No customizing request of LBWE gets stored in SE09

Hi All,
I have activated master and transaction data sources in RSA5 and corresponding requests are showing in SE09 but once I activate extract structure using T-code LBWE, It does not ask to save and also no customizing request gets stored in SE09.
could anyone has soltion to this problem.
Regards
Amit Srivastava

Hi All,
I have checked all those things but it didn't help me.
Can you please tell me one thing, if I activated datasouce in LBWE then it should ask for customized request (Correct me if I am write) ?
In my case, I have actiavted all transactional datsouce in RSA5 and its shows in one workbench request in SE09 but while I am trying to activated those datasource from LBWE it's not asking me any customized request.
If assume that it's get stores in workbench request, while transporting this request in production, will it cause me error in production?
Or is there any setting that I am missing?
Regards,
Rishit

Similar Messages

What is Custom Dimentions in FI? How the fields get stored defined under it

Hi All,
I need to add 3 Custom fields in Standard FI screens.
I came to know about Custom Dimentions concept of FI and I added the fields in standard screen. It got reflected to standard Tables also but not in BAPI Structures or IDOCS.
What all I need to know is how do they get stored in standard tables on save of Document.
Does any BAPI or Function module gets called for it..?
Scenario::: These fields will come to SAP ECC from some 3rd Party via Interface.
So, now, in BAPI/ IDOC I'll have to manually handle those fields. Instead I was looking for some BAPI/ FM which handles Custom dimention fields.
Please let me know if problem is not clear.
Regards,
A Tewar.

bogon just disappeared from SHARED on my iMac ... - although mystery remains as it still shows up in MBP ...

Doubt in customizing request with respect to table entries

Hi All,
I have a doubt in customizing request with respect to table entries.
Suppose I have a customizing request with respect to a table that contains say 10 entries in the development system.
Now I am transporting this request to the quality system in which the same table contains 20 entries.
When I am transporting this table from the development system to the quality system, will my 10 entries in the development system get added to the 20 entries in the quality system or will my table get overwritten in the quality system.
What difference will this be if it is a workbench request ? .
Regards,
Sushanth H.S.

Hello,
So if we are transporting contents of a table from one system to another, it should always be a customizing request and not a workbench request right.
If the "Delivery Class" of the table is 'C'(Customizing table, maintenance only by cust., not SAP import) it will ask for a customizing request.
If it is 'A'(Application table (master and transaction data)), it will ask for Workbench.
To add to your previous qn, when you transport the entries to subsequent system it will always check the KEY FIELDS and then update. If you see a transport, then the table entries are represented by their key fields.
If you create new entries in your table and transport, it will add the records. Else it will modify them
Hope i am clear.
BR,
Suhas
Edited by: Suhas Saha on Jan 23, 2009 11:51 AM

Customizing Request Application Flows in OIM 11g?

To all:
I'm trying to work through a scenario using Request Templates - I'm not sure that this approach is possible using configuration approaches and wanted to see if anyone has any useful feedback. First, let me describe the problem I'm attempting to solve:
- The users who will be using self-service will be somewhat restricted on what they can do: basically, once they have an account in OIM (this is 'automatic' from a reconciliation - there's no self-registration or user creation) they can request access to a small number of applications.
The ideal flow that we would like to follow is:
Step 1: Log in to OIM.
Step 2: Create Request
Step 3: Select the Application for requested access and the requested role.
Step 4: Enter an effective date and justification.
Step 5: Submit
... something 'application focused', not 'resource focused' as the end user community is not particularly aware (nor do they really need to be) about the details of how a user is authenticated.
I can get 'close' to this using a request template, with this flow:
Step 1: Log in to OIM
Step 2: Create a request.
Step 3: Select a Request Template. (I named the template after the application - "Select App Account")
Step 4: Select Your Resource (only one in this case - restricted to "AD User")
Step 5: Enter information about the AD account. (I can restrict this down to only allow for group selection, which is great.)
Step 6: Enter effective date, justification
Step 7: Submit
So the only thing I'd really like to 'skip' (or somehow default) is the selection of a resource and skip that step - because the template only allows for a single selection anyway, and having an extra step with a single selection that may only muddle the process would be detrimental to the usability of the request.
Is this a modification that we can make to the request flow ("If only one resource, default and move on") - or will we need to create some form of customized request process using the APIs?
I've dug into the JSF navigation in the iam-console-faces WAR file; it seems that navigation is tied up in the backing beans - has anyone else used Request Templates to meet this type of need?
My thanks in advance for any insight you can provide!

