No summarization level exists for cycle 261001_KEU5

Dear experts!
Now, I'm getting some issue about performing t.code KEU5.
The first, I create cycle with t.code KEU1 with receive tracing factor rule is Variable portions.
Second, I run the cycle with t.code KEU5 then the system display warring message:
No summarization level exists for cycle 261001
Message no. GA790
Diagnosis
The tracing factors for cycle 261001 cannot be read from a summarization level.
This message is displayed when executing a periodic allocation of overhead costs (assessment, indirect activity allocation) if portions are used as tracing factors in at least one segment. It is designed to make you aware of potential improvement in performance which is not being used.
If variable portions are used as tracing factors, the distribution factors are determined from the object level (table CE3xxxx/CE4xxxx, xxxx=operating concern). If there is a large amount of data at object level, selection can take a long time. The summarization levels can be used to pre-summarize the transaction data, resulting in a drastic reduction in runtimes for periodic allocations.
System Response
The tracing factor is determined from the object level. This does not alter the result of periodic allocation, but the runtime can be lengthy.
Procedure
For large data volumes, define a summarization level in the object level in order to improve performance.
For more information, see the program documentation and the customizing functions, which include a form for defining an appropriate summarization level for periodic allocation.
Help me, please!
Best regards, Huy

Hi
Its just a warning message saying that cycle execution time can be more in the absnce of Summ level
You can create summ levels from ORKE > Tools > Summ Levels
br, Ajay M

Similar Messages

'*' in Summarization Levels for CO-PA

Hi All,
What is the role of table "TKETRLF" in Account based CO-PA. When I try to check the CO-PA Datasource it is giving me an error. I tried to debug it and see where exactly is the problem. I found that the standard program is trying to read the data from the above said table and becoz of not finding the required data it is not picking up the summarisation level and throwing the error.
The table has got all the fields from the summarization levels and a flag(0,1,2...) which says if it is a summarization characteristic/user defined characteristic etc. The fields with out a '*' in KEDV has '0' as the flag. If the program finds the flag as '0' for any of the field in one summarization level then it is ignoring that level.
Since I have atleast one field with out a '*' in each of my summarization levels, it is not picking up the summarization level and throwing an error saying "No Source could be found".
This is very urgent...Please someone help me...
Thanks,
RPk.

Hi,
I have the same problem, and I find SAP Note Note 1069507 - BI Extraction : 'Errors occurred during the extraction'. This is for version 5.0, probably it help you, but in my case I am working in ECC 6.0.
Regards,
Gabriel Barroso.-

Optimal summarization levels for CO-PA

Hi,
is there any guide or SAP Note how to optimal set the summarization levels for CO-PA?
E.g., how many characteristics should a summarization level contain or how many keydata records is maximum for a summarization level?
Thanks in advance
Regards
Peter
Edited by: Peter Jankech on Feb 1, 2010 11:58 PM

Thanks for reply Pradeep,
unfortunatelly I have not found the information I need.
Does anybody know some other source?
The question is: what is the maximum size of an summarization level (in MB)?
Because if we add more and more characteristics to a summarization level, the amount of keytable records rises and the the summatization level losses its purpose.
Within the OSS 83204 (file h83204en.doc) there is a smatement, that a summarization level is considered as big, if its size is more than 20MB...this is nonsense, our summarization levels are bigger than 1GB. Is there any newer version of the manual to the summ.levels?
Thanks
Regards
Peter
Edited by: Peter Jankech on Feb 2, 2010 3:03 PM
Edited by: Peter Jankech on Feb 2, 2010 3:15 PM

WMS cycle count using 'this level' cost for valuation

Hello all,
I have a client on 12.1.3
They have reported that in their system, WMS Cycle count is using 'this level' cost for valuation instead of their stated desired valuation of 'total cost'
Could anyone guide me on perhaps profile values necessary to make this happen for them or pertinent questions to ask as to why this is happening?
My Very Best Regards,
Mallory

Hello,
You can do cycle counting with Rf transaction LM59 for the serialised material.
1.My experience says when you have HUM activated then to track material HU & serialisation profile works together.
2.You can do cycle counting of serailised & non serialsed material through Rf gun but clearance of this material will be issue. You may have to create one more transaction to clear the difference of serialised materials like LI20
Hope this input helps.
Regards,
Prashant

Summarization levels for CO-PC-IS

Hello
So far my production variance report (S_ALR_87013148) has functioned perfectly, but after inserting a new coloum I only get data for only plant.
I posted an OSS message, on which they responed - check note 422543. This note suggests to delete all entries in KKDV... Unfortunately I don't know much about summarization levels - will the needed levels be created automatically when the data collection will be executed again?
Thanks in advance
Best regards
Søren Kirch
LOGSTOR A/S

It is ok to delete the entries.

