Net Value is minus in complaint ?????

Hi all,
I'm implementing complaints.
I'm using the standard complaint pricing procedure.
After entering a price in condition OPR0 the end value and the Net Value are calculated to:
Price * quantity * -1
Does any one know why the value become minus ?
Thanks in advance,
Eran

Hi Amith,
Keep calculation C for that condition.
Regards,
Madhu.
Edited by: madhurao123 on Sep 14, 2011 4:09 PM

Similar Messages

Sales Condition, but not totalling to net value in SO

Hello,
We have costs which we need to post to certain GL accounts, to do this I created new condition type (not have statistical ticked in procedure). This is for royalty process, whereby every SO which we sell to every customers, we will pay 3% of sales to another party.
- Problem, if dont tick statistical, wrong values get posted to customer because we're adding 3% to credit customer.
- If tick statistical, values dont get transfered to accounting.
Is there any better way we can use to not allow values to be totalled into net value in SO, but still be able to bill and post to accounting?

You can achieve this requirement by creating New Condition Type ( suppose XYZ ) with Calculation Type as Percentage & Plus/minus as -ve . Add this Condition Type below the Condition Type for Royalty Process (suppose ABC ) with Step Number as the one of Condition Type ABC in From Column in the Pricing Procedure.
You would have to mention the Account key for Condition Type ABC & maintain 100 % Condition Record for Condition type XYZ & no Account key should be assigned against Condition Type XYZ.
Best Regards,
Ankur

Free sample sales net value in invoice should give zero value.

Hello Experts,
I have a question on the cess values aspect of free sample sales.Recently, I have configured a free sample sales for one of our clients. Now, in the invoice the user does not want the cess values to be passed to the customer.I changed the R100 discount type in the pricing control data, still tax is picked up, showing negative net value and not zero. Now, how to arrive at excise payable as credit entry and octoroi etc as debit entry in G/L accounts. or where I am going wrong, please suggest.
Regards,
Raj.

For sample sales that is you are despatching material on free of cost, follow the steps mentioned below
1) In V/06, you should create a condition type, say ZDIS (for 100% discount) and maintain the following:-
Cond. class::::::A
Calculat.type::::A
Plus/minus:::::::X
Item condition:::X
Amount/percent:::X
Delete:::::::::::X
Value::::::::::::X
Save the condition type
2) In OV34, create two new Account Keys, one for PR00 and one for 100% discount. Say the two Account Keys are ZSM and ZSP
3) In V/08, against PR00 condition type, assign Account Key ZSM with a tick in "Required". Next for condition type ZDIS, assign the another Account Key ZSP without any tick in the three boxes. Against this discount condition type, assign the step number of net value under the tab "From", assuming that after PR00 you have multiple condition types.
4) In FS00, create a new G/L Account with description as Sales Promotion Expenses
5) In VKOA maintain these two Account Keys for the sales organisation / chart of accounts with the same G/L account for both the Account Keys. Dont assign different G/L Account here.
6) Now create a sale order and do billing. See how the accounting document flows. Post still if you have any issues.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

ONLY Net Value should hit the Sales Revenue GL account

Hi,
My client has a requirement where he does NOT want to hit PR00 & Discount separately to different GL account. They want that the net amount (i;e PR00 - Discount) should only be hit to Sales Revenue GL account.
I removed the Account Key from this condition types in the pricing procedure but then it is giving the account determination error.
They dont want to have Dummy GL account also for this PR00 & Discount.
Kindly suggest what settings can be done to hit ONLY Net Amount to the Sales Revenue account.
Thanks in advance....
Edited by: vk@sap on Sep 30, 2010 1:55 PM

Hi
Step 10 ---PR00 say Rs 100 mark it as statistical
Step 20 ---K005 say Rs 10% mark it as statistical
Step 30 --- No condition type --In the description maintain NETT value System will automatically bring Rs 90 here ( in step 30 )
Important thing---Assign SUBTOTAL ---D in step 30
Step 40 ---ZNET ---Assign Alternate calculation type 12 and account key
Now the value of step 30 that is Rs 90 will automatically flow in step 40 which will be taken to accounts through account key
PR00 and K005 wont hit accounts and this ZNET will hit accounts
This will complete your requirements
The config of ZNET in V/06 should be
Condition class A
Calculation type as G
Manual entries as C
Item condition ticked
Plus/ minus as BLANK and rest everything untouched
This will 200 % fulfill your requirement and configure exactly the same just takes 10 mins and give me feedback
Regards
Raja

What formula do I use to show the net value (less 23% tax).

