NAT and Routed Network with Two ISP's on one router

I'm sure this has been done covered many times, but I am not finding it.
I have two ISP connections.
With ISP-A I have a /30 between us and 200.100.100.0/24 is routed to me via the /30 for thsi example we will say the /30 is 1.1.1.1 on isp end and 1.1.1.2 on my end
With ISP-B I have a 100.0.0.0/29 subnet. and the ISP gateway is on that subnet at 100.0.0.1
On the inside of my network I have devices using both 200.100.100.x addresses and devices on 192.168.100.x that need to use NAT.
I would like all of the devices on 200.100.100.x addresses to continue using ISP-A as their gateway.
Everything on 192.168.100.x should use NAT and go out ISP-B
I have tried
ip nat inside source route-map ISP-A interface GigabitEthernet0/1 overload
route-map ISP-B permit 10
match ip address 101
match interface GigabitEthernet0/1
set ip next-hop 100.0.0.1
route-map ISP-A permit 10
match ip address 111
match interface Multilink1
set ip next-hop 1.1.1.1
The problem comes when I have default routes to ISP-A in the router than none of the ISP-B traffic works, and vice versa.

I think for this to work correctly and be able to split traffic between the 2 ISPs, you would need to use BGP, because default is going to use one ISP or the other.
If you can use BGP, this link will help you in load shearing between multiple ISPs when you have one router.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/13762-40.html#conf4
HTH

Similar Messages

Home networking with two different Operational Systems

I have Internet Fios and am using now two computers wirelessly. One is PC and the other one is Mac. If I create a network would it stop me from losing my connection? If so, how to? At Verizon website, under network, the solutions refer only to Windows OS. I appreciate any help,
Sergio

What are you trying to accomplish. When you connect your computer to the router whether its wired or wireless you are on a network. What do you mean "create a network".
I have all sorts of devices on my network (PCs, smart phones, TVs, Blue Ray Players, Apple Devices etc.) and all access the internet or other devices on my network without issue.
Jim

I was setting up my Airport and thought the first set up did not go through, so I set up again and I ended up with two accounts instead of one. How can I manage to have only one account now? Thanks for the help.

I was setting up my Airport and thought the first set up dod not go through, then I set up again and ended up with two wireless accounts. I use it for the prointer and the iPad, and I can see both accounts in the iPad. How do I get rid of one account? Thanks for the help!

me.com accounts can be used for iCloud. See the FAQ section in:
<http://support.apple.com/kb/ht4895>
but it may be too late if you have already created a new AppleID.
A few years ago Apple said they were working on allowing account merging, but it never happened (maybe objections from copyright holders).

I just purchased an ibook for my mac for the first time and it started with two pages then switched to one with notes and i can't change it back. Anyone else having this problem?

I just purchased an ibook for my mac for the first time and it started with two pages then switched to one with notes and i can't change it back. Anyone else having this problem?

Up the top where the three buttons are (red yellow green) are three images. Click on the third image that looks like a notepad (not the first which is a library book), and that should get rid of 'Notes'. To read using two pages make the window bigger.

I have signed in iCloud and Apple Id with two different accounts and forgot the password of iCloud's account so what should I do?

I have signed in iCloud and Apple Id with two different accounts on my Iphone 4S and forgot the password of iCloud's account and I am unable to reset the password of it,so what should I do?

iCloud: Change your iCloud password
If you forgot your Apple ID password - Apple Support
Apple ID: Contacting Apple for help with Apple ID account security - Apple Support
A forgotten iCloud password as above can go to http://iforgot.apple.com and sign in with the same ID they use for iCloud to enter the password reset process.
https://getsupport.apple.com/https://getsupport.apple.com/GetproductgroupList.action

HT1476 i plug in my phone to the charger and i tried with two different cables, and it seems like it is not making connection to the clable?

i plug in my phone to the charger and i tried with two different cables, and it seems like it is not making connection to the clable. but it is not charging. what are some possible ways o fix that?

