No use tax calculated

we are using ERS to invoice vendor, very odd thing happend: we can invoice 1 PO line, but we can't invoice the other PO line. 
So user tried to manually settle the invoice for the other PO line using MIRO,  checked " calculate tax " , and we are using U1( self-assessment tax), but when user simulate the entry, it didn't calculate the tax and the entry looks like this:
DR       AP GR/IR Account
CR       vendor account didn't show up but has the amount showed up and no tax claculated.
why is that happened? how to solve it? please advise.
normally accounting entry should be like this:
Dr  AP GR/IR Account
CR  vendor
CR  Use Tax Payable

Check if your tax account is set up in Ob40, Not sure other wise why the tax isnt being calculated, you can post tax thorugh tcode Fb41seperately i guess, not sure so plz double check
Regards,
Zaid

Similar Messages

  • Best Practice: Correct Use Tax Calculation

    Hello,
    Our company is wanting to find out how other companines handle the below business process scenario involving use tax:
    Company orders 100 units of materials for delivery to location A.  Tax is calculated on PO based on location A ship-to address in SAP.  Once company receives the materials in location A, company then transfer the materials out to location B for final use.
    We are wanting to get some best practice business process suggestions for this scenario so that the correct tax is captured and paid based on the final usage location of the materials.
    Thanks!

    Most commonly used process for this :-
    Steps:-
    1)Plant A:- Will place the PO on vendor  {Material would be the trading material "HAWA} ( You need to maintain the purchasing data and sales data for this material)
    2)Plant B:- will place the stock transfer PO on plant A for that material
    Thanks,
    Vikas Rander.
    Edited by: Vikas Rander on Jun 8, 2010 9:39 AM

  • Profit center splitting - Intercompany FB60 - Sales/Use Tax Vendor invoices

    We are implementing Use Tax calculations for Vendor invoices and are stuck on an issue with profit center splitting when entering intercompany AP transactions (FB60).     The tax postings of the non-leading company are being split between the two company profit centers.
    When posting a vendor invoice with more than one company the tax items of the leading company are posting with the correct profit center but tax items if the non-leading company are splitting between the profit centers of the two companies.   The total amount of the tax is still correct, just part of it is posted to the wrong profit center. 
    We are assuming this is a document splitting issue but changes to document splitting configuration did not get the desired effect of not splitting the tax accounts.   
    Are there any suggestions of particular areas of document splitting that we should look into or other areas that might be causing this profit center splitting for the tax items?  Any ideas would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Jeff

    Hi Murlidhar,
    Here's a sample transaction with the problem results we are seeing.  Normal AP transactions are posting fine, it is only when Sales/use tax is added that we are finding a problem with the profit center splitting.
    Entering a two line FB60 transaction under company 0001.
    Line 1  - Company 0001, profit center 220020, $100
    Line 2 - Company  0002, profit center 250020, $100
    SAP sends this transaction to our external tax system which returns the tax amounts to accrue for each line item.
    Line 1 $7.30 for company 0001
    Line 2 $9.05 for company 0002
    When the transaction is then viewed in General Ledger View we see the tax amount of $7.30 posting to profit center 220020 but the tax amount for line 2 of $9.05 is evenly divided between profit centers 220020 and 250020. 
    The $9.05 should be posting only to profit center 250020 as the profit center assigned to line 2 of the transaction.
    Thanks,
    Jeff

  • Tax calculation in CRM using R/3 pricing procedure

    Hello Experts
    We are using R/3 pricing procedure to calculate list prices in CRM.
    The condition record for Taxes are maintained for condition type UTXJ in SD which is calling for tax procedure TAXUSJ and condition type JR1. 
    The records are maintained in FTXP.  This is the SAP Standard way of maintaining taxes if external tax software is not used.
    We have downloaded the condition records and condition types in CRM.  The tables have all the required records downloaded from R/3.
    When creating an order in Webshop the tax is not getting calculated.
    The pricing analysis shows that the condition record for UTXJ condtion type is met, but it is not showing the tax maintained for condition type JR1. 
    Have we missed any settings here? 
    If we are using R/3 billling does the TTE needs to be activated for calculating taxes in the webshop?
    If TTE needed to be used for calculating taxes, what are the settings needed to be configured?
    Thanks in advance for the valuable advice.
    Sastri

    Hi Sastri,
    I am facing this problem with TAX Condition Records: Pricing error: Mandatory condition MWST is missing. I am using a R/3 pricing procedure correctly downloaded to CRM.
    You say that you have downloaded the condition records and condition types in CRM. SAP Library says 'Prerrequisites: You have downloaded the tax condition records from SAP ECC'.
    I don't know If my problem is caused because I haven't downloaded any Tax Condition Records. The fact is that I cannot determine which one is the Condition Object to download in R3AS.
    I would really appreciate if you or anyone could tell me which object you did use.
    thanks in advance,
    Pablo
    Edited by: Pablo Rodríguez Mateos on Sep 30, 2009 12:30 PM
    Edited by: Pablo Rodríguez Mateos on Sep 30, 2009 8:59 PM
    Solved!

