N 97 : poor performance & Pathetic service

Hello,   I have been a happy Nokia Customer and have owned several Nokia products for last 12 years. I have run into a series of problems after buying Nokia N97 (Product code:RM505, Seller : Hot Spot GIP Opp Sec-18, Noida, Invoice No:376, Dated 04.08.09).   I would like to narrate the events over last month that have left me in a lurch:  
After much deliberation on phone pricing, I made up my mind and bought the phone on 4 th August’2009. The moment I stepped out of the market place, I had the first experience of phone not responding to any key strokes. Little unhappy, I restarted the phone and thought it could be one-off problem that will not happen again, considering the amount of advertising and pride Nokia has shown into this set.
Next 2-3 days I experienced the same problem On / Off and I was little unhappy over the experience.
I called up HotSpot guys and asked for their help. The gentleman on phone asked me for some settings change and assured that phone will work properly that point onwards. This did not help much and I ended up calling these guys 4-5 times in these many days.
After ping-pong of phone calls, I called up Nokia Help line seeking their help. Spending hours on this did not help either and ultimately I was advised to visit Nokia Customer Care SHEETLA WLL SERVICES, Sec 14, Gurgaon on 03 rd Sep’09 .
After waiting for more than an hour I was asked to return in a day’s time. Next day I got a call from Nokia about the phone repair assuring that the phone has been repaired and tested well for all functions.
I visited customer care again on 5 th Sep’09 to collect the phone and to my dismay the phone hanged the moment I switched it ON. I waited again for another hour, just to hear from service center that the phone would be sent to Head Quarter Service Center ( Delhi ) for fault fixing.
All communication since then says ‘Earliest Possible’, ‘Regret’, etc with no proper dates, proposed action, etc.
With phone sent to some service center and no updates, it is left to the poor customer to do all the chasing.
  As a responsible organization that has supposedly high Quality and Customer Satisfaction standards, I would like to convey NOKIA that please do not make me realize that I have done a blunder by buying a Nokia N97phone. It is not a good feeling to see your flashy ads all around. After all these events the only request I have is to return my money back. I promise that I would not look back at Nokia or any of its products in future.   I sincerely hope that there is somebody in NOKIA listening to the cries of the customer.     Sudhanshu
Moderator note: IMEI and phone number removed. It is unwise to publish personal contact info and unique serial numbers on the public boards.
Message Edited by michaels on 08-Sep-2009 11:49 AM

Dear sv2397,
Your problems started on 04.08.09.
Welcome to the club.
Unlike you, many of us bought our N97 on the first day, first weeks when N97 was launch.
We encounted lots of problems, which we learn to solve it one at a time.
We have over this 3 months or so, became beta-tester for nokia, sometime understanding N97 better then Nokia.
Look through the forum, where you will find alot of help on N97.  Welcome.

Similar Messages

  • Pathetic service by Service centre in ahmedabad and blackberry

    hi
    i purchased a BLackbery Z10 last month but in few days its was not performing well so i gave it to the service centre for repairing . the concerned person told that there is a serious problem but dont worry we will replace this handset with a new one.
    i gave  the handset at the service centre i.e redington india pvt ltd in AHMEDABAD on 5/7/2014 , but still they are not delevering a new handset . its about to be a month but still the service centre people are not giving a proper response saying that the model is out os atock and will be still delayed .
    i am Journalist in TIMES OF INDIA  and hence require a handset for mailing and buying BLACKBERRY has tried to prove to myself a big mistake as because of the Pathetic service and Extremely poor after sales support
    If I am not geeting a new and defect free handset in this week,  m filling a complaint against blackberry and the concerned  service centre REDINGTON INDIA ahmedabad  at CONSUMER FORUM  for providing me a defective handset and not giving a proper service for replacement as its a month as folling the customer by fake promises done before purchase
    the competitor like SAMSUNG AND APPLE have a customer policy of max to max 5 day replacement against defective handset .
    I will Also apply an RTI as journalist of TIMES OF INDIA for providing data of people in ahmedabad who got such defective pieces and will write a column in my Newspaper TIMES OF INDIA as for TRIAL OF MEDIA

    Hi and Welcome to the Community!!!
    Please understand that this site is a volunteer-contributed user-to-user community; it has nothing whatsoever to do with any of your formal support channels. We therefore cannot truly answer your questions with any level of authority whatsoever. We do not work for BlackBerry, we do not work for your carrier, we do not work for your service center, we do not work for your reseller...we are just other users, like you, who volunteer time to try and help out as best we can. This information is part of the Ts and Cs to which everyone agrees when signing up here, and is supported by this banner displayed at the top of nearly every page of the site
    http://supportforums.blackberry.com/t5/Social-Lounge/How-This-Site-Works-e-g-Volunteers/td-p/2540525

  • Poor Performance of Blackberry 9860-Torch Model RDP71UW

    This is to inform you regarding my sincere concern over the blackberry product. I had bought a new blackberry torch 9860 11 months back and since then am facing problems because of the poor performance of the handset. During this period I have taken this handset 4times for servicing to your authorized service center. My data loss and of-course time is lost each time. Its too pathetic that I have to take the phone for service in the very first year of purchase and despite of that still has complaint. I am really sorry to say the performance of this reputed brand is far below the expectation and is poor that any cheap quality phones available in the market.
    I am least satisfied with the quality of phone and also doubtful about the other blackberry models available in the market.
    Finding no other alternative I am forced to forward this expecting a sincere reply and a solution to resolve the issues with my handset.
    Regards
    Sunil Kumar

    I'm sorry to hear of your phone issues.  Just to be clear, we're volunteers here and not actual RIM employees so any response you receive here is not directly from RIM.
    We're very good at solving issues in these forums.  If I could ask you to list any issues you're having, including what error message(s) you're seeing, what actions you performed when seeing such message(s), etc., we can tackle the issues one at a time.  Hopefully with our help, you can cancel any future trips to the service depots.
    We await your reply. 
    - If my response has helped you, please click "Options" beside my post and mark it as solved. Clicking the "thumbs up" icon near the bottom of my response would also be appreciated.

