My Bad Experience with Time Machine

First, I would like to start by saying that I am not an advanced Mac user. I just so happened to stumble upon the solution using google. (The best form of tech support).
The short version of this is if you are restoring from Time Machine DO NOT Drag-and-Drop, use the Time Machine interface and if you are having Access Control List problems see the command at the bottom to clear them out, and so that the Mac will rebuild the ACL from each file.
Okay, I was running Leopard, and it started to act funny, random freezes, kernel panics, programs locking up. I (coming from the windows world) thought that a program had modified a critical system file (as I was running a few programs in beta state). So the then pulled out the Leopard install disc, and because I had all of my files backed up using Time Machine I didn’t worry about things too much. I did an erase and install and it said that “the package ‘essentials’ could not be verified”. I restarted and tried to install again, thinking that it was just a fluke. I then continued to try again, I tried several more times then I opened up Google (on a friends computer), and saw an Apple article that it could be bad RAM. I opened up my MacBook Pro and put the RAM that it shipped with in, and removed the aftermarket RAM. I tried the Leopard install again and it went through, everything ran successfully. I thought that I was out of the woods. I plugged my Time Machine volume back in, and because I remember Steve talking about how it was just a directory, I could copy the files back. That was mistake number 1. So I started copying files back (drag and drop) in the Finder. Okay I got everything back to my internal hard-drive I deleted the back-ups from the previous install on the drive (the Time Machine folders).
From this point on I entered what I would like to call Access Control List ****. I noticed that I was having to enter my password just to rename or modify the tags (in the case of an MP3). I didn’t know what was going on. So I first started looking at file permissions on Google, and I even downloaded two different program to try to reset file permissions on each individual file. What I came to find out later is that the file permissions were being reset but there was a custom file permission that (I assume) Time Machine was appending to the file when it did its backups. When I copied the files back I opened the file info and noticed that it said I has custom access. I thought that was odd considering that my individual permissions were set on Read/Write. So I spent about 2 hours fighting with it trying to reset permissions (through changing the permission on a top-level directory and then clicking apply to enclosed items). That applied the setting but didn’t remove the custom access setting that was lingering on the files.
At this point I was getting fed up, getting ready to dump Leopard and (god forbid) go back to Windows, but I couldn’t because all of my files were on a drive that was in a GUID partition table, and formatted with HFS+J. Well, I call Apple tech support (waited on hold for 35 minutes) and then they walked me through setting file permissions, then creating a new account, owning the files with the new account, and then re-owning the files with my account, that should have worked but it didn’t. The ACLs were being reset to my account, but the others weren’t. So I sat down and thought about everything they told me. I even tried the terminal command that sets file permissions (sudo chown account –R … something.) I got to thinking that it could be corrupted ACLs. I then hit Google, and found an obscure terminal command (I do not pretend to know what I am doing in the Terminal, and I do not have a complete understanding of how this command works (I will put it at the bottom)). I then ran it on the folders to clear out the “corrupted” ACLs for the files in the folders (such as Music, Pictures, Movies and so on). That worked, I then had read/write permissions to all of my files. So I hope that this will be able to help someone else out so that the do not waste a day trying to figure out what is going on like I did.
Command:
Credit for this goes to haguejosh (Josh Hague) from a comment posted to the following article: http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=20070501065737278
(Please remember to use caution in the Terminal, incorrect spacing in the command can do bad things).
Without quotes:
“find PATHTOYOURDIRECTORY -depth -exec chmod -a# 0 {} \;”
If I am wrong or completely of base, please tell me as I would like to learn about how the Mac OS works internally.

Yes!
Here's a response from Intego...
"Hello,
You will want to add your Time Machine drive to VirusBarrier X5's Trusted Zone so that the items are not scanned as Time Machine reads and copies to that directory.
You can either do this in VirusBarrier X5's Preferences, under the "Scanner" section.
Or you can add it using the contextual menu by holding down the Control key and clicking on the Time Machine backup volume. A pop-up menu will appear, in the "More" submenu is a submenu for "VirusBarrier X5" with a choice of "Add to Trusted Zone". Choosing this will add the item to VirusBarrier's Trusted Zone and keep it from being scanned by the background scanner.
Thank you for choosing Intego."

