New Syetem(Highest FSB) post ur result

Hi folks
This my first time posting here
Well i have finally go ahead with the AMD64 bits wagon and i have a few question need answer if u folks dont mind helping out here. SEE SIG for SPECS
1:  I know my board haven got  PCI/AGI lock, what is a safe max FSB should i raise till one of my other part gose fubar?
2: What is a better way to overclock on this board, raise FSB or throught the Dynamic setting?
3:  Where do i look or where to tell what version my bios is, have use CPU-Z but it tell me it VERSION 7.00T and DATE 04/02/01 hope this not made in 2001?
4: Also dose it matter if the ram timming tighter the better on AMD64( I know is dose on the XPs), i have 2x512 cosair 3200LL 1.1 ready to put in if i need it but dunno if this works with this sytem as i have read the sticky above saying incapatability.
ATM i have my system running at 220x10=2.2 fully stable (prime for over 4hrs)not one problem so far with the Nanya ram at
220 fsb
FSB:DRAM CPU/10  (what is better to set in bios??)
CAS#Latency: 3
RAS#to CAS# Delay: 3
RAS#%: 3
Cycle Time(Tras): 8
Bank Cycle Time (Trc): 11
Dram Idle Timer: 16
Please do tell me what to improve in the setting wise.
Thank you for reading and helps in advance

Actually we saw very little change in the Via Board with the timings. The only one that made a ton of difference was the CAS Latency. The A64's love low latency and the rest is not doing much. You too can test this by making changes and testing with SiSoft Sandra's memory bandwidth test. In fact we found that the RAM ran basically as fast with both DDR333 and DDR40o settings. However if the timings get too tight you will find things don't work at all anymore. So my advice is to get good low latency RAM and relax those timings and let her breath a bit.

Similar Messages

  • Urgent : Posting Payroll results from legacy system to SAP Fi /C0

    Hi Experts,
                A client requirment is such that they have to post payroll results to FI/Co
                They are not using SAP HR- Payroll module . They use their own payroll 
                 processing system . 
                 Please tell what would be the best way of doing so 
                  Help is urgently required
    Nidhi

    To be more specific, Pavani is referring to create a new inbound - custom program, which can create IDOCs in SAP system and transfer the data to FI - CO module.
    If your client has all the infrastructure for a new interface development, like XI system or IBM - Mercator system, Out bound interface for Third party payroll system, Interface - ABAP team, then it could be planned to develop the SAP inbound interface.
    Hope this helps.
    Narasimha

  • Error while posting payroll results to FI -IN PY

    Dear Consultants,
    When I am posting Payroll results to FI I am able to see the + amount and - amount is equal still it giving error and when I check PCP0 it says incorrect document generated. Please do needful.
    Error message: Error in document: HRPAY 0000000094 DEVCLNT200
    Error in document: HRPAY 0000000094 DEVCLNT200
    Message no. RW609
    Diagnosis
    Errors occurred when checking or posting the document
    Reference type = HRPAY
    Reference key = 0000000094
    Logical system = DEVCLNT200
    You can find the errors in the log.
    System Response
    The document cannot be posted.
    Procedure
    Remove the error in the document and create and post the document again.
    Second error message : Posting period 012 2012 is not open
    Message Text
    Posting period 012 2012 is not open
    Technical Data
    Message type__________
    E (Error)
    Message class_________
    F5 (Document Editing)
    Message number________
    201
    Message variable 1____
    012
    Message variable 2____
    2012
    Message variable 3____
    +
    Message variable 4____
    COSM
    Message Attributes
    Level of detail_______
    2 (Level of detail 2)
    Problem class_________
    Sort criterion________
    Number________________
      1
    Environment Information
    Item__________________
    000
    Please do needful, why this error is coming even though the +and - amount are equal.
    Regards,
    Naresh.KM

