Net Invoice Value

Hi
Net Invoice value is populating as ZERO, even after condition record is found, what could be the reason ?
Please share your ideas to fix the problem.
Thanks..

Hi,
The net value (VBRK-NETWR) is the sum of the net value item fields (VBRP-NETWR) in the billing document.
Although condition record has been found, you might want to check further in your condition if your item have a statistical value. You can check further in your Item --> Details field "Statistical value" (VBRP-KOWR).
As per standard working of the system: if an order item has a rejection reason (field VBAP-ABGRU) then the billing item is always set statistical (VBRP-KOWRR = 'X'), no matter the setting in transaction OVAG (for the reason for rejection). You may want to check in your customizing if you have the implemented customizing copy-routine '002'.
Hope the above helps.
Thanks.

Similar Messages

  • Contract Release Value is not updated with Confirmation or Invoice value

    The release value for a contract in SRM EBP shows the value of purchase orders created using that contract.  It does not take into account confirmation and/or invoice values.
    For example I create a PO for 10 items at £100/each using Contract ABC.  The total value of the PO is £1000 and the release value contract ABC would be £1000.  If I then only confirm and invoice 5 items (£500) for the PO, the release value of contract ABC stays at £1000 even though I would expect it to update to £500
    Therefore the release value of the contract could be incorrectly overstated if purchase orders are created against the contract but not actually invoiced/confirmed for their total value.
    Please could you confirm the correct functionality and how I could find out the the true invoice value of purchases made using a contract?

    Hi
    <u>Which SRM and R/3 versions are you using ?</u>
    <b>Meanwhile, please go through the following SAP OSS Notes, which will help in this case -></b>
    Note 622045 Net value in release overview of contract is incorrect
    Note 493519 Release quantities are not updated
    Note 1108322 BBP_CONTRACT_CHECK wrong calculation of values
    Note 1102886 Contracts: Lesser Field length for Target Value
    Note 1082548 Check of Released quantity and released value in contract
    Note 656181 Release synchronization of releases on services
    Note 874920 Currency not allowed to be changed for a 'Released' Contract
    Note 703771 Resetting release values during purchase order item deletion
    Note 643823 BLAREL: Incorrect values in service segment
    Note 519879 BBP_CTR_MAIN: No message when values in Contract are reset
    Note 520734 Target value not converted if currency is changed
    Note 528897 Documents not displayed in contract release order overview
    Note 430373 BBP_CON_MNT: No releases available
    Note 491993 Entry of contracts with target values
    Note 437491 Purchase contract: Incorrect update of the call-off values
    Note 406799 BBP_CON_MNT: Fields after contract release ready for input
    Note 398168 Purchase contract: Target value is not changed
    <b>Do let me know.</b>
    Regards
    - Atul

  • Customer ledger receivables are showing less as per Invoice value.

    Hi
    we have checked randomly and found that in few cases Invoice amount which is reflecting in our customer ledger is basic value insted of " net selling value" ( basic price + Tax Price ). Due to which in my customer ledger receivables are showing less as per Invoice value.
    If any body not understand this problem, please send email id.  i will send you screen shot.
    my email id: [email protected]
    Attaching Scrren shot of customer ldeger for customer " Tristar
    Attaching mannually working file for your reference

    Hi
    Is this RP/RW report or standard report ledger ...you are referring , if it is CO-PA report then it will the problem in the forkula. If you double clik on that field you will get the formula ....
    VVr

  • Invoice blocking due to tolerance limit at header Invoice Value.

    Hi,
    Our client needs to have tolerance limit set for total Invoice value.The Invoice contains multiple line items.The tolerance may be % or $ value.The standard setting which I know is for each Invoice line item but not for cummulative.The issue is if we post exceed but within tolerance amount for each line item from the Invoice containing multiple line items,the total Invoice value exceeds considerably.
    Please let me know the how to deal with this issue?