Similar Messages

  • Bad experience with Verizon Fios Internet and Customer Service

    I had an extremely bad experience with Verizon Fios Internet service and I will never use Verizon again. 
    In August 2014, I called and installed the Verizon Fios Internet and phone bundle. I asked the customer agent several times if I will be charged anything before the installation of the Internet and phone service. She said, 'No, we will only start charging after the Internet and phone are installed at your apartment'. I went to the store and picked up the router and phone and installed it at home by myself. The router did not work. I called Tech support and they said it will take several days for another available agent to come and look into the issue. I decided to discontinue the service and closed the account that same night.
    At the end of the month, I received a bill of $80 of activation fee for the internet service. Nothing was ever activated, my internet router did not work, and I got charged an activation fee for a service that I did not even start using. From August to December, I called customer service over 10 times and some of them said they will waive it while the others said it's a non-refundable activation fee. One lady said, 'Ma'am, the activation fee starts when you placed the order, the warehouse received it and packed the router in the boxes....' Isn't that ridiculous? If that's the case, please ask all your customer representative to say a clause before new customers open their account: Are you aware that you will be charged a non-refundable activation fee once you open the account regardless of whether or not you use the service or not. 
    So after 3 months (November 2014), I decided to get out of all these troubles and paid off my $80 activation fee. They put the bill in the collection agency and I called them and paid the overdue balance. Then in December 2014, I received a statement saying I have a $3.11 overdue balance. The collection agency told me that they will charge me for the whole activation fee and a $3 transaction fee for the transaction. So now Verizon came back and said I owed them the $3 because I paid the collection agency their transaction fee. 
    I am very disappointed and furious about the whole Verizon operating system. Charging a customer for an activation fee for a service s/he has not consumed or used does not make any business sense. In addition, they do not know how to coordinate with the collection agency on overdue bills. Give the customer a heads-up that they will be charged a transaction fee on top of the overdue balance, and that transaction fee does not count towards clearing the balance. 
    I have completely lost my confidence in Verizon albeit the many good feedback from my friends. 

    Hi crystallau52,
    Sorry you are having difficulty. An agent with access to your account will reach out to you directly by email, private message in the Forums and/or the billing telephone number on your Verizon account for more information or to help you resolve your issue.

  • Recently upgraded Mac 24" to Lion (clean install) and now no external hard disks work with Time Machine

    Recently upgraded Mac 24" to Lion (clean install) and now no external hard disks work with Time Machine.
    installed new internal disk first with fresh 10.7.3 Lion software. Also upgrade ram to 4GB. Work great, super fast.
    BUT.... my WD 1TB firewire400 external disks no longer work with the Lion enabled machine now.
    FURTHER... I read somewhere that WD is problematic with Lion but Seagate was not... so I went and bought a new 3TB Seagate GoFlex.
    When it didnt work properly either, I patiently searched and found a software/firward upgrade and applied.
    I re-partitioned disk to extened/journaled standard, etc.
    Then assigned the particition to Time Machine. Drive turned the blue/grey color, so I thought it would work.
    But, it has now been in "preparing" mode in Time Machine for HOURS....
    What is up Apple? So dissappointed. Ive read these type of problems are notorious with Lion and I wish I never upgraded.
    Are you trying to make issues with External disks, to drive people to iCloud?  That trick ont work in me. I will not reward bad behaviour Apple.
    Please provide a fix... I wasted hours/days screwing around with this, instead of using the Mac for what its intended!

    Solved by Pondini, on another thread I opened...
    Answer:
    Sounds like either:
    A directory problem on your internal HD.  Verify your internal HD, and Repair any other volumes being backed-up per #A5 in Time Machine - Troubleshooting.
    Something in OSX may be damaged.  You've tried the "combo," so a fresh copy of OSX (that won't disturb anything else) would be worth a try (and you don't need a tech for that).  See Installing the ''combo'' update and/or Reinstalling OSX.