In Numbers, what formula do I use to show the net value (i.e. less 23% tax).

thejuddo writes:
"$100 plus sales tax of 23% would be $123.00 but in order to get the net value of $123.00 less the tax I would have to divide by 1.23 not multiply by 23% and then minus it."
Correct;
The 23% tax is 23 one hundredths of the base amount, and is applied to that amount. As a formula, this can be stated as:
=B2+B2*C2
or
=B2*(1+C2)
(either applying to the data arrangement shown in the top table, and entered in D2 of that table)
In the other direction, though (bottom table), we start with the Gross amount and the Tax rate as known quantities, from which we are to determine the base amount, remembering that the 23% Tax rate is 23% of the Base amount, not 23% of the Gross amount.
Rewriting the two formulas above as equations, with g, b, and t as the variables, we get:
g = b + (b * t)
g = b(1+t)
Solving the second for b:
b - g/(1+t)
Expressed as a formula (with the data as arranged in the bottom table, and the formula in D2):
D2: =B2/(1+C2)
In both directions, it may be prudent to round the result to the nearer hundredth, as done here for the calculation immediately above:
=ROUND(B2/(1+C2),2)
Regards,
Barry

Tax Value not flowing to NET Value

Dear Guru's
I am facing a problem in TAXINN, Tax amount is visible and updating at item level but at header level value is not getting added up. For example
Base price = 100
BEDECessShecess = 14.42
LST Or Vat = 14.40 on 114.42
net value in item level showing 114.42 and tax 14.40, but when i go back and see the header level Net value it is showing 114.42 instead of 128.82.
All the setting are checked through a search in SDN and done the corrections still not coming.
Regards,
Sudhir

Dear GSL,
But still the Net value in the sales order initial screen has to show the total otherwise the Enduser or the Key user may get confused. As a consultant we can tell that both the values go to different table so the value will display only the total value minus tax amount. Is that so.
Kindly suggest me how to go about the same
regards,
Sudhir

Basic Price is not added in Net Value

Dear All,
In sales Order, Basic Price is not added in Net Value.
Thanks & Regards,
PM

kindly let us know which condition type is used for basic price - and check the condition type whether the condition class is mentioned as "C".
and in plus/minus maintain positive
regards,
Sudhir

Net value determination

Hi Gurus,
can anybody help me for solving the following problem;
scenario 1: i am creating opportunity for end customer and a follow up document is to be created as a quotation where the sold to party get changed automatically(i customized through partner determination procedure) and both the business partner end customer(in opportunity) and sold to party (in quotation) if at all the business partner are different but sales area details are exactly same. still the net value is not getting determined in quotation.
when i delete the distribution channel and again redetermination of org unit attribute with same distribution channel(in quotation) the net value get determined
Scenario2. when i am creating a service order for the same end customer while creating a follow-up document as complaint the sold party get changed as sales partner(like above scenario) so the complaint order did not get replicate into r/3, if i keep the same business partner*(end customer) in complaint too the it get replicated.
But the clients requirment is that to keep separte sold to party in quotation and complaint so what i need to do ....
please help me for this.
Regards
Jolly Sabi

please share with us how u resolved this issue..
thanks and regards
shanto aloor

Free goods by header net value not Quantity

Regards
My client wants to make a sales promotions as the free goods SD. The difference is that free goods should not be given by the bought quantity of certain material, they should be given from the header net value of an order.
For example:
If a customer have an order with header net value of 100$ from only materials that has certain material pricin group, it should receive one free good.( All the materials in the order have the same material pricing group)
If a customer have an order with header net value of 200$ from only materials that has certain material pricin group, it should receive two free goods.
If there are ways to make this happen please let me know i would really appreciate it.
Thanks
Edited by: Ronald Caroli on Feb 13, 2008 9:13 PM