  • How AP behaves for withholding tax when vertax is used for tax calculation

    Hi,
    I am currently working on R12 implementation, I have requirement where business has to calculate the USE tax and withhold it from being paid to the supplier in case if use tax is not mentioned on the Invoice and pay it to tax authorities directly by business. Our client has Vertax third party tax engine. now the question is does it works same as it is in oracle payables in cases if client want to use vertax to calculate tax. How oracle behaves for withholding tax when vertax is used for tax calculations.
    Regards,
    Shashi.

    Hi
    Cheque Go to Menubar of  which document you have to  post for getting the WHT value  Menubar Settings - editing options -  remove the tick calculate tax on net amount.
    Rgds
    Vani

  • Income Tax Calculations - Issue

    Client is saying that as per their existing SAP system, the Income tax calculation is made on Gross salary. And they are saying that if any additional taxable payout is made in a month to an employee, then the total tax on this additional payout should be paid by the employee in the same month. So basically his total tax would be the (general regular monthly tax + total tax on the additional payment), which as per them the system is not calculating correctly since October 2010.

    Hi,
    Thanks for your reply Jurgen & Remi.  I am pretty new to Payroll & this is India Payroll.
    Now, the issue is how should I proceed ahead.
    1. The client says that the wage types are already configured in the system in such way that on certain wage types, the tax which is calculated is paid in the same month. Can u pls inform that which processing class & cumulation class do I need to check in Table 512w_d for this wage type.
    2. As I need to see this whole functioning in Schema, pls guide as to where I should check this whole tax calculation in Schema.
    3. The function I have heard which is used is India for Income tax is INTAX.
    Looking forward to your reply.
    Thanks a lot!!!
    Edited by: SAP ST on Nov 25, 2010 7:24 PM

  • Tax Calculation on Consignment GR/IR

    Hello Experts,
    After ECC 6.0 upgrade, we are running into issue with Consignments. It's not automatically clearing the GR/IR account due to difference in amount.
    Here is how accounting document is getting posted:
    When Material is withdrawn -
    Db Plant Maint. 100
    Cr GR/IR cons. 100
    When Settlement is done -
    Db GR/IR cons. 105 (Tax code U1)
    Cr Vendor         100 (Tax code U1)
    Cr Tax Accrual 5     (Tax code U1)
    As a result we are forced to manually clear them using F-03. In previous environment 4.6B, Vendor line item didn't inherit the tax code and hence we never had tax line item. As per SAP, it was an error in previous versions and they corrected it in ECC 6.0 but manually doing it consuming lot of time for business users. Alternative suggested by SAP was to manually create the invoice instead of using MRKO but that's not something as it also makes the effort manual... (OSS 467162 and 984761)
    Has anyone run into similar issue... how is this being handled in other companies.
    Any advice on this issue will be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks!
    N
    PS: All answers will be duly rewarded.
    Edited by: Nandita on Jul 21, 2009 4:03 PM

    Hi
    This setting works fine but it would have been at the time of initial stage.
    But in my client (Newzealand client) already we are using tax procedure TAXNZ and condition type for GST is included in that.
    So I can not include GST in pricing procudure now, because there are many open items like Purchase orders exists in system which may in tern cause an adverse effect.
    So kindly let me know is there any way that Net price can be taken for calculation for GST calcualtion.
    eg:   1  Gross Price   From  To
            2  frb2 freight 
            3  Net price            1     2
    Net price should be taken to TAXNZ for GST calculation. I have already tried using routines 363, 362 etc in TAXNZ and sub total 4 for FRB2 in pricing procedure but did not succeed.
    Please let me know is it can be achievable.
    Thanks
    Rajan.

  • Excise not captured in the MIGO & Tax calculation is not correct in the PO.