  • I'm not bald yet, but will be after messing with Time Machine

    Intel iMac Rev B. Two external drives, both less than 6 months old, one less than a week old. Maxtor 750GB, Seagate Freeagent Pro 1TB (bought last week).
    Per previous support posts, Time Machine stopped working smoothly after my update from 10.5.2 to 10.5.3. After working that issue out, it seemed to be working again.
    Long story short, I can't get TM to work on either drive. I have erased, re-partitioned (in the correct format for the Intel iMac), restarted TM and I get a multitude of issues. Sometimes the initial back up goes through, sometimes it doesn't. Sometimes the backups work as they should for a week, and sometimes, stop working after the first incremental backup.
    I went out last week and bought the Seagate to confirm the problem wasn't a hard drive issue. I'm finding it next to impossible that I've got two bad drives that won't work with Time Machine, so I clearly think this is an Apple Software issue. As now I've got the Maxtor drive partitioned and doing A and B backups with SuperDuper.
    It's getting expensive buying external harddrives. What other support for Time Machine is out there?
    **Note - I have not applied the latest 10.5.5 update yet....anybody find that Time Machine works better with that update??**
    Thanks.
    CP

    I let TM run through the night, here are another set of errors:
    9/17/08 8:27:45 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4519] Starting standard backup
    9/17/08 8:27:45 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4519] Volume at path /Volumes/Untitled 1 does not appear to be the correct backup volume for this computer. (Cookies do not match)
    9/17/08 8:27:51 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4519] Backup failed with error: 18
    9/17/08 8:28:41 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4519] Backup requested by user
    9/17/08 8:28:41 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4519] Starting standard backup
    9/17/08 8:28:42 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4519] Backing up to: /Volumes/Untitled 1/Backups.backupdb
    9/17/08 8:28:42 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4519] Ownership is disabled on the backup destination volume. Enabling.
    9/17/08 8:28:43 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4519] Event store UUIDs don't match for volume: Macintosh HD
    9/17/08 8:28:48 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4519] Backup content size: 225.7 GB excluded items size: 2.1 GB for volume Macintosh HD
    9/17/08 8:28:48 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4519] No pre-backup thinning needed: 268.30 GB requested (including padding), 931.15 GB available
    9/17/08 8:28:48 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4519] Waiting for index to be ready (909 > 0)
    9/17/08 8:30:13 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4519] Error: (-36) copying /Applications/Amadeus II.app/Contents/Resources/spec.icns to /Volumes/Untitled 1/Backups.backupdb/cpstaley/2008-09-17-202843.inProgress/C156F7E0-03C5-4759-A57 4-17A29DFC28AA/Macintosh HD/Applications/Amadeus II.app/Contents/Resources
    9/17/08 8:30:13 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4519] Stopping backup.
    9/17/08 8:30:14 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4519] Error: (-8062) copying /Applications/Amadeus II.app/Contents/Resources/spec.icns to /Volumes/Untitled 1/Backups.backupdb/cpstaley/2008-09-17-202843.inProgress/C156F7E0-03C5-4759-A57 4-17A29DFC28AA/Macintosh HD/Applications/Amadeus II.app/Contents/Resources
    9/17/08 8:30:15 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4519] Copied 6 files (184.0 MB) from volume Macintosh HD.
    9/17/08 8:30:15 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4519] Copy stage failed with error:11
    9/17/08 8:30:21 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4519] Backup failed with error: 11
    9/17/08 8:39:07 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4552] Starting standard backup
    9/17/08 8:39:08 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4552] Volume at path /Volumes/Untitled 1 does not appear to be the correct backup volume for this computer. (Cookies do not match)
    9/17/08 8:39:13 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4552] Backup failed with error: 18
    9/17/08 8:50:31 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Backup requested by user
    9/17/08 8:50:31 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Starting standard backup
    9/17/08 8:50:44 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Backing up to: /Volumes/Untitled 1/Backups.backupdb
    9/17/08 8:50:46 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Event store UUIDs don't match for volume: Macintosh HD
    9/17/08 8:51:07 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Backup content size: 225.7 GB excluded items size: 2.1 GB for volume Macintosh HD
    9/17/08 8:51:07 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] No pre-backup thinning needed: 268.30 GB requested (including padding), 930.96 GB available
    9/17/08 10:55:09 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Error: (-36) copying /Users/cpstaley/Desktop/Downloads Folder/Mid-A 2007/Pictures/mida06plcv.tif to /Volumes/Untitled 1/Backups.backupdb/cpstaley/2008-09-17-202843.inProgress/8BE09425-3E04-4BB8-A73 2-B4ED95F162E1/Macintosh HD/Users/cpstaley/Desktop/Downloads Folder/Mid-A 2007/Pictures
    9/17/08 10:55:09 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Stopping backup.
    9/17/08 10:55:09 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Error: (-8062) copying /Users/cpstaley/Desktop/Downloads Folder/Mid-A 2007/Pictures/mida06plcv.tif to /Volumes/Untitled 1/Backups.backupdb/cpstaley/2008-09-17-202843.inProgress/8BE09425-3E04-4BB8-A73 2-B4ED95F162E1/Macintosh HD/Users/cpstaley/Desktop/Downloads Folder/Mid-A 2007/Pictures
    9/17/08 10:55:09 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Copied 96097 files (22.9 GB) from volume Macintosh HD.
    9/17/08 10:55:09 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Copy stage failed with error:11
    9/17/08 10:55:15 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Backup failed with error: 11
    9/17/08 11:39:07 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Starting standard backup
    9/17/08 11:39:19 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Volume at path /Volumes/Untitled 1 does not appear to be the correct backup volume for this computer. (Cookies do not match)
    9/17/08 11:39:24 PM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Backup failed with error: 18
    9/18/08 12:39:06 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Starting standard backup
    9/18/08 12:39:18 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Volume at path /Volumes/Untitled 1 does not appear to be the correct backup volume for this computer. (Cookies do not match)
    9/18/08 12:39:23 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Backup failed with error: 18
    9/18/08 1:39:06 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Starting standard backup
    9/18/08 1:39:18 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Volume at path /Volumes/Untitled 1 does not appear to be the correct backup volume for this computer. (Cookies do not match)
    9/18/08 1:39:23 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Backup failed with error: 18
    9/18/08 2:39:06 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Starting standard backup
    9/18/08 2:39:18 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Volume at path /Volumes/Untitled 1 does not appear to be the correct backup volume for this computer. (Cookies do not match)
    9/18/08 2:39:23 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Backup failed with error: 18
    9/18/08 3:39:05 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Starting standard backup
    9/18/08 3:39:18 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Volume at path /Volumes/Untitled 1 does not appear to be the correct backup volume for this computer. (Cookies do not match)
    9/18/08 3:39:23 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Backup failed with error: 18
    9/18/08 4:39:05 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Starting standard backup
    9/18/08 4:39:17 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Volume at path /Volumes/Untitled 1 does not appear to be the correct backup volume for this computer. (Cookies do not match)
    9/18/08 4:39:22 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Backup failed with error: 18
    9/18/08 5:39:05 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Starting standard backup
    9/18/08 5:39:17 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Volume at path /Volumes/Untitled 1 does not appear to be the correct backup volume for this computer. (Cookies do not match)
    9/18/08 5:39:22 AM /System/Library/CoreServices/backupd[4563] Backup failed with error: 18
    I'm backing up again with SUperDuper and then will move onto 10.5.5. Hopefully the errors are resolved with the update.
    CP