    Hi Mandar,
    Set Tolerance Limits:
    In this step, you specify the tolerance limits for each tolerance key for each company code.
    When processing an invoice, the R/3 System checks each item for variances between the invoice and the purchase order or goods receipt. The different types of variances are defined in tolerance keys.
    As per your req ,it is not possible to compare PO Net header value with GR Total value and Toatl Invoice value because PO , GR and Invoice may contain the different line items.
    we are always doing Invoice verification at item level not on header level so SAP provides all the keys at item level only.
    Rewards if helpful...
    Regards
    Sanjay L

  • Gross ,net invoice posting

    hi sap gurus
    what will be postings in case of gross invoice receipt and net invoice receipt.like this is case of gross posting what will be tn case of net invoice posting
    tm PK Account    Account short            Tx           Amount                                                                               
    1 31 SPBG       M/S SPERRY PLAST              1,210.100-          
    2 86 13110100   GR/IR-Clearing –           V1       1,000.000 
    3 40 50600000   FREIGHT INWA            V0        100.000 
    4 40 13113920   CENVAT CLEARI          V1        160.000 
    5 40 13113920   CENVAT CLEARI          V1        100.000 
    6 40 13113920   CENVAT CLEARI          V1         4.800 
    7 50 13114010   TDS - 194A BAS  OT                 154.700-

    If material is at MAP:
    During GR:
    stock account  at  PO price (material MAP is updated in material master)
    GR/IR account(PO price)
    During IR:
    GR/IR account(PO price)
    Vendor account(amount entered in invoice)
    If any difference and stock coverage is there differnce value will go in stock account otherwise PPD account.
    If material is at standard price:
    During GR:
    stock account  at  material price in material master
    GR/IR account(PO price)
    PPD aacount if differnce between PO and material price
    During IR:
    GR/IR account(PO price)
    Vendor account(amount entered in invoice)
    If any difference amount will goto PPD account
    Reward if helpful

  • Invoice value greater that PO value

    Hello sap gurus,
    In our company we do the invoice with nonvaluated GR for non stock items.
    Now the issue is ,suppose there are 2 line items in the PO,one item has net value 70 Rs & 2nd is 30Rs,
    i did invoice for 1st item 80 rs. & for 2nd item 20 rs,system will not give any error as total value 100rs is not exceeding & i have put the error massage if it exceeds the PO value.
    Now i dont want to exceed the invoice value more than PO value at item level which i did above.
    Is this possible to put restriction if it exceeds the po value at item level
    Please suggest

    Hi Desai,
    You can set tolerance limits under Materials Management  Logistics Invoice Verification  Invoice Block  Set Tolerance Limits. Once you add new entry, you will find possible tolerance keys that you can use, in your case PP and KW.
    Best regards

  • User exit for pricing to calcumlate net sales value and taxat billing level

    Hi,
    Can anyone suggest me , which user exit i can used for below scenario.
    Create a new user exit attached to pricing procedure ZXTNIC in order to exclude the conditions YTN1 & YTN2 from the calculation of the net sales value and include the value of the conditions YTN1 & YTN2 to the calculation of the Tax vale.
    From pricing procedure ZXTNIC need the net value to be till line 500 only and exclude the value of the conditions YTN1 & YTN2
    BACKGROUND
    Inter-company invoice is not calculated correctly in terms on the net sales value. The calculation of the net sales value is correct as some conditions are included in the calculations which must be excluded.
    The reason for creating the user exist is that any change in the pricing conditions class can not be used to exclude them from the net price, without totally changing the concept behind the conditions (new conditions, new access sequence in taxes, IC changes and so on).
    FUNCTIONAL DETAILS
    The user exit will run on the values of the line item and the header of the pricing conditions
    The user exit will subtract the current net value from the value of the conditions YTN1 & YTN2, also the Tax value will be added to the value of the conditions YTN1 & YTN2.
    Need the Net value = 8,032 and not 8,882
    This value will be calculated as follows = Current Net u2013 YTN1 u2013 YTN2 = 8,882 u2013 0,773 u2013 0,077 = 8,032
    Need the Tax value = 2,395 and not 1,545
    This value will be calculated as follows = Current Tax + YTN1 + YTN2 =     1,545 + 0,773 + 0, 077 = 2,395
    Regards,
    Jayaram

    solved

  • How to get PO DELIVERED VALUE AND PO INVOICED VALUE

    HI experts,
    how to get po delivered and po invoiced valued in
    order currency. Am unable find out in my bw targets and data sources. We hav 2lis_scl nd generic ds for purchase rEquisitions.
    br,
    RAvi

    Kindly once check datsouce 0FI_GL_4.
    In that field DMSHB (Deb/cred amt) is for Invoice and NETWR (Net value) is for PO value.
    Further please check with ECC guys and get confirmation.
    Thanks,
    Jitender.

  • Not showing Net Order Value in PO Currency in ALV report

    Dear all,
    Good day.
    In my ALV report i want to display net order value in PO currency which comes from ekpo-netwr field. But this field is showing 0.00 for all records. i,e value is not coming here. Please tell me how to show the value in ALV and how to show blank space when value is not in database.
    Thanks.
    Best regards.