  • Grid upgrade patch 10.2.0.5 ? countless deadlock's, poor performance

    hi,
    i upgraded the grid control OMS, Repository from 10.2.0.4 to 10.2.0.5 (Windows 2003 32 bit) and it was a disaster. Countless deadlocks, poor performance, four Database CPU's who are working nearly by 100%, and an open service request
    7573665.992 with poor response. After the upgrade, parts are not functioning for example the "Large Repository option" (see patch 8321694).
    We have a big repository 1100 endpoint agents. The upload process is not functioning in time. we have now more than 150.000 files who are not uploaded yet.
    i am realy very disapointed about the quality of the software and the professional reaction to solve a production problem. Has oracle test this patch just with 10 agents ? I think this patch is a good stress program for hard discs producers. Send it please to IBM ...
    greetings
    Efstratios

    I had successfully applied Patch 10.2.0.5 after facing couple of days (1 week) problem and also raising SR request. Finally I did it but almost 99% of my own effort
    I have Windows 32Bit with 4 GB of RAM and MS Windows 2003 SP2 installed on that machine and I was monitoring 60 target including 20 Agent on different host.
    Before starting upgrade I was quite happy. My platform at that time was 10.2.0.4 GC and DB 10.1.0.4.
    I download the patch and start apply. It did not work. I raised SR and after two days of interval nothing resolved.
    So I decided to De-install all ( Yes you are right I De-install all including DB )
    Removed registry entry.
    Then install following.
    NOTE: Shutdown all agent services on different host otherwise during installation it searches for other host machines and we have to wait wait and wait.
    1. GC 10.2.0.2 Full Version
    2. Applied Patch 10.2.0.4
    3. Applied Patch 10.2.0.5
    During installation my CPU almost went to 100% for couple of hours. But I keep waited and it works.
    Finally I finished my installation.
    You must re-start machine after installation finishes otherwise CPU will always 100%
    No restart all agent and run emctl secure agent command on agent home.
    Then you need to re
    Right now my GC is fine but only one problem is still there I would not be able to start iasconsole service and for that I raised SR and still waiting to resolve after 2 days.
    Thanks

  • Poor Performance of Safari with YouTube

    Recently I have noticed really poor performance of Safari when I try to watch videoes on YouTube.
    I have experienced this both with my 2009 iMac desktop and my brand new MacBook Pro w/ Retina Display.
    This can't be a network problem because I pay Verizon way too much money every month for their FiOS Quantum service and various speedtests that I run look OK.
    Is the problem with Safari or what?

    You guys are not following me. And, I'm not sure if I used that term right. I was talking about answers you see from google searches, not from people here. I am a 40 year old business owner not a kid. What I meant by "fanboy" is that a lot of times when you search online for something like "Itunes on my PC is not seeing my ipod", you see the most popular answer is "Buy a mac". Yes it may be funny, but it is not really helpful. That is the type of person I was referring to, and I was not talking about people here. People on this discussion board seem to be very helpful. I own macs and PC's, so don't like the answer "get a mac". I have one (three in fact), but I also have PC's. I love my mac computers, my iPhone, my iPad, my AppleTV and all of that just like you guys probably do.
    I still think it is an interesting and strange issue. If you contacted the IE folks, they would say "Are you having this problem on all websites?". As soon as you said "No, just this one". They would say "It must be the way the website is written". If you talk to someone here, the answer might lean towards "If it runs fine on Safari, but not on IE, it must be an IE issue".
    I was just thinking it was an interesting enough scenario that someone had looked into it. Sorry if I was misunderstood and riled someone up.
    Message was edited by: Austin Rob

  • BI4 - Poor Performance

    Hi,
    I have a problem updating several reports which either time out or take ages to respond when making simple changes. It doesn't seem to matter which mode you are in while making a change (whether in data or structure mode) nor the tool used (Webi or Rich Client).
    I have read in other forums users reporting similiar problems which results in an error unable to get the first page of the report.
    To ensure it wasn't an issue inherited from a previous version of BO (as these reports were originally written in BOXI BI 3.1) I recreated the report from scratch only to hit the same issue when populating the report with various formula.
    When this occurs (i.e. the unable to get the first page of the report error occurring) I am forced to save then close the Rich Client and then have to re-open the file each and every time.
    We are currently using Business Objects BI4.0 SP6 Edge. These reports consist of some 600+ variables however they never caused this issue in the older version of BO.
    Please can someone suggest a solution to this issue as it is taking me much longer to make simple updates to these reports when it ought to be straight forward.
    Cheers
    Ian

    Hi Farzana,
    Thanks for your response. Yes, I had read this on a variety of forums and due to the poor performance wrote the report from scratch again.
    Firstly, I got the structure of the report and saved it as a template. No issues. Then add in Queries and variables. No issues. It was only when I had populated the report with the formula / calculations (after about my half way point) I started to detect performance issues again.
    This forced my hand and I used RestFUL Web Service calls to complete the rest otherwise it would of been a painful excercise. The report contains some 600+ variables as 750+ cells populated with formula calculations so it is a busy report.
    I would of thought others with complex reports may have reported similiar performance issues as this worked fine in our old BOXI v3.1 environment.

  • Project Server 2013 Poor Performance

    Hi Guys
    On a new build of Project Server, we are experiencing poor performance across the board, Site Collection, Central Admin, everything is slow.
    We have allocated 12GB and Quad core (lower end of the recommend scale). However as there are no users, I would expect it to be fine at the moment (Search is not setup or anything, just a simple service app with a pwa site provisioned).
    What things can we check? From looking on the internet, Distributed Cache crops up a lot. Can this bring performance right down?
    For the record, we have March 2013 PU and Oct 2013 CU applied.

    Hello,
    There could be a number of causes, it is very difficult to diagnose without understanding the farm infrastructure. Can you give details of:
    Number of servers in the farm + Specs
    If virtual, is the host server over committed? Have you set up reservations for memory and CPU?
    What is the storage?
    What is the network speed between servers / storage etc?
    Do you have any Anti-Virus software installed on the servers? If so, have you tested with it disabled on all servers in the farm?
    Paul
    Paul Mather | Twitter |
    http://pwmather.wordpress.com | CPS

  • Poor Performance with Fairpoint DSL

    I started using Verizon DSL for my internet connection and had no problems. When Fairpoint Communications purchased Verizon (this is in Vermont), they took over the DSL (about May 2009). Since then, I have had very poor performance with all applications as soon as I start a browser. The performance problems occur regardless of the browser - I've tried Firefox (3.5.4), Safari (4.0.3) and Opera (10.0). I've been around and around with Fairpoint for 6 months with no resolution. I have not changed any software or hardware on my Mac during that time, except for updating the browsers and Apple updates to the OS, iTunes, etc. The performance problems continued right through these updates. I've run tests to check my internet speed and get times of 2.76Mbps (download) and 0.58Mbps (upload) which are within the specified limits for the DSL service. My Mac is a 2GHz PowerPC G5 runnning OSX 10.4.11. It has 512MB DDR SDRAM. I use a Westell Model 6100 modem for the DSL provided by Verizon.
    Some of the specific problems I see are:
    1. very long waits of more than a minute after a click on an item in the menu bar
    2. very long waits of more than two minutes after a click on an item on a browser page
    3. frequent pinwheels in response to a click on a menu item/browser page item
    4. frequent pinwheels if I just move the mouse without a click
    5. frequent messages for stopped/unresponsive scripts
    6. videos (like YouTube) stop frequently for no reason; after several minutes, I'll get a little audio but no new video; eventually after several more minutes it will get going again (both video and audio)
    7. response in non-browser applications is also very slow
    8. sometimes will get no response at all to a mouse click
    9. trying to run more than one browser at a time will bring the Mac to its knees
    10. browser pages frequently take several minutes to load
    These are just some of the problems I have.
    These problems all go away and everything runs fine as soon as I stop the browser. If I start the browser, they immediately surface again. I've trying clearing the cache, etc with no improvements.
    What I would like to do is find a way to determine if the problem is in my Mac or with the Fairpoint service. Since I had no problems with Verizon and have made no changes to my Mac, I really suspect the problem lies with Fairpoint. Can anyone help me out? Thanks.