  • Perfect Hard Drive To Use With Time Machine?

    Hi,
    Has anyone found out what's the perfect External Hard Drive to use with Time Machine?
    I have experience with a few of WD's My Book models (Essential, Pro and Studio). The problem with all of them is that they automatically keep switching themselves off (spin down) and on (spin up) throughout the day, in an effort to save power. But it's actually quite annoying. The My Book drive will automatically turn itself off, and then turn back on again within the space of one minute. Also, going to use Spotlight (even if you've excluded Time Machine Backups from being indexed) will automatically prompt the My Book drive to turn back on, which introduces a small delay to using Spotlight.
    Does anyone make an External Hard Drive, with a Firewire 400 or 800 connection, that stays on ALL the time and doesn't automatically make decisions about when it should spin down or spin up?

    I'am using a 500Gb Freecom Pro Hard Drive connected on USB via my Cinema Display. I so forget about it that I often forget to disconnect it from my laptop before leaving the office... Never complained about it
    Btw, it does not implements the energy saver Auto turn off/on feature which I don't need cause the time it could mostly be really useful is by night. As it stops when I disconnect the USB and start again when I connect it back.. this is perfect to me.
    I must say I'm quite happy with every Freecom product I bought and this one certainly don't break the rule

  • External hard drive to use with Time Machine? Thoughts?  Mac newbie.

    Hello. Switched to an imac and have loved the experience. Was just about to buy an external hard drive when apple announced the time capsule. I've been holding off thinking I would purchase one but now I'm re-thinking it.
    Between music, videos and pictures, I currently have about 400gb of stuff (and it will grow). My main concern is backing up (archiving) a copy of these files. Backing up other system files is a second concern after that.
    I'm thinking of buying a 1TB external hard drive, firewire capable, partitioning part of it to be an archive drive, and the other part to use with time machine. Skip the time capsule.
    Will that work? Other recommendations?
    If so, any recommendations on a quiet, reasonably sized (i.e. doesn't take up the entire corner of the desk), 1tb external hard drive?
    Thanks.