    Excise Settings completed.                    02.11.2007
    a)     Configuration done as per J05 Building block.( Tax Procedure TAXINN)
    b)     Maintained J1ID, all steps.
    c)     Maintained tax code in FTXP.
    d)     FV11  Maintained for Material, vendor, Plant in combination with Tax code input tax maintained in FTXP.
    e)     Checked CIN Health, all tick are green.
    f)     Given all G/L accounts for Excise Transaction Type (ETT)
    g)     Maintained all number Ranges.
    Issue  1)
    Tax calculation is not correct in the PO, tax tab
    a)     JMIP is appearing 12% in condition amount, (as per condition record) but condition value is Zero, (Not calculated by the FI Pricing procedure). Screen shot for Pricing procedure, PO taxes and condition record given below.
    b)     JIPC Sales tax 4% in condition amount (as per condition record) , calculated by the FI Pricing procedure is 8%, condition value is Rs 8 instead of Rs 4
    Fi pricing procedure.
    PO Taxes  wrong Tax calculated
    FV11 Condition record
    Issue  2)
    While creating Goods receipt aginst PO (Tax code V2 in PO). Movement type 101, Excise tab appears at Header and Item level and we need to put the Vendors Excise Invoice and date, nothing is copied from the PO for Excise duty  & sales tax.
    Now we put the values for ED and Sales tax manually in the MIGO and saved the document. While display material document, excise tab is not there i.e. no excise related activiy is captured here in goods receipt.
    If you need more detail, please revert on cell 093295 53235.
    Please suggest.
    Manish Gupta
    93295 53235
    [email protected]

    Hai,
    1.Check the condition types JMIP & JMIC in IMG - Financial accting New - FI AC Global settings - Taxes on sales and purchases - Check calculation procedure - Define condition type.
    2.The condition types you have used are defined for non deductible taxes i.e., it gets inventorised, added to the material account.And also the accural key assigned to this condition types are NVV - defined for non ded input taxes.
    3.Instead the condition types defined by SAP Standard system for BED & ST are JMOP & JIPS and the accurals assigned to this are VS1 & VS5.
    If you want clear details mail the screen shots to my id [email protected]

  • Warning: An error occurred during tax calculation. Please correct the problem or contact your system administrator.

    Hi All
    We are creating POs from interface program "Import Standard Purchase Order Program". Only for few of the POs, we are encountering the error 'Warning: An error occurred during tax calculation
    . Please correct the problem or contact your system administrator.'
    This error is happening for few PO's, other POs with same vendor, ship to and bill to location created successfully by the program
    Any inputs on how to resolve this error is greatly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Brajesh

    Hi Hussein,
    Thank for the prompt response.
    We have already applied the patch related to doc 1272684.1.
    Below are the environment detail.
    Database: Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
    Application : 12.1.3
    Diagnostic tool output :-
    INTERFACE_
    TRANSACTION_ID
    INTERFACE_TYPE
    COLUMN_NAME
    PROCESSING_DATE
    TABLE_NAME
    ERROR_MESSAGE_NAME
    ERROR_MESSAGE
    100148
    PO_DOCS_OPEN_INTERFACE
    09-Aug-2013
    PO_HEADERS_INTERFACE
    PO_PDOI_TAX_CALCULATION_ERR
    Warning: An error occurred during tax calculation. Please correct the problem or contact your system administrator.
    Log file :-
    +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
    Purchasing: Version : 12.0.0
    Copyright (c) 1979, 1999, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
    POXPOPDOI module: Import Standard Purchase Orders
    +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
    Current system time is 09-AUG-2013 21:09:04
    +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
    +-----------------------------
    | Starting concurrent program execution...
    +-----------------------------
    Arguments
    STANDARD
    N
    INCOMPLETE
    12805
    +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
    Start of log messages from FND_FILE
    +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
    To get the log messages for PDOI, please use the following id to query against FND_LOG_MESSAGES table:
    AUDSID = 12076063
    +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
    End of log messages from FND_FILE
    +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
    +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
    Executing request completion options...
    Output file size:
    69
    +------------- 1) PRINT   -------------+
    Printing output file.
                   Request ID : 55116524
             Number of copies : 0
                      Printer : noprint
    +--------------------------------------+
    Finished executing request completion options.
    +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
    Concurrent request completed successfully
    Current system time is 09-AUG-2013 22:27:42
    +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
    Brajesh

  • Sales and Use Tax Packages

    Here at KeySpan we are in the process of upgrading to Oracle 11i. We are also evaluating software packages for calculating sales
    and use tax in conjunction with Oracle Purchasing and Payables modules. How are other organizations doing this? Did you use
    the existing functionality in Oracle or purchase a package like Vertex or Taxware?
    - Mike Stankard

    Did you comeup with any solution for this??