Dewan.Rajiv wrote:
It's a new flow which Oracle has introduced in OIM 11g. You can't skip that selection until you do modification in OOTB UI.
RO is mandatory thing to raise request so you can go for custom UI (Need ADF Knowledge) in which you'll ask end user to select other things except that Resource and you'll fetch RO name from some configuration file for using in request APIs.Thanks - it looks like customizing the OOTB UI might not be possible - rather than using ADF/Faces configuration files, most of the navigation redirects seem to be 'hidden away' in compiled class files. (My original thought: add some kind of filter and/or extension to an ADF Task Flow that governs the request application flow - but there are not task flow files to modify?)

Customizing request table

Hi to all
Please tell me in which table Customizing requests are stored.
So that i can find out which user has generated request with object name.
Regards
Anubhav

Hello Anubhav
If you want to make a detailed tracking of all changes in customizing then you need to create BC-Sets from your customizing requests.
BC-Sets are also the only way to create different "versions" of customizing settings.
Further readings:
[The Business Configuration Set Technology|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/20749c9a-b612-2a10-af89-fed8f4f28876]
[The Customizing Cross-System Viewer|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/63ecc890-0201-0010-99ae-db3841f39146]
Regards
Uwe

Customizing request option is not available in charm

Hi Everybody ,
I have a strange issue.
I created a CR and created a single correction .
I changing the status of single correction to "In development" . At this point system opens a pop up for creating Transport requests with work bench and customizing requests. But for few single corrections i am getting option only for work bench .
In pop up i don't have customizing request radio button.
This issue is happening for only few Single corrections not for all .
Can u please help me on this ?
Thanks in advance ,
vijay

Hi Deepak Srivastava,
You can run the following command to enable the feature.
Set-CsconferencingPolicy –Identity Global –EnableP2PRecording $True
Best regards,
Eric

Customizing request: Table T001L

Hi,
We are currently customizing SAP in two parallell ongoing projects. IN both projects, we must create entries in table T001L (storage locations). But the customizing must be transported at different times.
Our question: When the customizing request is released; will the complete table T001L be included in the transport or ONLY the newly added entries that were added in this request?
Our concern is that we ONLY want to include some of the storage locations in the request not all newly added entries in table T001L,
Have you come across this issue, please advice,
//Eva

SAP automatically creates a transport request for any new added locations.
It is certainly not the entire table that gets transported, like it is for calendars or account assignments.
However you can create at any time a manual transport and only include what you like.
But ..... I recommend to release the transports soon with its compelte entries, this causes less issues than keeping transports for a long time and then releasing it ( after an other one has done customizing later but transported earlier ).
I have seen it many times, especially if you transport entire table and do not release it, that newer entries got overwritten by old customizing.

Customizing request screen not popping up while saving

Hi
I have created a company and saved. but while saving no customizing request screen popped up.
Does any one know the reason behind it and also let me know if any settings to be done to get the customizing request screen pop up.
with regards
Ramesh Y

Hi Eli,
Thanks for quick reqply but when I tried to access the Tcode SCC4 it throws an error as below
Transaction SCC4 is locked (in Transaction SM01) &
when I tried to access the Tcode SM01 it throws an error as below
Transaction SM01 is locked (in Transaction SM01)
is there any way I can check this and activate the same.
Ramesh Y

Unable to create a customizing request to transport BPC10 content to Quality

Hi
Unable to create a customizing request to transport BPC10 content to Quality .
From the transport connections tab, i am selecting the required objects and then clicking the transport truck but it does not pop up and ask for a transport request .
So please provide any solution.

