Hi RONVER-Systems,
I cannot see the first image, just doesn't want to come up. Knowing the behavior of a switch I can imagine "broadcast' traffic being received on each port.
It would be more relavvnt if you could use wireshark (a freeware 'sniffer' program) and try the same capture again and post the capture file as a .cap file.
But you obviously will see broadcast traffic arrive at each switch port. The switches will route at Layer 2 any unicast traffic. But lets check out the capture file you send in again.
Sorry for this bother, I just can't see the first image you posted.
regards Dave

Similar Messages

Denying all traffic on the inside unless specified

Hi Is there a way to configure my asa5505 to dent all traffic on the inside so i can specify what ip or host can access specific protocol or ports via access list? im thinking mabe i ned to set the inside security level to 0 also and then specify any ideas.

Hi,
Well it is pretty simple,
You will have to use ACL and simply only allow the traffic you need to allow. Since the ACL automatically denies any traffic that isnt specifically permitted you dont really need any deny statements even.
You cant make specific rules with the "security-level" alone and using an interface ACL basically makes the "security-level" useless for the most part.
As soon as you configure an ACL like this for example
access-list INSIDE-IN permit tcp any host 1.1.1.1 eq 80
access-group INSIDE-IN in interface inside
It will mean that only traffic that is allowed is TCP/80 traffic to destination IP address 1.1.1.1. All other traffic will be blocked because of the Implicit Deny in every ACL. It wont show in the CLI configuration. Naturally if you want you can always add the deny rule to the ACL to see the hitcount of traffic that has not matched the previous rules
access-list INSIDE-IN permit tcp any host 1.1.1.1 eq 80
access-list INSIDE-IN deny ip any any
access-group INSIDE-IN in interface inside
You will have to make sure that you dont block any essential services your users might need like usually HTTP, HTTPS, DNS for example. It really depends on what you are trying to achieve.
- Jouni

When I connect imac to network via airport all devices on the network lose internet connectivity

Every device stays connected to the network but the internet stops working. Usually the network will continue to function normally for about five minutes when the imac connects, but then every device loses internet access via the network, NOT just the imac. As soon as I turn off the imac's airport they get internet connectivity back. A wired network connection to the imac seems to work OK.
The airport is configured as "Using DHCP"
Mac OS X 10.6.8
As far as I know, no changes have been made to the computer recently (but it is not my machine and the owner isn't here atm)
I found one other resource with the same problem here:
http://www.mac-forums.com/forums/internet-networking-wireless/183185-turning-my- macbook-airport-breaks-internet-connection-entire-network.html
but the solution didn't work. When I deleted the three files mentioned in the solution in that thread, my problem is not solved.
If you have any ideas or need more information I would love to hear from you.
Thanks guys.

Yes it is possible that the two machines are creating a Computer-to-Computer network and are not going through the Express.
To delete the Alias you may need to login with the Admin User.
Will
1GHz G4, 15" PowerBook, Airport Network, 1G iPod Mini Mac OS X (10.4.5) Updated - Get Started with iWeb (WillG4PB.com)

My phone is not ringing on all incoming calls (the switch on the side is on at the time of the incoming call), what can I do to have all calls ring?

My iPhone 5 is not ringing on all of the incoming calls even though the side switch is on. Not sure what to do? Anyone else having this problem with incoming calls?

I had a friend with the same problem, he had Do Not Disturb ON, you can see if yours is ON, if it is, turn it OFF.
You can learn more about it here, Use Do Not Disturb on your iPhone, iPad, or iPod touch

NM-16ESW - adding a switch into a 3725 router slot - can i route traffic out of the switch ?