  • Config for Tax calculation

    Hi All,
       I am  SRM functional guy but trying to analyze a issue we are having - Via SRM when we create Shopping Cart and send to backend for PO creation(Classic Scenario), Shopping cart item says 'Error in Transmission' and when I look at RZ20 it says 'For ERS Tax calculation has to be setup'.
    Please advise
    Thanks a lot.
    Rao

    Hi,
    For the ERS vendor the tax code is mandetory and the tax code which u are entering in SC,Please check in FTXP the tax code settings.
    Or if you want to avoide this error, use non ERS vendor in SC.
    Regards,
    Manish

  • Tax calculation on sales order and invoice is different

    2007A, SP0, PL49
    The tax on a sales order does not match the tax on the linked delivery and invoice by 1 cent. We take payment based on the sales order amount as the delivery and invoice are done after the fact. Why is the tax calculated differently on the delivery/invoice? We would want it to always match.
    Item price = $111.04. Taxcode rate 13% has combination of 5% GST + 8% ONTAX.
    On Sales Order, ONTAX = $8.88
    On Delivery/Invoice, ONTAX = $8.89
    Can someone please explain the difference? Is rounding/tax calcualtion controlled by system settings per document?

    Something must be wrong with your Sales Order tax.  The actual tax would be 8.8832.  Round up to 8.89 is correct.  Do you have any SP, FMS or add-on been used?
    Thanks,
    Gordon

  • Use Tax for Free of charge items

    Here is the scenario:
    In our Business, there is a process to give a Free item with mostly all the products sold online. In SAP, we will create regular sales order with 1 line item as TAN and other item category as TANN.
    The Business wants to calculate Use tax on the 2nd line item where Net value=0. As we use the same Pricing procedure, we cannot charge different taxes based on line item.
    The other option was to send the cost details to Vertex, so that they can store it in Vertex and use for Tax calculations. The technical issue is that whenever the Net value=0, Vertex RFC is not called.
    We have proposed to create a report in SAP which will tell them the order details with Free items but this is not acceptable to Business.
    Has anyone worked on such scenario where Use tax is calculated on the Sales side for Free of charge items.

    The basic concept in tax is seller can levy the appropriate tax on the items which they are billing.  This being the case, I am not sure, why for a free of charge item, tax should be levied.  Can you please share in which Business process, this is being followed.  Needless to mention, if at all you want to achieve this requirement, have a separate condition type for this free goods, set as statistical, so that, only tax portion would be posted to FI.
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Tax calculation in import process

    Dear SAP Consultants,
                       I have done invoice verifiaction for clearing agent . for clearig agent charges there is a service tax as well as e -cess and scond. cess. while invoicing for the same i am using a tax code for service tax and I observed that the tax is not calculating properly . this is because the system pickup the condition base value something else other than defined.
    Please help me how to find out this base value or how to correct the tax calculation process.
    I am uing TAXINN.
    Thanks & Regards.
    Sandeep

    Go through  M/08 pricing procidure,in find trabule may be there or in Po u r nt defining % praperly,

  • Two different tax calculation for same material/plant/vendor key combination

    Hi all,
    My requirement is that in PO client needs two different percentages of calculation of VAT for same plant/vendor/material.
    How can this be incorporated?
    regards,
    vins

    Hi Vinda,
    Can't you use Tax Code in Purchase order and enter as the case may be
    If not, please ellaborate with example
    Thanks
    Nishu

Maybe you are looking for

  • Inserting dashes in phone numbers

    Is there a way to insert the dashes between the area code and prefix and prefix and number on a curve. It would make the number so much easier to read. Message Edited by adbva on 10-29-2008 11:33 PM Solved! Go to Solution.

  • MM_swapimage issues

    I have a MMswap image set up with five images in a Table below a larger image (located in the middle of a very tall .php file), when I onmouseover, or onmouseout the smaller images they change out the larger image with the smaller as they should, but

  • Deactivate CS3 on XP Pro?

    Deactivate indicates unable to connect to Internet.  I'm not using proxy server.  Have read similar thread re checking update root certificate, but that doesn't apply.  Any suggestions?

  • Implementing Auto Correct Load as Oracle Merge

    Data Services 3.0 documentation reads that Auto Correct Load option for Oracle target will be implemented as a Merge statement, if both the source and the target reside in the same datastore. I have set this up as per documentation, however the Optim

  • I have 5.22 Gb of other data on my iPhone 5. What is this?

    Hi I have a 16GB iphone 5. Currently it shows 5.22 Gb of other data. If I look at the usage stats on the phone it totals about 3gb? How do I get rid of this 'other ' data or is this the OS??? Cheers