    Hi,
    Place a break-point just before you call the ALV display "Reuse_alv_*".
    Check the value here in the column price.
    Most probably you do not have a value here which is why there is no value displayed.
    Regards,
    Jovito

  • PO Release Strategy not triggerred for particular Total Net Order Value

    Dear,
    I am currently facing the issue where release strategy for purchase orders is not getting triggered for a particular value or lower.
    For order value 1 INR or less, no release strategy is triggered for new created PO. And for value > 1 INR release strategy is getting triggered.
    All otehr PO characterstics are the same, I mean to say the values for other characterstics such as plant material group are identical.
    But the characterstics for release for Total net order value are <= 30000 INR. There are two system copies, where in one system the same release strategy is working as expected. But in other system the above mentioned issue occurs. There is no differnce which I can see in the release strategy setup.
    Please suggest for solution.
    Thank you.
    Warm Regards.

    Dear All,
    While looking further into the issue by going into debugging mode, we have found that in include LCLSCF2I, Internal table p_selection_criteria_tab , the value for ATFLV (Internal Floating point from) gets different values in the two systems. For example, in the affected system, for PO with 1INR tottal value, for one of the Total value chaaracterstics before INR characterstic, ATFLV value is 0,0000000000000000E+00, hence it gets out of loop and doesn't trigger release strategy.
    But in another system for same PO values and release setup, ATFLV value is 1,0000000000000000E+00 for that characterstic.
    May I know how the value for this field gets calculated.
    Thank you.
    Warm Regards.

  • How to update excise invoice values after migo.

    Hi Guru's,
    I have checked the forum. but did not get exact solution.
    Here im having the problem with  bapi  BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE . This bapi don't have the structure to update excise invoice values.
    I have one bapi  'BAPI_EXCINV_CREATE_FROMDATA'  to update the excise duty, but in that also i didn't find the structure
    'J_1IEXITEM'  to update the ECS value ( field is 'total_ecs').
    Please help me on this,Thanks in Advance...
    Regards
    Naren

    Hi Krishna
    Do not do excise invoice capture during 103. At that time select the option "No excise entry". Then capture excise invoice during 105.
    The system messge " No selectable items for this document" is prompted since the preceeding document is already assigned with invoice.
    Try this and give feedback.
    regards
    sairam akundi

  • Error while calculating the net present value

    Dear experts,
    Please help me in solving the following error.
    I am trying to do project vaibility analysis through pre investment analysis in appropriation request, interm I'm trying to calculate the IRR for the project.
    I have created the appropriation request and given all the data in that including the planed values for the project.
    In Variants tab of appropriation request, preinv. analysis sub tab, i have clicked the button Calculate preinvestment analysis figures , ( I hvae not mentioned any values in that screen, its picking the plan cost from the planed values of the appropriation request) there I'm getting an error saying
    Error while calculating the net present value
    If I open the message it is as follows:
    Error while calculating the net present value*
    *Message no. AO215*
    Diagnosis
    An error occurred during calculation of the net present value.
    The yield curve for determining the net present value is not completely maintained. Possible causes are:
    1. Evaluation type IM01 does not exist (table ATSYC).
    2. Yield curve types 9990 (bid) and 9991 (ask) have not been created (table JBD14) for the currency of the controlling area of the appropriation request.
    3. Reference interest rates have not been created for the yield curves (tables T056R and JBD15).
    4. Interest rates are not maintained for the complete planning time period for the reference interest rates.
    5. Under certain circumstances, the standard exchange rate types 'G' and 'B' may be inconsistent.
    Procedure
    Check your Customizing settings:
    1. SAP supplies the evaluation types.
    Remember, SAP supplies the evaluation types in client 000. You have to copy them into your working clients. If you do not have them in your system, you can create them in Customizing for the Treasury component (Treasury Management -> Market Risk Management -> Evaluations -> Define Default Settings). Create evaluation type IM01 with bid yield curve type 9990 and ask yield curve type 9991.
    2. In Customizing for appropriation requests (under Planning), create a bid yield curve type 9990 and an ask yield curve type for the currency of the controlling area of the appropriation request.
    3. Create at least one reference interest rate for each yield curve.
    4. Maintain the reference rates, starting at the minimum fron the point at which you you have planned costs or revenue.
    5. Check Customizing of the exchange rate types 'G' and 'B' in the IMG under Global Settings -> Currencies.
    I have checked all the procedures of the said customization and the values are similar to that of the error message, but still I'm unable to proceed further.
    I have goe through the note 160375, but did not succeed on this issue.
    Can any one help me out in solving the above error and also can any one explain me the process in SAP to calculate IRR?
    Is there any more customization missing or whats wrong going in that process?
    Please help me out...
    Thanks in advance..
    Regards,
    Praveen.