Hi ronald,
The userexit option is very tough to do.
You are using a right userexit, but how are you coding it? Whats your design and flow?
The BDC are programmable recordings of a standard transaction. Hence you will be able to record the way in which you add a line item to sales order. Ths recording is automatically converted into lines of code by SAP. Then you insert your checks and balances between these lines of code to make it behave the way you want the sequence of transactions to work.
My thought was to make a recording of adding a new line item, in change sales order transaction(va02), with item category as Free of Charge(FOC). Then in the code, I wanted to check for material pricing group, if found correct, then would go finding the net value of sales document. If the value is above the limit, calculate the target quantity. Then follow the rest of the recording and add a new line with FOC as item category.
But this was a seperate transaction, which could be applied seperately and not to be done automatically in sales order. This was becuase say if you switch off the promotion tomorrow, then you will not have to worry abt removing the same functionality from sales order, you just need to de-activate the transaction.
Then there would be issues of doing hardcoding the net value limits, free good quantity in the user exit which is not at all recommended.
Hope this helps.
Abhishek

Contract net value problem

Hi,
I created a material PO for net value 100 eur for a contract
of target VALUE 1000 eur.Now i create a GR for
that PO for 50 EUR.Now i set the delivery completed
indicator,then i can set contract net value gets updated to 50 EUR.
Now i created a service contract and service PO with
same target value and net value
But in the case of service po,i create a service entry sheet for 50 EUR,then contract net value is not getting updated to 50 EUR.
Why it behaves differently for material and service POs?

I have Simulated your issue..
I have Created a Service Contract with Line Item 'D" for 1000 INR.
Later I have raised release Order for 200 INR..
as soon as the Release Order was approved , the Net Value in Contract updated to " 200 INR"..
Still SES is pending for that...
If you want I can send you screen shot...

Contract net value for Header Statistics is not correct

There is issue with value contract. The net value for Header Statistics is not showing correctly for some contracts. Especially, when we delete the PO line items or reverse all entries (GR and IR) for PO line item.
Contract has one line with account category ‘U’. The target value is 300,000.00 and total quantity released to date is 160,000. The net value for Header Statistics should be 140,000 but it is showing 600,000 which is over (double) the target value and user cannot release any further PO reference to this contract.
Earlier I defined net price for line item 300,000 and I changed net price to zero and execute report RM06ENP0 but it doesn’t work.
Please share your experience and thoughts.
Thanks,
Shah.

Hi Jurgen,
There are few Purchace orders with multiple line items and each line item for Purchase orders referencing the same line and same contract.
There is only one Purchase order has two deleted lines against this contract.
Theses deleted line's net price has changed to zero and there is no PO history.
Contract released order value is correct as there is only one line, but net price is wrong. and user is getting error for target value is excedeed by $nnn when trying to create purchase order.
Thanks,
Shah.

Line item Net value is not coming in Header Net Value

Hi All,
I have four conditions
1) A condition with condition cat.Price this is annual price condition and condition value comes from condition record.
2) B condition with condition cat.Discount & Surcharge this is monthly dis. and condition value comes from condition record.
3) C condition with condition cat.Discount & Surcharge this is monthly dis. and condition value comes through pricing routine(formula value).
4) D condition with condition cat.Discount & Surcharge this is monthly dis. and condition value comes by USER EXIT (this value is basically pervious month condition C Net value) .
5) E condition with condition cat.Discount & Surcharge this is monthly dis. and condition value comes through pricing routine (formula is condition C - D and resultant value should come in condition E)
When i am creating sales order for Jan month sales order
condition A , B, C is considered and value of condition E comes perfectly in net value column of line item and in net value of sales header matches.
But When i creating sales order for Feb month sales order header net value
condition A , B, C, D is considered and value of condition E comes perfectly in net value column of line item and in net value of sales header does not match. In net value of header system is considering only Condition value C.
So my query is why system is considering condition C value and why not the Net value of line item.
My PP is as follow:
Step          Cond.type      From      to       Man      Reg     St   subtotal      Req   Caltype Bastype
10     A                    X       2
20     B                    X       2
30     C                    X       2         601
40     D                    X       2
50     Net value     30     40          X        1
60     E          50                 2         25            5
70     Total           60
Please help me where is going wrong.
Thanks & regards
Sree