Building summarization levels for reporting

Hi All,
Our system is very slow to execute COPA reports. I am willing to create summarization levels.
1. I let the system create a proposal
2. I created hiearchy levels
3. I uploaded the levels with data
4. I checked whether reports are reading hierarchy level
I am a little bit confused how this summarization level is intedted to work. I tested the summarization. It works by 1-2 reports, but not for the rest.
So my question is, when a summarization level is applicable for a report?
For examle, if I summarize for customer... and in the report I have characteristics customer... does the system takes this summarization level or not? If in general I need customer in all of our reports as characteristics, I won´t be able to use summarization level for customer?

I am looking somehow for similar answer.
When the system does proposal for sum. levels why the created levels are not used.
For your information. If you have just created new reports and hope to get them speed up it might not work properly.
When you use the proposal of levels the system analysis the ones last used. If some reports are used not often they might not be considered.
So you need to watch and fine tune it.
I noticed that the index which is important to access the level, does not really match our criteria. The sum. level might have the right data but not very good index.
Further you could check the usage of fixed characteristics. For example you copy a simple sum. level with certain data and you add fixed characteristics. Example, company code 01.
But the magical question when it is utilized is also open. Don't forget to activate the usage of sum. levels in the report attributes itself.
BR

Summarization levels in CO-PA extractor

HI Experts :
I am working on creating additional co-pa extractor. I got the requirement like below:
create the extractor for
CoArea 1100 is using summarization level 3
CoArea 1200 is using summarization level 8
CoArea 1660 is using summarization level 10
CoArea 1550 is using summarization level 20
always using the same info provider .
We are creating the additional extractor . So please any one help creating the extractor using these summarization levels .Please provide me some tips or some steps to create the additional extractor ..(Operating concern already exists)
Thanks in advance.
Reddy

Hi reddy,
see this links.....
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/53/c1143c26b8bc00e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/fb07ab90-0201-0010-c489-d527d39cc0c6
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/1910ab90-0201-0010-eea3-c4ac84080806
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/ff61152b-0301-0010-849f-839fec3771f3

'No detailed information exists for this person' while adding new reviewer

Hi All,
This is an extremely urgent issue.
We are getting the following message in SRM while adding a new approver to the Shopping cart once the - 'No detailed information exists for this person'
We have implemented the following OSS Notes in the SRM 5.5 system, Release 700 after rasing a call with SAP.
SAP Pilot OSS note - 1002957
Other OSS Notes -
999528 Adding Ad Hoc Approver fails due to comit erro...
722357 Ad hoc: Commit control with ad hoc enhancement...
990467 Commit Problem with AdHoc Agents...
984582 Problems with Posting Container Data (ad Hoc
 agent...
947296 Inserted/changed approver is not transferred...
910925 SRM Workflow: Ad-hoc agent not found...
803628 BADI workflow: You cannot add an approver
Here are the details
 Cannot add additional approver
 We are now on SRM 5.5 and a document attached shows the
 patch levels
 from SPAM.
 In shop transaction, it is possible to change the
 default approvers,
 but not possible to Add.
 When we add, the system shows the list of available
 approvers, allows
 selection, but "transfer" button does not actually
 transfer.
 When the cart is saved, the added approval shows as "no
 approval
 available".
 We are using the standard workflows for 2 step approval.
 A document is attached to show what happens and the
 results of checks
 we have performed.
 BUS2121 also shows as ok when checked.
Any pointers what could be possible reasons.
Points for sure. !!
Regards
- Atul