Hi all,
I have added the above module R16#show ip int br
Interface IP-Address FastEthernet0/0 unassigned FastEthernet0/1 unassigned FastEthernet1/0 unassigned FastEthernet1/1 unassigned FastEthernet1/2 unassigned FastEthernet1/3 unassigned FastEthernet1/4 unassigned FastEthernet1/5 unassigned FastEthernet1/6 unassigned FastEthernet1/7 unassigned FastEthernet1/8 unassigned FastEthernet1/9 unassigned FastEthernet1/10 unassigned FastEthernet1/11 unassigned FastEthernet1/12 unassigned FastEthernet1/13 unassigned FastEthernet1/14 unassigned FastEthernet1/15 unassigned Vlan1 unassigned R16(config-if)#int fa1/0
R16(config-if)#ip address 192.168.10.1 % IP addresses may not be configured R16(config-if)#
q1) Not being able to set IP q2) in that case, since the Assuming fe0/1 on the router and 2 workstations attached Regards,
Noob (16 switch port) into my router.
OK? Method Status Protocol
YES unset administratively down down
YES unset administratively down down
YES unset administratively down down
YES unset administratively down down
YES unset administratively down down
YES unset administratively down down
YES unset administratively down down
YES unset administratively down down
YES unset administratively down down
YES unset administratively down down
YES unset administratively down down
YES unset administratively down down
YES unset administratively down down
YES unset administratively down down
YES unset administratively down down
YES unset administratively down down
YES unset administratively down down
YES unset administratively down down
YES unset up down
255.255.255.0
on L2 links.
to the interface as shown above, I would believe it is really a switch port. Is there anyway I can see what kind of port a interface is or can be ? (switch port, routed port etc ?) or whether is it a L2 or L3 switch ?
switch is already inside the router, how do i route L3 traffic out of the switch ?
is the interface connected to external network.
to the switch ports fe1/1 and and fe1/2, how can i set their gateway to point to fe0/1's IP ? Can fe0/1 to be connected to fe1/0 internally ?

Hi KOE SIZE JIE,
q1) I tried the no switchport command on the 16switch port module and it works. I can set an IP on the switch port. But according to Liam, it is a L2 switch, how come we can assign no switchport command ?
As Bilal pointed out, I was mistaken you can issue the "no switchport" for a L3 routed port on that specific module.
q2) it is said that on a L2 switch only 1 SVI can be connected (for management purpose only) and L2 switch is not able to do routing. With the L2 switch module inserted into the router, will the SVI be able to do routing then ?
I believe this goes back to what Bilal was saying about limited functionality on the EtherSwitch. I will have to play with one in GNS3 to give you a solid answer.
But I think what it is trying to say is... You cannot use SVI's for inter-vlan routing. You can only have a single SVI for management purposes.
q3)Liam, you mention earlier fa0/0 is pointing to some network. is fa0/0 in the same router as the 16 switchport module ?
ip route 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.254 -- this command seems to be saying to access the 10.10.10.0 network, please go to the next hop IP 192.168.1.254 (but again, you are setting this next hop IP on the current router interface itself) - did i get anything wrong ?
I have read back my post and this reads wrong.
When i showed you the code snippet, 192.168.1.254 would be the interface on the next hop router. Not the router you are issuing the ip route command on. You would also need an IP address on the router interface directly connected to the next hop router. I.E 192.168.1.253
You will not then receive that error. Sorry about that, my sloppy config without a diagram!
HTHs,
Liam

Dmvpn - all traffic via tunnel ?

Q: I have a dmvpn to a spoke connected via dsl.
presently I have route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 via pppoe (dslam) This allows me to find the home end of the tunnel and bring the tunnel up.
How do I tell the spoke router to route all traffic via the tunnel?
I have eigrp up at the spoke and have advertised 20 or so networks, but i need to provide internet access via this tunnel.
Thanks

I think in this case you can use "vrf"
Just allocate all interfaces into VRF except one which is attached to the internet.

I've Made the Switch (from iWeb) & Lived to Tell About It.