Hi,
Check whether Standard transport switched-on is enabled or not. To get transport request your setting should be as follows : RSA1-->Transport Connection-->Edit-->Transport
Hope it helps...
regards,
Raju

Where it PAB gets stored? How to access it?

Hi All
Through web accesss of sunone mail I can able to create the contacts and groups. But my question is where they get stored and how to access it. They can be accessed through ldap or not? If so what is the uri? Can we see the contacts in netscape console or not? If yes where? Could you post all sorts of information about PAB?

There are several things that can cause problems. Please start with exact version of iMS you're running. Send the output from running
imsimta version
Did your PAB ever work? Has it changed in some way, such as changing the name of the server? Was this an upgrade from an earlier version? Did you attempt to load data manually? Have you customized your webmail interface?

No BED,Cess & HS Cess values are getting stored in export Sales after J1iin

Hi,
This is a problem which is CIN based (Country India) for Export Sales. We configured following thing
Excise Registration      -     1
Excise Group     -     1 lets say it is G1
Series Group     -     2 lets say they are S1 & S2
(S1 Domestic / Export Sale & S2 57 F4)
Sub Transaction Type     -     2 lets Say ES & IP
(ES Export Sale & IP - Import Purchase)
Tax Procedure TAXINN
Maintained Proper Defaults Condition Type
Also maintained all default DLFC and also additionally maintained DLFC with ES - Sub Transaction Type for Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction
Maintained all required GL account per excise Transaction i.e
G1 - DLFC - Co. Code -      - All Required GL
G1 - DLFC - Co. Code - ES - All Required GL
Maintained Default Excise Group & Series Group
S. Org - Dis.Ch. - Div - Sh. Pt - Plant - G1 - S1 - Export Under letter of Undertaking - ES
Pricing Procedure -     Export pricing consist containing PR00, BED, Cess & HS Cess (maintained in both % & total). No account keys and statistical tick maintained except PR00 . So total 7 condition Types. Also proper condition record maintained.
Now for my Domestic sales everything is working fine. Here Both excise tables i.e J_1iexchdr & J_1iexcdtl are getting updated after J1iin for BED, Cess & HS CESS.
But in case of J1IIN of Export sale we are not able to store the values of ED, Cess & SHE Cess. Interesting thing is that these values are appearing initially while creating J1IIn through billing doc no. but as soon as we save it, only excise Invoice no is getting generated but no BED, CESS & HS Cess values are getting updated in tables.
So can anyone is having any clue why this values are not getting stored. I want these values in Excise Invoice for ARE 1 processing.
(We are using local number range for export invoice also)
Early response needed. Thanks

OK, no issues.
I wanted to ask u wether u are posting these excise values..?
and generally excise related condition types do not appear in Export pricing procedure as in export excise in not recoverable from the customer.
Hence even if tehy appear, tehy should eb statistical in teh export pricing procedure.
What you can do is,go to J1ID, Maintain excise indicator for customer.then Under the Excise rates, Choose Excise Tax rate.
here you can maintain, Excise rate(BED %), ECS% and AT1%(higher Ed.Cess) for the chapter id in your material.
similarly for all the chapter i'ds that you wish to make make an export for... (Remember to enter the Valid from and excise indicator)
Now, do teh j1iin again,and choose teh utilzation tab,then click on teh pencil icon and choose "Export Under bond".
If u fail to choose this option, systemw ill not allow you to carete an ARE1 for thsi excise invoice.
Lemme know if this works.
Regard;s
Priyanka M.
Reward points if helpful

Change "Create a request" button in SMPortal (SSP) to point to custom Request Offering (not Generic Incident Request)

