crap at all.
It's not that simple. For example, I've 3500 songs on my MacBook but don't want them all on my phone, so I have to manually select each song again???
There has to be a solution.
Why not simply make a playlist with the songs you want on the iPhone?
and maintain a current backup of your computer.

Can you have multiple signon password failure limits on a same E-Bussiness?

Hi gentlemen,
I'm not the DBA of the company that I work for, but what I'm having is a problem that he's not helping me to solve. Another thing, I'm workin in an Oracle 12i E-Bussiness Suite.
The thing is that the users of multiple plants of a same holding are entering entering their information thru the same site of the Oracle E-Business Suite, because of the configuration of this site the profiles of the users have a SIGNON_PASSWORD_FAILURE_LIMIT of 5. This limit is fine with us if we are speaking of management users, but when we speak of users that work on the plant and are reporting to the ERP is another thing, they must be connected constantly to the Database.
The problem is that by the decision of the DBA and the Headquarters plenty of the operators that work on a same shift and equal machines share the same user/password on the system, therefore if any of them failes at least five times the password all of the other operators get locked to. This is becoming annoying for us in the plant because we are loosing time, information and efficiency. The fact is that most of the operators don't have full knowledge of the way a computer works, so we can't force on to them a politic of a maximum number of failures, we are trainning them and trying to change their culture but this is not a that comes around in the short term.
The other problem it's that putting the SIGNON_PASSWORD_FAILURE_LIMIT to 0 or unlimited is a high security risk and it would apply to all the users of the site.
So my question goes to the following: Is there a way in an E-Bussiness Site to have some users having a limit and others that don't? Can I create two sign on profiles, one with a limit of 5 and the other with a limit of 0, and I just assign some of the users to the first and some to the later? How would I do that? or is it true (as the DBA says) that since I'm working on a Site then I just have to work with one limit for all and I can't do any variations because it always will prevail the SIGNON_PASSWORD_FAILURE_LIMIT and I just can declare one for the hole site? Can I declare a SIGNON_PASSWORD_FAILURE_LIMIT of 0 but thru other privilege, responsability or user specification can I limit the number of failures for a group of users? Is the solution the creation of individual or specific users for each operator, so if one of them failes then the others could work without a problem?
I'd really appreciate your help.
Thanks,
César

You can run multiple instances of IDM with out a problem. Just point them at the same repository and resources etc.. You also have the ability to restrict certain types of processing to specific servers if you need to as well.