I've gotten a lot of help and useful information from this forum over the years and I will certainly miss it. I've just completed a 2 month transition where I've migrated my site from iWeb/Mobile Me to a new site made in RapidWeaver and hosted by Host Excellence. I figured I'd write a little (or a lot) about my experience, to give some others an idea of what they've got to look forward too. Hopefully it will arm you with some things to do and look out for. While I am describing RapidWeaver here, a lot of this process will be the same no matter what new software you use. I started off being pretty happy with what I had going in iWeb and not being thrilled at all about making the switch. Now I am so glad I made the switch and I am far happier about the new site than I was with the old one. BTW: the new sites address is: http://grillinsmokin.net . Feel free to visit. I think you'll quickly notice some things you simple can't do in iWeb. This isn't a knock against iWeb. I was very happy with iWeb and had no plans to switch. Where it hasn't been developed actively for four years now, it has been left behind somewhat.
To begin at the beginning: I've had a site made with iWeb since January of 2006 called Grillin' & Smokin' that combined my love of outdoor cooking and photography. Over the years it had grown rather large, with 375 photo entry pages and 230 blog pages. The Domain file was around 1.4 GB. This was not something I ever wanted to have to recreate from scratch. However losing MobileMe as a host was taking away Value Added features like the Hit Counter, Slide Show, Blog Comments, Blog Search etc. The handwriting is on the wall for iWeb too. I might have gone on using iWeb, but between losing key features and the fact iWeb was starting to show it's age, it was time for me to move on. Just before the iCloud announcement this Spring, I began researching website building software. I looked at their features, working methodology, themes, plug-ins and extensions. I download trial versions of the software where it was available as well as some of the themes or plugins I might be using. I gotta tell you, at first I was very frustrated and upset, because I was not finding anything that had the ease of use of iWeb and looked like it was going to be able to recreate the appearance of my original site. It appeared to be a series of compromises. I'd like the features of one package but I hated the themes available for that software. Another looked promising but isn't being upgraded regularly. My biggest frustration was some of the iWeb page types just don't exist in other packages. For example the Album Pages where multiple Photo Pages can be grouped and displayed, don't have a direct equivalent in any other package I saw. As part of my discovery process I read reviews of the various packages, including head to head comparisons of some of them. I also visited their discussion forums. After doing this for 3 weeks I "settled" on RapidWeaver. It was under active development; had a thriving developer community turning out a wide variety of add ons, plug-ins and themes; had an active user community & had lots of help resources available. The web pages it produced were standards compliant and you could get nice effects without resorting to Flash. I think the biggest selling point was all of the add-ons-kind of the same advantage the iPhone has with it's App Store.
Once I bought RapidWeaver & a 3rd Party theme, I tried the demo versions of some of the plug-ins and made sample versions of my page types from iWeb in RapidWeaver. I wanted to have a process in place, before I started mass production on the site. You really do need to do some of this homework in advance to avoid unpleasant surprises. The biggest minus I'd turned up about RapidWeaver (RW from this point on) is it didn't handle big sites well at all. The equivalent of the iWeb Domain file is the RapidWeaver Sandwich file or RWSW file. Once the RWSW file reaches 100MB or so you can get crashes or hangs uploading your site. Now 100 MB doesn't sound like much particularly when I was talking about a 1.4GB iWeb Domain File for my site, but RW doesn't include the photos in the RWSW file. Still I knew I was going to have to divide my site across several RWSW files. Initially the plan was to divide it into 3 sites: The main landing pages was one RWSW file and is the site reached by the url for the site. I was going to have a second RWSW file for my blogs and a third for my photos. Ultimately I ended up dividing the photos into 3 RWSW files. These extra files are hosted on sub-domians whose name goes in front of the main domain (http://sub-domain.main-domain.com). This meant some extra setup for me with my web-host, although they made the setup for the 4 sub-domains very easy and they were free. If you have a huge site and will need to split it, you'll want to check with your prospective web host if they charge extra for hosting additional sub-domains. For small iWebs sites this is not an issue-you have one RWSW file and one web address, just like you do now. My having sub-domains also meant more work linking files together across sites. RapidWeaver has something called an Offsite Page which helped with some of this, but having to split my sites up was the biggest PITA for me about the whole process. But knowing about this going in was better than finding out at the end when I tried to upload a single massive site. If you have a small site, the setup for uploading it is as straight forward as iWeb. RW has a built in FTP uploader or you can publish to file and use an FTP client like CyberDuck.