    1) Another thing that you could try it is deleting the preference files for networking. Mac OS will regenerate these files. You would then need to reconfigure your network settings.
    The list of files comes from Mac OS X 10.4.
    http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=8185915#8185915
    http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=10718694#10718694
    2) I think it is time to do a clean install of your system.
    3) It's either the software or an intermittent hardware problem.
    If money isn't an issue, I suggest an external harddrive for re-installing Mac OS.
    You need an external Firewire drive to boot a PowerPC Mac computer.
    I recommend you do a google search on any external harddrive you are looking at.
    I bought a low cost external drive enclosure. When I started having trouble with it, I did a google search and found a lot of complaints about the drive enclosure. I ended up buying a new drive enclosure. On my second go around, I decided to buy a drive enclosure with a good history of working with Macs. The chip set seems to be the key ingredient. The Oxford line of chips seems to be good. I got the Oxford 911.
    The latest the hard drive enclosures support the newer serial ata drives. The drive and closure that I list supports only older parallel ata.
    Has everything interface:
    FireWire 800/400 + USB2, + eSATA 'Quad Interface'
    save a little money interface:
    FireWire 400 + USB 2.0
    This web page lists both external harddrive types. You may need to scroll to the right to see both.
    http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/firewire/1394/USB/EliteAL/eSATAFW800_FW400USB
    Here is an external hd enclosure.
    http://eshop.macsales.com/item/Other%20World%20Computing/MEFW91UAL1K/
    Here is what one contributor recommended:
    http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=10452917#10452917
    Folks in these Mac forums recommend LaCie, OWC or G-Tech.
    Here is a list of recommended drives:
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=5564509#5564509
    FireWire compared to USB. You will find that FireWire 400 is faster than USB 2.0 when used for a external harddrive connection.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UniversalSerial_Bus#USB_compared_toFireWire
    http://www23.tomshardware.com/storageexternal.html

  • Poor Cloud storage service

    Hello,
    I'm not a big contributor of this forum or any forum in general, and not the kind of guy who complains on internet each time I've got an error message on my screen,  but this time I feel that I have to tell what I think.
    And just so you know, I am quite good in computer in general, and try to keep my system as clean and updated as possible.
    I love Adobe products which I use every day, and I was one of the first subscribers of the Creative cloud.
    I started to use the cloud service with the preview, and waited a long time before the final version.
    After approximatly 1 year of  usage I can say that Adobe Cloud storage is un-professionnal compared to other cloud services and I don't trust this cloud service anymore.
    This service is not at the core of adobe's historical activity and I can verify that every day. Feel that it was issued too early for the coherence of their offer,  and that it's still today  in beta version
    1) Poor performance and accessibility. Each time, I felt that it was longer than my dropbox account with no info on what file it is syncing. Very subjective , I agree.
    2) Wrong storage capacity information, no real time storage info update . Today my cloud is empty (0 file) as in my archive folder, and Adobe CC keeps saying that  86% of my storage is used.
    3) Frequent sync issues with file names. Fonts for my case , had to manually search for the file who was responsible
    4) No easy and reliable way to extend storage capacity. They say on the FAQ, get contact at adobe, no clear and public pricing information.
    5) Various Issues in syncing , and I still have no clue why. The only way was to delete all my 18 Go files and resync.
    6) Weird file disapearance....today still no clue
    7) Frequent errors in deleting archived files. Says there was errors in deleting.
    8) I do a lot of motion graphics and video , no way to share video stream, have to download to se the file. Weird... when they promote video production !!
    I don't want to charge Adobe for every issue I had or listed here, maybe it was my fault on some , but the overall experience was very very poor.
    So I decided to leave CC cloud and give my money to competitor, I did the first syncs on my 100Go storage  and I'm  quite satisfied so far. Hope it will continue.
    Maybe I'll switch back when Adobe will propose a more professionnal service.
    Thanks for reading me and sorry for the misuse of my english.

    cpt_paranoia wrote:
    I think the problem is the "I understand the risks" bit. The average WD user probably doesn't understand the risks; I'm not sure I do... And, sensibly, if the average user doesn't understand the risks, they are choosing not to create an exception, because they're not sure that it is safe to do so. If a browser warns me about SSL security, and tells me "legitimate banks, stores and other public websites will not ask you to do this", it doesn't give a very warm feeling about WD's security, does it...? My suspicion is that each MyCloud would require a unique certificate, and verifying those certificates is the problem. It's probably okay... Anyone have a good understanding of this issue, or know of a WD white paper on the problem?Yeah the wording will probably confuse people just as some get confused by the wording of similar certificate warning messages that crop up when logging in remotely with the WD My Cloud Desktop app. My guess is that it would cost too much money, since SSL certs are often done on a yearly or multi year basis, for WD to obtain the proper certificates for each "cloud" device they sell. It would probably happen that WD would have to institute a yearly recurring charge the customer for the cert fee, or the customer would have to pay the yearly fee to renew the security cert. By going the WD2Go.com route it allows them to have one SSL cert that all their consumer "cloud" devices can use but the trade off is the annoying and at times confusing messages people get when using the WD2Go.com site or the WD My Cloud Desktop app.

  • Db6util -rtvt extremely poor performance

    Hi all,
    I wonder if someone can assist me poor performance on renaming the virtual tables in DB6 post system copy?
    We have copied the database back from Production > QA server.  Once we have done this, we renamed the tablespaces and now have to rename the virtual tables as per note https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1227165
    However, each table rename is taking about 10 seconds to complete - with a lot of "Sort" going on.  Looking at the SQL statement, it seems to be taking a long time to Sort.  I enclose the sort time from the snapshot below of the agent's sort performance and the SQL statements.  If anything else might be useful, please let me know.
    Can anyone advise me on whether they have faced this issue / how they have resolved or improved the performance? Or is it just that slow?!
    Thanks in advance for any assitance,
    Total sorts                                = 73
    Total sort time (ms)                       = 843903
    The 2(?) dyanmic SQl statements executing are:
    SELECT TEXT FROM SYSCAT.VIEWS WHERE VIEWSCHEMA = CURRENT SCHEMA AND VALID <> 'Y' AND TEXT LIKE '%TBE00%' WITH UR
    SELECT VIEWNAME, TEXT FROM SYSCAT.VIEWS WHERE VIEWSCHEMA = CURRENT SCHEMA AND TEXT LIKE '%--DDL_TABLE%E1P#POOLD%' ORDER BY VIEWNAME WITH UR
    Thanks
    David