    Dear Siva,
    Sorry for delay in reply, as per my understanding I have done the assignment correctly, and the same arrears are coming in RT table as well as in payslip. When I checked the report RPDKON00 I have got a list of wage types assigned to GL account under Country grouping 40,
    A.Define wage type posting characteristics : I have copied arrears, carryforward wage types from their original wage types.
    Example : From Basic pay (which is using in infotype 0008)  I have copied Basic arrear wage type and basic carryforward wage type. and assigned the same in ZN42, ZN43, ZN44 and did the assignment.
    B. Define symbolic account : I have copied the symbolic account which is assigned to Basic wage type and copied the same and created new symbolic account and assigned to only basic arrear wage type which is coming in RT table.
    C .Assigned wage type to symbolic account : I have not assigned arrear wage type symbolic account to Original wge type in V_T53EL. Only Basic wage type symbolic account is mapped here.
    D Mapping symbolic account to G/L account : I have assigned the arrear wage type Symbolic account to the same GL which is assigned to original Basic wage type symbolic account.
    I have followed the same process for all the arrear wage types, and even the report RPDKON00 it is showing the same there is no error message.
    Apart from that I have created a New Symbolic account for /ZF5 and did all assignment, and assigned /ZF5 wage type symbolic account to /3F1 wage type symbolic account and GL mapping also same as /3F1.
    In Standard /552 arrear process there is no /ZF5 postings it will directly deduct the amount.
    Please suggest do I need to check any other area or how can I solve this error. kindly do needful.
    Regards,
    Naresh.KM 

  • Linux vs. linux-ck power usage - laptop users please post your results

    Krum reported are rather significant increase in power consumption when using the linux-ck kernel vs. the linux (stock ARCH) kernel.
    krum wrote:With the last ck i7-avx, I jump from 10W (stock arch) to 15W on my laptop with the same kernel options and same usage.
    I will investigate further another time...
    I began to wonder just how universal this was so I tested on my own laptop (Intel T9400 @ 2.53 GHz, NVidia FX, 2x2 GB, SSD and 17" screen) booted into three different kernels, ARCH, ck-generic, and ck-core2 with the latter two downloaded from my unofficial repo.  I took two readings per kernel.  The first was measured with powertop on battery after letting it settle for a good 3 min of idle.  The second was with the battery removed and on AC power measured with a Kill-A-Watt.  My results indicate no significant differences.
    linux-3.0.3-1
    Powertop: 37.5
    Kitt-A-Watt: 41
    linux-ck-3.0.3-4
    Powertop: 38.6
    Kitt-A-Watt: 41
    linux-ck-core2-3.0.3-4
    Powertop: 37.5
    Kitt-A-Watt: 40
    Can others running both kernels do a similar analysis with powertop and post the results here?

    Hi,
    I did my test with powertop.
    I got also higher temp:
    [root@akira david]# uname -a && uptime && fan
    Linux akira 3.0-ck #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun Aug 21 05:31:12 EDT 2011 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2620M CPU @ 2.70GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
    22:20:24 up 10:26,  4 users,  load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.07
    speed:        2616
    level:        auto
    Core 0:         +47.0°C 
    Core 1:         +42.0°C
    [root@akira david]# uname -a && uptime && fan
    Linux akira 3.0-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Aug 17 21:55:57 CEST 2011 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2620M CPU @ 2.70GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
    22:22:52 up 2 min,  4 users,  load average: 0.28, 0.19, 0.08
    speed:        2630
    level:        auto
    Core 0:         +39.0°C 
    Core 1:         +38.0°C
    EDIT:
    [root@akira david]# uname -a && uptime && fan
    Linux akira 3.0-ck #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun Aug 21 05:31:12 EDT 2011 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2620M CPU @ 2.70GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
    22:29:41 up 2 min,  4 users,  load average: 0.18, 0.24, 0.10
    speed:        2644
    level:        auto
    Core 0:         +40.0°C 
    Core 1:         +35.0°C
    My bad, I forget to had these kernel boot option: pcie_aspm=force i915.i915_enable_rc6=1 i915.i915_enable_fbc=1 i915.lvds_downclock=1
    So it seems to be OK, I will do new powertop test when my battery will be full.
    Last edited by krum (2011-08-28 21:11:47)