Once I had my site organization in place and had experimented with best practices for recreating each iWeb page type in RW, it was time to begin. I've gotta tell you when I started out I was not a happy camper. I liked the iWeb way of doing things about 70 percent of the time vs 30 percent for RW. At the end of the first week I told myself I have to move on and give up on the past. I was no longer going to be using iWeb and the sooner I embraced the RW way of doing things, the better off I'd be. At this early point it was still hard to see down the road to the end results. No matter what new package you buy, you should try to go with the flow and learn a new way of working. You'll be happier and less frustrated in the end. In my case after having gone through the entire process now, I've ended up changing my opinion. Now that I've gone through the entire process, I like the RapidWeaver way of doing things about 95 percent of the time and 5% for iWeb. That 5 percent is mostly the large site issue I've described. As I began working I was able to reuse much of the text from my iWeb blog in RW. I did have to paste it in as unformatted and reformat it in RW. My pictures were well organized in Aperture which also helped speed the process. One of the things I did is automate some of the tedious repetitious tasks. I created Quickeys macros to do things for me when ever possible. For example I could go to a particular photo page in iWeb and select the first caption. I would then trigger a macro that asked how many captions are on this page. It would then select the caption in iWeb, copy it, switch to RW and paste it in place and repeat XX times. If you know Quickeys or Applescript (I am guessing) there are plenty of opportunities to put it to good use.
RW present a different way of working than you are used to in iWeb and you'll just need to get used to it. What I am describing here would be true of any of the other packages I looked at too. First off it isn't WYSIWYG while you are editing. You are working with fairly basic looking text with few clues as to what the real page looks like. You switch to a preview mode to see what the page looks like in a browser. At first blush iWeb seems to win here. But what I soon realized is RW allows you to mix regular text and pictures together with html snippets right in the same text box. This makes adding counters or badges easy. Plus you can use HTML formatting for things like Titles occurring through your page. Instead of increasing the font size, making the text bold and changing its color, you can simply say this is Heading style 2 or 5 and this happens automatically per the predefined style. Better yet if you change a style everything on that one page or the entire site (your choice) inherits that change. So by working in a non-WYSIWYG mode you gain some long term. advantages over how iWeb works. The same is true with positioning. In iWeb it is fast and easy to place things on a page right down to the pixel. RW just doesn't give you that type of precision and next to splitting my site, layout was my biggest frustration with RW. At least to start. But there is a good reason for this "lack of precision" that may not be apparent until you view the site in a browser. When iWeb came out, you really didn't zoom your browser. iWeb uses Absolute Positioning where it uses anchored boxes for everything, whereas RW uses Relative Positioning. Objects with anchored text or picture boxes like iWeb start having problems if you zoom in or out more than one step. Text starts over flowing other text because the text boxes are anchored by one point. Pages just start looking scary if you try to zoom in or out too much. RW is looking at items relative positions and their relationships with one another. So initially you aren't placing the objects in the same way, it is more like eyeballing things in a way. But when viewed in a web browser you can zoom in or out to your heart's content. So what seems at first like a big disadvantage at first for RW, is actually a HUGE advantage.
This is why you need to go with the flow and try to embrace the new way of working. I mentioned earlier that I wasn't able to find a page type that was equivalent to the iWeb album page. I was able to use a very flexible plug-in for RW called stacks, which allows you to create various single and multi-column or multi-row layouts using empty stacks. You then populate the empty stacks with content, pictures text etc. These pages were not like iWeb albums where you nest the Photo Album Pages in the Album page and they create a skimmable preview and an automatic link to the album. Once I actually started making these new "Album" Pages in RW I realized I was gaining as much or more than I was loosing. The skimmable preview pictures was eyecandy I could live without. Nice touch, not essential. I never liked the way the preview picture shown on the Album page was the first photo in the Photo album. You couldn't change this. Now that I am placing my own photo on the Album page, I could use any picture and make it any size I wanted too. In iWeb the Album Caption was the name of the Photo Page. If this name was too long the caption didn't go to a second line, it got cut off. Any link in RW can have a description added to the link which is what you see in the yellow box when you hover your mouse over the item being linked. I used to hide text boxes links under the pictures on the Albums page for SEO and navigation help. So yes now I have to manually link the Album picture to the Photo Page, but I am no longer creating a hidden text box with a link that I have to remember to move when I add pages to the album. So once again my first impression was wrong. Advantage RW.