    Clayton, if you're only backing up one Mac, then you can purchase any good, reputable 750 GB or 1 TB external drive.
    Considerations:
    1) Reliability is key here. You want a drive that works. Various people have complained about Western Digital (me included), so take that into consideration.
    2) Quiet is important. You have a quiet computer -- why louse up the working environment with a noisy drive?
    3) FW (Firewire) 800 is faster than FW400, which is faster than USB. But once you get the initial backup done, it really doesn't matter how fast the drive is, because it works in the background and doesn't hamper your work. And if you DO need to restore your entire computer via Time Machine (I've done it), speed is less important than reliability. Even if it takes 3 hours, you'll be grateful. So while some may counsel you to get a 'fast' drive, reliability is more important.
    4) On FW versus USB, you'll hear many claims. Again the key is reliability versus speed. A good USB drive is fine for what you are doing; FW is faster. Some folks have had problems with one or the other, so hear what they have to say.
    5) Every drive dies. That's true for any electromechanical device. Don't think you've solved your backup problems by plugging in a drive and walking away. Your most critical files need a second backup, be it to a DVD, CD, thumb drive, network drive -- something. The more critical it is, the more backups you need. If you're writing your Ph.D. thesis, by definition you can't have too many backups
    6) Convenience matters. You can 'roll your own' drive if you have experience -- buy a case, buy a drive, assemble, etc. But it's many times easier, particularly for a Time Machine backup drive, to just buy a reliable (there's that word again) external HD off the shelf.
    7) Finally, follow directions. Apple tells you how to set up a TM drive. Do it their way. That means, format the brand new drive and make it a 'GUID' partition. Use the Apple Disk Utility. Follow directions.
    Good luck,
    Steve

  • Trouble with Time Machine (runs constantly). Erase and install?

    Trouble with Time Machine (runs constantly). Tried re-installation (equivalent of archive install) of Snow Leopard. Time Machine still unable to complete a back-up. Erase and install recommended at Genius Bar. Have backed up data to external HD using Super Duper. Should be a bootable backup. Last successful backup through Time Machine was 6/1/11. Not sure if I can access this back-up if I erase and re-install.
    Computer shipped with Tiger (7/2007). Have original disks. Now running Snow Leopard. So: erase HD, install Tiger, then update to Snow Leopard? Start-up from Tiger disks does not appear to work (starting up holding "C" key). Suggestions? Want very much to transfer data to new iMac, but do not want to carry bugs forward. Very nervous about erasing HD. And have the questions above about reinstalling system software.
    Advice desired! Thanks.

    Well if you can hold option and boot off the Superdupes clone and it works fine then you should be set to do what you need to do to the original boot drive.
    Disconnect all drives and c boot off the Snow Leopard install disk, use Disk Utility to Erase > format HFS+ journaled your internal boot drive.
    Quit and reinstall OS X Snow Leopard, setup (do not use Setup/Migration Assitant!) and update to 10.6.8
    When you setup the new install, use the same hard drive name and user name as you did before.
    Now the free iLife that came on the Tiger disks you won't get naturally, but you can pick them off the disk with the shareware program called Pacifist.
    install your programs from fresh sources, this way you don't get the "crap" from the older setup.
    Once your machine is up and going. Hook up the clone and transfer your user folders over manually. With iTunes just replace the whole folder. Because you kept the same user and boot drive name as before, the playlists should be fine.
    Once your all peachy, take the opportunity to clone this new setup to a external drive, label and disconnect.
    Make another clone for day to day, or week to week clone updates and your just a hold option boot away for recovery.
    You know Superdupes and Carbon Copy Cloner both have auto-scedualing/updating ability, so you can leave them plugged in and it will perform a update so your clone stays fresh and recent.
    But you should keep a clone timed back about a couple of weeks back just in case you install something bad and don't learn about it right away.

  • HT201250 Is there a size limit for an external drive to be used with time machine?

    I have an iMac with a 2TB drive. I have a 2TB WD drive used for Time Machine that is full. I would like to go to the bigest WD (type) external drive that will work with Time Machine. Is there a TB limit for TM in OS X Lion?