Hi Atul,
Here is the list.
 |----- 0000702787 EBP 4.0: Message "Enter a country"
 |----- 0000732828 E-mail messages for work items with incorrect line break
 |----- 0000735026 Memory problems at BBP_GETLIST_INDEX_FILL
 |----- 0000804317 SRM40/SUS/PO: PO inbound with error BBP_PD 147
 |----- 0000862851 PO not ordered due to different locations error
 |----- 0000902956 Changing Account assignment category BE Limit service PO
 |----- 0000911446 No reservation is created
 |----- 0000917869 SRM 5.0: PPOMV_BBP - Vendor address tab page
 |----- 0000919553 SRM 5.0: Termination of output preview for invalid partner
 |----- 0000920363 Shopping cart transfer: Sourcing indicator is not set
 |----- 0000924218 SRM 5.0: wrong error message for non existant auth. PurchOrg
 |----- 0000924811 SRM5.0: Javascript error on document screen
 |----- 0000926750 Shopping cart: Unit of measure is not restored
 |----- 0000926878 Link for expanding details in the shopping cart too small
 |----- 0000927142 SRM5.0: Browser hangs up during attachment upload
 |----- 0000938168 SRM50: Message "No default value from vendor master"
 |----- 0000938296 JavaScript runtime error in the bid invitation
 |----- 0000940805 BBPS_SC_APP_SOS cannot be enhanced
 |----- 0000941935 External requirements displayed as a reference
 |----- 0000942742 Update is cancelled if new source of supply is found
 |----- 0000944592 No location when vendor has changed
 |----- 0000944918 ECS: Find back end purchasing group as a responsible group
 |----- 0000945601 Termination when you display purchase order item detail
 |----- 0000948425 Shopping basket changeable although already approved
 |----- 0000953238 Shopping cart history in the sourcing cockpit
 |----- 0000954066 Follow-On Documents Tab does not get Highlighted
 |----- 0000954409 Error message during approval of a confirmation
 |----- 0000955377 Long runtimes for workflows with blocks
 |----- 0000956108 Empty worklist after clicking button 'Find'
 |----- 0000956723 BBPMAININT:Bus. partner display switches to maintenance mode
 |----- 0000956797 RUSRM50: Limit Purchase Order Functional Area Error Message
 |----- 0000957884 Category Management: Data disappears after program SAVE
 |----- 0000958045 BBPSC04: Delete icon not hidden despite screen variant
 |----- 0000958349 Final delivery with quantity 0
 |----- 0000959528 During PO creation wrong error message BBP_PD 428
 |----- 0000960169 Favorites not saved for 'Purchase for'
 |----- 0000961422 BBP_MON_SC: No search help for 'Created By'
 |----- 0000962093 BBP_VENDOR_CREATE: Refresh BP data
 |----- 0000962252 BBP_GETLIST_INDEX_FILL: Incorrect processing statistics
 |----- 0000962474 Error after changing partner data
 |----- 0000964132 Approval Preview for Rejected Items: Wrong User's Inbox
 |----- 0000964361 Cannot find employee of vendor
 |----- 0000964455 Country for the PO box is initial
 |----- 0000964911 Kopieren von Alertkategorien: Containerelemente verschwinden
 |----- 0000966072 Download of material fails - set type COMM_PR_UNIT
 |----- 0000966323 Service Item: Not able to create PO in ERP backend
 |----- 0000967429 Approval buttons not updated after release
 |----- 0000967615 Performance of BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL may be poor
 |----- 0000968110 Transfer canceled, account assignment acc. to value/quantity
 |----- 0000968251 BBPSC02:In source of supply preferred vendor not validated
 |----- 0000969091 SRM does not support passwords longer than 8 characters
 |----- 0000982293 Ext requirements: Purchasing group data not transferred
 |----- 0000982448 Impossibility to delete an item in PO
 |----- 0000982674 Change PO quantity does not update account assign quantity
 |----- 0000983130 Search for back-end purchase orders using the requester name
 |----- 0000984184 BADI BBP_ALERTING active but its implementation isn't called
 |----- 0000985179 Delete button active for backend service entry sheets
 |----- 0000990264 Multiple confirmations cannot be posted for service & limit
 |----- 0000996104 No catalog when confirming back-end blanket purchase orders
 |----- 0001003408 BBPCF: Cannot Add Catalog Item to Confirmation for Limit PO
 0001010791 Flag Confirmation based Invoice Verification set erroneous
Kind regards,
Yann

No quants exist for posting changes. Creating TOu00B4s in LU04.

When creating transfer orders in LU04, we get an error message "No quants exist for posting changes'. We are using batch managed and serialized materials. Using QM interface, so, inspection lots are created at Goods Receipt. When QM team "accepts" batch materials during inspection lot, there is no problem, but when "accepts" serialized materials, the system creates posting changes notices but can not create transfer orders sending the message before described. This is because after receiving the serialized materials, we receive one piece at a time in order to create one inspection lot for every serial number. But when we put away the materials, we put them away in the same bin. so, system assigns one quant and one inspection lot to the bin, updating the last one every time we put away one serial number. When system tries to look for the inspection lot number selected in QA32, is not finding it in the bin at WM level because the bin only contains the last inspection lot that was put it away.
With batch managed numbers there is no problem since SAP divides the bin in different quants with the correspondent batches assigning an inspection lot to each quant.
Is there any alternative to solve the issue with the serialized materials? We are using SAP ECC 6.0.
Thanks for any help.