    Are you installing a Demo version of NetWeaver? If so please post your questions and search for answers here: SAP NetWeaver Application Server
    If this a real full blown system please contact the OSS, via the Marketplace (service.sap.com) or by OSS transaction in your SAP System.

  • Posting Unplanned Depreciation when asset net book value is zero

    We recently transferred some assets from one company code to another.  However, when they transferred, the depreciation all reversed out YTD.
    We are now trying to post the YTD depreciation back in under the original company code, but when we try posting unplanned depreciation, the following error message appears -
    "In area 01, you can only post manual dep. up to the amount 0.00"
    I believe this is because the asset does not have any net book value now.
    Any suggestions on how to resolve this?
    Many thanks,

    Hi Susan,
    do you have the option to reverse the transfer postings? If so, you could specify another period control for transfer postings (such as fiscal year start, etc.) in your depreciation key, with which you can influence how much depreciation is left back respectively transferred.
    It is correct that you can´t post an unplanned depreciation on the sending asset now, because the net book value would go below zero. As unplanned depreciation does not influence the ordinary depreciation in the year of posting, this value below zero can not be adjusted with a reduction of planned ordinary depreciation.
    I am wondering which effect you´d like to have on the sending asset. Did you post a complete retirement? If so, there should be no APC left which you can depreciate on the sending asset. And as the net book value is zero already, which effect do you want to get? You have to keep in mind that the non-depreciated APC will be continued to depreciate (normally) on the receiving asset. But maybe I misunderstood the problem here ...
    Regards,
    Markus

  • Transaction in area 01 contradicts the net book value rule

    Transaction in area 01 contradicts the net book value rule

    hi
    check your depreciation area and depreciation key settings and rules maintained

  • Calculation of Depreciation on Net Book Value after posting Revaluation on

    How to calculate the depreciation on Net book value after posting Balance sheet revaluation ABAW? The depreciation is been calculated on APC and not on NBV, as the APC of asset has been revalued after the revalution posting, ideally the next period depreciation should be calculating on the new NBV, but the system is not doing this. Is there any specific configuration that Iam missing here.
    Kindly Reply.
    Jyoti

    The forum [FPM - General|Enterprise Performance Management (SAP EPM); in which you originally posted your question deals mainly with the financial performance applications otherwise known as Enterprise Performance Management (EPM) carrying the BusinessObjects brand.   Your question pertains to SAP [ERP Financials - Asset Accounting|SAP ERP Financials  - Asset Accounting; which is covered by another forum.  Therefore your message has been moved.  Please adjust any bookmarks you might have and post to the appropriate area in the future, that way you are assured you will have the right audience reading your posts.
    Thanks and best regards,
    [Jeffrey Holdeman|http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/profile/Jeffrey+Holdeman]
    SAP Labs, LLC
    BusinessObjects Division
    Americas Customer Solutions Adoption (CSA) team

Maybe you are looking for

  • Conversion of XML file from ANSI to UTF-8 encoding in SAP 4.6C

    Hi All,   Im working on SAP 4.6C version.I have generated a XML file from my custom report.It is downloading in ANSI format.But i need to download this into UTF-8 format.So can anyone please let me know how to do this? Is this possible in 4.6C versio

  • A more Unix-like way to instant message

    I've been using Pidgin for IM'ing and it's working satisfactorily so far. But I want to be able to IM from within a terminal, or from within emacs.   I'm not happy with the emacs jabber client and I do need many more protocls than just that. Is there

  • Why can I not get my windows to fit the screen

    I am not sure what happened today, but in Safari the window does not fit the screen on my Mac Book Pro, even when you click the green + button. What should I do to rectify. I have done a full Shutdown, and still the same.

  • MIR5:  MIRO Blocked Invoices

    Hello Gurus- What are reasons why documents would not become FI documents in MIRO?  This is confusing to me because I get a document number but I don't see it under the Vendor?  What are some causes and their solutions? In reviewing MIR5, I noticed i

  • Location Services in Standby

    Does location services continue to drain battery power if the phone is in standby? Does it also drain power if you're using an app that does not use location services? Thanks.