    Welcome .  I have also used a 2TB WD My Book ext HDD for Time Machine backups for the past year and have had no problems.  They seem to get a  very bad wrap.  Perhaps we are a few of the lucky ones.  The two brands recommended by macjack are very, very good brands.

  • What external hard drives work best with time machine

    What is the best external drive that is compatible with time machine? 

    I see a lot of people on the Apple Discussion boards mention Time Capsule. The experience I've heard from folks with the First gen units was terrible. Poorly designed, poorly manufactured (sorry Apple!). They suffered all kinds of heat stress failures etc. The follow up devices are supposed to better, but I don't think it's mandatory you buy Apple product to run Time Machine. In fact choose based on price/capacity, then possibly on Manufacturers reputation. I use a external USB dock that has a Serial ATA connector on it. That way I can swap drives out when/if they fail or get full. That way I KNOW who manufactured the actual drive itself. Often times if you get a Time Capsule the drive manufacturer is the "flavor of the month" so to speak. There's a number of outfits that make these bare SATA style docks, and you can connect them through USB (which I have) or higher speed connectors like FireWire 800 (for faster reads/writes/backups). My best recommendation is to buy one of those SATA dock devices, then buy a bare hard drive from a reputable manufacturer. Then setup Time Machine and use the left over space that it doesn't use for your growing iPhoto collection? Use your best judgement, as there's no real right/wrong way.

  • My disappointment with Time Machine

    I was really looking forward to Time Machine. But having set it up, I'm somewhat disappointed. Why? Because once again, Apple gets us so close to nirvana, then we hit the brick wall. The software is awesome. I love the interface. It really does make backup easy.
    So what do I not like about it? Lets start with the lack of network storage. I was willing to let this go for now since I don't even have any network storage yet. I have an external 320GB FW800 drive. Perfect, right? Not so fast. Since I just installed Leopard, I haven't even copied all my data back to my desktop. I started up Time Machine on my external drive and immediately it said I didn't have enough room to backup. Thats not good. I haven't even copied video back to my system yet. Thats about 200GB's by itself. So now if I want to use Time Machine with the amount of data I have, I will need to probably get a 750GB external hard drive. Prices start around $300. Wonderful. I'd really rather spend that money on network storage than another external drive. I'm starting to think Amazon's S3 storage isn't so bad after all. 300GB of storage per month will run about $45 a month not including bandwith. And its offsite.
    Ultimately, I'm waiting for some consumer network storage that uses ZFS instead of RAID.

    If it's a MS-DOS filesystem then it's not going to work with Time Machine. You need a HFS (partitioned or not) drive. I have an internal 250G drive that I back up my 80G drive to. Even then you can always use the extra space for other stuff like my video projects (Final Cut Pro).
    As for the network backup: there are hacks to it already (look around) but the problem (I think) is that the network layer abstracts the 'raw' volume information so if Time Machine uses specific HFS functionality then the network layer will abstract that into NFS and SMB which those protocols don't understand those functions.
    It's possible that you can repartition your drive without losing your data but you'll need special tools for that. I wouldn't risk it, invest in a decent firewire drive and use it as a Time Machine drive. Time Machine will detect automatically when it's connected and start a backup in the background. It's really smooth, you don't notice anything about it.