  • Help Required : Adding new Wagetype to IT 0402 Payroll Results

    Dear Experts,
    I am adding a new Wagetype to show in Payroll results. At the step of setting up payroll infotypes a workbench request is created. When I transport this request from my Development server to Quality server I get the following error
       "Table CI_P0402 could not be activated"
    Can anyone please guide me regarding this issue.
    Regards,
    Talha Aftab

    For anyone else facing the same issue : You have to make sure the data elements part of CI_P0402, like ZZTELXXXXX are transported as well. They were not automatically part of my transport, which is why it worked fine on my DEV server, but couldn't be activated when I transported to QAS (The data elements are created for each new wagetype when they are added to 0402, and it is set up)
    Regards,
    Talha Aftab

  • Posting payroll results to FI : error F5 808

    Hi all,
    While posting payroll results to FI, we have the following error
    F5 808 Field Assign. is a required field for G/L account XXXX 1111111111
    XXXX is the company code
    1111111111 is the account number
    The field "Assignement" is set to required in table T004V(field status variants) in FI customizing and they can't change it to optional.
    is there a standard way to correct this? should we implement an exit user (definition SMOD_PCPO0001)?
    Thanks
    Karim

    Check the Posting Keys and Field Status Group through tcode OB41 and also check the below thread ...
    [where can i fill the "assign." when posting payroll to GL error f5808;
    Mohan

  • Error while posting payroll results to FI  - Documents not getting created

    Hi all,
    While posting payroll results to FI for Dec 2011 a failure of our Production Server resulted in erroneous posting of payroll
    results. Posting run no: 1756 did not get posted at all though the run
    status shown was "document posted". The issue was resolved by resorting
    to manual posting of entries.
    Now we are unable to post payroll results for Jan 2012 for the same
    range of employee numbers for whom the manual posting was made for Dec
    2011. No posting documents are getting created.
    Kindly suggest how to resolve the issue.
    Regards,
    Sunil

    Hi All,
        I raised an OSS for the issue. SAP Support provided a solution for the problem. The solution involved cancelling a reversal which we had tried and failed followed by re posting the run no 1756. Our manual entries had to be reversed.The solution is given below.
        Please follow these steps:
    - Select the posting run 1756
    - Menu => Edit => Reversal => Reset after termination
    - After last step the status of the posting run should appear as
    'documents posted'
    - Go to transaction SM13
    - Select by user 8273 and date 02.01.2012
    - You should see an entry like this:
    400 8273 02.01.2012 15:26:57 @07\QEnqueues released@ Error
    - Select the entry and press the button 'Single test'
    - In case the system shows an error, please send the message back to us
    - In case the system shows no errors => press button 'Repeat update'
    - Then check in PCP0 and FI is the document has been correctly posted.
    Regards
    Sunil

  • I get this message on my Facebook news feed when someone posts a YouTube video. Don't know why. It's worked fine for years. I am using Safari on my iPad. If I use the Facebook app it works fine. Any thoughts. Thanks,    Access Denied   You don't have

    I get this message on my Facebook news feed when someone posts a YouTube video. Don't know why. It's worked fine for years. I am using Safari on my iPad. If I use the Facebook app it works fine. Any thoughts.
    Thanks,
    Walid
    Access Denied
    You don't have permission to access "http://fbexternal-a.akamaihd.net/embed/?" on this server.
    Reference #18.3555facd.1362007289.6945153f

    Same thing on mine, it just started happening last weekend.