Another advantage to RW is any page type can have a sidebar. You can easily add favicons and site logos. You can easily add metadata to any page and customized the names of the path to your pages. The Themes can be more powerful and customizable too. About one week into the process I was begining to really go with the flow and see this new way of working had far more advantages for me than disadvantages.
By the time I finished my new RW site, my iWeb site was looking tired and dated. My biggest and most pleasant surprises were saved until the end. Any kind of SEO was a PITA with iWeb. You had to embed snippets on each page with a code from HaloScan or Google Analytics. Problem was, iWeb erased any such HTML code while you were uploading. So you then had to use a regular expression in the text box ("HaloScan goes here"), upload your site and replace the regular expression with the actual code using a 3rd party tool. Oh and don't do that on any blog page where you are using the built in Apple commenting system because the comments will disappear. I also had problems where the new comment badge would not show up for weeks or months after a comment was made. It was getting so the things I had to do AFTER I uploaded my site to MobileMe were taking longer than uploading the site. Once the site was recreated, it was time to add blog comments, a guestbook, a contact form, Google Analytics, and publish a site map. In my iWeb-influenced mind, I was saving the fussy PITA things for last. I was dead wrong. Unlike what you go through with iWeb, it couldn't have been been easier in RW:
-Blog Comments: Set up an account with the provider. Then I had to go into the page setup in RW for my blog page and click on a popup menu of comment providers & select Discus. If your provider isn't listed you paste some HTML code from the provider into a dialogue box provided by RW for the blog page. In my case it was simpler, just set Discus in the popup menu. Now instead of the iWeb badge showing me new posts (and only when it was in the mood), I now get an email.
-Google Analytics: Set up an account with Google. Go to the Stats area in the RW side bar, click on Configure, paste in your code from Google and you are good to go. You can monitor your Google analytics stats right from within RapidWeaver. (Also works this way for GoSquared Live Stats).
-Guestbook: Same as iWeb. You add a page with an HTML snippet from your Guestbook provider in an iFrame.
-Contact Form: This is a RW page type which masks your email address from the spambots by transferring the information to an invisible and inaccessible page within your site. This page then emails you the information.
-Full Site Search: This doesn't exist in iWeb. You can search your blogs right now, but this is one of the features you lose when MobileMe shuts down. By adding an inexpensive Plug in called RapidSearch Pro I enable full site search. You set up a MySQL server for your site. Host Excellence walked me through the 4-Step Process via a well written Help File. You then control what pages are indexed via your sitemap.xml file. You let RapidSearch Pro index your site and you are good to go.
-SiteMap: There is a simple SiteMap generation feature built into RW 5. There are third party tools for doing this for iWeb. I purchased an inexpensive RW plug in called SiteMap plus that not only generates the sitemap.xml file, it allows you to customize what pages get searched and at what frequency. This ties into what is searched via RapidSearch Pro. This plug-in also generates a visible and customizable sitemap page to help your site's users find their way around. Another bonus of being hosted off Mobile Me is when I went to add my sites to my Google account they had already been indexed. It seemed like they never crawled MobileMe unless you told them you wanted them to look at your site.
Link Checking: This doesn't exist in iWeb. I bought another inexpensive plug-in called Link Inspector for RW. It checks all of your internal and external links and generates a report showing the status of all links. This was just what the doctor ordered for my large site. I will run it periodically to make sure external links are still working and that I haven't broken any internal links.
My site was pretty much wrapped up on Monday August 8th. I just had to add in Blog Comments, Google Analytics, the Guestbook, Full Site Search and the Site Map. I figured I would go public on Tuesday or Wednesday. To my great pleasure these 5 items took all of 2 hours to get set up and working. This was a nice touch after 2 months of hard work.
So there you have it. This is the process I went through converting my site over to RapidWeaver. Your mileage may vary. I am not pushing RapidWeaver for everyone. You have to find what program is the right fit for you. You may find staying with iWeb on a new host is the right fit for you. You need to decide if you can live with the features you lose once you aren't hosted on Mobile Me. For me there was great pain, but in the end there was a lot of gain too. I do like my new site and I feel it will serve me well for years to come. Good luck to all of you in whatever path you choose. Lastly thanks one last time to the helpful folks around here
Jim
http://grillinsmokin.net
Message was edited by: Jim Mahoney