  • Grey screen issue with 10.5 & 10.5.1 - bad experience with Leopard

    Here's a quick overview of my bad experience with installing Leopard:
    *1st attempt:* Upgraded Tiger 10.4.10, was greeted with the blue screen. This was an APE issue.
    *2nd attempt:* Archive and installed above install. This is where the continuing issue first occurred. The issue being on the first or second reboot after a 'successful' installation, I get the grey screen and spinning gear loop. In verbose mode I see this recurring loop:
    Mez com.apple.launchd[1] (com.apple.nDNSResponder |xxx|) : posix_spawnp("usr/sbin/mDNSResponder", ...): No such file or directory
    xxx = incremental value, it adds 1 each time the error cycles, which happens roughly ever 10 seconds).
    Additionally, Disk Utility reports this error: Error: The underlying task reported failure on exit.
    *3rd attempt:* Erase and install. Same issue as 2nd attempt occured.
    *4th, 5th, 6th attempts:* Bought a brand new hard drive to replace the old one. This was an idea that was raised on another one of my threads. People thought I could have bad sectors. Tried upgrading and archive install from 10.4, no. Erase and install, no. Same issue as before.
    *7th attempt:* Tried swapping out the RAM from a friends MBP (who has successfully upgraded to Leopard). No, same failure as before.
    *8th attempt:* Tried using his Leopard disk. NO!
    *9th attempt:* My last attempt so far... Erase and install, then applied the 10.5.1 update. It all went well, but it always has, until the point where I reboot. It successfully rebooted once, but to be sure all was fine (before using the migration assistant) I rebooted again... Oh what a surprise, it doesn't work anymore. Same enraging loop.
    *Any new ideas people, I have faith that there is some genius out there who can provide me with a solution. I will love you forever if you can help me.*
    *Quick question:* Do other people see the dialogue box that appears before the computer restarts...
    "Updating Boot Caches - The Boot caches are being updated, the system will shutdown when this task is complete" (It's sort of along those lines. I don't have enough time to write down exactly what it says)??
    Oh well, back to my newest backup (10.4.11).
    *Fingers crossed for 10.5.2 :D*

    THANK YOU!!! At least preliminarily...
    I've spent the last three hours researching and troubleshooting my greyscreen dilemma, and your post is the only one that seemed to work so far.
    I installed Leopard 10.5 onto my G4 Dual 1.25 Mirror, successfully restarted after the install, then had glitchy problems including being unable to run Software Update or even run the Leopard Update after downloading it from the apple website. So I restarted the computer (after removing the Install DVD and shutting the drive door) and found myself stuck at the grey screen with the spinning ball.
    Nothing worked. I couldn't do anything to get it to boot.
    After researching, I booted into single user mode and ran mount -o rw,remount / # (from this thread: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=5796214&#5796214) and when I exited and it began to boot I saw it get stuck at mDNSResponder line prompt, repeating the line prompt every 5 seconds or so and never getting anywhere.
    Then I found your post and changed permissions as you mentioned, exited and it booted up successfully. I then immediately ran Software Update and installed the Leopard 10.5.1 update and now all is well again.
    Insane for this to be required. I barely know what single user means and would have sent this computer in to Apple if I hadn't found your solution.
    Hopefully the next person who searches on this problem will find this and save themselves a horror story too. Thanks again.
    Jeff

  • Considering FileVault usage on an iMac with OSX 10.6.7. Wanting to know more about strengths and weaknesses of Filevault with Time Machine, Parallels and Carbon Copy Cloner. Any negatives to consider before flipping the switch?

    I'm considering FileVault usage on an iMac with OSX 10.6.7. Wanting to know more about strengths and weaknesses of Filevault with Time Machine, Parallels and Carbon Copy Cloner. Any negatives to consider before flipping the switch? Any information ?
    Would specifically like to know:
    Filevault impact on performance and application usability.
    TIme machine impacts, and whether TIme Machine volume will also be secure?
    Will a Cloned copy made with CCC be  bootable, or usable?
    Any other negatives to consider before turning this thing on?
    Thanks,

    Filevault impact on performance and application usability.
    FileVault encrypts the user's home directory only - it is basically an encrypted disk image that is automatically opened when you log in and closed when you log out. It does cause disk accesses to be a bit slower so it isn't a good idea to use an encrypted account with sound or video or large graphics files. I have no experience with it with Parallels Desktop but suspect that you'd notice a bit of a slowdown. Note: in the User's directory you'll see a Shared Folder. Since FV only encrypts the user's directory you can put data you don't need encrypted in this shared folder which won't be encrypted.
    TIme machine impacts, and whether TIme Machine volume will also be secure?
    There are issues with TM and FV but how extensive they are with Snow Leopard I can't say, once I realized that TM and FV hadn't substantially changed between 10.5 and 10.6 I stopped dealing with it. When FV and TM were first introduced my testing led me to recommend using CCC or SuperDuper! for backing up.
    Will a Cloned copy made with CCC be  bootable, or usable?
    Yes
    Any other negatives to consider before turning this thing on?
    Since FV is nothing more than a disk image - and disk images can fail - there are several problems with FV in my opinion. If an encrypted disk image fails it isn't possible to access any of that data. If you don't have a recent (undamaged) backup of the disk image and/or recent backup of the data within the disk image you are in a world of hurt. This isn't just a warning of possibility - this is a real danger that I've seen all too often at the shop where I have worked part time for a number of years.
    At this time I strongly recommend that people who have sensitive data keep that sensitive data segregated from their general data and encrypt only the sensitive data or use other methods of locking it down such as saving on an external drive that is kept in a safe. Call me paranoid but I don't even keep all my sensitive data in one encrypted disk image. I use multiple disk images and keep multiple sequential backups. That way I might someday find that my up-to-date investments disk image won't mount but (a) I can go back a week to a backup and (b) that won't impact my up-to-date business records because those are in a different disk image

  • Does filevault encryption work with time machine?