When you plug in your charger and attach it to the MBP, initially the light will turn green. If the MBP needs charging, a few seconds later the light will turn amber. That is normal. If your symptoms are different, then they may or may not be a problem.
Ciao.

Generally when creating a Word file from either a Mac or Win7 pc and opening it on two different machines (either one first) it always prompts that the file is open and will be opened as read only. However opening a CSS file does not prompt that it is alr

Generally when creating a Word file from either a Mac or Win7 pc and opening it on two different machines (either one first) it always prompts that the file is open and will be opened as read only.
However opening a CSS file does not prompt that it is already open on or from any machine which is causing code edits to be lost.
What we found from out testing:
- The file can be saved from one user to the server and WILL NOT PROMPT on other machines until the saving machine has the Dreamweaver program closed completely
- The file can be closed and Dreamweaver minimised to the launch bar but it still will not register on other machines that it has been changed.
- Also, until the Dreamweaver program is closed on the machines, it will continue to open it's saved version of the file.
Example Scenario:
- User 1 opens test.css (which is 2000 lines) and adds some code to the end of the file to bring it up to 2500 lines
- Meanwhile User 2 opens test.css as well (opens as 2000 lines as User 1’s edits have not yet been saved) and adds in code to bring it to 2300 lines
- User 1 saves his file and closes it - but Dreamweaver is still open.
- User 2 also saves his file and leaves Dreamweaver open.
- The server will report the size and last edit of the file the same as User 2 as he was the last person to save it (and if you open from the Win7 Machine it will show as User 2’s 2300 line version)
- If User 1 then open's the file again (from either the 'recent' in Dreamweaver OR clicking on the file directly in Finder...which version opens.... The version that User 1 saved! Not the true version on the server, but the version that User 1 edited and saved with 2500 lines in it.
- Same for User 2, he will open 'his' version with 2300 lines in.
Other information:
- Files are opened directly from the server
- Sometimes the users will save incrementally and re-open
- Most of the time users will save incrementally and keep the files open
- The users will never not save incrementally and just save when closing the file once finished
- The users are usually working on the files all day
- It is always the bottom lines of code that are lost. It could be a case of the two versions being mixed up and cutting off the newly added lines based on the line count (possibly).
It is as if Dreamweaver is holding a cache of the version locally and then only properly looking back to the server when it has been completely closed. It is very difficult to see how the server is causing such an impact on these files, there are very few logs which are giving any indication to the root cause of the problems.
Anyone know if this is a known issue?
Is there a way that there can be a featured implemented on the server that doesn't allow another user to open a file if it is already open on another machine?
Thanks

Your server file handling has nothing, and really nothing to do with Adobe software. If files don't get locked for (over-)writing and/or lose connection to the program opening them, then your server is misconfigured. It's as plain and simple and that. Anything from "known file types"/ file associations not being set correctly, MIME types being botched, crooked user privileges and file permissions, missing Mac server extensions, delayed file writing on the server, generic network timeout issues and what have you. Either way, you have written a longwinded post with no real value since you haven't bothered to provide any proper technical info, most notably about the alleged server. Either way, the only way you can "fix" it is by straightening out your server and network configuration, not some magic switch in Adobe's software.
Mylenium

Is possible to take the Infopath form with two repeat section in one SharePoint list

Is possible to take the Infopath form with two repeat section in one Sharepoint list
Take two repeat section and put them one bellow to other one in a SP list.
The motive is that the first repeat section is based in account own by the requestor and the second repeat section is when the requestor is doing backup time for some one else where need to log the amount of time that spend in the peer account.
I have basic logic in the form when requestor said Are you doing backup for some else? and press YES it is be able to use the second repeat section.
Le me know how much pain full is going tobe or not..
–Q1: Is possible to do this ? With codeless or not
–Q2:What steps I need to do to accomplish this? feasible or not
the following picture give a better idea of what I am looking to accomplish:
CRISTINA&amp MICROSOFT Forum

Hi,
Thank you for your question. I am trying to involve someone familiar with this topic to further look at this issue. There might be some time delay. Appreciate your patience. Thank you for your understanding and support.
Thanks,
Linda Li
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Linda Li
TechNet Community Support

Mac Pro with two graphic card each one with two dvi output, can I extend deskop to three outputs?