Multiple security audit failures a second

A client's SBS 2011 machine is experiencing multiple audit failures a second and we believe it is diminishing the performance of the machine. We can't seem to find the source or how to remedy the issue. It its happening way too fast to be a human trying
to login.
Keywords Date and Time Source Event ID Task Category
Audit Success 6/18/2014 1:50:32 PM Microsoft-Windows-Security-Auditing 4905 Audit Policy Change "An attempt was made to unregister a security event source.
Subject
Security ID: SYSTEM
Account Name: SBS$
Account Domain: <ommited from forum post>
Logon ID: 0x3e7
Process:
Process ID: 0x10d4
Process Name: C:\Program Files\Windows Server\Bin\SharedServiceHost.exe
Event Source:
Source Name: ServiceModel 4.0.0.0
Event Source ID: 0x262070f0"
Audit Success 6/18/2014 1:50:32 PM Microsoft-Windows-Security-Auditing 4904 Audit Policy Change "An attempt was made to register a security event source.
Subject :
Security ID: SYSTEM
Account Name: SBS$
Account Domain: < ommited from forum post >
Logon ID: 0x3e7
Process:
Process ID: 0x10d4
Process Name: C:\Program Files\Windows Server\Bin\SharedServiceHost.exe
Event Source:
Source Name: ServiceModel 4.0.0.0
Event Source ID: 0x262070f0"
Audit Failure 6/18/2014 1:50:32 PM Microsoft-Windows-Security-Auditing 4625 Logon "An account failed to log on.
Subject:
Security ID: SYSTEM
Account Name: SBS$
Account Domain: <ommited from forum post>
Logon ID: 0x3e7
Logon Type: 3
Account For Which Logon Failed:
Security ID: NULL SID
Account Name:
Account Domain:
Failure Information:
Failure Reason: Unknown user name or bad password.
Status: 0xc000006d
Sub Status: 0xc0000064
Process Information:
Caller Process ID: 0x24c
Caller Process Name: C:\Windows\System32\lsass.exe
Network Information:
Workstation Name: SBS
Source Network Address: -
Source Port: -
Detailed Authentication Information:
Logon Process: Schannel
Authentication Package: Kerberos
Transited Services: -
Package Name (NTLM only): -
Key Length: 0
Subject
Security ID:
SYSTEM
Account Name:
SBS$
Account Domain:
<ommited from forum post>
Logon ID:
0x3e7
Process:
Process ID:
0x131c
Process Name:
C:\Program Files\Windows Server\Bin\SharedServiceHost.exe
Event Source:
Source Name:
ServiceModel 4.0.0.0
Event Source ID:
0x26206ef4"
Audit Success 6/18/2014 1:50:32 PM
Microsoft-Windows-Security-Auditing
4904 Audit Policy Change
"An attempt was made to register a security event source.
Subject :
Security ID:
SYSTEM
Account Name:
SBS$
Account Domain:
<ommited from forum post>
Logon ID:
0x3e7
Process:
Process ID:
0x131c
Process Name:
C:\Program Files\Windows Server\Bin\SharedServiceHost.exe
Event Source:
Source Name:
ServiceModel 4.0.0.0
Event Source ID:
0x26206ef4"
Audit Failure 6/18/2014 1:50:32 PM
Microsoft-Windows-Security-Auditing
4625 Logon
"An account failed to log on.
Subject:
Security ID:
SYSTEM
Account Name:
SBS$
Account Domain:
<ommited from forum post>
Logon ID:
0x3e7
Logon Type: 3
Account For Which Logon Failed:
Security ID:
NULL SID
Account Name:
Account Domain:
Failure Information:
Failure Reason:
Unknown user name or bad password.
Status:
0xc000006d
Sub Status:
0xc0000064
Process Information:
Caller Process ID:
0x24c
Caller Process Name:
C:\Windows\System32\lsass.exe
Network Information:
Workstation Name:
SBS
Source Network Address:
Source Port:
Detailed Authentication Information:
Logon Process:
Schannel
Authentication Package:
Kerberos
Transited Services:
Package Name (NTLM only):
Key Length:
0
Jerry T

Hi Jerry,
Windows logs logon type 3 in most cases when you access a computer from elsewhere on the network. This is usually
related to share folders, printers, IIS and so on.
Would you please let me confirm whether you had installed some third-party applications?
Meanwhile, please refer to Robert’s suggestion in the following similar thread and check if can help you.
Audit
Failure - Event 4625
If any update, please feel free to let me know.
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Justin Gu

Multiple power adaptor failures

I'm posting on here partly out of frustration, and partly in the hope that someone may be able to help.
I have a late 2011 MacBook Pro 13 inch, that up until July of this year (2013), I was very happy with.
However, in July my power adaptor failed. I had a dimly lit LED and when clicking the battery icon, I was told "Battery is not charging", "Power source: Power Adaptor".
I took my MacBook to the local Premium Reseller (on apples advice) and they replaced the adaptor.
The problem re-occured only a month later. Same problem, same advice, same replacement. This happened THREE times, each time about a month since the previous occasion.
These adaptors were treated well. Rarely used in a different location, and kept free of kinks or stresses.
This month, the problem repeated, AGAIN. I took it to my local service centre and this time they diagnosed a logic board failure, and replaced the part under applecare. They also provided ANOTHER new adaptor.
I picked up my MacBook yesterday. The problem repeated itself today.
I am starting to go slightly mad at this point. The most apple will help over the phone is to tell me to visit the repair centre again and hope for the best, but I'm at my wits end now.
If anyone has any idea what the problem could be, please let me know, because I'm really getting nowhere at the moment with applecare.

That a UPS unit would have prevented your logic board failures. Properly designed power supplies do not need a UPS unit in this country. In some third world countries where the power is unreliable on a daily basis with large power swings, they are a must have.
In my opinion, the G5 iMac's were a poor design with inadequate heat dissipation, weak power supplies and logic boards. Most of them ran for years, but an inordinate number of them had multiple failures. The new aluminum models are a much better design with most of the high heat components located at the top of the machine.
I had no hardware problems with my eight year old Dell...but I'm still sticking with Apple because of their superior software performance.
Good luck with what ever you decide...virg

Multiple iMac display failures

Hi there, my late 2009 27" iMac has had two display failures since I purchased it. The most recent replacement was done by Apple in Nov 2012 while still under Apple Care. It is currently in need of a third display (the replacement one has failed after 23 months), is this normal for this product that will be five years old next month? Or do I have something else that is the issue or perhaps a lemon product?