  • Trying to add the new year 2012 to posting periods

    I am trying to add the new 2012 months in posting periods in order to allow us to post some invoices that have terms due in 2012. First, when I go to add a new period the "category" feild is missing. Im guessing this has to be added somewhere else but I am not sure. Second, When I go to add the actual month for January 2012, I get the error "Enter Valid code [Posting Period -Period Code], '-' [Message 173-36]. Not really sure why I cant add this but I am guessing there is a step before I am missing. Any suggestions please...thank you!

    I figured out how to add it, I was adding the month as 2012-01, yet I only had to put 2012 and it would pre-fill in the dates then. Thanks anyways!

  • Var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest(); xhr.open("POST", url,false); working in chrome but not in mozilla 5.0 i am get error "[Exception... " no message " nsresult"

    while uploading a file i am getting below error
    [Exception... "<no message>" nsresult: "0x805e0006 (<unknown>)" location: "JS frame :<TOP_LEVEL> :: line 80" data: no]
    but the same works in chrome
    here is the java script code
    var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();
    xhr.open("POST", url,false);

    HI johibkhan.
    I think you have to update Firefox the call you are using needs 12 or higher:
    "Gecko 12.0 (Firefox 12.0 / Thunderbird 12.0 / SeaMonkey 2.9) and later support using XMLHttpRequest to read from data: URLs."
    [https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/XMLHttpRequest]
    But also keep in mind we have developers dedicated to answering questions like this in the Firefox section of stackoverflow.com as well :-) You might get a faster/more accurate response.

  • Urgent :Posting Payroll results from Legacy system to FI/co

    Hi Experts,
    A client requirment is such that they have to post payroll results to FI/Co
    They are not using SAP HR- Payroll module . They use their own payroll
    processing system .
    Please tell what would be the best way of doing so
    Help is urgently required
    Nidhi

    hai nidhi,
    Inform ABAP team to develop the programme for payroll results,and post the entry to FI through T.code F-02.
    govind.

  • Must I have new domain operational to post initial pages?

    Hello,
    I'm trying to determine why changes I've made to my Codify Design template #2 are not showing up in the new page I've posted in a folder at my website.  It's been a year since I've done my first DW website.  Since then, maintaining has been easy, but now that I'm starting another one, I seem to be back at square one as I've forgotten some essentials.
    I've followed instructions on the design Discussion page regarding making changes to the header -- changing "our new Company" to our own organization's name. I've saved that file and uploaded everything so far to the server, but those changes do not show up on the new index page.
    Do I remember that I actually have to have a domain name operational before this will work?  Shouldn't I be able to do a "live view" of these pages locally and see the change I've made?
    I also seem to remember that not everything from the template file needs to be uploaded (but I have uploaded everything).  I wanted to watch the video tutorial about doing this, but it has been stalling after 5-10 seconds.  Any other recommendations for tutorials or step by step instructions would be appreciated.
    Thanks!
    Pamela

    Hi Murray
    I'd say you all are going above and beyond already. Thanks so much for helping!
    You wrote:
    "If you still get the old text, then either
    a) you haven't uploaded the  image file, or
    b) you haven't uploaded it to the correct location, or
    c)  you are looking at a cached copy of the image, not the one that's  actually on the web.  I don't think there are any other possibilities"
    Of these three, I think only b) is a possibility.  I have uploaded it to the web folder correctly, but I'm concerned that the file structure I've created is not quite what it should be.  So, to that end, I've gone back to the one I set up a year ago (with help), which works well, and have tried to re-create that structure.
    i.e., For everything that was in the main directory on the year- old site, I put (corresponding files) into a main directory in the new site.  Everything that was not in the main directory I moved into a separate folder and out of the way.
    I do remember than when working on this with Elizabeth Marshall last year, she had me save one of my files with a new name.  I THINK it was this one:  "... theme.dwt,"  which was placed in the template file folder.  This is something I haven't done . . . I don't remember how I created this file to begin with!  Somehow I managed to get my own banner design into this template, but only aftersome trial and error.
    I think if I can get some answers about 1. in what format to save the .psd file with text changes (and where to put it), 2. how changes to the .dwt file occur, I'd be somewhat on the right track?
    Pamela