    Hi Frank,
    Thank you so much for getting back to me on this so quickly!
    We are using DB2 9.7 FP3 for LUW on a HP-UX environment. There is very little CPU usage and no paging at present.
    The db6util -v output is:
    This is the DB6 (DB2 UDB) utility program for SAP kernel 701.
    UNICODE compiled:                YES
    compiled for                  64 BIT
    patch level                     0004
    We have a single instance of -rtvt running and SAP is currently offline.
    I believe file system buffering is in place at the HP-UX level.
    Placing those statements into EXPLAIN we see the below - I assume the SORTS are here (though they do not seem to increase the cumulative time):
    0 SELECT STATEMENT ( Estimated Costs =  1,236E+03 [timerons] ) num_rows tot_cost i/o_cost
           1 RETURN  8.0618E02  1.2360E03  3.1655E+02
               2 TBSCAN  8.0618E02  1.2360E03  3.1655E+02
                   3 SORT  8.0618E02  1.2360E03  3.1655E+02
                       4 FETCH SYSVIEWS  8.0618E02  1.2357E03  3.1655E+02
                           5 RIDSCN  8.0618E03  1.2770E02  2.7498E+01
                               6 SORT  8.0618E03  1.2770E02  2.7498E+01
                                   7 IXSCAN INDVIEWS01 #key columns:  1  8.0618E03  1.2540E02  2.7498E+01
    I will attempt a REORG and let you know how that performs afterwards.
    Many thanks for your suggestions and if anything of the above looks concerning, please let me know!
    Thanks
    David

  • Confirm performance of Service/Goods Receipt

    We are using SRM 4.0 SRM Server 5.0 in extended classic scenario.  Our backend is a R/3 system version 4.70. 
    When changing a purchase order via transaction BBP_POC on the header data tab, go to the follow-on documents.  At the top of this screen is a Document Ctrl section.  There is a box titled "Confirm Performance of Service/Goods Receipt".  We understand that removing the check mark from this box is essentially telling the system that you do not want to perform a goods receipt for this purchase order.  When the invoice is received in R/3, the system will pay the invoice and not put it in a block status.  The business is asking for this ability at a line item level.  In essence they want to tell the system that a goods receipt is not required by line item.  Apparently this capability exists in a purchase requisition in R/3.  Does anyone know if this is possible in SRM?
    Best regards,
    Shawn O'Connor

    Hello Shawn,
    I don't understand your request, because document control in BBP_POC transaction ("Process Purchase Order") is done at item level...
    Could you clarify ?
    EDIT:
    Sorry, i did not see your are in SRM 4.0...
    In SRM 5.0, document control for follow-on document is done at item level.
    EDIT:
    Regards.
    Laurent.
    Edited by: Laurent Burtaire on Mar 14, 2008 3:54 PM

  • NB205 - very poor product and service, do not buy Toshiba!! Completely dead in 6 months

    I am posting this to warn as many people as possible to avoid buying Toshiba in the future.  Not only was the product faulty, which I can understand sometimes happens w mass production.  But the service was completely unacceptable, which was the deciding factor for me.
    1.  My new Netbook NB-205/BL started intermittently shutting down for no reason (complete black screen, not even to blue screen).  By the time I returned home from my trip it had stopped working altogether.  The power light will come on, and the fan/hard disk will try to spin for a split second and then go silent and stop completely.
    2.  Upon calling tech support who walked me through a bunch of diagnostic attempts (removing and re-inserting battery, etc.), they concluded it was dead and I needed to send it in.
    3.  The only thing I really care about is my data as I had stored a bunch of invaluable photos and downloaded about $200 worth of Amazon MP3s since receiving the Toshiba NB205.
    4.  Tech support assured me they would back up the hard drive for me and ship either a fixed or new computer with all my data still intact.  They asked me to register it w their warranty department and call them back so they could send me a shipping box to send it back in.  I did all that and it's been >3 weeks and no box.
    5.  So today I called Tech Support again and the guy goes "Oh yes, you have shipped your computer in for a hard drive failure?".  At which point I had to explain how A) it's not a hard drive failure B) I haven't shipped anything anywhere because I never got the box I was promised.
    6.  Then I proceed to ask him again if my data would be safe, to which he informs me it's Toshiba policy/practice not to back up data for customers.  I found this to be unacceptable and then I didn't know who to trust so I asked for a supervisor.
    7.  This supervisor wasn't able to help me either as he further informed me that they will not back anything up for me AND that I had to pay for shipping AND pay an authorized Toshiba Repair Center to back my hard drive up.
    8.  I suggested what everyone who I've talked to has said:  Toshiba could send me a new computer since they've diagnosed the old one as being dead.  I could swap out the hard drives, or they could send me one without a hard drive.  And I could send them back the dead NB205.
    9.  NO was the answer.  Toshiba wouldn't do anything for me, because software issues are NOT under warranty.  And backing up my hard drive is considered to be a software issue.  I repeatedly told him that it's their defective hardware that is causing the need for data backup.  But this went ignored and I was told they don't cover anything in this case.
    I either had to lose my data or pay probably $100 for a Toshiba dealer to back up my data for me.  Oh yeah, and there isn't one of those within 20 miles of me and I live in Silicon Valley!!  Oh yes, and they want me to pay to ship them the dead computer.
    10.  I finally asked him how he would feel if he was the customer, and if he felt this was any way to treat Toshiba customers.  He replied by saying they have a process, and this is the process!
    Well the next time I and any of you are in our "process" of deciding which brand of technology to buy, I'm certainly not going to consider Toshiba anymore.  This is the second chance I'm giving Toshiba after having a very poor laptop AND service experience in 2000.  Well, it took me 9 years to give them another shot, and I'm never going to trust them again.  I told myself "well, it's a high quality Japanese brand, one that commands a premium in price that people are willing to pay so it should be an excellent product.  AND if things do go pooryly, Toshiba will stand behind their name."
    I was SO wrong!!!  Let this be a message to all people out there, as I did read these forums before buying my product, but the NB205 was so new it didn't have many posts.
    Fool me once, shame on you.  Fool me twice, shame on me!  I'm done with you Toshiba, it's really too bad that you will not honor your brand with fair treatment of your customers.
    Ming Wu

    It isn't that difficult to back up the data from the hard drive.  You can easily do it yourself for about $20.  http://www.datarecoverytutorial.com/recover-data-from-failed-laptop-notebook/
    As for Toshiba backing up your data, ALL of the manufacturer's have that same policy.  NONE of them will backup the data for you nor will they guarantee that your system will be returned with the existing data intact.  This is spelled out in the Warranty documents and is fairly common knowledge amongst most computer users. 
    If the data was that important you should have been backing it up to USB flash drives, a usb external hard drive, or some other backup device on a daily basis just for this very reason.  The fact that you failed to do so doesn't make it Toshiba's problem.
    If you don't post your COMPLETE model number it's very difficult to assist you. Please try to post in complete sentences with punctuation, capitals, and correct spelling. Toshiba does NOT provide any direct support in these forums. All support is User to User in their spare time.