Hello MSSCSM community,
is it possible to change the request offering mapping of the "Create a request" button (Image1)? By default it points to "Generic Incident Request" request offering. But this is related to a sealed MP and cannot be edited. So i cannot
change name, image, user prompts etc. I created a new custom request offering "Incident request" and disabled "Generic Incident Request". But now the "Create a request" button throws an error (Image2) because Generic
Incident Request is not available anymore. How to map the button to a custom request offering?
Thanks an regards
Vesp

Thanks a lot for your replies. The blog entry is very interesting for having a diffrent "Request offering" mapped to the button instead of standard "Genereic Incident Request (EN)". But i now figured out a very easy solution for me.. i unpublished and disabled "Genereic
Incident Request (EN)" and then system takes the sealed "Genereic Incident Request" (without (EN)) that cannot be edited. I simply reenabled and published "Genereic Incident Request (EN)" and now i can modify this completely and its mapped to the button
by default. I think system always uses sealed "Genereic Incident Request" as fallback. Only constraint is that i cannot change the MP and Template in Request Offering "Genereic Incident Request (EN)". But template can be edited also.. so its fine for
me. Sorry for this kind of questions, i am new to the MSSCSM topic.
Maybe this will get more flexible in future releases of scsm.
Thanks
Vesp

XI: Alerts - Step by step issue " Prompt for customizing request"

I am going through Michal Krawczyk's blog XI: Alerts - Step by step
Michal Krawczyk and between step 4 and step 5 I run up against an issue. I cannot save it because I get a popup saying "Prompt for customizing request" then I click the list button and it says " You can only include objects of this type in customizing requests only" ( a little redundant I must say ) but anyway - the net result is I can't save and lose all the work I just did.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks - Andrew

Scott,
I have replied in your another thread for this issue. I request you to please make one thread only so that it will not confuse you and the SDNers.
---Satish

Sales order Customer Requested Delivery Date

Hi Experts
We are getting date difference of Customer Requested Delivery Date in MD04 and Product View for one customer.
Scenario:
Created Sales order by giving CRD date as 26.07.2010 and In APO Product View the same sales order shows 25.07.2010.
Please advice.
Thanks
Kanth

Hi Kanth,
Please check your settings under transaction /sapapo/cp3
Also check sap notes 423626, 394113
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

LSMW recording SM30, prompt for customizing request

Hi everyone,
I'm trying to use lsmw for uploading data into a customizing table. For this I recorded the creation of an entry with transaction sm30. At the end of the recording (when saving) the prompt for a customizing request pops up. When executing the resulting batch input, it get's confused (in my opinion because of the transport request popup in the recording).
Is there a way to prevent the popup?
I've read in a different thread that I can create 1 entry, then do the recording for the lsmw in the same session. This sounds good to me, but I don't see how to do this.
If anybody has an idea how to solve this, it would be great.
Regards,
Monika.

Hi
No u can't prevent that popup, because u're trying to update a customing table: you should considere two main things:
- The call of the request popup can depend on the kind of the client, i.e how the client (dev, test or prod) is set;
- If the cleint is closed, so the modifications are not allowed (for example in production system), your lsmw project can't works.
Anyway by SE11 u can try to create a maitenance view table based on the database table u need to update, leave cutomizing flag and generate the maintenance program (for trx SM30) for this new view: probably now it shouldn't show the popup for the transport (but I'n not sure), if it works u can use it in your project.
It's very hard to manage a table control in LSMW, u can't know how many recodrs u need to update and u can't change the bdc program generated for lsmw.
In this situation the best solution is to insert only one record: i.e. for every record u need to update:
- CALL SM30
- Press NEW ENTRY
- Insert the new record to the top of table control
- Save
- exit
In this way your bdc program doesn't depend on the number of records, as you manage only one record, i.e your project will create a bdc session with as many transaction as many records to be inserted.
Max

No customizing request of LBWE gets stored in SE09

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for