  • New Pantone Color Calibrator posted

    New version 1.1 posted for W520.
    W520, i7-2820QM, BIOS 1.42, 1920x1080 FHD, 32 GB RAM, 2000M NVIDIA GPU, Samsung 850 Pro 1TB SSD, Crucial M550 mSata 512GB, WD 2TB USB 3.0, eSata Plextor PX-LB950UE BluRay
    W520, i7-2760QM, BIOS 1.42 1920x1080 FHD, 32 GB RAM, 1000M NVIDIA GPU, Crucial M500 480GB mSata SSD, Hitachi 500GB HDD, WD 2TB USB 3.0
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    I agree that using the native white point of the display with the built-in color sensor and Pantone software is a lot closer to correct than using 6500K, but then you don't even know what white point it's actually calibrated to. This matters quite a bit if you're doing color-critical graphics/photography work.
    The most obvious difference of the profile I posted is a lessening of the blue channel, but the entire display gamut has been corrected for color accuracy, gamma, and luminance. You need to be working in a color-managed application to really get the full benefit of this though (eg Photoshop or Lightroom).

  • New core centre please post findings

    please post construtive comments re the new version
    rants are not constructive and will be removed

    As long as I don't set to auto, it seems to function just fine.
    Setting to auto causes the FSB to begin increasing  and doesn't stop until the machine crashes . Requires a cold boot (or two) to get functional again.
    Temperature readings seem erratic.
    The interface though attractive is clunky I would prefer a more standard windowed interface. It certainly could include a fancy "skin" to perk things up a bit. The way it is now seems a bit nonintuitive. What is it supposed to be anyway ? Looks like the mottled front end of a Suzuki Hayabusa.
    The sliders are not smooth, it's not easy to settle on a particular increment.
    It would be nice to be able to see the individual settings without having to actually clik on the slider. (This always causes me to change the setting accidentally.) A "mouse over" would be sufficent but I think it would be better to just have it displayed underneath the slider.
    The temperature graph is a good idea but there are no details, it's much to small and IMHO I believe it should be more configurable and include a graph for the fans as well as a log for reviewing later. Also the way it flip flops to put the highest temp at the top is unecessary and annoying.
    The open and closing of the wings seems to be heavily delayed and this type of interface is again IMHO clunky.
    It seems necessary to implement a way to keep one from accidentally changing settings, however hiding the window in such a manner seems odd to me.
    The scrolling "about" dialog is cute but inefficient. I don't want to have to wait for that scroll in order to see my software version. Just give me the info. Leave the scrolling for the movie credits eh ?
    An always on top function would be very useful.
    The "CoreCenter" is a cool idea but the implementation is suffering.
    I would be MUCH happier to see the 875p bios issues resolved, as per a new bios. Than to have a new "CoreCenter" release. Not everyone will agree with my assessment but I bet all the owners of 1.3 and 1.4 bios dead mother boards will.
    Looking forward to seeing future posts in this thread.
    Thanx,
    Jag

  • New 24" iMac - Benchmarks or gaming results?

    Hi,
    Has anyone got any benchmarks on the new 24" iMac?
    I'm particularly interested in gaming results, such as Call Of Duty 2 and 4, Quake 4, Halo and Doom 3 etc?
    I beleive the 24" base model has the nVidia 9400 and i'm curious to see if it runs Call Of Duty 2 as other nVidida cards seem to struggle.
    Thanks.

    Hello Mark,
    I won't post any direct links. Google is your friend...
    iMac Benchmarks
    Is a good search option that will reveal all you could ever wish to know ( about bench marks and iMacs that is! )
    Cheers.
    Ian.

Maybe you are looking for