  • Apple maps has received a poor performance rating just after introduction of the iPhone 5. I am running google maps app on the phone. Siri cannot seem to get me to a specific address. Where does the problem lie? Thanks.

    Apple maps has received a poor performance rating just after introduction of the iPhone 5. I am running Google Maps app on the phone. SIRI cannot seem to get me to a specific address. Where does the problem lie? Also can anyone tell me the hierarchy of use between the Apple Maps, SIRI, and Google maps when the app is on the phone? How do you choose one over the other as the default map usage? Or better still how do you suppress SIRI from using the Apple maps app when requesting a "go to"?
    I have placed an address location into the CONTACTS list and when I ask SIRI to "take me there" it found a TOTALLY different location in the metro area with the same street name. I have included the address, the quadrant, (NE) and the ZIP code into the CONTACTS list. As it turns out, no amount of canceling the trip or relocating the address in the CONTACTS list line would prevent SIRI from taking me to this bogus location. FINALLY I typed in Northeast for NE in the CONTACTS list (NE being the accepted method of defining the USPS location quadrant) , canceled the current map route and it finally found the correct address. This problem would normally not demand such a response from me to have it fixed but the address is one of a hospital in the center of town and this hospital HAS a branch location in a similar part of town (NOT the original address SIRI was trying to take me to). This screw up could be dangerous if not catastrophic to someone who was looking for a hospital location fast and did not know of these two similar locations. After all the whole POINT of directions is not just whimsical pasttime or convenience. In a pinch people need to rely on this function. OR, are my expectations set too high? 
    How does the iPhone select between one app or the other (Apple Maps or Gppgle Maps) as it relates to SIRI finding and showing a map route?  
    Why does SIRI return an address that is NOT the correct address nor is the returned location in the requested ZIP code?
    Is there a known bug in the CONTACTS list that demands the USPS quadrant ID be spelled out, as opposed to abreviated, to permit SIRI to do its routing?
    Thanks for any clarification on these matters.

    siri will only use apple maps, this cannot be changed. you could try google voice in the google app.

  • General poor performance of my Mac mini

    I have been using my mac mini for over a year, it continues to frustrate me how slow and unresponsive it can be even though I do very little with it, i.e organise photos and browse the web - usually looking for solutions to the poor performance problem!
    I came a cross this app that has given me lots of information, unfortunately with my limited IT know-how there is nothing here that gives me any clues, as to the cause of the problem. I guess the red font is not good?
    I'm sorry i can't be more specific about the problem other than to say that iPhoto and Safari the two programmes i use way more often than any other, keep giving me the beach ball. My internet speed is ok 25 Mbps down - 4.5 Mbps
    Is there anything here that stands out as being wrong? if so any suggestions/ instructions for what I should do?
    p.s. i had to quit Safari while writing this and have a report for this if it helps?
    Any help much appreciated.
    Problem description:
    My mac is just generally very slow. I only use it to look at the internet and manage photos.
    EtreCheck version: 2.1.5 (108)
    Report generated 3 January 2015 16:03:59 GMT
    Click the [Support] links for help with non-Apple products.
    Click the [Details] links for more information about that line.
    Click the [Adware] links for help removing adware.
    Hardware Information: ℹ️
      Mac mini (Late 2012) (Verified)
      Mac mini - model: Macmini6,2
      1 2.3 GHz Intel Core i7 CPU: 4-core
      4 GB RAM Upgradeable
      BANK 0/DIMM0
      2 GB DDR3 1600 MHz ok
      BANK 1/DIMM0
      2 GB DDR3 1600 MHz ok
      Bluetooth: Good - Handoff/Airdrop2 supported
      Wireless:  en1: 802.11 a/b/g/n
    Video Information: ℹ️
      Intel HD Graphics 4000
      DELL U2412M 1920 x 1200
    System Software: ℹ️
      OS X 10.10.1 (14B25) - Uptime: 5 days 22:14:3
    Disk Information: ℹ️
      APPLE HDD HTS541010A9E662 disk0 : (1 TB)
      EFI (disk0s1) <not mounted> : 210 MB
      Macintosh HD (disk0s2) / : 999.35 GB (759.01 GB free)
      Recovery HD (disk0s3) <not mounted>  [Recovery]: 650 MB
    USB Information: ℹ️
      HP Photosmart B110 series
      Apple Inc. BRCM20702 Hub
      Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB Host Controller
      Apple, Inc. IR Receiver
    Thunderbolt Information: ℹ️
      Apple Inc. thunderbolt_bus
    Gatekeeper: ℹ️
      Mac App Store and identified developers
    Problem System Launch Daemons: ℹ️
      [killed] com.apple.AssetCacheLocatorService.plist
      [killed] com.apple.coreservices.appleid.passwordcheck.plist
      [killed] com.apple.ctkd.plist
      [killed] com.apple.wdhelper.plist
      [killed] com.apple.xpc.smd.plist
      5 processes killed due to memory pressure
    Launch Daemons: ℹ️
      [loaded] com.adobe.fpsaud.plist [Support]
    User Login Items: ℹ️
      iTunesHelper Application (/Applications/iTunes.app/Contents/MacOS/iTunesHelper.app)
      Dropbox Application (/Applications/Dropbox.app)
      Wondershare Helper Compact Application (/Users/[redacted]/Library/Application Support/Helper/Wondershare Helper Compact.app)
    Internet Plug-ins: ℹ️
      Silverlight: Version: 5.1.30514.0 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
      FlashPlayer-10.6: Version: 16.0.0.235 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
      Flash Player: Version: 16.0.0.235 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
      QuickTime Plugin: Version: 7.7.3
      Unity Web Player: Version: UnityPlayer version 4.5.5f1 - SDK 10.6 [Support]
      Default Browser: Version: 600 - SDK 10.10
    3rd Party Preference Panes: ℹ️
      Flash Player  [Support]
    Time Machine: ℹ️
      Auto backup: YES
      Volumes being backed up:
      Macintosh HD: Disk size: 999.35 GB Disk used: 240.33 GB
      Destinations:
      Time Capsule [Network]
      Total size: 2.00 TB
      Total number of backups: 56
      Oldest backup: 2014-09-30 04:29:13 +0000
      Last backup: 2015-01-03 15:37:35 +0000
      Size of backup disk: Adequate
      Backup size 2.00 TB > (Disk used 240.33 GB X 3)
    Top Processes by CPU: ℹ️
        110% com.apple.WebKit.Plugin.64
          6% WindowServer
          1% Activity Monitor
          1% coreaudiod
          1% sysmond
    Top Processes by Memory: ℹ️
      1.11 GB com.apple.WebKit.Plugin.64
      73 MB iTunes
      49 MB com.apple.WebKit.WebContent
      39 MB mds
      39 MB WindowServer
    Virtual Memory Information: ℹ️
      68 MB Free RAM
      1.07 GB Active RAM
      1.02 GB Inactive RAM
      893 MB Wired RAM
      63.93 GB Page-ins
      2.15 GB Page-outs
    Diagnostics Information: ℹ️
      Jan 1, 2015, 11:43:39 AM /Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/com.apple.WebKit.Plugin.64_2015-01-01-114339_[r edacted].cpu_resource.diag [Details]
      Jan 1, 2015, 11:32:46 AM /Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/WindowServer_2015-01-01-113246_[redacted].crash
      Jan 1, 2015, 11:00:30 AM /Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/com.apple.WebKit.Plugin.64_2015-01-01-110030_[r edacted].cpu_resource.diag [Details]
      Jan 1, 2015, 10:19:03 AM /Library/Logs/DiagnosticReports/iBooks_2015-01-01-101903_[redacted].cpu_resourc e.diag [Details]