That a UPS unit would have prevented your logic board failures. Properly designed power supplies do not need a UPS unit in this country. In some third world countries where the power is unreliable on a daily basis with large power swings, they are a must have.
In my opinion, the G5 iMac's were a poor design with inadequate heat dissipation, weak power supplies and logic boards. Most of them ran for years, but an inordinate number of them had multiple failures. The new aluminum models are a much better design with most of the high heat components located at the top of the machine.
I had no hardware problems with my eight year old Dell...but I'm still sticking with Apple because of their superior software performance.
Good luck with what ever you decide...virg

.Mac multiple accounts password failures?

I have been looking for help on a password trouble I experienced starting Wednesday night.
I have a new .Mac account for my university teaching in addition to my personal .Mac account. Following methods in this forum, I have been using iWebSites to manage multiple sites on both .Mac accounts, using the .Mac Preference Panel trick, switching from one account to another when needed.
After I used Backup Wednesday evening of all my iWeb sites to my personal .Mac account, I cannot switch back to my university .Mac account.
It is password failure.
In addition, when I bought the new account last week, I deliberately entered a false day and month of birth. I usually just use Jan. 1 for that kind of thing, but not always. The password help for .Mac accounts requires either access to the email account in question OR a "secret question" and answer, which I know, but only if you authenicate the day and month of birth in the account. I cannot remember the phony day and month I entered last week!
So I am slightly hosed.
I have tried most of the tactics in the earlier thread,
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=949682&tstart=0
but to no avail.
Also, I have a trouble report through the .Mac support site, but have not talked directly to a human being about it.
Advice welcome.

I used an alternate route to
(a) speak to a person at Apple
(b) about .Mac account re-set.
I went through the customer service branch on the 800 MY APPLE line, and then selected help with a previous purchase. This got me to a person. Then I used my invoice info to autheticate my request, and they pushed my help request over to the .Mac Help Guy through their internal network. Bingo.
One of the other Apple phone line people said that the .Mac Help Guy really is one guy running four computers! I do not want to believe that but who knows!

Messaging Multiple Recipients (SMS)

Any idea how to send sms to multiple recipients at once with the Lumia 800?
I remember it was fairly easy with the N78.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

In the To box at the top of the message type the first few letters of their name and you'll see their name appear, touch it to add it, repeat with each person.
If you have a regular set of people you send messages to you could set them up as a group to save time and just message the group.

Recipient Policies failure when adding new users

Hi,
I have some trouble adding new users to my Exchange 2007 setup. I get the message "The Exchange server address list service fail to respond. This could be because of an address list or email address policy configuration error"
Of course I Googled around to find solutions, but after trying everything, it still doesn't work. System Attendant just seems to run nice.
This is the 8231 message I get in the logs:
Permanent failure reported by policy group provider for 'CN=Recipient Policies,CN=First Organization,CN=Microsoft Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,DC=[org],DC=local':'MAD.EXE', error=8000ffff. Taking provider offline.
After Googling the error I came across al kind of solutions, however, most of them relate to Exchange 2003.
Pretty much the issue here; http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/f1c07fe1-451f-4cf4-8b8d-3e0d15376307/the-exchange-server-address-list-service-failed-to-respond-this-could-be-because-of-an-address?forum=exchangesvrgenerallegacy
Is there any way of recreating the Default Policy? It doesn't work through Management Console. Maybe via ADSI?
Could anyone help? Thanks a lot.

Hi Combo,
Just check if msexchangeSystemAttendant service is running fine. If not please start System Attendant Service.
Also try restarting the system attendant service and file distribution service and check if they are already started
Run ExBPA and see if it throws any errors related to Email address policies which might help
Increase Diagnostic Logging for MSExchangeAL for below parameters to expert and see if it generates any relevant logs in event viewer
a)Address List Syncronizataion
b)Ldap Operations
If nothing works its better remove and recreate email address policies
Please mark as helpful if you find my contribution useful or as an answer if it does answer your question.That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you.
Regards,
Sathish

Multiple recipient SMS failure

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for