Thanks Roddy. I agree with your take on some of the other software you mentioned, at least from the perspective of having dabbled with demo versions of some of the others. I will add that with Sandvox I felt a little nervous about it. Kind of almost like the software was a "hobby" effort a la the first gen Apple TV.
I also agree with some of your points regarding RapidWeaver. But now that I've built my rather large (for a hobbyist site) website with it I will have to respectfully disagree about it being at the same level as iWeb, or as you put it: a sideways move. While iWeb can be made to do things it was never originally meant to do, there are many places it simply can't go that RapidWeaver can. I was often hitting the limits of what you could do in iWeb, whereas with RapidWeaver, with one exception, I didn't feel like I was running up against any limits yet. The exception is it's lack of ability to handle large sites well. That was almost the deal breaker for me. I find it unexplainable that a software package with all kinds of add-ons helping you make more ambitious sites, can't handle those same sites in a single file. This was almost a deal-breaker for me. For folks who have small to medium sized iWeb sites this isn't a concern. There are also ways to warehouse images on the server to keep file size down, but this gets more complex than many folks coming from iWeb would want to do. Me splitting my site up the way I did was more work than I wanted to do.I almost bagged the whole thing and was close to just taking the old site down.
Now if we were to fantasize for a minute I can think of a way where I could also say iWeb to RapiWeaver is a sideways move: While I don't think iWeb '09 is the equal to RapidWeaver 5, I'd bet that iWeb 11 or the oft rumored iWeb Pro might have been. I kept hoping that Apple would keep pushing the limits of what iWeb could do and add in some missing features and head down the HTML 5 road.
I will conditionally agree on your saying that the shopping list for RapidWeaver can be substantial. I will qualify that by saying: Depending on what you are doing with it, your shopping list for RapidWeaver can be substantial. With one exception, I do think the base package of RapidWeaver is fairly priced. I think the basic Stacks functionality and a few basic stacks should be part of RapidWeaver. The more esoteric stacks can be pay as you go. When iLife 11 was announced without a an update to iWeb, I did some preliminary pricing and I was rather discouraged at the total. This spring I got more serious about things and repriced RapidWeaver and add-ons. After trying out various themes and plug-ins, I was able to sharpen my pencil and reduce the cost of entry considerably. One of the things that helped is the theme I bought had a couple features built into it. It had a nice lightbox type slideshow for photo pages and animated banners/headers capabilities built in. This saved me the expense of several additional plug-ins. Also while I have a blog, I don't consider myself a blogger. I was able to use the built in blog page and I don't feel limited by it at all. Some of the other ad-ons I bought: such as the link checker, site wide search and a more sophisticated sitemap generator were items I added because I could tell I would want to keep the site going long term. Those 3 plug-ins did that a a low price. I didn't think they needed to be built in.
But everyone's mileage may vary. RapidWeaver or any other web design program isn't right for every iWeb user. It all depends on personal needs, abilities and budgets. I'm just glad I can get back to posting to the site and not recreating it.
Jim