    Hi Linc Davis
    Thank you for taking the time to respond.
    I got this information from a time when I was opening up iPhoto, and then going to the iCloud folder. To be honest it wasn't the most disastrous of events, I did get a few beachballs and when I opened up a shared folder the photos weren't loaded as normal. As I get more lengthy delays in carrying out any activities I will post back the console results.
    Just as a bit more info, I don't consider my problem an update to Yosemite problem, if anything since updating performance has been improved from Mavericks.
    Do you have any comments about upgrading RAM from the 4GB I have?
    Should I act on any of the messages in red from the EtreCheck report?
    Many Thanks
    Duncan
    03/01/2015 19:30:18.331 com.apple.iCloudHelper[12481]: objc[12481]: Class FALogging is implemented in both /System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/FamilyCircle.framework/Versions/A/FamilyCircl e and /System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/FamilyNotification.framework/Versions/A/Famil yNotification. One of the two will be used. Which one is undefined.
    03/01/2015 19:30:18.391 com.apple.xpc.launchd[1]: (com.apple.imfoundation.IMRemoteURLConnectionAgent) The _DirtyJetsamMemoryLimit key is not available on this platform.
    03/01/2015 19:30:19.162 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
    03/01/2015 19:30:19.162 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
    03/01/2015 19:30:19.163 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
    03/01/2015 19:30:19.163 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
    03/01/2015 19:30:19.186 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
    03/01/2015 19:30:19.187 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
    03/01/2015 19:30:19.188 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
    03/01/2015 19:30:19.188 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
    03/01/2015 19:30:19.188 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
    03/01/2015 19:30:19.188 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
    03/01/2015 19:30:25.446 WindowServer[7810]: common_reenable_update: UI updates were finally reenabled by application "iPhoto" after 10.70 seconds (server forcibly re-enabled them after 1.00 seconds)
    03/01/2015 19:30:33.548 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase MayBegin (128), but previous was 1 (not 0, Cancelled or End)
    03/01/2015 19:30:33.919 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Began (1), but previous was 1 (not 0, MayBegin or End)
    03/01/2015 19:30:34.077 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Ended (4), but previous was 4 (not Began)
    03/01/2015 19:30:34.605 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase MayBegin (128), but previous was 1 (not 0, Cancelled or End)
    03/01/2015 19:30:34.774 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Began (1), but previous was 1 (not 0, MayBegin or End)
    03/01/2015 19:30:34.853 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Ended (4), but previous was 4 (not Began)
    03/01/2015 19:30:47.562 pkd[12123]: FCIsAppAllowedToLaunchExt [343] -- *** _FCMIGAppCanLaunch timed out. Returning false.
    03/01/2015 19:31:10.695 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase MayBegin (128), but previous was 1 (not 0, Cancelled or End)
    03/01/2015 19:31:10.807 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Began (1), but previous was 1 (not 0, MayBegin or End)
    03/01/2015 19:31:16.961 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Ended (4), but previous was 4 (not Began)
    03/01/2015 19:31:18.514 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase MayBegin (128), but previous was 1 (not 0, Cancelled or End)
    03/01/2015 19:31:18.593 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Began (1), but previous was 1 (not 0, MayBegin or End)
    03/01/2015 19:31:22.538 discoveryd[49]: Basic Sockets SetDelegatePID() failed for PID[3491] errno[3] result[-1]
    03/01/2015 19:31:27.912 mds[32]: (DiskStore.Normal:2376) 6052001 1.780097
    03/01/2015 19:31:56.831 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Ended (4), but previous was 4 (not Began)
    03/01/2015 19:31:57.224 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase MayBegin (128), but previous was 1 (not 0, Cancelled or End)
    03/01/2015 19:31:57.281 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Began (1), but previous was 1 (not 0, MayBegin or End)
    03/01/2015 19:31:57.405 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Ended (4), but previous was 4 (not Began)
    03/01/2015 19:31:58.507 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase MayBegin (128), but previous was 1 (not 0, Cancelled or End)
    03/01/2015 19:31:58.541 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Began (1), but previous was 1 (not 0, MayBegin or End)
    03/01/2015 19:31:59.160 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Ended (4), but previous was 4 (not Began)
    03/01/2015 19:32:09.891 com.apple.InputMethodKit.UserDictionary[12456]: -[PFUbiquitySetupAssistant canReadFromUbiquityRootLocation:](1492): CoreData: Ubiquity:  Error attempting to read ubiquity root url: file:///Users/Duncan/Library/Mobile%20Documents/com~apple~TextInput/Dictionarie s/.
    Error: Error Domain=NSCocoaErrorDomain Code=134323 "The operation couldn’t be completed. (Cocoa error 134323.)" UserInfo=0x7f90e152a380 {NSAffectedObjectsErrorKey=<PFUbiquityLocation: 0x7f90e152a2e0>: /Users/Duncan/Library/Mobile Documents/com~apple~TextInput}
    userInfo: {
        NSAffectedObjectsErrorKey = "<PFUbiquityLocation: 0x7f90e152a2e0>: /Users/Duncan/Library/Mobile Documents/com~apple~TextInput";