Mac Pro with two graphic card each one with two dvi output, can I extend deskop to three outputs?

MAC OS 10.7.4 3.2GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon processors, 12GB of 800MHz DDR2 and 2 ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT 256MB (two dual-link DVI ports) . The problem is, I woul like to use one output as main and the three others as secondary or extended desktop but the system don't allow me use two diferent video cards this way.

How can my wife and I use our two iTunes account on one iPad

How can my wife and I use our two iTunes accounts on one IPad

Unfortunately it will be difficult. iPads are personal devices like phones and done have credentials. You can of course log out of and into the app store to download purchased apps but the iPad will then have all the apps of both your wife and you (though you could put these into folders I guess).
/H

I have problem with a dynamic failover with two isps

Hello, I would like to help me with something.
I would like to do failover on my cisco router but the problem is that i have two isp but one of them is DSL. I meam that It learns gateway for dhcp and this is my main gateway.
I tried to do the same thing but I can´t put track in this command "ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 dhcp.."
I also use "ip dhcp-client default-route 25" but It didn´t work..
could you help me ? please
I upload a file with configuration that i actually have it. In this file I don´t have any configuration about failover because i tried many option but i haven´t found any solution

I did this but on router didn´t change deafult route.
This is the configuration that i tried:
Current configuration : 9940 bytes
! Last configuration change at 22:10:41 UTC Fri Aug 29 2014 by Conssa
version 15.3
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
hostname RT_Conssaccs
boot-start-marker
boot system flash:c890-universalk9-mz.153-3.M2.bin
boot-end-marker
aqm-register-fnf
logging buffered 51200 warnings
enable secret 5 $1$RK//$OFh6Dnk96LlX1VFKQwsme.
aaa new-model
aaa authentication login default enable
aaa authentication login consola local
aaa authentication login vty line
aaa authentication login userauthen local
aaa authorization network EZAUTHR local
aaa session-id common
crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-4275920401
enrollment selfsigned
subject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-4275920401
revocation-check none
rsakeypair TP-self-signed-4275920401
ip dhcp ping timeout 100
ip dhcp update dns
ip dhcp-client default-router distance 100
ip cef
no ipv6 cef
multilink bundle-name authenticated
license udi pid CISCO891-K9 sn FTX145104B5
object-group network conssaremoto
description vpnremoto
range
object-group network pruebasael
description vpnremoto
range
redundancy
track 1 ip sla 1 reachability
no ip ftp passive
crypto isakmp policy 10
encr 3des
authentication pre-share
group 5
lifetime 180
crypto isakmp policy 20
encr 3des
hash md5
authentication pre-share
group 2
lifetime 28800
crypto isakmp key cisco address
crypto isakmp keepalive 10 4
crypto isakmp client configuration group conssa
key vpnbna
pool conssaVPN
acl 121
mode transport
crypto ipsec transform-set TSET esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
mode tunnel
crypto ipsec profile CiscoCP_Profile1
set transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA
set pfs group5
crypto ipsec profile EZPROFILE
set transform-set TSET
interface Tunnel0
description VPNConssaCCs
bandwidth 1000
ip address
ip mask-reply
ip mtu
ip nhrp authentication DMVPN_NW
ip nhrp map multicast
ip nhrp map
ip nhrp network-id 100000
ip nhrp holdtime 360
ip nhrp nhs
ip nhrp registration no-unique
ip nhrp registration timeout 30
ip tcp adjust-mss 1360
delay 1000
tunnel source GigabitEthernet0
tunnel destination
tunnel key 100000
tunnel protection ipsec profile CiscoCP_Profile1
interface FastEthernet0
no ip address
interface FastEthernet1
no ip address
interface FastEthernet2
switchport access vlan 2
no ip address
shutdown
interface FastEthernet3
no ip address
interface FastEthernet4
no ip address
interface FastEthernet5
no ip address
interface FastEthernet6
no ip address
interface FastEthernet7
no ip address
interface FastEthernet8
description $ETH-WAN$
no ip address
shutdown
duplex auto
speed auto
interface Virtual-Template1 type tunnel
ip unnumbered Vlan1
tunnel mode ipsec ipv4
tunnel protection ipsec profile EZPROFILE
interface GigabitEthernet0
description $ETH-WAN$
ip dhcp client route track 1
ip ddns update hostname
ip ddns update noip
ip address dhcp
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly in
duplex auto
speed auto
interface Vlan1
description $ETH-LAN$
ip address
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly in
ip tcp adjust-mss 1452
interface Vlan2
no ip address
shutdown
interface Async1
no ip address
encapsulation slip
ip local policy route-map prueba
ip forward-protocol nd
ip http server
ip http authentication local
ip http secure-server
ip http client username conssa
ip nat inside source list 1 interface GigabitEthernet0 overload
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.10.6.1 200
ip sla auto discovery
ip sla 1
icmp-echo 8.8.8.8 source-interface GigabitEthernet0
frequency 5
ip sla schedule 1 life forever start-time now
no logging trap
no cdp run
route-map prueba permit 10
match ip address 101
set ip next-hop dynamic dhcp
access-list 1 permit any
access-list 101 permit icmp any host 8.8.8.8 echo
sh ip route
Gateway of last resort is 200.84.32.1 to network 0.0.0.0
S* 0.0.0.0/0 [100/0] via 200.84.32.1
10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 3 subnets, 3 masks