Download .jpg image from Network Analyzer 8722es to PC

I Have an Agilent 8722ES network Analyzer and I need to get the image, to save it with the test report.
I can get the data and put in in a graphic but I prefer to put the real image as the Network Analyzer diplay, inlcuding the Markers, real frequency, colors, settings, etc.
the Network Analyzer is capable to save the image as .jpg using the integrated 3.5' disk drive, but I need to save in real time the result and the picture.
Do any body has an aplication than can help me with this? I tried to find something over net and in the Programming manual , but I can't find any.
Thank you for your help guys...

Imontoya
I took a look at the manual for the 8722ES and as you stated the only way to get a jpeg file is to save it to floppy.
From here I can see two options
1. Call Agilent support and see if there is a VISA command to save the image. If there is a VISA command we can call it from LabVIEW.
2. Use the Instrument Driver to import the raw data and create your own display in LabVIEW that looks like you want. You can then you can take a screenshot and do whatever you want with it.

RV016 Router Allow All Traffic For Outside IP

Hi,
I need to configure the firewall to allow all traffice for an IP address of a sever. What steps in the router do i need to configure this? This is a cloud based voip server and we have IP phones and we need to add an IP address of the phone server to allow all traffic for that IP.
thanks.

Hi Jonathan,
I have a similar problem with VOIP traffic being dropped by my new RV016 v3 router.
I have created one Firewall Rule, to allow ALL traffic from the external VOIP PBX provider (single IP) to connect to the internal VOIP phones, which have assigned addresses in a small IP Address range (eg. 10.1.2.50 - 10.1.2.59)
The Aastra VOIP phones continually loose their registration wtih the cloud-based PBX. If you make an outgoing call, it will work, but the PBX will lose connection with the phone, 3 or 4 minutes after you hang up, and will mark it as offline. Incoming calls made within the 3 or 4 minutes will get through, but after that they go right to voicemail on the PBX system.
We used to have an RV016 v2 router and VOIP traffic worked OK, with a similar Firewall Rule. We replaced the v2 router because its CPU crashed.
I tested the VOIP traffic with a WRT160 router with minimal Firewall Rules, and it works OK, as long as SIP-ALG is turned Off. We want to use the RV016 because it provides a larger number of ports for our LAN.
Any suggestions ?
Kirk

All of our iOS devices are displaying the message that they can't connect to the Internet. All show good wifi connections. Our Macs all connect to the internet just fine suggesting that the network is good. I'm stumped.

Airport Utility on the Macs show good internet signals but on our two iPads and my iPhone 5 there are no indications of internet connectivity. One of the iPads is running iOS 7 but the other is still running iOS 6. The iPhone 5 is updated to iOS 7.
Is there a setting switch that if set incorrectly would create this problem? Like I said before, all the iOS devices stopped internet connectivity at the same time.
Update: Well while I was typing this I was called away to help get people to bed etc. And when I got back I tried all four iOS devices and, now, they all connect to the internet. I don't understand it. Two iPhones, different iOS versions, and two iPads, different generations and also different iOS versions, all decided that they would disconnect themselves from the internet but stay connected to the wifi network. Somebody must have an explanation for what just happened. Remember it isn't the router because the Macs all had uninterrupted internet connections. Weird!

I used to have a satellite connection to the internet. When ever the power went off I was told to turn on the devices in a specific order for them to work properly.
Try shutting off every device including all iPads, iPhones, computer, Wi-Fi router and Satellite modem. Then turn them on one at a time in the order listed below. Be sure to wait until each device completes its start up routine before starting up the next item. When my satellite modem was restarted it often had to download an update. The time this took varied with the update. So be sure the Satellite modem is up and connected to the Satellite before going to the next device.
1. Satellite Modem.
2. Wi-Fi Router
3. Your computer. Check to see that your computer connects to the internet.
4. iPad or iPhone and remaining devices one at a time.

How do I interface a computer to the HP8753D Network Analyzer (NA) via a GPIB cable using Labview?

Hi,
I am a new beginner to LabVIEW. Right now, I am trying to acquire data from the HP8753D Vector Network Analyzer (VNA). However, I don't think I even managed to get past the first step.
I tried to create a simple VI with only a single READ GPIB and a WRITE GPIB both to the address 16 (default for HP8753D) with the command IDN?;. I output the result from the READ GPIB to the a string indicator but the front panel displayed boxes and unrecgonized characters.
The NA didn't even showed that it was communicating to the computer at all (No LED lit up).
I have also varied the byte size from 200 to 2000 but I still did not get the res
ult.
I really need help on how to interface the VNA and my computer together. I have a strong feeling that the VI I constructed is too simplified (attachment below). If you know the solution, please help. I really would like to get past this first stage of first getting the computer and the device to communicate first.
Thank you.
Attachments:
LabVIEW_VI.gif ‏4 KB

Hello,
There are several things to check. First make sure that you are using the correct GPIB or VISA resource name. If you are using GPIB the name that you use should be something similar to:
GPIB0::2::INSTR where 2 is the primary address and 0 is the device number.
Then you need also to check which commands are accepted by your device. It is a good idea to start in MAX (Measurement and Automation Explorer) by right clicking in the device.
Another thing you might want to try is to download the driver the instrument driver for this HP8753D that you have.
You can find it in the following address:
hp8753D Instrument Driver
H
ope this helps
Ricardo S.
National Instruments
Message Edited by Support on 12-08-2006 01:36 PM

View spanning tree configuraton for all the switches in ciscoworks

Hi All,
Is there any way I can see spanning tree configuration for all the switches we have on our networks in Ciscoworks.
Waiting for your kind reply.
Thanks in advance
samir

This can be done from within Campus Manager's Topology Services. Open up the LAN Edge View map, and you should seesome switch clouds on the map. If you drill into one of the clouds, you should see a Spanning Tree option in the right-hand tree. If you expand this, you can visualize the spanning tree for MISTP or even for each VLAN.