    Filevault under Snow Leopard would allow you to encrypt data on your Mac disk but was not compatible with Time Machine i.e. you could not back it up once encrypted or restore it.
    Does anyone know if this has been addressed in Lion i.e. data encrypted in Filevault is capable of being backed up to a time capsule and is recoverable using Time Machine. 
    The release documentation does not make this clear, although a technician led me to believe it would be fixed in Lion.

    According to my experience and to this -> http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1427, FileVault in Snow Leopard was compatible with Time Machine.
    The thing was that, as FileVault encrypts your home folder as a disk image in 10.6, Time Machine was backing up that encrypted disk image. So
    1. Time Machine could backup your home folder only when you were not logged in your user session and the computer was awake
    2. with this system, you could not browse your home folder in the Time Machine incremental backups, but could only restore your complete home folder from that encrypted disk image.
    In Lion, however, Filevault 2 encrypts your complete hard drive.
    This means:
    1. You can use Time Machine with FileVault 2 enabled in Lion (http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4811)
    2. Recovery HD must be present on your computer's startup volume to use FileVault 2 (not an external Recovery HD) (http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4718)
    I guess Time Machine, like it used to do with the user's home folder in 10.6, will backup your encrypted hard drive in Lion, but you will not have the ability to browse your Time Machine backup to find specific files / folders in the backup. But this backup can be used to restore your system. (http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4811)
    (May someone correct me if I'm mistaken there ?)
    More info about FileVault 2 in Lion -> http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4790

  • What har drive is recommended to work with Time Machine smoothly?

    What hard drive - other than Time Capsule - works smoothly with Time Machine? I'm looking for one that is a little less expensive that Time Capsule but will work as well with Time Machine.
    Thanks for your help.
    Vernon

    Most any drive will work with Macs, and Time Machine.
    Most drives come formatted for Windoze, but most of them can be re-formatted on your Mac to work with it. See item #5 in the Frequently Asked Questions *User Tip* at the top of this forum.
    Also note item #1 there for size considerations; and items #3 and/or 4 for using with other data and/or other Macs.
    If you think you ever might want to put a "bootable clone" on it, be sure it's a bootable drive (some WDs aren't). Most PPC Macs can boot only from FireWire; most Intels can boot from F/W or USB.
    Depending on what ports you have, FireWire 800 is by far the fastest; FireWire 400 next, and USB slowest (F/W 400 and USB 2.0 are rated about the same, but since your Mac's CPU has to do more of the work with USB, actual throughput is usually less).
    Many folks think USB is less reliable than FireWire. If you do get USB, be sure to connect it to a port on your Mac, not a keyboard (that's USB 1.0). Try to avoid hubs, too.
    It's usually best to get a drive with it's own power supply, as taking power from your Mac can be a marginal proposition.
    Take any advice for or against particular makes or models with a grain of salt: all makers (of just about anything) can have a "run" of bad components, or a relatively few early failures. Plus, by the time any really good trends are noted, the model has probably been revised or replaced anyway!

  • Can I replace hard drive with Time Machine backup?

    I couldn't phrase this right to see if some already asked. I have MacBook with a 250gb HDD and I have a new 500gb HDD. I bought a USB Hard Drive enclosure and have been backing up with Time Machine. So my question is, can I take out my 250gb HDD and put in my Time Machine Backed Up 500gb, and boot up like normal? Or are there some steps I need to do?

    No, you cannot do what you've asked.
    What you can do is this.
    1) using your install DVDs or an install USB, install OSX on the external 500GB drive.   When setup assistant starts, point it to your 250GB drive so all your settings and files get migrated over.
    2) now you can swap drives and it should work.  Have your install USB handy incase something goes wrong.  Put the 250GB drive in your external enclosure so you can access it if needed for a reinstall.
    good luck

Maybe you are looking for