    03/01/2015 19:32:12.862 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Began (1), but previous was 1 (not 0, MayBegin or End)
    03/01/2015 19:32:20.818 com.apple.SecurityServer[53]: Killing auth hosts
    03/01/2015 19:32:20.819 com.apple.SecurityServer[53]: Session 100281 destroyed
    03/01/2015 19:32:20.974 com.apple.SecurityServer[53]: Session 100577 created
    03/01/2015 19:32:34.833 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Ended (4), but previous was 4 (not Began)
    03/01/2015 19:32:35.767 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase MayBegin (128), but previous was 1 (not 0, Cancelled or End)
    03/01/2015 19:32:35.789 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Began (1), but previous was 1 (not 0, MayBegin or End)
    03/01/2015 19:32:35.980 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Ended (4), but previous was 4 (not Began)
    03/01/2015 19:32:36.273 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Began (1), but previous was 1 (not 0, MayBegin or End)
    03/01/2015 19:32:36.487 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Ended (4), but previous was 4 (not Began)
    03/01/2015 19:32:47.035 WindowServer[7810]: disable_update_timeout: UI updates were forcibly disabled by application "iPhoto" for over 1.00 seconds. Server has re-enabled them.
    03/01/2015 19:32:50.555 WindowServer[7810]: common_reenable_update: UI updates were finally reenabled by application "iPhoto" after 4.52 seconds (server forcibly re-enabled them after 1.00 seconds)
    03/01/2015 19:32:51.578 WindowServer[7810]: disable_update_timeout: UI updates were forcibly disabled by application "iPhoto" for over 1.00 seconds. Server has re-enabled them.
    03/01/2015 19:32:52.745 WindowServer[7810]: common_reenable_update: UI updates were finally reenabled by application "iPhoto" after 2.17 seconds (server forcibly re-enabled them after 1.00 seconds)
    03/01/2015 19:32:53.098 mds[32]: (DiskStore.Normal:2376) 6052001 1.279589
    03/01/2015 19:33:03.332 BezelServices 245.23[7816]: ASSERTION FAILED: dvcAddrRef != ((void *)0) -[DriverServices getDeviceAddress:] line: 2602
    03/01/2015 19:33:03.332 BezelServices 245.23[7816]: ASSERTION FAILED: dvcAddrRef != ((void *)0) -[DriverServices getDeviceAddress:] line: 2602
    03/01/2015 19:33:11.961 mds[32]: (DiskStore.Normal:2376) 6052001 1.939804
    03/01/2015 19:33:29.541 WindowServer[7810]: disable_update_timeout: UI updates were forcibly disabled by application "iPhoto" for over 1.00 seconds. Server has re-enabled them.
    03/01/2015 19:33:32.354 WindowServer[7810]: common_reenable_update: UI updates were finally reenabled by application "iPhoto" after 3.81 seconds (server forcibly re-enabled them after 1.00 seconds)
    03/01/2015 19:33:44.549 discoveryd[49]: Basic DNSResolver  dropping message because it doesn't match the one sent Port:53 MsgID:20602
    03/01/2015 19:33:54.055 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase MayBegin (128), but previous was 1 (not 0, Cancelled or End)
    03/01/2015 19:34:05.143 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
    03/01/2015 19:34:05.143 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
    03/01/2015 19:34:05.165 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
    03/01/2015 19:34:05.165 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
    03/01/2015 19:34:05.165 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
    03/01/2015 19:34:05.166 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
    03/01/2015 19:34:05.166 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
    03/01/2015 19:34:05.166 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
    03/01/2015 19:34:05.166 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
    03/01/2015 19:34:05.166 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
    03/01/2015 19:34:05.166 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
    03/01/2015 19:34:05.166 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
    03/01/2015 19:34:05.166 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
    03/01/2015 19:34:05.166 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
    03/01/2015 19:34:05.166 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
    03/01/2015 19:34:05.166 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
    03/01/2015 19:34:05.499 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: called
    03/01/2015 19:34:05.499 discoveryd[49]: WCFNameResolvesToAddr: entering
    03/01/2015 19:34:07.001 discoveryd[49]: Basic Sockets SetDelegatePID() failed for PID[3491] errno[3] result[-1]
    03/01/2015 19:34:13.809 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase MayBegin (128), but previous was 1 (not 0, Cancelled or End)
    03/01/2015 19:34:13.821 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Began (1), but previous was 1 (not 0, MayBegin or End)
    03/01/2015 19:34:14.124 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Ended (4), but previous was 4 (not Began)
    03/01/2015 19:34:14.766 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase MayBegin (128), but previous was 1 (not 0, Cancelled or End)
    03/01/2015 19:34:14.867 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Began (1), but previous was 1 (not 0, MayBegin or End)
    03/01/2015 19:34:17.769 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Ended (4), but previous was 4 (not Began)
    03/01/2015 19:34:18.186 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase MayBegin (128), but previous was 1 (not 0, Cancelled or End)
    03/01/2015 19:34:18.186 WindowServer[7810]: scrollPhase Began (1), but previous was 1 (not 0, MayBegin or End)