Is this type of set-up possible - private and public network with Airport

We have an office network with Airport. We have internet with a cable modem with routers plugged to it. The network is not now shared with anyone outside the business.
But would it be possible to add a public component to our setup that would give others access to the internet but never, never, never allow them to enter/see/ mess with the private side?
Tim

Sorry to intrude, I came across this thread while I was looking for some other information and thought that there needed to be a point of clearification to identify some major security vulnerabilities.
With the current config, Cable Modem->Wan port of Router A->Router B plugged into LAN port on Router A
1. Traffic from Router A would see all traffic sent from router B out to the internet, if I was able to sniff the traffic on router A then I would see everything that router B was passing to the internet...not good idea if Router A is public, (traffic would not be encrypted since this is a hard line pass to the cable modem).
2. Router A will always be able to see the interface of router B (have to have it this way to perform the passing of IP traffic from one router to the other.) This means that router B will be open for brute force login attempts and any other vulnerabilities that the router might carry, again since this is being accessed from a publicly accessible network it would be hard to stop from happening in todays world.
3. Router B subnet - If you NAT all the IP's behind router A on it's on subnet (which would include Router B). Uunless router B truly has two interfaces (internal and external) you would not be able to use different subnets and expect to pass traffic all the way to the cable modem because it would not know how to get there.
Again, this post is not meant to cause annomosity, it is to help educate.
I personally think that the safer bet is to get a second hi-speed connection, physical seperation in this case is the best way to go, saves you the worry of getting attacked or snooped on, and keeps your private information safe from the public...unless that is something that you are willing to risk sharing.

Can I set up a WDS network with two main base stations?

I have an AEBS in the main part of the house and a time capsule in the office in the back of the house, currently with one internet connection (it's cable modem) into to the AEBS. I have tried to use relays (two airport expresses) in a WDS to have the internet connection reach the time capsule, but unfortunately the distance is too great and it won't make it.
I can move the internet connection and AEBS into the middle of the house and everything would be fine (one internet connection into the house, no need for relays to reach the time capsule), but this requires rewiring the cable connection and adding a power outlet, which seems like a lot of work.
My other option is to simply have another internet connection hardwired into the office. This would be using the same cable that comes into the house and is split outside. If I go this route--my question is--can I get the time capsule and the AEBS be on the same WDS network (same name, same passwords?), or will I have two separate networks in the house? If it is the former--how do I set it up? Can I have a WDS with two main base stations? Or is there an easier route?
Thanks the help and advice...