AX guest network using vlan in the switch

Hi!
I'm thinking of setting up a wlan and guest wlan by setting up separate Airport Expresses on different VLANs. The new gen. The setup would be 3 AXs on the internal network and 3 AXs as guest network. VLAN1 is internal and VLAN2 is guest. All AXs wil lbe set up in brigde mode. The AXs aren't VLAN aware so they'll just pass along whatever packets coming their way, right? I will configure the switch to use VLAN1 on all ports except 4 on VLAN2. 3 for the AXs and one to hte firewall that also provides DHCP for VLAN2.
Would this work OR have i missed something vital here?
/Hasse

Thanks for the info, Unfortunately, as suspected the Arris model that you have is known as a "gateway", or "modem/router".
The AirPort Extreme recognizes that there is another router "upstream" on the network, so it correctly chooses the Bride Mode setting to allow correct operation on the network.
The downside to this is that the Guest Network cannot be enabled when the AirPort is configured in Bridge Mode.
If the Guest Network feature is important to you, check with your service provider to see if they can supply a simple modem to connect to the AirPort Extreme.....not a "gateway" or "modem/router" device.

Cisco DCNM 6.2 does not support most of the switches in my network

Hi All,
I have just installed Cisco DCNM 6.2. I have run a discovery using SNMP v1 my core switch which is a 3750G stack. DCNM discovers all my switches but does not support the 2960 and 3750 switches. The only switches I can select to manage and are supported are a 4510 and 3550. I have also run another discovery using SNMPv3 on a different core switch (Nexus 3K) at one of our remote sites. DCNM found all the other 2960s in that network but I can only select the two Nexus switches in the core to manage. What do I need to do to be able to manage all my switches switch?
Thank you in advance.

Hello,
DCNM is meant for data centre network management and as such only supports the MDS, Nexus and the 6500 series switches, see the RN under supported Cisco platforms and software:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/datacenter/sw/6_x/dcnm/release/notes/dcnm_6_2_5a_relnotes.html#pgfId-314209
For the discovery issue DCNM should 'see' the other devices so you need to have a look at your SNMP and CDP (used for neighbour discovery on a per hop basis) settings on each of the devices.
For an software package to manage LAN/WAN environments you really need to be looking at Cisco Prime LMS.
We are going through the same problem, it would be nice to be able to manage the DC and LAN from DCNM.
Regards
Daniel Hunter

How can i use an existing vpn connection without using the option "Send all traffic over vpn connection"?

I have been trying to get my computer (os x.7) to astablish a remote desktop connection to my work computer via a vpn tunnel. In fact I have just discovered that it works fine if i select to "send all traffic over vpn connection" from the options in the advanced setup of the vpn.
If the option is selected microsofts "Remote desktop connection for mac" works just fine. However without selecting the option it is not taking advantage of the tunnel but tries to connect as if the tunnel would not exist.
Now the question is how do I get program to use the vpn tunnel without checking the above option?
Thanks for any hints and pointers.

Then can her computer be authorized to both accounts?
Absolutely. You can authorize any given computer to up to five iTunes Store accounts.
If purchases are made on her account, to a computer authorized to my account, can I put those songs on my iPod?
If you connect your iPod to her computer, yes. Tracks download only to the computer from which they're purchased, regardless of which iTunes Store account is used for the purchase. Or you could copy the tracks from her computer to yours and then authorize your computer to her iTunes Store account. But that's sort of defeating the original purpose, it would seem to me.
is it better to buy music through Amazon downloads and/or actually purchasing CDs to avoid the security features iTunes puts on its music?
That's certainly an option. If it's an entire album I want, I buy CDs. That way I can import them at the quality I want and to whichever of my systems I want. Amazon or one of the other download stores that offer tracks as MP3 are also an option, though for me download stores are best when you just want a couple of tracks off a given CD.

Network analyzer sees all traffic on the switch

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for