  • Poor performance of the BDB cache

    I'm experiencing incredibly poor performance of the BDB cache and wanted to share my experience, in case anybody has any suggestions.
    Overview
    Stone Steps maintains a fork of a web log analysis tool - the Webalizer (http://www.stonesteps.ca/projects/webalizer/). One of the problems with the Webalizer is that it maintains all data (i.e. URLs, search strings, IP addresses, etc) in memory, which puts a cap on the maximum size of the data set that can be analyzed. Naturally, BDB was picked as the fastest database to maintain analyzed data on disk set and produce reports by querying the database. Unfortunately, once the database grows beyond the cache size, overall performance goes down the drain.
    Note that the version of SSW available for download does not support BDB in the way described below. I can make the source available for you, however, if you find your own large log files to analyze.
    The Database
    Stone Steps Webalizer (SSW) is a command-line utility and needs to preserve all intermediate data for the month on disk. The original approach was to use a plain-text file (webalizer.current, for those who know anything about SSW). The BDB database that replaced this plain text file consists of the following databases:
    sequences (maintains record IDs for all other tables)
    urls -primary database containing URL data - record ID (key), URL itself, grouped data, such as number of hits, transfer size, etc)
    urls.values - secondary database that contains a hash of the URL (key) and the record ID linking it to the primary database; this database is used for value lookups)
    urls.hits - secondary database that contains the number of hits for each URL (key) and the record ID to link it to the primary database; this database is used to order URLs in the report by the number of hits.
    The remaining databases are here just to indicate the database structure. They are the same in nature as the two described above. The legend is as follows: (s) will indicate a secondary database, (p) - primary database, (sf) - filtered secondary database (using DB_DONOTINDEX).
    urls.xfer (s), urls.entry (s), urls.exit (s), urls.groups.hits (sf), urls.groups.xfer (sf)
    hosts (p), hosts.values (s), hosts.hits (s), hosts.xfer (s), hosts.groups.hits (sf), hosts.groups.xfer (sf)
    downloads (p), downloads.values (s), downloads.xfer (s)
    agents (p), agents.values (s), agents.values (s), agents.hits (s), agents.visits (s), agents.groups.visits (sf)
    referrers (p), referrers.values (s), referrers.values (s), referrers.hits (s), referrers.groups.hits (sf)
    search (p), search.values (s), search.hits (s)
    users (p), users.values (s), users.hits (s), users.groups.hits (sf)
    errors (p), errors.values (s), errors.hits (s)
    dhosts (p), dhosts.values (s)
    statuscodes (HTTP status codes)
    totals.daily (31 days)
    totals.hourly (24 hours)
    totals (one record)
    countries (a couple of hundred countries)
    system (one record)
    visits.active (active visits - variable length)
    downloads.active (active downloads - variable length)
    All these databases (49 of them) are maintained in a single file. Maintaining a single database file is a requirement, so that the entire database for the month can be renamed, backed up and used to produce reports on demand.
    Database Size
    One of the sample Squid logs I received from a user contains 4.4M records and is about 800MB in size. The resulting database is 625MB in size. Note that there is no duplication of text data - only nodes and such values as hits and transfer sizes are duplicated. Each record also contains some small overhead (record version for upgrades, etc).
    Here are the sizes of the URL databases (other URL secondary databases are similar to urls.hits described below):
    urls (p):
    8192 Underlying database page size
    2031 Overflow key/data size
    1471636 Number of unique keys in the tree
    1471636 Number of data items in the tree
    193 Number of tree internal pages
    577738 Number of bytes free in tree internal pages (63% ff)
    55312 Number of tree leaf pages
    145M Number of bytes free in tree leaf pages (67% ff)
    2620 Number of tree overflow pages
    16M Number of bytes free in tree overflow pages (25% ff)
    urls.hits (s)
    8192 Underlying database page size
    2031 Overflow key/data size
    2 Number of levels in the tree
    823 Number of unique keys in the tree
    1471636 Number of data items in the tree
    31 Number of tree internal pages
    201970 Number of bytes free in tree internal pages (20% ff)
    45 Number of tree leaf pages
    243550 Number of bytes free in tree leaf pages (33% ff)
    2814 Number of tree duplicate pages
    8360024 Number of bytes free in tree duplicate pages (63% ff)
    0 Number of tree overflow pages
    The Testbed
    I'm running all these tests using the latest BDB (v4.6) built from the source on Win2K3 server (release version). The test machine is 1.7GHz P4 with 1GB of RAM and an IDE hard drive. Not the fastest machine, but it was able to handle a log file like described before at a speed of 20K records/sec.
    BDB is configured in a single file in a BDB environment, using private memory, since only one process ever has access to the database).
    I ran a performance monitor while running SSW, capturing private bytes, disk read/write I/O, system cache size, etc.
    I also used a code profiler to analyze SSW and BDB performance.
    The Problem
    Small log files, such as 100MB, can be processed in no time - BDB handles them really well. However, once the entire BDB cache is filled up, the machine goes into some weird state and can sit in this state for hours and hours before completing the analysis.
    Another problem is that traversing large primary or secondary databases is a really slow and painful process. It is really not that much data!
    Overall, the 20K rec/sec quoted above drop down to 2K rec/sec. And that's all after most of the analysis has been done, just trying to save the database.
    The Tests
    SSW runs in two modes, memory mode and database mode. In memory mode, all data is kept in memory in SSW's own hash tables and then saved to BDB at the end of each run.
    In memory mode, the entire BDB is dumped to disk at the end of the run. First, it runs fairly fast, until the BDB cache is filled up. Then writing (disk I/O) goes at a snail pace, at about 3.5MB/sec, even though this disk can write at about 12-15MB/sec.
    Another problem is that the OS cache gets filled up, chewing through all available memory long before completion. In order to deal with this problem, I disabled the system cache using the DB_DIRECT_DB/LOG options. I could see OS cache left alone, but once BDB cache was filed up, processing speed was as good as stopped.
    Then I flipped options and used DB_DSYNC_DB/LOG options to disable OS disk buffering. This improved overall performance and even though OS cache was filling up, it was being flushed as well and, eventually, SSW finished processing this log, sporting 2K rec/sec. At least it finished, though - other combinations of these options lead to never-ending tests.
    In the database mode, stale data is put into BDB after processing every N records (e.g. 300K rec). In this mode, BDB behaves similarly - until the cache is filled up, the performance is somewhat decent, but then the story repeats.
    Some of the other things I tried/observed:
    * I tried to experiment with the trickle option. In all honesty, I hoped that this would be the solution to my problems - trickle some, make sure it's on disk and then continue. Well, trickling was pretty much useless and didn't make any positive impact.
    * I disabled threading support, which gave me some performance boost during regular value lookups throughout the test run, but it didn't help either.
    * I experimented with page size, ranging them from the default 8K to 64K. Using large pages helped a bit, but as soon as the BDB cached filled up, the story repeated.
    * The Db.put method, which was called 73557 times while profiling saving the database at the end, took 281 seconds. Interestingly enough, this method called ReadFile function (Win32) 20000 times, which took 258 seconds. The majority of the Db.put time was wasted on looking up records that were being updated! These lookups seem to be the true problem here.
    * I tried libHoard - it usually provides better performance, even in a single-threaded process, but libHoard didn't help much in this case.

    I have been able to improve processing speed up to
    6-8 times with these two techniques:
    1. A separate trickle thread was created that would
    periodically call DbEnv::memp_trickle. This works
    especially good on multicore machines, but also
    speeds things up a bit on single CPU boxes. This
    alone improved speed from 2K rec/sec to about 4K
    rec/sec.Hello Stone,
    I am facing a similar problem, and I too hope to resolve the same with memp_trickle. I had these queries.
    1. what was the % of clean pages that you specified?
    2. What duration were you clling this thread to call memp_trickle?
    This would give me a rough idea about which to tune my app. Would really appreciate if you can answer these queries.
    Regards,
    Nishith.
    >
    2. Maintaining multiple secondary databases in real
    time proved to be the bottleneck. The code was
    changed to create secondary databases at the end of
    the run (calling Db::associate with the DB_CREATE
    flag), right before the reports are generated, which
    use these secondary databases. This improved speed
    from 4K rec/sec to 14K rec/sec.

Maybe you are looking for

  • TV does not work anymore on Qosmio G10

    Good morning, TV does not work anymore, may be due to an update. It has been working OK before. When selecting TV option 'TV direct ' with MCE menu, I get the following error message: "necessary files for video display are not installed or do not wor

  • Purchase order wise budget

    Dear Sapgurus, My client requirement is Budget Value we enter in system. Like total purchases 1,00,000 In this one Logistics people raise one purchase odrer while raising of p.o logistics persons decided some commitment item value. Commitment Value 2

  • Are there limits to devices connected to the Jetpack?

    I'm using the Jetpack and it's working fine, except that I can not get my second eReader to connect even with the correct password.  Is there a limit to the number of devices connected to the Jetpack; and, if not, how does one allow additional device

  • REG COLUMN

    Hi, Is there a way that we count the number of columns present in a table. Count(*) - provided the number of rows in a table. How too count the number of columns for a table. Any advices please Cheers Kumar

  • Using Native Inspector Very Frequently Breaks CSS on Various Pages Completely Arbitrarily.

    Hello, I'm running Firefox 19 on Mac OSX 10.8.2 and I do web development sometimes. Lately, I became a big fan of the native inspector inside Firefox and I began using it often. At least 100 times a day. I found that using it this often breaks CSS on