My other option is to simply have another internet connection hardwired into the office. This would be using the same cable that comes into the house and is split outside. If I go this route--my question is--can I get the time capsule and the AEBS be on the same WDS network (same name, same passwords?), or will I have two separate networks in the house? If it is the former--how do I set it up? Can I have a WDS with two main base stations? Or is there an easier route?
Just run the Ethernet cable from one of the LAN ports on the AEBS to the WAN port on the Time Capsule. Configure the Time Capsule to operate as a bridge.
You do not use WDS when they are wired together.
Then configure the AEBS and Time Capsule to use the same SSID, wireless encryption type/level/password. Have them operate on different channels as far apart as possible.

Double-Extended Network with two AX - Possible?

I am in a large apartment with lots of concrete walls. I use a Time Capsule (500G) connected to a cable modem to access the internet, and have two AX set up to extend the network twice. No. 1 is in a hall way and serves to extend the network into the living room. No. 2 is in the living room and serves as my iTunes connection to my stereo. I can stream wirelessly through No. 2 to the stereo, but my Internet connection (and presumably my streaming music) are routed through No. 1, even though I am sitting in front of No. 2.
Both AX are set on "Extend a wireless network" mode, and the network is on 5Ghz.
I have played with various settings on both AX, but cannot get my MBPro to connect to No. 2. Any thoughts? Can it be that two AX can not extend a network twice, serially?
Ed

Unless you have some unusual obstructions in place, your MBP should normally connect to the Express that it is closest to. Check your "extend" setup carefully as it is easy to make a mistake or forget a check mark on a configuration that can make all the difference.
In AirPort Utility > Manual Setup > Wireless tab, your TC must be setup to "create a wireless network" and there must be a check mark next to "Allow this network to be extended"
For the Express devices select the unit you want to check and use the same Manual Setup > Wireless tab to check the configuration of both units. Wireless mode should be "Extend a wireless network" and there must be a check mark next to "Allow wireless clients". AirTunes is active by default in the setup.
Check pages 43-44 on the AirPort Networks Guide...link is on the home page of the forum....for a step by step guide on setting up the "extend" feature.
Using your MBP, hold down the option key while you click the AirPort icon at the top of the screen and it will show you the MAC address of the device that you are connected to.
The important number in terms of bandwidth is Transmit Rate. You want it as high as possible. Experiment with a few different Radio Mode settings to determine what will give you the best Transmit Rate. It's possible that a 2.4 GHz setting may be better than a 5 GHz setting. It just depends on the construction of the home and number of obstructions in the signal path.

Using the OSPF default-information originate command with two ISPs

I am working for a company that has two Internet circuits with different ISPs at two different locations for redundancy, and both Internet circuits run at different speeds. I'd like to be able to direct the majority (but not all) of the traffic through the ISP with the larger bandwith, but then failover all traffic to one ISP when the other goes down. We're currently using the "default-information originate" command, which fails over OK, but I haven't figured out how to do the load balancing. I'd appreciate your thoughts. Thank you.

One thing that you could consider is advertising the default route as and
external 1 route instead of an external 2 route(cisco default). If you advertise it as an E1
route, all routers will take into consideration the cost associated with the
default route to the router advertising the default route plus the cost of the
default route itself. Whereas if it is an E2 route, the routers just use the
cost associated with the external cost and not the path to get to the router
advertising the default route.
If you made the default route E1, then the routers closest to the advertised
routers will prefer the closest default route and their preference could then be
tweaked by adjusting the interface costs for the default route with a routemap.
By using this method, you could then control which routers use which internet
connection on a per router basis because you could control the cost the internal router
sees for the path from the internal router to the ASBR advertising the default route. The
path with the lowest cost will be prefered.
router ospf 1
default-information originate metric-type 1

NAT and Routed Network with Two ISP's on one router

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for