Hi,
The reason why we put away serialized materials into the same bin is because materials are physically small and they fit more than one in each bin. The warehouse is structured in this way and we plan to use it like that because it wouldn´t be feasible to create one bin for each serialized material. Is there any other way to manage this situation?
Thanks in advance.

Summarization Levels in COPA. Tr Code KEDV

Dear All,
I request you to give me some Clarifications on Summarization Levels namely;
1) Are the summarization levels build form Line Items tables(CE1XXXX and CE2XXXX).
2) If so how does it get the field "PLIKZ"(Plan/Actual Indicator) for Plan line items as this field so not part of CE2XXXX, so How is it Updated?
3) Assuming that there are Performance problems even after using Summarization Levels, can you please explain as to how exactly do the Indexs work.?
4) In Indexes, there are 5 Columns with the title "Field", each of the column containing multiple rows, can you please explain what is the use of each of the columns.?
5) i have gone through the OSS Note "83204", in it there is a path(given below) given to download the information on Summarization Levels. However, i was not sure as to how to download it Could you please let me know how to download it.If Possible can you upload the document under "Wiki" or " Articles".
Below is the data and the file path from the note:
===============================================
The document can be downloaded via ftp from the sapserv3 server (binary
transfer mode). The German or English version is stored in directory:
(~ftp/)general/R3server/abap/note.0083204
under the name h83204dt.doc or n83204en.doc.

Hi,
Please follow instructions in note 480180 to download the file. Also for creating index you can refer to note 35288. Together with summarization levels and a proper secondary index you should not face major performace issue. If the performance continues to be bad then you must think about archiving the CE1 or CE4 tables in CO-PA.
Regards,
Abhisek

CO-PA Summarization Level

Hi,
I am very unclear about summarization levels in CO-PA. Please can any one explain me what is the real significance of summarization level, why do we need it and steps to configure it, and on what logic is data extracted from it.
Thank you,
Sam

1. What is use of summarizattion in COPA?
summarization level in Profitability Analysis (CO-PA):
A summarization level is a tool for improving performance.
Summarization levels store an original dataset in summarized form. This gives quick access to presummarized data for functions that do not need detailed information, and means that the data does not need to be summarized separately each time.
you can check this in this link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/ae/bd116e940f11d2b63c0000e82debc6/frameset.htm
2. If we dont give summarization in COPA Account based will records be available in RSA3 - yes
2. How to create summarization level for a datasource?
You can do this in Transaction - KCDU/KCDV or SPRO
Hope it helps.
Regards

CO-PA Summarization Levels

Hi,
for a report with many characteristics I created 4 summarization levels in such a way that
Summarization Level 2 includes all characteristics of the Summarization Level 1 + some more
Summarization Level 3 includes all characteristics of the Summarization Level 2 + some more
Summarization Level 4 includes all characteristics of the Summarization Level 3 + some more
In the report options, in Presummarized data section, I selected "Read upon each navigation step".
Now when I execute the report, data is first read from the Summarization Level 1. During drill down data is read from further summarization levels depending on which characteristic is used for the drill down.
There is one thing that I don't understand:
None of these summarization levels is used by the system if it does not contain the characteristic "Product".
As Product is not used for the initial selection of the report I initially put it on Summarization Level 3. But the system did not want to use Summarization Levels 1 and 2 then. When I added the Product to the Levels 1 and 2, everything is working fine. However this is not what I need because Product is not displayed on the first screen of the report.
Do you know why the characteristic "Product" is required in each summarization level?
I will appreciate your help very much!
With best regards,
Marcin

Hi Surya,
My report is calling all summarization levels.
At the start the summariyation level 1 is called. It is most aggregated so it is little time needed to start the report. It contains only the most frequently used characteristics.
During drilldown other summarization levels can be called (this is achieved thru the option "Read upon each navigation step"). It depends on which characteristic is used for drilldown: if the characteristic used for drilldown is not included in the currently used summarization level, the next least aggregated summarization level which includes this characteristic is called.
The most frequently used characteristics are included in the most aggregated summarization level, the least frequently used characteristics are included in the least aggregated summarization level, which contains all characteristics used in the report.
With best regards,
Marcin

Summarization Levels COPA

Hello all,
I´ve created a Summarization Level using transaction KEDV.
The Summarization Level has still the status "to be created" in KEDV, even when I safe it, it does not change the status, so the tables are not built.
When I try to update/ built/ rebuilt the level by using KEDU, it says it is not possible, because of the status "to be created".
How can I change the status and built the tables for the summarization level?
Thanks for your answers,
Michael

Try using the program "RKETREGN" to build.