Hi Sanjay
Just go to V/06 and check wheather header data has been checked or not. That could be the reason it has not copied to header data
Regards
Srinath

Static Credit Limit Check for Sales Orders - Net Value vs Credit Value

We are testing order credit check and we have run into a problem with the Static Credit Limit Check. The Static Credit Limit Check is set to use both Order and Delivery Values. SAP uses the values in S066 and S067 to determine what values it uses to check against the credit limit. Standard SAP uses the confirmed quantity times the credit price to get the order values - this is the credit value.
So the problem is, once an order is released it is set up so it does not go back on credit hold, so anything which is not confirmed (but could be) it a potential credit value which is unaccounted for in the credit exposure and the customer can go over the credit limit.
Additionally, we run AFS and have items which are rejected with a J0 rejection code (unconfirmed) which have the potential of being confirmed and shipped and we want to include these items in the value of the order which is being checked against the credit limit (along with the deliveries, invoices and receivables).
Here is a quick example.
Customer has a credit limit of $100 (no deliveries, invoices or receivables - to keep it simple)
Order 1 is placed with a credit value of $50.00 but a potential value of $100 (the other half is J0) - this passes the credit check since $50.00 is less than the limit.
Order 2 is placed for $50.00 and has a credit value of $50. This also gets approved.
At this point, the credit limit used is 100% (based on standard SAP)
Then Order1 backorder is confirmed and the new credit value is now $100. This order now puts the customer over their limit and if the order had been released would not go back on credit hold and therefore the customer is not over their credit limit by 50%.
What I want is for Order1 to be credit checked for the $100 not the $50 so the exposure is correct.
Does anyone have any suggestions as to how we could use the Net Value of the order to perform the static credit check? And any thoughts on how to determine the correct credit exposure (open order value plus items which are J0, plus deliveries, plus invoices, plus receivables)?
I am thinking about a Z table to track the adjusted values on the orders and then use one of the customer checks to do a static credit check with the adjusted value. And for the exposure, use the adjusted value to recalculate the values in F.35 to show a more accurate view of the credit exposure.
Does anyone have an easier way to do this? Any advice is appreciated.
Thanks,
Suzanne

Hi Suzzane,
In the scenario that you have provided, in the first order items worth 50$ are rejected. Hence standard SAP will not take this into account as this item is rejected.Two solutions can be provided here:
1) The line item can have a delivery block instead of a reason for rejection.This way the 50$ will get accounted.However, if this is against customer norms as this will appear in the order acknowledgment, this cannot be used.
2) User exit can be used where a credit check can be triggered once the document value changes, even though the document has a released status.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Vinu

Not able to cancel the Credit Note due to "Net Value could not be 0" error

Hi Gurus
We have created the Credit Memo Request with ref. to invoice and PGR , and against that Credit Memo Request entered Credit Note .
Credit Note is showing 0 Net Value and no accounting document generated .
Further system is not allowing to cancel the billing document i.e. credit note .
Pls. Suggest how can we cancel the billing document i.e. credit note and recreate it.
Regds
PR

I wrote that system is not allowing us to create the cancel document with 0 net value.
I need to cancel this document , so that i can recreate new one.
Regards
PR

Sales order report with Net value (NETWR) and Tax amount (MWSBP)

Hi all,
I would like to know if somebody know if exist a report of sales order where it can see the Net value and the Tax amount per sales order.
Regards,
Mariano.

You can read those details directly in the table VBAP.
There are fields for COST, Subtotal1, to subtotal 6, which carries values for netvalue, discounts etc. Depending on the system pricing procedure sub total set-up you can read the tax from one of the sub-total fields.
You can develop an ABAP query by joining tables VBAK and VBAP, to get the required outputs if needed. Or you can download the VBAP values into an Excel application, where user can manipulate the details.
Regards,

Net Value is minus in complaint ?????

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for