Script level upgrade for database 'master' failed because upgrade step 'msdb110_upgrade.sql' encountered error 537, state 3, severity 16

Hello,
I've encountered issue during installation of SP1 to SQL Server 2012. After upgrade I'm getting this error in Event Log:
Script level upgrade for database 'master' failed because upgrade step 'msdb110_upgrade.sql' encountered error 537, state 3, severity 16. This is a serious error condition which might interfere with regular operation and the database will be taken offline.
If the error happened during upgrade of the 'master' database, it will prevent the entire SQL Server instance from starting. Examine the previous errorlog entries for errors, take the appropriate corrective actions and re-start the database so that the script
upgrade steps run to completion.
Can someone point me direction how I can fix it? This is a production server and currently only way to make it working is to use T902 flag in SQL Server startup params. I've found some suggestions to check Data path if it exists but it does so this is not
the issue here. Any ideas?
I've found also here
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/Forums/Topic1377073-1550-1.aspx#bm1378279
suggestions for similar issue with SQL Server 2008 which that I should do:
Via ssms:
From msdb:
Delete:
dc_admin role
Dc_operator role
Dc_proxy role
UlitityCMRReader role
UtilityIMRReader role
UtilityIMRWriter role
but for not I didn't tried it yet. This is standalone SQL Server instance.
Any help really appreciated.
Regards

Script returns the same error.
System databases:
1   1   760   -1   10   1048578   0   1   master       C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL10.MSSQLSERVER\MSSQL\DATA\master.mdf
2   0   12768   -1   10   1048642   0   1   mastlog       C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL10.MSSQLSERVER\MSSQL\DATA\mastlog.ldf
1   1   1024   -1   10   1048578   0   2   tempdev       C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL10.MSSQLSERVER\MSSQL\DATA\tempdb.mdf
2   0   64   -1   10   1048642   0   2   templog       C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL10.MSSQLSERVER\MSSQL\DATA\templog.ldf
1   1   288   -1   128   2   0   3   modeldev   C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL10.MSSQLSERVER\MSSQL\DATA\model.mdf
2   0   4464   -1   10   1048642   0   3   modellog   C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL10.MSSQLSERVER\MSSQL\DATA\modellog.ldf
1   1   28936   -1   10   1048578   0   4   MSDBData   C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL10.MSSQLSERVER\MSSQL\DATA\MSDBData.mdf
2   0   3352   268435456   10   1048642   0   4   MSDBLog   C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL10.MSSQLSERVER\MSSQL\DATA\MSDBLog.ldf
are all in place where path shows.
Before sending my message I've searched update script for "FROM master.sys.master_files" and I found script which you are showing me. I've made some digging and when I runned:
       SELECT physical_name
       FROM master.sys.master_files
       WHERE (name = N'master')
it returned also path to one my customers database name which has filename set correctly but it's Logical DB name is master and mastlog. I'm running shared hosting company and I allow my customers to restore their DBs from .bak files but I have no idea why
this customers logical name is set to master and mastlog. Probably when I change this names update script will work as it should. On the other hand in my opinion there should be some kind of fail safe mechanism for situations like this one.
EDIT: After changing logical name for DB and log for mentioned DB your script runned fine so probably now when I remove T902 flag and restart my SQL Server update will run correctly. Big thanks for resolving this issue.

Tax code does not exist for jurisdiction code in creating purchase order

Hello Experts,
After doing a technical upgrade from 4.6 C to ECC EHP 4 , while creating a PO , we are facing an error that
"Tax code A0 does not exist for jurisdiction code 4318702801". for one plant .
But in 4.6C, there is no problem with the field jurisdiction code in Invoice tab at the PO item level data. it allowed to create PO even with out entering jurisdiction code .
we have assigned jurisdiction code to the particular plant through config settings in T code OX10.And also we have verified the G/L account properties for the material used in creaton of PO. it will allow all tax codes.
But still we are facing the same error.
Please suggest where to establish linkgae betweeen Tax code and jurisdiction code at customize / config level.
it is very high priority issue . please suggest
regards,
Tulasi

Hi,
As tax jurisdiction code is assigned to your plant on OX10 t.code and cross check Tax code declared as input tax & assigned to company code in t.code: OBCL with tjurisdiction code.
Now double cross check Tax code created (FTXP)for your country with jurisdiction code.
Also check table A003 for entry of tax code and company code.
Regards,
Biju K

No summarization level exists for cycle 261001_KEU5

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for